Articles | Volume 16, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3029-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3029-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Model evaluation paper
| 
01 Jun 2023
Model evaluation paper |
| 01 Jun 2023
| 01 Jun 2023
Technical descriptions of the experimental dynamical downscaling simulations over North America by the CAM–MPAS variable-resolution model
Koichi Sakaguchi
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA
L. Ruby Leung
Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA
Colin M. Zarzycki
Department of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
Jihyeon Jang
Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
Seth McGinnis
Research Application Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
Bryce E. Harrop
Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA
William C. Skamarock
Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
Andrew Gettelman
Climate and Global Dynamics Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
Chun Zhao
School of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
William J. Gutowski
Geological And Atmospheric Sciences Department, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA
Stephen Leak
The National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, Berkeley, CA, USA
Linda Mearns
Research Application Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
Related authors
Sheng-Lun Tai, Zhao Yang, Brian Gaudet, Koichi Sakaguchi, Larry Berg, Colleen Kaul, Yun Qian, Ye Liu, and Jerome Fast
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-599, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-599, 2025
Revised manuscript accepted for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
Our study created a high-resolution soil moisture dataset for the eastern U.S. by integrating satellite data with a land surface model and advanced algorithms, achieving 1-km scale analyses. Validated against multiple networks and datasets, it demonstrated superior accuracy. This dataset is vital for understanding soil moisture dynamics, especially during droughts, and highlights the need for improved modeling of clay soils to refine future predictions.
Qike Yang, Chun Zhao, Jiawang Feng, Gudongze Li, Jun Gu, Zihan Xia, Mingyue Xu, and Zining Yang
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 5373–5396, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-5373-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-5373-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of unstructured meshes using the integrated Atmospheric Model Across Scales (iAMAS) over Antarctica, encompassing both surface and upper-level meteorological fields. Comparisons with the fifth-generation reanalysis (ERA5) from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts and observational data indicate that iAMAS performs well in simulating the Antarctic atmosphere.
Zeli Tan, Donghui Xu, Sourav Taraphdar, Jiangqin Ma, Gautam Bisht, and L. Ruby Leung
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 3833–3852, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3833-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3833-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Flow depth and velocity determine various river functions, but their high-resolution simulations are expensive. Here, we developed a downscaling approach that can provide fast and accurate estimation of high-resolution river hydrodynamics. The 84-fold acceleration achieved by the method makes reliable flood risk analysis that needs hundreds or thousands of model runs feasible. More importantly, it provides an opportunity to couple large-scale hydrodynamics with local processes in river models.
Zining Yang, Qiuyan Du, Qike Yang, Chun Zhao, Gudongze Li, Zihan Xia, Mingyue Xu, Renmin Yuan, Yubin Li, Kaihui Xia, Jun Gu, and Jiawang Feng
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 8831–8857, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-8831-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-8831-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates the impact of turbulent mixing on black carbon (BC) concentrations in urban areas simulated at 25, 5, and 1 km resolutions. Significant variations in BC and turbulent mixing occur mainly at night. Higher resolutions reduce BC overestimation due to enhanced mixing coefficients and vertical wind fluxes. Small-scale eddies at higher resolutions increase the BC lifetime and column concentrations. Land use and terrain variations across multiple resolutions affect turbulent mixing.
Jianfeng Li, Andrew Geiss, Zhe Feng, L. Ruby Leung, Yun Qian, and Wenjun Cui
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 3721–3740, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-3721-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-3721-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a high-resolution (4 km and hourly) observational derecho dataset over the United States east of the Rocky Mountains from 2004 to 2021 by using a mesoscale convective system dataset, bow echoes detected by a machine learning method, hourly gust speeds, and physically based identification criteria.
Chang Liao, L. Ruby Leung, Yilin Fang, Teklu Tesfa, and Robinson Negron-Juarez
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4601–4624, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4601-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4601-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding horizontal groundwater flow is important for understanding how water moves through the ground. Current climate models often simplify this process because they do not have information about the land surface that is detailed enough. Our study developed a new model that divides the land surface into hillslopes to better represent how groundwater flows. This model can help improve predictions of water availability and how it affects ecosystems.
Zihan Xia, Chun Zhao, Zining Yang, Qiuyan Du, Jiawang Feng, Chen Jin, Jun Shi, and Hong An
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 6197–6218, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6197-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6197-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Traditional numerical schemes of aerosol chemistry and interactions (ACI) in atmospheric models are computationally costly and are often simplified or omitted, introducing uncertainties. We use an AI scheme to achieve fast, accurate, and stable end-to-end simulation for full ACI within an atmospheric model, replacing numerical schemes. This innovation is expected to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of ACI simulations in climate models that would otherwise neglect or simplify ACI processes.
Lingbo Li, Hong-Yi Li, Guta Abeshu, Jinyun Tang, L. Ruby Leung, Chang Liao, Zeli Tan, Hanqin Tian, Peter Thornton, and Xiaojuan Yang
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 2713–2733, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2713-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2713-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We have developed new maps that reveal how organic carbon from soil leaches into headwater streams over the contiguous United States. We use advanced artificial intelligence techniques and a massive amount of data, including observations at over 2500 gauges and a wealth of climate and environmental information. The maps are a critical step in understanding and predicting how carbon moves through our environment, hence making them a useful tool for tackling climate challenges.
Vincent Larson, Zhun Guo, Benjamin Stephens, Colin Zarzycki, Gerhard Dikta, Yun Qian, and Shaocheng Xie
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1593, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1593, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Global models of the atmosphere contain errors that lead to inaccurate simulations. A software tool ("QuadTune") is presented that attempts to mitigate some of the inaccuracies. It also displays diagnostic plots that provide hints about where the errors might lie in the model.
Ci Song, Daniel T. McCoy, Isabel L. McCoy, Hunter Brown, Andrew Gettelman, Trude Eidhammer, and Donifan Barahona
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2009, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2009, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study examines how aerosols from human activities alter cloud microphysical properties. Airborne observations from a field campaign are used to constrain an ensemble of global model configurations and their associated cloud property changes. Results show that airborne in-situ measurements of aerosol and cloud properties do provide insight into global changes in cloud microphysics but are sensitive to uncertainties in both airborne measurements and Earth system model emulators.
Naser Mahfouz, Hassan Beydoun, Johannes Mülmenstädt, Noel Keen, Adam C. Varble, Luca Bertagna, Peter Bogenschutz, Andrew Bradley, Matthew W. Christensen, T. Conrad Clevenger, Aaron Donahue, Jerome Fast, James Foucar, Jean-Christophe Golaz, Oksana Guba, Walter Hannah, Benjamin Hillman, Robert Jacob, Wuyin Lin, Po-Lun Ma, Yun Qian, Balwinder Singh, Christopher Terai, Hailong Wang, Mingxuan Wu, Kai Zhang, Andrew Gettelman, Mark Taylor, L. Ruby Leung, Peter Caldwell, and Susannah Burrows
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1868, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1868, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Our study assesses the aerosol effective radiative forcing in a global cloud-resolving atmosphere model at ultra-high resolution. We demonstrate that global ERFaer signal can be robustly reproduced across resolutions when aerosol activation processes are carefully parameterized. Further, we argue that simplified prescribed aerosol schemes will open the door for further process/mechanism studies under controlled conditions.
August Mikkelsen, Daniel T. McCoy, Trude Eidhammer, Andrew Gettelman, Ci Song, Hamish Gordon, and Isabel L. McCoy
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 4547–4570, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4547-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4547-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Whether increased aerosol increases or decreases liquid cloud mass has been a longstanding question. Observed correlations suggest that aerosols thin liquid cloud, but we are able to show that observations were consistent with an increase in liquid cloud in response to aerosols by leveraging a model where causality could be traced.
Pengfei Shi, L. Ruby Leung, and Bin Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2443–2460, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2443-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2443-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Improving climate predictions has significant socio-economic impacts. In this study, we develop and apply a new weakly coupled ocean data assimilation (WCODA) system to a coupled climate model. The WCODA system improves simulations of ocean temperature and salinity across many global regions. This system is meant to advance our understanding of the ocean's role in climate predictability.
Guta Wakbulcho Abeshu, Hong-Yi Li, Mingjie Shi, and L. Ruby Leung
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1847–1864, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1847-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1847-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study examined how water availability, climate dryness, and plant productivity interact at the catchment scale. Using various indices and statistical methods, we found a 0–2-month lag in these interactions. Strong correlations during peak-productivity months were observed, with a notable hysteresis effect in vegetation response to changes in water availability and climate dryness. The findings help better understand catchment responses to climate variability.
Katherine M. Smith, Alice M. Barthel, LeAnn M. Conlon, Luke P. Van Roekel, Anthony Bartoletti, Jean-Christophe Golaz, Chengzhu Zhang, Carolyn Branecky Begeman, James J. Benedict, Gautam Bisht, Yan Feng, Walter Hannah, Bryce E. Harrop, Nicole Jeffery, Wuyin Lin, Po-Lun Ma, Mathew E. Maltrud, Mark R. Petersen, Balwinder Singh, Qi Tang, Teklu Tesfa, Jonathan D. Wolfe, Shaocheng Xie, Xue Zheng, Karthik Balaguru, Oluwayemi Garuba, Peter Gleckler, Aixue Hu, Jiwoo Lee, Ben Moore-Maley, and Ana C. Ordoñez
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1613–1633, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1613-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1613-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Version 2.1 of the U.S. Department of Energy's Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) adds the Fox-Kemper et al. (2011) mixed-layer eddy parameterization, which restratifies the ocean surface layer through an overturning streamfunction. Results include surface layer bias reduction in temperature, salinity, and sea ice extent in the North Atlantic; a small strengthening of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation; and improvements to many atmospheric climatological variables.
Malcolm J. Roberts, Kevin A. Reed, Qing Bao, Joseph J. Barsugli, Suzana J. Camargo, Louis-Philippe Caron, Ping Chang, Cheng-Ta Chen, Hannah M. Christensen, Gokhan Danabasoglu, Ivy Frenger, Neven S. Fučkar, Shabeh ul Hasson, Helene T. Hewitt, Huanping Huang, Daehyun Kim, Chihiro Kodama, Michael Lai, Lai-Yung Ruby Leung, Ryo Mizuta, Paulo Nobre, Pablo Ortega, Dominique Paquin, Christopher D. Roberts, Enrico Scoccimarro, Jon Seddon, Anne Marie Treguier, Chia-Ying Tu, Paul A. Ullrich, Pier Luigi Vidale, Michael F. Wehner, Colin M. Zarzycki, Bosong Zhang, Wei Zhang, and Ming Zhao
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1307–1332, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1307-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1307-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
HighResMIP2 is a model intercomparison project focusing on high-resolution global climate models, that is, those with grid spacings of 25 km or less in the atmosphere and ocean, using simulations of decades to a century in length. We are proposing an update of our simulation protocol to make the models more applicable to key questions for climate variability and hazard in present-day and future projections and to build links with other communities to provide more robust climate information.
Xia Wang, Tao Che, Xueyin Ruan, Shanna Yue, Jing Wang, Chun Zhao, and Lei Geng
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 651–670, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-651-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-651-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We employed the WRF-Chem model to parameterize atmospheric nitrate deposition in snow and evaluate its performance in simulating snow cover, snow depth, and concentrations of dust and nitrate using new observations from northern China. The results generally exhibit reasonable agreement with field observations in northern China, demonstrating the model's capability to simulate snow properties, including concentrations of reservoir species.
Jiawang Feng, Chun Zhao, Qiuyan Du, Zining Yang, and Chen Jin
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 585–603, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-585-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-585-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we improved the calculation of how aerosols in the air interact with radiation in WRF-Chem. The original model used a simplified method, but we developed a more accurate approach. We found that this method significantly changes the properties of the estimated aerosols and their effects on radiation, especially for dust aerosols. It also impacts the simulated weather conditions. Our work highlights the importance of correctly representing aerosol–radiation interactions in models.
Jiawang Feng, Chun Zhao, Jun Gu, Gudongze Li, Mingyue Xu, Shengfu Lin, and Jie Feng
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4037, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4037, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Climate models help study aerosol impacts on regional climate. However, the atmosphere's chaotic nature makes it hard to separate true aerosol impacts from chaotic effects. Our ensemble experiments show that while large-scale aerosol effects are consistent, regional aerosol impacts vary significantly among experiments. We give a formula showing the relationship between chaotic effects and ensemble sizes, emphasizing the necessity of adequate ensemble members to capture reliable aerosol impacts.
Sheng-Lun Tai, Zhao Yang, Brian Gaudet, Koichi Sakaguchi, Larry Berg, Colleen Kaul, Yun Qian, Ye Liu, and Jerome Fast
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-599, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-599, 2025
Revised manuscript accepted for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
Our study created a high-resolution soil moisture dataset for the eastern U.S. by integrating satellite data with a land surface model and advanced algorithms, achieving 1-km scale analyses. Validated against multiple networks and datasets, it demonstrated superior accuracy. This dataset is vital for understanding soil moisture dynamics, especially during droughts, and highlights the need for improved modeling of clay soils to refine future predictions.
