Articles | Volume 15, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5021-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5021-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Model evaluation paper
| 
01 Jul 2022
Model evaluation paper |
| 01 Jul 2022
| 01 Jul 2022
Using a surrogate-assisted Bayesian framework to calibrate the runoff-generation scheme in the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) v1
Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest
National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA
Gautam Bisht
Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest
National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA
Khachik Sargsyan
Chemistry, Combustion, and Materials Science Center, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA, USA
Chang Liao
Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest
National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA
L. Ruby Leung
Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest
National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA
Related authors
Gautam Bisht, Lingcheng Li, Donghui Xu, Dalei Hao, Hoang Tran, and L. Ruby Leungy
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5918, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5918, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
Computer models of land help us understand water supplies, floods, snow, heat, and plant growth, but local landscape differences can be missed. We adjusted two model settings to better represent groundwater and flooding in a one-kilometer model of the contiguous United States, then compared its results with observations. It captured broad patterns but had important errors. Combining results into larger areas lost 34–44% of local detail, showing why detailed land models need further improvement.
Dongyu Feng, Zeli Tan, Donghui Xu, Jeffrey Johnson, and Gautam Bisht
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4859, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4859, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
We developed the River Dynamical Core sediment model version 1.0 to help Earth system models represent how sediment transports across rivers and floodplains. Tests ranging from simple experiments to Hurricane Harvey show that the model keeps track of sediment accurately, agrees with an established comparison model, and captures major flood and sediment patterns. This gives researchers a practical tool for studying how storms move sediment from land to the ocean.
Dongyu Feng, Zeli Tan, Darren Engwirda, Jonathan D. Wolfe, Donghui Xu, Chang Liao, Gautam Bisht, James J. Benedict, Tian Zhou, Mithun Deb, Hong-Yi Li, and L. Ruby Leung
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3619–3639, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-3619-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-3619-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Our study explores how riverine and coastal flooding during hurricanes is influenced by the interaction of atmosphere, land, river, and ocean conditions. Using an advanced Earth system model, we simulate Hurricane Irene to evaluate how meteorological and hydrological uncertainties affect flood modeling. Our findings reveal the importance of a multi-component modeling system, how hydrological conditions play critical roles in flood modeling, and greater flood risks if multiple factors are present.
Zeli Tan, Donghui Xu, Sourav Taraphdar, Jiangqin Ma, Gautam Bisht, and L. Ruby Leung
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 3833–3852, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3833-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3833-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Flow depth and velocity determine various river functions, but their high-resolution simulations are expensive. Here, we developed a downscaling approach that can provide fast and accurate estimation of high-resolution river hydrodynamics. The 84-fold acceleration achieved by the method makes reliable flood risk analysis that needs hundreds or thousands of model runs feasible. More importantly, it provides an opportunity to couple large-scale hydrodynamics with local processes in river models.
Ye Liu, Huilin Huang, Sing-Chun Wang, Tao Zhang, Donghui Xu, and Yang Chen
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4103–4117, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4103-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4103-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study integrates machine learning with a land surface model to improve wildfire predictions in North America. Traditional models struggle with accurately simulating burned areas due to simplified processes. By combining the predictive power of machine learning with a land model, our hybrid framework better captures fire dynamics. This approach enhances our understanding of wildfire behavior and aids in developing more effective climate and fire management strategies.
Donghui Xu, Gautam Bisht, Zeli Tan, Chang Liao, Tian Zhou, Hong-Yi Li, and L. Ruby Leung
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1197–1215, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1197-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1197-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We aim to disentangle the hydrological and hydraulic controls on streamflow variability in a fully coupled earth system model. We found that calibrating only one process (i.e., traditional calibration procedure) will result in unrealistic parameter values and poor performance of the water cycle, while the simulated streamflow is improved. To address this issue, we further proposed a two-step calibration procedure to reconcile the impacts from hydrological and hydraulic processes on streamflow.
Han Qiu, Gautam Bisht, Lingcheng Li, Dalei Hao, and Donghui Xu
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 143–167, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-143-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-143-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We developed and validated an inter-grid-cell lateral groundwater flow model for both saturated and unsaturated zone in the ELMv2.0 framework. The developed model was benchmarked against PFLOTRAN, a 3D subsurface flow and transport model and showed comparable performance with PFLOTRAN. The developed model was also applied to the Little Washita experimental watershed. The spatial pattern of simulated groundwater table depth agreed well with the global groundwater table benchmark dataset.
Dongyu Feng, Zeli Tan, Donghui Xu, and L. Ruby Leung
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3911–3934, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3911-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3911-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study assesses the flood risks concurrently induced by river flooding and coastal storm surge along the coast of the contiguous United States using statistical and numerical models. We reveal a few hotspots of such risks, the critical spatial variabilities within a river basin and over the whole US coast, and the uncertainties of the risk assessment. We highlight the importance of weighing different risk measures to avoid underestimating or exaggerating the compound flood impacts.
Dongyu Feng, Zeli Tan, Darren Engwirda, Chang Liao, Donghui Xu, Gautam Bisht, Tian Zhou, Hong-Yi Li, and L. Ruby Leung
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5473–5491, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5473-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5473-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Sea level rise, storm surge and river discharge can cause coastal backwater effects in downstream sections of rivers, creating critical flood risks. This study simulates the backwater effects using a large-scale river model on a coastal-refined computational mesh. By decomposing the backwater drivers, we revealed their relative importance and long-term variations. Our analysis highlights the increasing strength of backwater effects due to sea level rise and more frequent storm surge.
Hong-Yi Li, Zeli Tan, Hongbo Ma, Zhenduo Zhu, Guta Wakbulcho Abeshu, Senlin Zhu, Sagy Cohen, Tian Zhou, Donghui Xu, and L. Ruby Leung
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 665–688, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-665-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-665-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce a new multi-process river sediment module for Earth system models. Application and validation over the contiguous US indicate a satisfactory model performance over large river systems, including those heavily regulated by reservoirs. This new sediment module enables future modeling of the transportation and transformation of carbon and nutrients carried by the fine sediment along the river–ocean continuum to close the global carbon and nutrient cycles.
Gautam Bisht, Lingcheng Li, Donghui Xu, Dalei Hao, Hoang Tran, and L. Ruby Leungy
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5918, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5918, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
Computer models of land help us understand water supplies, floods, snow, heat, and plant growth, but local landscape differences can be missed. We adjusted two model settings to better represent groundwater and flooding in a one-kilometer model of the contiguous United States, then compared its results with observations. It captured broad patterns but had important errors. Combining results into larger areas lost 34–44% of local detail, showing why detailed land models need further improvement.
Pengfei Shi, L. Ruby Leung, Zhaoxia Pu, Samson Hagos, and Karthik Balaguru
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 8003–8023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-8003-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-8003-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Reliable climate prediction requires accurate ocean initial conditions. We developed an ocean data assimilation system that incorporates ocean temperature and salinity reanalysis into a climate model. This system improves simulations of climate variability from years to decades and of U.S. winter temperature and precipitation. Additional hindcasts show no appreciable initialization shock and reproduce physically coherent ENSO teleconnection patterns, supporting more reliable climate predictions.
Dongyu Feng, Zeli Tan, Donghui Xu, Jeffrey Johnson, and Gautam Bisht
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4859, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4859, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
We developed the River Dynamical Core sediment model version 1.0 to help Earth system models represent how sediment transports across rivers and floodplains. Tests ranging from simple experiments to Hurricane Harvey show that the model keeps track of sediment accurately, agrees with an established comparison model, and captures major flood and sediment patterns. This gives researchers a practical tool for studying how storms move sediment from land to the ocean.
Amen Al-Yaari, Chris Smith, Yi Yao, Kjetil S. Aas, L. Ruby Leung, Min-Hui Lo, Sonali McDermid, Larissa Nazarenko, Yadu Pokhrel, Yusuke Satoh, Tokuta Yokohata, and Wim Thiery
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4199, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4199, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we use the Irrigation Model Intercomparison Project (IRRMIP) to provide the first multi-model quantification of irrigation-induced effective radiative forcing (ERF) across seven Earth system models over 1902–2014. We find that the global multi-model mean ERF is positive but small (~0.023 W m⁻²). This small global signal masks regional heterogeneity: South Asia and West Central Asia show higher positive ERF (~0.25 W m⁻²), while East Asia shows a negative signal (−0.03 W m⁻²).
Yuanqi Hong, Guta Wakbulcho Abeshu, Hong-Yi Li, Dingbao Wang, Mengqi Zhao, Thomas Wild, Günter Blöschl, and L. Ruby Leung
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 30, 4293–4303, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-4293-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-4293-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Rain runs off in two main ways: saturation excess when soil is full, and infiltration excess when rain exceeds infiltration. They often occur simultaneously in a watershed, but most models treat them separately. We introduce a new theory that captures both processes within a single framework, tracking their shift over space and time. Tested over 181 U.S. watersheds, the theory well predicts streamflow in most watersheds and improves understanding of runoff under diverse climates.
Fang Li, David M. Lawrence, Brendan M. Rogers, Chantelle Burton, Huilin Huang, Yiquan Jiang, Johannes W. Kaiser, Matthew Kasoar, Hanna Lee, Ruby Leung, Lars Nieradzik, Aihui Wang, Daniel S. Ward, Ligeer Ce, Yangchun Li, Zhongda Lin, Apostolos Voulgarakis, and Yongkang Xue
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 3989–4007, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-3989-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-3989-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Extreme fire events are increasing, and fires are projected to rise across most regions, posing growing risks to ecosystems and society. As a key Earth system process, fire is now modeled in most Earth System Models (ESMs). FireMIP (Fire Modeling Intercomparison Project) within CMIP7 will evaluate fire simulations in state‑of‑the‑art ESMs, project future fire changes, and provide quantitative, process‑based understanding of fire's role in the Earth system.
