Articles | Volume 12, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-5267-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-5267-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Model description paper
| 
17 Dec 2019
Model description paper |
| 17 Dec 2019
| 17 Dec 2019
WAYS v1: a hydrological model for root zone water storage simulation on a global scale
Ganquan Mao
School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China
Junguo Liu
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China
Related authors
Hanqing Xu, Zhan Tian, Laixiang Sun, Qinghua Ye, Elisa Ragno, Jeremy Bricker, Ganquan Mao, Jinkai Tan, Jun Wang, Qian Ke, Shuai Wang, and Ralf Toumi
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2347–2358, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2347-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2347-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A hydrodynamic model and copula methodology were used to set up a joint distribution of the peak water level and the inland rainfall during tropical cyclone periods, and to calculate the marginal contributions of the individual drivers. The results indicate that the relative sea level rise has significantly amplified the peak water level. The astronomical tide is the leading driver, followed by the contribution from the storm surge.
Camelia-Eliza Telteu, Hannes Müller Schmied, Wim Thiery, Guoyong Leng, Peter Burek, Xingcai Liu, Julien Eric Stanislas Boulange, Lauren Seaby Andersen, Manolis Grillakis, Simon Newland Gosling, Yusuke Satoh, Oldrich Rakovec, Tobias Stacke, Jinfeng Chang, Niko Wanders, Harsh Lovekumar Shah, Tim Trautmann, Ganquan Mao, Naota Hanasaki, Aristeidis Koutroulis, Yadu Pokhrel, Luis Samaniego, Yoshihide Wada, Vimal Mishra, Junguo Liu, Petra Döll, Fang Zhao, Anne Gädeke, Sam S. Rabin, and Florian Herz
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3843–3878, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3843-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3843-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We analyse water storage compartments, water flows, and human water use sectors included in 16 global water models that provide simulations for the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project phase 2b. We develop a standard writing style for the model equations. We conclude that even though hydrologic processes are often based on similar equations, in the end these equations have been adjusted, or the models have used different values for specific parameters or specific variables.
Ganquan Mao, Junguo Liu, Feng Han, Ying Meng, Yong Tian, Yi Zheng, and Chunmiao Zheng
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2018-193, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2018-193, 2018
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Short summary
Apart from traditional water assessment, a new framework is proposed that assesses water resources beyond water balance and take into consideration of all the important factors as possible from perspective of both water supply and consumption.
The interaction between green and blue water plays a key role in the completed water cycling.
Natural ecosystems potentially take a higher risk on freshwater use when the water use competition increases between human and nature.
G. Tang, X. Zhu, B. Hu, J. Xin, L. Wang, C. Münkel, G. Mao, and Y. Wang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12667–12680, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12667-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12667-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
The manuscript is the first paper to validate and discuss the high-resolution vertical profiles of aerosols using a ceilometer in Beijing, China. We introduce the contribution of aerosols during different air pollution episodes in Beijing. Also, we seize the opportunity of emission reduction during APEC to study the contribution of aerosols. The results are helpful to provide guidance in redefining coordinated emission control strategies to control the regional pollution over northern China.
G. Mao, S. Vogl, P. Laux, S. Wagner, and H. Kunstmann
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1787–1806, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1787-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1787-2015, 2015
Hannes Müller Schmied, Simon Newland Gosling, Marlo Garnsworthy, Laura Müller, Camelia-Eliza Telteu, Atiq Kainan Ahmed, Lauren Seaby Andersen, Julien Boulange, Peter Burek, Jinfeng Chang, He Chen, Manolis Grillakis, Luca Guillaumot, Naota Hanasaki, Aristeidis Koutroulis, Rohini Kumar, Guoyong Leng, Junguo Liu, Xingcai Liu, Inga Menke, Vimal Mishra, Yadu Pokhrel, Oldrich Rakovec, Luis Samaniego, Yusuke Satoh, Harsh Lovekumar Shah, Mikhail Smilovic, Tobias Stacke, Edwin Sutanudjaja, Wim Thiery, Athanasios Tsilimigkras, Yoshihide Wada, Niko Wanders, and Tokuta Yokohata
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1303, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1303, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Global water models contribute to the evaluation of important natural and societal issues but are – as all models – simplified representation of the reality. So, there are many ways to calculate the water fluxes and storages. This paper presents a visualization of 16 global water models using a standardized visualization and the pathway towards this common understanding. Next to academic education purposes, we envisage that these diagrams will help researchers, model developers and data users.
Xinyu Chen, Liguang Jiang, Yuning Luo, and Junguo Liu
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 4463–4479, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4463-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4463-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
River flow is experiencing changes under the impacts of climate change and human activities. For example, flood events are occurring more often and are more destructive in many places worldwide. To deal with such issues, hydrologists endeavor to understand the features of extreme events as well as other hydrological changes. One key approach is analyzing flow characteristics, represented by hydrological indices. Building such a comprehensive global large-sample dataset is essential.
Zongjia Zhang, Jun Liang, Yujue Zhou, Zhejun Huang, Jie Jiang, Junguo Liu, and Lili Yang
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 4139–4165, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-4139-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-4139-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
An innovative multi-strategy-mode waterlogging-prediction framework for predicting waterlogging depth is proposed in the paper. The framework selects eight regression algorithms for comparison and tests the prediction accuracy and robustness of the model under different prediction strategies. Ultimately, the accuracy of predicting water depth after 30 min can exceed 86.1 %. This can aid decision-making in terms of issuing early warning information and determining emergency responses in advance.
Hanqin Tian, Zihao Bian, Hao Shi, Xiaoyu Qin, Naiqing Pan, Chaoqun Lu, Shufen Pan, Francesco N. Tubiello, Jinfeng Chang, Giulia Conchedda, Junguo Liu, Nathaniel Mueller, Kazuya Nishina, Rongting Xu, Jia Yang, Liangzhi You, and Bowen Zhang
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 4551–4568, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4551-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4551-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Nitrogen is one of the critical nutrients for growth. Evaluating the change in nitrogen inputs due to human activity is necessary for nutrient management and pollution control. In this study, we generated a historical dataset of nitrogen input to land at the global scale. This dataset consists of nitrogen fertilizer, manure, and atmospheric deposition inputs to cropland, pasture, and rangeland at high resolution from 1860 to 2019.
Hanqing Xu, Zhan Tian, Laixiang Sun, Qinghua Ye, Elisa Ragno, Jeremy Bricker, Ganquan Mao, Jinkai Tan, Jun Wang, Qian Ke, Shuai Wang, and Ralf Toumi
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2347–2358, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2347-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2347-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A hydrodynamic model and copula methodology were used to set up a joint distribution of the peak water level and the inland rainfall during tropical cyclone periods, and to calculate the marginal contributions of the individual drivers. The results indicate that the relative sea level rise has significantly amplified the peak water level. The astronomical tide is the leading driver, followed by the contribution from the storm surge.
Camelia-Eliza Telteu, Hannes Müller Schmied, Wim Thiery, Guoyong Leng, Peter Burek, Xingcai Liu, Julien Eric Stanislas Boulange, Lauren Seaby Andersen, Manolis Grillakis, Simon Newland Gosling, Yusuke Satoh, Oldrich Rakovec, Tobias Stacke, Jinfeng Chang, Niko Wanders, Harsh Lovekumar Shah, Tim Trautmann, Ganquan Mao, Naota Hanasaki, Aristeidis Koutroulis, Yadu Pokhrel, Luis Samaniego, Yoshihide Wada, Vimal Mishra, Junguo Liu, Petra Döll, Fang Zhao, Anne Gädeke, Sam S. Rabin, and Florian Herz
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3843–3878, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3843-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3843-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We analyse water storage compartments, water flows, and human water use sectors included in 16 global water models that provide simulations for the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project phase 2b. We develop a standard writing style for the model equations. We conclude that even though hydrologic processes are often based on similar equations, in the end these equations have been adjusted, or the models have used different values for specific parameters or specific variables.
Ganquan Mao, Junguo Liu, Feng Han, Ying Meng, Yong Tian, Yi Zheng, and Chunmiao Zheng
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2018-193, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2018-193, 2018
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Short summary
Apart from traditional water assessment, a new framework is proposed that assesses water resources beyond water balance and take into consideration of all the important factors as possible from perspective of both water supply and consumption.
The interaction between green and blue water plays a key role in the completed water cycling.
Natural ecosystems potentially take a higher risk on freshwater use when the water use competition increases between human and nature.
Fei Lun, Junguo Liu, Philippe Ciais, Thomas Nesme, Jinfeng Chang, Rong Wang, Daniel Goll, Jordi Sardans, Josep Peñuelas, and Michael Obersteiner
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 1–18, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-1-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-1-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
We quantified in detail the P budgets in agricultural systems and PUE on global, regional, and national scales from 2002 to 2010. Globally, half of the total P inputs into agricultural systems accumulated in agricultural soils, with the rest lost to bodies of water. There are great differences in P budgets and PUE in agricultural systems on global, regional, and national scales. International trade played a significant role in P redistribution and P in fertilizer and food among countries.
Yoshihide Wada, Marc F. P. Bierkens, Ad de Roo, Paul A. Dirmeyer, James S. Famiglietti, Naota Hanasaki, Megan Konar, Junguo Liu, Hannes Müller Schmied, Taikan Oki, Yadu Pokhrel, Murugesu Sivapalan, Tara J. Troy, Albert I. J. M. van Dijk, Tim van Emmerik, Marjolein H. J. Van Huijgevoort, Henny A. J. Van Lanen, Charles J. Vörösmarty, Niko Wanders, and Howard Wheater
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 4169–4193, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-4169-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-4169-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Rapidly increasing population and human activities have altered terrestrial water fluxes on an unprecedented scale. Awareness of potential water scarcity led to first global water resource assessments; however, few hydrological models considered the interaction between terrestrial water fluxes and human activities. Our contribution highlights the importance of human activities transforming the Earth's water cycle, and how hydrological models can include such influences in an integrated manner.
