Articles | Volume 15, issue 8
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3433–3445, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3433-2022
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3433–3445, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3433-2022
Development and technical paper
02 May 2022
Development and technical paper | 02 May 2022

Efficient high-dimensional variational data assimilation with machine-learned reduced-order models

Romit Maulik et al.

Related authors

Evaluation of obstacle modelling approaches for resource assessment and small wind turbine siting: case study in the northern Netherlands
Caleb Phillips, Lindsay M. Sheridan, Patrick Conry, Dimitrios K. Fytanidis, Dmitry Duplyakin, Sagi Zisman, Nicolas Duboc, Matt Nelson, Rao Kotamarthi, Rod Linn, Marc Broersma, Timo Spijkerboer, and Heidi Tinnesand
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1153–1169, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1153-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1153-2022, 2022
Short summary
Scientific Challenges to Characterizing the Wind Resource in the Marine Atmospheric Boundary Layer
William Shaw, Larry Berg, Mithu Debnath, Georgios Deskos, Caroline Draxl, Virendra Ghate, Charlotte Hasager, Rao Kotamarthi, Jeffrey Mirocha, Paytsar Muradyan, William Pringle, David Turner, and James Wilczak
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2021-156,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2021-156, 2022
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Augmentation and Use of WRF-Hydro to Simulate Overland Flow- and Streamflow-Generated Debris Flow Hazards in Burn Scars
Chuxuan Li, Alexander L. Handwerger, Jiali Wang, Wei Yu, Xiang Li, Noah J. Finnegan, Yingying Xie, Giuseppe Buscarnera, and Daniel E. Horton
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2021-345,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2021-345, 2021
Revised manuscript accepted for NHESS
Short summary
Fast and accurate learned multiresolution dynamical downscaling for precipitation
Jiali Wang, Zhengchun Liu, Ian Foster, Won Chang, Rajkumar Kettimuthu, and V. Rao Kotamarthi
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6355–6372, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6355-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6355-2021, 2021
Short summary
Effects of spatial resolution on WRF v3.8.1 simulated meteorology over the central Himalaya
Jaydeep Singh, Narendra Singh, Narendra Ojha, Amit Sharma, Andrea Pozzer, Nadimpally Kiran Kumar, Kunjukrishnapillai Rajeev, Sachin S. Gunthe, and V. Rao Kotamarthi
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1427–1443, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1427-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1427-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Numerical methods
University of Warsaw Lagrangian Cloud Model (UWLCM) 2.0: adaptation of a mixed Eulerian–Lagrangian numerical model for heterogeneous computing clusters
Piotr Dziekan and Piotr Zmijewski
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4489–4501, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4489-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4489-2022, 2022
Short summary
Prediction error growth in a more realistic atmospheric toy model with three spatiotemporal scales
Hynek Bednář and Holger Kantz
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4147–4161, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4147-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4147-2022, 2022
Short summary
On numerical broadening of particle-size spectra: a condensational growth study using PyMPDATA 1.0
Michael A. Olesik, Jakub Banaśkiewicz, Piotr Bartman, Manuel Baumgartner, Simon Unterstrasser, and Sylwester Arabas
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3879–3899, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3879-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3879-2022, 2022
Short summary
Lossy checkpoint compression in full waveform inversion: a case study with ZFPv0.5.5 and the overthrust model
Navjot Kukreja, Jan Hückelheim, Mathias Louboutin, John Washbourne, Paul H. J. Kelly, and Gerard J. Gorman
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3815–3829, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3815-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3815-2022, 2022
Short summary
Blockworlds 0.1.0: a demonstration of anti-aliased geophysics for probabilistic inversions of implicit and kinematic geological models
Richard Scalzo, Mark Lindsay, Mark Jessell, Guillaume Pirot, Jeremie Giraud, Edward Cripps, and Sally Cripps
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3641–3662, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3641-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3641-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Akella, S. and Navon, I.: Different approaches to model error formulation in 4D-Var: A study with high-resolution advection schemes, Tellus A, 61, 112–128, 2009. a
Bauer, H.-S., Schwitalla, T., Wulfmeyer, V., Bakhshaii, A., Ehret, U., Neuper, M., and Caumont, O.: Quantitative precipitation estimation based on high-resolution numerical weather prediction and data assimilation with WRF – a performance test, Tellus A, 67, 25047, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v67.25047, 2015. a
Berkooz, G., Holmes, P., and Lumley, J. L.: The proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 25, 539–575, 1993. a, b
Brajard, J., Carrassi, A., Bocquet, M., and Bertino, L.: Combining data assimilation and machine learning to emulate a dynamical model from sparse and noisy observations: A case study with the Lorenz 96 model, J. Comput. Sci., 44, 101171, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2020.101171, 2020. a, b
Brajard, J., Carrassi, A., Bocquet, M., and Bertino, L.: Combining data assimilation and machine learning to infer unresolved scale parametrization, Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 379, 20200086, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0086, 2021. a
Download

The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.

Short summary
In numerical weather prediction, data assimilation is frequently utilized to enhance the accuracy of forecasts from equation-based models. In this work we use a machine learning framework that approximates a complex dynamical system given by the geopotential height. Instead of using an equation-based model, we utilize this machine-learned alternative to dramatically accelerate both the forecast and the assimilation of data, thereby reducing need for large computational resources.