Articles | Volume 14, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1037-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1037-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Model description paper
| 
23 Feb 2021
Model description paper |
| 23 Feb 2021
| 23 Feb 2021
The global water resources and use model WaterGAP v2.2d: model description and evaluation
Hannes Müller Schmied
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Institute of Physical Geography, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Senckenberg Leibniz Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Denise Cáceres
Institute of Physical Geography, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Stephanie Eisner
Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO), Ås, Norway
Martina Flörke
Engineering Hydrology and Water Resources Management, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany
Claudia Herbert
Institute of Physical Geography, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Christoph Niemann
Institute of Physical Geography, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Thedini Asali Peiris
Institute of Physical Geography, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Eklavyya Popat
Institute of Physical Geography, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Felix Theodor Portmann
Institute of Physical Geography, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Robert Reinecke
Institute of Physical Geography, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
International Centre for Water Resources and Global Change (UNESCO), Federal Institute of Hydrology, Koblenz, Germany
Maike Schumacher
Institute of Physics and Meteorology, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
Computational Science Lab (CSL) at the University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
Somayeh Shadkam
Institute of Physical Geography, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Camelia-Eliza Telteu
Institute of Physical Geography, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Tim Trautmann
Institute of Physical Geography, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Petra Döll
Institute of Physical Geography, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Senckenberg Leibniz Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Related authors
Katja Frieler, Stefan Lange, Jacob Schewe, Matthias Mengel, Simon Treu, Christian Otto, Jan Volkholz, Christopher P. O. Reyer, Stefanie Heinicke, Colin Jones, Julia L. Blanchard, Cheryl S. Harrison, Colleen M. Petrik, Tyler D. Eddy, Kelly Ortega-Cisneros, Camilla Novaglio, Ryan Heneghan, Derek P. Tittensor, Olivier Maury, Matthias Büchner, Thomas Vogt, Dánnell Quesada Chacón, Kerry Emanuel, Chia-Ying Lee, Suzana J. Camargo, Jonas Jägermeyr, Sam Rabin, Jochen Klar, Iliusi D. Vega del Valle, Lisa Novak, Inga J. Sauer, Gitta Lasslop, Sarah Chadburn, Eleanor Burke, Angela Gallego-Sala, Noah Smith, Jinfeng Chang, Stijn Hantson, Chantelle Burton, Anne Gädeke, Fang Li, Simon N. Gosling, Hannes Müller Schmied, Fred Hattermann, Thomas Hickler, Rafael Marcé, Don Pierson, Wim Thiery, Daniel Mercado-Bettín, Robert Ladwig, Ana Isabel Ayala-Zamora, Matthew Forrest, Michel Bechtold, Robert Reinecke, Inge de Graaf, Jed O. Kaplan, Alexander Koch, and Matthieu Lengaigne
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2103, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2103, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes the experiments and data sets necessary to run historic and future impact projections, and the underlying assumptions of future climate change as defined by the 3rd round of the ISIMIP Project (Inter-sectoral Impactmodel Intercomparison Project, isimip.org). ISIMIP provides a framework for cross-sectorally consistent climate impact simulations to contribute to a comprehensive and consistent picture of the world under different climate-change scenarios.
Hannes Müller Schmied, Simon Newland Gosling, Marlo Garnsworthy, Laura Müller, Camelia-Eliza Telteu, Atiq Kainan Ahmed, Lauren Seaby Andersen, Julien Boulange, Peter Burek, Jinfeng Chang, He Chen, Lukas Gudmundsson, Manolis Grillakis, Luca Guillaumot, Naota Hanasaki, Aristeidis Koutroulis, Rohini Kumar, Guoyong Leng, Junguo Liu, Xingcai Liu, Inga Menke, Vimal Mishra, Yadu Pokhrel, Oldrich Rakovec, Luis Samaniego, Yusuke Satoh, Harsh Lovekumar Shah, Mikhail Smilovic, Tobias Stacke, Edwin Sutanudjaja, Wim Thiery, Athanasios Tsilimigkras, Yoshihide Wada, Niko Wanders, and Tokuta Yokohata
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2409–2425, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2409-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2409-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Global water models contribute to the evaluation of important natural and societal issues but are – as all models – simplified representation of reality. So, there are many ways to calculate the water fluxes and storages. This paper presents a visualization of 16 global water models using a standardized visualization and the pathway towards this common understanding. Next to academic education purposes, we envisage that these diagrams will help researchers, model developers, and data users.
Hannes Müller Schmied, Tim Trautmann, Sebastian Ackermann, Denise Cáceres, Martina Flörke, Helena Gerdener, Ellen Kynast, Thedini Asali Peiris, Leonie Schiebener, Maike Schumacher, and Petra Döll
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8817–8852, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8817-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8817-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Assessing water availability and water use at the global scale is challenging but essential for a range of purposes. We describe the newest version of the global hydrological model WaterGAP, which has been used for numerous water resource assessments since 1996. We show the effects of new model features, as well as model evaluations, against water abstraction statistics and observed streamflow and water storage anomalies. The publicly available model output for several variants is described.
Petra Döll, Howlader Mohammad Mehedi Hasan, Kerstin Schulze, Helena Gerdener, Lara Börger, Somayeh Shadkam, Sebastian Ackermann, Seyed-Mohammad Hosseini-Moghari, Hannes Müller Schmied, Andreas Güntner, and Jürgen Kusche
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2259–2295, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2259-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2259-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Currently, global hydrological models do not benefit from observations of model output variables to reduce and quantify model output uncertainty. For the Mississippi River basin, we explored three approaches for using both streamflow and total water storage anomaly observations to adjust the parameter sets in a global hydrological model. We developed a method for considering the observation uncertainties to quantify the uncertainty of model output and provide recommendations.
Katja Frieler, Jan Volkholz, Stefan Lange, Jacob Schewe, Matthias Mengel, María del Rocío Rivas López, Christian Otto, Christopher P. O. Reyer, Dirk Nikolaus Karger, Johanna T. Malle, Simon Treu, Christoph Menz, Julia L. Blanchard, Cheryl S. Harrison, Colleen M. Petrik, Tyler D. Eddy, Kelly Ortega-Cisneros, Camilla Novaglio, Yannick Rousseau, Reg A. Watson, Charles Stock, Xiao Liu, Ryan Heneghan, Derek Tittensor, Olivier Maury, Matthias Büchner, Thomas Vogt, Tingting Wang, Fubao Sun, Inga J. Sauer, Johannes Koch, Inne Vanderkelen, Jonas Jägermeyr, Christoph Müller, Sam Rabin, Jochen Klar, Iliusi D. Vega del Valle, Gitta Lasslop, Sarah Chadburn, Eleanor Burke, Angela Gallego-Sala, Noah Smith, Jinfeng Chang, Stijn Hantson, Chantelle Burton, Anne Gädeke, Fang Li, Simon N. Gosling, Hannes Müller Schmied, Fred Hattermann, Jida Wang, Fangfang Yao, Thomas Hickler, Rafael Marcé, Don Pierson, Wim Thiery, Daniel Mercado-Bettín, Robert Ladwig, Ana Isabel Ayala-Zamora, Matthew Forrest, and Michel Bechtold
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1–51, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Our paper provides an overview of all observational climate-related and socioeconomic forcing data used as input for the impact model evaluation and impact attribution experiments within the third round of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project. The experiments are designed to test our understanding of observed changes in natural and human systems and to quantify to what degree these changes have already been induced by climate change.
Kedar Otta, Hannes Müller Schmied, Simon N. Gosling, and Naota Hanasaki
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-215, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-215, 2023
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
Reservoirs play important roles in hydrology and water resources management globally and are incorporated into many Global Hydrological Models. Their simulations are, however, poorly validated due to the lack of available long-term in-situ observation data globally. Here we investigated the applicability of the latest satellite-based reservoir storage estimations in the contiguous US. We found that those products are useful for validating reservoir storage simulations when they are normalized.
Vili Virkki, Elina Alanärä, Miina Porkka, Lauri Ahopelto, Tom Gleeson, Chinchu Mohan, Lan Wang-Erlandsson, Martina Flörke, Dieter Gerten, Simon N. Gosling, Naota Hanasaki, Hannes Müller Schmied, Niko Wanders, and Matti Kummu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3315–3336, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3315-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3315-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Direct and indirect human actions have altered streamflow across the world since pre-industrial times. Here, we apply a method of environmental flow envelopes (EFEs) that develops the existing global environmental flow assessments by methodological advances and better consideration of uncertainty. By assessing the violations of the EFE, we comprehensively quantify the frequency, severity, and trends of flow alteration during the past decades, illustrating anthropogenic effects on streamflow.