Weiyu Zhang, Kwinten Van Weverberg, Cyril J. Morcrette, Wuhu Feng, Kalli Furtado, Paul R. Field, Chih-Chieh Chen, Andrew Gettelman, Piers M. Forster, Daniel R. Marsh, and Alexandru Rap
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 473–489, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-473-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-473-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Contrail cirrus is the largest, but also most uncertain, contribution of aviation to global warming. We evaluate, for the first time, the impact of the host climate model on contrail cirrus properties. Substantial differences exist between contrail cirrus formation, persistence, and radiative effects in the host climate models. Reliable contrail cirrus simulations require advanced representation of cloud optical properties and microphysics, which should be better constrained by observations.
Yilin Fang, Hoang Viet Tran, and L. Ruby Leung
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 19–32, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-19-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-19-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Hurricanes may worsen water quality in the lower Mississippi River basin (LMRB) by increasing nutrient runoff. We found that runoff parameterizations greatly affect nitrate–nitrogen runoff simulated using an Earth system land model. Our simulations predicted increased nitrogen runoff in the LMRB during Hurricane Ida in 2021, albeit less pronounced than the observations, indicating areas for model improvement to better understand and manage nutrient runoff loss during hurricanes in the region.
Johannes Mülmenstädt, Andrew S. Ackerman, Ann M. Fridlind, Meng Huang, Po-Lun Ma, Naser Mahfouz, Susanne E. Bauer, Susannah M. Burrows, Matthew W. Christensen, Sudhakar Dipu, Andrew Gettelman, L. Ruby Leung, Florian Tornow, Johannes Quaas, Adam C. Varble, Hailong Wang, Kai Zhang, and Youtong Zheng
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 13633–13652, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13633-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13633-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Stratocumulus clouds play a large role in Earth's climate by reflecting incoming solar energy back to space. Turbulence at stratocumulus cloud top mixes in dry, warm air, which can lead to cloud dissipation. This process is challenging for coarse-resolution global models to represent. We show that global models nevertheless agree well with our process understanding. Global models also think the process is less important for the climate than other lines of evidence have led us to conclude.
Fang Li, Xiang Song, Sandy P. Harrison, Jennifer R. Marlon, Zhongda Lin, L. Ruby Leung, Jörg Schwinger, Virginie Marécal, Shiyu Wang, Daniel S. Ward, Xiao Dong, Hanna Lee, Lars Nieradzik, Sam S. Rabin, and Roland Séférian
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8751–8771, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8751-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8751-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study provides the first comprehensive assessment of historical fire simulations from 19 Earth system models in phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). Most models reproduce global totals, spatial patterns, seasonality, and regional historical changes well but fail to simulate the recent decline in global burned area and underestimate the fire response to climate variability. CMIP6 simulations address three critical issues of phase-5 models.
Fan Mei, Jennifer M. Comstock, Mikhail S. Pekour, Jerome D. Fast, Krista L. Gaustad, Beat Schmid, Shuaiqi Tang, Damao Zhang, John E. Shilling, Jason M. Tomlinson, Adam C. Varble, Jian Wang, L. Ruby Leung, Lawrence Kleinman, Scot Martin, Sebastien C. Biraud, Brian D. Ermold, and Kenneth W. Burk
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 5429–5448, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-5429-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-5429-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Our study explores a comprehensive dataset from airborne field studies (2013–2018) conducted using the US Department of Energy's Gulfstream 1 (G-1). The 236 flights span diverse regions, including the Arctic, US Southern Great Plains, US West Coast, eastern North Atlantic, Amazon Basin in Brazil, and Sierras de Córdoba range in Argentina. This dataset provides unique insights into atmospheric dynamics, aerosols, and clouds and makes data available in a more accessible format.
Andrew Gettelman, Richard Forbes, Roger Marchand, Chih-Chieh Chen, and Mark Fielding
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8069–8092, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8069-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8069-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Supercooled liquid clouds (liquid clouds colder than 0°C) are common at higher latitudes (especially over the Southern Ocean) and are critical for constraining climate projections. We compare a single-column version of a weather model to observations with two different cloud schemes and find that both the dynamical environment and atmospheric aerosols are important for reproducing observations.
Trude Eidhammer, Andrew Gettelman, Katherine Thayer-Calder, Duncan Watson-Parris, Gregory Elsaesser, Hugh Morrison, Marcus van Lier-Walqui, Ci Song, and Daniel McCoy
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7835–7853, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7835-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7835-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We describe a dataset where 45 parameters related to cloud processes in the Community Earth System Model version 2 (CESM2) Community Atmosphere Model version 6 (CAM6) are perturbed. Three sets of perturbed parameter ensembles (263 members) were created: current climate, preindustrial aerosol loading and future climate with sea surface temperature increased by 4 K.
Joshua P. French, Piotr S. Kokoszka, and Seth McGinnis
Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 10, 123–141, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-10-123-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-10-123-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Future climate behavior is typically modeled using computer-based simulations, which are generated for both historical and future time periods. The trustworthiness of these models can be assessed by determining whether the simulated historical climate matches what was observed. We provide a tool that allows researchers to identify major differences between observed climate and climate model predictions, which will hopefully lead to further model refinements.
Colin M. Zarzycki, Benjamin D. Ascher, Alan M. Rhoades, and Rachel R. McCrary
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3315–3335, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3315-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3315-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We developed an automated workflow to detect rain-on-snow events, which cause flooding in the northeastern United States, in climate data. Analyzing the Susquehanna River basin, this technique identified known events affecting river flow. Comparing four gridded datasets revealed variations in event frequency and severity, driven by different snowmelt and runoff estimates. This highlights the need for accurate climate data in flood management and risk prediction for these compound extremes.
Dongyu Feng, Zeli Tan, Darren Engwirda, Jonathan D. Wolfe, Donghui Xu, Chang Liao, Gautam Bisht, James J. Benedict, Tian Zhou, Mithun Deb, Hong-Yi Li, and L. Ruby Leung
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2785, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2785, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Our study explores how riverine and coastal flooding during hurricanes is influenced by the interaction of atmosphere, land, river and ocean conditions. Using an advanced Earth system model, we simulate Hurricane Irene to evaluate how meteorological and hydrological uncertainties affect flood modeling. Our findings reveal the importance of a multi-component modeling system, how hydrological conditions play critical roles in flood modeling, and greater flood risks if multiple factors are present.
Johannes Mülmenstädt, Edward Gryspeerdt, Sudhakar Dipu, Johannes Quaas, Andrew S. Ackerman, Ann M. Fridlind, Florian Tornow, Susanne E. Bauer, Andrew Gettelman, Yi Ming, Youtong Zheng, Po-Lun Ma, Hailong Wang, Kai Zhang, Matthew W. Christensen, Adam C. Varble, L. Ruby Leung, Xiaohong Liu, David Neubauer, Daniel G. Partridge, Philip Stier, and Toshihiko Takemura
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 7331–7345, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7331-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7331-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Human activities release copious amounts of small particles called aerosols into the atmosphere. These particles change how much sunlight clouds reflect to space, an important human perturbation of the climate, whose magnitude is highly uncertain. We found that the latest climate models show a negative correlation but a positive causal relationship between aerosols and cloud water. This means we need to be very careful when we interpret observational studies that can only see correlation.
Tapio Schneider, L. Ruby Leung, and Robert C. J. Wills
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 7041–7062, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7041-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7041-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Climate models are crucial for predicting climate change in detail. This paper proposes a balanced approach to improving their accuracy by combining traditional process-based methods with modern artificial intelligence (AI) techniques while maximizing the resolution to allow for ensemble simulations. The authors propose using AI to learn from both observational and simulated data while incorporating existing physical knowledge to reduce data demands and improve climate prediction reliability.
Piers M. Forster, Chris Smith, Tristram Walsh, William F. Lamb, Robin Lamboll, Bradley Hall, Mathias Hauser, Aurélien Ribes, Debbie Rosen, Nathan P. Gillett, Matthew D. Palmer, Joeri Rogelj, Karina von Schuckmann, Blair Trewin, Myles Allen, Robbie Andrew, Richard A. Betts, Alex Borger, Tim Boyer, Jiddu A. Broersma, Carlo Buontempo, Samantha Burgess, Chiara Cagnazzo, Lijing Cheng, Pierre Friedlingstein, Andrew Gettelman, Johannes Gütschow, Masayoshi Ishii, Stuart Jenkins, Xin Lan, Colin Morice, Jens Mühle, Christopher Kadow, John Kennedy, Rachel E. Killick, Paul B. Krummel, Jan C. Minx, Gunnar Myhre, Vaishali Naik, Glen P. Peters, Anna Pirani, Julia Pongratz, Carl-Friedrich Schleussner, Sonia I. Seneviratne, Sophie Szopa, Peter Thorne, Mahesh V. M. Kovilakam, Elisa Majamäki, Jukka-Pekka Jalkanen, Margreet van Marle, Rachel M. Hoesly, Robert Rohde, Dominik Schumacher, Guido van der Werf, Russell Vose, Kirsten Zickfeld, Xuebin Zhang, Valérie Masson-Delmotte, and Panmao Zhai
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 2625–2658, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2625-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2625-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper tracks some key indicators of global warming through time, from 1850 through to the end of 2023. It is designed to give an authoritative estimate of global warming to date and its causes. We find that in 2023, global warming reached 1.3 °C and is increasing at over 0.2 °C per decade. This is caused by all-time-high greenhouse gas emissions.
Soyoung Ha, Jonathan J. Guerrette, Ivette Hernández Baños, William C. Skamarock, and Michael G. Duda
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4199–4211, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4199-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4199-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
To mitigate the imbalances in the initial conditions, this study introduces our recent implementation of the incremental analysis update (IAU) in the Model for Prediction Across Scales – Atmospheric (MPAS-A) component coupled with the Joint Effort for Data assimilation Integration (JEDI) through the cycling system. A month-long cycling run demonstrates the successful implementation of the IAU capability in the MPAS–JEDI cycling system.
Byoung-Joo Jung, Benjamin Ménétrier, Chris Snyder, Zhiquan Liu, Jonathan J. Guerrette, Junmei Ban, Ivette Hernández Baños, Yonggang G. Yu, and William C. Skamarock
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3879–3895, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3879-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3879-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We describe the multivariate static background error covariance (B) for the JEDI-MPAS 3D-Var data assimilation system. With tuned B parameters, the multivariate B gives physically balanced analysis increment fields in the single-observation test framework. In the month-long cycling experiment with a global 60 km mesh, 3D-Var with static B performs stably. Due to its simple workflow and minimal computational requirements, JEDI-MPAS 3D-Var can be useful for the research community.
Lingcheng Li, Gautam Bisht, Dalei Hao, and L. Ruby Leung
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 2007–2032, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2007-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2007-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study fills a gap to meet the emerging needs of kilometer-scale Earth system modeling by developing global 1 km land surface parameters for land use, vegetation, soil, and topography. Our demonstration simulations highlight the substantial impacts of these parameters on spatial variability and information loss in water and energy simulations. Using advanced explainable machine learning methods, we identified influential factors driving spatial variability and information loss.
Bryce E. Harrop, Jian Lu, L. Ruby Leung, William K. M. Lau, Kyu-Myong Kim, Brian Medeiros, Brian J. Soden, Gabriel A. Vecchi, Bosong Zhang, and Balwinder Singh
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3111–3135, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3111-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3111-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Seven new experimental setups designed to interfere with cloud radiative heating have been added to the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM). These experiments include both those that test the mean impact of cloud radiative heating and those examining its covariance with circulations. This paper documents the code changes and steps needed to run these experiments. Results corroborate prior findings for how cloud radiative heating impacts circulations and rainfall patterns.
Pengfei Shi, L. Ruby Leung, Bin Wang, Kai Zhang, Samson M. Hagos, and Shixuan Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3025–3040, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3025-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3025-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Improving climate predictions have profound socio-economic impacts. This study introduces a new weakly coupled land data assimilation (WCLDA) system for a coupled climate model. We demonstrate improved simulation of soil moisture and temperature in many global regions and throughout the soil layers. Furthermore, significant improvements are also found in reproducing the time evolution of the 2012 US Midwest drought. The WCLDA system provides the groundwork for future predictability studies.
Justin L. Willson, Kevin A. Reed, Christiane Jablonowski, James Kent, Peter H. Lauritzen, Ramachandran Nair, Mark A. Taylor, Paul A. Ullrich, Colin M. Zarzycki, David M. Hall, Don Dazlich, Ross Heikes, Celal Konor, David Randall, Thomas Dubos, Yann Meurdesoif, Xi Chen, Lucas Harris, Christian Kühnlein, Vivian Lee, Abdessamad Qaddouri, Claude Girard, Marco Giorgetta, Daniel Reinert, Hiroaki Miura, Tomoki Ohno, and Ryuji Yoshida
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2493–2507, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2493-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2493-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate simulation of tropical cyclones (TCs) is essential to understanding their behavior in a changing climate. One way this is accomplished is through model intercomparison projects, where results from multiple climate models are analyzed to provide benchmark solutions for the wider climate modeling community. This study describes and analyzes the previously developed TC test case for nine climate models in an intercomparison project, providing solutions that aid in model development.