Koichi Sakaguchi, Seth A. McGinnis, L. Ruby Leung, Melissa S. Bukovsky, Rachel R. McCrary, Ziming Chen, Chuan-Chieh Chang, and Yanjie Li
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 3643–3688, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-3643-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-3643-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We evaluated Rossby waves in dynamical downscaling simulations over North America, and their connections to surface air temperature variability and heatwaves. Simulated Rossby wave propagation is distorted by flow discontinuities at lateral boundaries and by biased mean wind patterns, thereby breaking the region-specific connections between Rossby waves and surface temperature. Adjusting simulated large-scale winds to match the forcing data can reduce these biases.
Tian Zhou, Yun Qian, and L. Ruby Leung
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2237, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2237, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
AI can now write scientific analysis code that looks correct but quietly produces wrong results. We tested whether asking the assistant to assemble analyses from a library of validated building blocks, rather than write code from scratch, makes it more reliable. Across six language models and seven Earth science tasks, free code writing succeeded only about five percent of the time while the constrained approach exceeded eighty percent, suggesting trust needs guardrails.
Shixuan Zhang, L. Ruby Leung, Bryce E. Harrop, Aniruddha Bora, George Karniadakis, Khemraj Shukla, and Kai Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 1937–1964, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-1937-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-1937-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a new method to guide the simulated atmosphere in an Earth system model so it better reflects real-world weather. By adjusting temperature and humidity, it reduces unwanted side effects and improves the realism of rainfall, energy flows, land–surface conditions, and extreme storms such as cyclones and atmospheric rivers. This makes the model more useful for testing its performance, understanding high-impact weather events, and creating reliable training data for machine learning.
Naser Mahfouz, Hassan Beydoun, Johannes Mülmenstädt, Noel Keen, Adam C. Varble, Luca Bertagna, Peter Bogenschutz, Andrew Bradley, Matthew W. Christensen, T. Conrad Clevenger, Aaron Donahue, Jerome Fast, James Foucar, Jean-Christophe Golaz, Oksana Guba, Walter Hannah, Benjamin Hillman, Robert Jacob, Wuyin Lin, Po-Lun Ma, Yun Qian, Balwinder Singh, Christopher Terai, Hailong Wang, Mingxuan Wu, Kai Zhang, Andrew Gettelman, Mark Taylor, L. Ruby Leung, Peter Caldwell, and Susannah Burrows
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 15105–15120, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-15105-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-15105-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Our study assesses the aerosol effective radiative forcing in a global cloud-resolving atmosphere model at ultra-high resolution. We demonstrate that global aerosol forcing signal can be robustly reproduced across resolutions when aerosol activation processes are carefully parameterized. Further, we argue that simplified prescribed aerosol schemes will open the door for further process/mechanism studies under controlled conditions.
Dongyu Feng, Zeli Tan, Darren Engwirda, Jonathan D. Wolfe, Donghui Xu, Chang Liao, Gautam Bisht, James J. Benedict, Tian Zhou, Mithun Deb, Hong-Yi Li, and L. Ruby Leung
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3619–3639, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-3619-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-3619-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Our study explores how riverine and coastal flooding during hurricanes is influenced by the interaction of atmosphere, land, river, and ocean conditions. Using an advanced Earth system model, we simulate Hurricane Irene to evaluate how meteorological and hydrological uncertainties affect flood modeling. Our findings reveal the importance of a multi-component modeling system, how hydrological conditions play critical roles in flood modeling, and greater flood risks if multiple factors are present.
Zeli Tan, Donghui Xu, Sourav Taraphdar, Jiangqin Ma, Gautam Bisht, and L. Ruby Leung
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 3833–3852, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3833-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3833-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Flow depth and velocity determine various river functions, but their high-resolution simulations are expensive. Here, we developed a downscaling approach that can provide fast and accurate estimation of high-resolution river hydrodynamics. The 84-fold acceleration achieved by the method makes reliable flood risk analysis that needs hundreds or thousands of model runs feasible. More importantly, it provides an opportunity to couple large-scale hydrodynamics with local processes in river models.
Jianfeng Li, Andrew Geiss, Zhe Feng, L. Ruby Leung, Yun Qian, and Wenjun Cui
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 3721–3740, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-3721-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-3721-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a high-resolution (4 km and hourly) observational derecho dataset over the United States east of the Rocky Mountains from 2004 to 2021 by using a mesoscale convective system dataset, bow echoes detected by a machine learning method, hourly gust speeds, and physically based identification criteria.
Chang Liao, L. Ruby Leung, Yilin Fang, Teklu Tesfa, and Robinson Negron-Juarez
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4601–4624, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4601-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4601-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding horizontal groundwater flow is important for understanding how water moves through the ground. Current climate models often simplify this process because they do not have information about the land surface that is detailed enough. Our study developed a new model that divides the land surface into hillslopes to better represent how groundwater flows. This model can help improve predictions of water availability and how it affects ecosystems.
Ye Liu, Huilin Huang, Sing-Chun Wang, Tao Zhang, Donghui Xu, and Yang Chen
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4103–4117, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4103-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4103-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study integrates machine learning with a land surface model to improve wildfire predictions in North America. Traditional models struggle with accurately simulating burned areas due to simplified processes. By combining the predictive power of machine learning with a land model, our hybrid framework better captures fire dynamics. This approach enhances our understanding of wildfire behavior and aids in developing more effective climate and fire management strategies.
Lingbo Li, Hong-Yi Li, Guta Abeshu, Jinyun Tang, L. Ruby Leung, Chang Liao, Zeli Tan, Hanqin Tian, Peter Thornton, and Xiaojuan Yang
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 2713–2733, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2713-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2713-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We have developed new maps that reveal how organic carbon from soil leaches into headwater streams over the contiguous United States. We use advanced artificial intelligence techniques and a massive amount of data, including observations at over 2500 gauges and a wealth of climate and environmental information. The maps are a critical step in understanding and predicting how carbon moves through our environment, hence making them a useful tool for tackling climate challenges.
Chang Liao, Darren Engwirda, Matthew G. Cooper, Mingke Li, and Yilin Fang
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 2035–2062, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2035-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2035-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Discrete global grid systems, or DGGS, are digital frameworks that help us organize information about our planet. Although scientists have used DGGS in areas like weather and nature, using them in the water cycle has been challenging because some core datasets are missing. We created a way to generate these datasets. We then developed the datasets in the Amazon and Yukon basins, which play important roles in our planet's climate. These datasets may help us improve our water cycle models.
Pengfei Shi, L. Ruby Leung, and Bin Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2443–2460, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2443-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2443-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Improving climate predictions has significant socio-economic impacts. In this study, we develop and apply a new weakly coupled ocean data assimilation (WCODA) system to a coupled climate model. The WCODA system improves simulations of ocean temperature and salinity across many global regions. This system is meant to advance our understanding of the ocean's role in climate predictability.
Guta Wakbulcho Abeshu, Hong-Yi Li, Mingjie Shi, and L. Ruby Leung
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1847–1864, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1847-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1847-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study examined how water availability, climate dryness, and plant productivity interact at the catchment scale. Using various indices and statistical methods, we found a 0–2-month lag in these interactions. Strong correlations during peak-productivity months were observed, with a notable hysteresis effect in vegetation response to changes in water availability and climate dryness. The findings help better understand catchment responses to climate variability.
Katherine M. Smith, Alice M. Barthel, LeAnn M. Conlon, Luke P. Van Roekel, Anthony Bartoletti, Jean-Christophe Golaz, Chengzhu Zhang, Carolyn Branecky Begeman, James J. Benedict, Gautam Bisht, Yan Feng, Walter Hannah, Bryce E. Harrop, Nicole Jeffery, Wuyin Lin, Po-Lun Ma, Mathew E. Maltrud, Mark R. Petersen, Balwinder Singh, Qi Tang, Teklu Tesfa, Jonathan D. Wolfe, Shaocheng Xie, Xue Zheng, Karthik Balaguru, Oluwayemi Garuba, Peter Gleckler, Aixue Hu, Jiwoo Lee, Ben Moore-Maley, and Ana C. Ordoñez
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1613–1633, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1613-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1613-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Version 2.1 of the U.S. Department of Energy's Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) adds the Fox-Kemper et al. (2011) mixed-layer eddy parameterization, which restratifies the ocean surface layer through an overturning streamfunction. Results include surface layer bias reduction in temperature, salinity, and sea ice extent in the North Atlantic; a small strengthening of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation; and improvements to many atmospheric climatological variables.
Huilin Huang, Yun Qian, Gautam Bisht, Jiali Wang, Tirthankar Chakraborty, Dalei Hao, Jianfeng Li, Travis Thurber, Balwinder Singh, Zhao Yang, Ye Liu, Pengfei Xue, William J. Sacks, Ethan Coon, and Robert Hetland
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1427–1443, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1427-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1427-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We integrate the E3SM Land Model (ELM) with the WRF model through the Lightweight Infrastructure for Land Atmosphere Coupling (LILAC) Earth System Modeling Framework (ESMF). This framework includes a top-level driver, LILAC, for variable communication between WRF and ELM and ESMF caps for ELM initialization, execution, and finalization. The LILAC–ESMF framework maintains the integrity of the ELM's source code structure and facilitates the transfer of future ELM model developments to WRF-ELM.
