Articles | Volume 15, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3447-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3447-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Review and perspective paper
| 
04 May 2022
Review and perspective paper |
| 04 May 2022
| 04 May 2022
Empirical values and assumptions in the convection schemes of numerical models
Anahí Villalba-Pradas
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Earth and Space Sciences (ess) Research
Group, Department of Environmental Sciences, Institute of Environmental
Sciences, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Avda. Carlos III s/n, Toledo 45071, Spain
Francisco J. Tapiador
Earth and Space Sciences (ess) Research
Group, Department of Environmental Sciences, Institute of Environmental
Sciences, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Avda. Carlos III s/n, Toledo 45071, Spain
Related authors
Peter Huszar, Alvaro Patricio Prieto Perez, Lukáš Bartík, Jan Karlický, and Anahi Villalba-Pradas
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 397–425, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-397-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-397-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Urbanization transforms rural land into artificial land, while due to human activities, it also introduces a great quantity of emissions. We quantify the impact of urbanization on the final particulate matter pollutant levels by looking not only at these emissions, but also at the way urban land cover influences meteorological conditions, how the removal of pollutants changes due to urban land cover, and how biogenic emissions from vegetation change due to less vegetation in urban areas.
Peter Huszar, Alvaro Patricio Prieto Perez, Lukáš Bartík, Jan Karlický, and Anahi Villalba-Pradas
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 397–425, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-397-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-397-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Urbanization transforms rural land into artificial land, while due to human activities, it also introduces a great quantity of emissions. We quantify the impact of urbanization on the final particulate matter pollutant levels by looking not only at these emissions, but also at the way urban land cover influences meteorological conditions, how the removal of pollutants changes due to urban land cover, and how biogenic emissions from vegetation change due to less vegetation in urban areas.
Kwonil Kim, Wonbae Bang, Eun-Chul Chang, Francisco J. Tapiador, Chia-Lun Tsai, Eunsil Jung, and Gyuwon Lee
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 11955–11978, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11955-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11955-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study analyzes the microphysical characteristics of snow in complex terrain and the nearby ocean according to topography and wind pattern during the ICE-POP 2018 campaign. The observations from collocated vertically pointing radars and disdrometers indicate that the riming in the mountainous region is likely caused by a strong shear and turbulence. The different behaviors of aggregation and riming were found by three different synoptic patterns (air–sea interaction, cold low, and warm low).
Andrés Navarro, Raúl Moreno, and Francisco J. Tapiador
Earth Syst. Dynam., 9, 1045–1062, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-1045-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-1045-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Earth system models provide simplified accounts of human–Earth interactions. Most current models treat CO2 emissions as a homogeneously distributed forcing. However, this paper presents a new parameterization, POPEM (POpulation Parameterization for Earth Models), that computes anthropogenic CO2 emissions at a grid point scale. A major advantage of this approach is the increased capacity to understand the potential effects of localized pollutant emissions on long-term global climate statistics.
R. Checa-Garcia, A. Tokay, and F. J. Tapiador
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amtd-7-2339-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/amtd-7-2339-2014, 2014
Preprint withdrawn
Related subject area
Climate and Earth system modeling
High-resolution downscaling of CMIP6 Earth system and global climate models using deep learning for Iberia
Global Downscaled Projections for Climate Impacts Research (GDPCIR): preserving quantile trends for modeling future climate impacts
Understanding changes in cloud simulations from E3SM version 1 to version 2
WRF (v4.0)–SUEWS (v2018c) coupled system: development, evaluation and application
Scenario setup and forcing data for impact model evaluation and impact attribution within the third round of the Inter-Sectoral Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP3a)
Deep learning model based on multi-scale feature fusion for precipitation nowcasting
The Framework for Assessing Changes To Sea-level (FACTS) v1.0: a platform for characterizing parametric and structural uncertainty in future global, relative, and extreme sea-level change
Getting the leaves right matters for estimating temperature extremes
The Southern Ocean Freshwater Input from Antarctica (SOFIA) Initiative: scientific objectives and experimental design
Modeling and evaluating the effects of irrigation on land–atmosphere interaction in southwestern Europe with the regional climate model REMO2020–iMOVE using a newly developed parameterization
Process-oriented models of autumn leaf phenology: ways to sound calibration and implications of uncertain projections
An evaluation of the LLC4320 global-ocean simulation based on the submesoscale structure of modeled sea surface temperature fields
An emulation-based approach for interrogating reactive transport models
A sub-grid parameterization scheme for topographic vertical motion in CAM5-SE
Technology to aid the analysis of large-volume multi-institute climate model output at a central analysis facility (PRIMAVERA Data Management Tool V2.10)
A diffusion-based kernel density estimator (diffKDE, version 1) with optimal bandwidth approximation for the analysis of data in geoscience and ecological research
Monte Carlo drift correction – quantifying the drift uncertainty of global climate models
Improvements in the Canadian Earth System Model (CanESM) through systematic model analysis: CanESM5.0 and CanESM5.1
Earth System Model Aerosol–Cloud Diagnostics (ESMAC Diags) package, version 2: assessing aerosols, clouds, and aerosol–cloud interactions via field campaign and long-term observations
CIOFC1.0: a common parallel input/output framework based on C-Coupler2.0
Overcoming computational challenges to realize meter- to submeter-scale resolution in cloud simulations using the super-droplet method
Introducing a new floodplain scheme in ORCHIDEE (version 7885): validation and evaluation over the Pantanal wetlands
URock 2023a: an open-source GIS-based wind model for complex urban settings
DASH: a MATLAB toolbox for paleoclimate data assimilation
Accurate Assessment of Land-Atmosphere Coupling in Climate Models Requires High Frequency Data Output
Comparing the Performance of Julia on CPUs versus GPUs and Julia-MPI versus Fortran-MPI: a case study with MPAS-Ocean (Version 7.1)
All aboard! Earth system investigations with the CH2O-CHOO TRAIN v1.0
The Canadian Atmospheric Model version 5 (CanAM5.0.3)
The Teddy tool v1.1: temporal disaggregation of daily climate model data for climate impact analysis
Assimilation of the AMSU-A radiances using the CESM (v2.1.0) and the DART (v9.11.13)–RTTOV (v12.3)
Modernizing the open-source community Noah with multi-parameterization options (Noah-MP) land surface model (version 5.0) with enhanced modularity, interoperability, and applicability
Simulated stable water isotopes during the mid-Holocene and pre-industrial periods using AWI-ESM-2.1-wiso
Performance and process-based evaluation of the BARPA-R Australasian regional climate model version 1
Assessing the Sensitivity of Aerosol Mass Budget and Effective Radiative Forcing to Horizontal Grid Spacing in E3SMv1 Using A Regional Refinement Approach
Truly Conserving with Conservative Remapping Methods
Rainbows and climate change: a tutorial on climate model diagnostics and parameterization
Exchange-grid coupling approach for the IOW Earth System Model (version 1.04.00) of the Baltic Sea region
Disentangling the Hydrological and Hydraulic Controls on Streamflow Variability in E3SM V2 – A Case Study in the Pantanal Region
ModE-Sim – a medium-sized atmospheric general circulation model (AGCM) ensemble to study climate variability during the modern era (1420 to 2009)
MESMAR v1: a new regional coupled climate model for downscaling, predictability, and data assimilation studies in the Mediterranean region
Climate model Selection by Independence, Performance, and Spread (ClimSIPS v1.0.1) for regional applications
ibicus: a new open-source Python package and comprehensive interface for statistical bias adjustment and evaluation in climate modelling (v1.0.1)
Carbon isotopes in the marine biogeochemistry model FESOM2.1-REcoM3
IceTFT v1.0.0: interpretable long-term prediction of Arctic sea ice extent with deep learning
Earth system modeling on Modular Supercomputing Architectures: coupled atmosphere-ocean simulations with ICON 2.6.6-rc
The KNMI Large Ensemble Time Slice (KNMI–LENTIS)
ENSO statistics, teleconnections, and atmosphere–ocean coupling in the Taiwan Earth System Model version 1
Using probabilistic machine learning to better model temporal patterns in parameterizations: a case study with the Lorenz 96 model
Benchmarking GOCART-2G in the Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS)
Using EUREC4A/ATOMIC Field Campaign Data to Improve Trade-Wind Regimes in the Community Atmosphere Model
Pedro M. M. Soares, Frederico Johannsen, Daniela C. A. Lima, Gil Lemos, Virgílio A. Bento, and Angelina Bushenkova
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 229–259, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-229-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-229-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study uses deep learning (DL) to downscale global climate models for the Iberian Peninsula. Four DL architectures were evaluated and trained using historical climate data and then used to downscale future projections from the global models. These show agreement with the original models and reveal a warming of 2 ºC to 6 ºC, along with decreasing precipitation in western Iberia after 2040. This approach offers key regional climate change information for adaptation strategies in the region.
Diana R. Gergel, Steven B. Malevich, Kelly E. McCusker, Emile Tenezakis, Michael T. Delgado, Meredith A. Fish, and Robert E. Kopp
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 191–227, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-191-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-191-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The freely available Global Downscaled Projections for Climate Impacts Research (GDPCIR) dataset gives researchers a new tool for studying how future climate will evolve at a local or regional level, corresponding to the latest global climate model simulations prepared as part of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s Sixth Assessment Report. Those simulations represent an enormous advance in quality, detail, and scope that GDPCIR translates to the local level.
Yuying Zhang, Shaocheng Xie, Yi Qin, Wuyin Lin, Jean-Christophe Golaz, Xue Zheng, Po-Lun Ma, Yun Qian, Qi Tang, Christopher R. Terai, and Meng Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 169–189, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-169-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-169-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We performed systematic evaluation of clouds simulated in the Energy
Exascale Earth System Model (E3SMv2) to document model performance and understand what updates in E3SMv2 have caused changes in clouds from E3SMv1 to E3SMv2. We find that stratocumulus clouds along the subtropical west coast of continents are dramatically improved, primarily due to the retuning done in CLUBB. This study offers additional insights into clouds simulated in E3SMv2 and will benefit future E3SM developments.
Exascale Earth System Model (E3SMv2) to document model performance and understand what updates in E3SMv2 have caused changes in clouds from E3SMv1 to E3SMv2. We find that stratocumulus clouds along the subtropical west coast of continents are dramatically improved, primarily due to the retuning done in CLUBB. This study offers additional insights into clouds simulated in E3SMv2 and will benefit future E3SM developments.
Ting Sun, Hamidreza Omidvar, Zhenkun Li, Ning Zhang, Wenjuan Huang, Simone Kotthaus, Helen C. Ward, Zhiwen Luo, and Sue Grimmond
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 91–116, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-91-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-91-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
For the first time, we coupled a state-of-the-art urban land surface model – Surface Urban Energy and Water Scheme (SUEWS) – with the widely-used Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, creating an open-source tool that may benefit multiple applications. We tested our new system at two UK sites and demonstrated its potential by examining how human activities in various areas of Greater London influence local weather conditions.
Katja Frieler, Jan Volkholz, Stefan Lange, Jacob Schewe, Matthias Mengel, María del Rocío Rivas López, Christian Otto, Christopher P. O. Reyer, Dirk Nikolaus Karger, Johanna T. Malle, Simon Treu, Christoph Menz, Julia L. Blanchard, Cheryl S. Harrison, Colleen M. Petrik, Tyler D. Eddy, Kelly Ortega-Cisneros, Camilla Novaglio, Yannick Rousseau, Reg A. Watson, Charles Stock, Xiao Liu, Ryan Heneghan, Derek Tittensor, Olivier Maury, Matthias Büchner, Thomas Vogt, Tingting Wang, Fubao Sun, Inga J. Sauer, Johannes Koch, Inne Vanderkelen, Jonas Jägermeyr, Christoph Müller, Sam Rabin, Jochen Klar, Iliusi D. Vega del Valle, Gitta Lasslop, Sarah Chadburn, Eleanor Burke, Angela Gallego-Sala, Noah Smith, Jinfeng Chang, Stijn Hantson, Chantelle Burton, Anne Gädeke, Fang Li, Simon N. Gosling, Hannes Müller Schmied, Fred Hattermann, Jida Wang, Fangfang Yao, Thomas Hickler, Rafael Marcé, Don Pierson, Wim Thiery, Daniel Mercado-Bettín, Robert Ladwig, Ana Isabel Ayala-Zamora, Matthew Forrest, and Michel Bechtold
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1–51, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Our paper provides an overview of all observational climate-related and socioeconomic forcing data used as input for the impact model evaluation and impact attribution experiments within the third round of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project. The experiments are designed to test our understanding of observed changes in natural and human systems and to quantify to what degree these changes have already been induced by climate change.
Jinkai Tan, Qiqiao Huang, and Sheng Chen
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 53–69, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-53-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-53-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents a deep learning architecture, multi-scale feature fusion (MFF), to improve the forecast skills of precipitations especially for heavy precipitations. MFF uses multi-scale receptive fields so that the movement features of precipitation systems are well captured. MFF uses the mechanism of discrete probability to reduce uncertainties and forecast errors so that heavy precipitations are produced.
Robert E. Kopp, Gregory G. Garner, Tim H. J. Hermans, Shantenu Jha, Praveen Kumar, Alexander Reedy, Aimée B. A. Slangen, Matteo Turilli, Tamsin L. Edwards, Jonathan M. Gregory, George Koubbe, Anders Levermann, Andre Merzky, Sophie Nowicki, Matthew D. Palmer, and Chris Smith
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 7461–7489, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7461-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7461-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Future sea-level rise projections exhibit multiple forms of uncertainty, all of which must be considered by scientific assessments intended to inform decision-making. The Framework for Assessing Changes To Sea-level (FACTS) is a new software package intended to support assessments of global mean, regional, and extreme sea-level rise. An early version of FACTS supported the development of the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report sea-level projections.
Gregory Duveiller, Mark Pickering, Joaquin Muñoz-Sabater, Luca Caporaso, Souhail Boussetta, Gianpaolo Balsamo, and Alessandro Cescatti
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 7357–7373, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7357-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7357-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Some of our best tools to describe the state of the land system, including the intensity of heat waves, have a problem. The model currently assumes that the number of leaves in ecosystems always follows the same cycle. By using satellite observations of when leaves are present, we show that capturing the yearly changes in this cycle is important to avoid errors in estimating surface temperature. We show that this has strong implications for our capacity to describe heat waves across Europe.
Neil C. Swart, Torge Martin, Rebecca Beadling, Jia-Jia Chen, Christopher Danek, Matthew H. England, Riccardo Farneti, Stephen M. Griffies, Tore Hattermann, Judith Hauck, F. Alexander Haumann, André Jüling, Qian Li, John Marshall, Morven Muilwijk, Andrew G. Pauling, Ariaan Purich, Inga J. Smith, and Max Thomas
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 7289–7309, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7289-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7289-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Current climate models typically do not include full representation of ice sheets. As the climate warms and the ice sheets melt, they add freshwater to the ocean. This freshwater can influence climate change, for example by causing more sea ice to form. In this paper we propose a set of experiments to test the influence of this missing meltwater from Antarctica using multiple different climate models.
Christina Asmus, Peter Hoffmann, Joni-Pekka Pietikäinen, Jürgen Böhner, and Diana Rechid
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 7311–7337, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7311-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7311-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Irrigation modifies the land surface and soil conditions. The effects can be quantified using numerical climate models. Our study introduces a new irrigation parameterization, which simulates the effects of irrigation on land, atmosphere, and vegetation. We applied the parameterization and evaluated the results in terms of their physical consistency. We found an improvement in the model results in the 2 m temperature representation in comparison with observational data for our study.
Michael Meier and Christof Bigler
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 7171–7201, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7171-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7171-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We analyzed >2.3 million calibrations and 39 million projections of leaf coloration models, considering 21 models, 5 optimization algorithms, ≥7 sampling procedures, and 26 climate scenarios. Models based on temperature, day length, and leaf unfolding performed best, especially when calibrated with generalized simulated annealing and systematically balanced or stratified samples. Projected leaf coloration shifts between −13 and +20 days by 2080–2099.
Katharina Gallmeier, J. Xavier Prochaska, Peter Cornillon, Dimitris Menemenlis, and Madolyn Kelm
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 7143–7170, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7143-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7143-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper introduces an approach to evaluate numerical models of ocean circulation. We compare the structure of satellite-derived sea surface temperature anomaly (SSTa) instances determined by a machine learning algorithm at 10–80 km scales to those output by a high-resolution MITgcm run. The simulation over much of the ocean reproduces the observed distribution of SSTa patterns well. This general agreement, alongside a few notable exceptions, highlights the potential of this approach.