Yawen Liu, Yun Qian, Philip J. Rasch, Kai Zhang, Lai-yung Ruby Leung, Yuhang Wang, Minghuai Wang, Hailong Wang, Xin Huang, and Xiu-Qun Yang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 3115–3128, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3115-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3115-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Fire management has long been a challenge. Here we report that spring-peak fire activity over southern Mexico and Central America (SMCA) has a distinct quasi-biennial signal by measuring multiple fire metrics. This signal is initially driven by quasi-biennial variability in precipitation and is further amplified by positive feedback of fire–precipitation interaction at short timescales. This work highlights the importance of fire–climate interactions in shaping fires on an interannual scale.
Skyler Graap and Colin M. Zarzycki
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1627–1650, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1627-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1627-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A key target for improving climate models is how low, bright clouds are predicted over tropical oceans, since they have important consequences for the Earth's energy budget. A climate model has been updated to improve the physical realism of the treatment of how momentum is moved up and down in the atmosphere. By comparing this updated model to real-world observations from balloon launches, it can be shown to more accurately depict atmospheric structure in trade-wind areas close to the Equator.
Donghui Xu, Gautam Bisht, Zeli Tan, Chang Liao, Tian Zhou, Hong-Yi Li, and L. Ruby Leung
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1197–1215, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1197-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1197-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We aim to disentangle the hydrological and hydraulic controls on streamflow variability in a fully coupled earth system model. We found that calibrating only one process (i.e., traditional calibration procedure) will result in unrealistic parameter values and poor performance of the water cycle, while the simulated streamflow is improved. To address this issue, we further proposed a two-step calibration procedure to reconcile the impacts from hydrological and hydraulic processes on streamflow.
Calvin Howes, Pablo E. Saide, Hugh Coe, Amie Dobracki, Steffen Freitag, Jim M. Haywood, Steven G. Howell, Siddhant Gupta, Janek Uin, Mary Kacarab, Chongai Kuang, L. Ruby Leung, Athanasios Nenes, Greg M. McFarquhar, James Podolske, Jens Redemann, Arthur J. Sedlacek, Kenneth L. Thornhill, Jenny P. S. Wong, Robert Wood, Huihui Wu, Yang Zhang, Jianhao Zhang, and Paquita Zuidema
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 13911–13940, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13911-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13911-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
To better understand smoke properties and its interactions with clouds, we compare the WRF-CAM5 model with observations from ORACLES, CLARIFY, and LASIC field campaigns in the southeastern Atlantic in August 2017. The model transports and mixes smoke well but does not fully capture some important processes. These include smoke chemical and physical aging over 4–12 days, smoke removal by rain, sulfate particle formation, aerosol activation into cloud droplets, and boundary layer turbulence.
Dongyu Feng, Zeli Tan, Donghui Xu, and L. Ruby Leung
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3911–3934, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3911-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3911-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study assesses the flood risks concurrently induced by river flooding and coastal storm surge along the coast of the contiguous United States using statistical and numerical models. We reveal a few hotspots of such risks, the critical spatial variabilities within a river basin and over the whole US coast, and the uncertainties of the risk assessment. We highlight the importance of weighing different risk measures to avoid underestimating or exaggerating the compound flood impacts.
Andrew Gettelman
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4937–4956, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4937-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4937-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
A representation of rainbows is developed for a climate model. The diagnostic raises many common issues. Simulated rainbows are evaluated against limited observations. The pattern of rainbows in the model matches observations and theory about when and where rainbows are most common. The diagnostic is used to assess the past and future state of rainbows. Changes to clouds from climate change are expected to increase rainbows as cloud cover decreases in a warmer world.
Lingcheng Li, Yilin Fang, Zhonghua Zheng, Mingjie Shi, Marcos Longo, Charles D. Koven, Jennifer A. Holm, Rosie A. Fisher, Nate G. McDowell, Jeffrey Chambers, and L. Ruby Leung
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4017–4040, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4017-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4017-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Accurately modeling plant coexistence in vegetation demographic models like ELM-FATES is challenging. This study proposes a repeatable method that uses machine-learning-based surrogate models to optimize plant trait parameters in ELM-FATES. Our approach significantly improves plant coexistence modeling, thus reducing errors. It has important implications for modeling ecosystem dynamics in response to climate change.
Qi Tang, Jean-Christophe Golaz, Luke P. Van Roekel, Mark A. Taylor, Wuyin Lin, Benjamin R. Hillman, Paul A. Ullrich, Andrew M. Bradley, Oksana Guba, Jonathan D. Wolfe, Tian Zhou, Kai Zhang, Xue Zheng, Yunyan Zhang, Meng Zhang, Mingxuan Wu, Hailong Wang, Cheng Tao, Balwinder Singh, Alan M. Rhoades, Yi Qin, Hong-Yi Li, Yan Feng, Yuying Zhang, Chengzhu Zhang, Charles S. Zender, Shaocheng Xie, Erika L. Roesler, Andrew F. Roberts, Azamat Mametjanov, Mathew E. Maltrud, Noel D. Keen, Robert L. Jacob, Christiane Jablonowski, Owen K. Hughes, Ryan M. Forsyth, Alan V. Di Vittorio, Peter M. Caldwell, Gautam Bisht, Renata B. McCoy, L. Ruby Leung, and David C. Bader
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3953–3995, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3953-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3953-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
High-resolution simulations are superior to low-resolution ones in capturing regional climate changes and climate extremes. However, uniformly reducing the grid size of a global Earth system model is too computationally expensive. We provide an overview of the fully coupled regionally refined model (RRM) of E3SMv2 and document a first-of-its-kind set of climate production simulations using RRM at an economic cost. The key to this success is our innovative hybrid time step method.
Zhe Feng, Joseph Hardin, Hannah C. Barnes, Jianfeng Li, L. Ruby Leung, Adam Varble, and Zhixiao Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2753–2776, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2753-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2753-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
PyFLEXTRKR is a flexible atmospheric feature tracking framework with specific capabilities to track convective clouds from a variety of observations and model simulations. The package has a collection of multi-object identification algorithms and has been optimized for large datasets. This paper describes the algorithms and demonstrates applications for tracking deep convective cells and mesoscale convective systems from observations and model simulations at a wide range of scales.
Zeyu Xue, Paul Ullrich, and Lai-Yung Ruby Leung
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1909–1927, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1909-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1909-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We examine the sensitivity and robustness of conclusions drawn from the PGW method over the NEUS by conducting multiple PGW experiments and varying the perturbation spatial scales and choice of perturbed meteorological variables to provide a guideline for this increasingly popular regional modeling method. Overall, we recommend PGW experiments be performed with perturbations to temperature or the combination of temperature and wind at the gridpoint scale, depending on the research question.
Andrew Gettelman, Hugh Morrison, Trude Eidhammer, Katherine Thayer-Calder, Jian Sun, Richard Forbes, Zachary McGraw, Jiang Zhu, Trude Storelvmo, and John Dennis
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1735–1754, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1735-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1735-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Clouds are a critical part of weather and climate prediction. In this work, we document updates and corrections to the description of clouds used in several Earth system models. These updates include the ability to run the scheme on graphics processing units (GPUs), changes to the numerical description of precipitation, and a correction to the ice number. There are big improvements in the computational performance that can be achieved with GPU acceleration.
Hongxia Zhu, Rui Li, Shuping Yang, Chun Zhao, Zhe Jiang, and Chen Huang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 2421–2437, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-2421-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-2421-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The impacts of atmospheric dust aerosols and cloud dynamic conditions on precipitation vertical development in southeastern China were studied using multiple satellite observations. It was found that the precipitating drops under dusty conditions grow faster in the middle layer but slower in the upper and lower layers compared with their pristine counterparts. Quantitative estimation of the sensitivity of the precipitation top temperature to the dust aerosol optical depth is also provided.
Dalei Hao, Gautam Bisht, Karl Rittger, Timbo Stillinger, Edward Bair, Yu Gu, and L. Ruby Leung
The Cryosphere, 17, 673–697, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-673-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-673-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We comprehensively evaluated the snow simulations in E3SM land model over the western United States in terms of spatial patterns, temporal correlations, interannual variabilities, elevation gradients, and change with forest cover of snow properties and snow phenology. Our study underscores the need for diagnosing model biases and improving the model representations of snow properties and snow phenology in mountainous areas for more credible simulation and future projection of mountain snowpack.
Chandan Sarangi, Yun Qian, L. Ruby Leung, Yang Zhang, Yufei Zou, and Yuhang Wang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 1769–1783, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-1769-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-1769-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We show that for air quality, the densely populated eastern US may see even larger impacts of wildfires due to long-distance smoke transport and associated positive climatic impacts, partially compensating the improvements from regulations on anthropogenic emissions. This study highlights the tension between natural and anthropogenic contributions and the non-local nature of air pollution that complicate regulatory strategies for improving future regional air quality for human health.
Dalei Hao, Gautam Bisht, Karl Rittger, Edward Bair, Cenlin He, Huilin Huang, Cheng Dang, Timbo Stillinger, Yu Gu, Hailong Wang, Yun Qian, and L. Ruby Leung
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 75–94, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-75-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-75-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Snow with the highest albedo of land surface plays a vital role in Earth’s surface energy budget and water cycle. This study accounts for the impacts of snow grain shape and mixing state of light-absorbing particles with snow on snow albedo in the E3SM land model. The findings advance our understanding of the role of snow grain shape and mixing state of LAP–snow in land surface processes and offer guidance for improving snow simulations and radiative forcing estimates in Earth system models.
Xingying Huang, Andrew Gettelman, William C. Skamarock, Peter Hjort Lauritzen, Miles Curry, Adam Herrington, John T. Truesdale, and Michael Duda
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8135–8151, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8135-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8135-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We focus on the recent development of a state-of-the-art storm-resolving global climate model and investigate how this next-generation model performs for precipitation prediction over the western USA. Results show realistic representations of precipitation with significantly enhanced snowpack over complex terrains. The model evaluation advances the unified modeling of large-scale forcing constraints and realistic fine-scale features to advance multi-scale climate predictions and changes.
Dongyu Feng, Zeli Tan, Darren Engwirda, Chang Liao, Donghui Xu, Gautam Bisht, Tian Zhou, Hong-Yi Li, and L. Ruby Leung
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5473–5491, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5473-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5473-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Sea level rise, storm surge and river discharge can cause coastal backwater effects in downstream sections of rivers, creating critical flood risks. This study simulates the backwater effects using a large-scale river model on a coastal-refined computational mesh. By decomposing the backwater drivers, we revealed their relative importance and long-term variations. Our analysis highlights the increasing strength of backwater effects due to sea level rise and more frequent storm surge.
Yilin Fang, L. Ruby Leung, Charles D. Koven, Gautam Bisht, Matteo Detto, Yanyan Cheng, Nate McDowell, Helene Muller-Landau, S. Joseph Wright, and Jeffrey Q. Chambers
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7879–7901, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7879-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7879-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We develop a model that integrates an Earth system model with a three-dimensional hydrology model to explicitly resolve hillslope topography and water flow underneath the land surface to understand how local-scale hydrologic processes modulate vegetation along water availability gradients. Our coupled model can be used to improve the understanding of the diverse impact of local heterogeneity and water flux on nutrient availability and plant communities.
Meng Huang, Po-Lun Ma, Nathaniel W. Chaney, Dalei Hao, Gautam Bisht, Megan D. Fowler, Vincent E. Larson, and L. Ruby Leung
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6371–6384, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6371-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6371-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The land surface in one grid cell may be diverse in character. This study uses an explicit way to account for that subgrid diversity in a state-of-the-art Earth system model (ESM) and explores its implications for the overlying atmosphere. We find that the shallow clouds are increased significantly with the land surface diversity. Our work highlights the importance of accurately representing the land surface and its interaction with the atmosphere in next-generation ESMs.
Yilin Fang, L. Ruby Leung, Ryan Knox, Charlie Koven, and Ben Bond-Lamberty
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6385–6398, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6385-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6385-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Accounting for water movement in the soil and water transport within the plant is important for plant growth in Earth system modeling. We implemented different numerical approaches for a plant hydrodynamic model and compared their impacts on the simulated aboveground biomass (AGB) at single points and globally. We found care should be taken when discretizing the number of soil layers for numerical simulations as it can significantly affect AGB if accuracy and computational costs are of concern.
Xueyin Ruan, Chun Zhao, Rahul A. Zaveri, Pengzhen He, Xinming Wang, Jingyuan Shao, and Lei Geng
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6143–6164, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6143-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6143-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate prediction of aerosol pH in chemical transport models is essential to aerosol modeling. This study examines the performance of the Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled with Chemistry (WRF-Chem) on aerosol pH predictions and the sensitivities to emissions of nonvolatile cations and NH3, aerosol-phase state assumption, and heterogeneous sulfate production. Temporal evolution of aerosol pH during haze cycles in Beijing and the driving factors are also presented and discussed.
Sol Kim, L. Ruby Leung, Bin Guan, and John C. H. Chiang
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5461–5480, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5461-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5461-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) project is a state-of-the-science Earth system model developed by the US Department of Energy (DOE). Understanding how the water cycle behaves in this model is of particular importance to the DOE’s mission. Atmospheric rivers (ARs) – which are crucial to the global water cycle – move vast amounts of water vapor through the sky and produce rain and snow. We find that this model reliably represents atmospheric rivers around the world.
