Articles | Volume 10, issue 11
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4105–4127, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4105-2017
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4105–4127, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4105-2017

Development and technical paper 13 Nov 2017

Development and technical paper | 13 Nov 2017

A prognostic pollen emissions model for climate models (PECM1.0)

Matthew C. Wozniak and Allison L. Steiner

Related authors

Transport-driven aerosol differences above and below the canopy of a mixed deciduous forest
Alexander A. T. Bui, Henry W. Wallace, Sarah Kavassalis, Hariprasad D. Alwe, James H. Flynn, Matt H. Erickson, Sergio Alvarez, Dylan B. Millet, Allison L. Steiner, and Robert J. Griffin
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-384,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-384, 2021
Preprint under review for ACP
Short summary
FORest Canopy Atmosphere Transfer (FORCAsT) 2.0: model updates and evaluation with observations at a mixed forest site
Dandan Wei, Hariprasad D. Alwe, Dylan B. Millet, Brandon Bottorff, Michelle Lew, Philip S. Stevens, Joshua D. Shutter, Joshua L. Cox, Frank N. Keutsch, Qianwen Shi, Sarah C. Kavassalis, Jennifer G. Murphy, Krystal T. Vasquez, Hannah M. Allen, Eric Praske, John D. Crounse, Paul O. Wennberg, Paul B. Shepson, Alexander A. T. Bui, Henry W. Wallace, Robert J. Griffin, Nathaniel W. May, Megan Connor, Jonathan H. Slade, Kerri A. Pratt, Ezra C. Wood, Mathew Rollings, Benjamin L. Deming, Daniel C. Anderson, and Allison L. Steiner
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2021-104,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2021-104, 2021
Preprint under review for GMD
Short summary
Drivers of the fungal spore bioaerosol budget: observational analysis and global modeling
Ruud H. H. Janssen, Colette L. Heald, Allison L. Steiner, Anne E. Perring, J. Alex Huffman, Ellis S. Robinson, Cynthia H. Twohy, and Luke D. Ziemba
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 4381–4401, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4381-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4381-2021, 2021
Short summary
Impact of dust size parameterizations on aerosol burden and radiative forcing in RegCM4
Athanasios Tsikerdekis, Prodromos Zanis, Allison L. Steiner, Fabien Solmon, Vassilis Amiridis, Eleni Marinou, Eleni Katragkou, Theodoros Karacostas, and Gilles Foret
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 769–791, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-769-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-769-2017, 2017
Short summary
Modelling bidirectional fluxes of methanol and acetaldehyde with the FORCAsT canopy exchange model
Kirsti Ashworth, Serena H. Chung, Karena A. McKinney, Ying Liu, J. William Munger, Scot T. Martin, and Allison L. Steiner
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 15461–15484, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15461-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15461-2016, 2016

Related subject area

Climate and Earth system modeling
Unstructured global to coastal wave modeling for the Energy Exascale Earth System Model using WAVEWATCH III version 6.07
Steven R. Brus, Phillip J. Wolfram, Luke P. Van Roekel, and Jessica D. Meixner
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 2917–2938, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2917-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2917-2021, 2021
Short summary
TransEBM v. 1.0: description, tuning, and validation of a transient model of the Earth's energy balance in two dimensions
Elisa Ziegler and Kira Rehfeld
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 2843–2866, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2843-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2843-2021, 2021
Short summary
SimCloud version 1.0: a simple diagnostic cloud scheme for idealized climate models
Qun Liu, Matthew Collins, Penelope Maher, Stephen I. Thomson, and Geoffrey K. Vallis
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 2801–2826, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2801-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2801-2021, 2021
Short summary
Sensitivity of precipitation and temperature over the Mount Kenya area to physics parameterization options in a high-resolution model simulation performed with WRFV3.8.1
Martina Messmer, Santos J. González-Rojí, Christoph C. Raible, and Thomas F. Stocker
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 2691–2711, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2691-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2691-2021, 2021
Short summary
The GPU version of LASG/IAP Climate System Ocean Model version 3 (LICOM3) under the heterogeneous-compute interface for portability (HIP) framework and its large-scale application
Pengfei Wang, Jinrong Jiang, Pengfei Lin, Mengrong Ding, Junlin Wei, Feng Zhang, Lian Zhao, Yiwen Li, Zipeng Yu, Weipeng Zheng, Yongqiang Yu, Xuebin Chi, and Hailong Liu
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 2781–2799, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2781-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2781-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Beggs, P. J., Šikoparija, B., and Smith, M.: Aerobiology in the International Journal of Biometeorology, 1957–2017, 61, 51–58, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-017-1374-5, 2017.
Box, G. E. P., Jenkins, G. M., Reinsel, G. C., and Ljung, G. M.: Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control, Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall, NJ, 1994. 
Cecchi, L.: Introduction, in: Allergenic Pollen: A Review of the Production, Release, Distribution and Health Impacts, edited by: Sofiev, M. and Bergmann, K.-C., Springer Science+Business Media, Dordrecht, New York, London, 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4881-1, 2014.
Chuine, I., Cour, P., and Rousseau, D. D.: Selecting Models to Predict the Timing of Flowering of Temperate Trees: Implications for Tree Phenology Modelling. Plant Cell Environ. 22, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00395.x, 1999.
Clay, S. A., Kreutner, B., Clay, D. E., Reese, C., Kleinjan, J., and Forcella, F.: Spatial distribution, temporal stability, and yield loss estimates for annual grasses and common ragweed (Ambrosia artimisiifolia) in a corn/soybean production field over nine years, Weed Sci. 54, 380–390, https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-05-090R1.1, 2006.
Download
Short summary
A new parameterization, Pollen Emissions for Climate Models (PECM), has been developed for use in climate models. New developments include (1) a new climate-sensitive, observation-based phenological model, (2) inclusion of the 13 highest-pollinating taxa in the United States, and (3) an option to compute pollen emissions by plant functional type (PFT). It can be used to address topics like impacts of climate change (e.g., on allergen exposure, on plant ecology) or pollen as an atmospheric aerosol.