Angus Fotherby, Harold J. Bradbury, Jennifer L. Druhan, and Alexandra V. Turchyn
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 7059–7074, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7059-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7059-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We demonstrate how, given a simulation of fluid and rock interacting, we can emulate the system using machine learning. This means that, for a given initial condition, we can predict the final state, avoiding the simulation step once the model has been trained. We present a workflow for applying this approach to any fluid–rock simulation and showcase two applications to different fluid–rock simulations. This approach has applications for improving model development and sensitivity analyses.
Yaqi Wang, Lanning Wang, Juan Feng, Zhenya Song, Qizhong Wu, and Huaqiong Cheng
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6857–6873, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6857-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6857-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, to noticeably improve precipitation simulation in steep mountains, we propose a sub-grid parameterization scheme for the topographic vertical motion in CAM5-SE to revise the original vertical velocity by adding the topographic vertical motion. The dynamic lifting effect of topography is extended from the lowest layer to multiple layers, thus improving the positive deviations of precipitation simulation in high-altitude regions and negative deviations in low-altitude regions.
Jon Seddon, Ag Stephens, Matthew S. Mizielinski, Pier Luigi Vidale, and Malcolm J. Roberts
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6689–6700, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6689-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6689-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The PRIMAVERA project aimed to develop a new generation of advanced global climate models. The large volume of data generated was uploaded to a central analysis facility (CAF) and was analysed by 100 PRIMAVERA scientists there. We describe how the PRIMAVERA project used the CAF's facilities to enable users to analyse this large dataset. We believe that similar, multi-institute, big-data projects could also use a CAF to efficiently share, organise and analyse large volumes of data.
Maria-Theresia Pelz, Markus Schartau, Christopher J. Somes, Vanessa Lampe, and Thomas Slawig
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6609–6634, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6609-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6609-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Kernel density estimators (KDE) approximate the probability density of a data set without the assumption of an underlying distribution. We used the solution of the diffusion equation, and a new approximation of the optimal smoothing parameter build on two pilot estimation steps, to construct such a KDE best suited for typical characteristics of geoscientific data. The resulting KDE is insensitive to noise and well resolves multimodal data structures as well as boundary-close data.
Benjamin S. Grandey, Zhi Yang Koh, Dhrubajyoti Samanta, Benjamin P. Horton, Justin Dauwels, and Lock Yue Chew
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6593–6608, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6593-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6593-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Global climate models are susceptible to spurious trends known as drift. Fortunately, drift can be corrected when analysing data produced by models. To explore the uncertainty associated with drift correction, we develop a new method: Monte Carlo drift correction. For historical simulations of thermosteric sea level rise, drift uncertainty is relatively large. When analysing data susceptible to drift, researchers should consider drift uncertainty.
Michael Sigmond, James Anstey, Vivek Arora, Ruth Digby, Nathan Gillett, Viatcheslav Kharin, William Merryfield, Catherine Reader, John Scinocca, Neil Swart, John Virgin, Carsten Abraham, Jason Cole, Nicolas Lambert, Woo-Sung Lee, Yongxiao Liang, Elizaveta Malinina, Landon Rieger, Knut von Salzen, Christian Seiler, Clint Seinen, Andrew Shao, Reinel Sospedra-Alfonso, Libo Wang, and Duo Yang
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6553–6591, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6553-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6553-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We present a new activity which aims to organize the analysis of biases in the Canadian Earth System model (CanESM) in a systematic manner. Results of this “Analysis for Development” (A4D) activity includes a new CanESM version, CanESM5.1, which features substantial improvements regarding the simulation of dust and stratospheric temperatures, a second CanESM5.1 variant with reduced climate sensitivity, and insights into potential avenues to reduce various other model biases.
Shuaiqi Tang, Adam C. Varble, Jerome D. Fast, Kai Zhang, Peng Wu, Xiquan Dong, Fan Mei, Mikhail Pekour, Joseph C. Hardin, and Po-Lun Ma
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6355–6376, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6355-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6355-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
To assess the ability of Earth system model (ESM) predictions, we developed a tool called ESMAC Diags to understand how aerosols, clouds, and aerosol–cloud interactions are represented in ESMs. This paper describes its version 2 functionality. We compared the model predictions with measurements taken by planes, ships, satellites, and ground instruments over four regions across the world. Results show that this new tool can help identify model problems and guide future development of ESMs.
Xinzhu Yu, Li Liu, Chao Sun, Qingu Jiang, Biao Zhao, Zhiyuan Zhang, Hao Yu, and Bin Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6285–6308, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6285-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6285-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper we propose a new common, flexible, and efficient parallel I/O framework for earth system modeling based on C-Coupler2.0. CIOFC1.0 can handle data I/O in parallel and provides a configuration file format that enables users to conveniently change the I/O configurations. It can automatically make grid and time interpolation, output data with an aperiodic time series, and accelerate data I/O when the field size is large.
Toshiki Matsushima, Seiya Nishizawa, and Shin-ichiro Shima
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6211–6245, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6211-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6211-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
A particle-based cloud model was developed for meter- to submeter-scale resolution in cloud simulations. Our new cloud model's computational performance is superior to a bin method and comparable to a two-moment bulk method. A highlight of this study is the 2 m resolution shallow cloud simulations over an area covering ∼10 km2. This model allows for studying turbulence and cloud physics at spatial scales that overlap with those covered by direct numerical simulations and field studies.
Anthony Schrapffer, Jan Polcher, Anna Sörensson, and Lluís Fita
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5755–5782, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5755-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5755-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The present paper introduces a floodplain scheme for a high-resolution land surface model river routing. It was developed and evaluated over one of the world’s largest floodplains: the Pantanal in South America. This shows the impact of tropical floodplains on land surface conditions (soil moisture, temperature) and on land–atmosphere fluxes and highlights the potential impact of floodplains on land–atmosphere interactions and the importance of integrating this module in coupled simulations.
Jérémy Bernard, Fredrik Lindberg, and Sandro Oswald
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5703–5727, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5703-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5703-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The UMEP plug-in integrated in the free QGIS software can now calculate the spatial variation of the wind speed within urban settings. This paper shows that the new wind model, URock, generally fits observations well and highlights the main needed improvements. According to this work, pedestrian wind fields and outdoor thermal comfort can now simply be estimated by any QGIS user (researchers, students, and practitioners).
Jonathan King, Jessica Tierney, Matthew Osman, Emily J. Judd, and Kevin J. Anchukaitis
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5653–5683, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5653-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5653-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Paleoclimate data assimilation is a useful method that allows researchers to combine climate models with natural archives of past climates. However, it can be difficult to implement in practice. To facilitate this method, we present DASH, a MATLAB toolbox. The toolbox provides routines that implement common steps of paleoclimate data assimilation, and it can be used to implement assimilations for a wide variety of time periods, spatial regions, data networks, and analytical algorithms.
Kirsten L. Findell, Zun Yin, Eunkyo Seo, Paul A. Dirmeyer, Nathan P. Arnold, Nathaniel Chaney, Megan D. Fowler, Meng Huang, David M. Lawrence, Po-Lun Ma, and Joseph A. Santanello Jr.
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2048, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2048, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We outline a request for sub-daily data to accurately capture the process-level connections between land states, surface fluxes, and the boundary layer response. This high-frequency model output will allow for more direct comparison with observational field campaigns on process-relevant time scales, enable demonstration of inter-model spread in land-atmosphere coupling processes, and aid in targeted identification of sources of deficiencies and opportunities for improvement of the models.
Siddhartha Bishnu, Robert R. Strauss, and Mark R. Petersen
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5539–5559, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5539-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5539-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Here we test Julia, a relatively new programming language, which is designed to be simple to write, but also fast on advanced computer architectures. We found that Julia is both convenient and fast, but there is no free lunch. Our first attempt to develop an ocean model in Julia was relatively easy, but the code was slow. After several months of further development, we created a Julia code that is as fast on supercomputers as a Fortran ocean model.
Tyler Kukla, Daniel E. Ibarra, Kimberly V. Lau, and Jeremy K. C. Rugenstein
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5515–5538, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5515-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5515-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The CH2O-CHOO TRAIN model can simulate how climate and the long-term carbon cycle interact across millions of years on a standard PC. While efficient, the model accounts for many factors including the location of land masses, the spatial pattern of the water cycle, and fundamental climate feedbacks. The model is a powerful tool for investigating how short-term climate processes can affect long-term changes in the Earth system.
Jason Neil Steven Cole, Knut von Salzen, Jiangnan Li, John Scinocca, David Plummer, Vivek Arora, Norman McFarlane, Michael Lazare, Murray MacKay, and Diana Verseghy
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5427–5448, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5427-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5427-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The Canadian Atmospheric Model version 5 (CanAM5) is used to simulate on a global scale the climate of Earth's atmosphere, land, and lakes. We document changes to the physics in CanAM5 since the last major version of the model (CanAM4) and evaluate the climate simulated relative to observations and CanAM4. The climate simulated by CanAM5 is similar to CanAM4, but there are improvements, including better simulation of temperature and precipitation over the Amazon and better simulation of cloud.
Florian Zabel and Benjamin Poschlod
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5383–5399, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5383-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5383-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Today, most climate model data are provided at daily time steps. However, more and more models from different sectors, such as energy, water, agriculture, and health, require climate information at a sub-daily temporal resolution for a more robust and reliable climate impact assessment. Here we describe and validate the Teddy tool, a new model for the temporal disaggregation of daily climate model data for climate impact analysis.
Young-Chan Noh, Yonghan Choi, Hyo-Jong Song, Kevin Raeder, Joo-Hong Kim, and Youngchae Kwon
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5365–5382, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5365-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5365-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This is the first attempt to assimilate the observations of microwave temperature sounders into the global climate forecast model in which the satellite observations have not been assimilated in the past. To do this, preprocessing schemes are developed to make the satellite observations suitable to be assimilated. In the assimilation experiments, the model analysis is significantly improved by assimilating the observations of microwave temperature sounders.
Cenlin He, Prasanth Valayamkunnath, Michael Barlage, Fei Chen, David Gochis, Ryan Cabell, Tim Schneider, Roy Rasmussen, Guo-Yue Niu, Zong-Liang Yang, Dev Niyogi, and Michael Ek
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5131–5151, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5131-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5131-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Noah-MP is one of the most widely used open-source community land surface models in the world, designed for applications ranging from uncoupled land surface and ecohydrological process studies to coupled numerical weather prediction and decadal climate simulations. To facilitate model developments and applications, we modernize Noah-MP by adopting modern Fortran code and data structures and standards, which substantially enhance model modularity, interoperability, and applicability.
Xiaoxu Shi, Alexandre Cauquoin, Gerrit Lohmann, Lukas Jonkers, Qiang Wang, Hu Yang, Yuchen Sun, and Martin Werner
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5153–5178, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5153-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5153-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a new climate model with isotopic capabilities and simulated the pre-industrial and mid-Holocene periods. Despite certain regional model biases, the modeled isotope composition is in good agreement with observations and reconstructions. Based on our analyses, the observed isotope–temperature relationship in polar regions may have a summertime bias. Using daily model outputs, we developed a novel isotope-based approach to determine the onset date of the West African summer monsoon.
Emma Howard, Chun-Hsu Su, Christian Stassen, Rajashree Naha, Harvey Ye, Acacia Pepler, Samuel S. Bell, Andrew J. Dowdy, Simon O. Tucker, and Charmaine Franklin
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-156, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-156, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
1. The BARPA-R modelling configuration has been developed to produce high resolution climate hazard projections within the Australian Region. 2. When using boundary driving data from quasi-observed historical conditions, BARPA-R shows good performance with errors generally on par with reanalysis products. 3. BARPA-R also captures trends, known modes of climate variability, large-scale weather processes, and multivariate relationships.
Jianfeng Li, Kai Zhang, Taufiq Hassan, Shixuan Zhang, Po-Lun Ma, Balwinder Singh, Qiyang Yan, and Huilin Huang
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-73, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-73, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
By comparing E3SM simulations with and without regional refinement, we find that model horizontal grid spacing considerably affects the simulated aerosol mass budget, aerosol-cloud interactions, and the effective radiative forcing of anthropogenic aerosols. The study identifies the critical physical processes strongly influenced by model resolution. It also highlights the benefit of applying regional refinement in future modeling studies at higher or even convection-permitting resolutions.
Karl E. Taylor
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-177, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-177, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
Remapping gridded data in a way that preserves the conservative properties of the climate system can be essential in coupling model components and for accurate assessment of the system’s energy and mass constituents. Remapping packages capable of handling a wide variety of grids can, for common grids, calculate remapping weights that are somewhat inaccurate. Correcting for these errors, guidelines are provided to ensure conservation when the weights are used in practice.
Andrew Gettelman
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4937–4956, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4937-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4937-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
A representation of rainbows is developed for a climate model. The diagnostic raises many common issues. Simulated rainbows are evaluated against limited observations. The pattern of rainbows in the model matches observations and theory about when and where rainbows are most common. The diagnostic is used to assess the past and future state of rainbows. Changes to clouds from climate change are expected to increase rainbows as cloud cover decreases in a warmer world.
Sven Karsten, Hagen Radtke, Matthias Gröger, Ha T. M. Ho-Hagemann, Hossein Mashayekh, Thomas Neumann, and H. E. Markus Meier
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-166, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-166, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes the development of a regional Earth System Model for the Baltic Sea region. In contrast to conventional coupling approaches, the presented model includes a flux calculator operating on a common exchange grid. This approach automatically ensures a locally consistent treatment of fluxes and simplifies the exchange of model components. The presented model can be used for various scientific questions, such as studies of natural variability and ocean-atmosphere interactions.
Donghui Xu, Gautam Bisht, Zeli Tan, Chang Liao, Tian Zhou, Hong-Yi Li, and Lai-Yung Ruby Leung
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1879, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1879, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We aim to disentangle the hydrological and hydraulic controls on streamflow variability in a fully coupled Earth System Model. We found that calibrate only one process (i.e., traditional calibration procedure) will result in unrealistic parameter values and poor performance of water cycle, while the simulated streamflow is improved. To address this issue, we further proposed a two-step calibration procedure to reconcile the impacts from hydrological and hydraulic processes on streamflow.
Ralf Hand, Eric Samakinwa, Laura Lipfert, and Stefan Brönnimann
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4853–4866, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4853-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4853-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
ModE-Sim is an ensemble of simulations with an atmosphere model. It uses observed sea surface temperatures, sea ice conditions, and volcanic aerosols for 1420 to 2009 as model input while accounting for uncertainties in these conditions. This generates several representations of the possible climate given these preconditions. Such a setup can be useful to understand the mechanisms that contribute to climate variability. This paper describes the setup of ModE-Sim and evaluates its performance.
Andrea Storto, Yassmin Hesham Essa, Vincenzo de Toma, Alessandro Anav, Gianmaria Sannino, Rosalia Santoleri, and Chunxue Yang
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4811–4833, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4811-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4811-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Regional climate models are a fundamental tool for a very large number of applications and are being increasingly used within climate services, together with other complementary approaches. Here, we introduce a new regional coupled model, intended to be later extended to a full Earth system model, for climate investigations within the Mediterranean region, coupled data assimilation experiments, and several downscaling exercises (reanalyses and long-range predictions).
Anna L. Merrifield, Lukas Brunner, Ruth Lorenz, Vincent Humphrey, and Reto Knutti
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4715–4747, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4715-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4715-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Using all Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) models is unfeasible for many applications. We provide a subselection protocol that balances user needs for model independence, performance, and spread capturing CMIP’s projection uncertainty simultaneously. We show how sets of three to five models selected for European applications map to user priorities. An audit of model independence and its influence on equilibrium climate sensitivity uncertainty in CMIP is also presented.
Fiona Raphaela Spuler, Jakob Benjamin Wessel, Edward Comyn-Platt, James Varndell, and Chiara Cagnazzo
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1481, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1481, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Bias adjustment is commonly applied to climate models before using them to study the impacts of climate change to ensure the correspondence of models with observations at a local scale. However, this can introduce undesirable distortions in the climate model. In this paper, we present an open-source python package called ibicus to enable the comparison and detailed evaluation of bias adjustment methods to facilitate their transparent and rigorous application.
Martin Butzin, Ying Ye, Christoph Völker, Özgür Gürses, Judith Hauck, and Peter Köhler
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1718, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1718, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper we describe the implementation of the carbon isotopes 13C and 14C into the marine biogeochemistry model FESOM2.1-REcoM3 and present results of long-term test simulations. Our model results are largely consistent with marine carbon isotope reconstructions for the pre-anthropogenic period but also also exhibit some discrepancies.