Lingcheng Li, Gautam Bisht, and L. Ruby Leung
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5489–5510, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5489-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5489-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Land surface heterogeneity plays a critical role in the terrestrial water, energy, and biogeochemical cycles. Our study systematically quantified the effects of four dominant heterogeneity sources on water and energy partitioning via Sobol' indices. We found that atmospheric forcing and land use land cover are the most dominant heterogeneity sources in determining spatial variability of water and energy partitioning. Our findings can help prioritize the future development of land surface models.
Kai Zhang, Wentao Zhang, Hui Wan, Philip J. Rasch, Steven J. Ghan, Richard C. Easter, Xiangjun Shi, Yong Wang, Hailong Wang, Po-Lun Ma, Shixuan Zhang, Jian Sun, Susannah M. Burrows, Manish Shrivastava, Balwinder Singh, Yun Qian, Xiaohong Liu, Jean-Christophe Golaz, Qi Tang, Xue Zheng, Shaocheng Xie, Wuyin Lin, Yan Feng, Minghuai Wang, Jin-Ho Yoon, and L. Ruby Leung
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 9129–9160, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9129-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9129-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Here we analyze the effective aerosol forcing simulated by E3SM version 1 using both century-long free-running and short nudged simulations. The aerosol forcing in E3SMv1 is relatively large compared to other models, mainly due to the large indirect aerosol effect. Aerosol-induced changes in liquid and ice cloud properties in E3SMv1 have a strong correlation. The aerosol forcing estimates in E3SMv1 are sensitive to the parameterization changes in both liquid and ice cloud processes.
Donghui Xu, Gautam Bisht, Khachik Sargsyan, Chang Liao, and L. Ruby Leung
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5021–5043, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5021-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5021-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The runoff outputs in Earth system model simulations involve high uncertainty, which needs to be constrained by parameter calibration. In this work, we used a surrogate-assisted Bayesian framework to efficiently calibrate the runoff-generation processes in the Energy Exascale Earth System Model v1 at a global scale. The model performance was improved compared to the default parameter after calibration, and the associated parametric uncertainty was significantly constrained.
Yun Lin, Jiwen Fan, Pengfei Li, Lai-yung Ruby Leung, Paul J. DeMott, Lexie Goldberger, Jennifer Comstock, Ying Liu, Jong-Hoon Jeong, and Jason Tomlinson
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 6749–6771, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-6749-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-6749-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
How sea spray aerosols may affect cloud and precipitation over the region by acting as ice-nucleating particles (INPs) is unknown. We explored the effects of INPs from marine aerosols on orographic cloud and precipitation for an atmospheric river event observed during the 2015 ACAPEX field campaign. The marine INPs enhance the formation of ice and snow, leading to less shallow warm clouds but more mixed-phase and deep clouds. This work suggests models need to consider the impacts of marine INPs.
Pinya Wang, Yang Yang, Huimin Li, Lei Chen, Ruijun Dang, Daokai Xue, Baojie Li, Jianping Tang, L. Ruby Leung, and Hong Liao
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 4705–4719, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4705-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4705-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
China is now suffering from both severe ozone (O3) pollution and heat events. We highlight that North China Plain is the hot spot of the co-occurrences of extremes in O3 and high temperatures in China. Such coupled extremes exhibit an increasing trend during 2014–2019 and will continue to increase until the middle of this century. And the coupled extremes impose more severe health impacts to human than O3 pollution occurring alone because of elevated O3 levels and temperatures.
Po-Lun Ma, Bryce E. Harrop, Vincent E. Larson, Richard B. Neale, Andrew Gettelman, Hugh Morrison, Hailong Wang, Kai Zhang, Stephen A. Klein, Mark D. Zelinka, Yuying Zhang, Yun Qian, Jin-Ho Yoon, Christopher R. Jones, Meng Huang, Sheng-Lun Tai, Balwinder Singh, Peter A. Bogenschutz, Xue Zheng, Wuyin Lin, Johannes Quaas, Hélène Chepfer, Michael A. Brunke, Xubin Zeng, Johannes Mülmenstädt, Samson Hagos, Zhibo Zhang, Hua Song, Xiaohong Liu, Michael S. Pritchard, Hui Wan, Jingyu Wang, Qi Tang, Peter M. Caldwell, Jiwen Fan, Larry K. Berg, Jerome D. Fast, Mark A. Taylor, Jean-Christophe Golaz, Shaocheng Xie, Philip J. Rasch, and L. Ruby Leung
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2881–2916, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2881-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2881-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
An alternative set of parameters for E3SM Atmospheric Model version 1 has been developed based on a tuning strategy that focuses on clouds. When clouds in every regime are improved, other aspects of the model are also improved, even though they are not the direct targets for calibration. The recalibrated model shows a lower sensitivity to anthropogenic aerosols and surface warming, suggesting potential improvements to the simulated climate in the past and future.
Sally S.-C. Wang, Yun Qian, L. Ruby Leung, and Yang Zhang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 3445–3468, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3445-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3445-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study develops an interpretable machine learning (ML) model predicting monthly PM2.5 fire emission over the contiguous US at 0.25° resolution and compares the prediction skills of the ML and process-based models. The comparison facilitates attributions of model biases and better understanding of the strengths and uncertainties in the two types of models at regional scales, for informing future model development and their applications in fire emission projection.
Guta Wakbulcho Abeshu, Hong-Yi Li, Zhenduo Zhu, Zeli Tan, and L. Ruby Leung
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 929–942, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-929-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-929-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Existing riverbed sediment particle size data are sparsely available at individual sites. We develop a continuous map of median riverbed sediment particle size over the contiguous US corresponding to millions of river segments based on the existing observations and machine learning methods. This map is useful for research in large-scale river sediment using model- and data-driven approaches, teaching environmental and earth system sciences, planning and managing floodplain zones, etc.
Hong-Yi Li, Zeli Tan, Hongbo Ma, Zhenduo Zhu, Guta Wakbulcho Abeshu, Senlin Zhu, Sagy Cohen, Tian Zhou, Donghui Xu, and L. Ruby Leung
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 665–688, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-665-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-665-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce a new multi-process river sediment module for Earth system models. Application and validation over the contiguous US indicate a satisfactory model performance over large river systems, including those heavily regulated by reservoirs. This new sediment module enables future modeling of the transportation and transformation of carbon and nutrients carried by the fine sediment along the river–ocean continuum to close the global carbon and nutrient cycles.
Ka Ming Fung, Colette L. Heald, Jesse H. Kroll, Siyuan Wang, Duseong S. Jo, Andrew Gettelman, Zheng Lu, Xiaohong Liu, Rahul A. Zaveri, Eric C. Apel, Donald R. Blake, Jose-Luis Jimenez, Pedro Campuzano-Jost, Patrick R. Veres, Timothy S. Bates, John E. Shilling, and Maria Zawadowicz
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 1549–1573, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1549-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1549-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding the natural aerosol burden in the preindustrial era is crucial for us to assess how atmospheric aerosols affect the Earth's radiative budgets. Our study explores how a detailed description of dimethyl sulfide (DMS) oxidation (implemented in the Community Atmospheric Model version 6 with chemistry, CAM6-chem) could help us better estimate the present-day and preindustrial concentrations of sulfate and other relevant chemicals, as well as the resulting aerosol radiative impacts.
Matthew W. Christensen, Andrew Gettelman, Jan Cermak, Guy Dagan, Michael Diamond, Alyson Douglas, Graham Feingold, Franziska Glassmeier, Tom Goren, Daniel P. Grosvenor, Edward Gryspeerdt, Ralph Kahn, Zhanqing Li, Po-Lun Ma, Florent Malavelle, Isabel L. McCoy, Daniel T. McCoy, Greg McFarquhar, Johannes Mülmenstädt, Sandip Pal, Anna Possner, Adam Povey, Johannes Quaas, Daniel Rosenfeld, Anja Schmidt, Roland Schrödner, Armin Sorooshian, Philip Stier, Velle Toll, Duncan Watson-Parris, Robert Wood, Mingxi Yang, and Tianle Yuan
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 641–674, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-641-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-641-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Trace gases and aerosols (tiny airborne particles) are released from a variety of point sources around the globe. Examples include volcanoes, industrial chimneys, forest fires, and ship stacks. These sources provide opportunistic experiments with which to quantify the role of aerosols in modifying cloud properties. We review the current state of understanding on the influence of aerosol on climate built from the wide range of natural and anthropogenic laboratories investigated in recent decades.
Xiaodong Wang, Chun Zhao, Mingyue Xu, Qiuyan Du, Jianqiu Zheng, Yun Bi, Shengfu Lin, and Yali Luo
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 199–218, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-199-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-199-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Regional models are widely used to investigate aerosol climatic impacts. However, there are few studies examining the sensitivities of modeling results to regional domain size. In this study, the regional model is used to study the aerosol impacts on the East Asian summer monsoon system and focus on the modeling sensitivities to domain size. This study highlights the important impacts of domain size on regional modeling results of aerosol climatic impacts, which may not be limited to East Asia.
Claudia Tebaldi, Kalyn Dorheim, Michael Wehner, and Ruby Leung
Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 1427–1501, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-1427-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-1427-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We address the question of how large an initial condition ensemble of climate model simulations should be if we are concerned with accurately projecting future changes in temperature and precipitation extremes. We find that for most cases (and both models considered), an ensemble of 20–25 members is sufficient for many extreme metrics, spatial scales and time horizons. This may leave computational resources to tackle other uncertainties in climate model simulations with our ensembles.
Dalei Hao, Gautam Bisht, Yu Gu, Wei-Liang Lee, Kuo-Nan Liou, and L. Ruby Leung
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6273–6289, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6273-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6273-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Topography exerts significant influence on the incoming solar radiation at the land surface. This study incorporated a well-validated sub-grid topographic parameterization in E3SM land model (ELM) version 1.0. The results demonstrate that sub-grid topography has non-negligible effects on surface energy budget, snow cover, and surface temperature over the Tibetan Plateau and that the ELM simulations are sensitive to season, elevation, and spatial scale.
Mingshuai Zhang, Chun Zhao, Yuhan Yang, Qiuyan Du, Yonglin Shen, Shengfu Lin, Dasa Gu, Wenjing Su, and Cheng Liu
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6155–6175, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6155-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6155-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) can influence atmospheric chemistry and secondary pollutant formation. This study examines the performance of different versions of the Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature (MEGAN) in modeling BVOCs and ozone and their sensitivities to vegetation distributions over eastern China. The results suggest more accurate vegetation distribution and measurements of BVOC emission fluxes are needed to reduce the uncertainties.
Paul A. Ullrich, Colin M. Zarzycki, Elizabeth E. McClenny, Marielle C. Pinheiro, Alyssa M. Stansfield, and Kevin A. Reed
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5023–5048, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5023-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5023-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
TempestExtremes (TE) is a multifaceted framework for feature detection, tracking, and scientific analysis of regional or global Earth system datasets. Version 2.1 of TE now provides extensive support for nodal and areal features. This paper describes the algorithms that have been added to the TE framework since version 1.0 and gives several examples of how these can be combined to produce composite algorithms for evaluating and understanding atmospheric features.
Yongkang Xue, Tandong Yao, Aaron A. Boone, Ismaila Diallo, Ye Liu, Xubin Zeng, William K. M. Lau, Shiori Sugimoto, Qi Tang, Xiaoduo Pan, Peter J. van Oevelen, Daniel Klocke, Myung-Seo Koo, Tomonori Sato, Zhaohui Lin, Yuhei Takaya, Constantin Ardilouze, Stefano Materia, Subodh K. Saha, Retish Senan, Tetsu Nakamura, Hailan Wang, Jing Yang, Hongliang Zhang, Mei Zhao, Xin-Zhong Liang, J. David Neelin, Frederic Vitart, Xin Li, Ping Zhao, Chunxiang Shi, Weidong Guo, Jianping Tang, Miao Yu, Yun Qian, Samuel S. P. Shen, Yang Zhang, Kun Yang, Ruby Leung, Yuan Qiu, Daniele Peano, Xin Qi, Yanling Zhan, Michael A. Brunke, Sin Chan Chou, Michael Ek, Tianyi Fan, Hong Guan, Hai Lin, Shunlin Liang, Helin Wei, Shaocheng Xie, Haoran Xu, Weiping Li, Xueli Shi, Paulo Nobre, Yan Pan, Yi Qin, Jeff Dozier, Craig R. Ferguson, Gianpaolo Balsamo, Qing Bao, Jinming Feng, Jinkyu Hong, Songyou Hong, Huilin Huang, Duoying Ji, Zhenming Ji, Shichang Kang, Yanluan Lin, Weiguang Liu, Ryan Muncaster, Patricia de Rosnay, Hiroshi G. Takahashi, Guiling Wang, Shuyu Wang, Weicai Wang, Xu Zhou, and Yuejian Zhu
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 4465–4494, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4465-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4465-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The subseasonal prediction of extreme hydroclimate events such as droughts/floods has remained stubbornly low for years. This paper presents a new international initiative which, for the first time, introduces spring land surface temperature anomalies over high mountains to improve precipitation prediction through remote effects of land–atmosphere interactions. More than 40 institutions worldwide are participating in this effort. The experimental protocol and preliminary results are presented.
