Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.240 IF 5.240
  • IF 5-year value: 5.768 IF 5-year
    5.768
  • CiteScore value: 8.9 CiteScore
    8.9
  • SNIP value: 1.713 SNIP 1.713
  • IPP value: 5.53 IPP 5.53
  • SJR value: 3.18 SJR 3.18
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 71 Scimago H
    index 71
  • h5-index value: 51 h5-index 51
Volume 9, issue 8
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 2893–2908, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2893-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 2893–2908, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2893-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Methods for assessment of models 26 Aug 2016

Methods for assessment of models | 26 Aug 2016

EnKF and 4D-Var data assimilation with chemical transport model BASCOE (version 05.06)

Sergey Skachko et al.

Related authors

Weakly coupled atmosphere–ocean data assimilation in the Canadian global prediction system (v1)
Sergey Skachko, Mark Buehner, Stéphane Laroche, Ervig Lapalme, Gregory Smith, François Roy, Dorina Surcel-Colan, Jean-Marc Bélanger, and Louis Garand
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 5097–5112, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-5097-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-5097-2019, 2019
Short summary
Technical note: Reanalysis of Aura MLS chemical observations
Quentin Errera, Simon Chabrillat, Yves Christophe, Jonas Debosscher, Daan Hubert, William Lahoz, Michelle L. Santee, Masato Shiotani, Sergey Skachko, Thomas von Clarmann, and Kaley Walker
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 13647–13679, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13647-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13647-2019, 2019
Short summary
Harmonisation and diagnostics of MIPAS ESA CH4 and N2O profiles using data assimilation
Quentin Errera, Simone Ceccherini, Yves Christophe, Simon Chabrillat, Michaela I. Hegglin, Alyn Lambert, Richard Ménard, Piera Raspollini, Sergey Skachko, Michiel van Weele, and Kaley A. Walker
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 5895–5909, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5895-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5895-2016, 2016
Short summary
Comparison of the ensemble Kalman filter and 4D-Var assimilation methods using a stratospheric tracer transport model
S. Skachko, Q. Errera, R. Ménard, Y. Christophe, and S. Chabrillat
Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 1451–1465, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1451-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1451-2014, 2014

Related subject area

Numerical Methods
Efficient multi-scale Gaussian process regression for massive remote sensing data with satGP v0.1.2
Jouni Susiluoto, Alessio Spantini, Heikki Haario, Teemu Härkönen, and Youssef Marzouk
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3439–3463, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3439-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3439-2020, 2020
Short summary
PDE-NetGen 1.0: from symbolic partial differential equation (PDE) representations of physical processes to trainable neural network representations
Olivier Pannekoucke and Ronan Fablet
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3373–3382, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3373-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3373-2020, 2020
Short summary
Simple algorithms to compute meridional overturning and barotropic streamfunctions on unstructured meshes
Dmitry Sidorenko, Sergey Danilov, Nikolay Koldunov, Patrick Scholz, and Qiang Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3337–3345, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3337-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3337-2020, 2020
Short summary
Development of a two-way-coupled ocean–wave model: assessment on a global NEMO(v3.6)–WW3(v6.02) coupled configuration
Xavier Couvelard, Florian Lemarié, Guillaume Samson, Jean-Luc Redelsperger, Fabrice Ardhuin, Rachid Benshila, and Gurvan Madec
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3067–3090, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3067-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3067-2020, 2020
Short summary
Surrogate-assisted Bayesian inversion for landscape and basin evolution models
Rohitash Chandra, Danial Azam, Arpit Kapoor, and R. Dietmar Müller
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2959–2979, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2959-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2959-2020, 2020
Short summary

Cited articles

Anderson, E. and Järvinen, H.: Variational quality control, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125, 697–722, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712555416, 1999.
Anderson, J. L.: Localization and Sampling Error Correction in Ensemble Kalman Filter Data Assimilation, Mon. Weather Rev., 140, 2359–2371, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00013.1, 2012.
Bocquet, M., Elbern, H., Eskes, H., Hirtl, M., vZabkar, R., Carmichael, G. R., Flemming, J., Inness, A., Pagowski, M., Pérez Camaño, J. L., Saide, P. E., San Jose, R., Sofiev, M., Vira, J., Baklanov, A., Carnevale, C., Grell, G., and Seigneur, C.: Data assimilation in atmospheric chemistry models: current status and future prospects for coupled chemistry meteorology models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5325–5358, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5325-2015, 2015.
Brasseur, G. and Solomon, S.: Aeronomy of the middle atmosphere: chemistry and physics of the stratosphere and mesosphere, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, Reidel, https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3824-0, 1986, 2005.
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
In the present work, we performed a comparison of two broadly used data assimilation algorithms, 4D-Var and EnKF, applied to a state-of-the-art atmospheric chemistry transport model. The comparison is carried out using carefully calibrated error statistics. The paper discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each method applied to real-life conditions of a numerical atmospheric chemistry data assimilation.
In the present work, we performed a comparison of two broadly used data assimilation algorithms,...
Citation