Martin Horwath, Benjamin D. Gutknecht, Anny Cazenave, Hindumathi Kulaiappan Palanisamy, Florence Marti, Ben Marzeion, Frank Paul, Raymond Le Bris, Anna E. Hogg, Inès Otosaka, Andrew Shepherd, Petra Döll, Denise Cáceres, Hannes Müller Schmied, Johnny A. Johannessen, Jan Even Øie Nilsen, Roshin P. Raj, René Forsberg, Louise Sandberg Sørensen, Valentina R. Barletta, Sebastian B. Simonsen, Per Knudsen, Ole Baltazar Andersen, Heidi Ranndal, Stine K. Rose, Christopher J. Merchant, Claire R. Macintosh, Karina von Schuckmann, Kristin Novotny, Andreas Groh, Marco Restano, and Jérôme Benveniste
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 411–447, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-411-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-411-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Global mean sea-level change observed from 1993 to 2016 (mean rate of 3.05 mm yr−1) matches the combined effect of changes in water density (thermal expansion) and ocean mass. Ocean-mass change has been assessed through the contributions from glaciers, ice sheets, and land water storage or directly from satellite data since 2003. Our budget assessments of linear trends and monthly anomalies utilise new datasets and uncertainty characterisations developed within ESA's Climate Change Initiative.
Camelia-Eliza Telteu, Hannes Müller Schmied, Wim Thiery, Guoyong Leng, Peter Burek, Xingcai Liu, Julien Eric Stanislas Boulange, Lauren Seaby Andersen, Manolis Grillakis, Simon Newland Gosling, Yusuke Satoh, Oldrich Rakovec, Tobias Stacke, Jinfeng Chang, Niko Wanders, Harsh Lovekumar Shah, Tim Trautmann, Ganquan Mao, Naota Hanasaki, Aristeidis Koutroulis, Yadu Pokhrel, Luis Samaniego, Yoshihide Wada, Vimal Mishra, Junguo Liu, Petra Döll, Fang Zhao, Anne Gädeke, Sam S. Rabin, and Florian Herz
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3843–3878, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3843-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3843-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We analyse water storage compartments, water flows, and human water use sectors included in 16 global water models that provide simulations for the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project phase 2b. We develop a standard writing style for the model equations. We conclude that even though hydrologic processes are often based on similar equations, in the end these equations have been adjusted, or the models have used different values for specific parameters or specific variables.
Robert Reinecke, Hannes Müller Schmied, Tim Trautmann, Lauren Seaby Andersen, Peter Burek, Martina Flörke, Simon N. Gosling, Manolis Grillakis, Naota Hanasaki, Aristeidis Koutroulis, Yadu Pokhrel, Wim Thiery, Yoshihide Wada, Satoh Yusuke, and Petra Döll
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 787–810, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-787-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-787-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Billions of people rely on groundwater as an accessible source of drinking water and for irrigation, especially in times of drought. Groundwater recharge is the primary process of regenerating groundwater resources. We find that groundwater recharge will increase in northern Europe by about 19 % and decrease by 10 % in the Amazon with 3 °C global warming. In the Mediterranean, a 2 °C warming has already lead to a reduction in recharge by 38 %. However, these model predictions are uncertain.
Denise Cáceres, Ben Marzeion, Jan Hendrik Malles, Benjamin Daniel Gutknecht, Hannes Müller Schmied, and Petra Döll
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4831–4851, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4831-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4831-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We analysed how and to which extent changes in water storage on continents had an effect on global ocean mass over the period 1948–2016. Continents lost water to oceans at an accelerated rate, inducing sea level rise. Shrinking glaciers explain 81 % of the long-term continental water mass loss, while declining groundwater levels, mainly due to sustained groundwater pumping for irrigation, is the second major driver. This long-term decline was partly offset by the impoundment of water in dams.
Marco Cucchi, Graham P. Weedon, Alessandro Amici, Nicolas Bellouin, Stefan Lange, Hannes Müller Schmied, Hans Hersbach, and Carlo Buontempo
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 2097–2120, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2097-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2097-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
WFDE5 is a novel meteorological forcing dataset for running land surface and global hydrological models. It has been generated using the WATCH Forcing Data methodology applied to surface meteorological variables from the ERA5 reanalysis. It is publicly available, along with its source code, through the C3S Climate Data Store at ECMWF. Results of the evaluations described in the paper highlight the benefits of using WFDE5 compared to both ERA5 and its predecessor WFDEI.
Emmanuel Nyenah, Petra Döll, Martina Flörke, Leon Mühlenbruch, Lasse Nissen, and Robert Reinecke
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 5635–5653, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-5635-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-5635-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We reprogrammed the latest WaterGAP model (2.2e) to create a sustainable global hydrological model. By utilizing best software practices like modular design, version control, and clear documentation, the new WaterGAP supports collaboration across teams. It can be easily understood, applied, and enhanced by both novice and experienced modellers. Additionally, we share the reprogramming process to assist in the reprogramming of other large geoscientific research software.
Seyed-Mohammad Hosseini-Moghari and Petra Döll
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 4073–4092, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-4073-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-4073-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Modeling reservoir outflow and storage is challenging due to limited publicly available data and human decision-making. For 100 reservoirs in the US, we examined how calibrating reservoir algorithms against outflow and storage-related variables affects performance. We found that calibration notably improves storage simulations, while outflow simulations are more influenced by the quality of inflow data. We recommend using remotely sensed storage anomalies to calibrate reservoir algorithms.
Katja Frieler, Stefan Lange, Jacob Schewe, Matthias Mengel, Simon Treu, Christian Otto, Jan Volkholz, Christopher P. O. Reyer, Stefanie Heinicke, Colin Jones, Julia L. Blanchard, Cheryl S. Harrison, Colleen M. Petrik, Tyler D. Eddy, Kelly Ortega-Cisneros, Camilla Novaglio, Ryan Heneghan, Derek P. Tittensor, Olivier Maury, Matthias Büchner, Thomas Vogt, Dánnell Quesada Chacón, Kerry Emanuel, Chia-Ying Lee, Suzana J. Camargo, Jonas Jägermeyr, Sam Rabin, Jochen Klar, Iliusi D. Vega del Valle, Lisa Novak, Inga J. Sauer, Gitta Lasslop, Sarah Chadburn, Eleanor Burke, Angela Gallego-Sala, Noah Smith, Jinfeng Chang, Stijn Hantson, Chantelle Burton, Anne Gädeke, Fang Li, Simon N. Gosling, Hannes Müller Schmied, Fred Hattermann, Thomas Hickler, Rafael Marcé, Don Pierson, Wim Thiery, Daniel Mercado-Bettín, Robert Ladwig, Ana Isabel Ayala-Zamora, Matthew Forrest, Michel Bechtold, Robert Reinecke, Inge de Graaf, Jed O. Kaplan, Alexander Koch, and Matthieu Lengaigne
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2103, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2103, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes the experiments and data sets necessary to run historic and future impact projections, and the underlying assumptions of future climate change as defined by the 3rd round of the ISIMIP Project (Inter-sectoral Impactmodel Intercomparison Project, isimip.org). ISIMIP provides a framework for cross-sectorally consistent climate impact simulations to contribute to a comprehensive and consistent picture of the world under different climate-change scenarios.
Hannes Müller Schmied, Simon Newland Gosling, Marlo Garnsworthy, Laura Müller, Camelia-Eliza Telteu, Atiq Kainan Ahmed, Lauren Seaby Andersen, Julien Boulange, Peter Burek, Jinfeng Chang, He Chen, Lukas Gudmundsson, Manolis Grillakis, Luca Guillaumot, Naota Hanasaki, Aristeidis Koutroulis, Rohini Kumar, Guoyong Leng, Junguo Liu, Xingcai Liu, Inga Menke, Vimal Mishra, Yadu Pokhrel, Oldrich Rakovec, Luis Samaniego, Yusuke Satoh, Harsh Lovekumar Shah, Mikhail Smilovic, Tobias Stacke, Edwin Sutanudjaja, Wim Thiery, Athanasios Tsilimigkras, Yoshihide Wada, Niko Wanders, and Tokuta Yokohata
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2409–2425, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2409-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2409-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Global water models contribute to the evaluation of important natural and societal issues but are – as all models – simplified representation of reality. So, there are many ways to calculate the water fluxes and storages. This paper presents a visualization of 16 global water models using a standardized visualization and the pathway towards this common understanding. Next to academic education purposes, we envisage that these diagrams will help researchers, model developers, and data users.