Malcolm J. Roberts, Kevin A. Reed, Qing Bao, Joseph J. Barsugli, Suzana J. Camargo, Louis-Philippe Caron, Ping Chang, Cheng-Ta Chen, Hannah M. Christensen, Gokhan Danabasoglu, Ivy Frenger, Neven S. Fučkar, Shabeh ul Hasson, Helene T. Hewitt, Huanping Huang, Daehyun Kim, Chihiro Kodama, Michael Lai, Lai-Yung Ruby Leung, Ryo Mizuta, Paulo Nobre, Pablo Ortega, Dominique Paquin, Christopher D. Roberts, Enrico Scoccimarro, Jon Seddon, Anne Marie Treguier, Chia-Ying Tu, Paul A. Ullrich, Pier Luigi Vidale, Michael F. Wehner, Colin M. Zarzycki, Bosong Zhang, Wei Zhang, and Ming Zhao
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1307–1332, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1307-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1307-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
HighResMIP2 is a model intercomparison project focusing on high-resolution global climate models, that is, those with grid spacings of 25 km or less in the atmosphere and ocean, using simulations of decades to a century in length. We are proposing an update of our simulation protocol to make the models more applicable to key questions for climate variability and hazard in present-day and future projections and to build links with other communities to provide more robust climate information.
Yilin Fang, Hoang Viet Tran, and L. Ruby Leung
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 19–32, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-19-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-19-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Hurricanes may worsen water quality in the lower Mississippi River basin (LMRB) by increasing nutrient runoff. We found that runoff parameterizations greatly affect nitrate–nitrogen runoff simulated using an Earth system land model. Our simulations predicted increased nitrogen runoff in the LMRB during Hurricane Ida in 2021, albeit less pronounced than the observations, indicating areas for model improvement to better understand and manage nutrient runoff loss during hurricanes in the region.
Fang Li, Xiang Song, Sandy P. Harrison, Jennifer R. Marlon, Zhongda Lin, L. Ruby Leung, Jörg Schwinger, Virginie Marécal, Shiyu Wang, Daniel S. Ward, Xiao Dong, Hanna Lee, Lars Nieradzik, Sam S. Rabin, and Roland Séférian
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8751–8771, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8751-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8751-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study provides the first comprehensive assessment of historical fire simulations from 19 Earth system models in phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). Most models reproduce global totals, spatial patterns, seasonality, and regional historical changes well but fail to simulate the recent decline in global burned area and underestimate the fire response to climate variability. CMIP6 simulations address three critical issues of phase-5 models.
Johannes Mülmenstädt, Andrew S. Ackerman, Ann M. Fridlind, Meng Huang, Po-Lun Ma, Naser Mahfouz, Susanne E. Bauer, Susannah M. Burrows, Matthew W. Christensen, Sudhakar Dipu, Andrew Gettelman, L. Ruby Leung, Florian Tornow, Johannes Quaas, Adam C. Varble, Hailong Wang, Kai Zhang, and Youtong Zheng
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 13633–13652, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13633-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13633-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Stratocumulus clouds play a large role in Earth's climate by reflecting incoming solar energy back to space. Turbulence at stratocumulus cloud top mixes in dry, warm air, which can lead to cloud dissipation. This process is challenging for coarse-resolution global models to represent. We show that global models nevertheless agree well with our process understanding. Global models also think the process is less important for the climate than other lines of evidence have led us to conclude.
Fan Mei, Jennifer M. Comstock, Mikhail S. Pekour, Jerome D. Fast, Krista L. Gaustad, Beat Schmid, Shuaiqi Tang, Damao Zhang, John E. Shilling, Jason M. Tomlinson, Adam C. Varble, Jian Wang, L. Ruby Leung, Lawrence Kleinman, Scot Martin, Sebastien C. Biraud, Brian D. Ermold, and Kenneth W. Burk
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 5429–5448, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-5429-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-5429-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Our study explores a comprehensive dataset from airborne field studies (2013–2018) conducted using the US Department of Energy's Gulfstream 1 (G-1). The 236 flights span diverse regions, including the Arctic, US Southern Great Plains, US West Coast, eastern North Atlantic, Amazon Basin in Brazil, and Sierras de Córdoba range in Argentina. This dataset provides unique insights into atmospheric dynamics, aerosols, and clouds and makes data available in a more accessible format.
Johannes Mülmenstädt, Edward Gryspeerdt, Sudhakar Dipu, Johannes Quaas, Andrew S. Ackerman, Ann M. Fridlind, Florian Tornow, Susanne E. Bauer, Andrew Gettelman, Yi Ming, Youtong Zheng, Po-Lun Ma, Hailong Wang, Kai Zhang, Matthew W. Christensen, Adam C. Varble, L. Ruby Leung, Xiaohong Liu, David Neubauer, Daniel G. Partridge, Philip Stier, and Toshihiko Takemura
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 7331–7345, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7331-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7331-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Human activities release copious amounts of small particles called aerosols into the atmosphere. These particles change how much sunlight clouds reflect to space, an important human perturbation of the climate, whose magnitude is highly uncertain. We found that the latest climate models show a negative correlation but a positive causal relationship between aerosols and cloud water. This means we need to be very careful when we interpret observational studies that can only see correlation.
Tapio Schneider, L. Ruby Leung, and Robert C. J. Wills
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 7041–7062, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7041-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7041-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Climate models are crucial for predicting climate change in detail. This paper proposes a balanced approach to improving their accuracy by combining traditional process-based methods with modern artificial intelligence (AI) techniques while maximizing the resolution to allow for ensemble simulations. The authors propose using AI to learn from both observational and simulated data while incorporating existing physical knowledge to reduce data demands and improve climate prediction reliability.
Lingcheng Li, Gautam Bisht, Dalei Hao, and L. Ruby Leung
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 2007–2032, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2007-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2007-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study fills a gap to meet the emerging needs of kilometer-scale Earth system modeling by developing global 1 km land surface parameters for land use, vegetation, soil, and topography. Our demonstration simulations highlight the substantial impacts of these parameters on spatial variability and information loss in water and energy simulations. Using advanced explainable machine learning methods, we identified influential factors driving spatial variability and information loss.
Bryce E. Harrop, Jian Lu, L. Ruby Leung, William K. M. Lau, Kyu-Myong Kim, Brian Medeiros, Brian J. Soden, Gabriel A. Vecchi, Bosong Zhang, and Balwinder Singh
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3111–3135, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3111-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3111-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Seven new experimental setups designed to interfere with cloud radiative heating have been added to the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM). These experiments include both those that test the mean impact of cloud radiative heating and those examining its covariance with circulations. This paper documents the code changes and steps needed to run these experiments. Results corroborate prior findings for how cloud radiative heating impacts circulations and rainfall patterns.
Pengfei Shi, L. Ruby Leung, Bin Wang, Kai Zhang, Samson M. Hagos, and Shixuan Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3025–3040, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3025-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3025-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Improving climate predictions have profound socio-economic impacts. This study introduces a new weakly coupled land data assimilation (WCLDA) system for a coupled climate model. We demonstrate improved simulation of soil moisture and temperature in many global regions and throughout the soil layers. Furthermore, significant improvements are also found in reproducing the time evolution of the 2012 US Midwest drought. The WCLDA system provides the groundwork for future predictability studies.
Yawen Liu, Yun Qian, Philip J. Rasch, Kai Zhang, Lai-yung Ruby Leung, Yuhang Wang, Minghuai Wang, Hailong Wang, Xin Huang, and Xiu-Qun Yang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 3115–3128, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3115-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3115-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Fire management has long been a challenge. Here we report that spring-peak fire activity over southern Mexico and Central America (SMCA) has a distinct quasi-biennial signal by measuring multiple fire metrics. This signal is initially driven by quasi-biennial variability in precipitation and is further amplified by positive feedback of fire–precipitation interaction at short timescales. This work highlights the importance of fire–climate interactions in shaping fires on an interannual scale.
Donghui Xu, Gautam Bisht, Zeli Tan, Chang Liao, Tian Zhou, Hong-Yi Li, and L. Ruby Leung
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1197–1215, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1197-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1197-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We aim to disentangle the hydrological and hydraulic controls on streamflow variability in a fully coupled earth system model. We found that calibrating only one process (i.e., traditional calibration procedure) will result in unrealistic parameter values and poor performance of the water cycle, while the simulated streamflow is improved. To address this issue, we further proposed a two-step calibration procedure to reconcile the impacts from hydrological and hydraulic processes on streamflow.
Han Qiu, Gautam Bisht, Lingcheng Li, Dalei Hao, and Donghui Xu
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 143–167, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-143-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-143-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We developed and validated an inter-grid-cell lateral groundwater flow model for both saturated and unsaturated zone in the ELMv2.0 framework. The developed model was benchmarked against PFLOTRAN, a 3D subsurface flow and transport model and showed comparable performance with PFLOTRAN. The developed model was also applied to the Little Washita experimental watershed. The spatial pattern of simulated groundwater table depth agreed well with the global groundwater table benchmark dataset.