Bin Mu, Xiaodan Luo, Shijin Yuan, and Xi Liang
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4677–4697, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4677-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4677-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
To improve the long-term forecast skill for sea ice extent (SIE), we introduce IceTFT, which directly predicts 12 months of averaged Arctic SIE. The results show that IceTFT has higher forecasting skill. We conducted a sensitivity analysis of the variables in the IceTFT model. These sensitivities can help researchers study the mechanisms of sea ice development, and they also provide useful references for the selection of variables in data assimilation or the input of deep learning models.
Abhiraj Bishnoi, Olaf Stein, Catrin I. Meyer, René Redler, Norbert Eicker, Helmuth Haak, Lars Hoffmann, Daniel Klocke, Luis Kornblueh, and Estela Suarez
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1476, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1476, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We enabled the weather and climate model ICON to run in a high-resolution coupled atmosphere-ocean setup on the JUWELS supercomputer, where the ocean and the model I/O runs on the CPU Cluster, while the atmosphere is running simultaneously on GPUs. Compared to a simulation performed on CPUs only, our approach reduces energy consumption by 59 % with comparable runtimes. The experiments serve as preparation for efficient computing of kilometer-scale climate models on future supercomputing systems.
Laura Muntjewerf, Richard Bintanja, Thomas Reerink, and Karin van der Wiel
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4581–4597, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4581-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4581-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The KNMI Large Ensemble Time Slice (KNMI–LENTIS) is a large ensemble of global climate model simulations with EC-Earth3. It covers two climate scenarios by focusing on two time slices: the present day (2000–2009) and a future +2 K climate (2075–2084 in the SSP2-4.5 scenario). We have 1600 simulated years for the two climates with (sub-)daily output frequency. The sampled climate variability allows for robust and in-depth research into (compound) extreme events such as heat waves and droughts.
Yi-Chi Wang, Wan-Ling Tseng, Yu-Luen Chen, Shih-Yu Lee, Huang-Hsiung Hsu, and Hsin-Chien Liang
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4599–4616, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4599-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4599-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study focuses on evaluating the performance of the Taiwan Earth System Model version 1 (TaiESM1) in simulating the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO), a significant tropical climate pattern with global impacts. Our findings reveal that TaiESM1 effectively captures several characteristics of ENSO, such as its seasonal variation and remote teleconnections. Its pronounced ENSO strength bias is also thoroughly investigated, aiming to gain insights to improve climate model performance.
Raghul Parthipan, Hannah M. Christensen, J. Scott Hosking, and Damon J. Wischik
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4501–4519, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4501-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4501-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
How can we create better climate models? We tackle this by proposing a data-driven successor to the existing approach for capturing key temporal trends in climate models. We combine probability, allowing us to represent uncertainty, with machine learning, a technique to learn relationships from data which are undiscoverable to humans. Our model is often superior to existing baselines when tested in a simple atmospheric simulation.
Allison B. Collow, Peter R. Colarco, Arlindo M. da Silva, Virginie Buchard, Huisheng Bian, Mian Chin, Sampa Das, Ravi Govidaraju, Dongchul Kim, and Valentina Aquila
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-129, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-129, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
The GOCART aerosol module within the Goddard Earth Observing System, recently underwent a major refactoring and update to the representation of physical processes. Code changes that were included in GOCART 2nd Generation (GOCART-2G) are documented and we establish a benchmark simulation that is to be used for future development of the system. The four-year benchmark simulation was evaluated using in situ and space borne measurements to develop a baseline and prioritize future development.
Skyler Graap and Colin M. Zarzycki
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1450, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1450, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
A key target for improving climate models is how low, bright clouds are predicted over tropical oceans since they have important consequences for the Earth's energy budget. A climate model has been updated to improve the physical realism of the treatment of how momentum is moved up and down in the atmosphere. By comparing this updated model to real-world observations by balloon launches, it can be shown to more accurately depict atmospheric structure in trade-wind areas close to the Equator.
Cited articles
Albrecht, B. A., Betts, A. K., Schubert, W. H., and Cox, S. K.: Model of the
Thermodynamic Structure of the Trade-Wind Boundary Layer: Part I.
Theoretical Formulation and Sensitivity Tests, J. Atmos. Sci., 36, 73–89,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1979)036<0073:MOTTSO>2.0.CO;2, 1979.
Alexander, G. D. and Cotton, W. R.: The Use of Cloud-Resolving Simulations
of Mesoscale Convective Systems to Build a Mesoscale Parameterization
Scheme, J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 2137–2161,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1998)055<2137:TUOCRS>2.0.CO;2, 1998.
Allan, R. P. and Soden, B. J.: Atmospheric Warming and the Amplification of
Precipitation Extremes, Science, 321, 1481–1484,
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1160787,2008.
Anderson, J. L., Balaji, V., Broccoli, A. J., Cooke, W. F., Delworth, T. L.,
Dixon, K. W., Donner, L. J., Dunne, K. A., Freidenreich, S. M., Garner, S.
T., and Gudgel, R. G.: The New GFDL Global Atmosphere and Land Model
AM2–LM2: Evaluation with Prescribed SST Simulations, J. Climate, 17,
4641–4673, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-3223.1, 2004.
Añel, J. A., García-Rodríguez, M., and Rodeiro, J.: Current status on the need for improved accessibility to climate models code, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 923–934, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-923-2021, 2021.
Angevine, W. M.: An Integrated Turbulence Scheme for Boundary Layers with
Shallow Cumulus Applied to Pollutant Transport, J. Appl. Meteorol., 44,
1436–1452, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2284.1, 2005.
Angevine, W. M., Jiang, H., and Mauritsen, T.: Performance of an Eddy
Diffusivity–Mass Flux Scheme for Shallow Cumulus Boundary Layers, Mon.
Weather Rev., 138, 2895–2912, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010MWR3142.1, 2010.
Anthes, R. A.: A Cumulus Parameterization Scheme Utilizing a One-Dimensional
Cloud Model, Mon. Weather Rev., 138, 2895–2912,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1977)105<0270:ACPSUA>2.0.CO;2, 1977.
Arakawa, A.: Parameterization of cumulus convection, Proceedings of WMO/IUGG
Symposium, Numerical Weather Prediction, Japan Meteorological Agency, IV,8,
1–6, 1969.
Arakawa, A.: The Cumulus Parameterization Problem: Past, Present, and
Future, J. Climate, 17, 2493–2525,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<2493:RATCPP>2.0.CO;2, 2004.
Arakawa, A. and Schubert, W. H.: Interaction of a Cumulus Cloud Ensemble
with the Large-Scale Environment, Part I., J. Atmos. Sci., 31, 674–701,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1974)031<0674:IOACCE>2.0.CO;2, 1974.
Arakawa, A. and Wu, C.-M.: A Unified Representation of Deep Moist Convection
in Numerical Modeling of the Atmosphere. Part I, J. Atmos. Sci., 70,
1977–1992, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0330.1, 2013.
Arakawa, A., Jung, J.-H., and Wu, C.-M.: Toward unification of the multiscale modeling of the atmosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3731–3742, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3731-2011, 2011.
Asai, T. and Kasahara, A.: A Theoretical Study of the Compensating Downward
Motions Associated with Cumulus Clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 24, 487–496,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1967)024<0487:ATSOTC>2.0.CO;2, 1967.
Baba, Y.: Spectral cumulus parameterization based on cloud-resolving model,
Clim. Dynam., 52, 309–334, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4137-z, 2019.
Baik, J.-J., DeMaria, M., and Raman, S.: Tropical Cyclone Simulations with
the Betts Convective Adjustment Scheme. Part II: Sensitivity Experiments,
Mon. Weather Rev., 118, 529–541,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1990)118<0529:TCSWTB>2.0.CO;2, 1990.
Bak, P., Tang, C., and Wiesenfeld, K.: Self-organized criticality: An explanation of the 1/f noise, Phys. Rev. Lett., 59, 381, https://doi.org/10.1103/PHYSREVLETT.59.381, 1987.
Baldwin, M. E., Kain, J. S., and Kay, M. P.: Properties of the Convection
Scheme in NCEP's Eta Model that Affect Forecast Sounding Interpretation,
Weather Forecast., 17, 1063–1079,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(2002)017<1063:POTCSI>2.0.CO;2, 2002.
Barros, D. F., Albernaz, A. L. M., Barros, D. F., and Albernaz, A. L. M.:
Possible impacts of climate change on wetlands and its biota in the
Brazilian Amazon, Braz. J. Biol., 74, 810–820,
https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.04013, 2014.
Bechtold, P. (Ed.): Atmospheric moist convection, Meteorological Training Course
Lecture Series, ECMWF, https://www.ecmwf.int/node/16953 (last access: 10 September 2021), 2019.
Bechtold, P., Pinty, J. P., and Fravalo, C.: A Model of Marine
Boundary-Layer Cloudiness for Mesoscale Applications, J. Atmos. Sci., 49,
1723–1744, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1992)049<1723:AMOMBL>2.0.CO;2, 1992.
Bechtold, P., Cuijpers, J. W. M., Mascart, P., and Trouilhet, P.: Modeling
of Trade Wind Cumuli with a Low-Order Turbulence Model: Toward a Unified
Description of Cu and Se Clouds in Meteorological Models, J. Atmos. Sci.,
52, 455–463, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1995)052<0455:MOTWCW>2.0.CO;2, 1995.
Bechtold, P., Bazile, E., Guichard, F., Mascart, P., and Richard, E.: A
mass-flux convection scheme for regional and global models, Q. J. Roy.
Meteor. Soc., 127, 869–886, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712757309, 2001.
Bechtold, P., Chaboureau, J.-P., Beljaars, A., Betts, A. K., Köhler, M.,
Miller, M., and Redelsperger, J.-L.: The simulation of the diurnal cycle of
convective precipitation over land in a global model, Q. J. Roy. Meteor.
Soc., 130, 3119–3137, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.03.103, 2004.
Bechtold, P., Köhler, M., Jung, T., Doblas-Reyes, F., Leutbecher, M.,
Rodwell, M. J., Vitart, F., and Balsamo, G.: Advances in simulating
atmospheric variability with the ECMWF model: From synoptic to decadal
time-scales, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 134, 1337–1351,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.289, 2008.
Bechtold, P., Semane, N., Lopez, P., Chaboureau, J.-P., Beljaars, A., and
Bormann, N.: Representing Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Convection in
Large-Scale Models, J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 734–753,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-0163.1, 2014.
Becker, T. and Hohenegger, C.: Estimating Bulk Entrainment for Deep Convection – from Idealized to Realistic Simulations, American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2018, Washington, D.C., abstract #A21K-2864, 21, 2018.
Becker, T., Bechtold, P., and Sandu, I.: Characteristics of convective precipitation over tropical Africa in storm‐resolving global simulations, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 147, 4388–4407, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4185, 2021.
Bengtsson, L., Körnich, H., Källén, E., and Svensson, G.:
Large-Scale Dynamical Response to Subgrid-Scale Organization Provided by
Cellular Automata, J. Atmos. Sci., 68, 3132–3144,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-10-05028.1, 2011.
Bengtsson, L., Steinheimer, M., Bechtold, P., and Geleyn, J.-F.: A
stochastic parametrization for deep convection using cellular automata, Q.
J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 139, 1533–1543, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2108,
2013.
Bengtsson, L., Bao, J.-W., Pegion, P., Penland, C., Michelson, S., and
Whitaker, J.: A Model Framework for Stochastic Representation of
Uncertainties Associated with Physical Processes in NOAA's Next Generation
Global Prediction System (NGGPS), Mon. Weather Rev., 147, 893–911,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-18-0238.1, 2019.
Bengtsson, L., Dias, J., Tulich, S., Gehne, M., and Bao, J.-W.: A Stochastic
Parameterization of Organized Tropical Convection Using Cellular Automata
for Global Forecasts in NOAA's Unified Forecast System, J. Adv. Model Earth
Sy.,
13, e2020MS002260, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002260, 2021.
Berg, L. K., Gustafson, W. I., Kassianov, E. I., and Deng, L.: Evaluation of
a Modified Scheme for Shallow Convection: Implementation of CuP and Case
Studies, Mon. Weather Rev., 141, 134–147,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-12-00136.1, 2013.
Betts, A. K.: Parametric Interpretation of Trade-Wind Cumulus Budget
Studies, J. Atmos. Sci., 32, 1934–1945,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1975)032<1934:PIOTWC>2.0.CO;2, 1975.
Betts, A. K.: Saturation Point Analysis of Moist Convective Overturning, J.
Atmos. Sci., 39, 1484–1505,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1982)039<1484:SPAOMC>2.0.CO;2, 1982.
Betts, A. K.: Mixing Line Analysis of Clouds and Cloudy Boundary Layers, J.
Atmos. Sci., 42, 2751–2763,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1985)042<2751:MLAOCA>2.0.CO;2, 1985.
Betts, A. K.: A new convective adjustment scheme. Part I: Observational and
theoretical basis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 112, 677–691,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49711247307, 1986.
Betts, A. K. and Albrecht, B. A.: Conserved Variable Analysis of the
Convective Boundary Layer Thermodynamic Structure over the Tropical Oceans,
J. Atmos. Sci., 44, 83–99,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1987)044<0083:CVAOTC>2.0.CO;2, 1987.
Betts, A. K. and Jakob, C.: Evaluation of the diurnal cycle of
precipitation, surface thermodynamics, and surface fluxes in the ECMWF model
using LBA data, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, LBA 12-1–LBA 12-8,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000427, 2002.
Betts, A. K. and Miller, M. J.: A new convective adjustment scheme. Part II:
Single column tests using GATE wave, BOMEX, ATEX and arctic air-mass data
sets, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 112, 693–709,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49711247308, 1986.
Bhatla, R., Ghosh, S., Mandal, B., Mall, R. K., and Sharma, K.: Simulation
of Indian summer monsoon onset with different parameterization convection
schemes of RegCM-4.3, Atmos. Res., 176–177, 10–18,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.02.010, 2016.
Bhattacharya, R., Bordoni, S., Suselj, K., and Teixeira, J.:
Parameterization Interactions in Global Aquaplanet Simulations, J. Adv.
Model Earth Sy., 10, 403–420, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS000991, 2018.
Blyth, A. M.: Entrainment in Cumulus Clouds, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 32,
626–641, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1993)032<0626:EICC>2.0.CO;2, 1993.
Blyth, A. M., Cooper, W. A., and Jensen, J. B.: A Study of the Source of
Entrained Air in Montana Cumuli, J. Atmos. Sci., 45, 3944–3964,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1988)045<3944:ASOTSO>2.0.CO;2, 1988.
Boatman, J. F. and Auer, A. H.: The Role of Cloud Top Entrainment in Cumulus
Clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 40, 1517–1534,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1983)040<1517:TROCTE>2.0.CO;2, 1983.
Bogenschutz, P. A. and Krueger, S. K.: A simplified PDF parameterization of
subgrid-scale clouds and turbulence for cloud-resolving models, J. Adv.
Model Earth Sy., 5, 195–211, https://doi.org/10.1002/jame.20018, 2013.
Bogenschutz, P. A., Krueger, S. K., and Khairoutdinov, M.: Assumed
Probability Density Functions for Shallow and Deep Convection, J. Adv. Model
Earth Sy., 2, 10, https://doi.org/10.3894/JAMES.2010.2.10, 2010.
Böing, S. J.: An object-based model for convective cold pool dynamics, Mathematics of Climate and Weather Forecasting, 2, 43–60, https://doi.org/10.1515/mcwf-2016-0003, 2016.
Böing, S. J., Jonker, H. J. J., Siebesma, A. P., and Grabowski, W. W.:
Influence of the Subcloud Layer on the Development of a Deep Convective
Ensemble, J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 2682–2698,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-0317.1, 2012.
Böing, S. J., Jonker, H. J. J., Nawara, W. A., and Siebesma, A. P.: On
the Deceiving Aspects of Mixing Diagrams of Deep Cumulus Convection, J.
Atmos. Sci., 71, 56–68, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-0127.1, 2014.
Bombardi, R. J., Schneider, E. K., Marx, L., Halder, S., Singh, B., Tawfik,
A. B., Dirmeyer, P. A., and Kinter, J. L.: Improvements in the
representation of the Indian summer monsoon in the NCEP climate forecast
system version 2, Clim. Dynam., 45, 2485–2498,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2484-6, 2015.
Bombardi, R. J., Tawfik, A. B., Manganello, J. V., Marx, L., Shin, C.-S.,
Halder, S., Schneider, E. K., Dirmeyer, P. A., and Kinter, J. L.: The heated
condensation framework as a convective trigger in the NCEP Climate Forecast
System version 2, J. Adv. Model Earth Sy., 8, 1310–1329,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016MS000668, 2016.
Bony, S. and Dufresne, J.-L.: Marine boundary layer clouds at the heart of
tropical cloud feedback uncertainties in climate models, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 32, L20806, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023851, 2005.