Andrew Gettelman, Chieh-Chieh Chen, and Charles G. Bardeen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 9405–9416, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9405-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9405-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant economic disruption in 2020 and severely impacted air traffic. We use a climate model to evaluate the effect of the reductions in aviation on climate in 2020. Contrails, in general, warm the planet, and COVID-19-related reductions in contrails cooled the land surface in 2020. The timing of reductions in aviation was important, and this may change how we think about the future effects of contrails.
Jianfeng Li, Zhe Feng, Yun Qian, and L. Ruby Leung
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 827–856, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-827-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-827-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Deep convection has different properties at different scales. We develop a 4 km h−1 observational data product of mesoscale convective systems and isolated deep convection in the United States from 2004–2017. We find that both types of convective systems contribute significantly to precipitation east of the Rocky Mountains but with distinct spatiotemporal characteristics. The data product will be useful for observational analyses and model evaluations of convection events at different scales.
Zhuang Wang, Cheng Liu, Zhouqing Xie, Qihou Hu, Meinrat O. Andreae, Yunsheng Dong, Chun Zhao, Ting Liu, Yizhi Zhu, Haoran Liu, Chengzhi Xing, Wei Tan, Xiangguang Ji, Jinan Lin, and Jianguo Liu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 14917–14932, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14917-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14917-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Significant stratification of aerosols was observed in North China. Polluted dust dominated above the PBL, and anthropogenic aerosols prevailed within the PBL, which is mainly driven by meteorological conditions. The key role of the elevated dust is to alter atmospheric thermodynamics and stability, causing the suppression of turbulence exchange and a decrease in PBL height, especially during the dissipation stage, thereby inhibiting dissipation of persistent heavy surface haze pollution.
Stefan Rahimi, Xiaohong Liu, Chun Zhao, Zheng Lu, and Zachary J. Lebo
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 10911–10935, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10911-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10911-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Dark particles emitted to the atmosphere can absorb sunlight and heat the air. As these particles settle, they may darken the surface, especially over snow-covered regions like the Rocky Mountains. This darkening of the surface may lead to changes in snowpack, affecting the local meteorology and hydrology. We seek to evaluate whether these light-absorbing particles more prominently affect this region through their atmospheric presence or their on-snow presence.
Cited articles
Adler, R. F., Huffman, G. J., Chang, A., Ferrado, R., Xie, P.-P., Janowiak, J.,
Rudolf, B., Schneider, U., Curtis, S., Bolvin, D. T., Gruber, A., Susskind,
J., Arkin, P., and Nelkin, E.: The Version-2 Global Precipitation
Climatology Project (GPCP) monthly precipitation analysis (1979 – Present), J. Hydrometeorol., 4, 1147–1167, 2003. a
Allen, T., Daley, C. S., Doerfler, D., Austin, B., and Wright, N. J.:
Performance and energy usage of workloads on KNL and haswell architectures,
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in
Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10724 LNCS,
236–249, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72971-8_12, 2018. a
Bacmeister, J. T., Wehner, M. F., Neale, R. B., Gettelman, A., Hannay, C.,
Lauritzen, P. H., Caron, J. M., and Truesdale, J. E.: Exploratory
high-resolution climate simulations using the Community Atmosphere Model
(CAM), J. Climate, 27, 3073–3099, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00387.1,
2014. a, b, c
Balaji, V., Boville, B., Cheung, S., Collins, N., Cruz, C., Silva, A., Deluca,
C., Fainchtein, R. D., Eaton, B., Hallberg, B., Henderson, T., Hill, C.,
Iredell, M., Jacob, R., Jones, P., Kluzek, E., Kauffman, B., Larson, J., Li,
P., Liu, F., Michalakes, J., Murphy, S., Neckels, D., Kuinghttons, R. O.,
Oehmke, B., Panaccione, C., Rosinski, J., Sawyer, W., Schwab, E., Smithline,
S., Spector, W., Stark, D., Suarez, M., Swift, S., Theurich, G., Trayanov,
A., Vasquez, S., Wolfe, J., Yang, W., Young, M., and Zaslavsky, L.: Earth
System Modeling Framework ESMF Reference Manual for Fortran Version 7.1.0r,
Tech. rep., The Earth System Modeling Framework, https://earthsystemmodeling.org/docs/release/ESMF_7_1_0r/ESMF_refdoc.pdf (last access: 18 May 2023), 2018. a, b, c
Barnes, T., Cook, B., Deslippe, J., Doerfler, D., Friesen, B., He, Y., Kurth,
T., Koskela, T., Lobet, M., Malas, T., Oliker, L., Ovsyannikov, A., Sarje,
A., Vay, J. L., Vincenti, H., Williams, S., Carrier, P., Wichmann, N.,
Wagner, M., Kent, P., Kerr, C., and Dennis, J.: Evaluating and optimizing
the NERSC workload on knights landing, Proceedings of PMBS 2016: 7th
International Workshop on Performance Modeling, Benchmarking and Simulation
of High Performance Computing Systems – Held in conjunction with SC 2016: The
International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, St,
Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 14–14 November 2016, 43–53, https://doi.org/10.1109/PMBS.2016.010, 2017. a, b, c, d, e
Bogenschutz, P. A., Gettelman, A., Hannay, C., Larson, V. E., Neale, R. B., Craig, C., and Chen, C.-C.: The path to CAM6: coupled simulations with CAM5.4 and CAM5.5, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 235–255, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-235-2018, 2018. a, b, c
Bretherton, C. S. and Park, S.: A New Moist Turbulence Parameterization in the
Community Atmosphere Model, J. Climate, 22, 3422–3448,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2556.1, 2009. a
Brohan, P., Kennedy, J. J., Harris, I., Tett, S. F. B., and Jones, P. D.:
Uncertainty estimates in regional and global observed temperature changes: A
new data set from 1850, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D12106,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006548, 2006. a
Bukovsky, M. S., McCrary, R. R., Seth, A., and Mearns, L. O.: A
mechanistically credible, poleward shift in warm-season precipitation
projected for the U.S. Southern Great Plains?, J. Climate, 30,
8275–8298, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0316.1, 2017. a, b
CESM: CCSM4 half-degree runs,
https://www.earthsystemgrid.org/dataset/ucar.cgd.ccsm4.CCSM4-HDEG.html (last access: 19 May 2023),
2016. a
Chang, H.-i., Castro, C. L., Carrillo, C. M., and Dominguez, F.: The more
extreme nature of U.S. warm season climate in the recent observational record
and two “well‐performing” dynamically downscaled CMIP3 models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 8244–8263,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023333, 2015. a
Chen, C. T. and Knutson, T.: On the verification and comparison of extreme
rainfall indices from climate models, J. Climate, 21, 1605–1621,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI1494.1, 2008. a
Christensen, O. B., Gutowski, W. J., Nikulin, G., and Legutke, S.: CORDEX
Archive Design, Tech. Rep. March, CORDEX, https://is-enes-data.github.io/cordex_archive_specifications.pdf (last access: 18 May 2023), 2014. a
Christenson, C. E., Martin, J. E., and Handlos, Z. J.: A synoptic climatology
of Northern Hemisphere, cold season polar and subtropical jet superposition
events, J. Climate, 30, 7231–7246, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0565.1,
2017. a
Coburn, J. and Pryor, S. C.: Differential Credibility of Climate Modes in
CMIP6, J. Climate, 34, 8145–8164, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0359.1,
2021. a
CORDEX: CORDEX domains for model integrations, Tech. rep., WCRP,
https://cordex.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/CORDEX-domain-description_231015.pdf (last access: 19 May 2023),
2015. a
Cosgrove, B. A., Lohmann, D., Mitchell, K. E., Houser, P. R., Wood, E. F.,
Schaake, J. C., Robock, A., Sheffield, J., Duan, Q., Luo, L., Higgins, R. W.,
Pinker, R. T., and Tarpley, J. D.: Land surface model spin-up behavior in
the North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd003316, 2003. a
Danabasoglu, G., Lamarque, J., Bacmeister, J., Bailey, D. A., DuVivier, A. K.,
Edwards, J., Emmons, L. K., Fasullo, J., Garcia, R., Gettelman, A., Hannay,
C., Holland, M. M., Large, W. G., Lauritzen, P. H., Lawrence, D. M.,
Lenaerts, J. T. M., Lindsay, K., Lipscomb, W. H., Mills, M. J., Neale, R.,
Oleson, K. W., Otto‐Bliesner, B., Phillips, A. S., Sacks, W., Tilmes, S.,
Kampenhout, L., Vertenstein, M., Bertini, A., Dennis, J., Deser, C., Fischer,
C., Fox‐Kemper, B., Kay, J. E., Kinnison, D., Kushner, P. J., Larson,
V. E., Long, M. C., Mickelson, S., Moore, J. K., Nienhouse, E., Polvani, L.,
Rasch, P. J., and Strand, W. G.: The Community Earth System Model Version 2
(CESM2), J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, 1–35,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001916, 2020. a
Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, a. J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P., Kobayashi,
S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M. a., Balsamo, G., Bauer, P., Bechtold, P.,
Beljaars, a. C. M., van de Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N., Delsol, C.,
Dragani, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, a. J., Haimberger, L., Healy, S. B.,
Hersbach, H., Hólm, E. V., Isaksen, L., Kållberg, P., Köhler,
M., Matricardi, M., McNally, a. P., Monge-Sanz, B. M., Morcrette, J.-J.,
Park, B.-K., Peubey, C., de Rosnay, P., Tavolato, C., Thépaut, J.-N.,
and Vitart, F.: The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of
the data assimilation system,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 553–597, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828, 2011. a, b, c
Dennis, J. M., Dobbins, B., Kerr, C., and Kim, Y.: Optimizing the HOMME
dynamical core for multicore platforms,
Int. J. High Perform. C., 33, 1030–1045,
https://doi.org/10.1177/1094342019849618, 2019. a, b, c, d
Diaconescu, E. P., Gachon, P., and Laprise, R.: On the remapping procedure of
daily precipitation statistics and indices used in regional climate model
evaluation, J. Hydrometeorol., 16, 2301–2310,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-15-0025.1, 2015. a
Dong, L., Leung, L. R., Song, F., and Lu, J.: Roles of SST versus internal
atmospheric variability in winter extreme precipitation variability along the
U.S. West Coast, J. Climate, 31, 8039–8058,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0062.1, 2018. a
Duda, M. G., Fowler, L. D., Skamarock, W. C., Roesch, C., Jacobsen, D., and
Ringler, T. D.: MPAS-Atmosphere Model User's Guide Version 7.0, Tech. rep.,
NCAR, Boulder, Colo., https://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/projects/mpas/mpas_atmosphere_users_guide_7.0.pdf (last accss: 18 May 2023), 2019. a
Elshamy, M. E., Princz, D., Sapriza-Azuri, G., Abdelhamed, M. S., Pietroniro, A., Wheater, H. S., and Razavi, S.: On the configuration and initialization of a large-scale hydrological land surface model to represent permafrost, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 349–379, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-349-2020, 2020. a
English, J. M., Kay, J. E., Gettelman, A., Liu, X., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., and
Chepfer, H.: Contributions of clouds, surface albedos, and mixed-phase ice