Calvin Howes, Pablo E. Saide, Hugh Coe, Amie Dobracki, Steffen Freitag, Jim M. Haywood, Steven G. Howell, Siddhant Gupta, Janek Uin, Mary Kacarab, Chongai Kuang, L. Ruby Leung, Athanasios Nenes, Greg M. McFarquhar, James Podolske, Jens Redemann, Arthur J. Sedlacek, Kenneth L. Thornhill, Jenny P. S. Wong, Robert Wood, Huihui Wu, Yang Zhang, Jianhao Zhang, and Paquita Zuidema
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 13911–13940, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13911-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13911-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
To better understand smoke properties and its interactions with clouds, we compare the WRF-CAM5 model with observations from ORACLES, CLARIFY, and LASIC field campaigns in the southeastern Atlantic in August 2017. The model transports and mixes smoke well but does not fully capture some important processes. These include smoke chemical and physical aging over 4–12 days, smoke removal by rain, sulfate particle formation, aerosol activation into cloud droplets, and boundary layer turbulence.
Dongyu Feng, Zeli Tan, Donghui Xu, and L. Ruby Leung
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3911–3934, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3911-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3911-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study assesses the flood risks concurrently induced by river flooding and coastal storm surge along the coast of the contiguous United States using statistical and numerical models. We reveal a few hotspots of such risks, the critical spatial variabilities within a river basin and over the whole US coast, and the uncertainties of the risk assessment. We highlight the importance of weighing different risk measures to avoid underestimating or exaggerating the compound flood impacts.
Lingcheng Li, Yilin Fang, Zhonghua Zheng, Mingjie Shi, Marcos Longo, Charles D. Koven, Jennifer A. Holm, Rosie A. Fisher, Nate G. McDowell, Jeffrey Chambers, and L. Ruby Leung
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4017–4040, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4017-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4017-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Accurately modeling plant coexistence in vegetation demographic models like ELM-FATES is challenging. This study proposes a repeatable method that uses machine-learning-based surrogate models to optimize plant trait parameters in ELM-FATES. Our approach significantly improves plant coexistence modeling, thus reducing errors. It has important implications for modeling ecosystem dynamics in response to climate change.
Qi Tang, Jean-Christophe Golaz, Luke P. Van Roekel, Mark A. Taylor, Wuyin Lin, Benjamin R. Hillman, Paul A. Ullrich, Andrew M. Bradley, Oksana Guba, Jonathan D. Wolfe, Tian Zhou, Kai Zhang, Xue Zheng, Yunyan Zhang, Meng Zhang, Mingxuan Wu, Hailong Wang, Cheng Tao, Balwinder Singh, Alan M. Rhoades, Yi Qin, Hong-Yi Li, Yan Feng, Yuying Zhang, Chengzhu Zhang, Charles S. Zender, Shaocheng Xie, Erika L. Roesler, Andrew F. Roberts, Azamat Mametjanov, Mathew E. Maltrud, Noel D. Keen, Robert L. Jacob, Christiane Jablonowski, Owen K. Hughes, Ryan M. Forsyth, Alan V. Di Vittorio, Peter M. Caldwell, Gautam Bisht, Renata B. McCoy, L. Ruby Leung, and David C. Bader
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3953–3995, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3953-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3953-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
High-resolution simulations are superior to low-resolution ones in capturing regional climate changes and climate extremes. However, uniformly reducing the grid size of a global Earth system model is too computationally expensive. We provide an overview of the fully coupled regionally refined model (RRM) of E3SMv2 and document a first-of-its-kind set of climate production simulations using RRM at an economic cost. The key to this success is our innovative hybrid time step method.
Koichi Sakaguchi, L. Ruby Leung, Colin M. Zarzycki, Jihyeon Jang, Seth McGinnis, Bryce E. Harrop, William C. Skamarock, Andrew Gettelman, Chun Zhao, William J. Gutowski, Stephen Leak, and Linda Mearns
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3029–3081, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3029-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3029-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We document details of the regional climate downscaling dataset produced by a global variable-resolution model. The experiment is unique in that it follows a standard protocol designed for coordinated experiments of regional models. We found negligible influence of post-processing on statistical analysis, importance of simulation quality outside of the target region, and computational challenges that our model code faced due to rapidly changing super computer systems.
Zhe Feng, Joseph Hardin, Hannah C. Barnes, Jianfeng Li, L. Ruby Leung, Adam Varble, and Zhixiao Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2753–2776, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2753-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2753-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
PyFLEXTRKR is a flexible atmospheric feature tracking framework with specific capabilities to track convective clouds from a variety of observations and model simulations. The package has a collection of multi-object identification algorithms and has been optimized for large datasets. This paper describes the algorithms and demonstrates applications for tracking deep convective cells and mesoscale convective systems from observations and model simulations at a wide range of scales.
Zeyu Xue, Paul Ullrich, and Lai-Yung Ruby Leung
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1909–1927, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1909-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1909-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We examine the sensitivity and robustness of conclusions drawn from the PGW method over the NEUS by conducting multiple PGW experiments and varying the perturbation spatial scales and choice of perturbed meteorological variables to provide a guideline for this increasingly popular regional modeling method. Overall, we recommend PGW experiments be performed with perturbations to temperature or the combination of temperature and wind at the gridpoint scale, depending on the research question.
Dalei Hao, Gautam Bisht, Karl Rittger, Timbo Stillinger, Edward Bair, Yu Gu, and L. Ruby Leung
The Cryosphere, 17, 673–697, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-673-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-673-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We comprehensively evaluated the snow simulations in E3SM land model over the western United States in terms of spatial patterns, temporal correlations, interannual variabilities, elevation gradients, and change with forest cover of snow properties and snow phenology. Our study underscores the need for diagnosing model biases and improving the model representations of snow properties and snow phenology in mountainous areas for more credible simulation and future projection of mountain snowpack.
Chandan Sarangi, Yun Qian, L. Ruby Leung, Yang Zhang, Yufei Zou, and Yuhang Wang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 1769–1783, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-1769-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-1769-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We show that for air quality, the densely populated eastern US may see even larger impacts of wildfires due to long-distance smoke transport and associated positive climatic impacts, partially compensating the improvements from regulations on anthropogenic emissions. This study highlights the tension between natural and anthropogenic contributions and the non-local nature of air pollution that complicate regulatory strategies for improving future regional air quality for human health.
Dalei Hao, Gautam Bisht, Karl Rittger, Edward Bair, Cenlin He, Huilin Huang, Cheng Dang, Timbo Stillinger, Yu Gu, Hailong Wang, Yun Qian, and L. Ruby Leung
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 75–94, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-75-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-75-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Snow with the highest albedo of land surface plays a vital role in Earth’s surface energy budget and water cycle. This study accounts for the impacts of snow grain shape and mixing state of light-absorbing particles with snow on snow albedo in the E3SM land model. The findings advance our understanding of the role of snow grain shape and mixing state of LAP–snow in land surface processes and offer guidance for improving snow simulations and radiative forcing estimates in Earth system models.
Dongyu Feng, Zeli Tan, Darren Engwirda, Chang Liao, Donghui Xu, Gautam Bisht, Tian Zhou, Hong-Yi Li, and L. Ruby Leung
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5473–5491, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5473-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5473-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Sea level rise, storm surge and river discharge can cause coastal backwater effects in downstream sections of rivers, creating critical flood risks. This study simulates the backwater effects using a large-scale river model on a coastal-refined computational mesh. By decomposing the backwater drivers, we revealed their relative importance and long-term variations. Our analysis highlights the increasing strength of backwater effects due to sea level rise and more frequent storm surge.
Yilin Fang, L. Ruby Leung, Charles D. Koven, Gautam Bisht, Matteo Detto, Yanyan Cheng, Nate McDowell, Helene Muller-Landau, S. Joseph Wright, and Jeffrey Q. Chambers
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7879–7901, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7879-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7879-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We develop a model that integrates an Earth system model with a three-dimensional hydrology model to explicitly resolve hillslope topography and water flow underneath the land surface to understand how local-scale hydrologic processes modulate vegetation along water availability gradients. Our coupled model can be used to improve the understanding of the diverse impact of local heterogeneity and water flux on nutrient availability and plant communities.
Yilin Fang, L. Ruby Leung, Ryan Knox, Charlie Koven, and Ben Bond-Lamberty
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6385–6398, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6385-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6385-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Accounting for water movement in the soil and water transport within the plant is important for plant growth in Earth system modeling. We implemented different numerical approaches for a plant hydrodynamic model and compared their impacts on the simulated aboveground biomass (AGB) at single points and globally. We found care should be taken when discretizing the number of soil layers for numerical simulations as it can significantly affect AGB if accuracy and computational costs are of concern.
Meng Huang, Po-Lun Ma, Nathaniel W. Chaney, Dalei Hao, Gautam Bisht, Megan D. Fowler, Vincent E. Larson, and L. Ruby Leung
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6371–6384, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6371-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6371-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The land surface in one grid cell may be diverse in character. This study uses an explicit way to account for that subgrid diversity in a state-of-the-art Earth system model (ESM) and explores its implications for the overlying atmosphere. We find that the shallow clouds are increased significantly with the land surface diversity. Our work highlights the importance of accurately representing the land surface and its interaction with the atmosphere in next-generation ESMs.
Lingcheng Li, Gautam Bisht, and L. Ruby Leung
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5489–5510, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5489-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5489-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Land surface heterogeneity plays a critical role in the terrestrial water, energy, and biogeochemical cycles. Our study systematically quantified the effects of four dominant heterogeneity sources on water and energy partitioning via Sobol' indices. We found that atmospheric forcing and land use land cover are the most dominant heterogeneity sources in determining spatial variability of water and energy partitioning. Our findings can help prioritize the future development of land surface models.
Sol Kim, L. Ruby Leung, Bin Guan, and John C. H. Chiang
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5461–5480, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5461-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5461-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) project is a state-of-the-science Earth system model developed by the US Department of Energy (DOE). Understanding how the water cycle behaves in this model is of particular importance to the DOE’s mission. Atmospheric rivers (ARs) – which are crucial to the global water cycle – move vast amounts of water vapor through the sky and produce rain and snow. We find that this model reliably represents atmospheric rivers around the world.
