Articles | Volume 7, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-909-2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-909-2014
Development and technical paper
 | 
20 May 2014
Development and technical paper |  | 20 May 2014

A mimetic, semi-implicit, forward-in-time, finite volume shallow water model: comparison of hexagonal–icosahedral and cubed-sphere grids

J. Thuburn, C. J. Cotter, and T. Dubos

Related authors

Potential based Thermodynamics with Consistent Conservative Cascade Transport for Implicit Large Eddy Simulation: PTerodaC3TILES version 1.0
John Thuburn
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-153,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-153, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Using the UM dynamical cores to reproduce idealised 3-D flows
N. J. Mayne, I. Baraffe, D. M. Acreman, C. Smith, N. Wood, D. S. Amundsen, J. Thuburn, and D. R. Jackson
Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 3059–3087, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-3059-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-3059-2014, 2014

Related subject area

Numerical methods
Hydro-geomorphological modelling of leaky wooden dam efficacy from reach to catchment scale with CAESAR-Lisflood 1.9j
Joshua M. Wolstenholme, Christopher J. Skinner, David Milan, Robert E. Thomas, and Daniel R. Parsons
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1395–1411, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1395-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1395-2025, 2025
Short summary
Enhancing single precision with quasi-double precision: achieving double-precision accuracy in the Model for Prediction Across Scales – Atmosphere (MPAS-A) version 8.2.1
Jiayi Lai, Lanning Wang, Qizhong Wu, Yizhou Yang, and Fang Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1089–1102, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1089-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1089-2025, 2025
Short summary
Advances in land surface forecasting: a comparison of LSTM, gradient boosting, and feed-forward neural networks as prognostic state emulators in a case study with ecLand
Marieke Wesselkamp, Matthew Chantry, Ewan Pinnington, Margarita Choulga, Souhail Boussetta, Maria Kalweit, Joschka Bödecker, Carsten F. Dormann, Florian Pappenberger, and Gianpaolo Balsamo
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 921–937, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-921-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-921-2025, 2025
Short summary
Subgrid corrections for the linear inertial equations of a compound flood model – a case study using SFINCS 2.1.1 Dollerup release
Maarten van Ormondt, Tim Leijnse, Roel de Goede, Kees Nederhoff, and Ap van Dongeren
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 843–861, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-843-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-843-2025, 2025
Short summary
Introducing Iterative Model Calibration (IMC) v1.0: a generalizable framework for numerical model calibration with a CAESAR-Lisflood case study
Chayan Banerjee, Kien Nguyen, Clinton Fookes, Gregory Hancock, and Thomas Coulthard
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 803–818, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-803-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-803-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Arakawa, A. and Lamb, V. R.: Computational design of the basic dynamical processes of the UCLA general circulation model, in: "General Circulation Models of the Atmosphere", Methods in Computational Physics, Vol. 17, edited by: Chang, J., Academic Press, San Diego, 172–265, 1977.
Cotter, C. J. and Shipton, J.: Mixed finite elements for numerical weather prediction, J. Comput. Phys., 231, 7076–7091, 2012.
Crowley, W. P.: Numerical advection experiments, Mon. Weather Rev., 96, 1–11, 1968.
Cullen, M. J. P.: On the accuracy of the semi-geostrophic approximation, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 126, 1099–1115, 2000.
Cullen, M. J. P.: Modelling atmospheric flows, Acta Num., 16, 67–154, 2007.
Download
Share