Articles | Volume 10, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4477-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4477-2017
Review and perspective paper
 | Highlight paper
 | 
06 Dec 2017
Review and perspective paper | Highlight paper |  | 06 Dec 2017

DCMIP2016: a review of non-hydrostatic dynamical core design and intercomparison of participating models

Paul A. Ullrich, Christiane Jablonowski, James Kent, Peter H. Lauritzen, Ramachandran Nair, Kevin A. Reed, Colin M. Zarzycki, David M. Hall, Don Dazlich, Ross Heikes, Celal Konor, David Randall, Thomas Dubos, Yann Meurdesoif, Xi Chen, Lucas Harris, Christian Kühnlein, Vivian Lee, Abdessamad Qaddouri, Claude Girard, Marco Giorgetta, Daniel Reinert, Joseph Klemp, Sang-Hun Park, William Skamarock, Hiroaki Miura, Tomoki Ohno, Ryuji Yoshida, Robert Walko, Alex Reinecke, and Kevin Viner

Related authors

Multi-Model Comparison of Atmospheric River Flood Simulations in the Russian River Basin
Wen-Ying Wu, Rehenuma Lazin, Shiheng Duan, Mahjabeen Fatema Mitu, Paul Aaron Ullrich, Céline J. W. Bonfils, Hsi-Yen Ma, Giuliana Pallotta, and Christopher Scott Sherman
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3064,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3064, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
Rapid Evaluation Framework for the CMIP7 Assessment Fast Track
Forrest M. Hoffman, Birgit Hassler, Ranjini Swaminathan, Jared Lewis, Bouwe Andela, Nathan Collier, Dóra Hegedűs, Jiwoo Lee, Charlotte Pascoe, Mika Pflüger, Martina Stockhause, Paul Ullrich, Min Xu, Lisa Bock, Felicity Chun, Bettina K. Gier, Douglas I. Kelley, Axel Lauer, Julien Lenhardt, Manuel Schlund, Mohanan G. Sreeush, Katja Weigel, Ed Blockley, Rebecca Beadling, Romain Beucher, Demiso D. Dugassa, Valerio Lembo, Jianhua Lu, Swen Brands, Jerry Tjiputra, Elizaveta Malinina, Brian Medeiros, Enrico Scoccimarro, Jeremy Walton, Phil Kershaw, André Lanfer Marquez, Malcolm J. Roberts, Eleanor O'Rourke, Beth Dingley, Briony Turner, Helene Hewitt, and John P. Dunne
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 7415–7455, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-7415-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-7415-2026, 2026
Short summary
Accurate and robust geometric algorithms for regridding on the sphere
Hongyu Chen, Paul A. Ullrich, Julian Panetta, David Marsico, Moritz Hanke, Rajeev Jain, Chengzhu Zhang, and Robert L. Jacob
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 6545–6570, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-6545-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-6545-2026, 2026
Short summary
New framework for benchmarking decadal predictions leveraging the PCMDI Metric Package with interactive visualization
Jung Choi, Jiwoo Lee, Kristin Chang, Paul A. Ullrich, Peter J. Gleckler, and Sang-Yoon Jun
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 6189–6206, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-6189-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-6189-2026, 2026
Short summary
A PMP-inspired Evaluation Framework for Assessing Deep-Learning Earth System Models
Giuliana Pallotta, Shiheng Duan, Celine Bonfils, Jiwoo Lee, Seth Goodnight, and Paul Ullrich
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.06567,https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.06567, 2026
Short summary

Cited articles

Arakawa, A. and Konor, C. S.: Unification of the anelastic and quasi-hydrostatic systems of equations, Mon. Weather Rev., 137, 710–726, 2009.
Arakawa, A. and Lamb, V. R.: Computational design of the basic dynamical processes of the UCLA general circulation model, Meth. Comput. Phys., 17, 173–265, 1977.
Arakawa, A. and Moorthi, S.: Baroclinic instability in vertically discrete systems, J. Atmos. Sci., 45, 1688–1708, 1988.
Ascher, U. M., Ruuth, S. J., and Spiteri, R. J.: Implicit-explicit Runge-Kutta methods for time-dependent partial differential equations, Appl. Numer. Math., 25, 151–167, 1997.
Baba, Y., Takahashi, K., Sugimura, T., and Goto, K.: Dynamical core of an atmospheric general circulation model on a yin–yang grid, Mon. Weather Rev., 138, 3988–4005, 2010.
Short summary
Atmospheric dynamical cores are a fundamental component of global atmospheric modeling systems and are responsible for capturing the dynamical behavior of the Earth's atmosphere. To better understand modern dynamical cores, this paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of 11 dynamical cores, drawn from modeling centers and groups that participated in the 2016 Dynamical Core Model Intercomparison Project (DCMIP) workshop and summer school.
Share