Articles | Volume 15, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4991-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4991-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Model description paper
| 
29 Jun 2022
Model description paper |
| 29 Jun 2022
| 29 Jun 2022
TIM: modelling pathways to meet Ireland's long-term energy system challenges with the TIMES-Ireland Model (v1.0)
Energy Policy and Modelling Group, MaREI, the SFI Research Centre for Energy, Climate and Marine, Environmental Research Institute, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
School of Engineering and Architecture, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
James Glynn
Energy Policy and Modelling Group, MaREI, the SFI Research Centre for Energy, Climate and Marine, Environmental Research Institute, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
School of Engineering and Architecture, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
Center on Global Energy Policy, School of International and Public Affairs, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
Vahid Aryanpur
Energy Policy and Modelling Group, MaREI, the SFI Research Centre for Energy, Climate and Marine, Environmental Research Institute, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
School of Engineering and Architecture, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
Ankita Gaur
Energy Policy and Modelling Group, MaREI, the SFI Research Centre for Energy, Climate and Marine, Environmental Research Institute, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
School of Engineering and Architecture, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
Jason McGuire
Energy Policy and Modelling Group, MaREI, the SFI Research Centre for Energy, Climate and Marine, Environmental Research Institute, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
School of Engineering and Architecture, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
Andrew Smith
Energy Policy and Modelling Group, MaREI, the SFI Research Centre for Energy, Climate and Marine, Environmental Research Institute, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
School of Engineering and Architecture, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
Xiufeng Yue
Energy Policy and Modelling Group, MaREI, the SFI Research Centre for Energy, Climate and Marine, Environmental Research Institute, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
School of Engineering and Architecture, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
Institute of Tourism and Environment, School of Economics and Management, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian City, Liaoning, China
Hannah Daly
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Energy Policy and Modelling Group, MaREI, the SFI Research Centre for Energy, Climate and Marine, Environmental Research Institute, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
School of Engineering and Architecture, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
Related subject area
Integrated assessment modeling
GCAM–GLORY v1.0: representing global reservoir water storage in a multi-sector human–Earth system model
CLASH – Climate-responsive Land Allocation model with carbon Storage and Harvests
Carbon Monitor Power-Simulators (CMP-SIM v1.0) across countries: a data-driven approach to simulate daily power generation
Intercomparison of multiple two-way coupled meteorology and air quality models (WRF v4.1.1–CMAQ v5.3.1, WRF–Chem v4.1.1, and WRF v3.7.1–CHIMERE v2020r1) in eastern China
MESSAGEix-GLOBIOM nexus module: integrating water sector and climate impacts
Minimum-variance-based outlier detection method using forward-search model error in geodetic networks
Modelling long-term industry energy demand and CO2 emissions in the system context using REMIND (version 3.1.0)
Bidirectional coupling of the long-term integrated assessment model REgional Model of INvestments and Development (REMIND) v3.0.0 with the hourly power sector model Dispatch and Investment Evaluation Tool with Endogenous Renewables (DIETER) v1.0.2
GCAM-CDR v1.0: enhancing the representation of carbon dioxide removal technologies and policies in an integrated assessment model
The IPCC Sixth Assessment Report WGIII climate assessment of mitigation pathways: from emissions to global temperatures
Cyclone generation Algorithm including a THERmodynamic module for Integrated National damage Assessment (CATHERINA 1.0) compatible with Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) climate data
A tool for air pollution scenarios (TAPS v1.0) to enable global, long-term, and flexible study of climate and air quality policies
Improved CASA model based on satellite remote sensing data: simulating net primary productivity of Qinghai Lake basin alpine grassland
Pixel-level parameter optimization of a terrestrial biosphere model for improving estimation of carbon fluxes with an efficient model–data fusion method and satellite-derived LAI and GPP data
Climate Services Toolbox (CSTools) v4.0: from climate forecasts to climate forecast information
ANEMI_Yangtze v1.0: a coupled human–natural systems model for the Yangtze Economic Belt – model description
Nested leave-two-out cross-validation for the optimal crop yield model selection
GCAM-USA v5.3_water_dispatch: integrated modeling of subnational US energy, water, and land systems within a global framework
GOBLIN version 1.0: a land balance model to identify national agriculture and land use pathways to climate neutrality via backcasting
Globally consistent assessment of economic impacts of wildfires in CLIMADA v2.2
REMIND2.1: transformation and innovation dynamics of the energy-economic system within climate and sustainability limits
Parallel gridded simulation framework for DSSAT-CSM (version 4.7.5.21) using MPI and NetCDF
Estimating global land system impacts of timber plantations using MAgPIE 4.3.5
Mengqi Zhao, Thomas B. Wild, Neal T. Graham, Son H. Kim, Matthew Binsted, A. F. M. Kamal Chowdhury, Siwa Msangi, Pralit L. Patel, Chris R. Vernon, Hassan Niazi, Hong-Yi Li, and Guta W. Abeshu
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5587–5617, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5587-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5587-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Change Analysis Model (GCAM) simulates the world’s climate–land–energy–water system interactions , but its reservoir representation is limited. We developed the GLObal Reservoir Yield (GLORY) model to provide GCAM with information on the cost of supplying water based on reservoir construction costs, climate and demand conditions, and reservoir expansion potential. GLORY enhances our understanding of future reservoir capacity needs to meet human demands in a changing climate.