Kai Zhang, Wentao Zhang, Hui Wan, Philip J. Rasch, Steven J. Ghan, Richard C. Easter, Xiangjun Shi, Yong Wang, Hailong Wang, Po-Lun Ma, Shixuan Zhang, Jian Sun, Susannah M. Burrows, Manish Shrivastava, Balwinder Singh, Yun Qian, Xiaohong Liu, Jean-Christophe Golaz, Qi Tang, Xue Zheng, Shaocheng Xie, Wuyin Lin, Yan Feng, Minghuai Wang, Jin-Ho Yoon, and L. Ruby Leung
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 9129–9160, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9129-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9129-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Here we analyze the effective aerosol forcing simulated by E3SM version 1 using both century-long free-running and short nudged simulations. The aerosol forcing in E3SMv1 is relatively large compared to other models, mainly due to the large indirect aerosol effect. Aerosol-induced changes in liquid and ice cloud properties in E3SMv1 have a strong correlation. The aerosol forcing estimates in E3SMv1 are sensitive to the parameterization changes in both liquid and ice cloud processes.
Yun Lin, Jiwen Fan, Pengfei Li, Lai-yung Ruby Leung, Paul J. DeMott, Lexie Goldberger, Jennifer Comstock, Ying Liu, Jong-Hoon Jeong, and Jason Tomlinson
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 6749–6771, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-6749-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-6749-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
How sea spray aerosols may affect cloud and precipitation over the region by acting as ice-nucleating particles (INPs) is unknown. We explored the effects of INPs from marine aerosols on orographic cloud and precipitation for an atmospheric river event observed during the 2015 ACAPEX field campaign. The marine INPs enhance the formation of ice and snow, leading to less shallow warm clouds but more mixed-phase and deep clouds. This work suggests models need to consider the impacts of marine INPs.
Pinya Wang, Yang Yang, Huimin Li, Lei Chen, Ruijun Dang, Daokai Xue, Baojie Li, Jianping Tang, L. Ruby Leung, and Hong Liao
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 4705–4719, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4705-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4705-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
China is now suffering from both severe ozone (O3) pollution and heat events. We highlight that North China Plain is the hot spot of the co-occurrences of extremes in O3 and high temperatures in China. Such coupled extremes exhibit an increasing trend during 2014–2019 and will continue to increase until the middle of this century. And the coupled extremes impose more severe health impacts to human than O3 pollution occurring alone because of elevated O3 levels and temperatures.
Po-Lun Ma, Bryce E. Harrop, Vincent E. Larson, Richard B. Neale, Andrew Gettelman, Hugh Morrison, Hailong Wang, Kai Zhang, Stephen A. Klein, Mark D. Zelinka, Yuying Zhang, Yun Qian, Jin-Ho Yoon, Christopher R. Jones, Meng Huang, Sheng-Lun Tai, Balwinder Singh, Peter A. Bogenschutz, Xue Zheng, Wuyin Lin, Johannes Quaas, Hélène Chepfer, Michael A. Brunke, Xubin Zeng, Johannes Mülmenstädt, Samson Hagos, Zhibo Zhang, Hua Song, Xiaohong Liu, Michael S. Pritchard, Hui Wan, Jingyu Wang, Qi Tang, Peter M. Caldwell, Jiwen Fan, Larry K. Berg, Jerome D. Fast, Mark A. Taylor, Jean-Christophe Golaz, Shaocheng Xie, Philip J. Rasch, and L. Ruby Leung
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2881–2916, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2881-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2881-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
An alternative set of parameters for E3SM Atmospheric Model version 1 has been developed based on a tuning strategy that focuses on clouds. When clouds in every regime are improved, other aspects of the model are also improved, even though they are not the direct targets for calibration. The recalibrated model shows a lower sensitivity to anthropogenic aerosols and surface warming, suggesting potential improvements to the simulated climate in the past and future.
Sally S.-C. Wang, Yun Qian, L. Ruby Leung, and Yang Zhang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 3445–3468, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3445-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3445-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study develops an interpretable machine learning (ML) model predicting monthly PM2.5 fire emission over the contiguous US at 0.25° resolution and compares the prediction skills of the ML and process-based models. The comparison facilitates attributions of model biases and better understanding of the strengths and uncertainties in the two types of models at regional scales, for informing future model development and their applications in fire emission projection.
Guta Wakbulcho Abeshu, Hong-Yi Li, Zhenduo Zhu, Zeli Tan, and L. Ruby Leung
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 929–942, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-929-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-929-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Existing riverbed sediment particle size data are sparsely available at individual sites. We develop a continuous map of median riverbed sediment particle size over the contiguous US corresponding to millions of river segments based on the existing observations and machine learning methods. This map is useful for research in large-scale river sediment using model- and data-driven approaches, teaching environmental and earth system sciences, planning and managing floodplain zones, etc.
Hong-Yi Li, Zeli Tan, Hongbo Ma, Zhenduo Zhu, Guta Wakbulcho Abeshu, Senlin Zhu, Sagy Cohen, Tian Zhou, Donghui Xu, and L. Ruby Leung
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 665–688, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-665-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-665-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce a new multi-process river sediment module for Earth system models. Application and validation over the contiguous US indicate a satisfactory model performance over large river systems, including those heavily regulated by reservoirs. This new sediment module enables future modeling of the transportation and transformation of carbon and nutrients carried by the fine sediment along the river–ocean continuum to close the global carbon and nutrient cycles.
Claudia Tebaldi, Kalyn Dorheim, Michael Wehner, and Ruby Leung
Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 1427–1501, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-1427-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-1427-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We address the question of how large an initial condition ensemble of climate model simulations should be if we are concerned with accurately projecting future changes in temperature and precipitation extremes. We find that for most cases (and both models considered), an ensemble of 20–25 members is sufficient for many extreme metrics, spatial scales and time horizons. This may leave computational resources to tackle other uncertainties in climate model simulations with our ensembles.
Cited articles
Alkama, R., Decharme, B., Douville, H., and Ribes, A.: Trends in Global and
Basin-Scale Runoff over the Late Twentieth Century: Methodological Issues
and Sources of Uncertainty, J. Climate, 24, 3000–3014,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3921.1, 2011.
Alkama, R., Marchand, L., Ribes, A., and Decharme, B.: Detection of global runoff changes: results from observations and CMIP5 experiments, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 2967–2979, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-2967-2013, 2013.
Andreadis, K. M., Schumann, G. J.-P., and Pavelsky, T.: A simple global
river bankfull width and depth database, Water Resour. Res., 49, 7164–7168,
https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20440, 2013.
Bechtold, B.: Violin Plots for Matlab, Github Project, Zenodo [code],
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4559847, 2016.
Beck, H. E., van Dijk, A. I. J. M., Miralles, D. G., de Jeu, R. A. M.,
Bruijnzeel, L. A., McVicar, T. R., and Schellekens, J.: Global patterns in
base flow index and recession based on streamflow observations from 3394
catchments, Water Resour. Res., 49, 7843–7863, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR013918, 2013.
Beck, H. E., van Dijk, A. I. J. M., de Roo, A., Dutra, E., Fink, G., Orth, R., and Schellekens, J.: Global evaluation of runoff from 10 state-of-the-art hydrological models, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2881–2903, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2881-2017, 2017.
Bisht, G., Riley, W. J., Hammond, G. E., and Lorenzetti, D. M.: Development and evaluation of a variably saturated flow model in the global E3SM Land Model (ELM) version 1.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4085–4102, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4085-2018, 2018.
Bosmans, J. H. C., van Beek, L. P. H., Sutanudjaja, E. H., and Bierkens, M. F. P.: Hydrological impacts of global land cover change and human water use, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 5603–5626, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5603-2017, 2017.
Breiman, L.: Random Forests, Mach. Learn., 45, 5–32,
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324, 2001.
Brunke, M. A., Broxton, P., Pelletier, J., Gochis, D., Hazenberg, P.,
Lawrence, D. M., Leung, L. R., Niu, G.-Y., Troch, P. A., and Zeng, X.:
Implementing and evaluating variable soil thickness in the Community Land
Model, version 4.5 (CLM4. 5), J. Climate, 29, 3441–3461, 2016.
Chegwidden, O. S., Rupp, D. E., and Nijssen, B.: Climate change alters flood
magnitudes and mechanisms in climatically-diverse headwaters across the
northwestern United States, Environ. Res. Lett., 15, 094048,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab986f, 2020.
Clark, E. A., Sheffield, J., van Vliet, M. T., Nijssen, B., and Lettenmaier,
D. P.: Continental runoff into the oceans (1950–2008), J. Hydrometeorol., 16,
1502–1520, 2015.
Collier, N., Hoffman, F. M., Lawrence, D. M., Keppel-Aleks, G., Koven, C.
D., Riley, W. J., Mu, M., and Randerson, J. T.: The International Land Model
Benchmarking (ILAMB) System: Design, Theory, and Implementation, J. Adv. Model.
Earth Sy., 10, 2731–2754, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001354,
2018 (code available at: https://doi.org/10.18139/ILAMB.v002.00/1251621).
Cosby, B. J., Hornberger, G. M., Clapp, R. B., and Ginn, T. R.: A
Statistical Exploration of the Relationships of Soil Moisture
Characteristics to the Physical Properties of Soils, Water Resour. Res., 20,
682–690, https://doi.org/10.1029/WR020i006p00682, 1984.