G. Tang, X. Zhu, B. Hu, J. Xin, L. Wang, C. Münkel, G. Mao, and Y. Wang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12667–12680, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12667-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12667-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
The manuscript is the first paper to validate and discuss the high-resolution vertical profiles of aerosols using a ceilometer in Beijing, China. We introduce the contribution of aerosols during different air pollution episodes in Beijing. Also, we seize the opportunity of emission reduction during APEC to study the contribution of aerosols. The results are helpful to provide guidance in redefining coordinated emission control strategies to control the regional pollution over northern China.
G. Mao, S. Vogl, P. Laux, S. Wagner, and H. Kunstmann
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1787–1806, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1787-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1787-2015, 2015
J. Shi, J. Liu, and L. Pinter
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1349–1357, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1349-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1349-2014, 2014
Related subject area
Hydrology
An open-source refactoring of the Canadian Small Lakes Model for estimates of evaporation from medium-sized reservoirs
EvalHyd v0.1.2: a polyglot tool for the evaluation of deterministic and probabilistic streamflow predictions
Modelling water quantity and quality for integrated water cycle management with the Water Systems Integrated Modelling framework (WSIMOD) software
HGS-PDAF (version 1.0): a modular data assimilation framework for an integrated surface and subsurface hydrological model
Wflow_sbm v0.7.3, a spatially distributed hydrological model: from global data to local applications
Reservoir Assessment Tool version 3.0: a scalable and user-friendly software platform to mobilize the global water management community
HydroFATE (v1): a high-resolution contaminant fate model for the global river system
Validation of a new global irrigation scheme in the land surface model ORCHIDEE v2.2
GPEP v1.0: the Geospatial Probabilistic Estimation Package to support Earth science applications
GEMS v1.0: Generalizable Empirical Model of Snow Accumulation and Melt, based on daily snow mass changes in response to climate and topographic drivers
Coupling a large-scale glacier and hydrological model (OGGM v1.5.3 and CWatM V1.08) – Towards an improved representation of mountain water resources in global assessments
mesas.py v1.0: a flexible Python package for modeling solute transport and transit times using StorAge Selection functions
rSHUD v2.0: advancing the Simulator for Hydrologic Unstructured Domains and unstructured hydrological modeling in the R environment
Fluvial Flood Inundation and Humanitarian Impact Model Based On Open Data
GLOBGM v1.0: a parallel implementation of a 30 arcsec PCR-GLOBWB-MODFLOW global-scale groundwater model
Development of inter-grid-cell lateral unsaturated and saturated flow model in the E3SM Land Model (v2.0)
pyESDv1.0.1: an open-source Python framework for empirical-statistical downscaling of climate information
Representing the impact of Rhizophora mangroves on flow in a hydrodynamic model (COAWST_rh v1.0): the importance of three-dimensional root system structures
Dynamically weighted ensemble of geoscientific models via automated machine-learning-based classification
Deep Dive into Global Hydrologic Simulations: Harnessing the Power of Deep Learning and Physics-informed Differentiable Models (δHBV-globe1.0-hydroDL)
Enhancing the representation of water management in global hydrological models
NEOPRENE v1.0.1: a Python library for generating spatial rainfall based on the Neyman–Scott process
Uncertainty estimation for a new exponential-filter-based long-term root-zone soil moisture dataset from Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) surface observations
Validating the Nernst–Planck transport model under reaction-driven flow conditions using RetroPy v1.0
DynQual v1.0: a high-resolution global surface water quality model
Data space inversion for efficient uncertainty quantification using an integrated surface and sub-surface hydrologic model
STORM v.2: A simple, stochastic decision-support tool for exploring the impacts of climate and climate change at, and near the land surface in gauged watersheds
RoGeR v3.0.3 – a process-based hydrological toolbox model in Python
Simulation of crop yield using the global hydrological model H08 (crp.v1)
How is a global sensitivity analysis of a catchment-scale, distributed pesticide transfer model performed? Application to the PESHMELBA model
iHydroSlide3D v1.0: an advanced hydrological–geotechnical model for hydrological simulation and three-dimensional landslide prediction
GEB v0.1: a large-scale agent-based socio-hydrological model – simulating 10 million individual farming households in a fully distributed hydrological model
Tracing and visualisation of contributing water sources in the LISFLOOD-FP model of flood inundation (within CAESAR-Lisflood version 1.9j-WS)
Continental-scale evaluation of a fully distributed coupled land surface and groundwater model, ParFlow-CLM (v3.6.0), over Europe
Evaluating a global soil moisture dataset from a multitask model (GSM3 v1.0) with potential applications for crop threats
SERGHEI (SERGHEI-SWE) v1.0: a performance-portable high-performance parallel-computing shallow-water solver for hydrology and environmental hydraulics
A simple, efficient, mass-conservative approach to solving Richards' equation (openRE, v1.0)
Customized deep learning for precipitation bias correction and downscaling
Implementation and sensitivity analysis of the Dam-Reservoir OPeration model (DROP v1.0) over Spain
Regional coupled surface–subsurface hydrological model fitting based on a spatially distributed minimalist reduction of frequency domain discharge data
Operational water forecast ability of the HRRR-iSnobal combination: an evaluation to adapt into production environments
Prediction of algal blooms via data-driven machine learning models: an evaluation using data from a well-monitored mesotrophic lake
UniFHy v0.1.1: a community modelling framework for the terrestrial water cycle in Python
Basin-scale gyres and mesoscale eddies in large lakes: a novel procedure for their detection and characterization, assessed in Lake Geneva
SIMO v1.0: simplified model of the vertical temperature profile in a small, warm, monomictic lake
Thermal modeling of three lakes within the continuous permafrost zone in Alaska using the LAKE 2.0 model
Water balance model (WBM) v.1.0.0: a scalable gridded global hydrologic model with water-tracking functionality
Coupling a large-scale hydrological model (CWatM v1.1) with a high-resolution groundwater flow model (MODFLOW 6) to assess the impact of irrigation at regional scale
RavenR v2.1.4: an open-source R package to support flexible hydrologic modelling
Developing a parsimonious canopy model (PCM v1.0) to predict forest gross primary productivity and leaf area index of deciduous broad-leaved forest
M. Graham Clark and Sean K. Carey
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4911–4922, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4911-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4911-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper provides validation of the Canadian Small Lakes Model (CSLM) for estimating evaporation rates from reservoirs and a refactoring of the original FORTRAN code into MATLAB and Python, which are now stored in GitHub repositories. Here we provide direct observations of the surface energy exchange obtained with an eddy covariance system to validate the CSLM. There was good agreement between observations and estimations except under specific atmospheric conditions when evaporation is low.
Thibault Hallouin, François Bourgin, Charles Perrin, Maria-Helena Ramos, and Vazken Andréassian
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4561–4578, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4561-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4561-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The evaluation of the quality of hydrological model outputs against streamflow observations is widespread in the hydrological literature. In order to improve on the reproducibility of published studies, a new evaluation tool dedicated to hydrological applications is presented. It is open source and usable in a variety of programming languages to make it as accessible as possible to the community. Thus, authors and readers alike can use the same tool to produce and reproduce the results.
Barnaby Dobson, Leyang Liu, and Ana Mijic
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4495–4513, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4495-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4495-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Water management is challenging when models don't capture the entire water cycle. We propose that using integrated models facilitates management and improves understanding. We introduce a software tool designed for this task. We discuss its foundation, how it simulates water system components and their interactions, and its customisation. We provide a flexible way to represent water systems, and we hope it will inspire more research and practical applications for sustainable water management.
Qi Tang, Hugo Delottier, Wolfgang Kurtz, Lars Nerger, Oliver S. Schilling, and Philip Brunner
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3559–3578, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3559-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3559-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We have developed a new data assimilation framework by coupling an integrated hydrological model HydroGeoSphere with the data assimilation software PDAF. Compared to existing hydrological data assimilation systems, the advantage of our newly developed framework lies in its consideration of the physically based model; its large selection of different assimilation algorithms; and its modularity with respect to the combination of different types of observations, states and parameters.
Willem J. van Verseveld, Albrecht H. Weerts, Martijn Visser, Joost Buitink, Ruben O. Imhoff, Hélène Boisgontier, Laurène Bouaziz, Dirk Eilander, Mark Hegnauer, Corine ten Velden, and Bobby Russell
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3199–3234, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3199-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3199-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present the wflow_sbm distributed hydrological model, recently released by Deltares, as part of the Wflow.jl open-source modelling framework in the programming language Julia. Wflow_sbm has a fast runtime, making it suitable for large-scale modelling. Wflow_sbm models can be set a priori for any catchment with the Python tool HydroMT-Wflow based on globally available datasets, which results in satisfactory to good performance (without much tuning). We show this for a number of specific cases.
Sanchit Minocha, Faisal Hossain, Pritam Das, Sarath Suresh, Shahzaib Khan, George Darkwah, Hyongki Lee, Stefano Galelli, Konstantinos Andreadis, and Perry Oddo
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3137–3156, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3137-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3137-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The Reservoir Assessment Tool (RAT) merges satellite data with hydrological models, enabling robust estimation of reservoir parameters like inflow, outflow, surface area, and storage changes around the world. Version 3.0 of RAT lowers the barrier of entry for new users and achieves scalability and computational efficiency. RAT 3.0 also facilitates open-source development of functions for continuous improvement to mobilize and empower the global water management community.
Heloisa Ehalt Macedo, Bernhard Lehner, Jim Nicell, and Günther Grill
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2877–2899, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2877-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2877-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Treated and untreated wastewaters are sources of contaminants of emerging concern. HydroFATE, a new global model, estimates their concentrations in surface waters, identifying streams that are most at risk and guiding monitoring/mitigation efforts to safeguard aquatic ecosystems and human health. Model predictions were validated against field measurements of the antibiotic sulfamethoxazole, with predicted concentrations exceeding ecological thresholds in more than 400 000 km of rivers worldwide.