Tommi Ekholm, Nadine-Cyra Freistetter, Aapo Rautiainen, and Laura Thölix
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3041–3062, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3041-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3041-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
CLASH is a numerical model that portrays land allocation between different uses, land carbon stocks, and agricultural and forestry production globally. CLASH can help in examining the role of land use in mitigating climate change, providing food and biogenic raw materials for the economy, and conserving primary ecosystems. Our demonstration with CLASH confirms that reduction of animal-based food, shifting croplands and storing carbon in forests are effective ways to mitigate climate change.
Léna Gurriaran, Yannig Goude, Katsumasa Tanaka, Biqing Zhu, Zhu Deng, Xuanren Song, and Philippe Ciais
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2663–2682, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2663-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2663-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a data-driven model simulating daily regional power demand based on climate and socioeconomic variables. Our model was applied to eight countries or regions (Australia, Brazil, China, EU, India, Russia, South Africa, US), identifying influential factors and their relationship with power demand. Our findings highlight the significance of economic indicators in addition to temperature, showcasing country-specific variations. This research aids energy planning and emission reduction.
Chao Gao, Xuelei Zhang, Aijun Xiu, Qingqing Tong, Hongmei Zhao, Shichun Zhang, Guangyi Yang, Mengduo Zhang, and Shengjin Xie
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2471–2492, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2471-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2471-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A comprehensive comparison study is conducted targeting the performances of three two-way coupled meteorology and air quality models (WRF-CMAQ, WRF-Chem, and WRF-CHIMERE) for eastern China during 2017. The impacts of aerosol–radiation–cloud interactions on these models’ results are evaluated against satellite and surface observations. Further improvements to the calculation of aerosol–cloud interactions in these models are crucial to ensure more accurate and timely air quality forecasts.
Muhammad Awais, Adriano Vinca, Edward Byers, Stefan Frank, Oliver Fricko, Esther Boere, Peter Burek, Miguel Poblete Cazenave, Paul Natsuo Kishimoto, Alessio Mastrucci, Yusuke Satoh, Amanda Palazzo, Madeleine McPherson, Keywan Riahi, and Volker Krey
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2447–2469, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2447-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2447-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Climate change, population growth, and depletion of natural resources all pose complex and interconnected challenges. Our research offers a novel model that can help in understanding the interplay of these aspects, providing policymakers with a more robust tool for making informed future decisions. The study highlights the significance of incorporating climate impacts within large-scale global integrated assessments, which can help us in generating more climate-resilient scenarios.
Utkan M. Durdağ
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2187–2196, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2187-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2187-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study introduces a novel approach to outlier detection in geodetic networks, challenging conventional and robust methods. By treating outliers as unknown parameters within the Gauss–Markov model and exploring numerous outlier combinations, this approach prioritizes minimal variance and eliminates iteration dependencies. The mean success rate (MSR) comparisons highlight its effectiveness, improving the MSR by 40–45 % for multiple outliers.
Michaja Pehl, Felix Schreyer, and Gunnar Luderer
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2015–2038, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2015-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2015-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We extend the REMIND model (used to investigate climate mitigation strategies) by an industry module that represents cement, chemical, steel, and other industries. We also present a method for deriving scenarios of industry subsector activity and energy demand, consistent with established socioeconomic scenarios, allowing us to investigate the different climate change mitigation challenges and strategies in industry subsectors in the context of the entire energy–economy–climate system.
Chen Chris Gong, Falko Ueckerdt, Robert Pietzcker, Adrian Odenweller, Wolf-Peter Schill, Martin Kittel, and Gunnar Luderer
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4977–5033, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4977-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4977-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
To mitigate climate change, the global economy must drastically reduce its greenhouse gas emissions, for which the power sector plays a key role. Until now, long-term models which simulate this transformation cannot always accurately depict the power sector due to a lack of resolution. Our work bridges this gap by linking a long-term model to an hourly model. The result is an almost full harmonization of the models in generating a power sector mix until 2100 with hourly resolution.
David R. Morrow, Raphael Apeaning, and Garrett Guard
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1105–1118, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1105-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1105-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
GCAM-CDR is a variant of the Global Change Analysis Model that makes it easier to study the roles that carbon dioxide removal (CDR) might play in climate policy. Building on GCAM 5.4, GCAM-CDR adds several extra technologies to permanently remove carbon dioxide from the air and enables users to simulate a wider range of CDR-related policies and controls.
Jarmo S. Kikstra, Zebedee R. J. Nicholls, Christopher J. Smith, Jared Lewis, Robin D. Lamboll, Edward Byers, Marit Sandstad, Malte Meinshausen, Matthew J. Gidden, Joeri Rogelj, Elmar Kriegler, Glen P. Peters, Jan S. Fuglestvedt, Ragnhild B. Skeie, Bjørn H. Samset, Laura Wienpahl, Detlef P. van Vuuren, Kaj-Ivar van der Wijst, Alaa Al Khourdajie, Piers M. Forster, Andy Reisinger, Roberto Schaeffer, and Keywan Riahi
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 9075–9109, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-9075-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-9075-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Assessing hundreds or thousands of emission scenarios in terms of their global mean temperature implications requires standardised procedures of infilling, harmonisation, and probabilistic temperature assessments. We here present the open-source
climate-assessmentworkflow that was used in the IPCC AR6 Working Group III report. The paper provides key insight for anyone wishing to understand the assessment of climate outcomes of mitigation pathways in the context of the Paris Agreement.