Dagon, K., Sanderson, B. M., Fisher, R. A., and Lawrence, D. M.: A machine
learning approach to emulation and biophysical parameter estimation with the
Community Land Model, version 5, Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 6,
223–244, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-6-223-2020, 2020.
Dai, A.: Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models,
Nat. Clim. Change, 3, 52–58, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1633, 2013.
Dai, A., Qian, T., Trenberth, K. E., and Milliman, J. D.: Changes in
Continental Freshwater Discharge from 1948 to 2004, J. Climate, 22,
2773–2792, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2592.1, 2009.
Debusschere, B., Sargsyan, K., Safta, C., and Chowdhary, K.: Uncertainty
Quantification Toolkit (UQTk), in: Handbook of Uncertainty Quantification,
edited by: Ghanem, R., Higdon, D., and Owhadi, H., Springer International
Publishing, Cham, 1–21, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11259-6_56-1, 2016.
Debusschere, B. J., Najm, H. N., Pébay, P. P., Knio, O. M., Ghanem, R.
G., and Maître, O. P. L.: Numerical Challenges in the Use of Polynomial
Chaos Representations for Stochastic Processes, SIAM J. Sci.
Comput., 26, 698–719, https://doi.org/10.1137/s1064827503427741, 2004.
Decharme, B., Delire, C., Minvielle, M., Colin, J., Vergnes, J.-P., Alias,
A., Saint-Martin, D., Séférian, R., Sénési, S., and
Voldoire, A.: Recent Changes in the ISBA-CTRIP Land Surface System for Use
in the CNRM-CM6 Climate Model and in Global Off-Line Hydrological
Applications, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 11, 1207–1252, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001545, 2019.
Do, H. X., Gudmundsson, L., Leonard, M., and Westra, S.: The Global Streamflow Indices and Metadata Archive (GSIM) – Part 1: The production of a daily streamflow archive and metadata, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 765–785, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-765-2018, 2018.
Doocy, S., Daniels, A., Murray, S., and Kirsch, T. D.: The human impact of
floods: a historical review of events 1980–2009 and systematic literature
review, PLoS Curr., 5, https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.f4deb457904936b07c09daa98ee8171a,
2013.
Drewniak, B. A.: Simulating Dynamic Roots in the Energy Exascale Earth
System Land Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 11, 338–359, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001334, 2019.
Dwelle, M. C., Kim, J., Sargsyan, K., and Ivanov, V. Y.: Streamflow,
stomata, and soil pits: Sources of inference for complex models with fast,
robust uncertainty quantification, Adv. Water Resour., 125, 13–31, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.01.002, 2019.
Ekici, A., Lee, H., Lawrence, D. M., Swenson, S. C., and Prigent, C.: Ground subsidence effects on simulating dynamic high-latitude surface inundation under permafrost thaw using CLM5, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 5291–5300, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-5291-2019, 2019.
Fischer, E. M. and Knutti, R.: Observed heavy precipitation increase
confirms theory and early models, Nat. Clim. Change, 6, 986–991,
https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3110, 2016.
Gelman, A. and Rubin, D. B.: Inference from Iterative Simulation Using
Multiple Sequences, Stat. Sci., 7, 457–472, https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177011136, 1992.
Ghiggi, G., Humphrey, V., Seneviratne, S. I., and Gudmundsson, L.: GRUN: an observation-based global gridded runoff dataset from 1902 to 2014, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, 1655–1674, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1655-2019, 2019a.
Ghiggi, G., Gudmundsson, L., and Humphrey, V.: G-RUN: Global Runoff Reconstruction, figshare [data set], https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.9228176.v2, 2019b.
Giuntoli, I., Villarini, G., Prudhomme, C., and Hannah, D. M.: Uncertainties
in projected runoff over the conterminous United States, Climatic Change,
150, 149–162, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2280-5, 2018.
Golaz, J.-C., Caldwell, P. M., Van Roekel, L. P., Petersen, M. R., Tang, Q.,
Wolfe, J. D., Abeshu, G., Anantharaj, V., Asay-Davis, X. S., Bader, D. C.,
Baldwin, S. A., Bisht, G., Bogenschutz, P. A., Branstetter, M., Brunke, M.
A., Brus, S. R., Burrows, S. M., Cameron-Smith, P. J., Donahue, A. S.,
Deakin, M., Easter, R. C., Evans, K. J., Feng, Y., Flanner, M., Foucar, J.
G., Fyke, J. G., Griffin, B. M., Hannay, C., Harrop, B. E., Hoffman, M. J.,
Hunke, E. C., Jacob, R. L., Jacobsen, D. W., Jeffery, N., Jones, P. W.,
Keen, N. D., Klein, S. A., Larson, V. E., Leung, L. R., Li, H.-Y., Lin, W.,
Lipscomb, W. H., Ma, P.-L., Mahajan, S., Maltrud, M. E., Mametjanov, A.,
McClean, J. L., McCoy, R. B., Neale, R. B., Price, S. F., Qian, Y., Rasch,
P. J., Reeves Eyre, J. E. J., Riley, W. J., Ringler, T. D., Roberts, A. F.,
Roesler, E. L., Salinger, A. G., Shaheen, Z., Shi, X., Singh, B., Tang, J.,
Taylor, M. A., Thornton, P. E., Turner, A. K., Veneziani, M., Wan, H., Wang,
H., Wang, S., Williams, D. N., Wolfram, P. J., Worley, P. H., Xie, S., Yang,
Y., Yoon, J.-H., Zelinka, M. D., Zender, C. S., Zeng, X., Zhang, C., Zhang,
K., Zhang, Y., Zheng, X., Zhou, T., and Zhu, Q.: The DOE E3SM Coupled Model
Version 1: Overview and Evaluation at Standard Resolution, J. Adv. Model. Earth
Sy., 11, 2089–2129, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001603, 2019.
Gong, W., Duan, Q., Li, J., Wang, C., Di, Z., Dai, Y., Ye, A., and Miao, C.: Multi-objective parameter optimization of common land model using adaptive surrogate modeling, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 2409–2425, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-2409-2015, 2015.
Gosling, S., Müller Schmied, H., Betts, R. A., Chang, J., Ciais, P.,
Dankers, R., Döll, P., Eisner, S., Flörke, M., Gerten, D.,
Grillakis, M., Hanasaki, N., Hagemann, S., Huang, M., Huang, Z., Jerez, S.,
Kim, H., Koutroulis, A., Leng, G., Liu, X., Masaki, Y., Montavez, P.,
Morfopoulos, C., Oki, T., Papadimitriou, L., Pokhrel, Y., Portmann, F. T.,
Orth, R., Ostberg, S., Satoh, Y., Seneviratne, S., Sommer, P., Stacke, T.,
Tang, Q., Tsanis, I., Wada, Y., Zhou, T., Büchner, M., Schewe, J., and
Zhao, F.: ISIMIP2a Simulation Data from Water (global) Sector (V. 1.1), GFZ
Data Services [data set], https://doi.org/10.5880/PIK.2019.003,
2019.
Gosling, S. N. and Arnell, N. W.: Simulating current global river runoff
with a global hydrological model: model revisions, validation, and
sensitivity analysis, Hydrol. Process., 25, 1129–1145, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7727, 2011.
Gudmundsson, L., Do, H. X., Leonard, M., and Westra, S.: The Global Streamflow Indices and Metadata Archive (GSIM) – Part 2: Quality control, time-series indices and homogeneity assessment, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 787–804, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-787-2018, 2018.
Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., and Yapo, P. O.: Toward improved calibration
of hydrologic models: Multiple and noncommensurable measures of information,
Water Resour. Res., 34, 751–763, https://doi.org/10.1029/97WR03495, 1998.
Gupta, H. V., Kling, H., Yilmaz, K. K., and Martinez, G. F.: Decomposition
of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for
improving hydrological modelling, J. Hydrol., 377, 80–91, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003, 2009.
Haario, H., Saksman, E., and Tamminen, J.: An adaptive Metropolis algorithm,
Bernoulli, 7, 223–242, 2001.
Haarsma, R. J., Roberts, M. J., Vidale, P. L., Senior, C. A., Bellucci, A., Bao, Q., Chang, P., Corti, S., Fučkar, N. S., Guemas, V., von Hardenberg, J., Hazeleger, W., Kodama, C., Koenigk, T., Leung, L. R., Lu, J., Luo, J.-J., Mao, J., Mizielinski, M. S., Mizuta, R., Nobre, P., Satoh, M., Scoccimarro, E., Semmler, T., Small, J., and von Storch, J.-S.: High Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP v1.0) for CMIP6, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 4185–4208, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-4185-2016, 2016.
Haddeland, I., Clark, D. B., Franssen, W., Ludwig, F., Voß, F., Arnell,
N. W., Bertrand, N., Best, M., Folwell, S., and Gerten, D.: Multimodel
estimate of the global terrestrial water balance: setup and first results, J.
Hydrometeorol., 12, 869–884, 2011.
Hall, J. W., Grey, D., Garrick, D., Fung, F., Brown, C., Dadson, S. J., and
Sadoff, C. W.: Coping with the curse of freshwater variability, Science,
346, 429–430, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1257890, 2014.
Hintze, J. and Nelson, R.: Violin plots: A box plot-density trace
synergism, Am. Stat., 52, 181–184, 1998.
Hirabayashi, Y., Mahendran, R., Koirala, S., Konoshima, L., Yamazaki, D.,
Watanabe, S., Kim, H., and Kanae, S.: Global flood risk under climate
change, Nat. Clim. Change, 3, 816–821, https://doi.org/10.1038/Nclimate1911, 2013.
