Articles | Volume 13, issue 9
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4595–4637, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4595-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue: Evaluation of Model Intercomparison Projects
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4595–4637, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4595-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Model evaluation paper 29 Sep 2020
Model evaluation paper | 29 Sep 2020
Impact of horizontal resolution on global ocean–sea ice model simulations based on the experimental protocols of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (OMIP-2)
Eric P. Chassignet et al.
Related authors
Hiroyuki Tsujino, L. Shogo Urakawa, Stephen M. Griffies, Gokhan Danabasoglu, Alistair J. Adcroft, Arthur E. Amaral, Thomas Arsouze, Mats Bentsen, Raffaele Bernardello, Claus W. Böning, Alexandra Bozec, Eric P. Chassignet, Sergey Danilov, Raphael Dussin, Eleftheria Exarchou, Pier Giuseppe Fogli, Baylor Fox-Kemper, Chuncheng Guo, Mehmet Ilicak, Doroteaciro Iovino, Who M. Kim, Nikolay Koldunov, Vladimir Lapin, Yiwen Li, Pengfei Lin, Keith Lindsay, Hailong Liu, Matthew C. Long, Yoshiki Komuro, Simon J. Marsland, Simona Masina, Aleksi Nummelin, Jan Klaus Rieck, Yohan Ruprich-Robert, Markus Scheinert, Valentina Sicardi, Dmitry Sidorenko, Tatsuo Suzuki, Hiroaki Tatebe, Qiang Wang, Stephen G. Yeager, and Zipeng Yu
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3643–3708, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3643-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3643-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The OMIP-2 framework for global ocean–sea-ice model simulations is assessed by comparing multi-model means from 11 CMIP6-class global ocean–sea-ice models calculated separately for the OMIP-1 and OMIP-2 simulations. Many features are very similar between OMIP-1 and OMIP-2 simulations, and yet key improvements in transitioning from OMIP-1 to OMIP-2 are also identified. Thus, the present assessment justifies that future ocean–sea-ice model development and analysis studies use the OMIP-2 framework.
Taylor A. Shropshire, Steven L. Morey, Eric P. Chassignet, Alexandra Bozec, Victoria J. Coles, Michael R. Landry, Rasmus Swalethorp, Glenn Zapfe, and Michael R. Stukel
Biogeosciences, 17, 3385–3407, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-3385-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-3385-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Zooplankton are the smallest animals in the ocean and important food for fish. Despite their importance, zooplankton have been relatively undersampled. To better understand the zooplankton community in the Gulf of Mexico (GoM), we developed a model to simulate their dynamics. We found that heterotrophic protists are important for supporting mesozooplankton, which are the primary prey of larval fish. The model developed in this study has the potential to improve fisheries management in the GoM.
Tingfeng Dou, Cunde Xiao, Jiping Liu, Qiang Wang, Shifeng Pan, Jie Su, Xiaojun Yuan, Minghu Ding, Feng Zhang, Kai Xue, Peter A. Bieniek, and Hajo Eicken
The Cryosphere, 15, 883–895, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-883-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-883-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Rain-on-snow (ROS) events can accelerate the surface ablation of sea ice, greatly influencing the ice–albedo feedback. We found that spring ROS events have shifted to earlier dates over the Arctic Ocean in recent decades, which is correlated with sea ice melt onset in the Pacific sector and most Eurasian marginal seas. There has been a clear transition from solid to liquid precipitation, leading to a reduction in spring snow depth on sea ice by more than −0.5 cm per decade since the 1980s.
Pengfei Wang, Jinrong Jiang, Pengfei Lin, Mengrong Ding, Junlin Wei, Feng Zhang, Lian Zhao, Yiwen Li, Zipeng Yu, Weipeng Zheng, Yongqiang Yu, Xuebin Chi, and Hailong Liu
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-323, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-323, 2020
Preprint under review for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
The global ocean general circulation models are a fundamental tool for oceanography research, ocean forecast, and climate change research. The increasing resolution will greatly improve the simulation of the model, but it also demands much more computing resources. In this study, we have ported an ocean general circulation model to a heterogeneous computing system and have developed a 3–5 km model version. A 14-year integration has been conducted and the preliminary results have been evaluated.
Pablo Ortega, Jon I. Robson, Matthew Menary, Rowan T. Sutton, Adam Blaker, Agathe Germe, Jöel J.-M. Hirschi, Bablu Sinha, Leon Hermanson, and Stephen Yeager
Earth Syst. Dynam. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2020-83, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2020-83, 2020
Revised manuscript under review for ESD
Short summary
Short summary
Deep Labrador Sea densities are receiving increasing attention because of their link with many of the processes that govern decadal climate oscillations in the North Atlantic, and their potential use as a precursor of those changes. This article explores those links and how they are represented in global climate models, documenting the main differences across models. Models are finally compared with observational products to identify the ones that reproduce the links more realistically.
Claudia Wekerle, Tore Hattermann, Qiang Wang, Laura Crews, Wilken-Jon von Appen, and Sergey Danilov
Ocean Sci., 16, 1225–1246, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-16-1225-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-16-1225-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The high-resolution ocean models ROMS and FESOM configured for the Fram Strait reveal very energetic ocean conditions there. The two main currents meander strongly and shed circular currents of water, called eddies. Our analysis shows that this region is characterised by small and short-lived eddies (on average around a 5 km radius and 10 d lifetime). Both models agree on eddy properties and show similar patterns of baroclinic and barotropic instability of the West Spitsbergen Current.
Shaoqing Zhang, Haohuan Fu, Lixin Wu, Yuxuan Li, Hong Wang, Yunhui Zeng, Xiaohui Duan, Wubing Wan, Li Wang, Yuan Zhuang, Hongsong Meng, Kai Xu, Ping Xu, Lin Gan, Zhao Liu, Sihai Wu, Yuhu Chen, Haining Yu, Shupeng Shi, Lanning Wang, Shiming Xu, Wei Xue, Weiguo Liu, Qiang Guo, Jie Zhang, Guanghui Zhu, Yang Tu, Jim Edwards, Allison Baker, Jianlin Yong, Man Yuan, Yangyang Yu, Qiuying Zhang, Zedong Liu, Mingkui Li, Dongning Jia, Guangwen Yang, Zhiqiang Wei, Jingshan Pan, Ping Chang, Gokhan Danabasoglu, Stephen Yeager, Nan Rosenbloom, and Ying Guo
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4809–4829, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4809-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4809-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Science advancement and societal needs require Earth system modelling with higher resolutions that demand tremendous computing power. We successfully scale the 10 km ocean and 25 km atmosphere high-resolution Earth system model to a new leading-edge heterogeneous supercomputer using state-of-the-art optimizing methods, promising the solution of high spatial resolution and time-varying frequency. Corresponding technical breakthroughs are of significance in modelling and HPC design communities.
Hiroyuki Tsujino, L. Shogo Urakawa, Stephen M. Griffies, Gokhan Danabasoglu, Alistair J. Adcroft, Arthur E. Amaral, Thomas Arsouze, Mats Bentsen, Raffaele Bernardello, Claus W. Böning, Alexandra Bozec, Eric P. Chassignet, Sergey Danilov, Raphael Dussin, Eleftheria Exarchou, Pier Giuseppe Fogli, Baylor Fox-Kemper, Chuncheng Guo, Mehmet Ilicak, Doroteaciro Iovino, Who M. Kim, Nikolay Koldunov, Vladimir Lapin, Yiwen Li, Pengfei Lin, Keith Lindsay, Hailong Liu, Matthew C. Long, Yoshiki Komuro, Simon J. Marsland, Simona Masina, Aleksi Nummelin, Jan Klaus Rieck, Yohan Ruprich-Robert, Markus Scheinert, Valentina Sicardi, Dmitry Sidorenko, Tatsuo Suzuki, Hiroaki Tatebe, Qiang Wang, Stephen G. Yeager, and Zipeng Yu
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3643–3708, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3643-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3643-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The OMIP-2 framework for global ocean–sea-ice model simulations is assessed by comparing multi-model means from 11 CMIP6-class global ocean–sea-ice models calculated separately for the OMIP-1 and OMIP-2 simulations. Many features are very similar between OMIP-1 and OMIP-2 simulations, and yet key improvements in transitioning from OMIP-1 to OMIP-2 are also identified. Thus, the present assessment justifies that future ocean–sea-ice model development and analysis studies use the OMIP-2 framework.
Veronika Eyring, Lisa Bock, Axel Lauer, Mattia Righi, Manuel Schlund, Bouwe Andela, Enrico Arnone, Omar Bellprat, Björn Brötz, Louis-Philippe Caron, Nuno Carvalhais, Irene Cionni, Nicola Cortesi, Bas Crezee, Edouard L. Davin, Paolo Davini, Kevin Debeire, Lee de Mora, Clara Deser, David Docquier, Paul Earnshaw, Carsten Ehbrecht, Bettina K. Gier, Nube Gonzalez-Reviriego, Paul Goodman, Stefan Hagemann, Steven Hardiman, Birgit Hassler, Alasdair Hunter, Christopher Kadow, Stephan Kindermann, Sujan Koirala, Nikolay Koldunov, Quentin Lejeune, Valerio Lembo, Tomas Lovato, Valerio Lucarini, François Massonnet, Benjamin Müller, Amarjiit Pandde, Núria Pérez-Zanón, Adam Phillips, Valeriu Predoi, Joellen Russell, Alistair Sellar, Federico Serva, Tobias Stacke, Ranjini Swaminathan, Verónica Torralba, Javier Vegas-Regidor, Jost von Hardenberg, Katja Weigel, and Klaus Zimmermann
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3383–3438, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3383-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3383-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The Earth System Model Evaluation Tool (ESMValTool) is a community diagnostics and performance metrics tool designed to improve comprehensive and routine evaluation of earth system models (ESMs) participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP). It has undergone rapid development since the first release in 2016 and is now a well-tested tool that provides end-to-end provenance tracking to ensure reproducibility.
Hailun He, Yuan Wang, Xiqiu Han, Yanzhou Wei, Pengfei Lin, Zhongyan Qiu, and Yejian Wang
Ocean Sci., 16, 895–906, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-16-895-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-16-895-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Ocean profiling observation in the Indian Ocean is not sufficient. We conducted a hydrographic survey on the Carlsberg Ridge, which is a mid-ocean ridge in the northwest Indian Ocean, to obtain snapshots of sectional temperature, salinity, and density fields by combining the ARGO data. The results show mesoscale eddies located along the specific ridge and the existence of a west-propagating planetary wave. The results provide references in the regional ocean circulation.
Dmitry Sidorenko, Sergey Danilov, Nikolay Koldunov, Patrick Scholz, and Qiang Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3337–3345, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3337-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3337-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Computation of barotropic and meridional overturning streamfunctions for models formulated on unstructured meshes is commonly preceded by interpolation to a regular mesh. This operation destroys the original conservation, which can be then be artificially imposed to make the computation possible. An elementary method is proposed that avoids interpolation and preserves conservation in a strict model sense.
Taylor A. Shropshire, Steven L. Morey, Eric P. Chassignet, Alexandra Bozec, Victoria J. Coles, Michael R. Landry, Rasmus Swalethorp, Glenn Zapfe, and Michael R. Stukel
Biogeosciences, 17, 3385–3407, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-3385-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-3385-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Zooplankton are the smallest animals in the ocean and important food for fish. Despite their importance, zooplankton have been relatively undersampled. To better understand the zooplankton community in the Gulf of Mexico (GoM), we developed a model to simulate their dynamics. We found that heterotrophic protists are important for supporting mesozooplankton, which are the primary prey of larval fish. The model developed in this study has the potential to improve fisheries management in the GoM.
Ivan M. Parras-Berrocal, Ruben Vazquez, William Cabos, Dmitry Sein, Rafael Mañanes, Juan Perez-Sanz, and Alfredo Izquierdo
Ocean Sci., 16, 743–765, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-16-743-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-16-743-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This work presents high-resolution simulations of a coupled regional model in the Mediterranean basin. The approach allows us to assess the role of ocean feedbacks in the downscaled climate. Our results show good skills in simulating present climate; the model's robustness introduces improvements in reproducing physical processes at local scales. Our climate projections reveal that by the end of the 21st century the Mediterranean Sea will be warmer and saltier although not in a homogeneous way.
Reinhard Schiemann, Panos Athanasiadis, David Barriopedro, Francisco Doblas-Reyes, Katja Lohmann, Malcolm J. Roberts, Dmitry V. Sein, Christopher D. Roberts, Laurent Terray, and Pier Luigi Vidale
Weather Clim. Dynam., 1, 277–292, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-1-277-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-1-277-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In blocking situations the westerly atmospheric flow in the midlatitudes is blocked by near-stationary high-pressure systems. Blocking can be associated with extremes such as cold spells and heat waves. Climate models are known to underestimate blocking occurrence. Here, we assess the latest generation of models and find improvements in simulated blocking, partly due to increases in model resolution. These new models are therefore more suitable for studying climate extremes related to blocking.
Torben Koenigk, Ramon Fuentes-Franco, Virna Meccia, Oliver Gutjahr, Laura C. Jackson, Adrian L. New, Pablo Ortega, Christopher Roberts, Malcolm Roberts, Thomas Arsouze, Doroteaciro Iovino, Marie-Pierre Moine, and Dmitry V. Sein
Ocean Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/os-2020-41, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-2020-41, 2020
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
The mixing of water masses into the deep ocean in the North Atlantic is important for the entire global ocean circulation. We use seven global climate models to investigate the effect of increasing the model resolution on this deep ocean mixing. The main result is that increased model resolution leads to a deeper mixing of water masses in the Labrador Sea but has less effect in the Greenland Sea. However, most of the models overestimate the deep ocean mixing compared to observations.
Valentin Resseguier, Wei Pan, and Baylor Fox-Kemper
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 27, 209–234, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-27-209-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-27-209-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Geophysical flows span a broader range of temporal and spatial scales than can be resolved numerically. One way to alleviate the ensuing numerical errors is to combine simulations with measurements, taking account of the accuracies of these two sources of information. Here we quantify the distribution of numerical simulation errors without relying on high-resolution numerical simulations. Specifically, small-scale random vortices are added to simulations while conserving energy or circulation.
Mattia Righi, Bouwe Andela, Veronika Eyring, Axel Lauer, Valeriu Predoi, Manuel Schlund, Javier Vegas-Regidor, Lisa Bock, Björn Brötz, Lee de Mora, Faruk Diblen, Laura Dreyer, Niels Drost, Paul Earnshaw, Birgit Hassler, Nikolay Koldunov, Bill Little, Saskia Loosveldt Tomas, and Klaus Zimmermann
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1179–1199, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1179-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1179-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes the second major release of ESMValTool, a community diagnostic and performance metrics tool for the evaluation of Earth system models. This new version features a brand new design, with an improved interface and a revised preprocessor. It takes advantage of state-of-the-art computational libraries and methods to deploy efficient and user-friendly data processing, improving the performance over its predecessor by more than a factor of 30.