Théo Le Guenedal, Philippe Drobinski, and Peter Tankov
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8001–8039, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8001-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8001-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The CATHERINA model produces simulations of cyclone-related annualized damage costs at a country level from climate data and open-source socioeconomic indicators. The framework couples statistical and physical modeling of tropical cyclones to bridge the gap between general circulation and integrated assessment models providing a precise description of tropical-cyclone-related damages.
William Atkinson, Sebastian D. Eastham, Y.-H. Henry Chen, Jennifer Morris, Sergey Paltsev, C. Adam Schlosser, and Noelle E. Selin
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7767–7789, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7767-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7767-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding policy effects on human-caused air pollutant emissions is key for assessing related health impacts. We develop a flexible scenario tool that combines updated emissions data sets, long-term economic modeling, and comprehensive technology pathways to clarify the impacts of climate and air quality policies. Results show the importance of both policy levers in the future to prevent long-term emission increases from offsetting near-term air quality improvements from existing policies.
Chengyong Wu, Kelong Chen, Chongyi E, Xiaoni You, Dongcai He, Liangbai Hu, Baokang Liu, Runke Wang, Yaya Shi, Chengxiu Li, and Fumei Liu
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6919–6933, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6919-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6919-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The traditional Carnegie–Ames–Stanford Approach (CASA) model driven by multisource data such as meteorology, soil, and remote sensing (RS) has notable disadvantages. We drove the CASA using RS data and conducted a case study of the Qinghai Lake basin alpine grassland. The simulated result is similar to published and measured net primary productivity (NPP). It may provide a reference for simulating vegetation NPP to satisfy the requirements of accounting carbon stocks and other applications.
Rui Ma, Jingfeng Xiao, Shunlin Liang, Han Ma, Tao He, Da Guo, Xiaobang Liu, and Haibo Lu
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6637–6657, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6637-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6637-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Parameter optimization can improve the accuracy of modeled carbon fluxes. Few studies conducted pixel-level parameterization because it requires a high computational cost. Our paper used high-quality spatial products to optimize parameters at the pixel level, and also used the machine learning method to improve the speed of optimization. The results showed that there was significant spatial variability of parameters and we also improved the spatial pattern of carbon fluxes.
Núria Pérez-Zanón, Louis-Philippe Caron, Silvia Terzago, Bert Van Schaeybroeck, Llorenç Lledó, Nicolau Manubens, Emmanuel Roulin, M. Carmen Alvarez-Castro, Lauriane Batté, Pierre-Antoine Bretonnière, Susana Corti, Carlos Delgado-Torres, Marta Domínguez, Federico Fabiano, Ignazio Giuntoli, Jost von Hardenberg, Eroteida Sánchez-García, Verónica Torralba, and Deborah Verfaillie
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6115–6142, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6115-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6115-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
CSTools (short for Climate Service Tools) is an R package that contains process-based methods for climate forecast calibration, bias correction, statistical and stochastic downscaling, optimal forecast combination, and multivariate verification, as well as basic and advanced tools to obtain tailored products. In addition to describing the structure and methods in the package, we also present three use cases to illustrate the seasonal climate forecast post-processing for specific purposes.
Haiyan Jiang, Slobodan P. Simonovic, and Zhongbo Yu
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4503–4528, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4503-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4503-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Yangtze Economic Belt is one of the most dynamic regions of China. The fast urbanization and strong economic growth in the region pose severe challenges for its sustainable development. To improve our understanding of the interactions among coupled human–natural systems in the Belt and to provide the foundation for science-based policy-making for the sustainable development of the Belt, we developed an integrated system-dynamics-based simulation model (ANEMI_Yangtze) for the Belt.
Thi Lan Anh Dinh and Filipe Aires
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3519–3535, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3519-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3519-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We proposed the leave-two-out method (i.e. one particular implementation of the nested cross-validation) to determine the optimal statistical crop model (using the validation dataset) and estimate its true generalization ability (using the testing dataset). This approach is applied to two examples (robusta coffee in Cu M'gar and grain maize in France). The results suggested that the simple models are more suitable in crop modelling where a limited number of samples is available.
Matthew Binsted, Gokul Iyer, Pralit Patel, Neal T. Graham, Yang Ou, Zarrar Khan, Nazar Kholod, Kanishka Narayan, Mohamad Hejazi, Son Kim, Katherine Calvin, and Marshall Wise
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2533–2559, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2533-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2533-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
GCAM-USA v5.3_water_dispatch is an open-source model that represents key interactions across economic, energy, water, and land systems in a global framework, with subnational detail in the United States. GCAM-USA can be used to explore future changes in demand for (and production of) energy, water, and crops at the state and regional level in the US. This paper describes GCAM-USA and provides four illustrative scenarios to demonstrate the model's capabilities and potential applications.