Pedro Felipe Arboleda-Obando, Agnès Ducharne, Zun Yin, and Philippe Ciais
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2141–2164, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2141-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2141-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We show a new irrigation scheme included in the ORCHIDEE land surface model. The new irrigation scheme restrains irrigation due to water shortage, includes water adduction, and represents environmental limits and facilities to access water, due to representing infrastructure in a simple way. Our results show that the new irrigation scheme helps simulate acceptable land surface conditions and fluxes in irrigated areas, even if there are difficulties due to shortcomings and limited information.
Guoqiang Tang, Andrew W. Wood, Andrew J. Newman, Martyn P. Clark, and Simon Michael Papalexiou
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1153–1173, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1153-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1153-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Ensemble geophysical datasets are crucial for understanding uncertainties and supporting probabilistic estimation/prediction. However, open-access tools for creating these datasets are limited. We have developed the Python-based Geospatial Probabilistic Estimation Package (GPEP). Through several experiments, we demonstrate GPEP's ability to estimate precipitation, temperature, and snow water equivalent. GPEP will be a useful tool to support uncertainty analysis in Earth science applications.
Atabek Umirbekov, Richard Essery, and Daniel Müller
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 911–929, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-911-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-911-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present a parsimonious snow model which simulates snow mass without the need for extensive calibration. The model is based on a machine learning algorithm that has been trained on diverse set of daily observations of snow accumulation or melt, along with corresponding climate and topography data. We validated the model using in situ data from numerous new locations. The model provides a promising solution for accurate snow mass estimation across regions where in situ data are limited.
Sarah Hanus, Lilian Schuster, Peter Burek, Fabien Maussion, Yoshihide Wada, and Daniel Viviroli
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2562, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2562, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents a coupling of the large-scale glacier model OGGM and the hydrological model CWatM. Projected future increase in discharge is less strong, while future decrease in discharge is stronger when glacier runoff is explicitly included in the large-scale hydrological model. The reason is that glacier runoff is projected to decrease in nearly all basins. We conclude that an improved glacier representation can prevent underestimating future discharge changes in large river basins.
Ciaran J. Harman and Esther Xu Fei
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 477–495, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-477-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-477-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Over the last 10 years, scientists have developed StorAge Selection: a new way of modeling how material is transported through complex systems. Here, we present some new, easy-to-use, flexible, and very accurate code for implementing this method. We show that, in cases where we know exactly what the answer should be, our code gets the right answer. We also show that our code is closer than some other codes to the right answer in an important way: it conserves mass.
Lele Shu, Paul Ullrich, Xianhong Meng, Christopher Duffy, Hao Chen, and Zhaoguo Li
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 497–527, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-497-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-497-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Our team developed rSHUD v2.0, a toolkit that simplifies the use of the SHUD, a model simulating water movement in the environment. We demonstrated its effectiveness in two watersheds, one in the USA and one in China. The toolkit also facilitated the creation of the Global Hydrological Data Cloud, a platform for automatic data processing and model deployment, marking a significant advancement in hydrological research.
Lukas Riedel, Thomas Röösli, Thomas Vogt, and David N. Bresch
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-93, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-93, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
River floods are among the most devastating natural disasters. We propose a flood model with statistical approach based on openly available data. The model is integrated in a framework for estimating impacts of physical hazards. Although the model only agrees moderately with satellite detected floods, we show that it can be used for forecasting the magnitude of flood events in terms of humanitarian impacts and for comparing these with past events.
Jarno Verkaik, Edwin H. Sutanudjaja, Gualbert H. P. Oude Essink, Hai Xiang Lin, and Marc F. P. Bierkens
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 275–300, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-275-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-275-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents the parallel PCR-GLOBWB global-scale groundwater model at 30 arcsec resolution (~1 km at the Equator). Named GLOBGM v1.0, this model is a follow-up of the 5 arcmin (~10 km) model, aiming for a higher-resolution simulation of worldwide fresh groundwater reserves under climate change and excessive pumping. For a long transient simulation using a parallel prototype of MODFLOW 6, we show that our implementation is efficient for a relatively low number of processor cores.
Han Qiu, Gautam Bisht, Lingcheng Li, Dalei Hao, and Donghui Xu
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 143–167, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-143-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-143-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We developed and validated an inter-grid-cell lateral groundwater flow model for both saturated and unsaturated zone in the ELMv2.0 framework. The developed model was benchmarked against PFLOTRAN, a 3D subsurface flow and transport model and showed comparable performance with PFLOTRAN. The developed model was also applied to the Little Washita experimental watershed. The spatial pattern of simulated groundwater table depth agreed well with the global groundwater table benchmark dataset.
Daniel Boateng and Sebastian G. Mutz
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6479–6514, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6479-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6479-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We present an open-source Python framework for performing empirical-statistical downscaling of climate information, such as precipitation. The user-friendly package comprises all the downscaling cycles including data preparation, model selection, training, and evaluation, designed in an efficient and flexible manner, allowing for quick and reproducible downscaling products. The framework would contribute to climate change impact assessments by generating accurate high-resolution climate data.
Masaya Yoshikai, Takashi Nakamura, Eugene C. Herrera, Rempei Suwa, Rene Rollon, Raghab Ray, Keita Furukawa, and Kazuo Nadaoka
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5847–5863, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5847-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5847-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Due to complex root system structures, representing the impacts of Rhizophora mangroves on flow in hydrodynamic models has been challenging. This study presents a new drag and turbulence model that leverages an empirical model for root systems. The model can be applied without rigorous measurements of root structures and showed high performance in flow simulations; this may provide a better understanding of hydrodynamics and related transport processes in Rhizophora mangrove forests.
Hao Chen, Tiejun Wang, Yonggen Zhang, Yun Bai, and Xi Chen
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5685–5701, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5685-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5685-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Effectively assembling multiple models for approaching a benchmark solution remains a long-standing issue for various geoscience domains. We here propose an automated machine learning-assisted ensemble framework (AutoML-Ens) that attempts to resolve this challenge. Results demonstrate the great potential of AutoML-Ens for improving estimations due to its two unique features, i.e., assigning dynamic weights for candidate models and taking full advantage of AutoML-assisted workflow.
Dapeng Feng, Hylke Beck, Jens de Bruijn, Reetik Kumar Sahu, Yusuke Satoh, Yoshihide Wada, Jiangtao Liu, Ming Pan, Kathryn Lawson, and Chaopeng Shen
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-190, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-190, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate hydrological modeling is vital to characterizing water cycle responses to climate change. For the first time at this scale, we use differentiable physics-informed machine learning hydrologic models to simulate rainfall-runoff processes for 3753 basins around the world and compare them with purely data-driven and traditional approaches. This sets a benchmark for hydrologic estimates around the world and builds foundations for improving global hydrologic simulations.
Guta Wakbulcho Abeshu, Fuqiang Tian, Thomas Wild, Mengqi Zhao, Sean Turner, A. F. M. Kamal Chowdhury, Chris R. Vernon, Hongchang Hu, Yuan Zhuang, Mohamad Hejazi, and Hong-Yi Li
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5449–5472, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5449-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5449-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Most existing global hydrologic models do not explicitly represent hydropower reservoirs. We are introducing a new water management module to Xanthos that distinguishes between the operational characteristics of irrigation, hydropower, and flood control reservoirs. We show that this explicit representation of hydropower reservoirs can lead to a significantly more realistic simulation of reservoir storage and releases in over 44 % of the hydropower reservoirs included in this study.
Javier Diez-Sierra, Salvador Navas, and Manuel del Jesus
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5035–5048, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5035-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5035-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
NEOPRENE is an open-source, freely available library allowing scientists and practitioners to generate synthetic time series and maps of rainfall. These outputs will help to explore plausible events that were never observed in the past but may occur in the near future and to generate possible future events under climate change conditions. The paper shows how to use the library to downscale daily precipitation and how to use synthetic generation to improve our characterization of extreme events.
Adam Pasik, Alexander Gruber, Wolfgang Preimesberger, Domenico De Santis, and Wouter Dorigo
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4957–4976, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4957-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4957-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We apply the exponential filter (EF) method to satellite soil moisture retrievals to estimate the water content in the unobserved root zone globally from 2002–2020. Quality assessment against an independent dataset shows satisfactory results. Error characterization is carried out using the standard uncertainty propagation law and empirically estimated values of EF model structural uncertainty and parameter uncertainty. This is followed by analysis of temporal uncertainty variations.
Po-Wei Huang, Bernd Flemisch, Chao-Zhong Qin, Martin O. Saar, and Anozie Ebigbo
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4767–4791, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4767-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4767-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Water in natural environments consists of many ions. Ions are electrically charged and exert electric forces on each other. We discuss whether the electric forces are relevant in describing mixing and reaction processes in natural environments. By comparing our computer simulations to lab experiments in literature, we show that the electric interactions between ions can play an essential role in mixing and reaction processes, in which case they should not be neglected in numerical modeling.
Edward R. Jones, Marc F. P. Bierkens, Niko Wanders, Edwin H. Sutanudjaja, Ludovicus P. H. van Beek, and Michelle T. H. van Vliet
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4481–4500, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4481-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4481-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
DynQual is a new high-resolution global water quality model for simulating total dissolved solids, biological oxygen demand and fecal coliform as indicators of salinity, organic pollution and pathogen pollution, respectively. Output data from DynQual can supplement the observational record of water quality data, which is highly fragmented across space and time, and has the potential to inform assessments in a broad range of fields including ecological, human health and water scarcity studies.
Hugo Delottier, John Doherty, and Philip Brunner
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4213–4231, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4213-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4213-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Long run times are usually a barrier to the quantification and reduction of predictive uncertainty with complex hydrological models. Data space inversion (DSI) provides an alternative and highly model-run-efficient method for uncertainty quantification. This paper demonstrates DSI's ability to robustly quantify predictive uncertainty and extend the methodology to provide practical metrics that can guide data acquisition and analysis to achieve goals of decision-support modelling.