Robert Reinecke, Annemarie Bäthge, Ricarda Dietrich, Sebastian Gnann, Simon N. Gosling, Danielle Grogan, Andreas Hartmann, Stefan Kollet, Rohini Kumar, Richard Lammers, Sida Liu, Yan Liu, Nils Moosdorf, Bibi Naz, Sara Nazari, Chibuike Orazulike, Yadu Pokhrel, Jacob Schewe, Mikhail Smilovic, Maryna Strokal, Yoshihide Wada, Shan Zuidema, and Inge de Graaf
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1181, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1181, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Here we describe a collaborative effort to improve predictions of how climate change will affect groundwater. The ISIMIP groundwater sector combines multiple global groundwater models to capture a range of possible outcomes and reduce uncertainty. Initial comparisons reveal significant differences between models in key metrics like water table depth and recharge rates, highlighting the need for structured model intercomparisons.
Howlader Mohammad Mehedi Hasan, Petra Döll, Seyed-Mohammad Hosseini-Moghari, Fabrice Papa, and Andreas Güntner
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 567–596, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-567-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-567-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We calibrate a global hydrological model using multiple observations to analyse the benefits and trade-offs of multi-variable calibration. We found such an approach to be very important for understanding the real-world system. However, some observations are very essential to the system, in particular, streamflow. We also showed uncertainties in the calibration results, which are often useful for making informed decisions. We emphasize considering observation uncertainty in model calibration.
Hannes Müller Schmied, Tim Trautmann, Sebastian Ackermann, Denise Cáceres, Martina Flörke, Helena Gerdener, Ellen Kynast, Thedini Asali Peiris, Leonie Schiebener, Maike Schumacher, and Petra Döll
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8817–8852, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8817-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8817-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Assessing water availability and water use at the global scale is challenging but essential for a range of purposes. We describe the newest version of the global hydrological model WaterGAP, which has been used for numerous water resource assessments since 1996. We show the effects of new model features, as well as model evaluations, against water abstraction statistics and observed streamflow and water storage anomalies. The publicly available model output for several variants is described.
Emmanuel Nyenah, Petra Döll, Daniel S. Katz, and Robert Reinecke
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8593–8611, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8593-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8593-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Research software is vital for scientific progress but is often developed by scientists with limited skills, time, and funding, leading to challenges in usability and maintenance. Our study across 10 sectors shows strengths in version control, open-source licensing, and documentation while emphasizing the need for containerization and code quality. We recommend workshops; code quality metrics; funding; and following the findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (FAIR) standards.
Jenny Kupzig, Nina Kupzig, and Martina Flörke
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6819–6846, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6819-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6819-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Valid simulation results from global hydrological models (GHMs) are essential, e.g., to studying climate change impacts. Adapting GHMs to ungauged basins requires regionalization, enabling valid simulations. In this study, we highlight the impact of regionalization of GHMs on runoff simulations using an ensemble of regionalization methods for WaterGAP3. We have found that regionalization leads to temporally and spatially varying uncertainty, potentially reaching up to inter-model differences.
Petra Döll, Howlader Mohammad Mehedi Hasan, Kerstin Schulze, Helena Gerdener, Lara Börger, Somayeh Shadkam, Sebastian Ackermann, Seyed-Mohammad Hosseini-Moghari, Hannes Müller Schmied, Andreas Güntner, and Jürgen Kusche
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2259–2295, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2259-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2259-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Currently, global hydrological models do not benefit from observations of model output variables to reduce and quantify model output uncertainty. For the Mississippi River basin, we explored three approaches for using both streamflow and total water storage anomaly observations to adjust the parameter sets in a global hydrological model. We developed a method for considering the observation uncertainties to quantify the uncertainty of model output and provide recommendations.
Laura Müller and Petra Döll
Geosci. Commun., 7, 121–144, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-121-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-121-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
To be able to adapt to climate change, stakeholders need to be informed about future uncertain climate change hazards. Using freely available output of global hydrological models, we quantified future local changes in water resources and their uncertainty. To communicate these in participatory processes, we propose using "percentile boxes" to support the development of flexible strategies for climate risk management worldwide, involving stakeholders and scientists.
Katja Frieler, Jan Volkholz, Stefan Lange, Jacob Schewe, Matthias Mengel, María del Rocío Rivas López, Christian Otto, Christopher P. O. Reyer, Dirk Nikolaus Karger, Johanna T. Malle, Simon Treu, Christoph Menz, Julia L. Blanchard, Cheryl S. Harrison, Colleen M. Petrik, Tyler D. Eddy, Kelly Ortega-Cisneros, Camilla Novaglio, Yannick Rousseau, Reg A. Watson, Charles Stock, Xiao Liu, Ryan Heneghan, Derek Tittensor, Olivier Maury, Matthias Büchner, Thomas Vogt, Tingting Wang, Fubao Sun, Inga J. Sauer, Johannes Koch, Inne Vanderkelen, Jonas Jägermeyr, Christoph Müller, Sam Rabin, Jochen Klar, Iliusi D. Vega del Valle, Gitta Lasslop, Sarah Chadburn, Eleanor Burke, Angela Gallego-Sala, Noah Smith, Jinfeng Chang, Stijn Hantson, Chantelle Burton, Anne Gädeke, Fang Li, Simon N. Gosling, Hannes Müller Schmied, Fred Hattermann, Jida Wang, Fangfang Yao, Thomas Hickler, Rafael Marcé, Don Pierson, Wim Thiery, Daniel Mercado-Bettín, Robert Ladwig, Ana Isabel Ayala-Zamora, Matthew Forrest, and Michel Bechtold
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1–51, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Our paper provides an overview of all observational climate-related and socioeconomic forcing data used as input for the impact model evaluation and impact attribution experiments within the third round of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project. The experiments are designed to test our understanding of observed changes in natural and human systems and to quantify to what degree these changes have already been induced by climate change.
Thedini Asali Peiris and Petra Döll
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3663–3686, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3663-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3663-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrological models often overlook vegetation's response to CO2 and climate, impairing their ability to forecast impacts on evapotranspiration and water resources. To address this, we suggest involving two model variants: (1) the standard method and (2) a modified approach (proposed here) based on the Priestley–Taylor equation (PT-MA). While not universally applicable, a dual approach helps consider uncertainties related to vegetation responses to climate change, enhancing model representation.
Kedar Otta, Hannes Müller Schmied, Simon N. Gosling, and Naota Hanasaki
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-215, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-215, 2023
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
Reservoirs play important roles in hydrology and water resources management globally and are incorporated into many Global Hydrological Models. Their simulations are, however, poorly validated due to the lack of available long-term in-situ observation data globally. Here we investigated the applicability of the latest satellite-based reservoir storage estimations in the contiguous US. We found that those products are useful for validating reservoir storage simulations when they are normalized.
Claudia Herbert and Petra Döll
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2111–2131, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2111-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2111-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents a new method for selecting streamflow drought hazard indicators for monitoring drought hazard for human water supply and river ecosystems in large-scale drought early warning systems. Indicators are classified by their inherent assumptions about the habituation of people and ecosystems to the streamflow regime and their level of drought characterization, namely drought magnitude (water deficit at a certain point in time) and severity (cumulated magnitude since drought onset).
Vili Virkki, Elina Alanärä, Miina Porkka, Lauri Ahopelto, Tom Gleeson, Chinchu Mohan, Lan Wang-Erlandsson, Martina Flörke, Dieter Gerten, Simon N. Gosling, Naota Hanasaki, Hannes Müller Schmied, Niko Wanders, and Matti Kummu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3315–3336, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3315-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3315-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Direct and indirect human actions have altered streamflow across the world since pre-industrial times. Here, we apply a method of environmental flow envelopes (EFEs) that develops the existing global environmental flow assessments by methodological advances and better consideration of uncertainty. By assessing the violations of the EFE, we comprehensively quantify the frequency, severity, and trends of flow alteration during the past decades, illustrating anthropogenic effects on streamflow.
