Articles | Volume 16, issue 14
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4017-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4017-2023
Development and technical paper
 | 
17 Jul 2023
Development and technical paper |  | 17 Jul 2023

A machine learning approach targeting parameter estimation for plant functional type coexistence modeling using ELM-FATES (v2.0)

Lingcheng Li, Yilin Fang, Zhonghua Zheng, Mingjie Shi, Marcos Longo, Charles D. Koven, Jennifer A. Holm, Rosie A. Fisher, Nate G. McDowell, Jeffrey Chambers, and L. Ruby Leung

Related authors

Ecosystem leaf area, gross primary production, and evapotranspiration responses to wildfire in the Columbia River basin
Mingjie Shi, Nate McDowell, Huilin Huang, Faria Zahura, Lingcheng Li, and Xingyuan Chen
Biogeosciences, 22, 2225–2238, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-2225-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-2225-2025, 2025
Short summary
Global 1 km land surface parameters for kilometer-scale Earth system modeling
Lingcheng Li, Gautam Bisht, Dalei Hao, and L. Ruby Leung
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 2007–2032, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2007-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2007-2024, 2024
Short summary
Development of inter-grid-cell lateral unsaturated and saturated flow model in the E3SM Land Model (v2.0)
Han Qiu, Gautam Bisht, Lingcheng Li, Dalei Hao, and Donghui Xu
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 143–167, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-143-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-143-2024, 2024
Short summary
An ensemble of 48 physically perturbed model estimates of the 1∕8° terrestrial water budget over the conterminous United States, 1980–2015
Hui Zheng, Wenli Fei, Zong-Liang Yang, Jiangfeng Wei, Long Zhao, Lingcheng Li, and Shu Wang
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2755–2780, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2755-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2755-2023, 2023
Short summary
Spatial heterogeneity effects on land surface modeling of water and energy partitioning
Lingcheng Li, Gautam Bisht, and L. Ruby Leung
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5489–5510, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5489-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5489-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Climate and Earth system modeling
SURFER v3.0: a fast model with ice sheet tipping points and carbon cycle feedbacks for short- and long-term climate scenarios
Victor Couplet, Marina Martínez Montero, and Michel Crucifix
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3081–3129, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3081-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3081-2025, 2025
Short summary
NMH-CS 3.0: a C# programming language and Windows-system-based ecohydrological model derived from Noah-MP
Yong-He Liu and Zong-Liang Yang
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3157–3174, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3157-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3157-2025, 2025
Short summary
A method for quantifying uncertainty in spatially interpolated meteorological data with application to daily maximum air temperature
Conor T. Doherty, Weile Wang, Hirofumi Hashimoto, and Ian G. Brosnan
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3003–3016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3003-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3003-2025, 2025
Short summary
Baseline Climate Variables for Earth System Modelling
Martin Juckes, Karl E. Taylor, Fabrizio Antonio, David Brayshaw, Carlo Buontempo, Jian Cao, Paul J. Durack, Michio Kawamiya, Hyungjun Kim, Tomas Lovato, Chloe Mackallah, Matthew Mizielinski, Alessandra Nuzzo, Martina Stockhause, Daniele Visioni, Jeremy Walton, Briony Turner, Eleanor O'Rourke, and Beth Dingley
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2639–2663, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2639-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2639-2025, 2025
Short summary
PaleoSTeHM v1.0: a modern, scalable spatiotemporal hierarchical modeling framework for paleo-environmental data
Yucheng Lin, Robert E. Kopp, Alexander Reedy, Matteo Turilli, Shantenu Jha, and Erica L. Ashe
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2609–2637, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2609-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2609-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Adler, P. B., HilleRisLambers, J., Kyriakidis, P. C., Guan, Q., and Levine, J. M.: Climate variability has a stabilizing effect on the coexistence of prairie grasses, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 12793–12798, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0600599103, 2006. 
Adler, P. B., Fajardo, A., Kleinhesselink, A. R., and Kraft, N. J. B.: Trait-based tests of coexistence mechanisms, Ecol. Lett., 16, 1294–1306, https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12157, 2013. 
Angert, A. L., Huxman, T. E., Chesson, P., and Venable, D. L.: Functional tradeoffs determine species coexistence via the storage effect, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 11641–11645, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0904512106, 2009. 
Antoniadis, A., Lambert-Lacroix, S., and Poggi, J.-M.: Random forests for global sensitivity analysis: A selective review, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 206, 107312, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107312, 2020. 
Download
Short summary
Accurately modeling plant coexistence in vegetation demographic models like ELM-FATES is challenging. This study proposes a repeatable method that uses machine-learning-based surrogate models to optimize plant trait parameters in ELM-FATES. Our approach significantly improves plant coexistence modeling, thus reducing errors. It has important implications for modeling ecosystem dynamics in response to climate change.
Share