James Keeble, Birgit Hassler, Antara Banerjee, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Gabriel Chiodo, Sean Davis, Veronika Eyring, Paul T. Griffiths, Olaf Morgenstern, Peer Nowack, Guang Zeng, Jiankai Zhang, Greg Bodeker, David Cugnet, Gokhan Danabasoglu, Makoto Deushi, Larry W. Horowitz, Lijuan Li, Martine Michou, Michael J. Mills, Pierre Nabat, Sungsu Park, and Tongwen Wu
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2019-1202, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2019-1202, 2020
Revised manuscript accepted for ACP
Short summary
Short summary
Stratospheric ozone and water vapour are key components of the Earth system, and changes to both have important impacts on global and regional climate. We evaluate changes to these species from 1850-2100 in the new generation of CMIP6 models. There is good agreement between the multi-model mean and observations, although there is substantial variation between the individual models. The future evolution of both ozone and water vapour is strongly dependent on the assumed future emissions scenario.
Anson Cheung, Baylor Fox-Kemper, and Timothy Herbert
Clim. Past, 15, 1985–1998, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-15-1985-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-15-1985-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
We test two assumptions that are often made in paleoclimate studies by using observations and ask whether temperature and productivity proxy records in the Southern California Current can be used to reconstruct Ekman upwelling. By examining the covariation between alongshore wind stress, temperature, and productivity, we found that the dominant covarying pattern does not reflect Ekman upwelling. Other upwelling patterns found are timescale dependent. Multiple proxies can improve reconstruction.
Patrick Scholz, Dmitry Sidorenko, Ozgur Gurses, Sergey Danilov, Nikolay Koldunov, Qiang Wang, Dmitry Sein, Margarita Smolentseva, Natalja Rakowsky, and Thomas Jung
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4875–4899, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4875-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4875-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This paper is the first in a series documenting and assessing important key components of the Finite-volumE Sea ice-Ocean Model version 2.0 (FESOM2.0). We assess the hydrographic biases, large-scale circulation, numerical performance and scalability of FESOM2.0 compared with its predecessor, FESOM1.4. The main conclusion is that the results of FESOM2.0 compare well to FESOM1.4 in terms of model biases but with a remarkable performance speedup with a 3 times higher throughput.
Christopher Horvat, Lettie A. Roach, Rachel Tilling, Cecilia M. Bitz, Baylor Fox-Kemper, Colin Guider, Kaitlin Hill, Andy Ridout, and Andrew Shepherd
The Cryosphere, 13, 2869–2885, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2869-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2869-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Changes in the floe size distribution (FSD) are important for sea ice evolution but to date largely unobserved and unknown. Climate models, forecast centres, ship captains, and logistic specialists cannot currently obtain statistical information about sea ice floe size on demand. We develop a new method to observe the FSD at global scales and high temporal and spatial resolution. With refinement, this method can provide crucial information for polar ship routing and real-time forecasting.
Nikolay V. Koldunov, Vadym Aizinger, Natalja Rakowsky, Patrick Scholz, Dmitry Sidorenko, Sergey Danilov, and Thomas Jung
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3991–4012, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3991-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3991-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
We measure how computational performance of the global FESOM2 ocean model (formulated on an unstructured mesh) changes with the increase in the number of computational cores. We find that for many components of the model the performance increases linearly but we also identify two bottlenecks: sea ice and ssh submodules. We show that FESOM2 is on par with the state-of-the-art ocean models in terms of throughput that reach 16 simulated years per day for eddy resolving configuration (1/10°).
Özgür Gürses, Vanessa Kolatschek, Qiang Wang, and Christian Bernd Rodehacke
The Cryosphere, 13, 2317–2324, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2317-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2317-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
The warming of the Earth's climate system causes sea level rise. In Antarctica, ice streams flow into the sea and develop ice shelves. These are floating extensions of the ice streams. Ocean water melts these ice shelves. It has been proposed that a submarine wall could shield these ice shelves from the warm water. Our model simulation shows that the wall protects ice shelves. However, the warm water flows to neighboring ice shelves. There, enhanced melting reduces the effectiveness of the wall.
Thomas Rackow, Dmitry V. Sein, Tido Semmler, Sergey Danilov, Nikolay V. Koldunov, Dmitry Sidorenko, Qiang Wang, and Thomas Jung
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2635–2656, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2635-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2635-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Current climate models show errors in the deep ocean that are larger than the level of natural variability and the response to enhanced greenhouse gas concentrations. These errors are larger than the signals we aim to predict. With the AWI Climate Model, we show that increasing resolution to resolve eddies can lead to major reductions in deep ocean errors. AWI's next-generation (CMIP6) model configuration will thus use locally eddy-resolving computational grids for projecting climate change.
Xiaolong Zhao, Chun Zhou, Xiaobiao Xu, Ruijie Ye, Jiwei Tian, and Wei Zhao
Ocean Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/os-2019-29, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-2019-29, 2019
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents a detailed spatial structure and temporal variability of the deep circulation under enhanced mixing in the South China Sea (SCS) based on eddy-resolving model simulations verified by continuous current-meter observations and enables us to investigate sensitivity to distribution of mixing. Comparing the northern shelf of the SCS with the Luzon Strait, deep circulation in the SCS is more sensitive to the large vertical mixing parameters in the Zhongsha Island Chain area.
Nicole S. Lovenduski, Stephen G. Yeager, Keith Lindsay, and Matthew C. Long
Earth Syst. Dynam., 10, 45–57, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-10-45-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-10-45-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This paper shows that the absorption of carbon dioxide by the ocean is predictable several years in advance. This is important because fossil-fuel-derived carbon dioxide is largely responsible for anthropogenic global warming and because carbon dioxide emission management and global carbon cycle budgeting exercises can benefit from foreknowledge of ocean carbon absorption. The promising results from this new forecast system justify the need for additional oceanic observations.
Nikolay V. Koldunov and Luisa Cristini
Adv. Geosci., 45, 295–303, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-45-295-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-45-295-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
We believe that project managers can benefit from using programming languages in their work. In this paper we show several simple examples of how python programming language can be used for some of the basic text manipulation tasks, as well as describe more complicated test cases using a HORIZON 2020 type European project as an example.
Ali Aydoğdu, Nadia Pinardi, Emin Özsoy, Gokhan Danabasoglu, Özgür Gürses, and Alicia Karspeck
Ocean Sci., 14, 999–1019, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-14-999-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-14-999-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
A 6-year simulation of the Turkish Straits System is presented. The simulation is performed by a model using unstructured triangular mesh and realistic atmospheric forcing. The dynamics and circulation of the Marmara Sea are analysed and the mean state of the system is discussed on annual averages. Volume fluxes computed throughout the simulation are presented and the response of the model to severe storms is shown. Finally, it was possible to assess the kinetic energy budget in the Marmara Sea.
Qiang Wang, Claudia Wekerle, Sergey Danilov, Xuezhu Wang, and Thomas Jung
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1229–1255, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1229-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1229-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
For developing a system for Arctic research, we evaluate the Arctic Ocean simulated by FESOM. We use two global meshes differing in the horizontal resolution only in the Arctic Ocean (24 vs. 4.5 km). The high resolution significantly improves the model's representation of the Arctic Ocean. The most pronounced improvement is in the Arctic intermediate layer. The high resolution also improves the ocean surface circulation, mainly through a better representation of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago.
Seonmin Ahn, Baylor Fox-Kemper, Timothy Herbert, and Charles Lawrence
Clim. Past Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-2018-1, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-2018-1, 2018
Revised manuscript not accepted
Nikolay V. Koldunov, Armin Köhl, Nuno Serra, and Detlef Stammer
The Cryosphere, 11, 2265–2281, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2265-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2265-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
The paper describes one of the first attempts to use the so-called adjoint data assimilation method to bring Arctic Ocean model simulations closer to observation, especially in terms of the sea ice. It is shown that after assimilation the model bias in simulating the Arctic sea ice is considerably reduced. There is also additional improvement in the sea ice thickens representation that is not assimilated directly.
James C. Orr, Raymond G. Najjar, Olivier Aumont, Laurent Bopp, John L. Bullister, Gokhan Danabasoglu, Scott C. Doney, John P. Dunne, Jean-Claude Dutay, Heather Graven, Stephen M. Griffies, Jasmin G. John, Fortunat Joos, Ingeborg Levin, Keith Lindsay, Richard J. Matear, Galen A. McKinley, Anne Mouchet, Andreas Oschlies, Anastasia Romanou, Reiner Schlitzer, Alessandro Tagliabue, Toste Tanhua, and Andrew Yool
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 2169–2199, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2169-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2169-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
The Ocean Model Intercomparison Project (OMIP) is a model comparison effort under Phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). Its physical component is described elsewhere in this special issue. Here we describe its ocean biogeochemical component (OMIP-BGC), detailing simulation protocols and analysis diagnostics. Simulations focus on ocean carbon, other biogeochemical tracers, air-sea exchange of CO2 and related gases, and chemical tracers used to evaluate modeled circulation.
Anton Y. Dvornikov, Stanislav D. Martyanov, Vladimir A. Ryabchenko, Tatjana R. Eremina, Alexey V. Isaev, and Dmitry V. Sein
Earth Syst. Dynam., 8, 265–282, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-265-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-265-2017, 2017
Sergey Danilov, Dmitry Sidorenko, Qiang Wang, and Thomas Jung
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 765–789, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-765-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-765-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Numerical models of global ocean circulation are used to learn about future climate. The ocean circulation is characterized by processes on different spatial scales which are still beyond the reach of present computers. We describe a new model setup that allows one to vary a model's spatial resolution and hence focus the computational power on regional dynamics, reaching a better description of local processes in areas of interest.
Arin D. Nelson, Jeffrey B. Weiss, Baylor Fox-Kemper, Royce K. P. Zia, and Fabienne Gaillard
Ocean Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/os-2016-105, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-2016-105, 2017
Revised manuscript has not been submitted
Short summary
Short summary
We quantify the skill in observing the variability of global upper ocean heat content (OHC) by applying the ISAS13 observing strategy to a CCSM simulation. We find that variability is unreliably observed before 2005, while observed annual running means for 2005–2013 correlate well with model "truth" to a median of 95 %. When scaled to the real ocean, we find signal-to-noise ratios of 1.9 for pre-Argo times (1990–2005) and 14.7 after Argo is introduced (2005–2013). The global warming is robust.
George J. Boer, Douglas M. Smith, Christophe Cassou, Francisco Doblas-Reyes, Gokhan Danabasoglu, Ben Kirtman, Yochanan Kushnir, Masahide Kimoto, Gerald A. Meehl, Rym Msadek, Wolfgang A. Mueller, Karl E. Taylor, Francis Zwiers, Michel Rixen, Yohan Ruprich-Robert, and Rosie Eade
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 3751–3777, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3751-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3751-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The Decadal Climate Prediction Project (DCPP) investigates our ability to skilfully predict climate variations from a year to a decade ahead by means of a series of retrospective forecasts. Quasi-real-time forecasts are also produced for potential users. In addition, the DCPP investigates how perturbations such as volcanoes affect forecasts and, more broadly, what new information can be learned about the mechanisms governing climate variations by means of case studies of past climate behaviour.
Stephen M. Griffies, Gokhan Danabasoglu, Paul J. Durack, Alistair J. Adcroft, V. Balaji, Claus W. Böning, Eric P. Chassignet, Enrique Curchitser, Julie Deshayes, Helge Drange, Baylor Fox-Kemper, Peter J. Gleckler, Jonathan M. Gregory, Helmuth Haak, Robert W. Hallberg, Patrick Heimbach, Helene T. Hewitt, David M. Holland, Tatiana Ilyina, Johann H. Jungclaus, Yoshiki Komuro, John P. Krasting, William G. Large, Simon J. Marsland, Simona Masina, Trevor J. McDougall, A. J. George Nurser, James C. Orr, Anna Pirani, Fangli Qiao, Ronald J. Stouffer, Karl E. Taylor, Anne Marie Treguier, Hiroyuki Tsujino, Petteri Uotila, Maria Valdivieso, Qiang Wang, Michael Winton, and Stephen G. Yeager
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 3231–3296, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3231-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3231-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The Ocean Model Intercomparison Project (OMIP) aims to provide a framework for evaluating, understanding, and improving the ocean and sea-ice components of global climate and earth system models contributing to the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6). This document defines OMIP and details a protocol both for simulating global ocean/sea-ice models and for analysing their output.
C. Horvat and E. Tziperman
The Cryosphere, 9, 2119–2134, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-2119-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-2119-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Sea-ice cover is composed of floes of different sizes and thicknesses, whose distribution varies in space and time, and may affect the interaction between sea ice and the ocean and atmosphere, yet is not represented in climate models. We develop and demonstrate a model for the evolution of the joint distribution of floe sizes and thicknesses, subject to melting and freezing, mechanical interactions between floes, and the fracture of floes by waves, forced by atmospheric and ocean forcing fields.
S. Danilov, Q. Wang, R. Timmermann, N. Iakovlev, D. Sidorenko, M. Kimmritz, T. Jung, and J. Schröter
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 1747–1761, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1747-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1747-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Unstructured meshes allow multi-resolution modeling of ocean dynamics. Sea ice models formulated on unstructured meshes are a necessary component of ocean models intended for climate studies. This work presents a description of a finite-element sea ice model which is used as a component of a finite-element sea ice ocean circulation model. The principles underlying its design can be of interest to other groups pursuing ocean modelling on unstructured meshes.