Martin Horwath, Benjamin D. Gutknecht, Anny Cazenave, Hindumathi Kulaiappan Palanisamy, Florence Marti, Ben Marzeion, Frank Paul, Raymond Le Bris, Anna E. Hogg, Inès Otosaka, Andrew Shepherd, Petra Döll, Denise Cáceres, Hannes Müller Schmied, Johnny A. Johannessen, Jan Even Øie Nilsen, Roshin P. Raj, René Forsberg, Louise Sandberg Sørensen, Valentina R. Barletta, Sebastian B. Simonsen, Per Knudsen, Ole Baltazar Andersen, Heidi Ranndal, Stine K. Rose, Christopher J. Merchant, Claire R. Macintosh, Karina von Schuckmann, Kristin Novotny, Andreas Groh, Marco Restano, and Jérôme Benveniste
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 411–447, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-411-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-411-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Global mean sea-level change observed from 1993 to 2016 (mean rate of 3.05 mm yr−1) matches the combined effect of changes in water density (thermal expansion) and ocean mass. Ocean-mass change has been assessed through the contributions from glaciers, ice sheets, and land water storage or directly from satellite data since 2003. Our budget assessments of linear trends and monthly anomalies utilise new datasets and uncertainty characterisations developed within ESA's Climate Change Initiative.
Tom Gleeson, Thorsten Wagener, Petra Döll, Samuel C. Zipper, Charles West, Yoshihide Wada, Richard Taylor, Bridget Scanlon, Rafael Rosolem, Shams Rahman, Nurudeen Oshinlaja, Reed Maxwell, Min-Hui Lo, Hyungjun Kim, Mary Hill, Andreas Hartmann, Graham Fogg, James S. Famiglietti, Agnès Ducharne, Inge de Graaf, Mark Cuthbert, Laura Condon, Etienne Bresciani, and Marc F. P. Bierkens
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 7545–7571, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7545-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7545-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Groundwater is increasingly being included in large-scale (continental to global) land surface and hydrologic simulations. However, it is challenging to evaluate these simulations because groundwater is
hiddenunderground and thus hard to measure. We suggest using multiple complementary strategies to assess the performance of a model (
model evaluation).
Camelia-Eliza Telteu, Hannes Müller Schmied, Wim Thiery, Guoyong Leng, Peter Burek, Xingcai Liu, Julien Eric Stanislas Boulange, Lauren Seaby Andersen, Manolis Grillakis, Simon Newland Gosling, Yusuke Satoh, Oldrich Rakovec, Tobias Stacke, Jinfeng Chang, Niko Wanders, Harsh Lovekumar Shah, Tim Trautmann, Ganquan Mao, Naota Hanasaki, Aristeidis Koutroulis, Yadu Pokhrel, Luis Samaniego, Yoshihide Wada, Vimal Mishra, Junguo Liu, Petra Döll, Fang Zhao, Anne Gädeke, Sam S. Rabin, and Florian Herz
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3843–3878, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3843-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3843-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We analyse water storage compartments, water flows, and human water use sectors included in 16 global water models that provide simulations for the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project phase 2b. We develop a standard writing style for the model equations. We conclude that even though hydrologic processes are often based on similar equations, in the end these equations have been adjusted, or the models have used different values for specific parameters or specific variables.
Eklavyya Popat and Petra Döll
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1337–1354, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-1337-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-1337-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Two drought hazard indices are presented that combine drought deficit and anomaly aspects: one for soil moisture drought (SMDAI) where we simplified the DSI and the other for streamflow drought (QDAI), which is to our knowledge the first ever deficit anomaly drought index including surface water demand. Both indices are tested at the global scale with WaterGAP 2.2d outputs, providing more differentiated spatial and temporal patterns distinguishing the actual degree of respective drought hazard.
Robert Reinecke, Hannes Müller Schmied, Tim Trautmann, Lauren Seaby Andersen, Peter Burek, Martina Flörke, Simon N. Gosling, Manolis Grillakis, Naota Hanasaki, Aristeidis Koutroulis, Yadu Pokhrel, Wim Thiery, Yoshihide Wada, Satoh Yusuke, and Petra Döll
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 787–810, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-787-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-787-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Billions of people rely on groundwater as an accessible source of drinking water and for irrigation, especially in times of drought. Groundwater recharge is the primary process of regenerating groundwater resources. We find that groundwater recharge will increase in northern Europe by about 19 % and decrease by 10 % in the Amazon with 3 °C global warming. In the Mediterranean, a 2 °C warming has already lead to a reduction in recharge by 38 %. However, these model predictions are uncertain.
Denise Cáceres, Ben Marzeion, Jan Hendrik Malles, Benjamin Daniel Gutknecht, Hannes Müller Schmied, and Petra Döll
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4831–4851, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4831-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4831-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We analysed how and to which extent changes in water storage on continents had an effect on global ocean mass over the period 1948–2016. Continents lost water to oceans at an accelerated rate, inducing sea level rise. Shrinking glaciers explain 81 % of the long-term continental water mass loss, while declining groundwater levels, mainly due to sustained groundwater pumping for irrigation, is the second major driver. This long-term decline was partly offset by the impoundment of water in dams.
Marco Cucchi, Graham P. Weedon, Alessandro Amici, Nicolas Bellouin, Stefan Lange, Hannes Müller Schmied, Hans Hersbach, and Carlo Buontempo
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 2097–2120, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2097-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2097-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
WFDE5 is a novel meteorological forcing dataset for running land surface and global hydrological models. It has been generated using the WATCH Forcing Data methodology applied to surface meteorological variables from the ERA5 reanalysis. It is publicly available, along with its source code, through the C3S Climate Data Store at ECMWF. Results of the evaluations described in the paper highlight the benefits of using WFDE5 compared to both ERA5 and its predecessor WFDEI.
Cited articles
Adam, L.: Modeling water storage dynamics in large floodplains and wetlands, PhD thesis, Goethe-University Frankfurt, 2017. a
Alcamo, J., Döll, P., Henrichs, T., Kaspar, F., Lehner, B., Rösch, T., and Siebert, S.: Development and testing of the WaterGAP 2 global model of water use and availability, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 48, 317–337, https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.48.3.317.45290, 2003. a, b
Allen, P. M., Arnold, J. C., and Byars, B. W.: Downstream channel geometry for use in planning level models, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 30, 663–671, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1994.tb03321.x, 1994. a, b
ArcGIS: Worldmask, available at:
https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=0c667b0505774b8992336dbd9dccb951 (last access: 5 June 2020),
2018. a
Batjes, N.: Development of a world data set of soil water retention properties using pedotransfer rules, Geoderma, 71, 31–52,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(95)00089-5, 1996. a
Bergström, S.: The HBV model, in: Computer models of watershed
hydrology, edited by: Singh, V., Water Resources Publications,
Lone Tree, USA, 443–476, 1995. a
Bhat, T. A.: An analysis of demand and supply of water in India, J.
Environ. Earth Sci., 4, 67–72, 2014. a
Bierkens, M. F. P., Bell, V. A., Burek, P., Chaney, N., Condon, L. E., David,
C. H., de Roo, A., Döll, P., Drost, N., Famiglietti, J. S.,
Flörke, M., Gochis, D. J., Houser, P., Hut, R., Keune, J., Kollet, S., Maxwell, R. M., Reager, J. T., Samaniego, L., Sudicky, E., Sutanudjaja,
E. H., van de Giesen, N., Winsemius, H., and Wood, E. F.: Hyper-resolution
global hydrological modelling: what is next? “Everywhere and locally
relevant”, Hydrol. Process., 29, 310–320, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10391,
2015. a
Cáceres, D., Marzeion, B., Malles, J. H., Gutknecht, B. D., Müller Schmied, H., and Döll, P.: Assessing global water mass transfers from continents to oceans over the period 1948–2016, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4831–4851, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4831-2020, 2020. a, b, c
Cheng, M., Ries, J. C., and Tapley, B. D.: Variations of the Earth's figure
axis from satellite laser ranging and GRACE, J. Geophys.