Bony, S. and Emanuel, K. A.: A Parameterization of the Cloudiness Associated
with Cumulus Convection; Evaluation Using TOGA COARE Data, J. Atmos. Sci.,
58, 3158–3183, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058<3158:APOTCA>2.0.CO;2, 2001.
Bony, S., Stevens, B., Frierson, D. M. W., Jakob, C., Kageyama, M., Pincus,
R., Shepherd, T. G., Sherwood, S. C., Siebesma, A. P., Sobel, A. H.,
Watanabe, M., and Webb, M. J.: Clouds, circulation and climate sensitivity,
Nat. Geosci, 8, 261–268, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2398, 2015.
Bony, S., Stevens, B., Ament, F., Bigorre, S., Chazette, P., Crewell, S.,
Delanoë, J., Emanuel, K., Farrell, D., Flamant, C., Gross, S., Hirsch,
L., Karstensen, J., Mayer, B., Nuijens, L., Ruppert, J. H., Sandu, I.,
Siebesma, P., Speich, S., Szczap, F., Totems, J., Vogel, R., Wendisch, M.,
and Wirth, M.: EUREC4A: A Field Campaign to Elucidate the Couplings Between
Clouds, Convection and Circulation, Surv. Geophys., 38, 1529–1568,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-017-9428-0, 2017.
Bougeault, P.: Cloud-Ensemble Relations Based on the Gamma Probability
Distribution for the Higher-Order Models of the Planetary Boundary Layer, J.
Atmos. Sci., 39, 2691–2700,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1982)039<2691:CERBOT>2.0.CO;2, 1982.
Bougeault, P.: A Simple Parameterization of the Large-Scale Effects of
Cumulus Convection, Mon. Weather Rev., 113, 2108–2121,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1985)113<2108:ASPOTL>2.0.CO;2, 1985.
Brast, M., Schemann, V., and Neggers, R. A. J.: Investigating the Scale
Adaptivity of a Size-Filtered Mass Flux Parameterization in the Gray Zone of
Shallow Cumulus Convection, J. Atmos. Sci., 75, 1195–1214,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0231.1, 2018.
Bretherton, C. S., McCaa, J. R., and Grenier, H.: A New Parameterization for
Shallow Cumulus Convection and Its Application to Marine Subtropical
Cloud-Topped Boundary Layers. Part I: Description and 1D Results, Mon.
Weather Rev., 132, 864–882,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<0864:ANPFSC>2.0.CO;2, 2004.
Bright, D. R. and Mullen, S. L.: Short-Range Ensemble Forecasts of
Precipitation during the Southwest Monsoon, Weather Forecast., 17,
1080–1100, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(2002)017<1080:SREFOP>2.0.CO;2, 2002.
Brisson, E., Van Weverberg, K., Demuzere, M., Devis, A., Saeed, S., Stengel,
M., and van Lipzig, N. P. M.: How well can a convection-permitting climate
model reproduce decadal statistics of precipitation, temperature and cloud
characteristics?, Clim. Dynam., 47, 3043–3061,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3012-z, 2016.
Bryan, G. H., Wyngaard, J. C., and Fritsch, J. M.: Resolution Requirements
for the Simulation of Deep Moist Convection, Mon. Weather Rev., 131,
2394–2416, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2003)131<2394:RRFTSO>2.0.CO;2, 2003.
Buizza, R., Milleer, M., and Palmer, T. N.: Stochastic representation of model uncertainties in the ECMWF ensemble prediction system, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125, 2887–2908, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712556006, 1999.
Burnet, F. and Brenguier, J.-L.: Observational Study of the
Entrainment-Mixing Process in Warm Convective Clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 64,
1995–2011, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3928.1, 2007.
Cahalan, R. F., Ridgway, W., Wiscombe, W. J., Bell, T. L., and Snider, J.
B.: The Albedo of Fractal Stratocumulus Clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 51,
2434–2455, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1994)051<2434:TAOFSC>2.0.CO;2, 1994.
Chaboureau, J.-P. and Bechtold, P.: A Simple Cloud Parameterization Derived
from Cloud Resolving Model Data: Diagnostic and Prognostic Applications, J.
Atmos. Sci., 59, 2362–2372,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<2362:ASCPDF>2.0.CO;2, 2002.
Chaboureau, J.-P. and Bechtold, P.: Statistical representation of clouds in
a regional model and the impact on the diurnal cycle of convection during
Tropical Convection, Cirrus and Nitrogen Oxides (TROCCINOX), J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos.,
110, D17103, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005645, 2005.
Charney, J. G. and Eliassen, A.: On the Growth of the Hurricane Depression,
J. Atmos. Sci., 21, 68–75,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1964)021<0068:OTGOTH>2.0.CO;2, 1964.
Chatfield, R. B. and Brost, R. A.: A two-stream model of the vertical
transport of trace species in the convective boundary layer, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 92, 13263–13276, https://doi.org/10.1029/JD092iD11p13263,
1987.
Cheinet, S.: A Multiple Mass-Flux Parameterization for the Surface-Generated
Convection. Part I: Dry Plumes, J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 2313–2327,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060<2313:AMMPFT>2.0.CO;2, 2003.
Cheinet, S.: A Multiple Mass Flux Parameterization for the Surface-Generated
Convection. Part II: Cloudy Cores, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 1093–1113,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<1093:AMMFPF>2.0.CO;2, 2004.
Cheng, A. and Xu, K.-M.: Simulation of shallow cumuli and their transition
to deep convective clouds by cloud-resolving models with different
third-order turbulence closures, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 132, 359–382,
https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.05.29, 2006.
Chikira, M.: A Cumulus Parameterization with State-Dependent Entrainment
Rate. Part II: Impact on Climatology in a General Circulation Model, J.
Atmos. Sci., 67, 2194–2211, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAS3317.1, 2010.
Chikira, M. and Sugiyama, M.: A Cumulus Parameterization with
State-Dependent Entrainment Rate. Part I: Description and Sensitivity to
Temperature and Humidity Profiles, J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 2171–2193,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAS3316.1, 2010.
Choat, B., Jansen, S., Brodribb, T. J., Cochard, H., Delzon, S., Bhaskar,
R., Bucci, S. J., Feild, T. S., Gleason, S. M., Hacke, U. G., Jacobsen, A.
L., Lens, F., Maherali, H., Martínez-Vilalta, J., Mayr, S., Mencuccini,
M., Mitchell, P. J., Nardini, A., Pittermann, J., Pratt, R. B., Sperry, J.
S., Westoby, M., Wright, I. J., and Zanne, A. E.: Global convergence in the
vulnerability of forests to drought, Nature, 491, 752–755,
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11688, 2012.
Chopard, B.: Cellular Automata Modeling of Physical Systems, in:
Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science, edited by: Meyers, R. A.,
Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science Springer, New York, NY,
865–892, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3_57, 2009.
Cohen, Y., Lopez-Gomez, I., Jaruga, A., He, J., Kaul, C. M., and Schneider,
T.: Unified Entrainment and Detrainment Closures for Extended
Eddy-Diffusivity Mass-Flux Schemes, J. Adv. Model Earth Sy., 12,
e2020MS002162, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002162, 2020.
Colin, M.: Convective memory, and the role of cold pools, Meteorology, Sorbonne Université, HAL Id: tel-02864797, 2018.
Colin, M., Sherwood, S., Geoffroy, O., Bony, S., and Fuchs, D.: Identifying
the Sources of Convective Memory in Cloud-Resolving Simulations, J. Atmos.
Sci., 76, 947–962, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0036.1, 2019.
Collier, J. C. and Bowman, K. P.: Diurnal cycle of tropical precipitation in
a general circulation model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D17105,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004818, 2004.
Couvreux, F., Hourdin, F., Williamson, D., Roehrig, R., Volodina, V.,
Villefranque, N., Rio, C., Audouin, O., Salter, J., Bazile, E., Brient, F.,
Favot, F., Honnert, R., Lefebvre, M.-P., Madeleine, J.-B., Rodier, Q., and
Xu, W.: Process-Based Climate Model Development Harnessing Machine Learning:
I. A Calibration Tool for Parameterization Improvement, J. Adv. Model Earth
Sy., 13, e2020MS002217, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002217, 2021.
Cotton, W. and Anthes, R.: Storm and Cloud Dynamics, 1st edn., Academic Press, 1992.
Craig, G. C. and Cohen, B. G.: Fluctuations in an Equilibrium Convective
Ensemble. Part I: Theoretical Formulation, J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 1996–2004,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3709.1, 2006.
Dai, A.: Precipitation Characteristics in Eighteen Coupled Climate Models,
J. Climate, 19, 4605–4630, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3884.1, 2006.
Dai, A. and Trenberth, K. E.: The Diurnal Cycle and Its Depiction in the
Community Climate System Model, J. Climate, 17, 930–951,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<0930:TDCAID>2.0.CO;2, 2004.
D'Andrea, F., Gentine, P., Betts, A. K., and Lintner, B. R.: Triggering Deep
Convection with a Probabilistic Plume Model, J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 3881–3901,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-0340.1, 2014.
Davies, L., Plant, R. S., and Derbyshire, S. H.: A simple model of
convection with memory, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D17202,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011653, 2009.
Davies, L., Jakob, C., Cheung, K., Genio, A. D., Hill, A., Hume, T., Keane,
R. J., Komori, T., Larson, V. E., Lin, Y., Liu, X., Nielsen, B. J., Petch,
J., Plant, R. S., Singh, M. S., Shi, X., Song, X., Wang, W., Whitall, M. A.,
Wolf, A., Xie, S., and Zhang, G.: A single-column model ensemble approach
applied to the TWP-ICE experiment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 6544–6563,
https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50450, 2013a.
Davies, L., Plant, R. S., and Derbyshire, S. H.: Departures from convective
equilibrium with a rapidly varying surface forcing, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,
139, 1731–1746, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2065, 2013b.
Dawe, J. T. and Austin, P. H.: Direct entrainment and detrainment rate distributions of individual shallow cumulus clouds in an LES, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 7795–7811, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7795-2013, 2013.
Deardorff, J. W.: The Counter-Gradient Heat Flux in the Lower Atmosphere and
in the Laboratory, J. Atmos. Sci., 23, 503–506,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1966)023<0503:TCGHFI>2.0.CO;2, 1966.
Deardorff, J. W., Willis, G. E., and Lilly, D. K.: Laboratory investigation
of non-steady penetrative convection, J. Fliud Mech., 35, 7–31,
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112069000942, 1969.
Deguines, N., Brashares, J. S., and Prugh, L. R.: Precipitation alters
interactions in a grassland ecological community, J. Anim. Ecol., 86,
262–272, https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12614, 2017.
Del Genio, A. D. and Wu, J.: The Role of Entrainment in the Diurnal Cycle of
Continental Convection, J. Climate, 23, 2722–2738,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI3340.1, 2010.
Del Genio, A. D., Chen, Y., Kim, D., and Yao, M.-S.: The MJO Transition from
Shallow to Deep Convection in CloudSat/CALIPSO Data and GISS GCM
Simulations, J. Climate, 25, 3755–3770,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00384.1, 2012.
Del Genio, A. D., Wu, J., Wolf, A. B., Chen, Y., Yao, M.-S., and Kim, D.:
Constraints on Cumulus Parameterization from Simulations of Observed MJO
Events, J. Climate, 28, 6419–6442,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00832.1, 2015.
DeMott, C. A., Randall, D. A., and Khairoutdinov, M.: Convective
Precipitation Variability as a Tool for General Circulation Model Analysis,
J. Climate, 20, 91–112, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3991.1, 2007.
Deng, A., Seaman, N. L., and Kain, J. S.: A Shallow-Convection Parameterization for Mesoscale Models. Part I: Submodel Description
and Preliminary Applications, J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 34–56, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060<0034:ASCPFM>2.0.CO;2, 2003.
Deng, Q., Khouider, B., and Majda, A. J.: The MJO in a Coarse-Resolution GCM
with a Stochastic Multicloud Parameterization, J. Atmos. Sci., 72, 55–74,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-14-0120.1, 2015.
Derbyshire, S. H., Maidens, A. V., Milton, S. F., Stratton, R. A., and
Willett, M. R.: Adaptive detrainment in a convective parametrization, Q. J.
Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 1856–1871, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.875, 2011.
de Roode, S. R., Siebesma, A. P., Jonker, H. J. J., and de Voogd, Y.:
Parameterization of the Vertical Velocity Equation for Shallow Cumulus
Clouds, Mon. Weather Rev., 140, 2424–2436,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00277.1, 2012.
De Rooy, W. C. and Siebesma, A. P.: A Simple Parameterization for
Detrainment in Shallow Cumulus, Mon. Weather Rev., 136, 560–576,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2007MWR2201.1, 2008.
De Rooy, W. C. and Siebesma, A. P.: Analytical expressions for entrainment
and detrainment in cumulus convection, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 136,
1216–1227, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.640, 2010.
De Rooy, W. C., Bechtold, P., Fröhlich, K., Hohenegger, C., Jonker, H.,
Mironov, D., Siebesma, A. P., Teixeira, J., and Yano, J.-I.: Entrainment and
detrainment in cumulus convection: an overview, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,
139, 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.1959, 2013.
Donner, L. J.: A Cumulus Parameterization Including Mass Fluxes, Vertical
Momentum Dynamics, and Mesoscale Effects, J. Climate, 50, 889–906,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1993)050<0889:ACPIMF>2.0.CO;2, 1993.
Donner, L. J. and Phillips, V. T.: Boundary layer control on convective
available potential energy: Implications for cumulus parameterization, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4701, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003773, 2003.
Donner, L. J., Seman, C. J., Hemler, R. S., and Fan, S.: A Cumulus
Parameterization Including Mass Fluxes, Convective Vertical Velocities, and
Mesoscale Effects: Thermodynamic and Hydrological Aspects in a General
Circulation Model, J. Atmos. Sci., 14, 3444–3463,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<3444:ACPIMF>2.0.CO;2, 2001.
Donner, L. J., Wyman, B. L., Hemler, R. S., Horowitz, L. W., Ming, Y., Zhao,
M., Golaz, J.-C., Ginoux, P., Lin, S.-J., Schwarzkopf, M. D., Austin, J.,
Alaka, G., Cooke, W. F., Delworth, T. L., Freidenreich, S. M., Gordon, C.
T., Griffies, S. M., Held, I. M., Hurlin, W. J., Klein, S. A., Knutson, T.
R., Langenhorst, A. R., Lee, H.-C., Lin, Y., Magi, B. I., Malyshev, S. L.,
Milly, P. C. D., Naik, V., Nath, M. J., Pincus, R., Ploshay, J. J.,
Ramaswamy, V., Seman, C. J., Shevliakova, E., Sirutis, J. J., Stern, W. F.,
Stouffer, R. J., Wilson, R. J., Winton, M., Wittenberg, A. T., and Zeng, F.:
The Dynamical Core, Physical Parameterizations, and Basic Simulation
Characteristics of the Atmospheric Component AM3 of the GFDL Global Coupled
Model CM3, J. Climate, 24, 3484–3519,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JCLI3955.1, 2011.
Donner, L. J., O'Brien, T. A., Rieger, D., Vogel, B., and Cooke, W. F.: Are atmospheric updrafts a key to unlocking climate forcing and sensitivity?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 12983–12992, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12983-2016, 2016.
Dore, M. H. I.: Climate change and changes in global precipitation patterns:
What do we know?, Environ. Int., 31, 1167–1181,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2005.03.004, 2005.
Dorrestijn, J., Crommelin, D. T., Biello, J. A., and Böing, S. J.: A
data-driven multi-cloud model for stochastic parametrization of deep
convection, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A., 371, 20120374,
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0374, 2013a.
Dorrestijn, J., Crommelin, D. T., Siebesma, A. Pier., and Jonker, H. J. J.:
Stochastic parameterization of shallow cumulus convection estimated from
high-resolution model data, Theor. Comp. Fluid Dyn., 27, 133–148,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00162-012-0281-y, 2013b.
Dorrestijn, J., Crommelin, D. T., Siebesma, A. P., Jonker, H. J. J., and
Jakob, C.: Stochastic Parameterization of Convective Area Fractions with a
Multicloud Model Inferred from Observational Data, J. Atmos. Sci., 72,
854–869, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-14-0110.1, 2015.
Drueke, S., Kirshbaum, D. J., and Kollias, P.: Evaluation of Shallow-Cumulus
Entrainment Rate Retrievals Using Large-Eddy Simulation, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 124, 9624–9643, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030889, 2019.
