Articles | Volume 10, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3547-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3547-2017
Model description paper
 | 
26 Sep 2017
Model description paper |  | 26 Sep 2017

Implementation of a physically based water percolation routine in the Crocus/SURFEX (V7.3) snowpack model

Christopher J. L. D'Amboise, Karsten Müller, Laurent Oxarango, Samuel Morin, and Thomas V. Schuler

Related authors

Evaluation of annual maximum snow depth data estimation from the European-wide reanalysis C3S MTMSI (Copernicus Climate Change Service – Mountain Tourism Meteorological and Snow Indicators) against in-situ observations
Elisa Kamir, Samuel Morin, Guillaume Evin, Penelope Gehring, Bodo Wichura, and Ali Nadir Arslan
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-225,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-225, 2025
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Formational Conditions of Ribbed Moraine in Norway: A Distribution Analysis and Ribbed Moraine Inventory
Thomas James Barnes, Thomas Vikhamar Schuler, Karianne Staalesen Lilleøren, and Louise Steffensen Schmidt
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-108,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-108, 2025
Short summary
Recent history and future demise of Jostedalsbreen, the largest ice cap in mainland Europe
Henning Åkesson, Kamilla Hauknes Sjursen, Thomas Vikhamar Schuler, Thorben Dunse, Liss Marie Andreassen, Mette Kusk Gillespie, Benjamin Aubrey Robson, Thomas Schellenberger, and Jacob Clement Yde
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-467,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-467, 2025
Short summary
Improvements in the land surface configuration to better simulate seasonal snow cover in the European Alps with the CNRM-AROME (cycle 46) convection-permitting regional climate model
Diego Monteiro, Cécile Caillaud, Matthieu Lafaysse, Adrien Napoly, Mathieu Fructus, Antoinette Alias, and Samuel Morin
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7645–7677, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7645-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7645-2024, 2024
Short summary
Multi-scale variations of subglacial hydro-mechanical conditions at Kongsvegen glacier, Svalbard
Coline Bouchayer, Ugo Nanni, Pierre-Marie Lefeuvre, John Hult, Louise Steffensen Schmidt, Jack Kohler, François Renard, and Thomas V. Schuler
The Cryosphere, 18, 2939–2968, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2939-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2939-2024, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Cryosphere
The Utrecht Finite Volume Ice-Sheet Model (UFEMISM) version 2.0 – Part 1: Description and idealised experiments
Constantijn J. Berends, Victor Azizi, Jorge A. Bernales, and Roderik S. W. van de Wal
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3635–3659, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3635-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3635-2025, 2025
Short summary
A Flexible Snow Model (FSM 2.1.1) including a forest canopy
Richard Essery, Giulia Mazzotti, Sarah Barr, Tobias Jonas, Tristan Quaife, and Nick Rutter
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3583–3605, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3583-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3583-2025, 2025
Short summary
CMIP6 models overestimate sea ice melt, growth and conduction relative to ice mass balance buoy estimates
Alex E. West and Edward W. Blockley
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3041–3064, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3041-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3041-2025, 2025
Short summary
Coupling framework (1.0) for the Úa (2023b) ice sheet model and the FESOM-1.4 z-coordinate ocean model in an Antarctic domain
Ole Richter, Ralph Timmermann, G. Hilmar Gudmundsson, and Jan De Rydt
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2945–2960, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2945-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2945-2025, 2025
Short summary
A gradient-boosted tree framework to model the ice thickness of the world's glaciers (IceBoost v1.1)
Niccolò Maffezzoli, Eric Rignot, Carlo Barbante, Troels Petersen, and Sebastiano Vascon
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2545–2568, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2545-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2545-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Adachia, S., Yamaguchia, S., Ozekib, T., and Kosec, K.: Hysteresis in the water retention curve of snow measured using an MRI system, available at: http://arc.lib.montana.edu/snow-science/objects/issw-2012-918-922.pdf (last access: 6 July 2016), 2012.
Ambach, W. and Howorka, F.: Avalanche Activity and Free Water Content of Snow at Obergurgl (1980 m a.s.l., Spring 1962), Assoc. Int. Hydrol. Sci., 65–72, 1966.
Avanzi, F., Hirashima, H., Yamaguchi, S., Katsushima, T., and De Michele, C.: Observations of capillary barriers and preferential flow in layered snow during cold laboratory experiments, The Cryosphere, 10, 2013–2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-2013-2016, 2016.
Bengtsson, L.: Percolation of meltwater through a snowpack, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 6, 73–81, doi10.1016/0165-232X(82)90046-5, 1982.
Birkeland, K. W., Hansen, K. J., and Brown, R. L.: The Spatial Variability of Snow Resistance on Potential Avalanche Slopes, J. Glaciol., 41, 183–190, 1995.
Download
Short summary
We present a new water percolation routine added to the Crocus model. The new routine is physically based, describing motion of water through a layered snowpack considering capillary-driven and gravity flow. We tested the routine on two data sets. Wet-snow layers were able to reach higher saturations than the empirical routine. Meaningful applicability is limited until new and better parameterizations of water retention are developed, and feedbacks are adjusted to handle higher saturations.
Share