Res.-Sol. Ea., 116, B01409, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JB000850, 2011. a
Cheng, M., Tapley, B. D., and Ries, J. C.: Deceleration in the Earth's
oblateness, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 118, 740–747,
https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrb.50058, 2013. a
CIESIN: Gridded population of the world version 3 (GPWv3): Population
count, available at: https://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/collection/gpw-v3 (last acces: 9 February 2021),
2016. a
Coxon, G., Freer, J., Westerberg, I. K., Wagener, T., Woods, R., and Smith,
P. J.: A novel framework for discharge uncertainty quantification applied to 500 UK gauging stations, Water Resour. Res., 51, 5531–5546,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016532, 2015. a, b, c, d
CSR: GRACE RL05 mascon solutions, available at:
http://www2.csr.utexas.edu/grace/RL05_mascons.html (last access: 5 March 2020), 2019. a
Cucchi, M., Weedon, G. P., Amici, A., Bellouin, N., Lange, S., Müller Schmied, H., Hersbach, H., and Buontempo, C.: WFDE5: bias-adjusted ERA5 reanalysis data for impact studies, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 2097–2120, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2097-2020, 2020. a
de Graaf, I. E., van Beek, R. L., Gleeson, T., Moosdorf, N., Schmitz, O.,
Sutanudjaja, E. H., and Bierkens, M. F.: A global-scale two-layer transient groundwater model: Development and application to groundwater depletion, Adv. Water Resour., 102, 53–67,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.01.011, 2017. a
Deardorff, J. W.: Efficient prediction of ground surface temperature and
moisture, with inclusion of a layer of vegetation, J. Geophys.
Res., 83, 1889, https://doi.org/10.1029/JC083iC04p01889, 1978. a, b
Döll, P.: Vulnerability to the impact of climate change on renewable
groundwater resources: a global-scale assessment, Environ. Res.
Lett., 4, 035006, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/4/3/035006, 2009. a
Döll, P.: The WaterGAP Website, available at: http://watergap.de, last access: 25 March 2020. a
Döll, P.: Cartograms facilitate communication of climate change risks
and responsibilities, Earths Future, 5, 1182–1195,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000677, 2017. a
Döll, P. and Fiedler, K.: Global-scale modeling of groundwater recharge, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 863–885, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-12-863-2008, 2008. a, b, c
Döll, P. and Lehner, B.: Validation of a new global 30-min drainage
direction map, J. Hydrol., 258, 214–231,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00565-0, 2002. a, b, c
Döll, P. and Zhang, J.: Impact of climate change on freshwater ecosystems: a global-scale analysis of ecologically relevant river flow alterations, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 783–799, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-783-2010, 2010. a
Döll, P., Hoffmann-Dobrev, H., Portmann, F., Siebert, S., Eicker, A.,
Rodell, M., Strassberg, G., and Scanlon, B.: Impact of water withdrawals
from groundwater and surface water on continental water storage variations, J. Geodyn., 59–60, 143–156, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2011.05.001,
2012. a, b, c, d, e, f, g
Döll, P., Müller Schmied, H., Schuh, C., Portmann, F. T., and
Eicker, A.: Global-scale assessment of groundwater depletion and related
groundwater abstractions: Combining hydrological modeling with information
from well observations and GRACE satellites, Water Resour. Res., 50,
5698–5720, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015595, 2014. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p, q
Döll, P., Douville, H., Güntner, A., Müller Schmied, H., and Wada, Y.: Modelling freshwater resources at the global scale: Challenges and prospects, Surv. Geophys., 37, 195–221,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-015-9343-1, 2016. a, b
Döll, P., Trautmann, T., Gerten, D., Müller Schmied, H., Ostberg, S., Saaed, F., and Schleussner, C. F.: Risks for the global freshwater system at 1.5 ∘C and 2 ∘C global warming, Environ. Res. Lett., 13, 044038, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab792, 2018. a, b
Döll, P., Trautmann, T., Göllner, M., and Müller Schmied, H.: A
global-scale analysis of water storage dynamics of inland wetlands:
Quantifying the impacts of human water use and man-made reservoirs as well as the unavoidable and avoidable impacts of climate change, Ecohydrology, 13, 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2175, 2020. a, b
Dörr, P.: Einsatz von MODIS-Fernerkundungsdaten zur Verbesserung der
Berechnung der aktuellen Evapotranspiration in WaterGAP – Eine
Potentialanalyse, PhD thesis, Goethe-University Frankfurt, 2015. a
Dziegielewski, B., Sharma, S., Bik, T., Margono, H., and Yang, X.: Analysis of water use trends in the Unites States: 1950–1995, Special Report 28,
Illinois Water Resources Center, University of Illinois, USA, 2002. a
EIA: International Energy Statistics, available at:
http://www.eia.gov/cfapps/ipdbproject/IEDIndex3.cfm?tid=2&pid=2&aid=12 (last access: 8 February 2020),
2012. a
Eicker, A., Schumacher, M., Kusche, J., Döll, P., and Müller Schmied, H.:
Calibration/data assimilation approach for integrating GRACE data into the
WaterGAP global hydrology model (WGHM) using an Ensemble Kalman Filter: First results, Surv. Geophys., 35, 1285–1309,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-014-9309-8, 2014. a
FAO: AQUASTAT Main Database, available at:
http://www.fao.org/nr/water/aquastat/data/query/index.html?lang=en (last access: 5 June 2020),
2016. a
FAOSTAT: Live Animals and Livestock Primary,
available at: http://faostat.fao.org/site/339/default.aspx (last access: 5 June 2020), 2014. a
Flörke, M., Bärlund, I., and Kynast, E.: Will climate change
affect the electricity production sector? A European study, J. Water Clim. Change, 3, 44–54, https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2012.066, 2012. a
Flörke, M., Kynast, E., Bärlund, I., Eisner, S., Wimmer, F., and
Alcamo, J.: Domestic and industrial water uses of the past 60 years as a
mirror of socio-economic development: A global simulation study, Global
Environ. Chang., 23, 144–156, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.10.018, 2013. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h
Flörke, M., Schneider, C., and Mcdonald, R.: Water competition between
cities and agriculture driven by climate change and urban growth, Nat.
Sustain., 1, 51–58, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-017-0006-8, 2018. a
Friedl, M. A., Sulla-Menashe, D., Tan, B., Schneider, A., Ramankutty, N.,
Sibley, A., and Huang, X.: MODIS Collection 5 global land cover: Algorithm
refinements and characterization of new datasets, Remote Sens.
Environ., 114, 168–182, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.08.016,
2010. a
Frieler, K., Lange, S., Piontek, F., Reyer, C. P. O., Schewe, J., Warszawski, L., Zhao, F., Chini, L., Denvil, S., Emanuel, K., Geiger, T., Halladay, K., Hurtt, G., Mengel, M., Murakami, D., Ostberg, S., Popp, A., Riva, R., Stevanovic, M., Suzuki, T., Volkholz, J., Burke, E., Ciais, P., Ebi, K., Eddy, T. D., Elliott, J., Galbraith, E., Gosling, S. N., Hattermann, F., Hickler, T., Hinkel, J., Hof, C., Huber, V., Jägermeyr, J., Krysanova, V., Marcé, R., Müller Schmied, H., Mouratiadou, I., Pierson, D., Tittensor, D. P., Vautard, R., van Vliet, M., Biber, M. F., Betts, R. A., Bodirsky, B. L., Deryng, D., Frolking, S., Jones, C. D., Lotze, H. K., Lotze-Campen, H., Sahajpal, R., Thonicke, K., Tian, H., and Yamagata, Y.: Assessing the impacts of 1.5 °C global warming – simulation protocol of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP2b), Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4321–4345, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4321-2017, 2017. a
Geruo, A., Wahr, J., and Zhong, S.: Computations of the viscoelastic response of a 3-D compressible Earth to surface loading: an application to Glacial Isostatic Adjustment in Antarctica and Canada, Geophys. J.