Easterling, D. R., Meehl, G. A., Parmesan, C., Changnon, S. A., Karl, T. R.,
and Mearns, L. O.: Climate Extremes: Observations, Modeling, and Impacts,
Science, 289, 2068–2074, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5487.2068,
2000.
Emanuel, K.: Atmospheric convection, Oxford University Press, 592 pp., ISBN 0-19-506630-8, 1994.
Emanuel, K. and Raymond, D. J. (Eds.): The Representation of Cumulus Convection in Numerical Models of the Atmosphere, American Meteorological Society, 246 pp., https://doi.org/10.1175/0065-9401-24.46.1, 1993.
Emanuel, K. A.: The Finite-Amplitude Nature of Tropical Cyclogenesis, J.
Atmos. Sci., 46, 3431–3456,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1989)046<3431:TFANOT>2.0.CO;2, 1989.
Emanuel, K. A.: A Scheme for Representing Cumulus Convection in Large-Scale
Models, J. Atmos. Sci., 48, 2313–2329,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1991)048<2313:ASFRCC>2.0.CO;2, 1991.
Emanuel, K. A.: The Behavior of a Simple Hurricane Model Using a Convective
Scheme Based on Subcloud-Layer Entropy Equilibrium, J. Atmos. Sci., 52,
3960–3968, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1995)052<3960:TBOASH>2.0.CO;2, 1995.
Emanuel, K. A. and Živković-Rothman, M.: Development and Evaluation
of a Convection Scheme for Use in Climate Models, J. Atmos. Sci., 56,
1766–1782, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<1766:DAEOAC>2.0.CO;2, 1999.
Evans, J. P. and Westra, S.: Investigating the Mechanisms of Diurnal
Rainfall Variability Using a Regional Climate Model, J. Climate, 25,
7232–7247, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00616.1, 2012.
Evans, J. P., Ekström, M., and Ji, F.: Evaluating the performance of a
WRF physics ensemble over South-East Australia, Clim. Dynam., 39,
1241–1258, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-011-1244-5, 2012.
Feingold, G.: Modeling of the first indirect effect: Analysis of measurement
requirements, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 19, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017967,
2003.
Feingold, G. and Koren, I.: A model of coupled oscillators applied to the aerosol–cloud–precipitation system, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 20, 1011–1021, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-20-1011-2013, 2013.
Fiori, E., Comellas, A., Molini, L., Rebora, N., Siccardi, F., Gochis, D.
J., Tanelli, S., and Parodi, A.: Analysis and hindcast simulations of an
extreme rainfall event in the Mediterranean area: The Genoa 2011 case,
Atmos. Res., 138, 13–29, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.10.007,
2014.
Fletcher, J. K. and Bretherton, C. S.: Evaluating Boundary Layer–Based Mass
Flux Closures Using Cloud-Resolving Model Simulations of Deep Convection, J.
Atmos. Sci., 67, 2212–2225, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAS3328.1, 2010.
Folkins, I., Mitovski, T., and Pierce, J. R.: A simple way to improve the
diurnal cycle in convective rainfall over land in climate models, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 2113–2130, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020149,
2014.
Fonseca, R. M., Zhang, T., and Yong, K.-T.: Improved simulation of precipitation in the tropics using a modified BMJ scheme in the WRF model, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2915–2928, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2915-2015, 2015.
Freitas, S. R., Panetta, J., Longo, K. M., Rodrigues, L. F., Moreira, D. S., Rosário, N. E., Silva Dias, P. L., Silva Dias, M. A. F., Souza, E. P., Freitas, E. D., Longo, M., Frassoni, A., Fazenda, A. L., Santos e Silva, C. M., Pavani, C. A. B., Eiras, D., França, D. A., Massaru, D., Silva, F. B., Santos, F. C., Pereira, G., Camponogara, G., Ferrada, G. A., Campos Velho, H. F., Menezes, I., Freire, J. L., Alonso, M. F., Gácita, M. S., Zarzur, M., Fonseca, R. M., Lima, R. S., Siqueira, R. A., Braz, R., Tomita, S., Oliveira, V., and Martins, L. D.: The Brazilian developments on the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (BRAMS 5.2): an integrated environmental model tuned for tropical areas, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 189–222, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-189-2017, 2017.
Freitas, S. R., Grell, G. A., Molod, A., Thompson, M. A., Putman, W. M.,
Silva, C. M. S. e, and Souza, E. P.: Assessing the Grell-Freitas Convection
Parameterization in the NASA GEOS Modeling System, J. Adv. Model Earth Sy.,
10, 1266–1289, https://doi.org/10.1029/2017MS001251, 2018.
Freitas, S. R., Grell, G. A., and Li, H.: The Grell–Freitas (GF) convection parameterization: recent developments, extensions, and applications, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5393–5411, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5393-2021, 2021.
Frenkel, Y., Majda, A. J., and Khouider, B.: Using the Stochastic Multicloud
Model to Improve Tropical Convective Parameterization: A Paradigm Example,
J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 1080–1105, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-0148.1,
2012.
Fritsch, J. M. and Chappell, C. F.: Numerical Prediction of Convectively
Driven Mesoscale Pressure Systems. Part I: Convective Parameterization, J.
Atmos. Sci., 37, 1722–1733,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1980)037<1722:NPOCDM>2.0.CO;2, 1980.
Gallus, W. and Segal, M.: Impact of improved initialization of mesoscale
features on convective system rainfall in 10-km Eta simulations, Weather
Forecast., 16, 680–696, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(2001)016<0680:IOIIOM>2.0.CO;2, 2001.
Gao, S., Lu, C., Liu, Y., Mei, F., Wang, J., Zhu, L., and Yan, S.:
Contrasting Scale Dependence of Entrainment-Mixing Mechanisms in
Stratocumulus Clouds, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL086970,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL086970, 2020.
Gao, X.-J., Shi, Y., and Giorgi, F.: Comparison of convective
parameterizations in RegCM4 experiments over China with CLM as the land
surface model, Atmos. Ocean. Sc. Lett., 9, 246–254,
https://doi.org/10.1080/16742834.2016.1172938, 2016.
Gao, Y., Leung, L. R., Zhao, C., and Hagos, S.: Sensitivity of U.S. summer
precipitation to model resolution and convective parameterizations across
gray zone resolutions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 2714–2733,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025896, 2017.
García-Morales, M. B. and Dubus, L.: Forecasting precipitation for
hydroelectric power management: how to exploit GCM's seasonal ensemble
forecasts, Int. J. Climatol., 27, 1691–1705,
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1608, 2007.
García-Ortega, E., Lorenzana, J., Merino, A.,
Fernández-González, S., López, L., and Sánchez, J. L.:
Performance of multi-physics ensembles in convective precipitation events
over northeastern Spain, Atmos. Res., 190, 55–67,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.02.009, 2017.
Gebhardt, C., Theis, S. E., Paulat, M., and Ben Bouallègue, Z.:
Uncertainties in COSMO-DE precipitation forecasts introduced by model
perturbations and variation of lateral boundaries, Atmos. Res., 100,
168–177, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.12.008, 2011.
Geerts, B., Parsons, D., Ziegler, C. L., Weckwerth, T. M., Biggerstaff, M.
I., Clark, R. D., Coniglio, M. C., Demoz, B. B., Ferrare, R. A., Gallus, W.
A., Haghi, K., Hanesiak, J. M., Klein, P. M., Knupp, K. R., Kosiba, K.,
McFarquhar, G. M., Moore, J. A., Nehrir, A. R., Parker, M. D., Pinto, J. O.,
Rauber, R. M., Schumacher, R. S., Turner, D. D., Wang, Q., Wang, X., Wang,
Z., and Wurman, J.: The 2015 Plains Elevated Convection at Night Field
Project, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98, 767–786,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00257.1, 2017.
Geleyn, J.-F.: On a Simple, Parameter-Free Partition between Moistening and
Precipitation in the Kuo Scheme, Mon. Weather Rev., 113, 405–407,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1985)113<0405:OASPFP>2.0.CO;2, 1985.
Genio, A. D. D., Kovari, W., Yao, M.-S., and Jonas, J.: Cumulus Microphysics
and Climate Sensitivity, J. Climate, 18, 2376–2387,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3413.1, 2005.
Gentine, P., Betts, A. K., Lintner, B. R., Findell, K. L., van Heerwaarden, C.
C., Tzella, A., and D'Andrea, F.: A Probabilistic Bulk Model of Coupled
Mixed Layer and Convection. Part I: Clear-Sky Case, J. Atmos. Sci., 70,
1543–1556, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0145.1, 2013a.
Gentine, P., Betts, A. K., Lintner, B. R., Findell, K. L., van Heerwaarden, C.
C., and D'Andrea, F.: A Probabilistic Bulk Model of Coupled Mixed Layer
and Convection. Part II: Shallow Convection Case, J. Atmos., Sci., 70,
1557–1576, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0146.1, 2013b.
Gentine, P., Pritchard, M., Rasp, S., Reinaudi, G., and Yacalis, G.: Could Machine Learning Break the Convection Parameterization Deadlock?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 5742–5751, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL078202, 2018.
Gerard, L.: An integrated package for subgrid convection, clouds and
precipitation compatible with meso-gamma scales, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,
133, 711–730, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.58, 2007.
Gerard, L.: Bulk mass-flux perturbation formulation for a unified approach of deep convection at high resolution, Mon. Weather Rev., 143, 4038–4063, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0030.1, 2015.
Gerard, L. and Geleyn, J.-F.: Evolution of a subgrid deep convection
parametrization in a limited-area model with increasing resolution, Q. J.
Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 2293–2312, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.72, 2005.
Gerard, L., Brown, A. R., Cederwall, R. T., Chlond, A., Duynkerke, P. G., Golaz, J.-C., Khairoutdinov, M., Lewellen, D. C., Lock, A. P., MacVean, M. K., Moeng, C.-H., Neggers, R. a. J., Siebesma, A. P., and Stevens, B.: Large-eddy simulation of the diurnal cycle of shallow cumulus convection over land, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 128, 1075–1093, https://doi.org/10.1256/003590002320373210, 2002.
Gerard, L., Piriou, J.-M., Brožková, R., Geleyn, J.-F., and Banciu,
D.: Cloud and Precipitation Parameterization in a Meso-Gamma-Scale
Operational Weather Prediction Model, Mon. Weather Rev., 137, 3960–3977,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2009MWR2750.1, 2009.
Gillespie, D. T.: An Exact Method for Numerically Simulating the Stochastic
Coalescence Process in a Cloud, J. Atmos. Sci., 32, 1977–1989,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1975)032<1977:AEMFNS>2.0.CO;2, 1975.
Gillespie, D. T.: Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions,
J. Phys. Chem., 81, 2340–2361, https://doi.org/10.1021/j100540a008, 1977.
Giorgi, F. and Lionello, P.: Climate change projections for the
Mediterranean region, Global Planet.Change, 63, 90–104,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2007.09.005, 2008.
Golaz, J.-C., Larson, V. E., and Cotton, W. R.: A PDF-Based Model for
Boundary Layer Clouds. Part I: Method and Model Description, J. Atmos. Sci.,
59, 3540–3551, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<3540:APBMFB>2.0.CO;2, 2002a.
Golaz, J.-C., Larson, V. E., and Cotton, W. R.: A PDF-Based Model for
Boundary Layer Clouds. Part II: Model Results, J. Atmos. Sci., 59,
3552–3571, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<3552:APBMFB>2.0.CO;2, 2002b.
Gottwald, G. A., Peters, K., and Davies, L.: A data-driven method for the
stochastic parametrisation of subgrid-scale tropical convective area
fraction, J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 349–359,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2655, 2016.
Grabowski, W. W.: Coupling Cloud Processes with the Large-Scale Dynamics
Using the Cloud-Resolving Convection Parameterization (CRCP), J. Atmos.
Sci., 58, 978–997, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058<0978:CCPWTL>2.0.CO;2, 2001.
Grabowski, W. W.: Untangling Microphysical Impacts on Deep Convection Applying a Novel Modeling Methodology, J. Atmos. Sci., 72, 2446–2464, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-14-0307.1, 2015.
Grabowski, W. W.: Towards Global Large Eddy Simulation:
Super-Parameterization Revisited, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 94, 327–344,
https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2016-017, 2016.
Grabowski, W. W.: Can the Impact of Aerosols on Deep Convection be Isolated from Meteorological Effects in Atmospheric Observations?, J. Atmos. Sci., 75, 3347–3363, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0105.1, 2018.
Grabowski, W. W. and Pawlowska, H.: Entrainment and Mixing in Clouds: The
Paluch Mixing Diagram Revisited, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 32, 1767–1773,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1993)032<1767:EAMICT>2.0.CO;2, 1993.
Grabowski, W. W. and Smolarkiewicz, P. K.: CRCP: a Cloud Resolving
Convection Parameterization for modeling the tropical convecting atmosphere,
Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 133, 171–178,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2789(99)00104-9, 1999.
Grandpeix, J.-Y. and Lafore, J.-P.: A Density Current Parameterization
Coupled with Emanuel's Convection Scheme. Part I: The Models, J. Atmos.
Sci., 67, 881–897, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAS3044.1, 2010.
Grandpeix, J.-Y., Phillips, V., and Tailleux, R.: Improved mixing
representation in Emanuel's convection scheme, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 130,
3207–3222, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.03.144, 2004.
Grant, A. L. M.: Cloud-base fluxes in the cumulus-capped boundary layer, Q.
J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 127, 407–421, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712757209,
2001.
Grant, A. L. M. and Brown, A. R.: A similarity hypothesis for
shallow-cumulus transports, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125, 1913–1936,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712555802, 1999.
Grant, A. L. M. and Lock, A. P.: The turbulent kinetic energy budget for
shallow cumulus convection, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 130, 401–422,
https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.03.50, 2004.
Gray, M. E. B.: Characteristics of Numerically Simulated Mesoscale
Convective Systems and Their Application to Parameterization, J. Atmos.
Sci., 57, 3953–3970, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058<3953:CONSMC>2.0.CO;2, 2000.
Gregory, D.: Estimation of entrainment rate in simple models of convective
clouds, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 127, 53–72,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712757104, 2001.
Gregory, D. and Rowntree, P. R.: A Mass Flux Convection Scheme with
Representation of Cloud Ensemble Characteristics and Stability-Dependent
Closure, Mon. Weather Rev., 118, 1483–1506,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1990)118<1483:AMFCSW>2.0.CO;2, 1990.
Gregory, D., Morcrette, J.-J., Jakob, C., Beljaars, A. C. M., and Stockdale,
T.: Revision of convection, radiation and cloud schemes in the ECMWF
integrated forecasting system, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 126, 1685–1710,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712656607, 2000.
Grell, A. G., Dudhia, J., and Stauffer, D.: A description of the fifthgeneration Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5), University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, No. NCAR/TN-398+STR, https://doi.org/10.5065/D60Z716B, 1994.
Grell, G. A.: Prognostic Evaluation of Assumptions Used by Cumulus
Parameterizations, Mon. Weather Rev., 121, 764–787,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1993)121<0764:PEOAUB>2.0.CO;2, 1993.
Grell, G. A. and Dévényi, D.: A generalized approach to
parameterizing convection combining ensemble and data assimilation
techniques, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 38-1–38–4,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015311, 2002.
Grell, G. A. and Freitas, S. R.: A scale and aerosol aware stochastic convective parameterization for weather and air quality modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 5233–5250, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5233-2014, 2014.
Grell, G. A., Kuo, Y.-H., and Pasch, R. J.: Semiprognostic Tests of Cumulus
Parameterization Schemes in the Middle Latitudes, Mon. Weather Rev., 119,
5–31, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1991)119<0005:STOCPS>2.0.CO;2, 1991.
Grenier, H. and Bretherton, C. S.: A Moist PBL Parameterization for
Large-Scale Models and Its Application to Subtropical Cloud-Topped Marine
Boundary Layers, Mon. Weather Rev., 129, 357–377,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0357:AMPPFL>2.0.CO;2, 2001.
Groenemeijer, P. and Craig, G. C.: Ensemble forecasting with a stochastic convective parametrization based on equilibrium statistics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4555–4565, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4555-2012, 2012.
Guérémy, J. F.: A continuous buoyancy based convection scheme:
one-and three-dimensional validation, Tellus A, 63, 687–706,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0870.2011.00521.x, 2011.
Guichard, F., Petch, J. C., Redelsperger, J.-L., Bechtold, P., Chaboureau,
J.-P., Cheinet, S., Grabowski, W., Grenier, H., Jones, C. G., Köhler,
M., Piriou, J.-M., Tailleux, R., and Tomasini, M.: Modelling the diurnal
cycle of deep precipitating convection over land with cloud-resolving models
and single-column models, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 130, 3139–3172,
https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.03.145, 2004.
