Articles | Volume 17, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3467-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3467-2024
Model evaluation paper
 | 
30 Apr 2024
Model evaluation paper |  | 30 Apr 2024

Developing meshing workflows in Gmsh v4.11 for the geologic uncertainty assessment of high-temperature aquifer thermal energy storage

Ali Dashti, Jens C. Grimmer, Christophe Geuzaine, Florian Bauer, and Thomas Kohl

Related authors

Stress state at faults: the influence of rock stiffness contrast, stress orientation, and ratio
Moritz O. Ziegler, Robin Seithel, Thomas Niederhuber, Oliver Heidbach, Thomas Kohl, Birgit Müller, Mojtaba Rajabi, Karsten Reiter, and Luisa Röckel
Solid Earth, 15, 1047–1063, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-1047-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-1047-2024, 2024
Short summary
GeoLaB – Geothermal Laboratory in the crystalline Basement: synergies with research for a nuclear waste repository
Thomas Kohl, Ingo Sass, Olaf Kolditz, Christoph Schüth, Wolfram Rühaak, Jürgen Schamp, Judith Bremer, Bastian Rudolph, Katharina Schätzler, and Eva Schill
Saf. Nucl. Waste Disposal, 2, 135–136, https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-135-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/sand-2-135-2023, 2023
Short summary
Transport mechanisms of hydrothermal convection in faulted tight sandstones
Guoqiang Yan, Benjamin Busch, Robert Egert, Morteza Esmaeilpour, Kai Stricker, and Thomas Kohl
Solid Earth, 14, 293–310, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-14-293-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-14-293-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Numerical methods
Numerical stabilization methods for level-set-based ice front migration
Gong Cheng, Mathieu Morlighem, and G. Hilmar Gudmundsson
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6227–6247, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6227-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6227-2024, 2024
Short summary
Modelling chemical advection during magma ascent
Hugo Dominguez, Nicolas Riel, and Pierre Lanari
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6105–6122, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6105-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6105-2024, 2024
Short summary
Consistent point data assimilation in Firedrake and Icepack
Reuben W. Nixon-Hill, Daniel Shapero, Colin J. Cotter, and David A. Ham
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5369–5386, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5369-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5369-2024, 2024
Short summary
A computationally efficient parameterization of aerosol, cloud and precipitation pH for application at global and regional scale (EQSAM4Clim-v12)
Swen Metzger, Samuel Rémy, Jason E. Williams, Vincent Huijnen, and Johannes Flemming
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5009–5021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5009-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5009-2024, 2024
Short summary
Assessing the benefits of approximately exact step sizes for Picard and Newton solver in simulating ice flow (FEniCS-full-Stokes v.1.3.2)
Niko Schmidt, Angelika Humbert, and Thomas Slawig
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4943–4959, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4943-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4943-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Agemar, T., Schellschmidt, R., and Schulz, R.: Subsurface temperature distribution in Germany, Geothermics, 44, 65–77, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2012.07.002, 2012. 
Baillieux, P., Schill, E., Edel, J.-B., and Mauri, G.: Localization of temperature anomalies in the Upper Rhine Graben: insights from geophysics and neotectonic activity, Int. Geol. Rev., 55, 1744–1762, https://doi.org/10.1080/00206814.2013.794914, 2013. 
Birdsell, D. T. and Saar, M. O.: Modeling Ground Surface Deformation at the Swiss HEATSTORE Underground Thermal Energy Storage Sites, in: World Geothermal Congress (WGC 2020+ 1), p. 22046, 2020. 
Blöcher, G., Regenspurg, S., Kranz, S., Lipus, M., Pei, L., Norden, B., Reinsch, T., Henninges, J., Siemon, R., Orenczuk, D., Zeilfelder, S., Scheytt, T., and Saadat, A.: Best practices for characterization of High Temperature-Aquifer Thermal Energy Storage (HT-ATES) potential using well tests in Berlin (Germany) as an example, Geothermics, 116, 102830, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2023.102830, 2024. 
Bloemendal, M., Olsthoorn, T., and Boons, F.: How to achieve optimal and sustainable use of the subsurface for Aquifer Thermal Energy Storage, Energ. Policy, 66, 104–114, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.11.034, 2014. 
Download
Short summary
This study developed new meshing workflows to enable the automatic generation of meshes that follow geological models. The workflow allows for importing several geological models as input for Gmsh and later exporting the same number of high-quality meshes. This way, geological uncertainty is directly included in the numerical simulations. This study evaluates the impact of the geological uncertainty on thermohydraulic performance of two reservoirs for high-temperature heat storage applications.