Hou, Z., Huang, M., Leung, L. R., Lin, G., and Ricciuto, D. M.: Sensitivity
of surface flux simulations to hydrologic parameters based on an uncertainty
quantification framework applied to the Community Land Model, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D15108, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017521, 2012.
Huang, M., Hou, Z., Leung, L. R., Ke, Y., Liu, Y., Fang, Z., and Sun, Y.:
Uncertainty Analysis of Runoff Simulations and Parameter Identifiability in
the Community Land Model: Evidence from MOPEX Basins, J. Hydrometeorol., 14,
1754–1772, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-12-0138.1, 2013.
Huang, M., Ray, J., Hou, Z., Ren, H., Liu, Y., and Swiler, L.: On the
applicability of surrogate-based Markov chain Monte Carlo-Bayesian inversion
to the Community Land Model: Case studies at flux tower sites, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 7548–7563, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024339, 2016.
Ivanov, V. Y., Xu, D., Dwelle, M. C., Sargsyan, K., Wright, D. B.,
Katopodes, N., Kim, J., Tran, V. N., Warnock, A., Fatichi, S., Burlando, P.,
Caporali, E., Restrepo, P., Sanders, B. F., Chaney, M. M., Nunes, A. M. B.,
Nardi, F., Vivoni, E. R., Istanbulluoglu, E., Bisht, G., and Bras, R. L.:
Breaking Down the Computational Barriers to Real-Time Urban Flood
Forecasting, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL093585, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093585, 2021.
Jenicek, M. and Ledvinka, O.: Importance of snowmelt contribution to seasonal runoff and summer low flows in Czechia, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3475–3491, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3475-2020, 2020.
Jung, M., Koirala, S., Weber, U., Ichii, K., Gans, F., Camps-Valls, G.,
Papale, D., Schwalm, C., Tramontana, G., and Reichstein, M.: The FLUXCOM
ensemble of global land-atmosphere energy fluxes, Scientific Data, 6, 1–14,
2019.
Kim, H., Yeh, P. J. F., Oki, T., and Kanae, S.: Role of rivers in the
seasonal variations of terrestrial water storage over global basins, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 36, L17402, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL039006, 2009.
Knoben, W. J. M., Freer, J. E., and Woods, R. A.: Technical note: Inherent benchmark or not? Comparing Nash–Sutcliffe and Kling–Gupta efficiency scores, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4323–4331, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4323-2019, 2019.
Knutti, R. and Sedláèek, J.: Robustness and uncertainties in the new
CMIP5 climate model projections, Nat. Clim. Change, 3, 369–373,
https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1716, 2012.
Knutti, R., Furrer, R., Tebaldi, C., Cermak, J., and Meehl, G. A.:
Challenges in Combining Projections from Multiple Climate Models, J. Climate,
23, 2739–2758, 2010.
Krysanova, V., Zaherpour, J., Didovets, I., Gosling, S. N., Gerten, D.,
Hanasaki, N., Müller Schmied, H., Pokhrel, Y., Satoh, Y., Tang, Q., and
Wada, Y.: How evaluation of global hydrological models can help to improve
credibility of river discharge projections under climate change, Climatic
Change, 163, 1353–1377, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02840-0, 2020.
Laloy, E. and Jacques, D.: Emulation of CPU-demanding reactive transport
models: a comparison of Gaussian processes, polynomial chaos expansion, and
deep neural networks, Comput. Geosci., 23, 1193–1215, 2019.
Lawrence, D. M., Oleson, K. W., Flanner, M. G., Thornton, P. E., Swenson, S.
C., Lawrence, P. J., Zeng, X., Yang, Z.-L., Levis, S., Sakaguchi, K., Bonan,
G. B., and Slater, A. G.: Parameterization improvements and functional and
structural advances in Version 4 of the Community Land Model, J. Adv. Model.
Earth Sy., 3, M03001, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011MS00045, 2011.
Lehner, F., Wood, A. W., Vano, J. A., Lawrence, D. M., Clark, M. P., and
Mankin, J. S.: The potential to reduce uncertainty in regional runoff
projections from climate models, Nat. Clim. Change, 9, 926–933,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0639-x, 2019.
Lehner, F., Deser, C., Maher, N., Marotzke, J., Fischer, E. M., Brunner, L., Knutti, R., and Hawkins, E.: Partitioning climate projection uncertainty with multiple large ensembles and CMIP5/6, Earth Syst. Dynam., 11, 491–508, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-491-2020, 2020.
Leung, L. R., Bader, D. C., Taylor, M. A., and McCoy, R. B.: An Introduction
to the E3SM Special Collection: Goals, Science Drivers, Development, and
Analysis, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2019MS001821, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001821, 2020.
Li, H.-Y., Leung, L. R., Getirana, A., Huang, M., Wu, H., Xu, Y., Guo, J.,
and Voisin, N.: Evaluating Global Streamflow Simulations by a Physically
Based Routing Model Coupled with the Community Land Model, J. Hydrometeorol.,
16, 948–971, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-14-0079.1, 2015.
Liao, C., Zhou, T., Xu, D., Barnes, R., Bisht, G., Li, H.-Y., Tan, Z.,
Tesfa, T., Duan, Z., Engwirda, D., and Leung, L. R.: Advances in hexagon
mesh-based flow direction modeling, Adv. Water Resour., 160, 104099,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2021.104099, 2022.
Lin, G. and Karniadakis, G. E.: Sensitivity analysis and stochastic
simulations of non-equilibrium plasma flow, Int. J.
Numer. Meth. Eng., 80, 738–766, https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.2582, 2009.
Lu, D., Ricciuto, D., Stoyanov, M., and Gu, L.: Calibration of the E3SM Land
Model Using Surrogate-Based Global Optimization, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 10,
1337–1356, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS001134, 2018.
Martens, B., Miralles, D. G., Lievens, H., van der Schalie, R., de Jeu, R. A. M., Fernández-Prieto, D., Beck, H. E., Dorigo, W. A., and Verhoest, N. E. C.: GLEAM v3: satellite-based land evaporation and root-zone soil moisture, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1903–1925, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1903-2017, 2017.
Milliman, J. D., Farnsworth, K. L., Jones, P. D., Xu, K. H., and Smith, L.
C.: Climatic and anthropogenic factors affecting river discharge to the
global ocean, 1951–2000, Global Planet. Change, 62, 187–194,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2008.03.001, 2008.
Milly, P. C. D., Wetherald, R. T., Dunne, K. A., and Delworth, T. L.:
Increasing risk of great floods in a changing climate, Nature, 415, 514–517,
https://doi.org/10.1038/415514a, 2002.
Milly, P. C. D., Betancourt, J., Falkenmark, M., Hirsch, R. M., Kundzewicz,
Z. W., Lettenmaier, D. P., and Stouffer, R. J.: Stationarity Is Dead:
Whither Water Management?, Science, 319, 573–574, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1151915,
2008.
Mishra, A. K. and Singh, V. P.: A review of drought concepts, J. Hydrol., 391,
202–216, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.012, 2010.
Mortatti, J., Moraes, J., Rodrigues, J., Victoria, R., and Martinelli, L.:
Hydrograph separation of the Amazon River using 18O as an isotopic tracer,
Sci. Agr., 54, 167–173, 1997.
Müller, J., Paudel, R., Shoemaker, C. A., Woodbury, J., Wang, Y., and Mahowald, N.: CH4 parameter estimation in CLM4.5bgc using surrogate global optimization, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 3285–3310, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3285-2015, 2015.
Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V.: River flow forecasting through conceptual
models part I – A discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10, 282–290,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6, 1970.
Niu, G.-Y., Yang, Z.-L., Dickinson, R. E., and Gulden, L. E.: A simple
TOPMODEL-based runoff parameterization (SIMTOP) for use in global climate
models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D21106, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006111, 2005.
Oleson, K., Lawrence, D. M., Bonan, G. B., Drewniak, B., Huang, M., Koven,
C. D., Levis, S., Li, F., Riley, W. J., Subin, Z. M., Swenson, S., Thornton,
P. E., Bozbiyik, A., Fisher, R., Heald, C. L., Kluzek, E., Lamarque, J.-F.,
Lawrence, P. J., Leung, L. R., Lipscomb, W., Muszala, S. P., Ricciuto, D.
M., Sacks, W. J., Sun, Y., Tang, J., and Yang, Z.-L.: Technical description
of version 4.5 of the Community Land Model (CLM) (No. NCAR/TN-503+STR), UCAR, https://doi.org/10.5065/D6RR1W7M, 2013.
Olson, R., Fan, Y. A., and Evans, J. P.: A simple method for Bayesian model
averaging of regional climate model projections: Application to southeast
Australian temperatures, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 7661–7669,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016gl069704, 2016.
Pekel, J.-F., Cottam, A., Gorelick, N., and Belward, A. S.: High-resolution
mapping of global surface water and its long-term changes, Nature, 540,
418–422, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20584, 2016.
Pilgrim, D. H., Chapman, T. G., and Doran, D. G.: Problems of
rainfall-runoff modelling in arid and semiarid regions, Hydrolog.
Sci. J., 33, 379–400, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626668809491261, 1988.
Ray, J., Hou, Z., Huang, M., Sargsyan, K., and Swiler, L.: Bayesian
Calibration of the Community Land Model Using Surrogates, SIAM/ASA Journal
on Uncertainty Quantification, 3, 199–233, https://doi.org/10.1137/140957998, 2015.