nucleation schemes to Arctic radiation biases in CAM5, J. Climate,
27, 5174–5197, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00608.1, 2014. a
Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G. A., Senior, C. A., Stevens, B., Stouffer, R. J., and Taylor, K. E.: Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1937–1958, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016, 2016. a
Feng, Z., Song, F., Sakaguchi, K., and Leung, L. R.: Evaluation of mesoscale
convective systems in climate simulations: Methodological development and
results from MPAS-CAM over the United States, J. Climate, 34,
2611–2633, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0136.1, 2021. a, b
Fowler, H. J., Blenkinsop, S., and Tebaldi, C.: Linking climate change
modelling to impacts studies: recent advances in downscaling techniques for
hydrological modelling, Int. J. Climatol., 27,
1547–1578, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1556, 2007. a
Fowler, L. D., Skamarock, W. C., Grell, G. A., Freitas, S. R., and Duda, M. G.:
Analyzing the Grell-Freitas Convection Scheme from Hydrostatic to
Nonhydrostatic Scales within a Global Model, Mon. Weather Rev., 144,
2285–2306, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0311.1, 2016. a
Fox-Rabinovitz, M. S., Stenchikov, G. L., Suarez, Max, J., Takacs, L. L., and
Govindaraju, R. C.: A Uniform- and Variable-Resolution Stretched-Grid GCM
Dynamical Core with Realistic Orography, Mon. Weather Rev., 128,
1883–1898, 2000. a
Fox-Rabinovitz, M. S., Côté, J., Dugas, B., Déqué, M.,
and McGregor, J. L.: Variable resolution general circulation models:
Stretched-grid model intercomparison project (SGMIP),
J. Geophys. Res., 111, D16104, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006520, 2006. a
Fuhrer, O., Chadha, T., Hoefler, T., Kwasniewski, G., Lapillonne, X., Leutwyler, D., Lüthi, D., Osuna, C., Schär, C., Schulthess, T. C., and Vogt, H.: Near-global climate simulation at 1 km resolution: establishing a performance baseline on 4888 GPUs with COSMO 5.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1665–1681, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1665-2018, 2018. a
Gates, W. L.: AMIP: The Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project,
B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 73, 1962–1970, 1992. a
Geil, K. L. and Zeng, X.: Quantitative characterization of spurious numerical
oscillations in 48 CMIP5 models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 1–8,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063931, 2015. a
Gesch, D. B. and Larson, K. S.: Techniques for development of global
1-kilometer digital elevation models, in: Proc. Pecora Thirteenth Symposium, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States, 1–6, 1996. a
Gettelman, A. and Morrison, H.: Advanced two-moment bulk microphysics for
global models. Part I: Off-line tests and comparison with other schemes,
J. Climate, 28, 1268–1287, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00102.1, 2015. a, b
Gettelman, A., Morrison, H., Santos, S., Bogenschutz, P., and Caldwell, P. M.:
Advanced two-moment bulk microphysics for global models. Part II: Global
model solutions and aerosol-cloud interactions, J. Climate, 28,
1288–1307, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00103.1, 2015. a, b
Gettelman, A., Callaghan, P., Larson, V. E., Zarzycki, C. M., Bacmeister,
J. T., Lauritzen, P. H., Bogenschutz, P. A., and Neale, R. B.: Regional
Climate Simulations With the Community Earth System Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 10, 1245–1265,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS001227, 2018. a, b
Gettelman, A., Barth, M. C., Hanli, L., Skamarock, W. C., and Powers, J. G.:
The System for Integrated Modeling of the Atmosphere (SIMA): Unifying
community modeling for Weather, Climate, Air Quality and Geospace
Applications, AGU Fall Meeting 2021, New Orleans, LO, United States,
13–17 December 2021, A45O-2048, 2021. a
Giorgetta, M. A., Jungclaus, J., Reick, C. H., Legutke, S., Bader, J.,
Böttinger, M., Brovkin, V., Crueger, T., Esch, M., Fieg, K., Glushak,
K., Gayler, V., Haak, H., Hollweg, H.-D., Ilyina, T., Kinne, S., Kornblueh,
L., Matei, D., Mauritsen, T., Mikolajewicz, U., Mueller, W., Notz, D.,
Pithan, F., Raddatz, T., Rast, S., Redler, R., Roeckner, E., Schmidt, H.,
Schnur, R., Segschneider, J., Six, K. D., Stockhause, M., Timmreck, C.,
Wegner, J., Widmann, H., Wieners, K.-H., Claussen, M., Marotzke, J., and
Stevens, B.: Climate and carbon cycle changes from 1850 to 2100 in MPI-ESM
simulations for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 5, 572–597, https://doi.org/10.1002/jame.20038,
2013. a
Giorgi, F.: Thirty Years of Regional Climate Modeling: Where Are We and Where
Are We Going next?, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124,
5696–5723, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD030094, 2019. a
Giorgi, F. and Gutowski, W. J.: Regional Dynamical Downscaling and the CORDEX
Initiative, Annu. Rev. Env. Resour., 40, 467–490,
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021217, 2015. a
Giorgi, F. and Mearns, L. O.: Approaches to the simulation of regional climate
change: A review, Rev. Geophys., 29, 191–216, https://doi.org/10.1029/90RG02636,
1991. a, b
Grell, G. A. and Freitas, S. R.: A scale and aerosol aware stochastic convective parameterization for weather and air quality modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 5233–5250, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5233-2014, 2014. a
Gross, M., Wan, H., Rasch, P. J., Caldwell, P. M., Williamson, D. L., Klocke,
D., Jablonowski, C., Thatcher, D. R., Wood, N., Cullen, M., Beare, B.,
Willett, M., Lemarié, F., Blayo, E., Malardel, S., Termonia, P.,
Gassmann, A., Lauritzen, P. H., Johansen, H., Zarzycki, C. M., Sakaguchi, K.,
Leung, R., Gross, M., Wan, H., Rasch, P. J., Caldwell, P. M., Williamson,
D. L., Klocke, D., Jablonowski, C., Thatcher, D. R., Wood, N., Cullen, M.,
Beare, B., Willett, M., Lemarié, F., Blayo, E., Malardel, S., Termonia,
P., Gassmann, A., Lauritzen, P. H., Johansen, H., Zarzycki, C. M., Sakaguchi,
K., and Leung, R.: Physics–Dynamics Coupling in weather, climate and Earth
system models: Challenges and recent progress, Mon. Weather Rev., 3505–3544, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-17-0345.1, 2018. a, b, c
Gutowski Jr., W. J., Ullrich, P. A., Hall, A., Leung, L. R., O'Brien, T. A.,
Patricola, C. M., Arritt, R. W., Bukovsky, M. S., Calvin, K. V., Feng, Z.,
Jones, A. D., Kooperman, G. J., Monier, E., Pritchard, M. S., Pryor, S. C.,
Qian, Y., Rhoades, A. M., Roberts, A. F., Sakaguchi, K., Urban, N., Zarzycki,
C., O'Brien, T. A., Patricola, C. M., Arritt, R. W., Bukovsky, M. S., Calvin,
K. V., Feng, Z., Jones, A. D., Kooperman, G. J., Monier, E., Pritchard,
M. S., Pryor, S. C., Qian, Y., Rhoades, A. M., Roberts, A. F., Sakaguchi, K.,
Urban, N., Zarzycki, C., Gutowski, W. J. J., Ullrich, P. A., Hall, A., Leung,
L. R., O'Brien, T. A., Patricola, C. M., Arritt, R. W., Bukovsky, M. S.,
Calvin, K. V., Feng, Z., Jones, A. D., Kooperman, G. J., Monier, E.,
Pritchard, M. S., Pryor, S. C., Qian, Y., Rhoades, A. M., Roberts, A. F.,
Sakaguchi, K., Urban, N., and Zarzycki, C.: The Ongoing Need for
High-Resolution Regional Climate Models, American Meteorological Society,
101, 664–683, 2020. a
Haarsma, R. J., Roberts, M. J., Vidale, P. L., Senior, C. A., Bellucci, A., Bao, Q., Chang, P., Corti, S., Fučkar, N. S., Guemas, V., von Hardenberg, J., Hazeleger, W., Kodama, C., Koenigk, T., Leung, L. R., Lu, J., Luo, J.-J., Mao, J., Mizielinski, M. S., Mizuta, R., Nobre, P., Satoh, M., Scoccimarro, E., Semmler, T., Small, J., and von Storch, J.-S.: High Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP v1.0) for CMIP6, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 4185–4208, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-4185-2016, 2016. a, b, c
Hager, G. and Wellein, G.: Introduction to High Performance Computing for
Scientists and Engineers, CRC Press, Boca Raton, https://doi.org/10.1201/EBK1439811924, 2011. a, b
Hagos, S., Leung, L. R., Rauscher, S. A., and Ringler, T.: Error
characteristics of two grid refinement approaches in aquaplanet simulations:
MPAS-A and WRF, Mon. Weather Rev., 141, 3022–3036,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-12-00338.1, 2013. a, b, c
Hagos, S., Ruby Leung, L., Zhao, C., Feng, Z., and Sakaguchi, K.: How Do
Microphysical Processes Influence Large-Scale Precipitation Variability and
Extremes?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 1661–1667,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076375, 2018. a, b, c
He, H.: Advanced OpenMP and CESM Case Study,
https://www.nersc.gov/assets/Uploads/Advanced-OpenMP-CESM-NUG2016-He.pdf (last access: 20 May 2013),
2016. a
He, Y., Cook, B., Deslippe, J., Friesen, B., Gerber, R., Hartman-Baker, R.,
Koniges, A., Kurth, T., Leak, S., Yang, W.-S., Zhao, Z., Baron, E., and
Hauschildt, P.: Preparing NERSC users for Cori, a Cray XC40 system with
Intel many integrated cores, Concurr. Comp.-Pract.
E., 30, e4291, https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.4291, 2018. a, b, c
Heinzeller, D., Duda, M. G., and Kunstmann, H.: Towards convection-resolving, global atmospheric simulations with the Model for Prediction Across Scales (MPAS) v3.1: an extreme scaling experiment, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 77–110, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-77-2016, 2016. a, b
Herrington, A. R. and Reed, K. A.: On resolution sensitivity in the Community
Atmosphere Model, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146,
3789–3807, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3873, 2020. a, b, c
Hourdin, F., Mauritsen, T., Gettelman, A., Golaz, J. C., Balaji, V., Duan, Q.,
Folini, D., Ji, D., Klocke, D., Qian, Y., Rauser, F., Rio, C., Tomassini, L.,
Watanabe, M., and Williamson, D.: The art and science of climate model
tuning, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98, 589–602,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00135.1, 2017. a
Huang, X., Rhoades, A. M., Ullrich, P. A., and Zarzycki, C. M.: An evaluation
of the variable-resolution CESM for modeling California's climate, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 8, 345–369,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2013MS000282., 2016. a, b
Huang, X., Gettelman, A., Skamarock, W. C., Lauritzen, P. H., Curry, M., Herrington, A., Truesdale, J. T., and Duda, M.: Advancing precipitation prediction using a new-generation storm-resolving model framework – SIMA-MPAS (V1.0): a case study over the western United States, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8135–8151, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8135-2022, 2022. a, b
Hunke, E. C. and Lipscomb, W. H.: CICE: The Los Alamos Sea Ice Model,
Documentation and Software, Version 4.0, Tech. rep., Los Alamos National
Laboratory, Los Alamos, https://github.com/CICE-Consortium/CICE/wiki/CICE-Release-Table (last access: 18 May 2023), 2010. a
Iacono, M. J., Delamere, J. S., Mlawer, E. J., Shephard, M. W., Clough, S. A.,
and Collins, W. D.: Radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases:
Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 113, 2–9, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009944, 2008. a
Jablonowski, C. and Williamson, D. L.: The Pros and Cons of Diffusion, Filters
and Fixers in Atmospheric General CirculationModels, in: Numerical
Techniques for Global Atmospheric Models, edited by: Lauritzen, P.,
Jablonowski, C., Taylor, M., and Nair, R., vol. 80, Lecture Notes in
Computational Science and Engineering, 13, 381–493, Springer
Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11640-7, 2011. a
Jang, J., Skamarock, W. C., Park, S., Zarzycki, C. M., Sakaguchi, K., and Leung, L.
