Articles | Volume 12, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3001-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3001-2019
Development and technical paper
 | 
15 Jul 2019
Development and technical paper |  | 15 Jul 2019

Scientific workflows applied to the coupling of a continuum (Elmer v8.3) and a discrete element (HiDEM v1.0) ice dynamic model

Shahbaz Memon, Dorothée Vallot, Thomas Zwinger, Jan Åström, Helmut Neukirchen, Morris Riedel, and Matthias Book

Related authors

Scale invariance in kilometer-scale sea ice deformation
Matias Uusinoka, Jari Haapala, Jan Åström, Mikko Lensu, and Arttu Polojärvi
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-311,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-311, 2025
Short summary
Sensitivity of the future evolution of the Wilkes Subglacial Basin ice sheet to grounding-line melt parameterizations
Yu Wang, Chen Zhao, Rupert Gladstone, Thomas Zwinger, Benjamin K. Galton-Fenzi, and Poul Christoffersen
The Cryosphere, 18, 5117–5137, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5117-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5117-2024, 2024
Short summary
Increasing numerical stability of mountain valley glacier simulations: implementation and testing of free-surface stabilization in Elmer/Ice
André Löfgren, Thomas Zwinger, Peter Råback, Christian Helanow, and Josefin Ahlkrona
The Cryosphere, 18, 3453–3470, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3453-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3453-2024, 2024
Short summary
A new 3D full-Stokes calving algorithm within Elmer/Ice (v9.0)
Iain Wheel, Douglas I. Benn, Anna J. Crawford, Joe Todd, and Thomas Zwinger
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5759–5777, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5759-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5759-2024, 2024
Short summary
Sensitivity of Totten Glacier dynamics to sliding parameterizations and ice shelf basal melt rates
Yiliang Ma, Liyun Zhao, Rupert Gladstone, Thomas Zwinger, Michael Wolovick, and John C. Moore
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1102,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1102, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Cryosphere
Computationally efficient subglacial drainage modelling using Gaussian process emulators: GlaDS-GP v1.0
Tim Hill, Derek Bingham, Gwenn E. Flowers, and Matthew J. Hoffman
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4045–4074, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4045-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4045-2025, 2025
Short summary
Anisotropic metric-based mesh adaptation for ice flow modelling in Firedrake
Davor Dundovic, Joseph G. Wallwork, Stephan C. Kramer, Fabien Gillet-Chaulet, Regine Hock, and Matthew D. Piggott
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4023–4044, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4023-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4023-2025, 2025
Short summary
Description and validation of the ice-sheet model Nix v1.0
Daniel Moreno-Parada, Alexander Robinson, Marisa Montoya, and Jorge Alvarez-Solas
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3895–3919, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3895-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3895-2025, 2025
Short summary
The Utrecht Finite Volume Ice-Sheet Model (UFEMISM) version 2.0 – Part 1: Description and idealised experiments
Constantijn J. Berends, Victor Azizi, Jorge A. Bernales, and Roderik S. W. van de Wal
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3635–3659, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3635-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3635-2025, 2025
Short summary
A Flexible Snow Model (FSM 2.1.1) including a forest canopy
Richard Essery, Giulia Mazzotti, Sarah Barr, Tobias Jonas, Tristan Quaife, and Nick Rutter
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3583–3605, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3583-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3583-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Åström, J. A., Riikilä, T. I., Tallinen, T., Zwinger, T., Benn, D., Moore, J. C., and Timonen, J.: A particle based simulation model for glacier dynamics, The Cryosphere, 7, 1591–1602, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-1591-2013, 2013. a, b, c
Åström, J. A., Vallot, D., Schäfer, M., Welty, E. Z., O'Neel, S., Bartholomaus, T. C., Liu, Y., Riikilä, T. I., Zwinger, T., Timonen, J., and Moore, J. C.: Termini of calving glaciers as self-organized critical systems, Nat. Geosci., 7, 874–878, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2290, 2014. a
Barker, A. and van Hemert, J.: Scientific Workflow: A Survey and Research Directions, in: Parallel Processing and Applied Mathematics. PPAM 2007, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68111-3_78, 2008. a
Bassis, J. and Jacobs, S.: Diverse calving patterns linked to glacier geometry, Nat. Geosci., 6, 833-–836, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1887, 2013. a
Cuffey, K. M. and Paterson, W. S. B.: The physics of glaciers, Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2010. a
Download
Short summary
Scientific workflows enable complex scientific computational scenarios, which include data intensive scenarios, parametric executions, and interactive simulations. In this article, we applied the UNICORE workflow management system to automate a formerly hard-coded coupling of a glacier flow model and a calving model, which contain many tasks and dependencies, ranging from pre-processing and data management to repetitive executions on heterogeneous high-performance computing (HPC) resources.
Share