Articles | Volume 16, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3029-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3029-2023
Model evaluation paper
 | 
01 Jun 2023
Model evaluation paper |  | 01 Jun 2023

Technical descriptions of the experimental dynamical downscaling simulations over North America by the CAM–MPAS variable-resolution model

Koichi Sakaguchi, L. Ruby Leung, Colin M. Zarzycki, Jihyeon Jang, Seth McGinnis, Bryce E. Harrop, William C. Skamarock, Andrew Gettelman, Chun Zhao, William J. Gutowski, Stephen Leak, and Linda Mearns

Related authors

Quantifying the impact of sub-grid surface wind variability on sea salt and dust emissions in CAM5
Kai Zhang, Chun Zhao, Hui Wan, Yun Qian, Richard C. Easter, Steven J. Ghan, Koichi Sakaguchi, and Xiaohong Liu
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 607–632, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-607-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-607-2016, 2016
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Bergen metrics: composite error metrics for assessing performance of climate models using EURO-CORDEX simulations
Alok K. Samantaray, Priscilla A. Mooney, and Carla A. Vivacqua
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3321–3339, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3321-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3321-2024, 2024
Short summary
A dynamic approach to three-dimensional radiative transfer in subkilometer-scale numerical weather prediction models: the dynamic TenStream solver v1.0
Richard Maier, Fabian Jakub, Claudia Emde, Mihail Manev, Aiko Voigt, and Bernhard Mayer
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3357–3383, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3357-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3357-2024, 2024
Short summary
Evaluation and development of surface layer scheme representation of temperature inversions over boreal forests in Arctic wintertime conditions
Julia Maillard, Jean-Christophe Raut, and François Ravetta
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3303–3320, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3303-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3303-2024, 2024
Short summary
Modelling wind farm effects in HARMONIE–AROME (cycle 43.2.2) – Part 1: Implementation and evaluation
Jana Fischereit, Henrik Vedel, Xiaoli Guo Larsén, Natalie E. Theeuwes, Gregor Giebel, and Eigil Kaas
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2855–2875, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2855-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2855-2024, 2024
Short summary
Analytical and adaptable initial conditions for dry and moist baroclinic waves in the global hydrostatic model OpenIFS (CY43R3)
Clément Bouvier, Daan van den Broek, Madeleine Ekblom, and Victoria A. Sinclair
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2961–2986, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2961-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2961-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Adler, R. F., Huffman, G. J., Chang, A., Ferrado, R., Xie, P.-P., Janowiak, J., Rudolf, B., Schneider, U., Curtis, S., Bolvin, D. T., Gruber, A., Susskind, J., Arkin, P., and Nelkin, E.: The Version-2 Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) monthly precipitation analysis (1979 – Present), J. Hydrometeorol., 4, 1147–1167, 2003. a
Allen, T., Daley, C. S., Doerfler, D., Austin, B., and Wright, N. J.: Performance and energy usage of workloads on KNL and haswell architectures, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10724 LNCS, 236–249, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72971-8_12, 2018. a
Atmospheric Model Working Group: Atmospheric Model Working Group (AMWG) diagnostics package, Subversion Repository [code], https://www2.cesm.ucar.edu/working_groups/Atmosphere/amwg-diagnostics-package/index.html (last access: 18 May 2023), 2014. a, b
Atmosphere Model Working Group: CAM5.4: Final configuration AMWG diagnostic package, https://webext.cgd.ucar.edu/FAMIP/f.e13.FAMIPC5.f09_f09_beta17_cam5.4_alpha03.002/atm/f.e13.FAMIPC5.f09_f09_beta17_cam5.4_alpha03.002-obs/ (last access: 13 May 2023), 2015. a, b, c
Bacmeister, J. T., Wehner, M. F., Neale, R. B., Gettelman, A., Hannay, C., Lauritzen, P. H., Caron, J. M., and Truesdale, J. E.: Exploratory high-resolution climate simulations using the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM), J. Climate, 27, 3073–3099, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00387.1, 2014. a, b, c
Download
Short summary
We document details of the regional climate downscaling dataset produced by a global variable-resolution model. The experiment is unique in that it follows a standard protocol designed for coordinated experiments of regional models. We found negligible influence of post-processing on statistical analysis, importance of simulation quality outside of the target region, and computational challenges that our model code faced due to rapidly changing super computer systems.