Manuel Felipe Rios Gaona, Katerina Michaelides, and Michael Bliss Singer
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-98, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-98, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
STORM v.2 (short for STOchastic Rainfall Model version 2.0) is an open-source, and user-friendly modeling framework for simulating rainfall fields over a basin. It also allows simulating the impact of plausible climate change either on the total seasonal rainfall or the storm’s maximum intensity.
Robin Schwemmle, Hannes Leistert, Steinbrich Andreas, and Markus Weiler
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-118, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-118, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
The new process-based hydrological toolbox model RoGeR (https://roger.readthedocs.io/) can be used to estimate the components of the hydrological cycle and the related travel times of pollutants through parts of the hydrological cycle. These estimations may contribute to an effective water resources management. This paper presents the toolbox concept and provides a simple example on providing estimations to water resources management.
Zhipin Ai and Naota Hanasaki
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3275–3290, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3275-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3275-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Simultaneously simulating food production and the requirements and availability of water resources in a spatially explicit manner within a single framework remains challenging on a global scale. Here, we successfully enhanced the global hydrological model H08 that considers human water use and management to simulate the yields of four major staple crops: maize, wheat, rice, and soybean. Our improved model will be beneficial for advancing global food–water nexus studies in the future.
Emilie Rouzies, Claire Lauvernet, Bruno Sudret, and Arthur Vidard
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3137–3163, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3137-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3137-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Water and pesticide transfer models are complex and should be simplified to be used in decision support. Indeed, these models simulate many spatial processes in interaction, involving a large number of parameters. Sensitivity analysis allows us to select the most influential input parameters, but it has to be adapted to spatial modelling. This study will identify relevant methods that can be transposed to any hydrological and water quality model and improve the fate of pesticide knowledge.
Guoding Chen, Ke Zhang, Sheng Wang, Yi Xia, and Lijun Chao
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2915–2937, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2915-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2915-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we developed a novel modeling system called iHydroSlide3D v1.0 by coupling a modified a 3D landslide model with a distributed hydrology model. The model is able to apply flexibly different simulating resolutions for hydrological and slope stability submodules and gain a high computational efficiency through parallel computation. The test results in the Yuehe River basin, China, show a good predicative capability for cascading flood–landslide events.
Jens A. de Bruijn, Mikhail Smilovic, Peter Burek, Luca Guillaumot, Yoshihide Wada, and Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2437–2454, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2437-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2437-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We present a computer simulation model of the hydrological system and human system, which can simulate the behaviour of individual farmers and their interactions with the water system at basin scale to assess how the systems have evolved and are projected to evolve in the future. For example, we can simulate the effect of subsidies provided on investment in adaptation measures and subsequent effects in the hydrological system, such as a lowering of the groundwater table or reservoir level.
Matthew D. Wilson and Thomas J. Coulthard
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2415–2436, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2415-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2415-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
During flooding, the sources of water that inundate a location can influence impacts such as pollution. However, methods to trace water sources in flood events are currently only available in complex, computationally expensive hydraulic models. We propose a simplified method which can be added to efficient, reduced-complexity model codes, enabling an improved understanding of flood dynamics and its impacts. We demonstrate its application for three sites at a range of spatial and temporal scales.
Bibi S. Naz, Wendy Sharples, Yueling Ma, Klaus Goergen, and Stefan Kollet
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1617–1639, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1617-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1617-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
It is challenging to apply a high-resolution integrated land surface and groundwater model over large spatial scales. In this paper, we demonstrate the application of such a model over a pan-European domain at 3 km resolution and perform an extensive evaluation of simulated water states and fluxes by comparing with in situ and satellite data. This study can serve as a benchmark and baseline for future studies of climate change impact projections and for hydrological forecasting.
Jiangtao Liu, David Hughes, Farshid Rahmani, Kathryn Lawson, and Chaopeng Shen
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1553–1567, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1553-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1553-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Under-monitored regions like Africa need high-quality soil moisture predictions to help with food production, but it is not clear if soil moisture processes are similar enough around the world for data-driven models to maintain accuracy. We present a deep-learning-based soil moisture model that learns from both in situ data and satellite data and performs better than satellite products at the global scale. These results help us apply our model globally while better understanding its limitations.
Daniel Caviedes-Voullième, Mario Morales-Hernández, Matthew R. Norman, and Ilhan Özgen-Xian
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 977–1008, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-977-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-977-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper introduces the SERGHEI framework and a solver for shallow-water problems. Such models, often used for surface flow and flood modelling, are computationally intense. In recent years the trends to increase computational power have changed, requiring models to adapt to new hardware and new software paradigms. SERGHEI addresses these challenges, allowing surface flow simulation to be enabled on the newest and upcoming consumer hardware and supercomputers very efficiently.
Andrew M. Ireson, Raymond J. Spiteri, Martyn P. Clark, and Simon A. Mathias
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 659–677, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-659-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-659-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Richards' equation (RE) is used to describe the movement and storage of water in a soil profile and is a component of many hydrological and earth-system models. Solving RE numerically is challenging due to the non-linearities in the properties. Here, we present a simple but effective and mass-conservative solution to solving RE, which is ideal for teaching/learning purposes but also useful in prototype models that are used to explore alternative process representations.
Fang Wang, Di Tian, and Mark Carroll
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 535–556, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-535-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-535-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Gridded precipitation datasets suffer from biases and coarse resolutions. We developed a customized deep learning (DL) model to bias-correct and downscale gridded precipitation data using radar observations. The results showed that the customized DL model can generate improved precipitation at fine resolutions where regular DL and statistical methods experience challenges. The new model can be used to improve precipitation estimates, especially for capturing extremes at smaller scales.
Malak Sadki, Simon Munier, Aaron Boone, and Sophie Ricci
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 427–448, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-427-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-427-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Predicting water resource evolution is a key challenge for the coming century.
Anthropogenic impacts on water resources, and particularly the effects of dams and reservoirs on river flows, are still poorly known and generally neglected in global hydrological studies. A parameterized reservoir model is reproduced to compute monthly releases in Spanish anthropized river basins. For global application, an exhaustive sensitivity analysis of the model parameters is performed on flows and volumes.
Nicolas Flipo, Nicolas Gallois, and Jonathan Schuite
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 353–381, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-353-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-353-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
A new approach is proposed to fit hydrological or land surface models, which suffer from large uncertainties in terms of water partitioning between fast runoff and slow infiltration from small watersheds to regional or continental river basins. It is based on the analysis of hydrosystem behavior in the frequency domain, which serves as a basis for estimating water flows in the time domain with a physically based model. It opens the way to significant breakthroughs in hydrological modeling.
Joachim Meyer, John Horel, Patrick Kormos, Andrew Hedrick, Ernesto Trujillo, and S. McKenzie Skiles
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 233–250, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-233-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-233-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Freshwater resupply from seasonal snow in the mountains is changing. Current water prediction methods from snow rely on historical data excluding the change and can lead to errors. This work presented and evaluated an alternative snow-physics-based approach. The results in a test watershed were promising, and future improvements were identified. Adaptation to current forecast environments would improve resilience to the seasonal snow changes and helps ensure the accuracy of resupply forecasts.
Shuqi Lin, Donald C. Pierson, and Jorrit P. Mesman
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 35–46, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-35-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-35-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The risks brought by the proliferation of algal blooms motivate the improvement of bloom forecasting tools, but algal blooms are complexly controlled and difficult to predict. Given rapid growth of monitoring data and advances in computation, machine learning offers an alternative prediction methodology. This study tested various machine learning workflows in a dimictic mesotrophic lake and gave promising predictions of the seasonal variations and the timing of algal blooms.
Thibault Hallouin, Richard J. Ellis, Douglas B. Clark, Simon J. Dadson, Andrew G. Hughes, Bryan N. Lawrence, Grenville M. S. Lister, and Jan Polcher
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 9177–9196, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-9177-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-9177-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A new framework for modelling the water cycle in the land system has been implemented. It considers the hydrological cycle as three interconnected components, bringing flexibility in the choice of the physical processes and their spatio-temporal resolutions. It is designed to foster collaborations between land surface, hydrological, and groundwater modelling communities to develop the next-generation of land system models for integration in Earth system models.
Seyed Mahmood Hamze-Ziabari, Ulrich Lemmin, Frédéric Soulignac, Mehrshad Foroughan, and David Andrew Barry
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8785–8807, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8785-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8785-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A procedure combining numerical simulations, remote sensing, and statistical analyses is developed to detect large-scale current systems in large lakes. By applying this novel procedure in Lake Geneva, strategies for detailed transect field studies of the gyres and eddies were developed. Unambiguous field evidence of 3D gyre/eddy structures in full agreement with predictions confirmed the robustness of the proposed procedure.
Kristina Šarović, Melita Burić, and Zvjezdana B. Klaić
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8349–8375, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8349-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8349-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We develop a simple 1-D model for the prediction of the vertical temperature profiles in small, warm lakes. The model uses routinely measured meteorological variables as well as UVB radiation and yearly mean temperature data. It can be used for the assessment of the onset and duration of lake stratification periods when water temperature data are unavailable, which can be useful for various lake studies performed in other scientific fields, such as biology, geochemistry, and sedimentology.
Jason A. Clark, Elchin E. Jafarov, Ken D. Tape, Benjamin M. Jones, and Victor Stepanenko
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7421–7448, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7421-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7421-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Lakes in the Arctic are important reservoirs of heat. Under climate warming scenarios, we expect Arctic lakes to warm the surrounding frozen ground. We simulate water temperatures in three Arctic lakes in northern Alaska over several years. Our results show that snow depth and lake ice strongly affect water temperatures during the frozen season and that more heat storage by lakes would enhance thawing of frozen ground.
Danielle S. Grogan, Shan Zuidema, Alex Prusevich, Wilfred M. Wollheim, Stanley Glidden, and Richard B. Lammers
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7287–7323, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7287-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7287-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes the University of New Hampshire's water balance model (WBM). This model simulates the land surface components of the global water cycle and includes water extractions for use by humans for agricultural, domestic, and industrial purposes. A new feature is described that permits water source tracking through the water cycle, which has implications for water resource management. This paper was written to describe a long-used model and presents its first open-source version.