Razavi, S., Tolson, B. A., and Burn, D. H.: Review of surrogate modeling in
water resources, Water Resour. Res., 48, W07401, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011527, 2012.
Ricciuto, D., Sargsyan, K., and Thornton, P.: The Impact of Parametric
Uncertainties on Biogeochemistry in the E3SM Land Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth
Sy., 10, 297–319, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017ms000962, 2018.
Rodell, M., Beaudoing, H. K., L'Ecuyer, T., Olson, W. S., Famiglietti, J.
S., Houser, P. R., Adler, R., Bosilovich, M. G., Clayson, C. A., and
Chambers, D.: The observed state of the water cycle in the early
twenty-first century, J. Climate, 28, 8289–8318, 2015.
Sargsyan, K., Safta, C., Najm, H. N., Debusschere, B. J., Ricciuto, D., and
Thornton, P.: Dimensionality Reduction for Complex Models Via Bayesian
Compressive Sensing, Int. J. Uncertain. Quan., 4, 63–93, 2014.
Sargsyan, K., Najm, H. N., and Ghanem, R.: On the Statistical Calibration of
Physical Models, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 47, 246–276,
https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.20906, 2015.
Schellekens, J., Dutra, E., Martínez-de la Torre, A., Balsamo, G., van Dijk, A., Sperna Weiland, F., Minvielle, M., Calvet, J.-C., Decharme, B., Eisner, S., Fink, G., Flörke, M., Peßenteiner, S., van Beek, R., Polcher, J., Beck, H., Orth, R., Calton, B., Burke, S., Dorigo, W., and Weedon, G. P.: A global water resources ensemble of hydrological models: the eartH2Observe Tier-1 dataset, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 9, 389–413, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-389-2017, 2017.
Schewe, J., Heinke, J., Gerten, D., Haddeland, I., Arnell, N. W., Clark, D.
B., Dankers, R., Eisner, S., Fekete, B. M., Colón-González, F. J.,
Gosling, S. N., Kim, H., Liu, X., Masaki, Y., Portmann, F. T., Satoh, Y.,
Stacke, T., Tang, Q., Wada, Y., Wisser, D., Albrecht, T., Frieler, K.,
Piontek, F., Warszawski, L., and Kabat, P.: Multimodel assessment of water
scarcity under climate change, P. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA, 111, 3245–3250, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222460110, 2014.
Sen, P. K.: Estimates of the Regression Coefficient Based on Kendall's Tau,
J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 63, 1379–1389, https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1968.10480934, 1968.
Seyoum, W. M., Kwon, D., and Milewski, A. M.: Downscaling GRACE TWSA Data
into High-Resolution Groundwater Level Anomaly Using Machine Learning-Based
Models in a Glacial Aquifer System, Remote Sens., 11, 824, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11070824, 2019.
Sheng, M., Lei, H., Jiao, Y., and Yang, D.: Evaluation of the Runoff and
River Routing Schemes in the Community Land Model of the Yellow River Basin,
J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 9, 2993–3018, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS001026, 2017.
Sobol', I. M.: Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models
and their Monte Carlo estimates, Math. Comput. Simulat.,
55, 271–280, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4754(00)00270-6,
2001.
Sun, Y., Hou, Z., Huang, M., Tian, F., and Ruby Leung, L.: Inverse modeling of hydrologic parameters using surface flux and runoff observations in the Community Land Model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 4995–5011, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4995-2013, 2013.
Swenson, S. C., Lawrence, D. M., and Lee, H.: Improved simulation of the
terrestrial hydrological cycle in permafrost regions by the Community Land
Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 4, M08002, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012MS000165, 2012.
Swenson, S. C., Clark, M., Fan, Y., Lawrence, D. M., and Perket, J.:
Representing Intrahillslope Lateral Subsurface Flow in the Community Land
Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 11, 4044–4065, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001833, 2019.
Tan, Z., Leung, L. R., Li, H.-Y., Tesfa, T., Zhu, Q., and Huang, M.: A
substantial role of soil erosion in the land carbon sink and its future
changes, Glob. Change Biol., 26, 2642–2655, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14982, 2020.
Tebaldi, C., Smith, R. L., Nychka, D., and Mearns, L. O.: Quantifying
uncertainty in projections of regional climate change: A Bayesian approach
to the analysis of multimodel ensembles, J. Climate, 18, 1524–1540, 2005.
Tesfa, T. K., Leung, L. R., and Ghan, S. J.: Exploring Topography-Based
Methods for Downscaling Subgrid Precipitation for Use in Earth System
Models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD031456,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031456, 2020.
Toure, A. M., Luojus, K., Rodell, M., Beaudoing, H., and Getirana, A.:
Evaluation of Simulated Snow and Snowmelt Timing in the Community Land Model
Using Satellite-Based Products and Streamflow Observations, J. Adv. Model.
Earth Sy., 10, 2933–2951, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001389,
2018.
Trenberth, K. E.: Changes in precipitation with climate change, Clim. Res.,
47, 123–138, 2011.
Troy, T. J., Wood, E. F., and Sheffield, J.: An efficient calibration method
for continental-scale land surface modeling, Water Resour. Res., 44, W09411,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006513, 2008.
Tsai, W.-P., Feng, D., Pan, M., Beck, H., Lawson, K., Yang, Y., Liu, J., and
Shen, C.: From calibration to parameter learning: Harnessing the scaling
effects of big data in geoscientific modeling, Nat. Commun., 12,
5988, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26107-z, 2021.
Vörösmarty, C. J., Green, P., Salisbury, J., and Lammers, R. B.:
Global Water Resources: Vulnerability from Climate Change and Population
Growth, Science, 289, 284–288, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5477.284, 2000.
Wang, C., Duan, Q., Gong, W., Ye, A., Di, Z., and Miao, C.: An evaluation of
adaptive surrogate modeling based optimization with two benchmark problems,
Environ. Modell. Softw., 60, 167–179, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.05.026, 2014.
Warszawski, L., Frieler, K., Huber, V., Piontek, F., Serdeczny, O., and
Schewe, J.: The Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project
(ISI–MIP): Project framework, P. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA, 111, 3228–3232, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1312330110, 2014.
Wu, H., Kimball, J. S., Mantua, N., and Stanford, J.: Automated upscaling of
river networks for macroscale hydrological modeling, Water Resour. Res., 47, W03517,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008871, 2011.
Xie, Z., Yuan, F., Duan, Q., Zheng, J., Liang, M., and Chen, F.: Regional
Parameter Estimation of the VIC Land Surface Model: Methodology and
Application to River Basins in China, J. Hydrometeorol., 8, 447–468,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM568.1, 2007.
Xiu, D. and Karniadakis, G. E.: The Wiener–Askey Polynomial Chaos for
Stochastic Differential Equations, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 24,
619–644, https://doi.org/10.1137/S1064827501387826, 2002.
Xu, D.: Code for “Using an Uncertainty Quantification Framework to Calibrate the Runoff Generation Scheme in E3SM Land Model V1”, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5815500, 2022a.
Xu, D.: Data for “Using an Uncertainty Quantification Framework to Calibrate the Runoff Generation Scheme in E3SM Land Model V1”, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5815730, 2022b.
Xu, D., Ivanov, V. Y., Kim, J., and Fatichi, S.: On the use of observations
in assessment of multi-model climate ensemble, Stoch. Env.
Res. Risk A., 33, 1923–1937, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-018-1621-2,
2019.
Xu, D., Ivanov, V. Y., Li, X., and Troy, T. J.: Peak Runoff Timing is Linked
to Global Warming Trajectories, Earths Future, 9, e2021EF002083,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002083, 2021a.
Xu, D., Bisht, G., Zhou, T., Leung, L. R., and Pan, M.: Development of
Land-River Two-Way Coupling in the Energy Exascale Earth System Model, Earth
and Space Science Open Archive [preprint], https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10507802.2, 2021b.
Yang, H., Zhou, F., Piao, S. L., Huang, M. T., Chen, A. P., Ciais, P., Li,
Y., Lian, X., Peng, S. S., and Zeng, Z. Z.: Regional patterns of future
runoff changes from Earth system models constrained by observation, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 44, 5540–5549, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017gl073454, 2017.
Yang, S. L., Xu, K. H., Milliman, J. D., Yang, H. F., and Wu, C. S.: Decline
of Yangtze River water and sediment discharge: Impact from natural and
anthropogenic changes, Sci. Rep.-UK, 5, 12581, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep12581,
2015.
Zhang, Y., Zheng, H., Chiew, F. H. S., Arancibia, J. P. A., and Zhou, X.:
Evaluating Regional and Global Hydrological Models against Streamflow and
Evapotranspiration Measurements, J. Hydrometeorol., 17, 995–1010,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-15-0107.1, 2016.
Zhou, T., Leung, L. R., Leng, G., Voisin, N., Li, H.-Y., Craig, A. P.,
Tesfa, T., and Mao, Y.: Global Irrigation Characteristics and Effects
Simulated by Fully Coupled Land Surface, River, and Water Management Models
in E3SM, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2020MS002069, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002069, 2020.
Short summary
The runoff outputs in Earth system model simulations involve high uncertainty, which needs to be constrained by parameter calibration. In this work, we used a surrogate-assisted Bayesian framework to efficiently calibrate the runoff-generation processes in the Energy Exascale Earth System Model v1 at a global scale. The model performance was improved compared to the default parameter after calibration, and the associated parametric uncertainty was significantly constrained.
The runoff outputs in Earth system model simulations involve high uncertainty, which needs to be...