Int., 192, 557–572, https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggs030, 2012. a
Goldewijk, K. K., Beusen, A., and Janssen, P.: Long-term dynamic modeling of
global population and built-up area in a spatially explicit way: HYDE 3.1,
Holocene, 20, 565–573, https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683609356587, 2010. a
Greve, P., Kahil, T., Mochizuki, J., Schinko, T., Satoh, Y., Burek, P.,
Fischer, G., Tramberend, S., Burtscher, R., Langan, S., and Wada, Y.: Global assessment of water challenges under uncertainty in water scarcity
projections, Nat. Sustain., 1, 486–494,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0134-9, 2018. a
Gupta, H. V., Kling, H., Yilmaz, K. K., and Martinez, G. F.: Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for
improving hydrological modelling, J. Hydrol., 377, 80–91,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003, 2009. a
Haddeland, I., Clark, D. B., Franssen, W., Ludwig, F., Voß, F., Arnell,
N. W., Bertrand, N., Best, M., Folwell, S., Gerten, D., Gomes, S., Gosling,
S. N., Hagemann, S., Hanasaki, N., Harding, R., Heinke, J., Kabat, P.,
Koirala, S., Oki, T., Polcher, J., Stacke, T., Viterbo, P., Weedon, G. P.,
and Yeh, P.: Multimodel Estimate of the Global Terrestrial Water Balance:
Setup and First Results, J. Hydrometeorol., 12, 869–884,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JHM1324.1, 2011. a
Hanasaki, N., Kanae, S., and Oki, T.: A reservoir operation scheme for global river routing models, J. Hydrol., 327, 22–41,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.11.011, 2006. a, b, c
Herbert, C. and Döll, P.: Global assessment of current and future
groundwater stress with a focus on transboundary aquifers, Water Resour.
Res., 55, 4760–4784, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023321, 2019. a
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A.,
Muñoz‐Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D.,
Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P.,
Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D.,
Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer,
A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková,
M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., Rosnay, P.,
Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.: The ERA5 global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146,
1999–2049, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803, 2020. a
Hoff, H., Döll, P., Fader, M., Gerten, D., Hauser, S., and Siebert, S.: Water footprints of cities – indicators for sustainable consumption and production, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 213–226, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-213-2014, 2014. a, b
JPL: Monthly mass grids – global mascons (JPL RL06v02), available at:
https://grace.jpl.nasa.gov/data/get-data/jpl_global_mascons/, last access: 5 June 2020. a
Kim, H.: Global soil wetness project phase 3, available at:
http://hydro.iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp/GSWP3/index.html (last access: 25 March 2020), 2014. a
Kling, H., Fuchs, M., and Paulin, M.: Runoff conditions in the upper Danube
basin under an ensemble of climate change scenarios, J. Hydrol.,
424–425, 264–277, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.01.011, 2012. a
Krysanova, V., Donnelly, C., Gelfan, A., Gerten, D., Arheimer, B., Hattermann,
F., and Kundzewicz, Z. W.: How the performance of hydrological models
relates to credibility of projections under climate change, Hydrol.
Sci. J., 63, 696–720, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2018.1446214,
2018. a
Krysanova, V., Zaherpour, J., Didovets, I., Gosling, S. N., Gerten, D.,
Hanasaki, N., Müller Schmied, H., Pokhrel, Y., Satoh, Y., Tang, Q., and Wada, Y.: How evaluation of global hydrological models can help to improve credibility of river discharge projections under climate change, Climatic Change, 163, 1353–1377, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02840-0, 2020. a
Lange, S.: EartH2Observe, WFDEI and ERA-Interim data Merged and Bias-corrected for ISIMIP (EWEMBI), GFZ Data Services, https://doi.org/10.5880/pik.2019.004, 2019. a
Lehner, B. and Döll, P.: Development and validation of a global database of lakes, reservoirs and wetlands, J. Hydrol., 296, 1–22,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.03.028, 2004. a, b, c, d
Lehner, B., Verdin, K., and Jarvis, A.: New global hydrography derived from
spaceborne elevation data, Eos T. Am. Geophys. Un., 89, 93, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008EO100001, 2008. a
Lehner, B., Liermann, C. R., Revenga, C., Vörösmarty, C., Fekete,
B., Crouzet, P., Döll, P., Endejan, M., Frenken, K., Magome, J.,
Nilsson, C., Robertson, J. C., Rödel, R., Sindorf, N., and Wisser, D.:
High-resolution mapping of the world's reservoirs and dams for sustainable
river-flow management, Front. Ecol. Environ., 9,
494–502, https://doi.org/10.1890/100125, 2011. a, b, c
Luthcke, S. B., Sabaka, T., Loomis, B., Arendt, A., McCarthy, J., and Camp, J.:
Antarctica, Greenland and Gulf of Alaska land-ice evolution from an iterated GRACE global mascon solution, J. Glaciol., 59, 613–631,
https://doi.org/10.3189/2013JoG12J147, 2013. a
Maniak, U.: Hydrologie und Wasserwirtschaft - Eine Einführung für Ingenieure, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07829-7, 1997. a
Meza, I., Siebert, S., Döll, P., Kusche, J., Herbert, C., Eyshi Rezaei, E., Nouri, H., Gerdener, H., Popat, E., Frischen, J., Naumann, G., Vogt, J. V., Walz, Y., Sebesvari, Z., and Hagenlocher, M.: Global-scale drought risk assessment for agricultural systems, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 695–712, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-695-2020, 2020. a
Middleton, N. and Thomas, D.: World Atlas of Desertification, Arnold, London, 1997. a
Mitchell, T. D. and Jones, P. D.: An improved method of constructing a
database of monthly climate observations and associated high-resolution
grids, Int. J. Clim., 25, 693–712, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1181, 2005. a
MODIS: Moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer, available at:
https://modis.gsfc.nasa.gov/, last access: 14 April 2020. a
Müller Schmied, H., Eisner, S., Franz, D., Wattenbach, M., Portmann, F. T., Flörke, M., and Döll, P.: Sensitivity of simulated global-scale freshwater fluxes and storages to input data, hydrological model structure, human water use and calibration, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 3511–3538, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3511-2014, 2014. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m
Müller Schmied, H., Adam, L., Eisner, S., Fink, G., Flörke, M., Kim, H., Oki, T., Portmann, F. T., Reinecke, R., Riedel, C., Song, Q., Zhang, J., and Döll, P.: Variations of global and continental water balance components as impacted by climate forcing uncertainty and human water use, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 2877–2898, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2877-2016, 2016a. a, b, c, d, e, f
Müller Schmied, H., Müller, R., Sanchez-Lorenzo, A., Ahrens, B.,
and Wild, M.: Evaluation of radiation components in a global freshwater
model with station-based observations, Water, 8, 450,
https://doi.org/10.3390/w8100450, 2016b. a
Müller Schmied, H., Cáceres, D., Eisner, S., Flörke, M., Herbert, C., Niemann, C., Peiris, T. A., Popat, E., Portmann, F. T., Reinecke, R., Shadkam, S., Trautmann, T., and Döll, P.: The global water resources and use model WaterGAP v2.2d – Standard model output, PANGAEA, available at:
https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.918447, 2020. a
NASA: Earth Sciences – Geodesy and Geophysics, available at:
https://neptune.gsfc.nasa.gov/gngphys/index.php?section=470, last access: 14 April 2020. a
Nash, J. and Sutcliffe, J.: River flow forecasting through conceptual models
part I – A discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10, 282–290,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6, 1970. a, b
Pascolini-Campbell, M. A., Reager, J. T., and Fisher, J. B.: GRACE-based mass conservation as a validation target for basin-scale evapotranspiration in the contiguous united states, Water Resour. Res., 56, e2019WR026594,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026594, 2020. a
Portmann, F. T., Siebert, S., and Döll, P.: MIRCA2000—Global monthly
irrigated and rainfed crop areas around the year 2000: A new high-resolution data set for agricultural and hydrological modeling, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 24, GB1011, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003435, 2010. a
Portmann, F. T., Döll, P., Eisner, S., and Flörke, M.: Impact of
climate change on renewable groundwater resources: assessing the benefits of avoided greenhouse gas emissions using selected CMIP5 climate projections, Environ. Res. Lett., 8, 024023,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024023, 2013. a
Reinecke, R., Foglia, L., Mehl, S., Trautmann, T., Cáceres, D., and Döll, P.: Challenges in developing a global gradient-based groundwater model (G3M v1.0) for the integration into a global hydrological model, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2401–2418, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2401-2019, 2019. a, b
Richard Peltier, W., Argus, D. F., and Drummond, R.: Comment on “An Assessment of the ICE-6G_C (VM5a) Glacial Isostatic Adjustment Model” by Purcell et al., J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 123, 2019–2028,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB013844, 2018. a