Luca Guillaumot, Mikhail Smilovic, Peter Burek, Jens de Bruijn, Peter Greve, Taher Kahil, and Yoshihide Wada
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7099–7120, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7099-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7099-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We develop and test the first large-scale hydrological model at regional scale with a very high spatial resolution that includes a water management and groundwater flow model. This study infers the impact of surface and groundwater-based irrigation on groundwater recharge and on evapotranspiration in both irrigated and non-irrigated areas. We argue that water table recorded in boreholes can be used as validation data if water management is well implemented and spatial resolution is ≤ 100 m.
Robert Chlumsky, James R. Craig, Simon G. M. Lin, Sarah Grass, Leland Scantlebury, Genevieve Brown, and Rezgar Arabzadeh
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7017–7030, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7017-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7017-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce the open-source RavenR package, which has been built to support the use of the hydrologic modelling framework Raven. The R package contains many functions that may be useful in each step of the model-building process, including preparing model input files, running the model, and analyzing the outputs. We present six reproducible use cases of the RavenR package for the Liard River basin in Canada to demonstrate how it may be deployed.
Bahar Bahrami, Anke Hildebrandt, Stephan Thober, Corinna Rebmann, Rico Fischer, Luis Samaniego, Oldrich Rakovec, and Rohini Kumar
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6957–6984, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6957-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6957-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Leaf area index (LAI) and gross primary productivity (GPP) are crucial components to carbon cycle, and are closely linked to water cycle in many ways. We develop a Parsimonious Canopy Model (PCM) to simulate GPP and LAI at stand scale, and show its applicability over a diverse range of deciduous broad-leaved forest biomes. With its modular structure, the PCM is able to adapt with existing data requirements, and run in either a stand-alone mode or as an interface linked to hydrologic models.
Cited articles
Adamson, P. T., Rutherfurd, I. D., Peel, M. C., and Conlan, I. A.: The Hydrology of the Mekong River, chap. 4, in: The Mekong, edited by: Campbell,
I. C., Aquatic Ecology, Academic Press, San Diego, 53–76,
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374026-7.00004-8, 2009. a
Albergel, C., Dutra, E., Munier, S., Calvet, J.-C., Munoz-Sabater, J., de Rosnay, P., and Balsamo, G.: ERA-5 and ERA-Interim driven ISBA land surface model simulations: which one performs better?, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3515–3532, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3515-2018, 2018. a
Alfieri, L., Burek, P., Dutra, E., Krzeminski, B., Muraro, D., Thielen, J., and Pappenberger, F.: GloFAS – global ensemble streamflow forecasting and flood early warning, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1161–1175, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1161-2013, 2013. a
Bai, P., Liu, X., Yang, T., Li, F., Liang, K., Hu, S., and Liu, C.: Assessment of the Influences of Different Potential Evapotranspiration Inputs on the Performance of Monthly Hydrological Models under Different Climatic Conditions, J. Hydrometeorol., 17, 2259–2274,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-15-0202.1, 2016. a
Bair, E. H., Rittger, K., Davis, R. E., Painter, T. H., and Dozier, J.:
Validating reconstruction of snow water equivalent in California's Sierra
Nevada using measurements from the NASA Airborne Snow Observatory, Water
Resour. Res., 52, 8437–8460, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR018704,
2016. a
Baldwin, D., Manfreda, S., Keller, K., and Smithwick, E. A.: Predicting root
zone soil moisture with soil properties and satellite near-surface moisture
data across the conterminous United States, J. Hydrol., 546,
393–404, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.01.020, 2017. a
Balsamo, G., Albergel, C., Beljaars, A., Boussetta, S., Brun, E., Cloke, H., Dee, D., Dutra, E., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Pappenberger, F., de Rosnay, P., Stockdale, T., and Vitart, F.: ERA-Interim/Land: a global land surface reanalysis data set, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 389–407, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-389-2015, 2015. a, b, c
Balsamo, G., Albergel, C., Beljaars, A., Boussetta, S., Brun, E., Cloke, H., Dee, D., Dutra, E., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Pappenberger, F., de Rosnay, P., Stockdale, T., and Vitart, F.: ERA-Interim/Land: A global land surface reanalysis data set, available at: http://apps.ecmwf.int/datasets/, last access: 22 September2017.
Berg, A., Sheffield, J., and Milly, P. C. D.: Divergent surface and total soil moisture projections under global warming, Geophysical Research Letters, 44,
236–244, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071921,
2017. a
Bierkens, M. F. P.: Global hydrology 2015: State, trends, and directions,
Water Resour. Res., 51, 4923–4947, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017173, 2015. a
Cai, W. and Cowan, T.: Evidence of impacts from rising temperature on inflows to the Murray-Darling Basin, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L07701, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033390,
2008. a
Chen, D., Gao, G., Xu, C. Y., Guo, J., and Ren, G.: Comparison of the
Thornthwaite method and pan data with the standard Penman-Monteith estimates
of reference evapotranspiration in China, Climate Res., 28, 123–132,
https://doi.org/10.3354/cr028123, 2005. a
Cleverly, J., Eamus, D., Coupe, N. R., Chen, C., Maes, W., Li, L., Faux, R.,
Santini, N. S., Rumman, R., Yu, Q., and Huete, A.: Soil moisture controls on
phenology and productivity in a semi-arid critical zone, Sci.
Total Environ., 568, 1227–1237,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.142,
2016. a
Colliander, A., Jackson, T. J., Bindlish, R., Chan, S., Das, N., Kim, S. B.,
Cosh, M. H., Dunbar, R. S., Dang, L., Pashaian, L., Asanuma, J., Aida, K.,
Berg, A., Rowlandson, T., Bosch, D., Caldwell, T., Caylor, K., Goodrich, D.,
al Jassar, H., Lopez-Baeza, E., Martínez-Fernández, J.,
González-Zamora, A., Livingston, S., McNairn, H., Pacheco, A.,
Moghaddam, M., Montzka, C., Notarnicola, C., Niedrist, G., Pellarin, T.,
Prueger, J., Pulliainen, J., Rautiainen, K., Ramos, J., Seyfried, M., Starks,
P., Su, Z., Zeng, Y., van der Velde, R., Thibeault, M., Dorigo, W.,
Vreugdenhil, M., Walker, J. P., Wu, X., Monerris, A., O'Neill, P. E.,
Entekhabi, D., Njoku, E. G., and Yueh, S.: Validation of SMAP surface soil
moisture products with core validation sites, Remote Sensing of Environment,
191, 215–231, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.01.021, 2017. a
Comola, F., Schaefli, B., Ronco, P. D., Botter, G., Bavay, M., Rinaldo, A., and Lehning, M.: Scale-dependent effects of solar radiation patterns on the
snow-dominated hydrologic response, Geophysical Research Letters, 42,
3895–3902, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064075, 2015. a
Compo, G. P., Whitaker, J. S., Sardeshmukh, P. D., Matsui, N., Allan, R. J.,
Yin, X., Gleason, B. E., Vose, R. S., Rutledge, G., Bessemoulin, P., and
Others: The twentieth century reanalysis project, Q. J.
Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 1–28, 2011. a
de Boer-Euser, T., Meriö, L.-J., and Marttila, H.: Understanding variability in root zone storage capacity in boreal regions, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 125–138, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-125-2019, 2019. a, b
Deardorff, J. W.: Efficient prediction of ground surface temperature and
moisture, with inclusion of a layer of vegetation, J. Geophys.
Res.-Oceans, 83, 1889–1903, https://doi.org/10.1029/JC083iC04p01889, 1978. a, b
de Graaf, I. E. M., Sutanudjaja, E. H., van Beek, L. P. H., and Bierkens, M. F. P.: A high-resolution global-scale groundwater model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 823–837, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-823-2015, 2015. a
Devia, G. K., Ganasri, B. P., and Dwarakish, G. S.: A Review on Hydrological
Models, Aquatic Procedia, 4, 1001–1007, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqpro.2015.02.126,
2015. a
Döll, P., Hoffmann-Dobrev, H., Portmann, F. T., Siebert, S., Eicker, A., Rodell, M., Strassberg, G., and Scanlon, B. R.: Impact of water withdrawals
from groundwater and surface water on continental water storage variations,
J. Geodyn., 59–60, 143–156, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2011.05.001, 2012. a
Döll, P., Müller Schmied, H., Schuh, C., Portmann, F. T., and
Eicker, A.: Global-scale assessment of groundwater depletion and related
groundwater abstractions: Combining hydrological modeling with information
from well observations and GRACE satellites, Water Resour. Res., 50,
5698–5720, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015595,
2014. a
Dorigo, W., Wagner, W., Albergel, C., Albrecht, F., Balsamo, G., Brocca, L.,
Chung, D., Ertl, M., Forkel, M., Gruber, A., Haas, E., Hamer, P. D., Hirschi,
M., Ikonen, J., de Jeu, R., Kidd, R., Lahoz, W., Liu, Y. Y., Miralles, D.,
Mistelbauer, T., Nicolai-Shaw, N., Parinussa, R., Pratola, C., Reimer, C.,
van der Schalie, R., Seneviratne, S. I., Smolander, T., and Lecomte, P.: ESA
CCI Soil Moisture for improved Earth system understanding: State-of-the art
and future directions, Remote Sens. Environ., 203, 185–215,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.07.001,
2017. a
Droogers, P. and Allen, R. G.: Estimating reference evapotranspiration under
inaccurate data conditions, Irrig. Drain. Syst., 16, 33–45,
2002. a
Dumedah, G., Walker, J. P., and Merlin, O.: Root-zone soil moisture estimation
from assimilation of downscaled Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity data,
Adv. Water Resour., 84, 14–22,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.07.021, 2015. a
Entekhabi, D., Njoku, E. G., O'Neill, P. E., Kellogg, K. H., Crow, W. T.,
Edelstein, W. N., Entin, J. K., Goodman, S. D., Jackson, T. J., Johnson, J.,
Kimball, J., Piepmeier, J. R., Koster, R. D., Martin, N., McDonald, K. C.,
Moghaddam, M., Moran, S., Reichle, R., Shi, J. C., Spencer, M. W., Thurman,
S. W., Tsang, L., and Zyl, J. V.: The Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP)
Mission, P. IEEE, 98, 704–716,
https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2010.2043918, 2010. a
Falkenmark, M. and Rockström, J.: The New Blue and Green Water Paradigm:
Breaking New Ground for Water Resources Planning and Management, J. Water Res. Plan. Man., 132, 129–132, 2006. a
Fan, Y., Miguez-Macho, G., Jobbágy, E. G., Jackson, R. B., and
Otero-Casal, C.: Hydrologic regulation of plant rooting depth, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 10572–10577,
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1712381114, 2017. a, b
Faridani, F., Farid, A., Ansari, H., and Manfreda, S.: Estimation of the
Root-Zone Soil Moisture Using Passive Microwave Remote Sensing and SMAR
Model, J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 143, 04016070,
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001115., 2017. a
Feddes, R. A., Hoff, H., Bruen, M., Dawson, T., de Rosnay, P., Dirmeyer, P.,
Jackson, R. B., Kabat, P., Kleidon, A., Lilly, A., and Pitman, A. J.:
Modeling Root Water Uptake in Hydrological and Climate Models, B.