N. Sudarchikova, U. Mikolajewicz, C. Timmreck, D. O'Donnell, G. Schurgers, D. Sein, and K. Zhang
Clim. Past, 11, 765–779, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-11-765-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-11-765-2015, 2015
I. A. Dmitrenko, S. A. Kirillov, N. Serra, N. V. Koldunov, V. V. Ivanov, U. Schauer, I. V. Polyakov, D. Barber, M. Janout, V. S. Lien, M. Makhotin, and Y. Aksenov
Ocean Sci., 10, 719–730, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-10-719-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-10-719-2014, 2014
P. Lin, Y. Song, Y. Yu, and H. Liu
Clim. Past Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/cpd-10-2519-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/cpd-10-2519-2014, 2014
Revised manuscript not accepted
Q. Wang, S. Danilov, D. Sidorenko, R. Timmermann, C. Wekerle, X. Wang, T. Jung, and J. Schröter
Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 663–693, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-663-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-663-2014, 2014
Related subject area
Oceanography
Advanced parallel implementation of the coupled ocean–ice model FEMAO (version 2.0) with load balancing
The Meridionally Averaged Model of Eastern Boundary Upwelling Systems (MAMEBUSv1.0)
Model-driven optimization of coastal sea observatories through data assimilation in a finite element hydrodynamic model (SHYFEM v. 7_5_65)
A simplified atmospheric boundary layer model for an improved representation of air–sea interactions in eddying oceanic models: implementation and first evaluation in NEMO (4.0)
Performance of offline passive tracer advection in the Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS; v3.6, revision 904)
Implementation and assessment of a carbonate system model (Eco3M-CarbOx v1.1) in a highly dynamic Mediterranean coastal site (Bay of Marseille, France)
Numerical integrators for Lagrangian oceanography
Multi-grid algorithm for passive tracer transport in the NEMO ocean circulation model: a case study with the NEMO OGCM (version 3.6)
Introducing LAB60: A 1∕60° NEMO 3.6 numerical simulation of the Labrador Sea
Development of an atmosphere–ocean coupled operational forecast model for the Maritime Continent: Part 1 – Evaluation of ocean forecasts
CSIRO Environmental Modelling Suite (EMS): scientific description of the optical and biogeochemical models (vB3p0)
Constraining the response of phytoplankton to zooplankton grazing and photo-acclimation in a temperate shelf sea with a 1-D model – towards S2P3 v8.0
The Regional Ice Ocean Prediction System v2: a pan-Canadian ocean analysis system
Doppio – a ROMS (v3.6)-based circulation model for the Mid-Atlantic Bight and Gulf of Maine: configuration and comparison to integrated coastal observing network observations
Evaluation of global ocean–sea-ice model simulations based on the experimental protocols of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (OMIP-2)
Representation of the Denmark Strait overflow in a z-coordinate eddying configuration of the NEMO (v3.6) ocean model: resolution and parameter impacts
Global Storm Tide Modeling with ADCIRC v55: Unstructured Mesh Design and Performance
A global eddying hindcast ocean simulation with OFES2
Tracking water masses using passive-tracer transport in NEMO v3.4 with NEMOTAM: application to North Atlantic Deep Water and North Atlantic Subtropical Mode Water
Sensitivity study on the main tidal constituents of the Gulf of Tonkin by using the frequency-domain tidal solver in T-UGOm
DINCAE 1.0: a convolutional neural network with error estimates to reconstruct sea surface temperature satellite observations
Mitigation of model bias influences on wave data assimilation with multiple assimilation systems using WaveWatch III v5.16 and SWAN v41.20
MOMSO 1.0 – an eddying Southern Ocean model configuration with fairly equilibrated natural carbon
Simulating barrier island response to sea level rise with the barrier island and inlet environment (BRIE) model v1.0
Dealing with discontinuous meteorological forcing in operational ocean modelling: a case study using ECMWF-IFS and GETM (v2.5)
The Parcels v2.0 Lagrangian framework: new field interpolation schemes
The INALT family – a set of high-resolution nests for the Agulhas Current system within global NEMO ocean/sea-ice configurations
Sensitivity of deep ocean biases to horizontal resolution in prototype CMIP6 simulations with AWI-CM1.0
OceanMesh2D 1.0: MATLAB-based software for two-dimensional unstructured mesh generation in coastal ocean modeling
Ocean carbon and nitrogen isotopes in CSIRO Mk3L-COAL version 1.0: a tool for palaeoceanographic research
A high-resolution biogeochemical model (ROMS 3.4 + bio_Fennel) of the East Australian Current system
Nemo-Nordic 1.0: a NEMO-based ocean model for the Baltic and North seas – research and operational applications
Ecological ReGional Ocean Model with vertically resolved sediments (ERGOM SED 1.0): coupling benthic and pelagic biogeochemistry of the south-western Baltic Sea
Reanalysis of the PacIOOS Hawaiian Island Ocean Forecast System, an implementation of the Regional Ocean Modeling System v3.6
Thetis coastal ocean model: discontinuous Galerkin discretization for the three-dimensional hydrostatic equations
Data assimilation cycle length and observation impact in mesoscale ocean forecasting
Verification of the mixed layer depth in the OceanMAPS operational forecast model for Austral autumn
A global scavenging and circulation ocean model of thorium-230 and protactinium-231 with improved particle dynamics (NEMO–ProThorP 0.1)
Veros v0.1 – a fast and versatile ocean simulator in pure Python
Cohesive and mixed sediment in the Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS v3.6) implemented in the Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere–Wave–Sediment Transport Modeling System (COAWST r1234)
OpenDrift v1.0: a generic framework for trajectory modelling
A 4.5 km resolution Arctic Ocean simulation with the global multi-resolution model FESOM 1.4
AMM15: a new high-resolution NEMO configuration for operational simulation of the European north-west shelf
SedFoam-2.0: a 3-D two-phase flow numerical model for sediment transport
Parcels v0.9: prototyping a Lagrangian ocean analysis framework for the petascale age
The Oceanographic Multipurpose Software Environment (OMUSE v1.0)
The CO5 configuration of the 7 km Atlantic Margin Model: large-scale biases and sensitivity to forcing, physics options and vertical resolution
Explicit representation and parametrised impacts of under ice shelf seas in the z∗ coordinate ocean model NEMO 3.6
“Climate response functions” for the Arctic Ocean: a proposed coordinated modelling experiment
The iFlow modelling framework v2.4: a modular idealized process-based model for flow and transport in estuaries
Pavel Perezhogin, Ilya Chernov, and Nikolay Iakovlev
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 843–857, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-843-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-843-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We describe the parallel implementation of the FEMAO model for an ice-covered sea with 2D Hilbert-curve domain decomposition. Load balancing is crucial because performance depends on the local depth. We propose, compare, and discuss four approaches to load balancing. The parallel library allowed us to modify the original sequential algorithm as little as possible. The performance increases almost linearly (tested with up to 996 CPU cores) for the model of the shallow White Sea.
Jordyn E. Moscoso, Andrew L. Stewart, Daniele Bianchi, and James C. McWilliams
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 763–794, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-763-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-763-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This project was created to understand the across-shore distribution of plankton in the California Current System. To complete this study, we used a quasi-2-D dynamical model coupled to an ecosystem model. This paper is a preliminary study to test and validate the model against data collected by the California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations (CalCOFI). We show the solution of our model solution compares well to the data and discuss our model as a tool for further model development.
Christian Ferrarin, Marco Bajo, and Georg Umgiesser
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 645–659, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-645-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-645-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The problem of the optimization of ocean monitoring networks is tackled through the implementation of data assimilation techniques in a numerical model. The methodology has been applied to the tide gauge network in the Lagoon of Venice (Italy). The data assimilation methods allow identifying the minimum number of stations and their distribution that correctly represent the lagoon's dynamics. The methodology is easily exportable to other environments and can be extended to other variables.
Florian Lemarié, Guillaume Samson, Jean-Luc Redelsperger, Hervé Giordani, Théo Brivoal, and Gurvan Madec
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 543–572, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-543-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-543-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
A simplified model of the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) of intermediate complexity between a bulk parameterization and a full three-dimensional atmospheric model has been developed and integrated to the NEMO ocean model.
An objective in the derivation of such a simplified model is to reach an apt representation of ocean-only numerical simulations of some of the key processes associated with air–sea interactions at the characteristic scales of the oceanic mesoscale.
Kristen M. Thyng, Daijiro Kobashi, Veronica Ruiz-Xomchuk, Lixin Qu, Xu Chen, and Robert D. Hetland
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 391–407, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-391-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-391-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We modified the ROMS model to run in offline mode so that previously run fields of sea surface height and velocity fields are input to calculate tracer advection without running the full model with a larger time step; thus, it is faster. The code was tested with two advection schemes, and both are robust with over 99 % accuracy of the offline to online run after 14 simulation days. This allows for ROMS users to maximize use of new or existing output to quickly run additional tracer simulations.
Katixa Lajaunie-Salla, Frédéric Diaz, Cathy Wimart-Rousseau, Thibaut Wagener, Dominique Lefèvre, Christophe Yohia, Irène Xueref-Remy, Brian Nathan, Alexandre Armengaud, and Christel Pinazo
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 295–321, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-295-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-295-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
A biogeochemical model of planktonic food webs including a carbonate balance module is applied in the Bay of Marseille (France) to represent the carbon marine cycle expected to change in the future owing to significant increases in anthropogenic emissions of CO2. The model correctly simulates the ranges and seasonal dynamics of most variables of the carbonate system (pH). This study shows that external physical forcings have an important impact on the carbonate equilibrium in this coastal area.
Tor Nordam and Rodrigo Duran
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5935–5957, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5935-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5935-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In applied oceanography, a common task is to calculate the trajectory of objects floating at the sea surface or submerged in the water. We have investigated different numerical methods for doing such calculations and discuss the benefits and challenges of some common methods. We then propose a small change to some common methods that make them more efficient for this particular application. This will allow researchers to obtain more accurate answers with fewer computer resources.
Clément Bricaud, Julien Le Sommer, Gurvan Madec, Christophe Calone, Julie Deshayes, Christian Ethe, Jérôme Chanut, and Marina Levy
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5465–5483, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5465-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5465-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In order to reduce the cost of ocean biogeochemical models, a multi-grid approach where ocean dynamics and tracer transport are computed with different spatial resolution has been developed in the NEMO v3.6 OGCM. Different experiments confirm that the spatial resolution of hydrodynamical fields can be coarsened without significantly affecting the resolved passive tracer fields. This approach leads to a factor of 7 reduction of the overhead associated with running a full biogeochemical model.
Clark Pennelly and Paul G. Myers
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4959–4975, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4959-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4959-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
A high-resolution ocean simulation was carried out within the Labrador Sea, a region that low-resolution climate simulations may misrepresent. We show that small-scale eddies and their associated transport are better resolved at higher resolution than at lower resolution. These eddies transport important properties to the interior of the Labrador Sea, impacting the stratification and reducing the convection extent so that it is far more accurate when compared to what observations suggest.
Bijoy Thompson, Claudio Sanchez, Boon Chong Peter Heng, Rajesh Kumar, Jianyu Liu, Xiang-Yu Huang, and Pavel Tkalich
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-326, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-326, 2020
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
This article describes the development and ocean forecast evaluation of an atmosphere-ocean coupled prediction system for the Maritime Continent domain, which includes the eastern Indian and western Pacific Oceans. The coupled system comprises regional configurations of the atmospheric model MetUM and ocean model NEMO, coupled using the OASIS3-MCT libraries. The model forecast deviation of selected fields relative to observation is within acceptable error limits of operational forecast models.
Mark E. Baird, Karen A. Wild-Allen, John Parslow, Mathieu Mongin, Barbara Robson, Jennifer Skerratt, Farhan Rizwi, Monika Soja-Woźniak, Emlyn Jones, Mike Herzfeld, Nugzar Margvelashvili, John Andrewartha, Clothilde Langlais, Matthew P. Adams, Nagur Cherukuru, Malin Gustafsson, Scott Hadley, Peter J. Ralph, Uwe Rosebrock, Thomas Schroeder, Leonardo Laiolo, Daniel Harrison, and Andrew D. L. Steven
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4503–4553, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4503-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4503-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
For 20+ years, the Commonwealth Science Industry and Research Organisation (CSIRO) has been developing a biogeochemical (BGC) model for coupling with a hydrodynamic and sediment model for application in estuaries, coastal waters and shelf seas. This paper provides a full mathematical description (equations, parameters), model evaluation and access to the numerical code. The model is particularly suited to applications in shallow waters where benthic processes are critical to ecosystem function.
Angela A. Bahamondes Dominguez, Anna E. Hickman, Robert Marsh, and C. Mark Moore
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4019–4040, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4019-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4019-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The central Celtic Sea has previously been studied with a 1-D model called S2P3, showing discrepancies between observations and the model results due to poor representation of some processes. Therefore, the S2P3 model was developed to include zooplankton and phytoplankton cells' adaptation to changes in irradiance. Results demonstrate that better agreement with biological observations can be achieved when the model includes these processes and is adequately constrained.
Gregory C. Smith, Yimin Liu, Mounir Benkiran, Kamel Chikhar, Dorina Surcel Colan, Charles-Emmanuel Testut, Frederic Dupont, Ji Lei, François Roy, Jean-Francois Lemieux, and Fraser Davidson
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-255, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-255, 2020
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
Canada's coastlines include a diversity of ocean environments. In response to the strong need to support marine activities and security, we present the first pan-Canadian operational regional ocean analysis system. A novel online tidal harmonic analysis method is introduced that uses a sliding-window approach. Innovations are compared those from the Canadian global analysis system. Particular improvements are found near the Gulf Stream due to the higher model grid-resolution.
Alexander G. López, John L. Wilkin, and Julia C. Levin
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3709–3729, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3709-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3709-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This article describes a regional circulation model, Doppio, for the Mid-Atlantic Bight and the Gulf of Maine. The model demonstrates useful skill in comparison to a comprehensive suite of observations. Development focused on achieving a model configuration that allows decadal-scale simulations of physical ocean circulation that can underpin studies of ecosystems and biogeochemistry. Doppio captures the temperature and salinity stratification well, along with the large-scale mean circulation.
Hiroyuki Tsujino, L. Shogo Urakawa, Stephen M. Griffies, Gokhan Danabasoglu, Alistair J. Adcroft, Arthur E. Amaral, Thomas Arsouze, Mats Bentsen, Raffaele Bernardello, Claus W. Böning, Alexandra Bozec, Eric P. Chassignet, Sergey Danilov, Raphael Dussin, Eleftheria Exarchou, Pier Giuseppe Fogli, Baylor Fox-Kemper, Chuncheng Guo, Mehmet Ilicak, Doroteaciro Iovino, Who M. Kim, Nikolay Koldunov, Vladimir Lapin, Yiwen Li, Pengfei Lin, Keith Lindsay, Hailong Liu, Matthew C. Long, Yoshiki Komuro, Simon J. Marsland, Simona Masina, Aleksi Nummelin, Jan Klaus Rieck, Yohan Ruprich-Robert, Markus Scheinert, Valentina Sicardi, Dmitry Sidorenko, Tatsuo Suzuki, Hiroaki Tatebe, Qiang Wang, Stephen G. Yeager, and Zipeng Yu
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3643–3708, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3643-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3643-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The OMIP-2 framework for global ocean–sea-ice model simulations is assessed by comparing multi-model means from 11 CMIP6-class global ocean–sea-ice models calculated separately for the OMIP-1 and OMIP-2 simulations. Many features are very similar between OMIP-1 and OMIP-2 simulations, and yet key improvements in transitioning from OMIP-1 to OMIP-2 are also identified. Thus, the present assessment justifies that future ocean–sea-ice model development and analysis studies use the OMIP-2 framework.