Guo, H., Golaz, J.-C., Donner, L. J., Ginoux, P., and Hemler, R. S.:
Multivariate Probability Density Functions with Dynamics in the GFDL
Atmospheric General Circulation Model: Global Tests, J. Climate, 27,
2087–2108, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00347.1, 2014.
Guo, H., Golaz, J.-C., Donner, L. J., Wyman, B., Zhao, M., and Ginoux, P.:
CLUBB as a unified cloud parameterization: Opportunities and challenges,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 4540–4547, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063672,
2015a.
Guo, X., Lu, C., Zhao, T., Zhang, G. J., and Liu, Y.: An Observational Study
of Entrainment Rate in Deep Convection, Atmosphere-Basel, 6, 1362–1376,
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos6091362, 2015b.
Gustafson, W. I., Vogelmann, A. M., Li, Z., Cheng, X., Dumas, K. K., Endo,
S., Johnson, K. L., Krishna, B., Fairless, T., and Xiao, H.: The Large-Eddy
Simulation (LES) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Symbiotic
Simulation and Observation (LASSO) Activity for Continental Shallow
Convection, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 101, E462–E479,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0065.1, 2020.
Hack, J. J.: Parameterization of moist convection in the National Center for
Atmospheric Research community climate model (CCM2), J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 99, 5551–5568, https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD03478, 1994.
Hack, J. J., Schubert, W. H., and Dias, P. L. S.: A Spectral Cumulus
Parameterization for Use in Numerical Models of the Tropical Atmosphere,
Mon. Weather Rev., 112, 704–716, 1984.
Hagos, S., Feng, Z., Plant, R. S., Houze, R. A., and Xiao, H.: A Stochastic
Framework for Modeling the Population Dynamics of Convective Clouds, J. Adv.
Model. Earth Sy., 10, 448–465, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS001214, 2018.
Han, J. and Bretherton, C. S.: TKE-Based Moist Eddy-Diffusivity Mass-Flux
(EDMF) Parameterization for Vertical Turbulent Mixing, Weather Forecast.,
34, 869–886, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-18-0146.1, 2019.
Han, J. and Pan, H.-L.: Revision of Convection and Vertical Diffusion
Schemes in the NCEP Global Forecast System, Weather Forecast., 26, 520–533,
https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-10-05038.1, 2011.
Han, J., Witek, M. L., Teixeira, J., Sun, R., Pan, H.-L., Fletcher, J. K.,
and Bretherton, C. S.: Implementation in the NCEP GFS of a Hybrid
Eddy-Diffusivity Mass-Flux (EDMF) Boundary Layer Parameterization with
Dissipative Heating and Modified Stable Boundary Layer Mixing, Weather
Forecast., 31, 341–352, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-15-0053.1, 2016a.
Han, J., Wang, W., Kwon, Y. C., Hong, S.-Y., Tallapragada, V., and Yang, F.:
Updates in the NCEP GFS Cumulus Convection Schemes with Scale and Aerosol
Awareness, Weather Forecast., 32, 2005–2017,
https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-17-0046.1, 2017.
Han, J.-Y., Hong, S.-Y., Lim, K.-S. S., and Han, J.: Sensitivity of a
Cumulus Parameterization Scheme to Precipitation Production Representation
and Its Impact on a Heavy Rain Event over Korea, Mon. Weather Rev., 144,
2125–2135, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0255.1, 2016b.
Han, J.-Y., Kim, S.-Y., Choi, I.-J., and Jin, E. K.: Effects of the
Convective Triggering Process in a Cumulus Parameterization Scheme on the
Diurnal Variation of Precipitation over East Asia, Atmosphere-Basel, 10, 28,
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10010028, 2019.
Han, J.-Y., Hong, S.-Y., and Kwon, Y. C.: The Performance of a Revised
Simplified Arakawa–Schubert (SAS) Convection Scheme in the Medium-Range
Forecasts of the Korean Integrated Model (KIM), Weather Forecast., 35,
1113–1128, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-19-0219.1, 2020.
Hannah, W. M. and Maloney, E. D.: The Role of Moisture–Convection Feedbacks
in Simulating the Madden–Julian Oscillation, J. Climate, 24, 2754–2770,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JCLI3803.1, 2011.
Hara, M., Yoshikane, T., Takahashi, H. G., Kimura, F., Noda, A., and
Tokioka, T.: Assessment of the Diurnal Cycle of Precipitation over the
Maritime Continent Simulated by a 20 km Mesh GCM Using TRMM PR Data, J.
Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 87A, 413–424, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.87A.413,
2009.
Hararuk, O., Xia, J., and Luo, Y.: Evaluation and improvement of a global
land model against soil carbon data using a Bayesian Markov chain Monte
Carlo method, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 119, 403–417,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JG002535, 2014.
Heus, T. and Jonker, H. J. J.: Subsiding Shells around Shallow Cumulus Clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 1003–1018, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAS2322.1, 2008.
Heus, T., van Dijk, G., Jonker, H. J. J., and Akker, H. E. A. V. den: Mixing
in Shallow Cumulus Clouds Studied by Lagrangian Particle Tracking, J. Atmos.
Sci., 65, 2581–2597, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAS2572.1, 2008.
Heymsfield, A. J., Schmitt, C., and Bansemer, A.: Ice Cloud Particle Size
Distributions and Pressure-Dependent Terminal Velocities from In Situ
Observations at Temperatures from 0∘ to −86 ∘C, J.
Atmos. Sci., 70, 4123–4154, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0124.1, 2013.
Hirons, L. C., Inness, P., Vitart, F., and Bechtold, P.: Understanding advances in the simulation of intraseasonal variability in the ECMWF model. Part I: The representation of the MJO, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 139675, 1417–1426, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2060, 2013.
Hirota, N., Takayabu, Y. N., Watanabe, M., Kimoto, M., and Chikira, M.: Role
of Convective Entrainment in Spatial Distributions of and Temporal
Variations in Precipitation over Tropical Oceans, J. Climate, 27,
8707–8723, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00701.1, 2014.
Hohenegger, C. and Bretherton, C. S.: Simulating deep convection with a shallow convection scheme, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 10389–10406, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10389-2011, 2011.
Holden, Z. A., Swanson, A., Luce, C. H., Jolly, W. M., Maneta, M., Oyler, J.
W., Warren, D. A., Parsons, R., and Affleck, D.: Decreasing fire season
precipitation increased recent western US forest wildfire activity, P. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA, 115, E8349–E8357, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1802316115,
2018.
Holloway, C. E., Woolnough, S. J., and Lister, G. M. S.: Precipitation
distributions for explicit versus parametrized convection in a large-domain
high-resolution tropical case study, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 138,
1692–1708, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.1903, 2012.
Holloway, C. E., Woolnough, S. J., and Lister, G. M. S.: The Effects of
Explicit versus Parameterized Convection on the MJO in a Large-Domain
High-Resolution Tropical Case Study. Part I: Characterization of Large-Scale
Organization and Propagation, J. ATmos. Sci., 70, 1342–1369,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0227.1, 2013.
Holtslag, A. A. M.: Modelling of atmospheric boundary layers, Royal
Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, 85, 110, 1998.
Hong, S.-Y. and Pan, H.-L.: Nonlocal Boundary Layer Vertical Diffusion in a
Medium-Range Forecast Model, Mon. Weather Rev., 124, 2322–2339,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1996)124<2322:NBLVDI>2.0.CO;2, 1996.
Hong, S.-Y. and Pan, H.-L.: Convective Trigger Function for a Mass-Flux
Cumulus Parameterization Scheme, Mon. Weather Rev., 126, 2599–2620,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126<2599:CTFFAM>2.0.CO;2, 1998.
Hong, S.-Y., Park, H., Cheong, H.-B., Kim, J.-E. E., Koo, M.-S., Jang, J.,
Ham, S., Hwang, S.-O., Park, B.-K., Chang, E.-C., and Li, H.: The
Global/Regional Integrated Model system (GRIMs), Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci.,
49, 219–243, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-013-0023-0, 2013.
Honnert, R., Efstathiou, G. A., Beare, R. J., Ito, J., Lock, A., Neggers,
R., Plant, R. S., Shin, H. H., Tomassini, L., and Zhou, B.: The Atmospheric
Boundary Layer and the “Gray Zone” of Turbulence: A Critical Review, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD030317,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030317, 2020.
Hou, A. Y., Kakar, R. K., Neeck, S., Azarbarzin, A. A., Kummerow, C. D.,
Kojima, M., Oki, R., Nakamura, K., and Iguchi, T.: The Global Precipitation
Measurement Mission, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 95, 701–722,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00164.1, 2014.
Houghton, H. G. and Cramer, H. E.: a Theory of Entrainment in Convective
Currents, J. Atmos. Sci., 8, 95–102,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1951)008<0095:ATOEIC>2.0.CO;2, 1951.
Hourdin, F., Couvreux, F., and Menut, L.: Parameterization of the Dry
Convective Boundary Layer Based on a Mass Flux Representation of Thermals,
J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 1105–1123,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<1105:POTDCB>2.0.CO;2, 2002.
Hourdin, F., Grandpeix, J.-Y., Rio, C., Bony, S., Jam, A., Cheruy, F.,
Rochetin, N., Fairhead, L., Idelkadi, A., Musat, I., Dufresne, J.-L.,
Lahellec, A., Lefebvre, M.-P., and Roehrig, R.: LMDZ5B: the atmospheric
component of the IPSL climate model with revisited parameterizations for
clouds and convection, Clim. Dynam., 40, 2193–2222,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1343-y, 2013.
Hourdin, F., Mauritsen, T., Gettelman, A., Golaz, J.-C., Balaji, V., Duan,
Q., Folini, D., Ji, D., Klocke, D., Qian, Y., Rauser, F., Rio, C.,
Tomassini, L., Watanabe, M., and Williamson, D.: The Art and Science of
Climate Model Tuning, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98, 589–602,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00135.1, 2017.
Huffman, G. J., Bolvin, D. T., Braithwaite, D., Hsu, K., Joyce, R.,
Kidd, C., Nelkin, E. J., and Xie, P.: NASA Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG), Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document (ATBD), 4, 26, 2015.
Huffman, G. J., Stocker, E. F., Bolvin, D. T., Nelkin, E. J., Tan, J.: GPM IMERG Final Precipitation L3 1 day 0.1 degree x 0.1 degree V06, edited by: Savtchenko, A., Greenbelt, MD, Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC) [data set], https://doi.org/10.5067/GPM/IMERGDF/DAY/06 (last access: 20 November 2020), 2019.
IPCC: Climate Change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups
I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change, 151, 2014.
Jackson, C., Sen, M. K., and Stoffa, P. L.: An Efficient Stochastic Bayesian
Approach to Optimal Parameter and Uncertainty Estimation for Climate Model
Predictions, J. Climate, 17, 2828–2841,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<2828:AESBAT>2.0.CO;2, 2004.
Jakob, C.: Accelerating progress in global atmospheric model development through improved parameterizations: Challenges, opportunities, and strategies, B. Am. Meterol. Soc., 91, 869–876, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2898.1, 2010.
Jackson, C. S., Sen, M. K., Huerta, G., Deng, Y., and Bowman, K. P.: Error
Reduction and Convergence in Climate Prediction, J. Climate, 21, 6698–6709,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2112.1, 2008.
Jakob, C. and Siebesma, A. P.: A New Subcloud Model for Mass-Flux Convection
Schemes: Influence on Triggering, Updraft Properties, and Model Climate,
Mon. Weather Rev., 131, 2765–2778,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2003)131<2765:ANSMFM>2.0.CO;2, 2003.
Jam, A., Hourdin, F., Rio, C., and Couvreux, F.: Resolved Versus
Parametrized Boundary-Layer Plumes. Part III: Derivation of a Statistical
Scheme for Cumulus Clouds, Boundary-Layer Meteorol, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol.,
147, 421–441, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-012-9789-3, 2013.
James, R. P. and Markowski, P. M.: A Numerical Investigation of the Effects
of Dry Air Aloft on Deep Convection, Mon. Weather Rev., 138, 140–161,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2009MWR3018.1, 2010.
Janjić, Z. I.: The Step-Mountain Eta Coordinate Model: Further
Developments of the Convection, Viscous Sublayer, and Turbulence Closure
Schemes, 122, 927–945, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1994)122<0927:TSMECM>2.0.CO;2, 1994.
Jankov, I. and Gallus, W. A.: Some contrasts between good and bad forecasts
of warm season MCS rainfall, Journal of Hydrology, Mon. Weather Rev., 288,
122–152, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.11.013, 2004.
Jankov, I., Gallus, W. A., Segal, M., Shaw, B., and Koch, S. E.: The Impact
of Different WRF Model Physical Parameterizations and Their Interactions on
Warm Season MCS Rainfall, Weather Forecast., 20, 1048–1060,
https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF888.1, 2005.
Jensen, J. B., Austin, P. H., Baker, M. B., and Blyth, A. M.: Turbulent
Mixing, Spectral Evolution and Dynamics in a Warm Cumulus Cloud, J. Atmos.
Sci., 42, 173–192, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1985)042<0173:TMSEAD>2.0.CO;2, 1985.
Jensen, M. P. and Del Genio, A. D.: Factors Limiting Convective Cloud-Top
Height at the ARM Nauru Island Climate Research Facility, J. Climate, 19,
2105–2117, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3722.1, 2006.
Jeyaratnam, J., Luo, Z. J., Giangrande, S. E., Wang, D., and Masunaga, H.: A
Satellite-Based Estimate of Convective Vertical Velocity and Convective Mass
Flux: Global Survey and Comparison With Radar Wind Profiler Observations,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2020GL090675,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090675, 2021.
Jiang, H., Feingold, G., and Sorooshian, A.: Effect of Aerosol on the
Susceptibility and Efficiency of Precipitation in Warm Trade Cumulus Clouds,
J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 3525–3540, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAS3484.1, 2010.
Johnson, R. H.: The Role of Convective-Scale Precipitation Downdrafts in
Cumulus and Synoptic-Scale Interactions, J. Atmos. Sci., 33, 1890–1910,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1976)033<1890:TROCSP>2.0.CO;2, 1976.
Johnson, R. H.: Diagnosis of Convective and Mesoscale Motions During Phase
IH of Gate, J. Atmos. Sci., 37, 733–753,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1980)037<0733:DOCAMM>2.0.CO;2, 1980.
Jonker, H. J. J., Verzijlbergh, R. A., Heus, T., and Siebesma, A. P.: The Influence of the Sub-Cloud Moisture Field on Cloud Size Distributions and the Consequences for Entrainment, Extended Abstracts, 17th Symp. on Boundary Layers and Turbulence, 23 May 2006, SanDiego, CA, 2006.
Joyce, R. J., Janowiak, J. E., Arkin, P. A., and Xie, P.: CMORPH:: A Method
that Produces Global Precipitation Estimates from Passive Microwave and
Infrared Data at High Spatial and Temporal Resolution, J. Hydrometeorol., 5,
487–503, 2004.
Jung, J.-H. and Arakawa, A.: Modeling the moist-convective atmosphere with a
Quasi-3-D Multiscale Modeling Framework (Q3D MMF), J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy.,
6, 185–205, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013MS000295, 2014.
Kain, J. S.: The Kain–Fritsch Convective Parameterization: An Update, J.
Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 43, 170–181,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2004)043<0170:TKCPAU>2.0.CO;2, 2004.
Kain, J. S. and Fritsch, J. M.: A One-Dimensional Entraining/Detraining
Plume Model and Its Application in Convective Parameterization, J. Atmos.
Sci., 47, 2784–2802, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1990)047<2784:AODEPM>2.0.CO;2, 1990.
Kain, J. S. and Fritsch, J. M.: The role of the convective “trigger
function” in numerical forecasts of mesoscale convective systems, Meteorol.
Atmos. Phys., 49, 93–106, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01025402, 1992.
Kain, J. S. and Fritsch, J. M.: Convective Parameterization for Mesoscale
Models: The Kain-Fritsch Scheme, in: The Representation of Cumulus
Convection in Numerical Models, Meteorological Monographs, American
Meteorological Society, 246 pp., https://doi.org/10.1175/0065-9401-24.46.1, 1993.
Kain, J. S., Weiss, S. J., Levit, J. J., Baldwin, M. E., and Bright, D. R.:
Examination of Convection-Allowing Configurations of the WRF Model for the
Prediction of Severe Convective Weather: The SPC/NSSL Spring Program 2004,
Weather Forecast., 21, 167–181, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF906.1, 2006.
Karlický, J., Huszár, P., Nováková, T., Belda, M., Švábik, F., Ďoubalová, J., and Halenka, T.: The “urban meteorology island”: a multi-model ensemble analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 15061–15077, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15061-2020, 2020.