Save, H., Bettadpur, S., and Tapley, B. D.: High-resolution CSR GRACE RL05
mascons, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 121, 7547–7569,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB013007, 2016. a
Scanlon, B. R., Zhang, Z., Save, H., Sun, A. Y., Müller Schmied, H., Van Beek,
L. P., Wiese, D. N., Wada, Y., Long, D., Reedy, R. C., Longuevergne, L.,
Döll, P., and Bierkens, M. F.: Global models underestimate large
decadal declining and rising water storage trends relative to GRACE satellite data, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, E1080–E1089, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704665115, 2018. a
Scanlon, B. R., Zhang, Z., Rateb, A., Sun, A., Wiese, D., Save, H., Beaudoing,
H., Lo, M. H., Müller Schmied, H., Döll, P., van Beek, R.,
Swenson, S., Lawrence, D., Croteau, M., and Reedy, R. C.: Tracking Seasonal Fluctuations in Land Water Storage Using Global Models and GRACE Satellites, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 5254–5264, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL081836, 2019. a
Schaphoff, S., Forkel, M., Müller, C., Knauer, J., von Bloh, W., Gerten, D., Jägermeyr, J., Lucht, W., Rammig, A., Thonicke, K., and Waha, K.: LPJmL4 – a dynamic global vegetation model with managed land – Part 2: Model evaluation, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1377–1403, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1377-2018, 2018a. a
Schaphoff, S., von Bloh, W., Rammig, A., Thonicke, K., Biemans, H., Forkel, M., Gerten, D., Heinke, J., Jägermeyr, J., Knauer, J., Langerwisch, F., Lucht, W., Müller, C., Rolinski, S., and Waha, K.: LPJmL4 – a dynamic global vegetation model with managed land – Part 1: Model description, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1343–1375, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1343-2018, 2018b. a
Schewe, J., Gosling, S. N., Reyer, C., Zhao, F., Ciais, P., Elliott, J.,
Francois, L., Huber, V., Lotze, H. K., Seneviratne, S. I., van Vliet, M. T., Vautard, R., Wada, Y., Breuer, L., Büchner, M., Carozza, D. A., Chang, J., Coll, M., Deryng, D., de Wit, A., Eddy, T. D., Folberth, C., Frieler, K., Friend, A. D., Gerten, D., Gudmundsson, L., Hanasaki, N., Ito, A., Khabarov, N., Kim, H., Lawrence, P., Morfopoulos, C., Müller, C., Müller Schmied, H., Orth, R., Ostberg, S., Pokhrel, Y., Pugh, T. A., Sakurai, G., Satoh, Y., Schmid, E., Stacke, T., Steenbeek, J., Steinkamp, J., Tang, Q., Tian, H., Tittensor, D. P., Volkholz, J., Wang, X., and Warszawski,
L.: State-of-the-art global models underestimate impacts from climate
extremes, Nat. Commun., 10, 1–14,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08745-6, 2019. a
Schneider, C., Flörke, M., Eisner, S., and Voss, F.: Large scale
modelling of bankfull flow: An example for Europe, J. Hydrol.,
408, 235–245, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.08.004, 2011. a
Schneider, U., Becker, A., Finger, P., Meyer-Christoffer, A., Rudolf, B., and
Ziese, M.: GPCC full data monthly product version 7.0 at 0.5∘:
Monthly land-surface precipitation from rain-gauges built on GTS-based and
historic data, https://doi.org/10.5676/DWD_GPCC/FD_M_V7_050, 2015. a
Schulze, E., Kelliher, F. M., Korner, C., Lloyd, J., and Leuning, R.:
Relationships among maximum stomatal conductance, ecosystem surface
conductance, carbon assimilation rate, and plant nitrogen nutrition: A global ecology scaling exercise, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 25, 629–662, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.25.110194.003213, 1994. a
Schulze, K. and Döll, P.: Neue Ansätze zur Modellierung von
Schneeakkumulation und -schmelze im globalen Wassermodell WaterGAP, in:
Tagungsband zum 7. Workshop zur großskaligen Modellierung in der
Hydrologie, edited by: Ludwig, R., Reichert, D., and Mauser, W., November
2003, 145–154, Kassel University Press, Kassel, 2004. a, b, c
Schulze, K., Hunger, M., and Döll, P.: Simulating river flow velocity on global scale, Adv. Geosci., 5, 133–136, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-5-133-2005, 2005. a
Schumacher, M., Forootan, E., van Dijk, A., Müller Schmied, H., Crosbie, R., Kusche, J., and Döll, P.: Improving drought simulations within the Murray-Darling Basin by combined calibration/assimilation of GRACE data into the WaterGAP Global Hydrology Model, Remote Sens. Environ., 204, 212–228, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.10.029, 2018. a
Sheffield, J., Goteti, G., and Wood, E. F.: Development of a 50-year
high-resolution global dataset of meteorological forcings for land surface
modeling, J. Climate, 19, 3088–3111, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3790.1,
2006. a
Shiklomanov, L.: World water resources and water use: Present assessment and
outlook for 2025, in: World Water Scenarios Analyses, edited by: Rijsberman, F., p. 396, Earthscan Publications, London (Supplemental data on CD-ROM: Shiklomanov, I., World freshwater resources, available from: International Hydrological Programme, UNESCO, Paris, 2000. a
Siebert, S., Döll, P., Hoogeveen, J., Faures, J.-M., Frenken, K., and Feick, S.: Development and validation of the global map of irrigation areas, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 9, 535–547, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-9-535-2005, 2005. a
Siebert, S., Burke, J., Faures, J. M., Frenken, K., Hoogeveen, J., Döll, P., and Portmann, F. T.: Groundwater use for irrigation – a global inventory, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 1863–1880, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1863-2010, 2010. a
Siebert, S., Henrich, V., Frenken, K., and Burke, J.: Update of the digital
global map of irrigation areas to version 5., Tech. rep., Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation, Bonn, https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2660.6728, 2013. a, b
Siebert, S., Kummu, M., Porkka, M., Döll, P., Ramankutty, N., and Scanlon, B. R.: A global data set of the extent of irrigated land from 1900 to 2005, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1521–1545, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1521-2015, 2015. a, b, c, d
Smith, M.: CROPWAT: A computer program for irrigation planning and
management, Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 46, FAO, Rome,
1992. a
Sutanudjaja, E. H., van Beek, R., Wanders, N., Wada, Y., Bosmans, J. H. C., Drost, N., van der Ent, R. J., de Graaf, I. E. M., Hoch, J. M., de Jong, K., Karssenberg, D., López López, P., Peßenteiner, S., Schmitz, O., Straatsma, M. W., Vannametee, E., Wisser, D., and Bierkens, M. F. P.: PCR-GLOBWB 2: a 5 arcmin global hydrological and water resources model, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2429–2453, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2429-2018, 2018. a
Swenson, S., Chambers, D., and Wahr, J.: Estimating geocenter variations from
a combination of GRACE and ocean model output, J. Geophys.
Res.-Sol. Ea., 113, B08410, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB005338, 2008. a
Telteu, C.-E., Müller Schmied, H., Thiery, W., Leng, G., Burek, P., Liu, X., Boulange, J. E. S., Seaby, L. P., Grillakis, M., Satoh, Y., Rakovec, O., Stacke, T., Chang, J., Wanders, N., Tao, F., Zhai, R., Shah, H. L., Trautmann, T., Mao, G., Koutroulis, A., Pokhrel, Y., Samaniego, L., Wada, Y., Mishra, V., Liu, J., Newland Gosling, S., Schewe, J., and Zhao, F.: Similarities and differences among fifteen global water models in simulating the vertical water balance, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-7549, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-7549, 2020. a
Telteu, C.-E., Müller Schmied, H., Thiery, W., Leng, G., Burek, P., Liu, X., Boulange, J. E. S., Seaby Andersen, L., Grillakis, M., Gosling, S. N., Satoh, Y., Rakovec, O., Stacke, T., Chang, J., Wanders, N., Shah, H. L., Trautmann, T., Mao, G., Hanasaki, N., Koutroulis, A., Pokhrel, Y., Samaniego, L., Wada, Y., Mishra, V., Liu, J., Döll, P., Zhao, F., Gädeke, A., Rabin, S., and Herz, F.: Understanding each other's models: a standard representation of global water models to support improvement, intercomparison, and communication, Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-367, in review, 2021. a
UDI: World Electric Power Plants Database, available at:
http://www.platts.com (last access: 5 June 2020), 2004. a
UNEP: The Environmental Data Explorer, as compiled from United Nations
Population Division, available at: http://ede.grid.unep.ch, last access: 5 June 2015. a
Unidata: Network common data form (netCDF) version 4,
https://doi.org/10.5065/D6H70CW6, 2019. a
U.S. Geological Survey: USGS EROS archive – digital elevation – global 30
arc-second elevation (GTOPO30), available at:
https://www.usgs.gov/centers/eros/science/usgs-eros-archive-digital-elevation-global-30-arc-second-elevation-gtopo30?qt-science_center_objects=0#qt-science_center_objects
(last access: 25 MArch 2020), 1996. a
Van Beek, L. P., Eikelboom, T., Van Vliet, M. T., and Bierkens, M. F.: A
physically based model of global freshwater surface temperature, Water
Resour. Res., 48, W09530, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR011819, 2012. a
Veldkamp, T., Zhao, F., Ward, P., De Moel, H., Aerts, J., Müller Schmied, H.,
Portmann, F., Masaki, Y., Pokhrel, Y., Liu, X., Satoh, Y., Gerten, D.,
Gosling, S., Zaherpour, J., and Wada, Y.: Human impact parameterizations in global hydrological models improve estimates of monthly discharges and
hydrological extremes: A multi-model validation study, Environ.