Pedro Colombo, Bernard Barnier, Thierry Penduff, Jérôme Chanut, Julie Deshayes, Jean-Marc Molines, Julien Le Sommer, Polina Verezemskaya, Sergey Gulev, and Anne-Marie Treguier
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3347–3371, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3347-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3347-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In the ocean circulation model NEMO, the representation of the overflow of dense Arctic waters through the Denmark Strait is investigated. In this
z-coordinate context, sensitivity tests show that the mixing parameterizations preferably act along the model grid slope. Thus, the representation of the overflow is more sensitive to resolution than to parameterization and is best when the numerical grid matches the local topographic slope.
William J. Pringle, Damrongsak Wirasaet, Keith J. Roberts, and Joannes J. Westerink
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-123, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-123, 2020
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
We improve and test a computer model that simulates tides and storm surge over all of Earth's oceans and seas. The model varies mesh resolution (triangular element sizes) freely so that coastal areas, especially storm landfall locations, are well-described. We develop systematic tests of the resolution in order to suggest good mesh design criteria that balances computational efficiency with accuracy for both global astronomical tides and coastal storm tides under extreme weather forcing.
Hideharu Sasaki, Shinichiro Kida, Ryo Furue, Hidenori Aiki, Nobumasa Komori, Yukio Masumoto, Toru Miyama, Masami Nonaka, Yoshikazu Sasai, and Bunmei Taguchi
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3319–3336, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3319-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3319-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
A quasi-global eddying ocean hindcast simulation using a new version of our model, called OFES2, was conducted to overcome several issues in its previous version. OFES2 simulated oceanic fields from 1958 to 2016 with improved global sea surface temperature and salinity, water mass properties in the Indonesian and Arabian seas, and Niño3.4 and Indian Ocean Dipole indexes. The output from OFES2 will be useful in studying various oceanic phenomena with broad spatiotemporal scales.
Dafydd Stephenson, Simon A. Müller, and Florian Sévellec
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2031–2050, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2031-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2031-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Different water types are created at the sea surface with a signature based on the local conditions of the atmosphere. They then take these conditions with them into the deeper ocean, and so their journey is an important climate process to understand. In this study, we modify and repurpose a specialised model which simulates the ocean forward and backward in time to determine where new ocean water goes, where at the surface existing water comes from, and how old it is, by tracking it as a dye.
Violaine Piton, Marine Herrmann, Florent Lyard, Patrick Marsaleix, Thomas Duhaut, Damien Allain, and Sylvain Ouillon
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1583–1607, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1583-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1583-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Consequences of tidal dynamics on hydro-sedimentary processes are a recurrent issue in estuarine and coastal processes studies, and accurate tidal solutions are a prerequisite for modeling sediment transport. This study presents the implementation and optimization of a model configuration in terms of bathymetry and bottom friction and assess the influence of these parameters on tidal solutions, in a macro-tidal environment: the Gulf of Tonkin (Vietnam).
Alexander Barth, Aida Alvera-Azcárate, Matjaz Licer, and Jean-Marie Beckers
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1609–1622, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1609-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1609-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
DINCAE is a method for reconstructing missing data in satellite datasets using a neural network. Satellite observations working in the optical and infrared bands are affected by clouds, which obscure part of the ocean underneath. In this paper, a neural network with the structure of a convolutional auto-encoder is developed to reconstruct the missing data based on the available cloud-free pixels in satellite images.
Jiangyu Li and Shaoqing Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1035–1054, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1035-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1035-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Two assimilation systems developed using two nearly independent wave models are used to study the influences of various error sources including mode bias on wave data assimilation; a statistical method is explored to make full use of the merits of individual assimilation systems for bias correction, thus improving wave analysis greatly. This study opens a door to further our understanding of physical processes in waves and associated air–sea interactions for improving wave modeling.
Heiner Dietze, Ulrike Löptien, and Julia Getzlaff
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 71–97, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-71-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-71-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We present a new near-global coupled biogeochemical ocean-circulation model configuration of the Southern Ocean. The configuration features both a relatively equilibrated oceanic carbon inventory and an explicit representation of mesoscale eddies. In this paper, we document the model configuration and showcase its potential to tackle research questions such as the Southern Ocean carbon uptake dynamics on decadal timescales.
Jaap H. Nienhuis and Jorge Lorenzo-Trueba
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4013–4030, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4013-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4013-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
The response of barrier islands to sea level rise depends on their ability to move landward through the transport of sediment from the beach to the back barrier. The BRIE model simulates these processes and the resulting landward movement of barrier islands. The novelty of the BRIE model is the incorporation of tidal inlets (gaps between barrier islands) that can transport sediment landward and therefore help keep barrier islands above sea level.
Bjarne Büchmann
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3915–3922, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3915-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3915-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Operational forecasting of the ocean state – e.g. used for ship route planning, sea rescue, and oil spill drift models – relies on data (forcing) obtained from weather forecasting. Unfortunately, the so-called meteorological analysis step introduces a discontinuity, which affects the ocean models adversely. In the present paper, a straightforward method to deal with the issue is introduced. Practical examples are given to illuminate the scale of the problem.
Philippe Delandmeter and Erik van Sebille
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3571–3584, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3571-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3571-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Parcels is a framework to compute how ocean currents transport
stuffsuch as plankton and plastic around. In the latest version 2.0 of Parcels, we focus on more accurate interpolation schemes and implement methods to seamlessly combine data from different sources (such as winds and currents, possibly in different regions). We show that this framework is very efficient for tracking how microplastic is transported through the North Sea into the Arctic.
Franziska U. Schwarzkopf, Arne Biastoch, Claus W. Böning, Jérôme Chanut, Jonathan V. Durgadoo, Klaus Getzlaff, Jan Harlaß, Jan K. Rieck, Christina Roth, Markus M. Scheinert, and René Schubert
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3329–3355, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3329-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3329-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
A family of nested global ocean general circulation model configurations, the INALT family, has been established with resolutions of 1/10°, 1/20° and 1/60° in the South Atlantic and western Indian oceans, covering the greater Agulhas Current (AC) system. The INALT family provides a consistent set of configurations that allows to address eddy dynamics in the AC system and their impact on the large-scale ocean circulation.
Thomas Rackow, Dmitry V. Sein, Tido Semmler, Sergey Danilov, Nikolay V. Koldunov, Dmitry Sidorenko, Qiang Wang, and Thomas Jung
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2635–2656, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2635-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2635-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Current climate models show errors in the deep ocean that are larger than the level of natural variability and the response to enhanced greenhouse gas concentrations. These errors are larger than the signals we aim to predict. With the AWI Climate Model, we show that increasing resolution to resolve eddies can lead to major reductions in deep ocean errors. AWI's next-generation (CMIP6) model configuration will thus use locally eddy-resolving computational grids for projecting climate change.
Keith J. Roberts, William J. Pringle, and Joannes J. Westerink
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1847–1868, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1847-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1847-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Computer simulations can be used to reproduce the dynamics of the ocean near the coast. These simulations often use a mesh of triangles to represent the domain since they can be orientated and disparately sized in such a way to accurately fit the coastline shape. This paper describes a software package (OceanMesh2D v1.0) that has been developed in order to automatically and objectively design triangular meshes based on geospatial data inputs that represent the coastline and ocean depths.
Pearse J. Buchanan, Richard J. Matear, Zanna Chase, Steven J. Phipps, and Nathan L. Bindoff
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1491–1523, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1491-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1491-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Oceanic sediment cores are commonly used to understand past climates. The composition of the sediments changes with the ocean above it. An understanding of oceanographic conditions that existed many thousands of years ago, in some cases many millions of years ago, can therefore be extracted from sediment cores. We simulate two chemical signatures (13C and 15N) of sediment cores in a model. This study assesses the model before it is applied to reinterpret the sedimentary record.
Carlos Rocha, Christopher A. Edwards, Moninya Roughan, Paulina Cetina-Heredia, and Colette Kerry
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 441–456, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-441-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-441-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Off southeast Australia, the East Australian Current (EAC) moves warm nutrient-poor waters towards the pole. In this region, the EAC and a large number of vortices pinching off it strongly affect phytoplankton’s access to nutrients and light. To study these dynamics, we created a numerical model that is able to solve the ocean conditions and how they modulate the foundation of the region’s ecosystem. We validated model results against available data and this showed that the model performs well.
Robinson Hordoir, Lars Axell, Anders Höglund, Christian Dieterich, Filippa Fransner, Matthias Gröger, Ye Liu, Per Pemberton, Semjon Schimanke, Helen Andersson, Patrik Ljungemyr, Petter Nygren, Saeed Falahat, Adam Nord, Anette Jönsson, Iréne Lake, Kristofer Döös, Magnus Hieronymus, Heiner Dietze, Ulrike Löptien, Ivan Kuznetsov, Antti Westerlund, Laura Tuomi, and Jari Haapala
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 363–386, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-363-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-363-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Nemo-Nordic is a regional ocean model based on a community code (NEMO). It covers the Baltic and the North Sea area and is used as a forecast model by the Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute. It is also used as a research tool by scientists of several countries to study, for example, the effects of climate change on the Baltic and North seas. Using such a model permits us to understand key processes in this coastal ecosystem and how such processes will change in a future climate.
Hagen Radtke, Marko Lipka, Dennis Bunke, Claudia Morys, Jana Woelfel, Bronwyn Cahill, Michael E. Böttcher, Stefan Forster, Thomas Leipe, Gregor Rehder, and Thomas Neumann
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 275–320, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-275-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-275-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes a coupled benthic–pelagic biogeochemical model, ERGOM-SED. We demonstrate its use in a one-dimensional physical model, which is horizontally integrated and vertically resolved. We describe the application of the model to seven stations in the south-western Baltic Sea. The model was calibrated using pore water profiles from these stations. We compare the model results to these and to measured sediment compositions, benthopelagic fluxes and bioturbation intensities.
Dale Partridge, Tobias Friedrich, and Brian S. Powell
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 195–213, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-195-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-195-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This paper demonstrates the improvements made to an operational ocean forecast model around the Hawaiian Islands by performing a reanalysis of the model over a 10-year period. Using a number of different measurements we show the role a variety of observations play in producing the forecast, in particular the contribution of high-frequency radar.
Tuomas Kärnä, Stephan C. Kramer, Lawrence Mitchell, David A. Ham, Matthew D. Piggott, and António M. Baptista
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4359–4382, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4359-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4359-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Unstructured meshes are attractive for coastal ocean modeling, as they allow more accurate representation of complex coastal topography. Unstructured mesh models are, however, often perceived as slow and inaccurate. We present a novel discontinuous Galerkin ocean model: Thetis. We demonstrate that the model is able to simulate baroclinic ocean flows with high accuracy on a triangular prismatic mesh. This work paves the way for highly accurate and efficient three-dimensional coastal ocean models.
Paul Sandery
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4011–4019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4011-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4011-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
This article compares global mesoscale ocean forecasts with different data assimilation cycle lengths. Mean absolute increment is used to quantify differences in the overall impact of observations. Greater observation impact does not necessarily improve a forecast system. Experiments show a 1-day cycle generates improved 7-day forecasts when compared to a 3-day cycle. Cycle length is an important choice that influences system bias and predictability.
Daniel Boettger, Robin Robertson, and Gary B. Brassington
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3795–3805, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3795-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3795-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
This study focuses on the impact of the model vertical mixing parameterisation on the representation of the mixed layer depth (MLD) in ocean forecast models. We compare data from two recent versions of the OceanMAPS forecast system, and find that while there were large improvements in the later version of the model, the skill of each parameterisation varies with spatial location.
Marco van Hulten, Jean-Claude Dutay, and Matthieu Roy-Barman
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3537–3556, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3537-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3537-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
We present an ocean model of the natural radioactive isotopes thorium-230 and protactinium-231. These isotopes are often used to investigate past ocean circulation and particle transport. They are removed by particles produced by plankton and from uplifted desert dust that is deposited into the ocean. We approach observed dissolved and adsorbed Th-230 and Pa-231 activities. The Pa-231 / Th-230 sedimentation ratio is reproduced as well; this quantity can be used as a proxy for ocean circulation.
Dion Häfner, René Løwe Jacobsen, Carsten Eden, Mads R. B. Kristensen, Markus Jochum, Roman Nuterman, and Brian Vinter
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3299–3312, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3299-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3299-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Well-performing, easy-to-use ocean models are a central ingredient to further the understanding of our Earth and climate. Veros, the versatile ocean simulator, is the first full-blown ocean model entirely written in the high-level programming language Python. It is considerably more approachable than traditional Fortran models and leverages modern best practices; at the same time, thanks to the Bohrium framework, Veros is about half as fast as a reference implementation in Fortran 90.
Christopher R. Sherwood, Alfredo L. Aretxabaleta, Courtney K. Harris, J. Paul Rinehimer, Romaric Verney, and Bénédicte Ferré
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1849–1871, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1849-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1849-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Cohesive sediment (mud) is ubiquitous in the world's coastal regions, but its behavior is complicated and often oversimplified by computer models. This paper describes extensions to a widely used open-source coastal ocean model that allow users to simulate important components of cohesive sediment transport.
Knut-Frode Dagestad, Johannes Röhrs, Øyvind Breivik, and Bjørn Ådlandsvik
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1405–1420, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1405-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1405-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
We have developed a computer code with ability to predict how various substances and objects drift in the ocean. This may be used to, e.g. predict the drift of oil to aid cleanup operations, the drift of man-over-board or lifeboats to aid search and rescue operations, or the drift of fish eggs and larvae to understand and manage fish stocks. This new code merges all such applications into one software tool, allowing to optimise and channel any available resources and developments.
Qiang Wang, Claudia Wekerle, Sergey Danilov, Xuezhu Wang, and Thomas Jung
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1229–1255, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1229-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1229-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
For developing a system for Arctic research, we evaluate the Arctic Ocean simulated by FESOM. We use two global meshes differing in the horizontal resolution only in the Arctic Ocean (24 vs. 4.5 km). The high resolution significantly improves the model's representation of the Arctic Ocean. The most pronounced improvement is in the Arctic intermediate layer. The high resolution also improves the ocean surface circulation, mainly through a better representation of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago.