Kawecki, S., Henebry, G. M., and Steiner, A. L.: Effects of Urban Plume Aerosols on a Mesoscale Convective System, J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 4641–4660, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0084.1, 2016.
Keane, R. J., Craig, G. C., Keil, C., and Zängl, G.: The Plant–Craig
Stochastic Convection Scheme in ICON and Its Scale Adaptivity, J. Atmos.
Sci., 71, 3404–3415, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-0331.1, 2014.
Kendon, E. J., Roberts, N. M., Senior, C. A., and Roberts, M. J.: Realism of
Rainfall in a Very High-Resolution Regional Climate Model, J. Climate, 25,
5791–5806, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00562.1, 2012.
Kessler, E.: On the Distribution and Continuity of Water Substance in
Atmospheric Circulations, in: On the Distribution and Continuity of Water
Substance in Atmospheric Circulations, Meteorological Monographs, vol. 10,
American Meteorological Society, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-935704-36-2_1, 1969.
Khain, A., Rosenfeld, D., and Pokrovsky, A.: Aerosol impact on the dynamics
and microphysics of deep convective clouds, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131,
2639–2663, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.62, 2005.
Khairoutdinov, M. and Randall, D.: High-Resolution Simulation of
Shallow-to-Deep Convection Transition over Land, J. Atmos. Sci., 63,
3421–3436, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3810.1, 2006.
Khairoutdinov, M., Randall, D., and DeMott, C.: Simulations of the
Atmospheric General Circulation Using a Cloud-Resolving Model as a
Superparameterization of Physical Processes, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 2136–2154,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3453.1, 2005.
Khairoutdinov, M. F. and Randall, D. A.: Cloud Resolving Modeling of the ARM
Summer 1997 IOP: Model Formulation, Results, Uncertainties, and
Sensitivities, J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 607–625,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060<0607:CRMOTA>2.0.CO;2, 2003.
Khouider, B.: A coarse grained stochastic multi-type particle interacting
model for tropical convection: Nearest neighbour interactions, Comm. Math.
Sci., 12, 1379–1407, https://doi.org/10.4310/CMS.2014.V12.N8.A1, 2014.
Khouider, B. and Majda, A.: Multicloud Models for Organized Tropical
Convection: Enhanced Congestus Heating, J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 895–914,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAS2408.1, 2008.
Khouider, B. and Majda, A. J.: A Simple Multicloud Parameterization for
Convectively Coupled Tropical Waves. Part I: Linear Analysis, J. Atmos.
Sci., 63, 1308–1323, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3677.1, 2006.
Khouider, B. and Moncrieff, M. W.: Organized Convection Parameterization for
the ITCZ, J. Atmos. Sci., 72, 3073–3096,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0006.1, 2015.
Khouider, B., Majda, A. J., and Katsoulakis, M. A.: Coarse-grained
stochastic models for tropical convection and climate, P. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA, 100, 11941–11946, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1634951100, 2003.
Khouider, B., Biello, J., and Majda, A. J.: A stochastic multicloud model
for tropical convection, Comm. Math. Sci., 8, 187–216, 2010.
Kim, D. and Kang, I.-S.: A bulk mass flux convection scheme for climate
model: description and moisture sensitivity, Clim. Dynam., 38, 411–429,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0972-2, 2012.
Kim, D., Sobel, A. H., Maloney, E. D., Frierson, D. M. W., and Kang, I.-S.:
A Systematic Relationship between Intraseasonal Variability and Mean State
Bias in AGCM Simulations, J. Climate, 24, 5506–5520,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JCLI4177.1, 2011.
Kim, D., Sobel, A. H., Del Genio, A. D., Chen, Y., Camargo, S. J., Yao,
M.-S., Kelley, M., and Nazarenko, L.: The Tropical Subseasonal Variability
Simulated in the NASA GISS General Circulation Model, J. Climate, 25,
4641–4659, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00447.1, 2012.
Kim, D., Del Genio, A. D., and Yao, M.-S.: Moist convection scheme in Model E2, arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.7496, 2013.
Kirshbaum, D. J. and Grant, A. L. M.: Invigoration of cumulus cloud fields
by mesoscale ascent, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 138, 2136–2150,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.1954, 2012.
Kirshbaum, D. J. and Lamer, K.: Climatological Sensitivities of
Shallow-Cumulus Bulk Entrainment in Continental and Oceanic Locations, J.
Atmos. Sci., 78, 2429–2443, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-20-0377.1, 2021.
Klein, S. A. and Hartmann, D. L.: The Seasonal Cycle of Low Stratiform
Clouds, J. Climate, 6, 1587–1606,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1993)006<1587:TSCOLS>2.0.CO;2, 1993.
Klingaman, N. P. and Woolnough, S. J.: Using a case-study approach to
improve the Madden–Julian oscillation in the Hadley Centre model, Q. J.
Roy. Meteor. Soc., 140, 2491–2505, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2314, 2014.
Klocke, D., Pincus, R., and Quaas, J.: On Constraining Estimates of Climate
Sensitivity with Present-Day Observations through Model Weighting, J.
Climate, 24, 6092–6099, https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JCLI4193.1, 2011.
Knievel, J. C., Ahijevych, D. A., and Manning, K. W.: Using Temporal Modes
of Rainfall to Evaluate the Performance of a Numerical Weather Prediction
Model, Mon. Weather Rev., 132, 2995–3009,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR2828.1, 2004.
Köhler, M.: Improved prediction of boundary layer clouds, ECMWF
Newsletter, 104, 18–22, 2005.
Köhler, M., Ahlgrimm, M., and Beljaars, A.: Unified treatment of dry
convective and stratocumulus-topped boundary layer in the ECMWF model, Q. J.
Roy. Meteor. Soc.,, 137, 43–57, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.713, 2011.
Kooperman, G. J., Pritchard, M. S., O'Brien, T. A., and Timmermans, B. W.:
Rainfall From Resolved Rather Than Parameterized Processes Better Represents
the Present-Day and Climate Change Response of Moderate Rates in the
Community Atmosphere Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 10, 971–988,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS001188, 2018.
Koren, I., Kaufman, Y. J., Rosenfeld, D., Remer, L. A., and Rudich, Y.:
Aerosol invigoration and restructuring of Atlantic convective clouds,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023187, 2005.
Kreitzberg, C. W. and Perkey, D. J.: Release of Potential Instability: Part
I. A Sequential Plume Model within a Hydrostatic Primitive Equation Model,
J. Atmos. Sci., 33, 456–475,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1976)033<0456:ROPIPI>2.0.CO;2, 1976.
Krishnamurthy, V. and Stan, C.: Simulation of the South American climate by
a coupled model with super-parameterized convection, Clim. Dynam., 44,
2369–2382, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2476-6, 2015.
Krishnamurti, T. N., Ramanathan, Y., Pan, H.-L., Pasch, R. J., and Molinari,
J.: Cumulus Parameterization and Rainfall Rates I, Mon. Weather Rev., 108,
465–472, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1980)108<0465:CPARRI>2.0.CO;2, 1980.
Krishnamurti, T. N., Low-Nam, S., and Pasch, R.: Cumulus Parameterization
and Rainfall Rates II, Mon. Weather Rev., 111, 815–828,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1983)111<0815:CPARRI>2.0.CO;2, 1983.
Krueger, S. K.: Numerical Simulation of Tropical Cumulus Clouds and Their
Interaction with the Subcloud Layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 45, 2221–2250,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1988)045<2221:NSOTCC>2.0.CO;2, 1988.
Kuang, Z.: Modeling the Interaction between Cumulus Convection and Linear
Gravity Waves Using a Limited-Domain Cloud System–Resolving Model, J.
Atmos. Sci., 65, 576–591, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAS2399.1, 2008.
Kuang, Z. and Bretherton, C. S.: A Mass-Flux Scheme View of a
High-Resolution Simulation of a Transition from Shallow to Deep Cumulus
Convection, J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 1895–1909,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3723.1, 2006.
Kucera, P. A., Ebert, E. E., Turk, F. J., Levizzani, V., Kirschbaum, D.,
Tapiador, F. J., Loew, A., and Borsche, M.: Precipitation from Space:
Advancing Earth System Science, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 94, 365–375,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00171.1, 2013.
Kuell, V., Gassmann, A., and Bott, A.: Towards a new hybrid cumulus
parametrization scheme for use in non-hydrostatic weather prediction models,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 133, 479–490, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.28, 2007.
Kumar, B., Götzfried, P., Suresh, N., Schumacher, J., and Shaw, R. A.:
Scale Dependence of Cloud Microphysical Response to Turbulent Entrainment
and Mixing, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy.,10, 2777–2785,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001487, 2018.
Kumar, D. and Dimri, A. P.: Sensitivity of convective and land surface
parameterization in the simulation of contrasting monsoons over CORDEX-South
Asia domain using RegCM-4.4.5.5, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 139, 297–322,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-019-02976-9, 2020.
Kummerow, C., Barnes, W., Kozu, T., Shiue, J., and Simpson, J.: The Tropical
Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Sensor Package, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech.,
15, 809–817, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1998)015<0809:TTRMMT>2.0.CO;2, 1998.
Kuo, H. L.: On the Controlling Influences of Eddy Diffusion on Thermal
Convection, J. Atmos. Sci., 19, 236–243,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1962)019<0236:OTCIOE>2.0.CO;2, 1962.
Kuo, H. L.: On Formation and Intensification of Tropical Cyclones Through
Latent Heat Release by Cumulus Convection, J. Atmos. Sci., 22, 40–63,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1965)022<0040:OFAIOT>2.0.CO;2, 1965.
Kuo, H. L.: Further Studies of the Parameterization of the Influence of
Cumulus Convection on Large-Scale Flow, J. Atmos. Sci., 31, 1232–1240,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1974)031<1232:FSOTPO>2.0.CO;2, 1974.
Kuo, Y.-H. and Anthes, R. A.: Semiprognostic Tests of Kuo–Type Cumulus
Parameterization Schemes in an Extratropical Convective System, Mon. Weather Rev., 112, 1498–1509, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1984)112<1498:STOKCP>2.0.CO;2, 1984.
Kurihara, Y.: A Scheme of Moist Convective Adjustment, Mon. Weather Rev., 101, 547–553, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1973)101<0547:ASOMCA>2.3.CO;2, 1973.
Kurowski, M. J., Thrastarson, H. T., Suselj, K., and Teixeira, J.: Towards unifying the planetary boundary layer and shallow convection in CAM5 with the eddy-diffusivity/mass-flux approach, Atmosphere-Basel, 10, 484, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10090484, 2019.
Kwon, Y. C. and Hong, S.-Y.: A Mass-Flux Cumulus Parameterization Scheme
across Gray-Zone Resolutions, Mon. Weather Rev., 145, 583–598,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0034.1, 2017.
Lamontagne, R. G. and Telford, J. W.: Cloud Top Mixing in Small Cumuli.,
Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, J. Atmos. Sci., 40, 2148–2156,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1983)040<2148:CTMISC>2.0.CO;2, 1983.
Lappen, C.-L. and Randall, D. A.: Toward a Unified Parameterization of the
Boundary Layer and Moist Convection. Part I: A New Type of Mass-Flux Model,
J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 2021–2036,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058<2021:TAUPOT>2.0.CO;2, 2001a.
Lappen, C.-L. and Randall, D. A.: Toward a Unified Parameterization of the
Boundary Layer and Moist Convection. Part II: Lateral Mass Exchanges and
Subplume-Scale Fluxes, J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 2037–2051,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058<2037:TAUPOT>2.0.CO;2, 2001b.
Larson, V. E.: CLUBB-SILHS: A parameterization of subgrid variability in the atmosphere, arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.03675, 2020.
Larson, V. E. and Schanen, D. P.: The Subgrid Importance Latin Hypercube Sampler (SILHS): a multivariate subcolumn generator, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 1813–1829, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1813-2013, 2013.
Larson, V. E., Golaz, J.-C., and Cotton, W. R.: Small-Scale and Mesoscale
Variability in Cloudy Boundary Layers: Joint Probability Density Functions,
J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 3519–3539,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<3519:SSAMVI>2.0.CO;2, 2002.
Larson, V. E., Golaz, J.-C., Jiang, H., and Cotton, W. R.: Supplying Local
Microphysics Parameterizations with Information about Subgrid Variability:
Latin Hypercube Sampling, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 4010–4026,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3624.1, 2005.
Larson, V. E., Schanen, D. P., Wang, M., Ovchinnikov, M., and Ghan, S.: PDF
Parameterization of Boundary Layer Clouds in Models with Horizontal Grid
Spacings from 2 to 16 km, Mon. Weather Rev., 140, 285–306,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-10-05059.1, 2012.
Le Trent, H. and Li, Z.-X.: Sensitivity of an atmospheric general
circulation model to prescribed SST changes: feedback effects associated
with the simulation of cloud optical properties, Clim. Dynam., 5, 175–187,
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00251808, 1991.
Leary, C. A. and Houze, R. A.: The Contribution of Mesoscale Motions to the
Mass and Heat Fluxes of an Intense Tropical Convective System, J. Atmos.
Sci., 37, 784–796, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1980)037<0784:TCOMMT>2.0.CO;2, 1980.
Lee, M.-I., Schubert, S. D., Suarez, M. J., Held, I. M., Lau, N.-C.,
Ploshay, J. J., Kumar, A., Kim, H.-K., and Schemm, J.-K. E.: An Analysis of
the Warm-Season Diurnal Cycle over the Continental United States and
Northern Mexico in General Circulation Models, J. Hydormeteorol., 8,
344–366, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM581.1, 2007a.
Lee, M.-I., Schubert, S. D., Suarez, M. J., Held, I. M., Kumar, A., Bell, T.
L., Schemm, J.-K. E., Lau, N.-C., Ploshay, J. J., Kim, H.-K., and Yoo,
S.-H.: Sensitivity to Horizontal Resolution in the AGCM Simulations of Warm
Season Diurnal Cycle of Precipitation over the United States and Northern
Mexico, J. Climate, 20, 1862–1881, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4090.1,
2007b.
Lee, M.-I., Schubert, S. D., Suarez, M. J., Schemm, J.-K. E., Pan, H.-L.,
Han, J., and Yoo, S.-H.: Role of convection triggers in the simulation of
the diurnal cycle of precipitation over the United States Great Plains in a
general circulation model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D02111,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008984, 2008.
Lee, Y. H., Park, S. K., and Chang, D.-E.: Parameter estimation using the genetic algorithm and its impact on quantitative precipitation forecast, Ann. Geophys., 24, 3185–3189, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-24-3185-2006, 2006.
LeMone, M. A. and Pennell, W. T.: The Relationship of Trade Wind Cumulus
Distribution to Subcloud Layer Fluxes and Structure, Mon. Weather Rev., 104,
524–539, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1976)104<0524:TROTWC>2.0.CO;2, 1976.
Levizzani, V. and Cattani, E.: Satellite Remote Sensing of Precipitation and
the Terrestrial Water Cycle in a Changing Climate, Remote Sens.-Basel, 11,
2301, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11192301, 2019.
Lewellen, W. S. and Yoh, S.: Binormal Model of Ensemble Partial Cloudiness,
J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 1228–1237,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1993)050<1228:BMOEPC>2.0.CO;2, 1993.
Li, L., Wang, B., Yuqing, W., and Hui, W.: Improvements in climate
simulation with modifications to the Tiedtke convective parameterization in
the grid-point atmospheric model of IAP LASG (GAMIL), Adv. Atmos. Sci., 24,
323–335, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-007-0323-3, 2007.
Li, S., Zhang, S., Liu, Z., Lu, L., Zhu, J., Zhang, X., Wu, X., Zhao, M.,
Vecchi, G. A., Zhang, R.-H., and Lin, X.: Estimating Convection Parameters
in the GFDL CM2.1 Model Using Ensemble Data Assimilation, J. Adv. Model.
Earth Sy., 10, 989–1010, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS001222, 2018.
Liang, F., Cheng, Y., and Lin, G.: Simulated Stochastic Approximation
Annealing for Global Optimization With a Square-Root Cooling Schedule, J.
Am. Stat. Assoc., 109, 847–863, https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2013.872993,
2014.
Lim, K.-S. S., Hong, S.-Y., Yoon, J.-H., and Han, J.: Simulation of the
Summer Monsoon Rainfall over East Asia Using the NCEP GFS Cumulus
Parameterization at Different Horizontal Resolutions, Weather Forecast., 29,
1143–1154, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-13-00143.1, 2014.
Lin, J. W.-B. and Neelin, J. D.: Influence of a stochastic moist convective
parameterization on tropical climate variability, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27,
3691–3694, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL011964, 2000.
