Articles | Volume 8, issue 8
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2611–2626, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2611-2015
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2611–2626, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2611-2015
Model description paper
24 Aug 2015
Model description paper | 24 Aug 2015

MEMLS3&a: Microwave Emission Model of Layered Snowpacks adapted to include backscattering

M. Proksch et al.

Related authors

Observation and modelling of snow at a polygonal tundra permafrost site: spatial variability and thermal implications
Isabelle Gouttevin, Moritz Langer, Henning Löwe, Julia Boike, Martin Proksch, and Martin Schneebeli
The Cryosphere, 12, 3693–3717, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3693-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3693-2018, 2018
Short summary
Measured and Modeled Snow Cover Properties across the Greenland Ice Sheet
Sascha Bellaire, Martin Proksch, Martin Schneebeli, Masashi Niwano, and Konrad Steffen
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2017-55,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2017-55, 2017
Preprint withdrawn
Nordic Snow Radar Experiment
Juha Lemmetyinen, Anna Kontu, Jouni Pulliainen, Juho Vehviläinen, Kimmo Rautiainen, Andreas Wiesmann, Christian Mätzler, Charles Werner, Helmut Rott, Thomas Nagler, Martin Schneebeli, Martin Proksch, Dirk Schüttemeyer, Michael Kern, and Malcolm W. J. Davidson
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 5, 403–415, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-5-403-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-5-403-2016, 2016
Anisotropy of seasonal snow measured by polarimetric phase differences in radar time series
Silvan Leinss, Henning Löwe, Martin Proksch, Juha Lemmetyinen, Andreas Wiesmann, and Irena Hajnsek
The Cryosphere, 10, 1771–1797, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-1771-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-1771-2016, 2016
Short summary
Arctic Snow Microstructure Experiment for the development of snow emission modelling
William Maslanka, Leena Leppänen, Anna Kontu, Mel Sandells, Juha Lemmetyinen, Martin Schneebeli, Martin Proksch, Margret Matzl, Henna-Reetta Hannula, and Robert Gurney
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 5, 85–94, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-5-85-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-5-85-2016, 2016
Short summary

Related subject area

Cryosphere
Improved representation of the contemporary Greenland ice sheet firn layer by IMAU-FDM v1.2G
Max Brils, Peter Kuipers Munneke, Willem Jan van de Berg, and Michiel van den Broeke
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7121–7138, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7121-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7121-2022, 2022
Short summary
Modeling the small-scale deposition of snow onto structured Arctic sea ice during a MOSAiC storm using snowBedFoam 1.0.
Océane Hames, Mahdi Jafari, David Nicholas Wagner, Ian Raphael, David Clemens-Sewall, Chris Polashenski, Matthew D. Shupe, Martin Schneebeli, and Michael Lehning
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6429–6449, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6429-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6429-2022, 2022
Short summary
Benchmarking the vertically integrated ice-sheet model IMAU-ICE (version 2.0)
Constantijn J. Berends, Heiko Goelzer, Thomas J. Reerink, Lennert B. Stap, and Roderik S. W. van de Wal
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5667–5688, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5667-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5667-2022, 2022
Short summary
SnowClim v1.0: high-resolution snow model and data for the western United States
Abby C. Lute, John Abatzoglou, and Timothy Link
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5045–5071, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5045-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5045-2022, 2022
Short summary
Snow Multidata Mapping and Modeling (S3M) 5.1: a distributed cryospheric model with dry and wet snow, data assimilation, glacier mass balance, and debris-driven melt
Francesco Avanzi, Simone Gabellani, Fabio Delogu, Francesco Silvestro, Edoardo Cremonese, Umberto Morra di Cella, Sara Ratto, and Hervé Stevenin
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4853–4879, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4853-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4853-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Arnaud, L., Picard, G., Champollion, N., Domine, F., Gallet, J. C., Lefebvre, E., Fily, M., and Barnola, J. M.: Measurement of vertical profiles of snow specific surface area with a 1 cm resolution using infrared reflectance: instrument description and validation, J. Glaciol., 57, 17–29, https://doi.org/10.3189/002214311795306664, 2011.
Chandrasekhar, S.: Radiative Transfer, Dover Publ., New York, NY, 1960.
Chang, W., Tan, S., Lemmetyinen, J., Tsang, L., Xu, X., and Yueh, S.: Dense media radiative transfer applied to SnowScat and SnowSAR, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl., 7, 3811–3825, https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2343519, 2014.
Denoth, A., Foglar, A., Weiland, P., Mätzler, C., and Aebischer, H.: A comparative study of instruments for measuring the liquid water content of snow, J. Appl. Phys., 56, 2154–2160, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.334215, 1984.
Ding, K.-H., Xu, X., and Tsang, L.: Electromagnetic scattering by bicontinuous random microstructures with discrete permittivities, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 48, 3139–3151, 2010.
Download
Short summary
The measurement of snow properties on global scale relies on microwave remote sensing data. The interpretation of the data is however challenging. Here we introduce MEMLS3&a, an extension of the snow emission model MEMLS, to include a backscatter model for active microwave remote sensing. In MEMLS3&a, snow input parameters can be derived by objective measurement methods, which avoids fitting the scattering efficiency of snow. The model is validated with combined active and passive measurements.