Jennifer A. Graham, Enda O'Dea, Jason Holt, Jeff Polton, Helene T. Hewitt, Rachel Furner, Karen Guihou, Ashley Brereton, Alex Arnold, Sarah Wakelin, Juan Manuel Castillo Sanchez, and C. Gabriela Mayorga Adame
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 681–696, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-681-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-681-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes the next-generation ocean forecast model for the European NW shelf, AMM15 (Atlantic Margin Model, 1.5 km resolution). The current forecast system has a resolution of 7 km. While this is sufficient to represent large-scale circulation, many dynamical features (such as eddies, frontal jets, and internal tides) can only begin to be resolved at 0–1 km resolution. Here we introduce AMM15 and demonstrate its ability to represent the mean state and variability of the region.
Julien Chauchat, Zhen Cheng, Tim Nagel, Cyrille Bonamy, and Tian-Jian Hsu
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4367–4392, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4367-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4367-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
This manuscript presents the development and validation of a two-phase flow Eulerian-Eulerian model based on OpenFOAM for sediment transport applications. The mathematical and numerical models are described in detail. The numerical implementation is demonstrated on four test cases: sedimentation of suspended particles, laminar bed load, sheet flow, and scour at an apron. These test cases illustrate the capabilities of SedFoam to deal with complex turbulent sediment transport problems.
Michael Lange and Erik van Sebille
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4175–4186, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4175-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4175-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Here, we present version 0.9 of Parcels (Probably A Really Computationally Efficient Lagrangian Simulator). Parcels is an experimental prototype code aimed at exploring novel approaches for Lagrangian tracking of virtual ocean particles in the petascale age. The modularity, flexibility and scalability will allow the code to be used to track water, nutrients, microbes, plankton, plastic and even fish.
Inti Pelupessy, Ben van Werkhoven, Arjen van Elteren, Jan Viebahn, Adam Candy, Simon Portegies Zwart, and Henk Dijkstra
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3167–3187, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3167-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3167-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Researchers from the Netherlands present OMUSE, a software package
developed from core technology originating in the astrophysical
community. Using OMUSE, oceanographic and climate researchers can
develop numerical models of the ocean and the interactions between
different parts of the ocean and the atmosphere. This provides a novel
way to investigate, for example, the local effects of climate change on
the ocean. OMUSE is freely available as open-source software.
Enda O'Dea, Rachel Furner, Sarah Wakelin, John Siddorn, James While, Peter Sykes, Robert King, Jason Holt, and Helene Hewitt
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 2947–2969, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2947-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2947-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
An update to an ocean modelling configuration for the European North West Shelf is described. It is assessed against observations and climatologies for 1981–2012. Sensitivities in the model configuration updates are assessed to understand changes in the model system. The model improves upon an existing model of the region, although there remain some areas with significant biases. The paper highlights the dependence upon the quality of the river inputs.
Pierre Mathiot, Adrian Jenkins, Christopher Harris, and Gurvan Madec
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 2849–2874, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2849-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2849-2017, 2017
John Marshall, Jeffery Scott, and Andrey Proshutinsky
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 2833–2848, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2833-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2833-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
A coordinated set of Arctic modeling experiments is proposed which explores how the Arctic responds to abrupt changes in external forcing by computing
climate response functions(CRFs). We illustrate the approach in the context of a coarse-resolution model of the Arctic and conclude by encouraging other modeling groups to compute CRFs with their own models so that we might begin to document how robust they are to model formulation, resolution, and parameterization.
Yoeri M. Dijkstra, Ronald L. Brouwer, Henk M. Schuttelaars, and George P. Schramkowski
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 2691–2713, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2691-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2691-2017, 2017
Cited articles
Ajayi, A., Le Sommer, J., Chassignet, E., Molines, J.-M., Xu, X., Albert, A.,
and Cosme, E.: Spatial and temporal variability of the North Atlantic eddy
field from two kilometric-resolution ocean models, J. Geophy. Res.-Oceans,
125, e2019JC015827, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015827, 2020.
Bamber, J. L., Tedstone, A. J., King, M. D., Howat, I. M., Enderlin, E. M.,
van den Broeke, M. R., and Noel, B.: Land ice freshwater budget of the Arctic and North Atlantic Oceans: 1. Data, methods, and results, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 123, 1827–1837, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JC013605, 2018.
Banzon, V. F., Reynolds, R. W., Stokes, D., and Xue, Y.: A 1/4∘
spatial-resolution daily sea surface temperature climatology
based on a blended satellite and in situ analysis, J. Climate, 27, 8221–8228,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00293.1, 2014.
Bao, Q., Lin, P., Zhou, T., Liu, Y., Yu, Y., Wu, G., He, B., He, J., Li, L.,
Li, J., Li, Y., Liu, H., Qiao, F., Song, Z., Wang, B., Wang, J., Wang, P.,
Wang, X., Wang, Z., Wu, B., Wu, T., Xu, Y., Yu, H., Zhao, W., Zheng, W., and
Zhou, L.: The Flexible Global Ocean-Atmosphere-Land system model, Spectral
Version 2: FGOALS-s2, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 30, 561–576,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-012-2113-9, 2013.
Baringer, M. O. and Garzoli, S. L.: Meridional heat transport determined
with expendable bathythermographs-Part I: Error estimates from model and
hydrographic data, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 54, 1390–1401,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2007.03.011, 2007.
Bateson, A. W., Feltham, D. L., Schröder, D., Hosekova, L., Ridley, J. K., and Aksenov, Y.: Impact of sea ice floe size distribution on seasonal fragmentation and melt of Arctic sea ice, The Cryosphere, 14, 403–428, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-403-2020, 2020.
Bleck, R.: An oceanic general circulation model framed in hybrid
isopycnic-Cartesian coordinates, Ocean Model., 4, 55–88,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1463-5003(01)00012-9, 2002.
Bryan, F. O., Tomas, R., Dennis, J. M., Chelton, D. B., Loeb, N. G., and
McClean, J. L.: Frontal Scale Air–Sea Interaction in High-Resolution
Coupled Climate Models, J. Climate, 23, 6277–6291,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3665.1, 2010.
Callies, J., Flierl, G., Ferrari, R., and Fox-Kemper, B.: The role of
mixed-layer instabilities in submesoscale turbulence, J. Fluid Mech., 788,
5–41, https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2015.700, 2016.
Canuto, V. M., Howard, A., Cheng, Y., and Dubovikov, M. S.: Ocean turbulence.
Part I: One-point closure model–momentum and heat vertical diffusivities,
J. Phys. Oceanogr., 31, 1413–1426,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2001)031<1413:OTPIOP>2.0.CO;2,
2001.
Canuto, V. M., Howard, A., Cheng, Y., and Dubovikov, M. S.: Ocean turbulence.
Part II: Vertical diffusivities of momentum, heat, salt, mass, and passive
scalars, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 32, 240–264,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2002)032<0240:OTPIVD>2.0.CO;2,
2002.
Carnes, M., Helber, R. W., Barron, C. N., and Dastugue, J. M.: Validation test report for GDEM4, Technical Report NRL, Stennis, MS, 66 pp., 2010.
Chassignet, E. P., Smith, L. T., Halliwell, G. R., and Bleck, R.: North
Atlantic simulations with the Hybrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM): Impact
of the vertical coordinate choice, reference pressure, and thermobaricity,
J. Phys. Oceanogr., 33, 2504–2526,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2003)033<2504:NASWTH>2.0.CO;2,
2003.
Chassignet, E. P. and Marshall, D. P.: Gulf Stream separation in numerical
ocean models, in: Geophysical Monograph Series, 177, 39–61, 2008.
Chassignet, E. P. and Xu, X.: Impact of horizontal resolution
(1/12∘ to 1/50∘) on Gulf Stream separation,
penetration, and variability, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 47, 1999–2021,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-17-0031.1, 2017.
Chassignet, E. P., Yeager, S. G., Fox-Kemper, B., Bozec, A., Castruccio, F.,
Danabasoglu, G., Kim, W. M., Koldunov, N., Li, Y., Lin, P., Liu, H., Sein,
D., Sidorenko, D., Wang, Q., and Xu, X.: Impact of horizontal resolution on
the energetics of global ocean-sea-ice model simulations, CLIVAR
Variations/Exchanges, 18, 23–30, https://doi.org/10.5065/g8w0-fy32, 2020a.
Chassignet, E. P., Yeager, S. G., Fox-Kemper, B., Bozec, A., Castruccio,
F., Danabasoglu, G., Kim, W. M., Koldunov, N., Li, Y.,
Lin, P., Liu, H., Sein, D., Sidorenko, D., Wang, Q., and Xu, X.: Impact of horizontal resolution on global ocean-sea-ice model simulations based on the experimental protocols of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (OMIP-2) (Version v2.0) [Data set], Geoscientific Model Development, Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3934822, 2020b.
Craig, A. P., Vertenstein, M., and Jacob, R.: A new flexible coupler for
earth system modeling developed for CCSM4 and CESM1, Int. J. High Perform.
Comput. Appl., 26, 31–42, https://doi.org/10.1177/1094342011428141, 2012.
Cunningham, S. A.: Transport and variability of the Antarctic Circumpolar
Current in Drake Passage, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8084,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JC001147, 2003.
Danabasoglu, G., Bates, S. C., Briegleb, B. P., Jayne, S. R., Jochum, M.,
Large, W. G., Peacock, S., and Yeager, S. G.: The CCSM4 Ocean Component, J. Climate, 25, 1361–1389, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00091.1, 2012.
Danabasoglu, G., Ferrari, R., and McWilliams, J. C.: Sensitivity of an ocean
general circulation model to a parameterization of near-surface eddy fluxes,
J. Climate, 21, 1192–1208, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI1508.1, 2008.
Danabasoglu, G., Large, W. G., and Briegleb, B. P.: Climate impacts of
parameterized Nordic Sea overflows, J. Geophys. Res., 115, C11005,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JC006243, 2010.
Danabasoglu, G. and Marshall, J.: Effects of vertical variations of
thickness diffusivity in an ocean general circulation model, Ocean Model.,
18, 122–141, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2007.03.006, 2007.
Danabasoglu, G., Yeager, S. G., Bailey, D., Behrens, E., Bentsen, M., Bi,
D., Biastoch, A., Böning, C., Bozec, A., Canuto, V. M., Cassou, C.,
Chassignet, E., Coward, A. C., Danilov, S., Diansky, N., Drange, H.,
Farneti, R., Fernandez, E., Fogli, P. G., Forget, G., Fujii, Y., Griffies,
S. M., Gusev, A., Heimbach, P., Howard, A., Jung, T., Kelley, M., Large, W.
G., Leboissetier, A., Lu, J., Madec, G., Marsland, S. J., Masina, S.,
Navarra, A., George Nurser, A. J., Pirani, A., y Mélia, D. S., Samuels,
B. L., Scheinert, M., Sidorenko, D., Treguier, A. M., Tsujino, H., Uotila,
P., Valcke, S., Voldoire, A., and Wang, Q.: North Atlantic simulations in
Coordinated Ocean-ice Reference Experiments phase II (CORE-II). Part I: Mean
states, Ocean Model., 73, 76–107, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2013.10.005, 2014.
Danabasoglu, G., Yeager, S. G., Kim, W. M., Behrens, E., Bentsen, M., Bi,
D., Biastoch, A., Bleck, R., Böning, C., Bozec, A., Canuto, V. M.,
Cassou, C., Chassignet, E., Coward, A. C., Danilov, S., Diansky, N., Drange,
H., Farneti, R., Fernandez, E., Fogli, P. G., Forget, G., Fujii, Y.,
Griffies, S. M., Gusev, A., Heimbach, P., Howard, A., Ilicak, M., Jung, T.,
Karspeck, A. R., Kelley, M., Large, W. G., Leboissetier, A., Lu, J., Madec,
G., Marsland, S. J., Masina, S., Navarra, A., Nurser, A. J. G., Pirani, A.,
Romanou, A., David, S. y. M., Samuels, B. L., Scheinert, M., Sidorenko, D.,
Sun, S., Treguier, A. M., Tsujino, H., Uotila, P., Valcke, S., Voldoire, A.,
Wang, Q., and Yashayaev, I.: North Atlantic simulations in Coordinated
Ocean-ice Reference Experiments phase II (CORE-II). Part II: Inter-annual to
decadal variability, Ocean Model., 97, 65–90,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.11.007, 2016.
Danabasoglu, G., Lamarque, J. -F., Bachmeister, J., Bailey, D. A., DuVivier, A. K., Edwards, J., Emmons, L. K., Fasullo, J., Garcia, R., Gettelman, A., Hannay, C., Holland, M. M., Large, W. G., Lawrence, D. M., Lenaerts, J. T. M., Lindsay, K., Lipscomb, W. H., Mills, M. J., Neale, R., Oleson, K. W., Otto-Bliesner, B., Phillips, A. S., Sacks, W., Tilmes, S., van Kampenhout, L., Vertenstein, M., Bertini, A., Dennis, J., Deser, C., Fischer, C., Fox-Kember, B., Kay, J. E., Kinnison, D., Kushner, P. J., Long, M. C., Mickelson, S., Moore, J. K., Nienhouse, E., Polvani, L., Rasch, P. J., and Strand, W. G.: The Community Earth System Model version 2 (CESM2), J. Adv. Model. Earth Sys., 12, e2019MS001916, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001916, 2020.
Danilov, S., Wang, Q., Timmermann, R., Iakovlev, N., Sidorenko, D., Kimmritz, M., Jung, T., and Schröter, J.: Finite-Element Sea Ice Model (FESIM), version 2, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 1747–1761, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1747-2015, 2015.
Danilov, S., Kivman, G., and Schröter, J.: A finite-element ocean model:
Principles and evaluation, Ocean Model., 6, 125–150,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1463-5003(02)00063-X, 2004.
Depoorter, M. A., Bamber, J. L., Griggs, J. A., Lenaerts, J. T. M.,
Ligtenberg, S. R. M., Van Den Broeke, M. R., and Moholdt, G.: Calving fluxes
and basal melt rates of Antarctic ice shelves, Nature, 502, 89–92,
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12567, 2013.
Dong, S., Garzoli, S., Baringer, M., Meinen, C., and Goni, G.: Interannual
variations in the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation and its
relationship with the net northward heat transport in the South Atlantic,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L20606, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL039356, 2009.
Dong, S., Goni, G., and Bringas, F.: Temporal variability of the South
Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation between 20∘ S and
35∘ S, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 7655–7662,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065603, 2015.
Donohue, K. A., Tracey, K. L., Watts, D. R., Chidichimo, M. P., and
Chereskin, T. K.: Mean Antarctic Circumpolar Current transport measured in
Drake Passage, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 11760–11767,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070319, 2016.
