Articles | Volume 7, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1183-2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1183-2014
Development and technical paper
 | 
23 Jun 2014
Development and technical paper |  | 23 Jun 2014

A technique for generating consistent ice sheet initial conditions for coupled ice sheet/climate models

J. G. Fyke, W. J. Sacks, and W. H. Lipscomb

Related authors

Influence of sea-ice anomalies on Antarctic precipitation using source attribution in the Community Earth System Model
Hailong Wang, Jeremy G. Fyke, Jan T. M. Lenaerts, Jesse M. Nusbaumer, Hansi Singh, David Noone, Philip J. Rasch, and Rudong Zhang
The Cryosphere, 14, 429–444, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-429-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-429-2020, 2020
Short summary
LIVVkit 2.1: automated and extensible ice sheet model validation
Katherine J. Evans, Joseph H. Kennedy, Dan Lu, Mary M. Forrester, Stephen Price, Jeremy Fyke, Andrew R. Bennett, Matthew J. Hoffman, Irina Tezaur, Charles S. Zender, and Miren Vizcaíno
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1067–1086, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1067-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1067-2019, 2019
Short summary
Basin-scale heterogeneity in Antarctic precipitation and its impact on surface mass variability
Jeremy Fyke, Jan T. M. Lenaerts, and Hailong Wang
The Cryosphere, 11, 2595–2609, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2595-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2595-2017, 2017
Short summary

Related subject area

Cryosphere
Computationally efficient subglacial drainage modelling using Gaussian process emulators: GlaDS-GP v1.0
Tim Hill, Derek Bingham, Gwenn E. Flowers, and Matthew J. Hoffman
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4045–4074, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4045-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4045-2025, 2025
Short summary
Anisotropic metric-based mesh adaptation for ice flow modelling in Firedrake
Davor Dundovic, Joseph G. Wallwork, Stephan C. Kramer, Fabien Gillet-Chaulet, Regine Hock, and Matthew D. Piggott
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4023–4044, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4023-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4023-2025, 2025
Short summary
Description and validation of the ice-sheet model Nix v1.0
Daniel Moreno-Parada, Alexander Robinson, Marisa Montoya, and Jorge Alvarez-Solas
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3895–3919, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3895-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3895-2025, 2025
Short summary
The Utrecht Finite Volume Ice-Sheet Model (UFEMISM) version 2.0 – Part 1: Description and idealised experiments
Constantijn J. Berends, Victor Azizi, Jorge A. Bernales, and Roderik S. W. van de Wal
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3635–3659, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3635-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3635-2025, 2025
Short summary
A Flexible Snow Model (FSM 2.1.1) including a forest canopy
Richard Essery, Giulia Mazzotti, Sarah Barr, Tobias Jonas, Tristan Quaife, and Nick Rutter
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3583–3605, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3583-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3583-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Applegate, P. J., Kirchner, N., Stone, E. J., Keller, K., and Greve, R.: An assessment of key model parametric uncertainties in projections of Greenland Ice Sheet behavior, The Cryosphere, 6, 589–606, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-589-2012, 2012.
Arthern, R. and Gudmundsson, G.: Initialization of ice-sheet forecasts viewed as an inverse Robin problem, J. Glaciol., 56, 527–533, 2010.
Bamber, J. L., Layberry, R. L., and Gogineni, S.: A new ice thickness and bed data set for the Greenland ice sheet 1: Measurement, data reduction, and errors, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 33773–33780, 2001.
Bates, S. C., Fox-Kemper, B., Jayne, S. R., Large, W. G., Stevenson, S., and Yeager, S. G.: Mean biases, variability, and trends in air–sea fluxes and sea surface temperature in the CCSM4, J. Climate, 25, 7781–7801, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00442.1, 2012.
Brady, E., Otto-Bliesner, B., Kay, J., and Rosenbloom, N.: Sensitivity to glacial forcing in the CCSM4, J. Climate, 26, 1901–1925, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00416.1, 2013.
Download
Share