Articles | Volume 13, issue 9
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4019–4040, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4019-2020
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4019–4040, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4019-2020

Development and technical paper 04 Sep 2020

Development and technical paper | 04 Sep 2020

Constraining the response of phytoplankton to zooplankton grazing and photo-acclimation in a temperate shelf sea with a 1-D model – towards S2P3 v8.0

Angela A. Bahamondes Dominguez et al.

Related authors

The pH dependency of the boron isotopic composition of diatom opal (Thalassiosira weissflogii)
Hannah K. Donald, Gavin L. Foster, Nico Fröhberg, George E. A. Swann, Alex J. Poulton, C. Mark Moore, and Matthew P. Humphreys
Biogeosciences, 17, 2825–2837, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-2825-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-2825-2020, 2020
Short summary
Spatial variations in silicate-to-nitrate ratios in Southern Ocean surface waters are controlled in the short term by physics rather than biology
Pieter Demuynck, Toby Tyrrell, Alberto Naveira Garabato, Mark Christopher Moore, and Adrian Peter Martin
Biogeosciences, 17, 2289–2314, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-2289-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-2289-2020, 2020
Short summary
Dimensions of marine phytoplankton diversity
Stephanie Dutkiewicz, Pedro Cermeno, Oliver Jahn, Michael J. Follows, Anna E. Hickman, Darcy A. A. Taniguchi, and Ben A. Ward
Biogeosciences, 17, 609–634, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-609-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-609-2020, 2020
Short summary
A meta-analysis of microcosm experiments shows that dimethyl sulfide (DMS) production in polar waters is insensitive to ocean acidification
Frances E. Hopkins, Philip D. Nightingale, John A. Stephens, C. Mark Moore, Sophie Richier, Gemma L. Cripps, and Stephen D. Archer
Biogeosciences, 17, 163–186, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-163-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-163-2020, 2020
Short summary
Photosynthesis–irradiance parameters of marine phytoplankton: synthesis of a global data set
Heather A. Bouman, Trevor Platt, Martina Doblin, Francisco G. Figueiras, Kristinn Gudmundsson, Hafsteinn G. Gudfinnsson, Bangqin Huang, Anna Hickman, Michael Hiscock, Thomas Jackson, Vivian A. Lutz, Frédéric Mélin, Francisco Rey, Pierre Pepin, Valeria Segura, Gavin H. Tilstone, Virginie van Dongen-Vogels, and Shubha Sathyendranath
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 251–266, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-251-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-251-2018, 2018
Short summary

Related subject area

Oceanography
HIDRA 1.0: deep-learning-based ensemble sea level forecasting in the northern Adriatic
Lojze Žust, Anja Fettich, Matej Kristan, and Matjaž Ličer
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 2057–2074, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2057-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2057-2021, 2021
Short summary
Towards multiscale modeling of ocean surface turbulent mixing using coupled MPAS-Ocean v6.3 and PALM v5.0
Qing Li and Luke Van Roekel
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 2011–2028, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2011-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2011-2021, 2021
Short summary
Improved representation of river runoff in Estimating the Circulation and Climate of the Ocean Version 4 (ECCOv4) simulations: implementation, evaluation, and impacts to coastal plume regions
Yang Feng, Dimitris Menemenlis, Huijie Xue, Hong Zhang, Dustin Carroll, Yan Du, and Hui Wu
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1801–1819, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1801-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1801-2021, 2021
Short summary
The Regional Ice Ocean Prediction System v2: a pan-Canadian ocean analysis system using an online tidal harmonic analysis
Gregory C. Smith, Yimin Liu, Mounir Benkiran, Kamel Chikhar, Dorina Surcel Colan, Audrey-Anne Gauthier, Charles-Emmanuel Testut, Frederic Dupont, Ji Lei, François Roy, Jean-François Lemieux, and Fraser Davidson
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1445–1467, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1445-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1445-2021, 2021
Short summary
Global storm tide modeling with ADCIRC v55: unstructured mesh design and performance
William J. Pringle, Damrongsak Wirasaet, Keith J. Roberts, and Joannes J. Westerink
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1125–1145, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1125-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1125-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Anderson, T. R.: Plankton functional type modelling: running before we can walk?, J. Plankton Res., 27, 1073–1081, 2005. a, b
Ayata, S. D., Levy, M., Aumont, O., Sciandra, A., Sainte-Marie, J., Tagliabue, A., and Bernard, O.: Phytoplankton growth formulation in marine ecosystem models: Should we take into account photo-acclimation and variable stoichiometry in oligotrophic areas?, J. Marine Syst., 125, 29–40, 2013. a, b
Bahamondes Dominguez, A., Hickman, A. E., Marsh, R., and Moore, C. M.: Constraining the response of phytoplankton to zooplankton grazing and photo-acclimation in a temperate shelf sea with a 1-D model – towards S2P3 v8.0 (Version 8.0), Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3600467, 2020. a
Banse, K.: Grazing and Zooplankton Production as Key Controls of Phytoplankton Production in the Open Ocean, Oceanography, 7, 13–20, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.1994.10, 1994. a
Beaugrand, G. and Kirby, R. R.: Climate, plankton and cod, Glob. Change Biol., 16, 1268–1280, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02063.x, 2010. a
Download
Short summary
The central Celtic Sea has previously been studied with a 1-D model called S2P3, showing discrepancies between observations and the model results due to poor representation of some processes. Therefore, the S2P3 model was developed to include zooplankton and phytoplankton cells' adaptation to changes in irradiance. Results demonstrate that better agreement with biological observations can be achieved when the model includes these processes and is adequately constrained.