Am. Meteorol. Soc., 82, 2797–2810,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082<2797:MRWUIH>2.3.CO;2,
2001. a
Fekete, B. M., Vorosmarty, C. J., Hall, F. G., Collatz, G. J., Meeson, B. W., Los, S. O., Brown De Colstoun, E., and Landis, D. R.: ISLSCP II UNH/GRDC Composite Monthly Runoff, available at: https://daac.ornl.gov/cgi-bin/dsviewer.pl?ds_id=994, last access: 1 November 2017.
Fenicia, F., Kavetski, D., and Savenije, H. H. G.: Elements of a flexible
approach for conceptual hydrological modeling: 1. Motivation and theoretical
development, Water Resour. Res., 47, W11510, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR010174, 2011. a, b
Friedl, M. A., Sulla-Menashe, D., Tan, B., Schneider, A., Ramankutty, N.,
Sibley, A., and Huang, X.: MODIS Collection 5 global land cover: Algorithm
refinements and characterization of new datasets, Remote Sens.
Environ., 114, 168–182, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.08.016,
2010. a
Friedl, M. A., Sulla-Menashe, D., Tan, B., Schneider, A., Ramankutty, N., Sibley, A., and Huang, X.: MODIS Collection 5 global land cover: Algorithm refinements and characterization of new datasets, available at: https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/products/mcd12q1v006/, last access: 22 September 2017.
Friesen, J., Steele-Dunne, S. C., and van de Giesen, N.: Diurnal differences
in global ERS scatterometer backscatter observations of the land surface,
IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 50, 2595–2602, 2012. a
Funk, C. C., Peterson, P. J., Landsfeld, M. F., Pedreros, D. H., Verdin, J. P., Rowland, J. D., Romero, B. E., Husak, G. J., Michaelsen, J. C., and Verdin, A. P.: A quasi-global precipitation time series for drought monitoring, 832, 4 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ds832, 2014. a
Gao, H., Hrachowitz, M., Fenicia, F., Gharari, S., and Savenije, H. H. G.: Testing the realism of a topography-driven model (FLEX-Topo) in the nested catchments of the Upper Heihe, China, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1895–1915, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1895-2014, 2014a. a, b, c
Gao, H., Birkel, C., Hrachowitz, M., Tetzlaff, D., Soulsby, C., and Savenije, H. H. G.: A simple topography-driven and calibration-free runoff generation module, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 787–809, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-787-2019, 2019. a
Gernaat, D. E., Bogaart, P. W., Vuuren, D. P., Biemans, H., and Niessink, R.:
High-resolution assessment of global technical and economic hydropower
potential, Nature Energy, 2, 821–828, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-017-0006-y, 217. a
González-Zamora, Á., Sánchez, N.,
Martínez-Fernández, J., and Wagner, W.: Root-zone plant
available water estimation using the SMOS-derived soil water index, Adv. Water Resour., 96, 339–353, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.08.001,
2016. a
Gosling, S. N. and Arnell, N. W.: Simulating current global river runoff with a global hydrological model: model revisions, validation, and sensitivity analysis, Hydrol. Proc., 25, 1129–1145, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7727,
2011. a
Gudmundsson, L., Tallaksen, L. M., Stahl, K., Clark, D. B., Dumont, E.,
Hagemann, S., Bertrand, N., Gerten, D., Heinke, J., Hanasaki, N., Voss, F.,
and Koirala, S.: Comparing Large-Scale Hydrological Model Simulations to
Observed Runoff Percentiles in Europe, J. Hydrometeorol., 13,
604–620, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-11-083.1, 2012. a
Guerschman, J. P., Van Dijk, A. I. J. M., Mattersdorf, G., Beringer, J., Hutley, L. B., Leuning, R., Pipunic, R. C., and Sherman, B. S.: Scaling of potential evapotranspiration with MODIS data reproduces flux observations and catchment water balance observations across Australia, J. Hydrol., 369, 107–119, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.02.013,
2009. a
Haddeland, I., Clark, D. B., Franssen, W., Ludwig, F., Voß, F., Arnell,
N. W., Bertrand, N., Best, M., Folwell, S., Gerten, D., Gomes, S., Gosling,
S. N., Hagemann, S., Hanasaki, N., Harding, R., Heinke, J., Kabat, P.,
Koirala, S., Oki, T., Polcher, J., Stacke, T., Viterbo, P., Weedon, G. P.,
and Yeh, P.: Multimodel Estimate of the Global Terrestrial Water Balance:
Setup and First Results, J. Hydrometeorol., 12, 869–884,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JHM1324.1,
2011. a
Hamon, W. R.: Estimating Potential Evapotranspiration, J.
Hydraul. Div., 87, 107–120, 1961. a
Hanasaki, N., Yoshikawa, S., Pokhrel, Y., and Kanae, S.: A global hydrological simulation to specify the sources of water used by humans, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 789–817, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-789-2018, 2018. a, b
Harris, I., Jones, P. D., Osborn, T. J., and Lister, D. H.: Updated
high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations – the CRU TS3.10
Dataset, Int. J. Climatol., 34, 623–642,
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3711, 2014. a
Hunt, E. R. and Yilmaz, M. T.: Remote sensing of vegetation water content
using shortwave infrared reflectances, Proc. SPIE, 6679, 667902,
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.734730, 2007. a
Jackson, T. J., Chen, D., Cosh, M., Li, F., Anderson, M., Walthall, C.,
Doriaswamy, P., and Hunt, E.: Vegetation water content mapping using Landsat
data derived normalized difference water index for corn and soybeans, Remote
Sens. Environ., 92, 475–482,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2003.10.021, 2004. a
Jian Biao, L., Ge, S., Steven, G. M., and Devendra, M. A.: a Comparison of 6
Potential Evapotranpiration Méthods for Regional Use in the Southtern
United States, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 03175,
621–633, 2005. a
Jolly, W. M., Nemani, R., and Running, S. W.: A generalized, bioclimatic index to predict foliar phenology in response to climate, Glob. Change Biolo., 11, 619–632, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00930.x, 2005. a
Kerr, Y. H., Waldteufel, P., Wigneron, J., Delwart, S., Cabot, F., Boutin, J.,
Escorihuela, M., Font, J., Reul, N., Gruhier, C., Juglea, S. E., Drinkwater,
M. R., Hahne, A., Martin-Neira, M., and Mecklenburg, S.: The SMOS Mission:
New Tool for Monitoring Key Elements of the Global Water Cycle, P. IEEE, 98, 666–687, https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2010.2043032, 2010. a
Keyantash, J. and Dracup, J. A.: The Quantification of Drought: An Evaluation of Drought Indices, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 83, 1167–1180, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477-83.8.1167, 2002. a
Kim, H.: Global Soil Wetness Project Phase 3 Atmospheric Boundary Conditions
(Experiment 1) [Data set], Data Integration and Analysis System (DIAS),
https://doi.org/10.20783/DIAS.501, 2017. a
Kim, H., Watanabe, S., Chang, E.-C., Yoshimura, K., Hirabayashi, Y., Famiglietti, J., and Oki, T.: Development of a New Global Dataset for Offline Terrestrial Simulations – for Global Soil Wetness Project Phase 3, available at: http://hydro.iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp/GSWP3/, last access: 22 September 2017.