Colm Duffy, Remi Prudhomme, Brian Duffy, James Gibbons, Cathal O'Donoghue, Mary Ryan, and David Styles
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2239–2264, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2239-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2239-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The GOBLIN (General Overview for a Backcasting approach of Livestock INtensification) model is a new high-resolution integrated
bottom-upbiophysical land use model capable of identifying broad pathways towards climate neutrality in the agriculture, forestry, and other land use (AFOLU) sector. The model is intended to bridge the gap between hindsight representations of national emissions and much larger globally integrated assessment models.
Samuel Lüthi, Gabriela Aznar-Siguan, Christopher Fairless, and David N. Bresch
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 7175–7187, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7175-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7175-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In light of the dramatic increase in economic impacts due to wildfires, the need for modelling impacts of wildfire damage is ever increasing. Insurance companies, households, humanitarian organisations and governmental authorities are worried by climate risks. In this study we present an approach to modelling wildfire impacts using the open-source modelling platform CLIMADA. All input data are free, public and globally available, ensuring applicability in data-scarce regions of the Global South.
Lavinia Baumstark, Nico Bauer, Falk Benke, Christoph Bertram, Stephen Bi, Chen Chris Gong, Jan Philipp Dietrich, Alois Dirnaichner, Anastasis Giannousakis, Jérôme Hilaire, David Klein, Johannes Koch, Marian Leimbach, Antoine Levesque, Silvia Madeddu, Aman Malik, Anne Merfort, Leon Merfort, Adrian Odenweller, Michaja Pehl, Robert C. Pietzcker, Franziska Piontek, Sebastian Rauner, Renato Rodrigues, Marianna Rottoli, Felix Schreyer, Anselm Schultes, Bjoern Soergel, Dominika Soergel, Jessica Strefler, Falko Ueckerdt, Elmar Kriegler, and Gunnar Luderer
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6571–6603, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6571-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6571-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents the new and open-source version 2.1 of the REgional Model of INvestments and Development (REMIND) with the aim of improving code documentation and transparency. REMIND is an integrated assessment model (IAM) of the energy-economic system. By answering questions like
Can the world keep global warming below 2 °C?and, if so,
Under what socio-economic conditions and applying what technological options?, it is the goal of REMIND to explore consistent transformation pathways.
Phillip D. Alderman
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6541–6569, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6541-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6541-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper documents a framework for accessing crop model input data directly from spatially referenced file formats and running simulations in parallel across a geographic region using the Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer Cropping Systems Model (a widely used crop model system). The framework greatly reduced the execution time when compared to running the standard version of the model.
Abhijeet Mishra, Florian Humpenöder, Jan Philipp Dietrich, Benjamin Leon Bodirsky, Brent Sohngen, Christopher P. O. Reyer, Hermann Lotze-Campen, and Alexander Popp
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6467–6494, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6467-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6467-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Timber plantations are an increasingly important source of roundwood production, next to harvest from natural forests. However, timber plantations are currently underrepresented in global land-use models. Here, we include timber production and plantations in the MAgPIE modeling framework. This allows one to capture the competition for land between agriculture and forestry. We show that increasing timber plantations in the coming decades partly compete with cropland for limited land resources.
Cited articles
AECOM:
Cost Optimal Calculations and Gap Analysis for Buildings in Ireland under Directive 2010/31/EU on the Energy Performance of Buildings (Recast) Section 1-Residential Buildings, Tech. rep., AECOM, https://assets.gov.ie/100189/eb2d862f-6d19-4578-8dd0-47f1d7cc0d0f.pdf (last access: 18 May 2022), 2013. a
AECOM:
National Transport Model Update: Travel Demand Forecasting Report, Tech. rep., AECOM, Dublin, Ireland, https://www.tii.ie/tii-library/strategic-planning/national-transport-model/NTpM-Vol3-Travel-Demand-Forcasting-Report.pdf (last access: 18 May 2022), 2019. a, b, c, d
Ali, U., Shamsi, M. H., Bohacek, M., Hoare, C., Purcell, K., Mangina, E., and O'Donnell, J.:
A data-driven approach to optimize urban scale energy retrofit decisions for residential buildings, Appl. Energ., 267, 114861, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114861, 2020. a