Downes, S. M., Farneti, R., Uotila, P., Griffies, S. M., Marsland, S. J.,
Bailey, D., Behrens, E., Bentsen, M., Bi, D., Biastoch, A., Böning, C.,
Bozec, A., Canuto, V. M., Chassignet, E., Danabasoglu, G., Danilov, S.,
Diansky, N., Drange, H., Fogli, P. G., Gusev, A., Howard, A., Ilicak, M.,
Jung, T., Kelley, M., Large, W. G., Leboissetier, A., Long, M., Lu, J.,
Masina, S., Mishra, A., Navarra, A., George Nurser, A. J., Patara, L.,
Samuels, B. L., Sidorenko, D., Spence, P., Tsujino, H., Wang, Q., and Yeager,
S. G.: An assessment of Southern Ocean water masses and sea ice during
1988-2007 in a suite of interannual CORE-II simulations, Ocean Model., 94,
67–94, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.07.022, 2015.
Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G. A., Senior, C. A., Stevens, B., Stouffer, R. J., and Taylor, K. E.: Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1937–1958, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016, 2016.
Farneti, R., Downes, S. M., Griffies, S. M., Marsland, S. J., Behrens, E.,
Bentsen, M., Bi, D., Biastoch, A., Böning, C., Bozec, A., Canuto, V. M.,
Chassignet, E., Danabasoglu, G., Danilov, S., Diansky, N., Drange, H.,
Fogli, P. G., Gusev, A., Hallberg, R. W., Howard, A., Ilicak, M., Jung, T.,
Kelley, M., Large, W. G., Leboissetier, A., Long, M., Lu, J., Masina, S.,
Mishra, A., Navarra, A., George Nurser, A. J., Patara, L., Samuels, B. L.,
Sidorenko, D., Tsujino, H., Uotila, P., Wang, Q., and Yeager, S. G.: An
assessment of Antarctic Circumpolar Current and Southern Ocean meridional
overturning circulation during 1958–2007 in a suite of interannual CORE-II
simulations, Ocean Model., 93, 84–120, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.07.009,
2015.
Ferreira, D., Marshall, J., and Heimbach, P.: Estimating eddy
stresses by fitting dynamics to observations using a residual-mean ocean circulation model and its adjoint, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 35, 1891–1910,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO2785.1, 2005.
Fetterer, F., Knowles, K., Meier, W., Savoie, M., and Windnagel, A. K.: Sea
Ice Index, Version 3, Boulder, CO, USA, 2017.
Firing, Y. L., Chereskin,
T. K., and Mazloff, M. R.: Vertical structure and transport of the Antarctic
Circumpolar Current in Drake Passage from direct velocity observations, J.
Geophys. Res., 116, C08015, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JC006999, 2011.
Fox-Kemper, B., Danabasoglu, G., Ferrari, R., Griffies, S. M., Hallberg, R.
W., Holland, M. M., Maltrud, M. E., Peacock, S., and Samuels, B. L.:
Parameterization of mixed layer eddies. III: Implementation and impact in
global ocean climate simulations, Ocean Model., 39, 61–78,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2010.09.002, 2011.
Fox-Kemper, B., Adcroft, A., Böning, C. W., Chassignet, E. P.,
Curchitser, E., Danabasoglu, G., Eden, C., England, M. H., Gerdes, R.,
Greatbatch, R. J., Griffies, S. M., Hallberg, R. W., Hanert, E., Heimbach,
P., Hewitt, H. T., Hill, C. N., Komuro, Y., Legg, S., Sommer, J. Le, Masina,
S., Marsland, S. J., Penny, S. G., Qiao, F., Ringler, T. D., Treguier, A.
M., Tsujino, H., Uotila, P., and Yeager, S. G.: Challenges and prospects in
ocean circulation models, Front. Mar. Sci., 6, 65,
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00065, 2019.
Fox-Kemper, B., Ferrari, R., and Hallberg, R.: Parameterization of mixed
layer eddies. Part I: Theory and diagnosis, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 38,
1145–1165, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JPO3792.1, 2008.
Garzoli, S. L., Baringer, M. O., Dong, S., Perez, R. C., and Yao, Q.: South Atlantic meridional fluxes, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 71, 21–32, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2012.09.003, 2013.
Gent, P. R. and Danabasoglu, G.: Response to increasing southern hemisphere
winds in CCSM4, J. Climate, 24, 4992–4998, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-10-05011.1,
2011.
Gent, P. R. and Mcwilliams, J. C.: Isopycnal mixing in ocean
circulation models, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 20, 150–155,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1990)020<0150:imiocm>2.0.co;2,
1990.
Godfrey, J. S.: A Sverdrup model of the depth-integrated flow for the world
ocean allowing for island circulations, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn.,
45, 89–112, https://doi.org/10.1080/03091928908208894, 1989.
Goes, M., Goni, G., and Dong, S.: An optimal XBT-based monitoring system for
the South Atlantic meridional overturning circulation at 34∘ S, J.
Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 120, 161–181, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010202, 2015.
Good, S. A., Martin, M. J., and Rayner, N. A.: EN4: Quality controlled ocean
temperature and salinity profiles and monthly objective analyses with
uncertainty estimates, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 118, 6704–6716,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JC009067, 2013.
Gordon, A. L., Sprintall, J., Van Aken, H. M., Susanto, R. D., Wijffels, S.,
Molcard, R., Ffield, A., Pranowo, W., and Wirasantosa, S.: The Indonesian
throughflow during 2004–2006 as observed by the INSTANT program, Dyn. Atmos.
Ocean., 50, 115–128, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2009.12.002, 2010.
Gordon, A. L.: Oceanography of the Indonesian seas and their throughflow,
Oceanography, 18, 15–27, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2005.01,
2005.
Gordon, A. L.: Interocean exchange of thermocline water, J. Geophys.
Res., 91, 5037, https://doi.org/10.1029/jc091ic04p05037, 1986.
Gregory, J. M., Griffies, S. M., Hughes, C. W., Lowe, J. A., Church, J. A.,
Fukimori, I., Gomez, N., Kopp, R. E., Landerer, F., Cozannet, G. Le, Ponte,
R. M., Stammer, D., Tamisiea, M. E., and van de Wal, R. S. W.: Concepts and terminology for sea level:
Mean, variability and change, both local and global, Surv. Geophys., 40, 1251–1289, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-019-09525-z,
2019.
Griffies, S. M.: The Gent–McWilliams Skew Flux, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 28,
831–841, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028<0831:TGMSF>2.0.CO;2, 1998.
Griffies, S. M., Biastoch, A., Böning, C., Bryan, F., Danabasoglu, G.,
Chassignet, E. P., England, M. H., Gerdes, R., Haak, H., Hallberg, R. W.,
Hazeleger, W., Jungclaus, J., Large, W. G., Madec, G., Pirani, A., Samuels,
B. L., Scheinert, M., Gupta, A. Sen, Severijns, C. A., Simmons, H. L.,
Treguier, A. M., Winton, M., Yeager, S., and Yin, J.: Coordinated Ocean-ice
Reference Experiments (COREs), Ocean Model., 26, 1–46,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2008.08.007, 2009.
Griffies, S. M., Yin, J., Durack, P. J., Goddard, P., Bates, S. C., Behrens,
E., Bentsen, M., Bi, D., Biastoch, A., Böning, C. W., Bozec, A.,
Chassignet, E., Danabasoglu, G., Danilov, S., Domingues, C. M., Drange, H.,
Farneti, R., Fernandez, E., Greatbatch, R. J., Holland, D. M., Ilicak, M.,
Large, W. G., Lorbacher, K., Lu, J., Marsland, S. J., Mishra, A., George
Nurser, A. J., Salas y Mélia, D., Palter, J. B., Samuels, B. L.,
Schröter, J., Schwarzkopf, F. U., Sidorenko, D., Treguier, A. M., Tseng,
Y. heng, Tsujino, H., Uotila, P., Valcke, S., Voldoire, A., Wang, Q.,
Winton, M., and Zhang, X.: An assessment of global and regional sea level for
years 1993–2007 in a suite of interannual CORE-II simulations, Ocean Model.,
78, 35–89, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2014.03.004, 2014.
Griffies, S. M., Winton, M., Anderson, W. G., Benson, R., Delworth, T. L.,
Dufour, C. O., Dunne, J. P., Goddard, P., Morrison, A. K., Rosati, A.,
Wittenberg, A. T., Yin, J. J., and Zhang, R.: Impacts on ocean heat from transient mesoscale eddies in a hierarchy of climate models, J. Climate, 28,
952–977, 2015.
Griffies, S. M., Danabasoglu, G., Durack, P. J., Adcroft, A. J., Balaji, V., Böning, C. W., Chassignet, E. P., Curchitser, E., Deshayes, J., Drange, H., Fox-Kemper, B., Gleckler, P. J., Gregory, J. M., Haak, H., Hallberg, R. W., Heimbach, P., Hewitt, H. T., Holland, D. M., Ilyina, T., Jungclaus, J. H., Komuro, Y., Krasting, J. P., Large, W. G., Marsland, S. J., Masina, S., McDougall, T. J., Nurser, A. J. G., Orr, J. C., Pirani, A., Qiao, F., Stouffer, R. J., Taylor, K. E., Treguier, A. M., Tsujino, H., Uotila, P., Valdivieso, M., Wang, Q., Winton, M., and Yeager, S. G.: OMIP contribution to CMIP6: experimental and diagnostic protocol for the physical component of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 3231–3296, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3231-2016, 2016.
Haarsma, R. J., Roberts, M. J., Vidale, P. L., Senior, C. A., Bellucci, A., Bao, Q., Chang, P., Corti, S., Fučkar, N. S., Guemas, V., von Hardenberg, J., Hazeleger, W., Kodama, C., Koenigk, T., Leung, L. R., Lu, J., Luo, J.-J., Mao, J., Mizielinski, M. S., Mizuta, R., Nobre, P., Satoh, M., Scoccimarro, E., Semmler, T., Small, J., and von Storch, J.-S.: High Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP v1.0) for CMIP6, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 4185–4208, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-4185-2016, 2016.
Häkkinen, S. and Rhines, P. B.: Decline of Subpolar North Atlantic
Circulation during the 1990s, Science, 304, 555–559,
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1094917, 2004.
Hallberg, R.: Using a resolution function to regulate parameterizations of
oceanic mesoscale eddy effects, Ocean Model., 72, 92–103,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2013.08.007, 2013.
Hallberg, R. and Gnanadesikan, A.: The role of Eddies in determining the
structure and response of the wind-driven Southern hemisphere overturning:
Results from the Modeling Eddies in the Southern Ocean (MESO) project, J.
Phys. Oceanogr., 36, 2232–2252, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO2980.1, 2006.
Halliwell, G. R.: Evaluation of vertical coordinate and vertical mixing
algorithms in the HYbrid-Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM), Ocean Model.,
7, 285–322, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2003.10.002, 2004.
Hirschi, J. J.-M., Barnier, B., Böning, C., Biastoch, A., Blaker, A. T.,
Coward, A., Danilov, S., Drijfhout, S., Getzlaff, K., Griffies, S. M.,
Hasumi, H., Hewitt, H., Iovino, D., Kawasaki, T., Kiss, A. E., Koldunov, N.,
Marzocchi, A., Moat, B., Molines, J.-M., Myers, P. G., Penduff, T., Roberts,
M., Treguier, A.-M., Sein, D. V., Sidorenko, D., Small1, J., Spence, P.,
Thompson, L., Weijer, W., and Xu, X.: The Atlantic meridional overturning
circulation in high resolution models, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 125, e2019JC015522, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015522, 2020.
Horvat, C. and Tziperman, E.: A prognostic model of the sea-ice floe size and thickness distribution, The Cryosphere, 9, 2119–2134, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-2119-2015, 2015.
Horvat, C., Blanchard-Wrigglesworth, E., and Petty, A.: Observing waves in
sea ice with ICESat-2, Geophys, Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL087629, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL087629, 2020.
Hunke, E. C. and Dukowicz, J. K.: An elastic-viscous-plastic model for sea
ice dynamics, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 27, 1849–1867,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1997)027<1849:AEVPMF>2.0.CO;2,
1997.
Hunke, E. C. and Lipscomb, W. H.: CICE: the Los Alamos sea ice model, documentation and software user's manual, Version 4.1. Los Alamos, NM, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Tech. Rep. LA-CC-06-012, 2010.
Hunke, E. C., Lipscomb, W. H., Turner, A. K., Jeffery, N., and Elliott, S.:
CICE: the Los Alamos Sea Ice Model Documentation and Software User's Manual
Version 4.1 LA-CC-06-012, 2010.
Hunke, E. C., Hebert, D. A., and Lecomte, O.: Level-ice melt ponds in the Los
Alamos sea ice model, CICE, Ocean Model., 71, 26–42,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2012.11.008, 2013.
Hunke, E. C., Lipscomb, W. H., Turner, A. K., Jeffery, N., and Elliott, S.:
CICE: the Los Alamos Sea Ice Model documentation and software user's manual,
Version 5.1, LA-CC-06-012, T-3 Fluid Dyn. Group, Los Alamos Natl. Lab., 116,
2015.
Ilicak, M., Drange, H., Wang, Q., Gerdes, R., Aksenov, Y., Bailey, D.,
Bentsen, M., Biastoch, A., Bozec, A., Böning, C., Cassou, C.,
Chassignet, E., Coward, A. C., Curry, B., Danabasoglu, G., Danilov, S.,
Fernandez, E., Fogli, P. G., Fujii, Y., Griffies, S. M., Iovino, D., Jahn,
A., Jung, T., Large, W. G., Lee, C., Lique, C., Lu, J., Masina, S., George
Nurser, A. J., Roth, C., Salas y Mélia, D., Samuels, B. L., Spence, P.,
Tsujino, H., Valcke, S., Voldoire, A., Wang, X., and Yeager, S. G.: An
assessment of the Arctic Ocean in a suite of interannual CORE-II
simulations. Part III: Hydrography and fluxes, Ocean Model., 100, 141–161,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2016.02.004, 2016.
Jayne, S. R.: The Impact of Abyssal Mixing Parameterizations in an Ocean
General Circulation Model, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 39, 1756–1775,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JPO4085.1, 2009.
Jochum, M., Fox-Kemper, B., Molnar, P. H., and Shields, C.: Differences in
the Indonesian seaway in a coupled climate model and their relevance to
Pliocene climate and El Niño, Paleoceanography, 24, PA1212,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2008PA001678, 2009.
Johns, W. E., Baringer, M. O., Beal, L. M., Cunningham, S. A., Kanzow, T.,
Bryden, H. L., Hirschi, J. J. M., Marotzke, J., Meinen, C. S., Shaw, B., and
Curry, R.: Continuous, Array-Based Estimates of Atlantic Ocean Heat
Transport at 26.5∘ N, J. Climate, 24, 2429–2449,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3997.1, 2011.
