Articles | Volume 13, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4595-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4595-2020
Model evaluation paper
 | Highlight paper
 | 
29 Sep 2020
Model evaluation paper | Highlight paper |  | 29 Sep 2020

Impact of horizontal resolution on global ocean–sea ice model simulations based on the experimental protocols of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (OMIP-2)

Eric P. Chassignet, Stephen G. Yeager, Baylor Fox-Kemper, Alexandra Bozec, Frederic Castruccio, Gokhan Danabasoglu, Christopher Horvat, Who M. Kim, Nikolay Koldunov, Yiwen Li, Pengfei Lin, Hailong Liu, Dmitry V. Sein, Dmitry Sidorenko, Qiang Wang, and Xiaobiao Xu

Related authors

Convolutional neural networks for sea surface data assimilation in operational ocean models: test case in the Gulf of Mexico
Olmo Zavala-Romero, Alexandra Bozec, Eric P. Chassignet, and Jose R. Miranda
Ocean Sci., 21, 113–132, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-21-113-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/os-21-113-2025, 2025
Short summary
Core Services: An Introduction to Global Ocean Forecasting
Yann Drillet, Matthew Martin, Yasumasa Miyazawa, Mike Bell, Eric Chassignet, and Stefania Ciliberti
State Planet Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-2024-38,https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-2024-38, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for SP
Short summary
Improving Accuracy and providing Uncertainty Estimations: Ensemble Methodologies for Ocean Forecasting
Ibrahim Hoteit, Eric Chassignet, and Mike Bell
State Planet Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-2024-10,https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-2024-10, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for SP
Short summary
Ocean Forecasting at the Regional Scale: Actual Status
Marina Tonani, Eric Chassignet, Mauro Cirano, Yasumasa Miyazawa, and Begoña Pérez Gómez
State Planet Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-2024-30,https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-2024-30, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for SP
Short summary
Impact of increased resolution on Arctic Ocean simulations in Ocean Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (OMIP-2)
Qiang Wang, Qi Shu, Alexandra Bozec, Eric P. Chassignet, Pier Giuseppe Fogli, Baylor Fox-Kemper, Andy McC. Hogg, Doroteaciro Iovino, Andrew E. Kiss, Nikolay Koldunov, Julien Le Sommer, Yiwen Li, Pengfei Lin, Hailong Liu, Igor Polyakov, Patrick Scholz, Dmitry Sidorenko, Shizhu Wang, and Xiaobiao Xu
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 347–379, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-347-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-347-2024, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Oceanography
Sensitivity of the tropical Atlantic to vertical mixing in two ocean models (ICON-O v2.6.6 and FESOM v2.5)
Swantje Bastin, Aleksei Koldunov, Florian Schütte, Oliver Gutjahr, Marta Agnieszka Mrozowska, Tim Fischer, Radomyra Shevchenko, Arjun Kumar, Nikolay Koldunov, Helmuth Haak, Nils Brüggemann, Rebecca Hummels, Mia Sophie Specht, Johann Jungclaus, Sergey Danilov, Marcus Dengler, and Markus Jochum
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1189–1220, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1189-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1189-2025, 2025
Short summary
HIDRA3: a deep-learning model for multipoint ensemble sea level forecasting in the presence of tide gauge sensor failures
Marko Rus, Hrvoje Mihanović, Matjaž Ličer, and Matej Kristan
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 605–620, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-605-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-605-2025, 2025
Short summary
A wave-resolving two-dimensional vertical Lagrangian approach to model microplastic transport in nearshore waters based on TrackMPD 3.0
Isabel Jalón-Rojas, Damien Sous, and Vincent Marieu
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 319–336, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-319-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-319-2025, 2025
Short summary
HOTSSea v1: a NEMO-based physical Hindcast of the Salish Sea (1980–2018) supporting ecosystem model development
Greig Oldford, Tereza Jarníková, Villy Christensen, and Michael Dunphy
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 211–237, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-211-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-211-2025, 2025
Short summary
DalROMS-NWA12 v1.0, a coupled circulation–ice–biogeochemistry modelling system for the northwest Atlantic Ocean: development and validation
Kyoko Ohashi, Arnaud Laurent, Christoph Renkl, Jinyu Sheng, Katja Fennel, and Eric Oliver
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8697–8733, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8697-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8697-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Ajayi, A., Le Sommer, J., Chassignet, E., Molines, J.-M., Xu, X., Albert, A., and Cosme, E.: Spatial and temporal variability of the North Atlantic eddy field from two kilometric-resolution ocean models, J. Geophy. Res.-Oceans, 125, e2019JC015827, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015827, 2020. 
Bamber, J. L., Tedstone, A. J., King, M. D., Howat, I. M., Enderlin, E. M., van den Broeke, M. R., and Noel, B.: Land ice freshwater budget of the Arctic and North Atlantic Oceans: 1. Data, methods, and results, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 123, 1827–1837, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JC013605, 2018. 
Bamber, J., van den Broeke, M., Ettema, J., Lenaerts, J., and Rignot, E.: Recent large increases in freshwater fluxes from Greenland into the North Atlantic, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L19501, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052552, 2012. 
Banzon, V. F., Reynolds, R. W., Stokes, D., and Xue, Y.: A 1/4 spatial-resolution daily sea surface temperature climatology based on a blended satellite and in situ analysis, J. Climate, 27, 8221–8228, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00293.1, 2014. 
Bao, Q., Lin, P., Zhou, T., Liu, Y., Yu, Y., Wu, G., He, B., He, J., Li, L., Li, J., Li, Y., Liu, H., Qiao, F., Song, Z., Wang, B., Wang, J., Wang, P., Wang, X., Wang, Z., Wu, B., Wu, T., Xu, Y., Yu, H., Zhao, W., Zheng, W., and Zhou, L.: The Flexible Global Ocean-Atmosphere-Land system model, Spectral Version 2: FGOALS-s2, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 30, 561–576, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-012-2113-9, 2013. 
Download
Short summary
This paper presents global comparisons of fundamental global climate variables from a suite of four pairs of matched low- and high-resolution ocean and sea ice simulations to assess the robustness of climate-relevant improvements in ocean simulations associated with moving from coarse (∼1°) to eddy-resolving (∼0.1°) horizontal resolutions. Despite significant improvements, greatly enhanced horizontal resolution does not deliver unambiguous bias reduction in all regions for all models.
Share