Antti-L, IEA-ETSAP, and ggiannakidis: etsap-TIMES/TIMES_model: TIMES Version 4.5.8 (v4.5.8), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5537496, 2021. a
Aryanpur, V. and Shafiei, E.:
Transition to alternative fuel vehicles and implications for energy demand and GHG emissions in Iran, Energy and Environment, 26, 863–875, https://doi.org/10.1260/0958-305X.26.5.863, 2015. a
Aryanpur, V., O'Gallachoir, B., Dai, H., Chen, W., and Glynn, J.:
A review of spatial resolution and regionalisation in national-scale energy systems optimisation models, Energy Strateg. Rev., 37, 100702, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2021.100702, 2021. a
Aryanpur, V., Balyk, O., Daly, H., Ó Gallachóir, B., and Glynn, J.:
Decarbonisation of passenger light-duty vehicles using spatially resolved TIMES-Ireland Model, Appl. Energ., 316, 119078, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119078, 2022. a
Balyk, O.:
Timeslice Tool for TIMES models (v0.1.0), Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6564759, 2022. a
Balyk, O., Andersen, K. S., Dockweiler, S., Gargiulo, M., Karlsson, K., Næraa, R., Petrović, S., Tattini, J., Termansen, L. B., and Venturini, G.:
TIMES-DK: Technology-rich multi-sectoral optimisation model of the Danish energy system, Energy Strateg. Rev., 23, 13–22, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2018.11.003, 2019. a
Balyk, O., Glynn, J., Aryanpur, V., Gaur, A., McGuire, J., Smith, A., Yue, X., Chiodi, A., Gargiulo, M., and Daly, H.:
TIMES-Ireland Model (v1.0), Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5708680, 2021. a, b
Bergin, A. and García-Rodríguez, A.:
Regional Demographics and Structural Housing Demand At a County Level, Tech. Rep. 111, The Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin, Ireland, https://doi.org/10.26504/rs111, 2020. a
Carlsson, J., del Mar Perez Fortes, M., de Marco, G., Giuntoli, J., Jakubcionis, M., Jäger-Waldau, A., Lacal-Arantegui, R., Lazarou, S., Magagna, D., Moles, C., Sigfusson, B., Spisto, A., Vallei, M., and Weidner, E.:
Energy Technology Reference Indicator (ETRI) Projections for 2010–2050, Tech. rep., European Commission Joint Resarch Centre, Petten, the Netherlands, https://doi.org/10.2790/057687, 2014. a
CCAC:
Climate Change Advisory Council Annual Review 2020, Tech. rep., Climate Change Advisory Council, Dublin, Ireland, https://www.climatecouncil.ie/media/climatechangeadvisorycouncil/contentassets/publications/CCAC_AnnualReview2020FINAL.pdf(last access: 18 May 2022), 2020. a
Chiodi, A., Donnellan, T., Breen, J., Deane, P., Hanrahan, K., Gargiulo, M., and Ó Gallachóir, B. P.:
Integrating agriculture and energy to assess GHG emissions reduction: a methodological approach, Clim. Policy, 16, 215–236, https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2014.993579, 2016. a, b, c
Collins, M. and Curtis, J.:
Value for money in energy efficiency retrofits in Ireland: grant provider and grant recipients, Appl. Econ., 49, 5245–5267, https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1302068, 2017. a
CSO:
Census of Population 2016 – Profile 2 Population Distribution and Movements, Central Statistics Office (CSO), https://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/ep/p-cp2tc/cp2pdm/ (last access: 18 May 2022), 2017. a
CSO:
Population and Labour Force Projections 2017–2051, Central Statistics Office (CSO), https://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/ep/p-plfp/populationandlabourforceprojections2017-2051/ (last access: 18 May 2022), 2018. a
CSO:
Private Households in Permanent Housing Units 2011 to 2016 (Table E1008), Central Statistics Office (CSO), https://data.cso.ie/table/E1008 (last access: 18 May 2022), 2020a. a
CSO:
Private Households in Permanent Housing Units 2011 to 2016 (Table E1055), Central Statistics Office (CSO), https://data.cso.ie/table/E1055 (last access: 18 May 2022), 2020b. a
CSO:
How We Travelled, in: National Travel Survey 2019, Central Statistics Office (CSO), https://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/ep/p-nts/nationaltravelsurvey2019/howwetravelled/ (last access: 18 May 2022), 2020c. a
CSO:
Projected Population 2016 Based, Central Statistics Office (CSO), https://data.cso.ie/table/pea22 (last access: 18 May 2022), 2020d. a
CSO:
Transport Omnibus 2018: Public Transport, Central Statistics Office (CSO), https://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/ep/p-tranom/transportomnibus2018/publictransport/ (last access: 18 May 2022), 2020e. a
CSO:
Passengers, Freight and Commercial Flights (Table TAA03), Central Statistics Office (CSO), https://data.cso.ie/table/taa03 (last access: 18 May 2022), 2020f. a
CSO:
Road Traffic Volumes of Private Cars (Table THA18), Central Statistics Office (CSO), https://data.cso.ie/table/THA18 (last access: 18 May 2022), 2020j. a
CSO:
Road Traffic Volumes (Table THA17), Central Statistics Office (CSO), https://data.cso.ie/table/THA17 (last access: 18 May 2022), 2020k. a
CSO:
Road Traffic Volumes of Small Public Serviced Vehicle (Table THA20), Central Statistics Office (CSO), https://data.cso.ie/table/THA20 (last access: 18 May 2022), 2020l. a
CSO:
Estimates of Household Income, Central Statistics Office (CSO), https://ws.cso.ie/public/api.restful/PxStat.Data.Cube_API.ReadDataset/CIA02/CSV/1.0/en (last access: 18 May 2022), 2021. a
Daly, H., Smith, A., Aryanpur, V., Gaur, A., McGuire, J., Yue, X., Glynn, J., and Balyk, O.:
Carbon Budget Scenarios for Ireland's Energy System, 2021-50 (v1.0), Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5517363, 2021. a
Daly, H. E. and Ó Gallachóir, B. P.:
Modelling future private car energy demand in Ireland, Energ. Policy, 39, 7815–7824, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.027, 2011. a
Daly, H. E., Scott, K., Strachan, N., and Barrett, J.:
Indirect CO2 Emission Implications of Energy System Pathways: Linking IO and TIMES Models for the UK, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 10701–10709, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b01020, 2015. a
Danish Energy Agency and Energinet: Technology Data – Heating installations, Tech. Rep. 0003, DEA, https://ens.dk/sites/ens.dk/files/Analyser/technology_data_catalogue_for_individual_heating_installations.pdf (last access: 18 May 2022), 2020. a
Dantas, T. M., Cyrino Oliveira, F. L., and Varela Repolho, H. M.:
Air transportation demand forecast through Bagging Holt Winters methods, J. Air Transp. Manag., 59, 116–123, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2016.12.006, 2017. a
Deane, P., Curtis, J., Chiodi, A., Gargiulo, M., Rogan, F., Dineen, D., Glynn, J., FitzGerald, J., Ó Gallachóir, B., DECLG, UCC, and ESRI: Technical support on developing low carbon sector roadmaps for Ireland: Low Carbon Energy Roadmap for Ireland, Tech. Rep. 021, Department of Environment, Community and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland, https://www.esri.ie/system/files?file=media/file-uploads/2015-07/BKMNEXT292.pdf (last access: 18 May 2022), 2013. a
DeCarolis, J., Daly, H., Dodds, P., Keppo, I., Li, F., McDowall, W., Pye, S., Strachan, N., Trutnevyte, E., Usher, W., Winning, M., Yeh, S., and Zeyringer, M.:
Formalizing best practice for energy system optimization modelling, Appl. Energ., 194, 184–198, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.001, 2017. a
Department of Finance:
Stability Programme Update 2020, Tech. rep., Department of Finance, Dublin, Ireland, 2020. a
Department of the Taoiseach:
Programme for Government: Our Shared Future, Tech. rep., Department of the Taoiseach, https://assets.gov.ie/130911/fe93e24e-dfe0-40ff-9934-def2b44b7b52.pdf (last access: 18 May 2022), 2020. a
Dineen, D., Rogan, F., and Ó Gallachóir, B. P.:
Improved modelling of thermal energy savings potential in the existing residential stock using a newly available data source, Energy, 90, 759–767, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.07.105, 2015. a, b
Duffy, P., Black, K., Hyde, B., Ryan, A. M., and Ponzi, J.:
Ireland's National Inventory Report 2019: Greenhouse Gas Emissions 1990-2017, Tech. rep., Environmental Protection Agency, Johnstown Castle, https://www.epa.ie/publications/monitoring–assessment/climate-change/air-emissions/Ireland-NIR-2019_Final.pdf (last access: 18 May 2022), 2019. a
Duffy, P., Black, K., Fahey, D., Hyde, B., Kehoe, A., Murphy, J., Quirke, B., Ryan, A. M., and Ponzi, J.:
Ireland's National Inventory Report 2020: Greenhouse Gas Emissions 1990-2018, Tech. rep., Environmetal Protection Agency, Johnstown Castle, https://www.epa.ie/publications/monitoring--assessment/climate-change/air-emissions/NIR-2020_Merge_finalv2.pdf (last access: 18 May 2022), 2020. a
EirGrid:
Tomorrow's Energy Scenarios 2017, Tech. rep., EirGrid, Dublin, Ireland, http://www.eirgridgroup.com/site-files/library/EirGrid/EirGrid-Tomorrows-Energy-Scenarios-Report-2017.pdf (last access: 18 May 2022), 2017. a, b
EirGrid and SONI:
All-Island Generation Capacity Statement 2019–2028, Tech. rep., EirGrid Group, https://www.eirgridgroup.com/site-files/library/EirGrid/EirGrid-Group-All-Island-Generation-Capacity-Statement-2019-2028.pdf (last access: 18 May 2022), 2019. a
EPA:
Ireland's Greenhouse Gas Emissions Projections 2019-2040, Tech. rep., Environmental Protection Agency, https://www.epa.ie/publications/monitoring–assessment/climate-change/air-emissions/2020-EPA-Greenhouse-Gas-Emissions-Projections_final.pdf (last access: 18 May 2022), 2020. a
Fais, B., Keppo, I., Zeyringer, M., Usher, W., and Daly, H.:
Impact of technology uncertainty on future low-carbon pathways in the UK, Energy Strateg. Rev., 13, 154–168, 2016. a
García-Gusano, D., Espegren, K., Lind, A., and Kirkengen, M.:
The role of the discount rates in energy systems optimisation models, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 59, 56–72, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.359, 2016. a
Gaur, A., Balyk, O., Glynn, J., Aryanpur, V., McGuire, J., Smith, A., Yue, X., Chiodi, A., Gargiulo, M., and Daly, H.:
TIMES-Ireland Model (v1.0.0-s.1), Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6531582, 2022a. a
Gaur, A., Balyk, O., Glynn, J., Curtis, J., and Daly, H.:
Low energy demand scenario for feasible deep decarbonisation: Whole energy systems modelling for Ireland, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition, 2, 100024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rset.2022.100024, 2022b. a
Geffert, W., Rush, J., Strunk, K., and Falk, J.:
Validation Report for I-SEM PLEXOS Model, 2018-2023, Tech. rep., NERA Economic Consulting, https://www.semcommittee.com/sites/semc/files/media-files/SEM-18-175%28a%29%20NERA%20Report%20on%20the%20validated%20SEM%20PLEXOS%20model%202018-2023.pdf (last access: 18 May 2022), 2018. a, b