R.: Effect of the Grell-Freitas Deep Convection Scheme in Quasi-uniform and Variableresolution
Aquaplanet CAM Simulations, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., e2020MS002459,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020ms002459, 2022. a
Ji, H., Nan, Z., Hu, J., Zhao, Y., and Zhang, Y.: On the Spin‐Up Strategy
for Spatial Modeling of Permafrost Dynamics: A Case Study on the
Qinghai‐Tibet Plateau, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 14, e2021MS002750,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002750, 2022. a
Ju, L., Ringler, T., and Gunzburger, M.: Voronoi tessellations and their
application to climate and global modeling, in: Numerical Techniques for
Global Atmospheric Models, edited by: Lauritzen, P., Jablonowski, C., Taylor,
M., and Nair, R., vol. 80, Lecture Notes in Computational Science and
Engineering, 10, 313–342, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin,
Heidelberg, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11640-7, 2011. a, b
Kiehl, J. T., Schneider, T. L., Rasch, P. J., Barth, M. C., and Wong, J.:
Radiative forcing due to sulfate aerosols from simulations with the National
Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model, Version 3, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 1441–1457,
https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900495, 2000. a
King, M. D., Menzel, W. P., Kaufman, Y. J., Tanré, D., Gao, B.-c.,
Platnick, S., Ackerman, S. A., Remer, L. A., Pincus, R., and Hubanks, P. A.:
Cloud and Aerosol Properties, Precipitable Water, and Profiles of
Temperature and Water Vapor from MODIS, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 41, 442–458, 2003. a
Klemp, J. B.: A Terrain-Following Coordinate with Smoothed Coordinate
Surfaces, Mon. Weather Rev., 139, 2163–2169,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-10-05046.1, 2011. a
Lauritzen, P. H., Mirin, a. a., Truesdale, J., Raeder, K., Anderson, J. L.,
Bacmeister, J., and Neale, R. B.: Implementation of new diffusion/filtering
operators in the CAM-FV dynamical core, Int. J. High Perform. C., 26, 63–73,
https://doi.org/10.1177/1094342011410088, 2012. a
Lauritzen, P. H., Bacmeister, J. T., Callaghan, P. F., and Taylor, M. A.: NCAR_Topo (v1.0): NCAR global model topography generation software for unstructured grids, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 3975–3986, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3975-2015, 2015. a
Lauritzen, P. H., Nair, R. D., Herrington, A. R., Callaghan, P., Goldhaber, S.,
Dennis, J. M., Bacmeister, J. T., Eaton, B. E., Zarzycki, C. M., Taylor,
M. A., Ullrich, P. A., Dubos, T., Gettelman, A., Neale, R. B., Dobbins, B.,
Reed, K. A., Hannay, C., Medeiros, B., Benedict, J. J., and Tribbia, J. J.:
NCAR Release of CAM-SE in CESM2.0: A Reformulation of the Spectral Element
Dynamical Core in Dry-Mass Vertical Coordinates With Comprehensive Treatment
of Condensates and Energy, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy.,
10, 1537–1570, https://doi.org/10.1029/2017MS001257, 2018. a
Lawrence, D. M., Slater, A. G., Romanovsky, V. E., and Nicolsky, D. J.:
Sensitivity of a model projection of near-surface permafrost degradation to
soil column depth and representation of soil organic matter, J. Geophys. Res., 113, F02011, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JF000883, 2008. a
Lawrence, D. M., Oleson, K. W., Flanner, M. G., Thornton, P. E., Swenson,
S. C., Lawrence, P. J., Zeng, X., Yang, Z.-L., Levis, S., Sakaguchi, K.,
Bonan, G. B., and Slater, A. G.: Parameterization improvements and
functional and structural advances in Version 4 of the Community Land Model,
J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 3, 1–27,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011MS000045, 2011. a, b
Lawrence, D. M., Slater, A. G., and Swenson, S. C.: Simulation of Present-Day
and Future Permafrost and Seasonally Frozen Ground Conditions in CCSM4,
J. Climate, 25, 2207–2225, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00334.1, 2012. a
Lee, S. and Kim, H.-K.: The dynamical relationship between subtropical and
eddy-driven jets, J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 1490–1503, 2003. a
Leung, L. R. and Qian, Y.: Atmospheric rivers induced heavy precipitation and
flooding in the western U.S. simulated by the WRF regional climate model,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036445, 2009. a
Leung, L. R., Ringler, T. D., Collins, W. D., Taylor, M. A., Ashfaq, M., and
Framework, A. H. E.: A hierarchical evaluation of regional climate
simulations, EOS, 94, 297–298, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013EO340001, 2013. a
Liang, Y., Yang, B., Wang, M., Tang, J., Sakaguchi, K., Leung, L. R., and Xu,
X.: Multiscale Simulation of Precipitation Over East Asia by Variable
Resolution CAM-MPAS, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 13,
1–18, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002656, 2021. a
Lindvall, J., Svensson, G., and Hannay, C.: Evaluation of Near-Surface
Parameters in the Two Versions of the Atmospheric Model in CESM1 using Flux
Station Observations, J. Climate, 26, 26–44,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00020.1, 2013. a
Liu, X., Easter, R. C., Ghan, S. J., Zaveri, R., Rasch, P., Shi, X., Lamarque, J.-F., Gettelman, A., Morrison, H., Vitt, F., Conley, A., Park, S., Neale, R., Hannay, C., Ekman, A. M. L., Hess, P., Mahowald, N., Collins, W., Iacono, M. J., Bretherton, C. S., Flanner, M. G., and Mitchell, D.: Toward a minimal representation of aerosols in climate models: description and evaluation in the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 709–739, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-709-2012, 2012. a
Liu, X., Ma, P.-L., Wang, H., Tilmes, S., Singh, B., Easter, R. C., Ghan, S. J., and Rasch, P. J.: Description and evaluation of a new four-mode version of the Modal Aerosol Module (MAM4) within version 5.3 of the Community Atmosphere Model, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 505–522, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-505-2016, 2016. a
Loeb, N. G., Wielicki, B. A., Doelling, D. R., Smith, G. L., Keyes, D. F.,
Kato, S., Manalo-Smith, N., and Wong, T.: Toward optimal closure of the
Earth's top-of-atmosphere radiation budget, J. Climate, 22,
748–766, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2637.1, 2009. a
Loft, R.: Earth System Modeling Must Become More Energy Efficient, Eos (Washington. DC)., 101, 18–22, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020eo147051, 2020. a
Marchand, R., Mace, G. G., Ackerman, T., and Stephens, G.: Hydrometeor
detection using Cloudsat – An earth-orbiting 94-GHz cloud radar, J.
Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 25, 519–533,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JTECHA1006.1, 2008. a
McGinnis, S. and Mearns, L.: Building a climate service for North America
based on the NA-CORDEX data archive, Climate Services, 22, 100233,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2021.100233, 2021. a
McGregor, J. L.: Recent developments in variable-resolution global climate
modelling, Climatic Change, 129, 369–380, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0866-5,
2013. a
McIlhattan, E. A., L'Ecuyer, T. S., and Miller, N. B.: Observational evidence
linking arctic supercooled liquid cloud biases in CESM to snowfall
processes, J. Climate, 30, 4477–4495,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0666.1, 2017. a
Mearns, L. O., McGinnis, S., Korytina, D., Scinocca, J. F., Kharin, S., Jiao,
Y., Qian, M., Lazare, M., Winger, K., Christensen, O. B., Nikulin, G.,
Arritt, R. W., Herzmann, D., Bukovsky, M. S., Chang, H.-I., Castro, C.,
Frigon, A., and Gutowski, W. J. J.: The NA-CORDEX dataset, version 1.0.,
https://doi.org/10.5065/D6SJ1JCH, 2017. a, b, c, d, e
Meehl, G. A., Washington, W. M., Arblaster, J. M., Hu, A., Teng, H., Tebaldi,
C., Sanderson, B. N., Lamarque, J.-F., Conley, A., Strand, W. G., and White,
J. B.: Climate System Response to External Forcings and Climate Change
Projections in CCSM4, J. Climate, 25, 3661–3683,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00240.1, 2012. a
Meehl, G. a., Washington, W. M., Arblaster, J. M., Hu, A., Teng, H., Kay,
J. E., Gettelman, A., Lawrence, D. M., Sanderson, B. M., and Strand, W. G.:
Climate change projections in CESM1(CAM5) compared to CCSM4, J. Climate, 26, 6287–6308, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00572.1, 2013. a
Mishra, S. K. and Srinivasan, J.: Sensitivity of the simulated precipitation to changes in convective relaxation time scale, Ann. Geophys., 28, 1827–1846, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-28-1827-2010, 2010. a
Morcrette, C. J., Van Weverberg, K., Ma, H. Y., Ahlgrimm, M., Bazile, E.,
Berg, L. K., Cheng, A., Cheruy, F., Cole, J., Forbes, R., Gustafson, W. I.,
Huang, M., Lee, W. S., Liu, Y., Mellul, L., Merryfield, W. J., Qian, Y.,
Roehrig, R., Wang, Y. C., Xie, S., Xu, K. M., Zhang, C., Klein, S., and
Petch, J.: Introduction to CAUSES: Description of Weather and Climate Models
and Their Near-Surface Temperature Errors in 5 day Hindcasts Near the
Southern Great Plains, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123,
2655–2683, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027199, 2018. a
NCAR Research Computing: Derecho supercomputer,
https://arc.ucar.edu/knowledge_base/74317833 (last access: 20 May 2023), 2022. a
Neale, R. B., Richter, J. H., and Jochum, M.: The impact of convection on
ENSO: From a delayed oscillator to a series of events, J. Climate,
21, 5904–5924, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2244.1, 2008. a
Neale, R. B., Chen, C.-c., Gettelman, A., Lauritzen, P. H., Park, S.,
Williamson, D. L., Conley, A. J., Garcia, R. R., Kinnison, D. E., Lamarque,
J.-F., Marsh, D. R., Smith, A. K., Mills, M., Tilmes, S., Vitt, F., Morrison,
H., Cameron-Smith, P., Collins, W. D., Iacono, M. J., Easter, R. C., Ghan,
S. J., Liu, X., Rasch, P. J., and Taylor, M. A.: Description of the NCAR
Community Atmosphere Model (CAM 5.0). NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-486+STR, Tech.
rep., NCAR, Boulder, Colo., https://doi.org/10.5065/wgtk-4g06, 2010. a
NERSC: NERSC Strategic Plan for FY2014–2023, Tech. rep., NERSC, https://www.nersc.gov/news-publications/publications-reports/nersc-strategic-plan-fy2014-2023/ (last access: 23 May 2023), 2014. a
NERSC: NERSC Technical Documentation,
https://docs.nersc.gov/ (last access: 20 May 2023), 2018. a
NERSC: NERSC History of Systems,
https://www.nersc.gov/about/nersc-history/history-of-systems/ (last access: 20 May 2023),
2021. a
NERSC: Perlmutter Architecture,
https://docs.nersc.gov/systems/perlmutter/architecture/ (last access: 20 May 2023),
2022. a
Oleson, K. W., Lawrence, D. M., Gordon, B., Flanner, M. G., Kluzek, E., Peter,
J., Levis, S., Swenson, S. C., Thornton, E., Dai, A., Decker, M., Dickinson,
R., Feddema, J., Heald, C. L., Lamarque, J.-f., Niu, G.-y., Qian, T.,
Running, S., Sakaguchi, K., Slater, A., Stöckli, R., Wang, A., Yang,
L., Zeng, X., and Zeng, X.: Technical Description of version 4.0 of the
Community Land Model (CLM), in: NCAR Tech. Note, TN-478+STR, p. 257, Natl.
Cent. for Atmos. Res., Boulder, Colo., https://doi.org/10.5065/D6FB50WZ, 2010. a, b
Onogi, K., Tsutsui, J., Koide, H., Sakamoto, M., Kobayashi, S., Hatsushika, H.,
Matsumoto, T., Yamazaki, N., Kamahori, H., Takahashi, K., Kadokura, S., Wada,
K., Kato, K., Oyama, R., Ose, T., Mannoji, N., and Taira, R.: The JRA-25
Reanalysis, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 85, 369–432,
https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.85.369, 2007. a
Park, S. and Bretherton, C. S.: The University of Washington Shallow
Convection and Moist Turbulence Schemes and Their Impact on Climate
Simulations with the Community Atmosphere Model, J. Climate, 22,
3449–3469, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2557.1, 2009. a
Park, S., Bretherton, C. S., and Rasch, P. J.: Integrating cloud processes in
the Community Atmosphere Model, Version 5, J. Climate, 27,
6821–6856, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00087.1, 2014. a
Park, S.-H. H., Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J. B., Fowler, L. D., and Duda, M. G.:
Evaluation of global atmospheric solvers using extensions of the Jablonowski
and Williamson baroclinic wave test case, Mon. Weather Rev., 141,
3116–3129, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-12-00096.1, 2013. a, b
Pendergrass, A. G., Gleckler, P. J., Leung, L. R., and Jakob, C.: Benchmarking
Simulated Precipitation in Earth System Models, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 101, E814–E816, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0318.1,
2020. a
Pope, V. D. and Stratton, R. A.: The processes governing horizontal resolution
sensitivity in a climate model, Clim. Dynam., 19, 211–236,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-001-0222-8, 2002. a, b
Prein, A. F., Liu, C., Ikeda, K., Trier, S. B., Rasmussen, R. M., Holland,
G. J., and Clark, M. P.: Increased rainfall volume from future convective
storms in the US, Nat. Clim. Change, 7, 880–884,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-017-0007-7, 2017. a
Prein, A. F., Ban, N., Ou, T., Tang, J., Sakaguchi, K., Collier, E.,
Jayanarayanan, S., Li, L., Sobolowski, S., Chen, X., Zhou, X., Lai, H. W.,
Sugimoto, S., Zou, L., ul Hasson, S., Ekstrom, M., Pothapakula, P. K.,
Ahrens, B., Stuart, R., Steen-Larsen, H. C., Leung, R., Belusic, D.,
Kukulies, J., Curio, J., and Chen, D.: Towards Ensemble-Based
Kilometer-Scale Climate Simulations over the Third Pole Region, Clim.
Dynam., https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06543-3, 2022. a
Pryor, S. C. and Schoof, J. T.: Differential credibility assessment for
statistical downscaling, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 59,
1333–1349, https://doi.org/10.1175/jamc-d-19-0296.1, 2020. a
Pryor, S. C., Barthelmie, R. J., Bukovsky, M. S., Leung, L. R., and Sakaguchi,
K.: Climate change impacts on wind power generation,
Nature Reviews Earth and Environment, 2, 627–643, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0101-7, 2020. a, b
Randel, D. L., Vonder Haar, T. H., Ringerud, M. A., Stephens, G. L.,
Greenwald, T. J., and Combs, C. L.: A New Global Water Vapor Dataset,
B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77, 1233–1246,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077<1233:ANGWVD>2.0.CO;2, 1996. a
Rauscher, S. A. and Ringler, T. D.: Impact of variable-resolution meshes on
midlatitude baroclinic eddies using CAM-MPAS-A, Mon. Weather Rev., 142,
4256–4268, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-13-00366.1, 2014. a
Rhoades, A. M., Huang, X., Ullrich, P. A., and Zarzycki, C. M.: Characterizing
Sierra Nevada snowpack using variable-resolution CESM, J. Appl.
