Articles | Volume 16, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1315-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1315-2023
Model evaluation paper
 | 
24 Feb 2023
Model evaluation paper |  | 24 Feb 2023

Modeling large‐scale landform evolution with a stream power law for glacial erosion (OpenLEM v37): benchmarking experiments against a more process-based description of ice flow (iSOSIA v3.4.3)

Moritz Liebl, Jörg Robl, Stefan Hergarten, David Lundbek Egholm, and Kurt Stüwe

Related authors

Old orogen – young topography: lithological contrasts controlling erosion and relief formation in the Bohemian Massif
Jörg Christian Robl, Fabian Dremel, Kurt Stüwe, Stefan Hergarten, Christoph von Hagke, and Derek Fabel
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3256,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3256, 2024
Short summary
A simple model for faceted topographies at normal faults based on an extended stream-power law
Stefan Hergarten
Earth Surf. Dynam., 12, 1315–1327, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-12-1315-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-12-1315-2024, 2024
Short summary
Modeling the formation of toma hills based on fluid dynamics with a modified Voellmy rheology
Stefan Hergarten
Earth Surf. Dynam., 12, 1193–1203, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-12-1193-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-12-1193-2024, 2024
Short summary
MinVoellmy v1: a lightweight model for simulating rapid mass movements based on a modified Voellmy rheology
Stefan Hergarten
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 781–794, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-781-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-781-2024, 2024
Short summary
Scaling between volume and runout of rock avalanches explained by a modified Voellmy rheology
Stefan Hergarten
Earth Surf. Dynam., 12, 219–229, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-12-219-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-12-219-2024, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Numerical methods
Hydro-geomorphological modelling of leaky wooden dam efficacy from reach to catchment scale with CAESAR-Lisflood 1.9j
Joshua M. Wolstenholme, Christopher J. Skinner, David Milan, Robert E. Thomas, and Daniel R. Parsons
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1395–1411, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1395-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1395-2025, 2025
Short summary
Enhancing single precision with quasi-double precision: achieving double-precision accuracy in the Model for Prediction Across Scales – Atmosphere (MPAS-A) version 8.2.1
Jiayi Lai, Lanning Wang, Qizhong Wu, Yizhou Yang, and Fang Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1089–1102, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1089-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1089-2025, 2025
Short summary
Advances in land surface forecasting: a comparison of LSTM, gradient boosting, and feed-forward neural networks as prognostic state emulators in a case study with ecLand
Marieke Wesselkamp, Matthew Chantry, Ewan Pinnington, Margarita Choulga, Souhail Boussetta, Maria Kalweit, Joschka Bödecker, Carsten F. Dormann, Florian Pappenberger, and Gianpaolo Balsamo
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 921–937, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-921-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-921-2025, 2025
Short summary
Subgrid corrections for the linear inertial equations of a compound flood model – a case study using SFINCS 2.1.1 Dollerup release
Maarten van Ormondt, Tim Leijnse, Roel de Goede, Kees Nederhoff, and Ap van Dongeren
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 843–861, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-843-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-843-2025, 2025
Short summary
Introducing Iterative Model Calibration (IMC) v1.0: a generalizable framework for numerical model calibration with a CAESAR-Lisflood case study
Chayan Banerjee, Kien Nguyen, Clinton Fookes, Gregory Hancock, and Thomas Coulthard
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 803–818, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-803-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-803-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Alley, R. B., Cuffey, K. M., and Zoet, L. K.: Glacial erosion: status and outlook, Ann. Glaciol., 60, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2019.38, 2019. a, b
Anderson, R. S., Molnar, P., and Kessler, M. A.: Features of glacial valley profiles simply explained, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 111, F01004, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jf000344, 2006. a
Bahr, D. B.: Width and length scaling of glaciers, J. Glaciol., 43, 557–562, https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000035164, 1997. a
Bernard, M., Steer, P., Gallagher, K., and Egholm, D. L.: The Impact of Lithology on Fjord Morphology, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL093101, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093101, 2021. a, b, c
Brædstrup, C. F., Egholm, D. L., Ugelvig, S. V., and Pedersen, V. K.: Basal shear stress under alpine glaciers: insights from experiments using the iSOSIA and Elmer/Ice models, Earth Surf. Dynam., 4, 159–174, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-4-159-2016, 2016. a, b, c, d, e, f, g
Download
Short summary
In this study, we benchmark a topography-based model for glacier erosion (OpenLEM) with a well-established process-based model (iSOSIA). Our experiments show that large-scale erosion patterns and particularly the transformation of valley length geometry from fluvial to glacial conditions are very similar in both models. This finding enables the application of OpenLEM to study the influence of climate and tectonics on glaciated mountains with reasonable computational effort on standard PCs.
Share