Glynn, J., Gargiulo, M., Chiodi, A., Deane, P., Rogan, F., and Ó Gallachóir, B.:
Zero carbon energy system pathways for Ireland consistent with the Paris Agreement, Clim. Policy, 19, 30–42, https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1464893, 2019. a
Grubb, H. and Mason, A.:
Long lead-time forecasting of UK air passengers by Holt–Winters methods with damped trend, Int. J. Forecasting, 17, 71–82, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2070(00)00053-4, 2001. a
Helgeson, B. and Peter, J.:
The role of electricity in decarbonizing European road transport – Development and assessment of an integrated multi-sectoral model, Appl. Energ., 262, 114365, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114365, 2020. a
IEA-ETSAP:
etsap-TIMES/TIMES_model: Latest TIMES Version, Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3865460, 2020. a
IPCC:
Global Warming of 1.5 ∘C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 ∘C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change,, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2019/06/SR15_Full_Report_High_Res.pdf (last access: 18 May 2022), 2018. a
Irish Rail:
Annual Report, Tech. rep., Irish Rail, Dublin, Ireland, https://www.irishrail.ie/IrishRail/media/Imported/18_ie_annual_report_final.pdf (last access: 18 May 2022), 2018. a
Kumar, N., Peter, B., Lefton, S., Agan, D., and Hilleman, D.:
Power Plant Cycling Costs, Tech. Rep. November, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado, https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy12osti/55433.pdf (last access: 18 May 2022), 2012. a
Lian, L., Tian, W., Xu, H., and Zheng, M.:
Modeling and forecasting passenger car ownership based on symbolic regression, Sustainability (Switzerland), 10, 2275, https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072275, 2018. a
Loulou, R., Goldstein, G., Kanudia, A., Lettila, A., and Remme, U.:
Documentation for the TIMES Model Part I: TIMES Concepts and Theory, IEA-ETSAP, https://www.iea-etsap.org/docs/Documentation_for_the_TIMES_Model-Part-I.pdf
(last access: 18 May 2022), 2016a. a
Loulou, R., Lehtila, A., Kanudia, A., Remme, U., and Goldstein, G.:
Documentation for the TIMES Model Part II: Reference Manual, IEA-ETSAP, https://www.iea-etsap.org/docs/Documentation_for_the_TIMES_Model-PartII.pdf
(last access: 18 May 2022), 2016b. a
Mulholland, E., Rogan, F., and Ó Gallachóir, B. P.:
Techno-economic data for a multi-model approach to decarbonisation of the Irish private car sector, Data in Brief, 15, 922–932, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2017.10.006, 2017. a
Mulholland, E., Tattini, J., Ramea, K., Yang, C., and Ó Gallachóir, B. P.:
The cost of electrifying private transport – Evidence from an empirical consumer choice model of Ireland and Denmark, Transport. Res. D-Tr. E., 62, 584–603, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.04.010, 2018. a, b
Nambiar, A. J., Collin, A. J., Karatzounis, S., Rea, J., Whitby, B., Jeffrey, H., and Kiprakis, A. E.:
Optimising power transmission options for marine energy converter farms, International Journal of Marine Energy, 15, 127–139, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijome.2016.04.008, 2016. a
NORA:
Volumes of Oil Consumption Subject to NORA Levy, National Oil Reserves Agency (NORA), https://www.nora.ie/statistics.312.html (last access: 18 May 2022), 2021. a
NTA:
National Household Travel Survey 2017, Tech. rep., National Transport Authority, Dublin, Ireland, 2018. a
O'Callaghan, D. and Prior, S.:
Staff Paper 2018 Central Technical Appraisal Parameters Discount Rate, Time Horizon, Shadow Price of Public Funds and Shadow Price of Labour, Tech. rep., Department of Public Expenditure and Reform, https://igees.gov.ie/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Parameters-Paper-Final-Version.pdf (last access: 18 May 2022), 2018. a
OECD:
Economic Outlook No 103 – July 2018 – Long-term baseline projections, Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD), https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=EO103_LTB (last access: 18 May 2022), 2018. a
Ó Gallachóir, B., Deane, P., Glynn, J., and Rogan, F.:
The Role of Energy Technology in Climate Mitigation in Ireland: Irish TIMES Phase 3, Tech. rep., Environmental Protection Agency, Dublin, Ireland, https://www.epa.ie/publications/research/climate-change/Research_Report_326.pdf (last access: 18 May 2022), 2020. a
O'Rourke, F., Boyle, F., and Reynolds, A.:
Tidal current energy resource assessment in Ireland: Current status and future update, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14, 3206–3212, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.039, 2010. a
Petrović, S., Colangelo, A., Balyk, O., Delmastro, C., Gargiulo, M., Simonsen, M. B., and Karlsson, K.:
The role of data centres in the future Danish energy system, Energy, 194, 116928, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.116928, 2020. a
Petrović, S. N., Diachuk, O., Podolets, R., Semeniuk, A., Bühler, F., Grandal, R., Boucenna, M., and Balyk, O.:
Exploring the Long-Term Development of the Ukrainian Energy System, Energies, 14, 7731, https://doi.org/10.3390/en14227731, 2021. a
Pfenninger, S. and Staffell, I.:
Long-term patterns of European PV output using 30 years of validated hourly reanalysis and satellite data, Energy, 114, 1251–1265, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.08.060, 2016. a
Pfenninger, S., Hirth, L., Schlecht, I., Schmid, E., Wiese, F., Brown, T., Davis, C., Gidden, M., Heinrichs, H., Heuberger, C., Hilpert, S., Krien, U., Matke, C., Nebel, A., Morrison, R., Müller, B., Pleßmann, G., Reeg, M., Richstein, J. C., Shivakumar, A., Staffell, I., Tröndle, T., and Wingenbach, C.:
Opening the black box of energy modelling: Strategies and lessons learned, Energy Strateg. Rev., 19, 63–71, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2017.12.002, 2018. a
Pye, S., Broad, O., Bataille, C., Brockway, P., Daly, H. E., Freeman, R., Gambhir, A., Geden, O., Rogan, F., Sanghvi, S., Tomei, J., Vorushylo, I., and Watson, J.:
Modelling net-zero emissions energy systems requires a change in approach, Clim. Policy, 21, 222–231, https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1824891, 2021. a
Realmonte, G., Drouet, L., Gambhir, A., Glynn, J., Hawkes, A., Köberle, A. C., and Tavoni, M.:
An inter-model assessment of the role of direct air capture in deep mitigation pathways, Nat. Commun., 10, 3277, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10842-5, 2019. a
Rogan, F., Cahill, C. J., Daly, H. E., Dineen, D., Deane, J. P., Heaps, C., Welsch, M., Howells, M., Bazilian, M., and Ó Gallachóir, B. P.:
LEAPs and Bounds-an Energy Demand and Constraint Optimised Model of the Irish Energy System, Energ. Effic., 7, 441–466, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-013-9231-9, 2014. a, b
Rogelj, J., Shindell, D., Jiang, K., Fifita, S., Forster, P., Ginzburg, V., Handa, C., Kheshgi, H., Kobayashi, S., Kriegler, E., Mundaca, L., Séférian, R., and Vilariño, M.:
Mitigation pathways compatible with 1.5 ∘C in the context of sustainable development, in: Global Warming of 1.5 ∘C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 ∘C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, edited by: Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pörtner, H.-O., Roberts, D., Skea, J., Shukla, P., Pirani, A., Moufouma-Okia, W., Péan, C., Pidcock, R., Connors, S., Matthews, J., Chen, Y., Zhou, X., Gomis, M., Lonnoy, E., Maycock, T., Tignor, M., and Waterfield, T., IPCC, https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2019/02/SR15_Chapter2_Low_Res.pdf (last access: 18 May 2022), pp. 93–174, 2018. a
Ruiz, P., Nijs, W., Tarvydas, D., Sgobbi, A., Zucker, A., Pilli, R., Jonsson, R., Camia, A., Thiel, C., Hoyer-Klick, C., Dalla Longa, F., Kober, T., Badger, J., Volker, P., Elbersen, B. S., Brosowski, A., and Thrän, D.:
ENSPRESO – an open, EU-28 wide, transparent and coherent database of wind, solar and biomass energy potentials, Energy Strateg. Rev., 26, 100379, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.100379, 2019. a
SEAI:
SEAI BER Database, Tech. rep., Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland, https://ndber.seai.ie/BERResearchTool/ber/search.aspx (last access: 18 May 2022), 2020. a
SEAI:
Energy in Ireland. 2021 Report, Tech. rep., Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland, Dublin, https://www.seai.ie/publications/Energy-in-Ireland-2020.pdf (last access: 18 May 2022), 2021. a
Staffell, I. and Pfenninger, S.:
Using bias-corrected reanalysis to simulate current and future wind power output, Energy, 114, 1224–1239, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.08.068, 2016. a
Strachan, N., Fais, B., and Daly, H.:
Reinventing the energy modelling–policy interface, Nature Energy, 1, 16012, https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.12, 2016. a
TII:
Project Appraisal Guidelines for National Roads Unit 6.11 – National Parameters Values Sheet, Tech. rep., Transport Infrastructure Ireland, Dublin, Ireland, https://www.tiipublications.ie/library/PE-PAG-02030-01.pdf (last access: 18 May 2022), 2016. a
Topten International Group:
Topten, https://www.topten.eu/private (last access: 18 May 2022), 2021. a
Uidhir, T. M., Rogan, F., Collins, M., Curtis, J., and Ó Gallachóir, B.:
Residential stock data and dataset on energy efficiency characteristics of residential building fabrics in Ireland, Data in Brief, 29, 109656, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.105247, 2020a. a
Uidhir, T. M., Rogan, F., Collins, M., Curtis, J., and Ó Gallachóir, B. P.:
Improving energy savings from a residential retrofit policy: A new model to inform better retrofit decisions, Energ. Buildings, 209, 109656, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109656, 2020b.
a
Yakut, A. M. and de Bruin, K.:
Technical documentation of I3E model, Version 3, Tech. rep., Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin, Ireland, https://doi.org/10.26504/sustat91, 2020. a, b, c, d
Short summary
Ireland has significantly increased its climate mitigation ambition, with a recent commitment to reduce greenhouse gases by an average of 7 % yr-1 in the period to 2030 and a net-zero target for 2050. This article describes the TIMES-Ireland model (TIM) developed to inform Ireland's energy system decarbonisation challenge. The paper also outlines a priority list of future model developments to better meet the challenge, taking into account equity, cost-effectiveness, and technical feasibility.
Ireland has significantly increased its climate mitigation ambition, with a recent commitment to...