Meteorol. Clim., 55, 173–196, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-15-0156.1,
2016. a
Rhoades, A. M., Jones, A. D., and Ullrich, P. A.: Assessing Mountains as
Natural Reservoirs With a Multimetric Framework, Earth's Future, 6,
1221–1241, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000789, 2018a. a
Rhoades, A. M., Ullrich, P. A., Zarzycki, C. M., Johansen, H., Margulis, S. A.,
Morrison, H., Xu, Z., and Collins, W. D.: Sensitivity of Mountain
Hydroclimate Simulations in Variable‐Resolution CESM to Microphysics and
Horizontal Resolution, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 10,
1357–1380, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001326, 2018b. a, b, c
Richter, J. H., Sassi, F., and Garcia, R. R.: Toward a Physically Based
Gravity Wave Source Parameterization in a General Circulation Model, J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 136–156, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAS3112.1, 2010. a
Ringler, T. D., Thuburn, J., Klemp, J., and Skamarock, W.: A unified approach
to energy conservation and potential vorticity dynamics for
arbitrarily-structured C-grids, J. Comput. Phys., 229,
3065–3090, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2009.12.007, 2010. a
Ringler, T. D., Petersen, M., Higdon, R. L., Jacobsen, D., Jones, P. W., and
Maltrud, M.: A multi-resolution approach to global ocean modeling, Ocean
Model., 69, 211–232, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2013.04.010, 2013. a
Roberts, M. J., Vidale, P. L., Senior, C., Hewitt, H. T., Bates, C., Berthou,
S., Chang, P., Christensen, H. M., Danilov, S., Demory, M. E., Griffies,
S. M., Haarsma, R., Jung, T., Martin, G., Minobe, S., Ringler, T., Satoh, M.,
Schiemann, R., Scoccimarro, E., Stephens, G., and Wehner, M. F.: The
benefits of global high resolution for climate simulation process
understanding and the enabling of stakeholder decisions at the regional
scale, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 99, 2341–2359,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00320.1, 2018. a
Rossow, W. B. and Schiffer, R. A.: Advances in Understanding Clouds from
ISCCP, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 80, 2261–2287,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1999)080<2261:AIUCFI>2.0.CO;2, 1999. a
Sacks, W. J., Dobbins, B., Fischer, C., Rosen, D., Kay, J. E., Edwards, J., Thayer-Calder, K., Oehmke,
R. C., and Turuncoglu, U. U.: The Community Earth System Model, Github [code], https://github.com/ESCOMP/CESM (last access: 18 May 2023), 2020. a
Sakaguchi, K.: Model input data for the FACETS downscaling simulation with the
CAM-MPAS model, Zenodo [data], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7490129, 2022. a
Sakaguchi, K.: Full dataset of the FACETS Dynamical Downscaling
Simulations over North America by the CAM-MPAS Variable-Resoluton Model, https://portal.nersc.gov/archive/home/k/ksa/www/FACETS/CAM-MPAS (last access: 18 May 2023), 2023. a
Sakaguchi, K. and Harrop, B.: kosaka90/cesm1.5-mpasv4: Code version used for
the FACETS downscaling data, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7262209, 2022. a
Sakaguchi, K., Leung, L. R., Zhao, C., Yang, Q., Lu, J., Hagos, S., Rauscher,
S. a., Dong, L., Ringler, T. D., and Lauritzen, P. H.: Exploring a
multiresolution approach using AMIP simulations, J. Climate, 28,
5549–5574, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00729.1, 2015. a, b, c, d
Sakaguchi, K., Lu, J., Leung, L. R., Zhao, C., Li, Y., and Hagos, S.: Sources
and pathways of the upscale effects on the Southern Hemisphere jet in
MPAS-CAM4 variable-Resolution simulations, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 8, 1786–1805, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016MS000743, 2016. a
Sakaguchi, K., McGinnis, S. A., Leung, L. R., Bukovsky, M. S., McCrary, R. R.,
and Mearns, L. O.: Differential Credibility Analysis of Dynamical
Downscaling Framework with a Focus on Precipitation Characteristics over
Southern Great Plains, AGU Fall Meeting 2021, New Orleans, LO, 13–17 December
2021, A55Q-1635, 2021. a, b
Sakaguchi, K., McGinnis, S. A., Leung, L. R., Gutowski, W. J., and Dong, L.:
FACETS Dynamical Downscaling Simulations over North America by the CAM-MPAS
Variable-Resolution Model, the Pacific NorthWest National Laboratory DataHub, https://doi.org/10.25584/PNNL.data/1895153,
2022. a
Shaw, T. A.: Mechanisms of Future Predicted Changes in the Zonal Mean
Mid-Latitude Circulation, Current Climate Change Reports, 5, 345–357,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-019-00145-8, 2019. a
Skamarock, W. C. and Gassmann, A.: Conservative transport schemes for
spherical geodesic grids: High-order flux operators for ODE-based time
integration, Mon. Weather Rev., 139, 2962–2975,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-10-05056.1, 2011. a
Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J. B., Duda, M. G., Fowler, L. D., Park, S.-H., and
Ringler, T. D.: A multiscale nonhydrostatic atmospheric model using
Centroidal Voronoi Tesselations and C-grid staggering, Mon. Weather Rev., 140, 3090–3105, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00215.1, 2012. a, b, c
Smid, M. and Costa, A. C.: Climate projections and downscaling techniques: a
discussion for impact studies in urban systems,
International Journal of Urban Sciences, 22, 277–307, https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2017.1409132, 2018. a
Smith, G., Barkstrom, B. R., and Harrison, E. F.: The earth radiation budget
experiment: Early validation results, Adv. Space Res., 7,
167–177, https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1177(87)90141-4, 1987. a
Song, F., Feng, Z., Ruby Leung, L., Houze, R. A., Wang, J., Hardin, J., and
Homeyer, C. R.: Contrasting spring and summer large-scale environments
associated with mesoscale convective systems over the U.S. Great Plains,
J. Climate, 32, 6749–6767, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0839.1, 2019. a
Song, F., Feng, Z., Leung, L. R., Pokharel, B., Wang, S. Y., Chen, X.,
Sakaguchi, K., and chia Wang, C.: Crucial Roles of Eastward Propagating
Environments in the Summer MCS Initiation Over the U.S. Great Plains,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2021JD034991,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD034991, 2021. a
Staniforth, A. and Thuburn, J.: Horizontal grids for global weather and
climate prediction models: a review, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 138, 1–26, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.958, 2011. a
Susskind, J., Barnet, C. D., and Blaisdell, J. M.: Retrieval of atmospheric
and surface parameters from AIRS/AMSU/HSB data in the presence of clouds,
IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 41, 390–409,
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2002.808236, 2003. a
Tange, O.: GNU Parallel 2018, Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5523272, 2018. a
The MPAS project: MPAS home page,
http://mpas-dev.github.io/ (last access: 22 May 2023), 2013. a
Trenberth, K. E.: Truncation and use of model-coordinate data, Tellus, 47A,
287–303, 1995. a
Trzaska, S. and Schnarr, E.: A review of downscaling methods for climate
change projections, United States Agency for International Development by
Tetra Tech ARD, 1–42, https://www.climatelinks.org/sites/default/files/asset/document/Downscaling_CLEARED.pdf (last access: 25 May 2023), 2014. a
UCAR/NCAR/CISL/TDD: The NCAR Command Language, National Center for Atmospheric Research Climate Data Gateway, https://doi.org/10.5065/D6WD3XH5,
2017a. a
UCAR/NCAR/CISL/TDD: NCL: Regridding using NCL with Earth System Modeling
Framework (ESMF) software,
https://www.ncl.ucar.edu/Applications/ESMF.shtml (last access: 22 May 2023),
2017b. a
Uppala, S. M., Kållberg, P. W., Simmons, A. J., Andrae, U., Bechtold, V.
D. C., Fiorino, M., Gibson, J. K., Haseler, J., Hernandez, A., Kelly, G. A.,
Li, X., Onogi, K., Saarinen, S., Sokka, N., Allan, R. P., Andersson, E.,
Arpe, K., Balmaseda, M. A., Beljaars, A. C. M., Berg, L. V. D., Bidlot, J.,
Bormann, N., Caires, S., Chevallier, F., Dethof, A., Dragosavac, M., Fisher,
M., Fuentes, M., Hagemann, S., Hólm, E., Hoskins, B. J., Isaksen, L.,
Janssen, P. A. E. M., Jenne, R., Mcnally, A. P., Mahfouf, J.-F., Morcrette,
J.-J., Rayner, N. A., Saunders, R. W., Simon, P., Sterl, A., Trenberth,
K. E., Untch, A., Vasiljevic, D., Viterbo, P., and Woollen, J.: The ERA-40
re-analysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131,
2961–3012, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.176, 2005. a
Wang, Y., Leung, L. R., McGregor, J. L., Lee, D.-K., Wang, W.-C., Ding, Y., and
Kimura, F.: Regional climate modeling: Progress, challenges, and prospects,
J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 82, 1599–1628,
https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.82.1599, 2004. a
Wang, Y., Hu, K., Huang, G., and Tao, W.: Asymmetric impacts of El Niño
and la Niña on the Pacific-North American teleconnection pattern: The
role of subtropical jet stream, Environ. Res. Lett., 16, 114040,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac31ed, 2021. a
Wehner, M. F., Reed, Kevin, A., Li, F., Prabhat, Bacmeister, J. T., Chen,
C.-T., Paciorek, C. J., Gleckler, P. J., Sperber, K. R., Collins, W. D.,
Gettelman, A., and Jablonowski, C.: The effect of horizontal resolution on
simulation quality in the Community Atmospheric Model, CAM5.1, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 6, 980–997,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2013MS000276, 2014. a
Wilby, R. L. and Dawson, C. W.: The statistical downscaling model: Insights
from one decade of application, Int. J. Climatol., 33,
1707–1719, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3544, 2013. a
Wilby, R. L., Hay, L. E., Gutowski, W. J., Arritt, R. W., Takle, E. S., Pan,
Z., Leavesley, G. H., and Clark, M. P.: Hydrological responses to
dynamically and statistically downscaled climate model output, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 1199–1202, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL006078, 2000. a
Williamson, D. L.: The evolution of dynamical cores for global atmospheric
models, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 85B, 241–269,
2007. a
Williamson, D. L.: Convergence of aqua-planet simulations with increasing
resolution in the Community Atmospheric Model, Version 3, Tellus A,
60, 848–862, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0870.2008.00339.x, 2008.
a, b
Williamson, D. L.: The effect of time steps and time-scales on
parameterization suites, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 139, 548–560, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.1992, 2013. a
Wills, R. C., White, R. H., and Levine, X. J.: Northern Hemisphere Stationary
Waves in a Changing Climate, Current Climate Change Reports, 5, 372–389,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-019-00147-6, 2019. a
Wood, A. W., Leung, L. R., Sridhar, V., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Hydrologic
implications of dynamical and statistical approaches to downscaling climate
model outputs, Climatic Change, 62, 189–216,
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CLIM.0000013685.99609.9e, 2004. a
Xie, S., Lin, W., Rasch, P. J., Ma, P. L., Neale, R., Larson, V. E., Qian, Y.,
Bogenschutz, P. A., Caldwell, P., Cameron-Smith, P., Golaz, J. C., Mahajan,
S., Singh, B., Tang, Q., Wang, H., Yoon, J. H., Zhang, K., and Zhang, Y.:
Understanding Cloud and Convective Characteristics in Version 1 of the E3SM
Atmosphere Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 10,
2618–2644, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001350, 2018. a
Xu, Z., Rhoades, A. M., Johansen, H., Ullrich, P. A., and Collins, W. D.: An
intercomparison of GCM and RCM dynamical downscaling for characterizing the
hydroclimatology of California and Nevada, J. Hydrometeorol., 19,
1485–1506, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-17-0181.1, 2018. a
Xu, Z., Di Vittorio, A., Zhang, J., Rhoades, A., Xin, X., Xu, H., and Xiao,
C.: Evaluating Variable-Resolution CESM Over China and Western United States
for Use in Water-Energy Nexus and Impacts Modeling, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2020JD034361, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD034361, 2021. a
Zarzycki, C. M.: VR-CESM-Toolkit,
https://github.com/zarzycki/vr-cesm-toolkit (last access: 22 May 2023), 2018. a
Zender, C. S.: netCDF Operators (NCO), Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.595745, 2017. a
Zhang, G. J. and McFarlane, N. A.: Sensitivity of climate simulations to the
parameterization of cumulus convection in the Canadian Climate Centre General
Circulation Model, Atmos. Ocean, 33, 407–446, 1995. a
Zhao, C., Leung, L. R., Park, S.-H., Hagos, S., Lu, J., Sakaguchi, K., Yoon,
J.-H., Harrop, B. E., Skamarock, W. C., and Duda, M. G.: Exploring the
impacts of physics and resolution on aqua-planet simulations from a
non-hydrostatic global variable-resolution modeling framework, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 8, 1751–1768, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016MS000727, 2016. a, b, c
Short summary
We document details of the regional climate downscaling dataset produced by a global variable-resolution model. The experiment is unique in that it follows a standard protocol designed for coordinated experiments of regional models. We found negligible influence of post-processing on statistical analysis, importance of simulation quality outside of the target region, and computational challenges that our model code faced due to rapidly changing super computer systems.
We document details of the regional climate downscaling dataset produced by a global...