Kingsford, R. T.: Ecological impacts of dams, water diversions and river
management on floodplain wetlands in Australia, Austral Ecology, 25,
109–127, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-9993.2000.01036.x,
2000. a
Kingston, D. G., Todd, M. C., Taylor, R. G., Thompson, J. R., and Arnell,
N. W.: Uncertainty in the estimation of potential evapotranspiration under
climate change, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, 3–8,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL040267, 2009. a
Kirchner, J. W.: Getting the right answers for the right reasons: Linking
measurements, analyses, and models to advance the science of hydrology,
Water Resour. Res., 42, W03S04, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004362, 2006. a
Krysanova, V. and Hattermann, F. F.: Intercomparison of climate change impacts in 12 large river basins: overview of methods and summary of results, Clim. Change, 141, 363–379, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-1919-y, 2017. a
Kumar, R., Samaniego, L., and Attinger, S.: Implications of distributed
hydrologic model parameterization on water fluxes at multiple scales and
locations, Water Resour. Res., 49, 360–379,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR012195, 2013. a
Lamontagne, S., Taylor, A. R., Cook, P. G., Crosbie, R. S., Brownbill, R.,
Williams, R. M., and Brunner, P.: Field assessment of surface
water-groundwater connectivity in a semi-arid river basin (Murray-Darling,
Australia), Hydrol. Proc., 28, 1561–1572, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9691,
2014. a
Leblanc, M., Tweed, S., Ramillien, G., Tregoning, P., Frappart, F., Fakes, A., and Cartwright, I.: Groundwater change in the Murray basin from long-term in situ monitoring and GRACE estimates, Climate change effects on groundwater
resources: A global synthesis of findings and recommendations CRC Press,
22, 169–187, 2011. a
Legates, D. R., Mahmood, R., Levia, D. F., DeLiberty, T. L., Quiring, S. M.,
Houser, C., and Nelson, F. E.: Soil moisture: A central and unifying theme
in physical geography, Prog. Phys. Geog., 35, 65–86, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133310386514, 2011. a
Leng, G., Huang, M., Tang, Q., and Leung, L. R.: A modeling study of
irrigation effects on global surface water and groundwater resources under a
changing climate, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sys., 7,
1285–1304, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015MS000437,
2015. a
Liang, X., Lettenmaier, D. P., Wood, E. F., and Burges, S. J.: A simple
hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for
general circulation models, J. Geophys. Res., 99,
14415–14428, 1994. a
Liu, J. and Yang, H.: Spatially explicit assessment of global consumptive
water uses in cropland: Green and blue water, J. Hydrol., 384,
187–197, 2010. a
Liu, S., Roberts, D. A., Chadwick, O. A., and Still, C. J.: Spectral responses to plant available soil moisture in a Californian grassland, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs., 19, 31–44, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2012.04.008, 2012. a
Liu, X., Tang, Q., Cui, H., Mu, M., Gerten, D., Gosling, S. N., Masaki, Y.,
Satoh, Y., and Wada, Y.: Multimodel uncertainty changes in simulated river
flows induced by human impact parameterizations, Environ. Res.
Lett., 12, 25009, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa5a3a, 2017. a
Lorenz, C., Kunstmann, H., Devaraju, B., Tourian, M. J., Sneeuw, N., and
Riegger, J.: Large-Scale Runoff from Landmasses: A Global Assessment of the
Closure of the Hydrological and Atmospheric Water Balances, J.
Hydrometeorol., 15, 2111–2139, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-13-0157.1,
2014. a
Lv, M., Lu, H., Yang, K., Xu, Z., Lv, M., and Huang, X.: Assessment of
runoffcomponents simulated by GLDAS against UNH-GRDC dataset at global and
hemispheric scales, Water, 10, 969, https://doi.org/10.3390/w10080969, 2018. a, b
Masaki, Y., Hanasaki, N., Biemans, H., Schmied, H. M., Tang, Q., Wada, Y.,
Gosling, S. N., Takahashi, K., and Hijioka, Y.: Intercomparison of global
river discharge simulations focusing on dam operation – Multiple models
analysis in two case-study river basins, Missouri-Mississippi and
Green-Colorado, Environ. Res. Lett., 12, 055002, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa57a8, 2017. a
Moore, C., Wöhling, T., and Doherty, J.: Efficient regularization and
uncertainty analysis using a global optimization methodology, Water Resour. Res., 46, W08527, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008627, 2010. a
Mu, Q., Zhao, M., and Running, S. W.: Improvements to a MODIS global
terrestrial evapotranspiration algorithm, Remote Sens. Environ.,
115, 1781–1800, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.02.019,
2011. a
Mueller, B., Hirschi, M., Jimenez, C., Ciais, P., Dirmeyer, P. A., Dolman, A. J., Fisher, J. B., Jung, M., Ludwig, F., Maignan, F., Miralles, D. G., McCabe, M. F., Reichstein, M., Sheffield, J., Wang, K., Wood, E. F., Zhang, Y., and Seneviratne, S. I.: Benchmark products for land evapotranspiration: LandFlux-EVAL multi-data set synthesis, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 3707–3720, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3707-2013, 2013. a
Müller Schmied, H., Eisner, S., Franz, D., Wattenbach, M., Portmann, F. T., Flörke, M., and Döll, P.: Sensitivity of simulated global-scale freshwater fluxes and storages to input data, hydrological model structure, human water use and calibration, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 3511–3538, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3511-2014, 2014. a, b, c, d
Müller Schmied, H., Adam, L., Eisner, S., Fink, G., Flörke, M., Kim, H., Oki, T., Portmann, F. T., Reinecke, R., Riedel, C., Song, Q., Zhang, J., and Döll, P.: Impact of climate forcing uncertainty and human water use on global and continental water balance components, Proc. IAHS, 374, 53–62, https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-374-53-2016, 2016. a
Müller Schmied, H., Adam, L., Eisner, S., Fink, G., Flörke, M., Kim, H., Oki, T., Portmann, F. T., Reinecke, R., Riedel, C., Song, Q., Zhang, J., and Döll, P.: Variations of global and continental water balance components as impacted by climate forcing uncertainty and human water use, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 2877–2898, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2877-2016, 2016. a, b
Nijzink, R., Hutton, C., Pechlivanidis, I., Capell, R., Arheimer, B., Freer, J., Han, D., Wagener, T., McGuire, K., Savenije, H., and Hrachowitz, M.: The evolution of root-zone moisture capacities after deforestation: a step towards hydrological predictions under change?, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 4775–4799, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4775-2016, 2016. a, b, c
Nijzink, R. C., Almeida, S., Pechlivanidis, I. G., Capell, R., Gustafssons, D.,
Arheimer, B., Parajka, J., Freer, J., Han, D., Wagener, T., van Nooijen, R.
R. P., Savenije, H. H. G., and Hrachowitz, M.: Constraining Conceptual
Hydrological Models With Multiple Information Sources, Water Resour. Res., 54, 8332–8362, https://doi.org/10.1029/2017WR021895, 2018. a
Njoku, E. G., Jackson, T. J., Lakshmi, V., Chan, T. K., and Nghiem, S. V.:
Soil moisture retrieval from AMSR-E, IEEE T. Geosci.
Remote, 41, 215–229, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2002.808243, 2003. a
Orth, R. and Seneviratne, S. I.: Introduction of a simple-model-based land
surface dataset for Europe, Environ. Res. Lett., 10, 44012,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/4/044012, 2015. a
Pastorello, G., Papale, D., Chu, H., Trotta, C., Agarwal, D., Canfora, E.,
Baldocchi, D., and Torn, M.: The FLUXNET2015 dataset: The longest record of
global carbon, water, and energy fluxes is updated, Eos, 98,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2017EO071597, 2017. a
Paulik, C., Dorigo, W., Wagner, W., and Kidd, R.: Validation of the ASCAT Soil Water Index using in situ data from the International Soil Moisture Network, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs., 30,
1–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2014.01.007, 2014. a
Petropoulos, G. P., Ireland, G., and Barrett, B.: Surface soil moisture
retrievals from remote sensing: Current status, products & future trends,
Phys. Chem. Earth, 83–84, 36–56,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2015.02.009, 2015. a
Potter, N. J. and Chiew, F. H. S.: An investigation into changes in climate
characteristics causing the recent very low runoff in the southern
Murray-Darling Basin using rainfall-runoff models, Water Resour. Res.,
47, W00G10, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR010333,
2011. a
Rakovec, O., Kumar, R., Attinger, S., and Samaniego, L.: Improving the realism of hydrologic model functioning through multivariate parameter estimation, Water Resour. Res., 52, 7779–7792, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019430,
2016. a
Rebel, K. T., de Jeu, R. A. M., Ciais, P., Viovy, N., Piao, S. L., Kiely, G., and Dolman, A. J.: A global analysis of soil moisture derived from satellite observations and a land surface model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 833–847, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-833-2012, 2012. a
Reichle, R. H., Draper, C. S., Liu, Q., Girotto, M., Mahanama, S. P. P.,
Koster, R. D., and De Lannoy, G. J. M.: Assessment of MERRA-2 Land Surface
Hydrology Estimates, J. Climate, 30, 2937–2960,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0720.1, 2017. a
Reid, M., Fluin, J., Ogden, R., Tibby, J., and Kershaw, P.: Long-term
perspectives on human impacts on floodplain–river ecosystems,
Murray–Darling Basin, Australia, SIL Proceedings, 1922–2010, 28, 710–716,
https://doi.org/10.1080/03680770.2001.11901806, 2002. a
Renzullo, L. J., van Dijk, A., Perraud, J.-M., Collins, D., Henderson, B., Jin, H., Smith, A. B., and McJannet, D. L.: Continental satellite soil moisture
data assimilation improves root-zone moisture analysis for water resources
assessment, J. Hydrol., 519, 2747–2762,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.08.008,
2014a. a
Renzullo, L. J., van Dijk, A. I., Perraud, J. M., Collins, D., Henderson, B.,
Jin, H., Smith, A. B., and McJannet, D. L.: Continental satellite soil
moisture data assimilation improves root-zone moisture analysis for water
resources assessment, J. Hydrol., 519, 2747–2762,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.08.008,
2014b. a
Roads, J. and Betts, A.: NCEP–NCAR and ECMWF Reanalysis Surface Water and
Energy Budgets for the Mississippi River Basin, J. Hydrometeorol.,
1, 88–94, https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2000)001<0088:NNAERS>2.0.CO;2, 2000. a
Rockström, J., Gordon, L., Folke, C., Falkenmark, M., and Engwall, M.:
Linkages Among Water Vapor Flows, Food Production, and Terrestrial Ecosystem
Services, Ecol. Soc., 3, 5, 1999. a
Runyan, C. W. and D'Odorico, P.: Ecohydrological feedbacks between salt
accumulation and vegetation dynamics: Role of vegetation-groundwater
interactions, Water Resour. Res., 46, W11561,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009464, 2010. a
Sabater, J. M., Jarlan, L., Calvet, J.-C., Bouyssel, F., and De Rosnay, P.:
From Near-Surface to Root-Zone Soil Moisture Using Different Assimilation
Techniques, J. Hydrometeorol., 8, 194–206,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM571.1, 2007. a
Samaniego, L., Thober, S., Kumar, R., Wanders, N., Rakovec, O., Pan, M., Zink, M., Sheffield, J., Wood, E. F., and Marx, A.: Anthropogenic warming
exacerbates European soil moisture droughts, Nat. Clim. Change, 8,
421–426, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0138-5, 2018. a
Santos, W. J. R., Silva, B. M., Oliveira, G. C., Volpato, M. M. L., Lima,
J. M., Curi, N., and Marques, J. J.: Soil moisture in the root zone and its
relation to plant vigor assessed by remote sensing at management scale,
Geoderma, 221–222, 91–95, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.01.006,
2014. a
Savenije, H. H. G. and Hrachowitz, M.: HESS Opinions “Catchments as meta-organisms – a new blueprint for hydrological modelling”, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1107–1116, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1107-2017, 2017. a, b
Schewe, J., Heinke, J., Gerten, D., Haddeland, I., Arnell, N. W., Clark, D. B., Dankers, R., Eisner, S., Fekete, B. M., Colón-González, F. J., Gosling, S. N., Kim, H., Liu, X., Masaki, Y., Portmann, F. T., Satoh, Y., Stacke, T., Tang, Q., Wada, Y., Wisser, D., Albrecht, T., Frieler, K.,
Piontek, F., Warszawski, L., and Kabat, P.: Multimodel assessment of water
scarcity under climate change, P. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA, 111, 3245–3250, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222460110, 2014. a
Schnur, M. T., Xie, H., and Wang, X.: Estimating root zone soil moisture at
distant sites using MODIS NDVI and EVI in a semi-arid region of southwestern
USA, Ecol. Inform., 5, 400–409,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2010.05.001, 2010. a
Senay, G. B., Bohms, S., Singh, R. K., Gowda, P. H., Velpuri, N. M., Alemu, H., and Verdin, J. P.: Operational Evapotranspiration Mapping Using Remote
Sensing and Weather Datasets: A New Parameterization for the SSEB Approach,
J. Am. Water Resour. As., 49, 577–591,
https://doi.org/10.1111/jawr.12057, 2013. a
Serrano, L., Ustin, S. L., Roberts, D. A., Gamon, J. A., and Peñuelas,
J.: Deriving Water Content of Chaparral Vegetation from AVIRIS Data, Remote
Sens. Environ., 74, 570–581,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00147-4, 2000. a
Sheffield, J. and Wood, E. F.: Global Trends and Variability in Soil Moisture
and Drought Characteristics, 1950–2000, from Observation-Driven Simulations
of the Terrestrial Hydrologic Cycle, J. Climate, 21, 432–458,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI1822.1, 2008. a
Sheikh, V., Visser, S., and Stroosnijder, L.: A simple model to predict soil
moisture: Bridging Event and Continuous Hydrological (BEACH) modelling,
Environ. Model. Softw., 24, 542–556,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.10.005, 2009. a
Smith, A. A., Welch, C., and Stadnyk, T. A.: Assessing the seasonality and
uncertainty in evapotranspiration partitioning using a tracer-aided model,
J. Hydrol., 560, 595–613,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.03.036,
2018. a
Sood, A. and Smakhtin, V.: Global hydrological models: a review, Hydrol. Sci. J., 60, 549–565, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2014.950580, 2015. a, b
Sriwongsitanon, N., Gao, H., Savenije, H. H. G., Maekan, E., Saengsawang, S., and Thianpopirug, S.: Comparing the Normalized Difference Infrared Index (NDII) with root zone storage in a lumped conceptual model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 3361–3377, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3361-2016, 2016. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p, q
Steele-Dunne, S. C., Friesen, J., and van de Giesen, N.: Using diurnal
variation in backscatter to detect vegetation water stress, IEEE
T. Geosci. Remote, 50, 2618–2629, 2012. a
Tangdamrongsub, N., Han, S.-C., Decker, M., Yeo, I.-Y., and Kim, H.: On the use of the GRACE normal equation of inter-satellite tracking data for estimation of soil moisture and groundwater in Australia, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1811–1829, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1811-2018, 2018. a
Tobin, K. J., Torres, R., Crow, W. T., and Bennett, M. E.: Multi-decadal analysis of root-zone soil moisture applying the exponential filter across CONUS, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 4403–4417, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-4403-2017, 2017. a, b, c
Tolson, B. A. and Shoemaker, C. A.: Dynamically dimensioned search algorithm
for computationally efficient watershed model calibration, Water Resour. Res., 43, W01413, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004723, 2007. a, b
Tshimanga, R. M. and Hughes, D. A.: Basin-scale performance of a
semidistributed rainfall-runoff model for hydrological predictions and water
resources assessment of large rivers: The Congo River, Water Resour. Res., 50, 1174–1188, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014310, 2014. a
van Emmerik, T., Steele-Dunne, S. C., Judge, J., and van de Giesen, N.: Impact of Diurnal Variation in Vegetation Water Content on Radar Backscatter From Maize During Water Stress, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 53, 3855–3869, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2014.2386142, 2015. a
Veldkamp, T., Wada, Y., Aerts, J., Döll, P., Gosling, S. N., Liu, J.,
Masaki, Y., Oki, T., Ostberg, S., Pokhrel, Y., Satoh, Y., Kim, H., and Ward,
P. J.: Water scarcity hotspots travel downstream due to human interventions
in the 20th and 21st century, Nat. Commun., 8, 15697,
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15697, 2017. a
Velpuri, N. M., Senay, G. B., Singh, R. K., Bohms, S., and Verdin, J. P.: A
comprehensive evaluation of two MODIS evapotranspiration products over the
conterminous United States: Using point and gridded FLUXNET and water balance
ET, Remote Sens. Environ., 139, 35–49,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.07.013, 2013. a, b
Vergnes, J.-P., Decharme, B., and Habets, F.: Introduction of groundwater
capillary rises using subgrid spatial variability of topography into the ISBA
land surface model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119,
11065–11086, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021573, 2014. a, b, c
Vermote, E.: MOD09A1 MODIS/Terra Surface Reflectance 8-Day L3 Global 500m SIN Grid V006, Data set, NASA EOSDIS LP DAAC, https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD09A1.006,
2015. a, b
Vinukollu, R. K., Meynadier, R., Sheffield, J., and Wood, E. F.: Multi-model, multi-sensor estimates of global evapotranspiration: Climatology, uncertainties and trends, Hydrol. Proc., 25, 3993–4010, 2011. a
Vörösmarty, C. J., Federer, C. A., and Schloss, A. L.: Potential
evaporation functions compared on US watersheds: Possible implications for
global-scale water balance and terrestrial ecosystem modeling, J.
Hydrol., 207, 147–169, 1998. a
Wang, T., Wedin, D. A., Franz, T. E., and Hiller, J.: Effect of vegetation on the temporal stability of soil moisture in grass-stabilized semi-arid sand
dunes, J. Hydrol., 521, 447–459,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.12.037, 2015. a
Wang, W., Cui, W., Wang, X., and Chen, X.: Evaluation of GLDAS-1 and GLDAS-2
Forcing Data and Noah Model Simulations over China at the Monthly Scale,
J. Hydrometeorol., 17, 2815–2833, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-15-0191.1, 2016. a
Wang, X., Xie, H., Guan, H., and Zhou, X.: Different responses of
MODIS-derived NDVI to root-zone soil moisture in semi-arid and humid
regions, J. Hydrol., 340, 12–24,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.03.022,
2007. a
Wang-Erlandsson, L., Bastiaanssen, W. G. M., Gao, H., Jägermeyr, J., Senay, G. B., van Dijk, A. I. J. M., Guerschman, J. P., Keys, P. W., Gordon, L. J., and Savenije, H. H. G.: Global root zone storage capacity from satellite-based evaporation, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1459–1481, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1459-2016, 2016. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m
Warszawski, L., Frieler, K., Huber, V., Piontek, F., Serdeczny, O., and Schewe, J.: The Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISI-MIP): Project framework, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111,
3228–3232, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1312330110, 2014. a, b, c
Wilson, N. R. and Norman, L. M.: Analysis of vegetation recovery surrounding a restored wetland using the normalized difference infrared index (NDII) and
normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), Int. J.
Remote Sens., 39, 3243–3274, https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2018.1437297, 2018. a
Xia, Y., Sheffield, J., Ek, M. B., Dong, J., Chaney, N., Wei, H., Meng, J., and Wood, E. F.: Evaluation of multi-model simulated soil moisture in NLDAS-2, J. Hydrol., 512, 107–125, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.02.027,
2014.
a, b
Yamazaki, D., Kanae, S., Kim, H., and Oki, T.: A physically based description of floodplain inundation dynamics in a global river routing model, Water Resour. Res., 47, 1–21, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009726, 2011. a
Yang, R., Ek, M., and Meng, J.: Surface Water and Energy Budgets for the
Mississippi River Basin in Three NCEP Reanalyses, J. Hydrometeorol., 16, 857–873, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-14-0056.1, 2015. a
Zaherpour, J., Gosling, S. N., Mount, N., Müller Schmied, H., Veldkamp,
T. I. E., Dankers, R., Eisner, S., Gerten, D., Gudmundsson, L., Haddeland,
I., Hanasaki, N., Kim, H., Leng, G., Liu, J., Masaki, Y., Oki, T., Pokhrel,
Y. N., Satoh, Y., Schewe, J., and Wada, Y.: Worldwide evaluation of mean and
extreme runoff from six global-scale hydrological models that account for
human impacts, Environ. Res. Lett., 13, 065015,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac547, 2018. a, b
Zhang, X., Zhang, T., Zhou, P., Shao, Y., and Gao, S.: Validation analysis of SMAP and AMSR2 soil moisture products over the United States using
ground-based measurements, Remote Sens., 9, 104, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9020104, 2017. a
Zhao, R.-J.: The Xinanjiang model applied in China, J. Hydrol.,
135, 371–381, 1992. a
