Articles | Volume 2, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2-97-2009
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2-97-2009
28 Jul 2009
 | 28 Jul 2009

Aerosol microphysics modules in the framework of the ECHAM5 climate model – intercomparison under stratospheric conditions

H. Kokkola, R. Hommel, J. Kazil, U. Niemeier, A.-I. Partanen, J. Feichter, and C. Timmreck

Related subject area

Climate and Earth system modeling
Yeti 1.0: a generalized framework for constructing bottom-up emission inventories from traffic sources at road-link resolutions
Edward C. Chan, Joana Leitão, Andreas Kerschbaumer, and Timothy M. Butler
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1427–1444, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1427-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1427-2023, 2023
Short summary
Analysis of systematic biases in tropospheric hydrostatic delay models and construction of a correction model
Haopeng Fan, Siran Li, Zhongmiao Sun, Guorui Xiao, Xinxing Li, and Xiaogang Liu
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1345–1358, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1345-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1345-2023, 2023
Short summary
A new precipitation emulator (PREMU v1.0) for lower-complexity models
Gang Liu, Shushi Peng, Chris Huntingford, and Yi Xi
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1277–1296, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1277-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1277-2023, 2023
Short summary
Simulating marine neodymium isotope distributions using Nd v1.0 coupled to the ocean component of the FAMOUS–MOSES1 climate model: sensitivities to reversible scavenging efficiency and benthic source distributions
Suzanne Robinson, Ruza F. Ivanovic, Lauren J. Gregoire, Julia Tindall, Tina van de Flierdt, Yves Plancherel, Frerk Pöppelmeier, Kazuyo Tachikawa, and Paul J. Valdes
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1231–1264, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1231-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1231-2023, 2023
Short summary
CMIP6 simulations with the compact Earth system model OSCAR v3.1
Yann Quilcaille, Thomas Gasser, Philippe Ciais, and Olivier Boucher
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1129–1161, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1129-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1129-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Adams, P. J. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Predicting global aerosol size distributions in general circulation models, Journal of Geophysical Research (Atmospheres), 107, 4–1, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001010, 2002.
Brock, C., Jonsson, H., Wilson, J., Dye, J., Baumgardner, D., Borrmann, S., Pitts, M., Osborn, M., DeCoursey, R., and Woods, D.: Relationships between optical extinction, backscatter and aerosol surface and volume in the stratosphere following the eruption of Mt. Pinatubo, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 2555–2558, 1993.
Brown, P. N., Byrne, G. D., and Hindmarsh, A. C.: VODE, A Variable- C}oefficient {ODE {S}olver, SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput., 10, 1038–1051, 1989.
Chen, Y. and Penner, J. E.: Uncertainty analysis for estimates of the first indirect aerosol effect, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2935–2948, 2005.
Chlond, A.: Locally modified version of Bott's advection scheme, Mon. Weather Rev., 122, 111–125, 1994.