Kobayashi, S., Ota, Y., Harada, Y., Ebita, A., Moriya, M., Onoda, H., Onogi,
K., Kamahori, H., Kobayashi, C., Endo, H., Miyaoka, K., and Kiyotoshi, T.:
The JRA-55 reanalysis: General specifications and basic characteristics, J.
Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 93, 5–48, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2015-001, 2015.
Koenig, Z., Provost, C., Ferrari, R., Sennéchael, N., and Rio, M.-H.:
Volume transport of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current: Production and
validation of a 20 year long time series obtained from in situ and satellite
observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 119, 5407–5433,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014jc009966, 2014.
Kohout, A., Williams, M., Dean, S., and Meylan, M. H.: Storm-induced sea-ice
breakup and the implications for ice extent, Nature, 509, 604–607,
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13262, 2014.
Kurian, J., P., Li, P., Chang, P., Patricola, C. M., and Small, J.: Impact of
the Benguela coastal low-level jet on the Southeast Tropical Atlantic SST
bias in a regional ocean model, Clim. Dynam., in review, 2020.
Kurtz, N. T. and Markus, T.: Satellite observations of Antarctic sea ice thickness and volume, J. Geophys. Res., 117, C08025, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JC008141, 2012.
Large, W. G. and Yeager, S. G.: Diurnal to decadal global forcing for ocean
and sea–ice models: The data sets and flux climatologies, NCAR Tech. Note,
TN–460+ST(May), 105 pp., https://doi.org/10.5065/D6KK98Q6, 2004.
Large, W. G., McWilliams, J. C., and Doney, S. C.: Oceanic vertical mixing: A
review and a model with a nonlocal boundary layer parameterization, Rev.
Geophys., 32, 363–403, https://doi.org/10.1029/94RG01872, 1994.
Large, W. G. and Yeager, S. G.: The global climatology of an interannually
varying air – Sea flux data set, Clim. Dynam., 33, 341–364,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-008-0441-3, 2009.
Large, W. G., Danabasoglu, G., Doney, S. C., and McWilliams, J. C.:
Sensitivity to surface forcing and boundary layer mixing
in a global ocean model: Annual-mean climatology, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 27, 2418–2447,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1997)027<2418:STSFAB>2.0.CO;2,
1997.
Li, L., Lin, P., Yu, Y., Wang, B., Zhou, T., Liu, L., Liu, J., Bao, Q., Xu,
S., Huang, W., Xia, K., Pu, Y., Dong, L., Shen, S., Liu, Y., Hu, N., Liu,
M., Sun, W., Shi, X., Zheng, W., Wu, B., Song, M., Liu, H., Zhang, X., Wu,
G., Xue, W., Huang, X., Yang, G., Song, Z., and Qiao, F.: The flexible global
ocean-atmosphere-land system model, Grid-point Version 2: FGOALS-g2, Adv.
Atmos. Sci., 30, 543–560, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-012-2140-6, 2013.
Li, Q., Webb, A., Fox-Kemper, B., Craig, A., Danabasoglu, G., Large, W. G.,
and Vertenstein, M.: Langmuir mixing effects on global climate: WAVEWATCH
III in CESM, Ocean Model., 103, 145–160, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.07.020,
2016.
Li, Y, Liu, H., Ding, M., Lin, P., Yu, Z., Yu, Y., Meng, Y., Li, Y., Jian,
X., Jiang, J., Chen, K., Yang, Q., Wang, Y., Zhao, B., Wei, J., Ma, J.,
Zheng, W., and Wang, P.: Eddy-resolving simulation of CAS-LICOM3 for the
Ocean Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (OMIP-2), Adv. Atmos. Sci., 37, 1067–1080,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-020-0057-z, 2020.
Lin, P., Liu, H., Xue, W., Li, H., Jiang, J., Song, M., Song, Y., Wang,
F., and Zhang, M.: A coupled experiment with LICOM2 as the ocean component of
CESM1, J. Meteorol. Res., 30, 76–92, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-015-5045-3,
2016.
Lin, P. F., Yu, Z., Liu, H., Yu, Y., Li, Y,Jiang, J., Xue, W., Chen, K., Yang, Q., Zhao, B., Wei, J., Ding, M., Sun, Z., Wang, Y., Meng, Y., Zheng, W., and Ma, J: LICOM model datasets for the CMIP6 Ocean model intercomparison project, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 37, 239-−249, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-019-9208-5, 2020.
Liu, H. L., Zhang, X. H., Li, W., Yu, Y. Q., and Yu, R. C.: An eddy-permitting
oceanic general circulation model and its preliminary evaluation, Adv.
Atmos. Sci., 21, 675–690, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02916365, 2004.
Liu, H., Lin, P., Yu, Y., and Zhang, X.: The baseline evaluation of LASG/IAP
Climate system Ocean Model (LICOM) version 2, Acta Meteorol. Sin., 26,
318–329, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-012-0305-y, 2012.
Locarnini, R. A., Mishonov, A. V., Antonov, J. I., Boyer, T. P., Garcia, H.
E., Baranova, O. K., Zweng, M. M., Paver, C. R., Reagan, J. R., Johnson, D.
R., Hamilton, M., Seidov, D., and Levitus, S.: World Ocean Atlas 2013, Volume
1, Temperature, https://doi.org/10.7289/V55X26VD, 2013.
Lumpkin, R. and Speer, K.: Global Ocean Meridional Overturning, J. Phys.
Oceanogr., 37, 2550–2562, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO3130.1, 2007.
Ma, X., Jing, Z., Chang, P., Liu, X., Montuoro, R., Small, R. J., Bryan, F.
O., Greatbatch, R. J., Brandt, P., Wu, D., Lin, X., and Wu, L.: Western
boundary currents regulated by interaction between ocean eddies and the
atmosphere, Nature, 535, 533–537, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18640, 2016.
Maltrud, M. E. and McClean, J. L.: An eddy resolving global 1/10∘
ocean simulation, Ocean Model., 8, 31–54,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2003.12.001, 2005.
McClean, J. L., Bader, D. C., Bryan, F. O., Maltrud, M. E., Dennis, J. M.,
Mirin, A. A., Jones, P. W., Kim, Y. Y., Ivanova, D. P., Vertenstein, M.,
Boyle, J. S., Jacob, R. L., Norton, N., Craig, A., and Worley, P. H.: A
prototype two-decade fully-coupled fine-resolution CCSM simulation, Ocean
Model., 39, 10–30, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2011.02.011, 2011.
Meinen, C. S., Speich, S., Perez, R. C., Dong, S., Piola, A. R., Garzoli, S.
L., Baringer, M. O., Gladyshev, S., and Campos, E. J. D.: Temporal
variability of the meridional overturning circulation at 34.5∘ S:
Results from two pilot boundary arrays in the South Atlantic, J. Geophys.
Res.-Oceans, 118, 6461–6478, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JC009228, 2013.
Meinen, C. S., Speich, S., Piola, A. R., Ansorge, I., Campos, E.,
Kersalé, M., Terre, T., Chidichimo, M. P., Lamont, T., Sato, O. T.,
Perez, R. C., Valla, D., van den Berg, M., Le Hénaff, M., Dong, S., and
Garzoli, S. L.: Meridional overturning circulation transport variability at 34.5∘S during 2009–2017: Baroclinic and barotropic flows and the dueling influence of the boundaries, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 4180–4188,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL077408, 2018.
Mesinger, F. and Janjic, Z. I.: Problems and numerical methods of the
incorporation of mountains in atmospheric models, Lect. Appl. Math., 22,
81–120, 1985.
Meyers, G.: Variation of Indonesian throughflow and the El Niño-Southern
Oscillation, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 101,, 12255–12263,
https://doi.org/10.1029/95JC03729@10.1002/(ISSN)2169-9291.PACLLWBC1, 1996.
Msadek, R., Johns, W. E., Yeager, S. G., Danabasoglu, G., Delworth, T. L.,
and Rosati, A.: The Atlantic Meridional Heat Transport at 26.5∘ N
and Its Relationship with the MOC in the RAPID Array and the GFDL and NCAR
Coupled Models, J. Climate, 26, 4335–4356, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00081.1,
2013.
Murray, R. J.: Explicit generation of
orthogonal grids for ocean models, J. Comput. Phys., 126, 251–273,
https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1996.0136, 1996.
Notz, D., Dörr, J., Bailey, D. A., Blockley, E., Bushuk, M., Debernard,
J. B., Dekker, E., DeRepentigny, P., Docquier, D., Fuckar, N. S., Fyfe, J.
C., Jahn, A., Holland, M., Hunke, E., Iovino, D., Khosravi, N., Massonnet,
F., Madec, G., O'Farrell, S., Petty, A., Rana, A., Roach, L., Rosenblum, E.,
Rousset, C., Semmler, T., Stroeve, J., Tremblay, B., Toyoda, T., Tsujino, H.
and Vancoppenolle, M.: Arctic sea ice in CMIP6, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47,
e2019GL086749, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086749, 2020.
Ollitrault, M. and Colin de Verdière, A.: The ocean general circulation
near 1000 m depth, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 44, 384–408,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-13-030.1, 2014.
Olonscheck, D., Mauritsen, T., and Notz, D.: Arctic sea-ice variability is
primarily driven by atmospheric temperature fluctuations, Nat. Geosci.,
12, 430–434, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0363-1, 2019.
Parkinson, C. L. and Washington, W. M.: Large-scale numerical model of sea
ice, J Geophys Res, 84, 311–337, https://doi.org/10.1029/jc084ic01p00311, 1979.
Pearson, B., Fox-Kemper, B., Bachman, S., and Bryan, F.: Evaluation of
scale-aware subgrid mesoscale eddy models in a global eddy-rich model, Ocean
Model., 115, 42–58, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2017.05.007, 2017.
Rackow, T., Goessling, H. F., Jung, T., Sidorenko, D., Semmler, T., Barbi,
D., and Handorf, D.: Towards multi-resolution global climate modeling with
ECHAM6-FESOM. Part II: climate variability, Clim. Dyn., 50,
2369–2394, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3192-6, 2018.
Rackow, T., Sein, D. V., Semmler, T., Danilov, S., Koldunov, N. V., Sidorenko, D., Wang, Q., and Jung, T.: Sensitivity of deep ocean biases to horizontal resolution in prototype CMIP6 simulations with AWI-CM1.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2635–2656, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2635-2019, 2019.
Rahaman, H., Srinivasu, U., Panickal, S., Durgadoo, J. V., Griffies, S. M.,
Ravichandran, M., Bozec, A., Cherchi, A., Voldoire, A., Sidorenko, D.,
Chassignet, E. P., Danabasoglu, G., Tsujino, H., Getzlaff, K., Ilicak, M.,
Bentsen, M., Long, M. C., Fogli, P. G., Farneti, R., Danilov, S., Marsland,
S. J., Valcke, S., Yeager, S. G., and Wang, Q.: An assessment of the Indian
Ocean mean state and seasonal cycle in a suite of interannual CORE-II
simulations, Ocean Model., 145, 101503, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2019.101503, 2020.
Redi, M. H.: Oceanic isopycnal mixing by coordinate rotation, J. Phys.
Oceanogr., 12, 1154–1158, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1982)012<1154:OIMBCR>2.0.CO;2, 1982.
Renault, L., McWilliams, J. C., and Penven, P.: Modulation of the Agulhas
Current retroflection and leakage by oceanic current interaction with the
atmosphere in coupled simulations, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 47, 2077–2100,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-16-0168.1, 2017.
Reynolds, R. W., Smith, T. M., Liu, C., Chelton, D. B., Casey, K. S., and
Schlax, M. G.: Daily high-resolution-blended analyses for sea surface
temperature, J. Climate, 20, 5473–5496, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI1824.1, 2007.
Richardson, P. L.: A census of eddies observed in North Atlantic SOFAR float
data, Prog. Oceanogr., 31, 1–50, https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6611(93)90022-6, 1993.
Roach, L. A., Horvat, C., Dean, S. M., and Bitz, C. M.: An emergent sea ice
floe size distribution in a global coupled ocean-sea ice model, J.
Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 123, 4322–4337, https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JC013692,
2018.
Roach, L. A., Dörr, J., Holmes, C. R., Massonnet, F., Blockley, E. W.,
Notz, D., Rackow, T., Raphael, M. N., O'Farrell, S. P., Bailey, D. A., and
Bitz, C. M.: Antarctic sea ice area in CMIP6, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47,
e2019GL086729, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086729, 2020.
Rossby, T.: The North Atlantic Current and surrounding waters: At the
crossroads, Rev. Geophys., 34, 463–481, https://doi.org/10.1029/96RG02214,
1996.
Schmitz Jr., W. J.: On the World Ocean Circulation, vol. 1, Some Global
Features/North Atlantic Circulation, 1996.
Scott, R. B., Arbic, B. K., Chassignet, E. P., Coward, A. C., Maltrud, M.,
Merryfield, W. J., Srinivasan, A., and Varghese, A.: Total kinetic energy in
four global eddying ocean circulation models and over 5000 current meter
records, Ocean Model., 32, 157–169, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2010.01.005,
2010.
Sein, D. V., Danilov, S., Biastoch, A., Durgadoo, J. V., Sidorenko, D.,
Harig, S., and Wang, Q.: Designing variable ocean model resolution based on
the observed ocean variability, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 8, 904–916,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016MS000650, 2016.
Sein, D. V., Koldunov, N. V., Danilov, S., Sidorenko, D., Wekerle, C.,
Cabos, W., Rackow, T., Scholz, P., Semmler, T., Wang, Q., and Jung, T.: The relative influence of atmospheric and oceanic
model resolution on the circulation of the North Atlantic Ocean
in a coupled climate model, J. Adv.
Model. Earth Syst., 10, 2026–2041, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001327, 2018.
Semtner, A. J.: A model for the thermodynamic growth of sea ice in numerical
investigations of climate, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 6, 379–389,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1976)006<0379:amfttg>2.0.co;2,
1976.
Sidorenko, D., Koldunov, N. V., Wang, Q., Danilov, S., Goessling, H. F.,
Gurses, O., Scholz, P., Sein, D. V., Volodin, E., Wekerle, C., and Jung, T.:
Influence of a salt plume parameterization in a coupled climate model, J.
Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 10, 2357–2373, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001291, 2018.
Sidorenko, D., Rackow, T., Jung, T., Semmler, T., Barbi, D., Danilov, S.,
Dethloff, K., Dorn, W., Fieg, K., Goessling, H. F., Handorf, D., Harig, S.,
Hiller, W., Juricke, S., Losch, M., Schröter, J., Sein, D. V., and Wang,
Q.: Towards multi-resolution global climate modeling with ECHAM6–FESOM.