Res. Lett., 13, 055008, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab96f, 2018. a, b
Veldkamp, T. I. E., Wada, Y., Aerts, J., Döll, P., Gosling, S. N., Liu,
J., Masaki, Y., Oki, T., Ostberg, S., Pokhrel, Y., Satoh, Y., Kim, H., and
Ward, P. J.: Water scarcity hotspots travel downstream due to human
interventions in the 20th and 21st century, Nat. Commun., 8,
15697, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15697, 2017. a, b
Verzano, K., Bärlund, I., Flörke, M., Lehner, B., Kynast, E.,
Voß, F., and Alcamo, J.: Modeling variable river flow velocity on
continental scale: Current situation and climate change impacts in Europe,
J. Hydrol., 424–425, 238–251, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.01.005, 2012. a, b, c
Vörösmarty, C. J., Hoekstra, A. Y., Bunn, S. E., Conway, D., and
Gupta, J.: Fresh water goes global, Science, 349, 478–479,
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac6009, 2015. a
Wada, Y., Bierkens, M. F. P., de Roo, A., Dirmeyer, P. A., Famiglietti, J. S., Hanasaki, N., Konar, M., Liu, J., Müller Schmied, H., Oki, T., Pokhrel, Y., Sivapalan, M., Troy, T. J., van Dijk, A. I. J. M., van Emmerik, T., Van Huijgevoort, M. H. J., Van Lanen, H. A. J., Vörösmarty, C. J., Wanders, N., and Wheater, H.: Human–water interface in hydrological modelling: current status and future directions, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 4169–4193, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-4169-2017, 2017. a
Wahr, J., Nerem, R. S., and Bettadpur, S. V.: The pole tide and its effect on GRACE time-variable gravity measurements: Implications for estimates of
surface mass variations, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 120, 4597–4615, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JB011986, 2015. a
Wanders, N., van Vliet, M. T., Wada, Y., Bierkens, M. F., and van Beek, L. P.: High-resolution global water temperature modeling, Water Resour.
Res., 55, 2760–2778, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023250, 2019. a
Wang, F., Polcher, J., Peylin, P., and Bastrikov, V.: Assimilation of river discharge in a land surface model to improve estimates of the continental water cycles, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3863–3882, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3863-2018, 2018. a
Wartenburger, R., Seneviratne, S. I., Hirschi, M., Chang, J., Ciais, P.,
Deryng, D., Elliott, J., Folberth, C., Gosling, S. N., Gudmundsson, L.,
Henrot, A.-J., Hickler, T., Ito, A., Khabarov, N., Kim, H., Leng, G., Liu,
J., Liu, X., Masaki, Y., Morfopoulos, C., Müller, C., Müller Schmied, H.,
Nishina, K., Orth, R., Pokhrel, Y., Pugh, T. A. M., Satoh, Y., Schaphoff, S., Schmid, E., Sheffield, J., Stacke, T., Steinkamp, J., Tang, Q., Thiery, W., Wada, Y., Wang, X., Weedon, G. P., Yang, H., and Zhou, T.:
Evapotranspiration simulations in ISIMIP2a–Evaluation of spatio-temporal
characteristics with a comprehensive ensemble of independent datasets,
Environ. Res. Lett., 13, 075001, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac4bb, 2018. a
Watkins, M. M., Wiese, D. N., Yuan, D. N., Boening, C., and Landerer, F. W.:
Improved methods for observing Earth's time variable mass distribution with GRACE using spherical cap mascons, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 120, 2648–2671, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JB011547, 2015.
a
Weedon, G. P., Gomes, S., Viterbo, P., Shuttleworth, W. J., Blyth, E.,
Österle, H., Adam, J. C., Bellouin, N., Boucher, O., and Best, M.:
Creation of the WATCH Forcing Data and its use to assess global and regional reference crop evaporation over land during the twentieth century, J. Hydrometeorol., 12, 823–848, https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JHM1369.1, 2011. a, b
Weedon, G. P., Balsamo, G., Bellouin, N., Gomes, S., Best, M. J., and Viterbo, P.: The WFDEI meteorological forcing data set: WATCH Forcing Data
methodology applied to ERA-Interim reanalysis data, Water Resour.
Res., 50, 7505–7514, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015638, 2014. a, b
Wiese, D. N., Landerer, F. W., and Watkins, M. M.: Quantifying and reducing
leakage errors in the JPL RL05M GRACE mascon solution, Water Resour.
Res., 52, 7490–7502, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019344, 2016. a
Wiese, D. N., Yuan, D. N., Boening, C., Landerer, F. W., and Watkins, M. M.:
JPL GRACE mascon ocean, ice, and hydrology equivalent water height release
06 coastal resolution improvement (CRI) filtered version 1.0,
https://doi.org/10.5067/temsc-3mjc6, 2018. a
Wilber, A. C., Kratz, D. P., and Gupta, S. K.: Surface emissivity maps for use in satellite retrievals of longwave radiation, Tech. rep., NASA Langley
Technical Report Server, 1999. a
WMO: Guide to hydrological practices, vol. I: Hydrology – from measurement
to hydrological information, and vol. II: Management of water resources and
application to hydrological practices, WMO, Geneva, 6th Edn., 2009. a
Wood, E. F., Roundy, J. K., Troy, T. J., van Beek, R. L. P. H., Bierkens, M.
F. P., Blyth, E., de Roo, A., Döll, P., Ek, M., Famiglietti, J.,
Gochis, D., van de Giesen, N., Houser, P., Jaffé, P. R., Kollet, S.,
Lehner, B., Lettenmaier, D. P., Peters-Lidard, C., Sivapalan, M., Sheffield, J., Wade, A., and Whitehead, P.: Hyperresolution global land surface modeling: Meeting a grand challenge for monitoring earth's terrestrial
water, Water Resour. Res., 47, W05301, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR010090, 2011. a
Zaherpour, J., Gosling, S. N., Mount, N., Müller Schmied, H., Veldkamp, T. I. E.,
Dankers, R., Eisner, S., Gerten, D., Gudmundsson, L., Haddeland, I.,
Hanasaki, N., Kim, H., Leng, G., Liu, J., Masaki, Y., Oki, T., Pokhrel, Y.,
Satoh, Y., Schewe, J., and Wada, Y.: Worldwide evaluation of mean and
extreme runoff from six global-scale hydrological models that account for
human impacts, Environ. Res. Lett., 13, 065015,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac547, 2018. a
Download
The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.
- Article
(3189 KB) - Full-text XML
- Corrigendum
-
Supplement
(1721 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Short summary
In a globalized world with large flows of virtual water between river basins and international responsibilities for the sustainable development of the Earth system and its inhabitants, quantitative estimates of water flows and storages and of water demand by humans are required. Global hydrological models such as WaterGAP are developed to provide this information. Here we present a thorough description, evaluation and application examples of the most recent model version, WaterGAP v2.2d.
In a globalized world with large flows of virtual water between river basins and international...
