Articles | Volume 18, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1395-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1395-2025
Development and technical paper
 | 
05 Mar 2025
Development and technical paper |  | 05 Mar 2025

Hydro-geomorphological modelling of leaky wooden dam efficacy from reach to catchment scale with CAESAR-Lisflood 1.9j

Joshua M. Wolstenholme, Christopher J. Skinner, David Milan, Robert E. Thomas, and Daniel R. Parsons

Related authors

Localised geomorphic response to channel-spanning leaky wooden dams
Joshua M. Wolstenholme, Christopher J. Skinner, David J. Milan, Robert E. Thomas, and Daniel R. Parsons
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3001,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3001, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Numerical methods
Enhancing single precision with quasi-double precision: achieving double-precision accuracy in the Model for Prediction Across Scales – Atmosphere (MPAS-A) version 8.2.1
Jiayi Lai, Lanning Wang, Qizhong Wu, Yizhou Yang, and Fang Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1089–1102, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1089-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1089-2025, 2025
Short summary
Advances in land surface forecasting: a comparison of LSTM, gradient boosting, and feed-forward neural networks as prognostic state emulators in a case study with ecLand
Marieke Wesselkamp, Matthew Chantry, Ewan Pinnington, Margarita Choulga, Souhail Boussetta, Maria Kalweit, Joschka Bödecker, Carsten F. Dormann, Florian Pappenberger, and Gianpaolo Balsamo
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 921–937, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-921-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-921-2025, 2025
Short summary
Subgrid corrections for the linear inertial equations of a compound flood model – a case study using SFINCS 2.1.1 Dollerup release
Maarten van Ormondt, Tim Leijnse, Roel de Goede, Kees Nederhoff, and Ap van Dongeren
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 843–861, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-843-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-843-2025, 2025
Short summary
Introducing Iterative Model Calibration (IMC) v1.0: a generalizable framework for numerical model calibration with a CAESAR-Lisflood case study
Chayan Banerjee, Kien Nguyen, Clinton Fookes, Gregory Hancock, and Thomas Coulthard
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 803–818, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-803-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-803-2025, 2025
Short summary
Development of a high-order global dynamical core using the discontinuous Galerkin method for an atmospheric large-eddy simulation (LES) and proposal of test cases: SCALE-DG v0.8.0
Yuta Kawai and Hirofumi Tomita
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 725–762, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-725-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-725-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Abbe, T. B. and Montgomery, D. R.: Large wood debris jams, channel hydraulics and habitat formation in large rivers, Regul. Rivers: Res. Manage., 12, 201–221, https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(199603)12:2/3<201::AID-RRR390>3.3.CO;2-1, 1996. 
Abbe, T., Hrachovec, M., and Winter, S.: Engineered Log Jams: Recent Developments in Their Design and Placement, with examples from the Pacific Northwest, U.S.A, in: Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences, Elsevier, https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-409548-9.11031-0, 2018. 
Addy, S. and Wilkinson, M. E.: An assessment of engineered log jam structures in response to a flood event in an upland gravel-bed river, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 4112, 1658–1670, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3936, 2016. 
Addy, S. and Wilkinson, M. E.: Representing natural and artificial in-channel large wood in numerical hydraulic and hydrological models, WIREs Water, 6, 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1389, 2019. 
Al-Zawaidah, H., Ravazzolo, D., and Friedrich, H.: Local geomorphic effects in the presence of accumulations of different densities, Geomorphology, 389, 107838, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.107838, 2021. 
Download
Short summary
Leaky wooden dams are a type of natural flood management intervention that aims to reduce flood risk downstream by temporarily holding back water during a storm event and releasing it afterwards. These structures alter the river hydrology, and therefore the geomorphology, yet often this is excluded from numerical models. Here we show that by not simulating geomorphology, we are currently underestimating the efficacy of these structures to reduce the flood peak and store water.
Share