Articles | Volume 12, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-933-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-933-2019
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
12 Mar 2019
Methods for assessment of models |  | 12 Mar 2019

ATAT 1.1, the Automated Timing Accordance Tool for comparing ice-sheet model output with geochronological data

Jeremy C. Ely, Chris D. Clark, David Small, and Richard C. A. Hindmarsh

Related authors

A Greenland-wide empirical reconstruction of paleo ice sheet retreat informed by ice extent markers: PaleoGrIS version 1.0
Tancrède P. M. Leger, Christopher D. Clark, Carla Huynh, Sharman Jones, Jeremy C. Ely, Sarah L. Bradley, Christiaan Diemont, and Anna L. C. Hughes
Clim. Past, 20, 701–755, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-20-701-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-20-701-2024, 2024
Short summary
Quantifying the uncertainty in the Eurasian ice-sheet geometry at the Penultimate Glacial Maximum (Marine Isotope Stage 6)
Oliver G. Pollard, Natasha L. M. Barlow, Lauren J. Gregoire, Natalya Gomez, Víctor Cartelle, Jeremy C. Ely, and Lachlan C. Astfalck
The Cryosphere, 17, 4751–4777, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4751-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4751-2023, 2023
Short summary
Surface mass balance modelling of the Juneau Icefield highlights the potential for rapid ice loss by the mid-21st century
Ryan N. Ing, Jeremy C. Ely, Julie M. Jones, and Bethan J. Davies
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2023-33,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2023-33, 2023
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Automated mapping of the seasonal evolution of surface meltwater and its links to climate on the Amery Ice Shelf, Antarctica
Peter A. Tuckett, Jeremy C. Ely, Andrew J. Sole, James M. Lea, Stephen J. Livingstone, Julie M. Jones, and J. Melchior van Wessem
The Cryosphere, 15, 5785–5804, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-5785-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-5785-2021, 2021
Short summary
Marine ice sheet instability and ice shelf buttressing of the Minch Ice Stream, northwest Scotland
Niall Gandy, Lauren J. Gregoire, Jeremy C. Ely, Christopher D. Clark, David M. Hodgson, Victoria Lee, Tom Bradwell, and Ruza F. Ivanovic
The Cryosphere, 12, 3635–3651, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3635-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3635-2018, 2018
Short summary

Related subject area

Cryosphere
SnowQM 1.0: a fast R package for bias-correcting spatial fields of snow water equivalent using quantile mapping
Adrien Michel, Johannes Aschauer, Tobias Jonas, Stefanie Gubler, Sven Kotlarski, and Christoph Marty
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8969–8988, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8969-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8969-2024, 2024
Short summary
Simulation of snow albedo and solar irradiance profile with the Two-streAm Radiative TransfEr in Snow (TARTES) v2.0 model
Ghislain Picard and Quentin Libois
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8927–8953, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8927-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8927-2024, 2024
Short summary
Evaluation of MITgcm-based ocean reanalyses for the Southern Ocean
Yoshihiro Nakayama, Alena Malyarenko, Hong Zhang, Ou Wang, Matthis Auger, Yafei Nie, Ian Fenty, Matthew Mazloff, Armin Köhl, and Dimitris Menemenlis
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8613–8638, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8613-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8613-2024, 2024
Short summary
Improvements in the land surface configuration to better simulate seasonal snow cover in the European Alps with the CNRM-AROME (cycle 46) convection-permitting regional climate model
Diego Monteiro, Cécile Caillaud, Matthieu Lafaysse, Adrien Napoly, Mathieu Fructus, Antoinette Alias, and Samuel Morin
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7645–7677, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7645-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7645-2024, 2024
Short summary
A three-stage model pipeline predicting regional avalanche danger in Switzerland (RAvaFcast v1.0.0): a decision-support tool for operational avalanche forecasting
Alessandro Maissen, Frank Techel, and Michele Volpi
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7569–7593, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7569-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7569-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Applegate, P. J., Kirchner, N., Stone, E. J., Keller, K., and Greve, R.: An assessment of key model parametric uncertainties in projections of Greenland Ice Sheet behavior, The Cryosphere, 6, 589–606, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-589-2012, 2012. 
Arnold, J. R. and Libby, W. F.: Radiocarbon dates, Science, 113, 111–120, 1951. 
Auriac, A., Whitehouse, P. L., Bentley, M. J., Patton, H., Lloyd, J. M., and Hubbard, A.: Glacial isostatic adjustment associated with the Barents Sea ice sheet: a modelling inter-comparison, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 147, 122–135, 2016. 
Balco, G.: Contributions and unrealized potential contributions of cosmogenic-nuclide exposure dating to glacier chronology, 1990–2010, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 30, 3–27, 2011. 
Bamber, J. L. and Aspinall, W. P.: An expert judgement assessment of future sea level rise from the ice sheets, Nat. Clim. Change, 3, 424–427, 2013. 
Download
Short summary
During the last 2.6 million years, the Earth's climate has cycled between cold glacials and warm interglacials, causing the growth and retreat of ice sheets. These ice sheets can be independently reconstructed using numerical models or from dated evidence that they leave behind (e.g. sediments, boulders). Here, we present a tool for comparing numerical model simulations with dated ice-sheet material. We demonstrate the utility of this tool by applying it to the last British–Irish ice sheet.