Part I: model formulation and mean climate, Clim. Dynam., 44, 757–780,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2290-6, 2015.
Smagorinsky, J.: General circulation experiments with the primitive
equations, Mon. Weather Rev., 91, 99–164,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1963)091<0099:gcewtp>2.3.co;2,
1963.
Small, R. J., Bacmeister, J., Bailey, D., Baker, A., Bishop, S., Bryan,
F., Caron, J., Dennis, J., Gent, P., Hsu, H., Jochum, M., Lawrence, D.,
Muñoz, E., DiNezio, P., Scheitlin, T., Tomas, R., Tribbia, J., Tseng, Y.,
and Vertenstein, M.: A new synoptic scale resolving global climate
simulation using the Community Earth System Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth
Sy., 6, 1065–1094, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014MS000363, 2014.
Small, R. J., Curchitser, E., Hedstrom, K., Kauffman, B., and Large, W. G.:
The Benguela upwelling system: Quantifying the sensitivity to resolution and
coastal wind representation in a global climate model, J. Climate, 28,
9409–9432, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0192.1, 2015.
Smeed, D. A., Josey, S. A., Beaulieu, C., Johns, W. E., Moat, B. I.,
Frajka-Williams, E., Rayner, D., Meinen, C. S., Baringer, M. O., Bryden, H.
L., and McCarthy, G. D.: The North Atlantic Ocean is in a state of reduced
overturning, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 1527–1533,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076350, 2018.
Smith, R., Jones, P., Briegleb, B., Bryan, F., Danabasoglu, G., Dennis, J., Dukowicz, J., Eden, C., Fox-Kemper, B., Gent, P., Hecht, M., Jayne, S., Jochum, K. L. M., Large, W., Maltrud, M., Norton, N., Peacock, S., Vertenstein, M., and Yeager, S.: The parallel
ocean program (POP) reference manual: ocean component of the community
climate system model (CCSM) and community earth system model (CESM), Rep.
LAUR-01853, 141, 1–140, 2010.
Sprintall, J., Wijffels, S. E., Molcard, R., and Jaya, I.: Direct estimates
of the Indonesian Throughflow entering the Indian Ocean: 2004–2006, J.
Geophys. Res., 114, C07001, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JC005257, 2009.
St. Laurent, L. C., Simmons, H. L., and Jayne, S. R.: Estimating tidally
driven mixing in the deep ocean, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 2106,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2002gl015633, 2002.
Steele, M., Morley, R., and Ermold, W.: PHC: A Global Ocean Hydrography with
a High-Quality Arctic Ocean, J. Climate, 14, 2079–2087,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<2079:PAGOHW>2.0.CO;2,
2001.
Stewart, K. D., Hogg, A. McC., Griffies, S. M., Heerdegen, A. P., Ward, M.
L., Spence, P., and England, M. H.: Vertical resolution of baroclinic modes
in global ocean models, Ocean Model., 113, 50–65,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2017.03.012, 2017
Stroeve, J. and Meier, W. N.: Sea ice trends and climatologies from SMMR and SSM/I-SSMIS, Version 2, Boulder, Colorado USA, NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center, https://doi.org/10.5067/EYICLBOAAJOU, 2017.
Stroeve, J. C., Kattsov, V., Barrett, A., Serreze, M., Pavlova, T., Holland,
M., and Meier, W. N.: Trends in Arctic sea ice extent from CMIP5, CMIP3 and
observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L16502, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052676,
2012.
Sun, Q., Whitney, M. M., Bryan, F. O., and Tseng, Y.: Assessing the skill of
the improved treatment of riverine freshwater in the Community Earth System
Model (CESM) relative to a new salinity climatology, J. Adv. Model. Earth
Sy., 11, 1189–1206, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001349, 2019.
Suzuki, T., Yamazaki, D., Tsujino, H., Komuro, Y., Nakano, H., and Urakawa,
S.: A dataset of continental river discharge based on JRA-55 for use in a
global ocean circulation model, J. Oceanogr., 74, 421–429,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10872-017-0458-5, 2018.
Talley, L.: Closure of the global overturning circulation through the Indian, Pacific, and Southern Oceans:
Schematics and transports, 26, 80–97, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2013.07, 2013.
Teague, W. J., Carron, M. J., and Hogan, P. J.: A comparison between the
Generalized Digital Environmental Model and Levitus climatologies, J.
Geophys. Res., 95, 7167–7183, https://doi.org/10.1029/jc095ic05p07167, 1990.
Thoppil, P. G., Richman, J. G., and Hogan, P. J.: Energetics of a global
ocean circulation model compared to observations, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
38, L15607, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048347, 2011.
Trenberth, K. E., Zhang, Y., Fasullo, J. T., and Cheng, L.: Observation-based
estimates of global and basin ocean meridional heat transport time series,
J. Climate, 32, 4567–4583, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0872.1, 2019.
Tseng, Y., Lin, H., Chen, H. ching, Thompson, K., Bentsen, M., Böning,
C. W., Bozec, A., Cassou, C., Chassignet, E., Chow, C. H., Danabasoglu, G.,
Danilov, S., Farneti, R., Fogli, P. G., Fujii, Y., Griffies, S. M., Ilicak,
M., Jung, T., Masina, S., Navarra, A., Patara, L., Samuels, B. L.,
Scheinert, M., Sidorenko, D., Sui, C. H., Tsujino, H., Valcke, S., Voldoire,
A., Wang, Q., and Yeager, S. G.: North and equatorial Pacific Ocean
circulation in the CORE-II hindcast simulations, Ocean Model., 104,
143–170, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2016.06.003, 2016.
Tsujino, H., Urakawa, L. S., Griffies, S. M., Danabasoglu, G., Adcroft, A. J., Amaral, A. E., Arsouze, T., Bentsen, M., Bernardello, R., Böning, C. W., Bozec, A., Chassignet, E. P., Danilov, S., Dussin, R., Exarchou, E., Fogli, P. G., Fox-Kemper, B., Guo, C., Ilicak, M., Iovino, D., Kim, W. M., Koldunov, N., Lapin, V., Li, Y., Lin, P., Lindsay, K., Liu, H., Long, M. C., Komuro, Y., Marsland, S. J., Masina, S., Nummelin, A., Rieck, J. K., Ruprich-Robert, Y., Scheinert, M., Sicardi, V., Sidorenko, D., Suzuki, T., Tatebe, H., Wang, Q., Yeager, S. G., and Yu, Z.: Evaluation of global ocean–sea-ice model simulations based on the experimental protocols of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (OMIP-2), Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3643–3708, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3643-2020, 2020.
Tsujino, H., Urakawa, S., Nakano, H., Small, R. J., Kim, W. M., Yeager, S.
G., Danabasoglu, G., Suzuki, T., Bamber, J. L., Bentsen, M., Böning, C.
W., Bozec, A., Chassignet, E. P., Curchitser, E., Boeira Dias, F., Durack,
P. J., Griffies, S. M., Harada, Y., Ilicak, M., Josey, S. A., Kobayashi, C.,
Kobayashi, S., Komuro, Y., Large, W. G., Le Sommer, J., Marsland, S. J.,
Masina, S., Scheinert, M., Tomita, H., Valdivieso, M., and Yamazaki, D.:
JRA-55 based surface dataset for driving ocean–sea-ice models (JRA55-do),
Ocean Model., 130, 79–139, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2018.07.002, 2018.
Turner, A. K. and Hunke, E. C.: Impacts of a mushy-layer thermodynamic
approach in global sea-ice simulations using the CICE sea-ice model, J.
Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 120, 1253–1275, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010358, 2015.
von Storch, J.-S., Haak, H., Hertwig, E., and Fast, I.: Vertical heat and
salt fluxes due to resolved and parameterised meso-scale eddies, Ocean
Model., 108, 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2016.10.001, 2016.
Wang, Q., Danilov, S., and Schröter, J.: Finite element ocean circulation
model based on triangular prismatic elements, with application in studying
the effect of topography representation, J. Geophys. Res., 113, C05015,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004482, 2008.
Wang, Q., Danilov, S., Sidorenko, D., Timmermann, R., Wekerle, C., Wang, X., Jung, T., and Schröter, J.: The Finite Element Sea Ice-Ocean Model (FESOM) v.1.4: formulation of an ocean general circulation model, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 663–693, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-663-2014, 2014.
Wang, Q., Ilicak, M., Gerdes, R., Drange, H., Aksenov, Y., Bailey, D. A.,
Bentsen, M., Biastoch, A., Bozec, A., Böning, C., Cassou, C.,
Chassignet, E., Coward, A. C., Curry, B., Danabasoglu, G., Danilov, S.,
Fernandez, E., Fogli, P. G., Fujii, Y., Griffies, S. M., Iovino, D., Jahn,
A., Jung, T., Large, W. G., Lee, C., Lique, C., Lu, J., Masina, S., Nurser,
A. J. G., Rabe, B., Roth, C., Salas y Mélia, D., Samuels, B. L., Spence,
P., Tsujino, H., Valcke, S., Voldoire, A., Wang, X., and Yeager, S. G.: An
assessment of the Arctic Ocean in a suite of interannual CORE-II
simulations. Part I: Sea ice and solid freshwater, Ocean Model., 99,
110–132, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.12.008, 2016a.
Wang, Q., Ilicak, M., Gerdes, R., Drange, H., Aksenov, Y., Bailey, D. A.,
Bentsen, M., Biastoch, A., Bozec, A., Böning, C., Cassou, C.,
Chassignet, E., Coward, A. C., Curry, B., Danabasoglu, G., Danilov, S.,
Fernandez, E., Fogli, P. G., Fujii, Y., Griffies, S. M., Iovino, D., Jahn,
A., Jung, T., Large, W. G., Lee, C., Lique, C., Lu, J., Masina, S., Nurser,
A. J. G., Rabe, B., Roth, C., Salas y Mélia, D., Samuels, B. L., Spence,
P., Tsujino, H., Valcke, S., Voldoire, A., Wang, X., and Yeager, S. G.: An
assessment of the Arctic Ocean in a suite of interannual CORE-II
simulations. Part II: Liquid freshwater, Ocean Model., 99, 86–109,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.12.009, 2016b.
Wang, Q., Danilov, S., Jung, T., Kaleschke, L., and Wernecke, A.: Sea ice
leads in the Arctic Ocean: Model assessment, interannual variability and
trends, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 7019–7027, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068696,
2016c.
Whitworth, T.: Monitoring the transport of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current
at Drake Passage, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 13, 2045–2057,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1983)013<2045:mttota>2.0.co;2,
1983.
Whitworth, T. and Peterson, R. G.: Volume transport of the Antarctic
Circumpolar Current from Bottom pressure measurements, J. Phys. Oceanogr.,
15, 810–816, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1985)015<0810:vtotac>2.0.co;2, 1985.
Xu, X., Rhines, P. B., and Chassignet, E. P.: Temperature-salinity structure of the North Atlantic circulation and associated heat and freshwater transports, J. Climate, 29, 7723–7741, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0798.1, 2016.
Xu, X., Chassignet, E. P., Dong, S., and Baringer, M. O.: Transport structure
of the South Atlantic Ocean derived from a high-resolution numerical model
and observations, J. Geophys. Res., in review, 2020a.
Xu, X., Chassignet, E. P., Firing, Y. L., and Donohue, K.: Antarctic
Circumpolar Current transport through Drake Passage: What can we learn from
comparing high-resolution model results to observations?, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 125, e2020JC016365, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016365, 2020b.
Xu, X., Hurlburt, H. E., Schmitz, W. J., Zantopp, R., Fischer, J., and Hogan,
P. J.: On the currents and transports connected with the atlantic meridional
overturning circulation in the subpolar North Atlantic, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 118, 502–516, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20065, 2013.
Xu, X., Chassignet, E. P., Johns, W. E., Schmitz, W. J., and Metzger, E. J.:
Intraseasonal to interannual variability of the Atlantic meridional
overturning circulation from eddy-resolving simulations and observations, J.
Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 119, 5140–5159, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014jc009994, 2014.
Xu, X., Chassignet, E. P., and Wang, F.: On the variability of the Atlantic
meridional overturning circulation transports in coupled CMIP5 simulations,
Clim. Dynam., 52, 6511–6531, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4529-0, 2019.
Yashayaev, I.: Hydrographic changes in the Labrador Sea, 1960–2005, Prog.
Oceanogr., 73, 242–276, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2007.04.015, 2007.
Yeager, S. G. and Large, W. G.: Late-winter generation of spiciness on subducted isopycnals, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 34, 1528–1547,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2004)034<1528:LGOSOS>2.0.CO;2,
2004.
Yi, D. and Zwally, H. J.: Arctic Sea Ice Freeboard and Thickness, Version 1, Boulder, Colorado USA, NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center, https://doi.org/10.5067/SXJVJ3A2XIZT, last update: 15 April 2014, 2020.
Yu, R. C.: A two-step shape-preserving advection scheme,
Adv. Atmos. Sci., 11, 479-−490, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02658169, 1994.
Yu, Y. Q., Tang, S. L. , Liu, H. L., Lin, P. F., and Li, X. L.: Development and evaluation of the dynamic framework of
an ocean general circulation model with arbitrary orthogonal curvilinear coordinate, Chinese J. Atmos. Sci., 42, 877−-889, https://doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.1805.17284, 2018 (in Chinese with English abstract).
Yu, Z. P., Liu, H. L., and Lin, P. F.: A numerical study of the influence of
tidal mixing on Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC)
Simulation, Chinese J. Atmos. Sci., 41, 1087–1100,
https://doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.1702.16263, 2017 (in Chinese).
Zhang, X. H. and Liang, X. Z.: A numerical world ocean general circulation model, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 6, 44−-61,
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02656917, 1989.
Zweng, M. M., Reagan, J. R., Antonov, J. I., Locarnini, R. A., Mishonov, A. V., Boyer, T. P., Garcia, H. E., Baranova, O. K., Johnson, D. R., Seidov, D., and Biddle, M. M.: World Ocean Atlas 2013, vol. 2, Salinity, edited by: Levitus, and Mishonov, A., NOAA Atlas NESDIS 74, 39 pp., 2013.
Special issue
Short summary
This paper presents global comparisons of fundamental global climate variables from a suite of four pairs of matched low- and high-resolution ocean and sea ice simulations to assess the robustness of climate-relevant improvements in ocean simulations associated with moving from coarse (∼1°) to eddy-resolving (∼0.1°) horizontal resolutions. Despite significant improvements, greatly enhanced horizontal resolution does not deliver unambiguous bias reduction in all regions for all models.
This paper presents global comparisons of fundamental global climate variables from a suite of...
