Articles | Volume 2, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2-97-2009
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2-97-2009
28 Jul 2009
 | 28 Jul 2009

Aerosol microphysics modules in the framework of the ECHAM5 climate model – intercomparison under stratospheric conditions

H. Kokkola, R. Hommel, J. Kazil, U. Niemeier, A.-I. Partanen, J. Feichter, and C. Timmreck

Related subject area

Climate and Earth system modeling
CICERO Simple Climate Model (CICERO-SCM v1.1.1) – an improved simple climate model with a parameter calibration tool
Marit Sandstad, Borgar Aamaas, Ane Nordlie Johansen, Marianne Tronstad Lund, Glen Philip Peters, Bjørn Hallvard Samset, Benjamin Mark Sanderson, and Ragnhild Bieltvedt Skeie
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6589–6625, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6589-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6589-2024, 2024
Short summary
Development of a plant carbon–nitrogen interface coupling framework in a coupled biophysical-ecosystem–biogeochemical model (SSiB5/TRIFFID/DayCent-SOM v1.0)
Zheng Xiang, Yongkang Xue, Weidong Guo, Melannie D. Hartman, Ye Liu, and William J. Parton
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6437–6464, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6437-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6437-2024, 2024
Short summary
Dynamical Madden–Julian Oscillation forecasts using an ensemble subseasonal-to-seasonal forecast system of the IAP-CAS model
Yangke Liu, Qing Bao, Bian He, Xiaofei Wu, Jing Yang, Yimin Liu, Guoxiong Wu, Tao Zhu, Siyuan Zhou, Yao Tang, Ankang Qu, Yalan Fan, Anling Liu, Dandan Chen, Zhaoming Luo, Xing Hu, and Tongwen Wu
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6249–6275, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6249-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6249-2024, 2024
Short summary
Implementation of a brittle sea ice rheology in an Eulerian, finite-difference, C-grid modeling framework: impact on the simulated deformation of sea ice in the Arctic
Laurent Brodeau, Pierre Rampal, Einar Ólason, and Véronique Dansereau
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6051–6082, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6051-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6051-2024, 2024
Short summary
HSW-V v1.0: localized injections of interactive volcanic aerosols and their climate impacts in a simple general circulation model
Joseph P. Hollowed, Christiane Jablonowski, Hunter Y. Brown, Benjamin R. Hillman, Diana L. Bull, and Joseph L. Hart
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5913–5938, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5913-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5913-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Adams, P. J. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Predicting global aerosol size distributions in general circulation models, Journal of Geophysical Research (Atmospheres), 107, 4–1, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001010, 2002.
Brock, C., Jonsson, H., Wilson, J., Dye, J., Baumgardner, D., Borrmann, S., Pitts, M., Osborn, M., DeCoursey, R., and Woods, D.: Relationships between optical extinction, backscatter and aerosol surface and volume in the stratosphere following the eruption of Mt. Pinatubo, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 2555–2558, 1993.
Brown, P. N., Byrne, G. D., and Hindmarsh, A. C.: VODE, A Variable- C}oefficient {ODE {S}olver, SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput., 10, 1038–1051, 1989.
Chen, Y. and Penner, J. E.: Uncertainty analysis for estimates of the first indirect aerosol effect, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2935–2948, 2005.
Chlond, A.: Locally modified version of Bott's advection scheme, Mon. Weather Rev., 122, 111–125, 1994.