Lin, J. W.-B. and Neelin, J. D.: Considerations for Stochastic Convective
Parameterization, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 959–975,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<0959:CFSCP>2.0.CO;2, 2002.
Lin, J. W.-B. and Neelin, J. D.: Toward stochastic deep convective
parameterization in general circulation models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1162,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016203, 2003.
Lin, J.-L., Kiladis, G. N., Mapes, B. E., Weickmann, K. M., Sperber, K. R.,
Lin, W., Wheeler, M. C., Schubert, S. D., Genio, A. D., Donner, L. J.,
Emori, S., Gueremy, J.-F., Hourdin, F., Rasch, P. J., Roeckner, E., and
Scinocca, J. F.: Tropical Intraseasonal Variability in 14 IPCC AR4 Climate
Models. Part I: Convective Signals, J. Climate, 19, 2665–2690,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3735.1, 2006.
Lin, J.-L., Lee, M.-I., Kim, D., Kang, I.-S., and Frierson, D. M. W.: The
Impacts of Convective Parameterization and Moisture Triggering on
AGCM-Simulated Convectively Coupled Equatorial Waves, J. Climate, 21,
883–909, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI1790.1, 2008.
Lin, J.-L., Qian, T., Shinoda, T., and Li, S.: Is the Tropical Atmosphere in
Convective Quasi-Equilibrium?, J. Climate, 28, 4357–4372,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00681.1, 2015.
Lindzen, R. S.: Some remarks on cumulus parameterization, Pure Appl.
Geophys., 126, 123–135, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00876918, 1988.
Lindzen, R. S., Chou, M.-D., and Hou, A. Y.: Does the Earth Have an Adaptive
Infrared Iris?, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 82, 417–432,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082<0417:DTEHAA>2.3.CO;2, 2001.
Liu, C., Fedorovich, E., Huang, J., Hu, X.-M., Wang, Y., and Lee, X.: Impact
of Aerosol Shortwave Radiative Heating on Entrainment in the Atmospheric
Convective Boundary Layer: A Large-Eddy Simulation Study, J. Atmos. Sci.,
76, 785–799, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0107.1, 2019.
Lohmann, U.: Global anthropogenic aerosol effects on convective clouds in ECHAM5-HAM, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2115–2131, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2115-2008, 2008.
Lord, S. J., Chao, W. C., and Arakawa, A.: Interaction of a Cumulus Cloud
Ensemble with the Large-Scale Environment. Part IV: The Discrete Model, J.
Atmos. Sci., 39, 104–113,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1982)039<0104:IOACCE>2.0.CO;2, 1982.
Loriaux, J. M., Lenderink, G., Roode, S. R. D., and Siebesma, A. P.:
Understanding Convective Extreme Precipitation Scaling Using Observations
and an Entraining Plume Model, J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 3641–3655,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0317.1, 2013.
Lotka, A. J.: Contribution to the Theory of Periodic Reactions, J. Phys.
Chem., 14, 271-274, https://doi.org/10.1021/j150111a004, 1910.
Lotka, A. J.: Analytical Note on Certain Rhythmic Relations in Organic
Systems, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 6, 410–415,
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.6.7.410, 1920.
Louis, J.-F.: A parametric model of vertical eddy fluxes in the atmosphere,
Bound.-Lay. Meteorol, 17, 187–202, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117978,
1979.
Lu, B. and Ren, H.-L.: Improving ENSO periodicity simulation by adjusting cumulus entrainment in BCC_CSMs, Dynam. Atmos. Oceans, 76, 127–140, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2016.10.005, 2016.
Lu, C., Liu, Y., and Niu, S.: Examination of turbulent entrainment-mixing
mechanisms using a combined approach, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D20207,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD015944, 2011.
Lu, C., Liu, Y., Yum, S. S., Niu, S., and Endo, S.: A new approach for
estimating entrainment rate in cumulus clouds, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L04802,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL050546, 2012.
Lu, C., Liu, Y., Niu, S., and Endo, S.: Scale dependence of
entrainment-mixing mechanisms in cumulus clouds, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
119, 13877–13890, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022265, 2014.
Lu, C., Sun, C., Liu, Y., Zhang, G. J., Lin, Y., Gao, W., Niu, S., Yin, Y.,
Qiu, Y., and Jin, L.: Observational Relationship Between Entrainment Rate
and Environmental Relative Humidity and Implications for Convection
Parameterization, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 13495–13504,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080264, 2018.
Luo, Z. J., Liu, G. Y., and Stephens, G. L.: Use of A-Train data to estimate
convective buoyancy and entrainment rate, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L09804,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL042904, 2010.
Ma, L.-M. and Tan, Z.-M.: Improving the behavior of the cumulus
parameterization for tropical cyclone prediction: Convection trigger,
Atmospheric Research, Atmos. Res., 92, 190–211,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2008.09.022, 2009.
Mahoney, K. M.: The representation of cumulus convection in high-resolution simulations of the 2013 Colorado Front Range flood, Mon. Weather Rev., 144, 4265–4278, 2016.
Majda, A. J. and Khouider, B.: Stochastic and mesoscopic models for tropical
convection, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 1123–1128,
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.032663199, 2002.
Majda, A. J., Timofeyev, I., and Eijnden, E. V.: Models for stochastic climate prediction, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96, 14687–14691, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.26.14687, 1999.
Majda, A. J., Timofeyev, I., and Eijnden, E. V.: A mathematical framework for stochastic climate models, Commun. Pur. Appl. Math., 54, 891–974, https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.1014, 2001.
Majda, A. J., Timofeyev, I., and Vanden-Eijnden, E.: Systematic Strategies for Stochastic Mode Reduction in Climate, J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 1705–1722, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060<1705:SSFSMR>2.0.CO;2, 2003.
Malinowski, S. P. and Pawlowska-Mankiewicz, H.: On Estimating the
Entraininent Level in Cumulus Clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 46, 2463–2465,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1989)046<2463:OETELI>2.0.CO;2, 1989.
Malkus, J. S.: Recent developments in studies of penetrative convection and an application to hurricane cumulonimbus towers, Cumulus Dynamics: Proceedings First Conference on Cumulus Convection, 19–22 May 1959, Portsmouth, N.H., edited by: Anderson, C. E., Pergamon Press, London, New York, 65–84, 1960.
Manabe, S., Smagorinsky, J., and Strickler, R. F.: Simulated Climatology of a General Circulation Model with Hydrologic Cycle, Mon. Weather Rev., 93, 769–798, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1965)093<0769:SCOAGC>2.3.CO;2, 1965.
Mapes, B. and Neale, R.: Parameterizing Convective Organization to Escape
the Entrainment Dilemma, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 3, M06004,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011MS000042, 2011.
Mapes, B. E.: Equilibrium Vs. Activation Control of Large-Scale Variations
of Tropical Deep Convection, in: The Physics and Parameterization of Moist
Atmospheric Convection, edited by: Smith, R. K., Springer Netherlands,
Dordrecht, 321–358,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8828-7_13, 1997.
Mapes, B. E.: Convective Inhibition, Subgrid-Scale Triggering Energy, and
Stratiform Instability in a Toy Tropical Wave Model, J. Atmos. Sci., 57,
1515–1535, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<1515:CISSTE>2.0.CO;2, 2000.
Mauritsen, T., Stevens, B., Roeckner, E., Crueger, T., Esch, M., Giorgetta,
M., Haak, H., Jungclaus, J., Klocke, D., Matei, D., Mikolajewicz, U., Notz,
D., Pincus, R., Schmidt, H., and Tomassini, L.: Tuning the climate of a
global model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 4, M00A01,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2012MS000154, 2012.
Mbienda, A. J. K., Tchawoua, C., Vondou, D. A., Choumbou, P., Sadem, C. K.,
and Dey, S.: Sensitivity experiments of RegCM4 simulations to different
convective schemes over Central Africa, Int. J. Climatol., 37, 328–342,
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4707, 2017.
McCaa, J. R. and Bretherton, C. S.: A New Parameterization for Shallow
Cumulus Convection and Its Application to Marine Subtropical Cloud-Topped
Boundary Layers. Part II: Regional Simulations of Marine Boundary Layer
Clouds, Mon. Weather Rev., 132, 883–896,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<0883:ANPFSC>2.0.CO;2, 2004.
McFarlane, N.: Parameterizations: representing key processes in climate
models without resolving them, WIRES CLim. Change, 2, 482–497,
https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.122, 2011.
McFiggans, G., Artaxo, P., Baltensperger, U., Coe, H., Facchini, M. C., Feingold, G., Fuzzi, S., Gysel, M., Laaksonen, A., Lohmann, U., Mentel, T. F., Murphy, D. M., O'Dowd, C. D., Snider, J. R., and Weingartner, E.: The effect of physical and chemical aerosol properties on warm cloud droplet activation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 2593–2649, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-2593-2006, 2006.
McGranahan, G., Balk, D., and Anderson, B.: The rising tide: assessing the
risks of climate change and human settlements in low elevation coastal
zones, Environ. Urban., 19, 17–37,
https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247807076960, 2007.
McLaughlin, J. F., Hellmann, J. J., Boggs, C. L., and Ehrlich, P. R.:
Climate change hastens population extinctions, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 99,
6070–6074, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.052131199, 2002.
Mellor, G. L.: The Gaussian Cloud Model Relations, J. Atmos. Sci., 34,
356–358, https://doi.org/10.1175/15200469(1977)034<0356:TGCMR> 2.0.CO;2, 1977.
Mironov, D. V.: Turbulence in the Lower Troposphere: Second-Order Closure and Mass–Flux Modelling Frameworks, in Interdisciplinary Aspects of Turbulence, Lect. Notes Phys., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 161–221, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78961-1_5, 2009.
Miyakoda, K., Smagorinsky, J., Strickler, R. F., and Hembree, G. D.: Experimental predictions with a nine-level hemispheric model, Mon. Weather Rev., 97, 1–76, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1969)097<0001:EEPWAN>2.3.CO;2, 1969.
Möbis, B. and Stevens, B.: Factors controlling the position of the
Intertropical Convergence Zone on an aquaplanet, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 4, M00A04,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2012MS000199, 2012.
Mohandas, S. and Ashrit, R.: Sensitivity of different convective
parameterization schemes on tropical cyclone prediction using a mesoscale
model, Nat. Hazards, 73, 213–235,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0824-6, 2014.
Molinari, J.: A General Form of Kuo's Cumulus Parameterization, Mon. Weather Rev., 113, 1411–1416, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1985)113<1411:AGFOKC>2.0.CO;2, 1985.
Molinari, J. and Corsetti, T.: Incorporation of Cloud-Scale and Mesoscale
Downdrafts into a Cumulus Parameterization: Results of One- and
Three-Dimensional Integrations, Mon. Weather Rev., 113, 485–501,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1985)113<0485:IOCSAM>2.0.CO;2, 1985.
Moncrieff, M. W. and Liu, C.: Representing convective organization in
prediction models by a hybrid strategy, J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 3404–3420,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3812.1, 2006.
Moncrieff, M. W., Liu, C., and Bogenschutz, P.: Simulation, Modeling, and
Dynamically Based Parameterization of Organized Tropical Convection for
Global Climate Models, J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 1363–1380,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0166.1, 2017.
Moorthi, S. and Suarez, M. J.: Relaxed Arakawa-Schubert. A Parameterization
of Moist Convection for General Circulation Models, Mon. Weather Rev., 120,
978–1002, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1992)120<0978:RASAPO>2.0.CO;2, 1992.
Morrison, H.: Impacts of updraft size and dimensionality on the perturbation pressure and vertical velocity in cumulus convection. Part I: Simple, generalized analytic solutions, J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 1441–1454, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0040.1, 2016a.
Morrison, H.: Impacts of updraft size and dimensionality on the perturbation pressure and vertical velocity in cumulus convection. Part II: Comparison of theoretical and numerical solutions and fully dynamical simulations, J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 1455–1480, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0041.1, 2016.
Morrison, H. and Grabowski, W. W.: Response of Tropical Deep Convection to Localized Heating Perturbations: Implications for Aerosol-Induced Convective Invigoration, J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 3533–555, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-027.1, 2013.
Morton, B. R.: Modeling fire plumes, Symposium (International) on
Combustion, 10, 973–982, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(65)80240-5,
1965.
Morton, B. R., Taylor, G. I., and Turner, J. S.: Turbulent gravitational
convection from maintained and instantaneous sources, P. Roy. Soc. Lond. A
Mat., 234, 1–23, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1956.0011, 1956.
Mukhopadhyay, P., Taraphdar, S., Goswami, B. N., and Krishnakumar, K.:
Indian Summer Monsoon Precipitation Climatology in a High-Resolution
Regional Climate Model: Impacts of Convective Parameterization on Systematic
Biases, Weather Forecast., 25, 369–387,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2009WAF2222320.1, 2010.
Nam, C. C. W., Quaas, J., Neggers, R., Drian, C. S.-L., and Isotta, F.:
Evaluation of boundary layer cloud parameterizations in the ECHAM5 general
circulation model using CALIPSO and CloudSat satellite data, J. Adv. Model.
Earth Sy., 6, 300–314, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013MS000277, 2014.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine: Thriving on Our Changing Planet: A Decadal Strategy for Earth Observation from Space, The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., https://doi.org/10.17226/24938, 2018.
National Centers for Environmental Prediction/National Weather Service/NOAA/U.S. Department of Commerce: NCEP GFS 0.25 Degree Global Forecast Grids Historical Archive, Research Data Archive at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, Computational and Information Systems Laboratory [data set], https://doi.org/10.5065/D65D8PWK (last access: 22 November 2020), 2015, updated daily.
Naumann, A. K., Seifert, A., and Mellado, J. P.: A refined statistical cloud closure using double-Gaussian probability density functions, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 1641–1657, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1641-2013, 2013.
Neale, R. B., Richter, J. H., and Jochum, M.: The Impact of Convection on
ENSO: From a Delayed Oscillator to a Series of Events, J. Climate, 21,
5904–5924, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2244.1, 2008.
Neggers, R.: Humidity-convection feedbacks in a mass flux scheme based on resolved size densities, ECMWF Workshop on Parametrization of Clouds and Precipitation, 10, https://www.ecmwf.int/node/14800 (last access: 5 September 2021), 2012.
Neggers, R. A. J.: A Dual Mass Flux Framework for Boundary Layer Convection.
Part II: Clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 1489–1506,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAS2636.1, 2009.
Neggers, R. A. J.: Exploring bin-macrophysics models for moist convective
transport and clouds, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 7, 2079–2104,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015MS000502, 2015.
Neggers, R. A. J. and Griewank, P. J.: A Binomial Stochastic Framework for
Efficiently Modeling Discrete Statistics of Convective Populations, J. Adv.
Model. Earth Sy., 13, e2020MS002229, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002229,
2021.
Neggers, R. A. J. and Siebesma, A. P.: Constraining a System of Interacting
Parameterizations through Multiple-Parameter Evaluation: Tracing a
Compensating Error between Cloud Vertical Structure and Cloud Overlap, J.
Climate, 26, 6698–6715, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00779.1, 2013.
Neggers, R. A. J., Siebesma, A. P., and Jonker, H. J. J.: A Multiparcel
Model for Shallow Cumulus Convection, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 1655–1668,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<1655:AMMFSC>2.0.CO;2, 2002.
Neggers, R. A. J., Jonker, H. J. J., and Siebesma, A. P.: Size Statistics of
Cumulus Cloud Populations in Large-Eddy Simulations, J. Atmos. Sci., 60,
1060–1074, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2003)60<1060:SSOCCP>2.0.CO;2, 2003.
Neggers, R. A. J., Siebesma, A. P., Lenderink, G., and Holtslag, A. A. M.:
An Evaluation of Mass Flux Closures for Diurnal Cycles of Shallow Cumulus,
Mon. Weather Rev., 132, 2525–2538, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR2776.1, 2004.
Neggers, R. A. J., Stevens, B., and Neelin, J. D.: Variance scaling in
shallow-cumulus-topped mixed layers, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 133,
1629–1641, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.105, 2007.
Neggers, R. A. J., Köhler, M., and Beljaars, A. C. M.: A Dual Mass Flux
Framework for Boundary Layer Convection. Part I: Transport, J. Atmos. Sci.,
66, 1465–1487, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAS2635.1, 2009.
Neggers, R. A. J., Siebesma, A. P., and Heus, T.: Continuous Single-Column
Model Evaluation at a Permanent Meteorological Supersite, B. Am. Meteorol.
Soc., 93, 1389–1400, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00162.1, 2012.
Neggers, R. A. J., Griewank, P. J., and Heus, T.: Power-Law Scaling in the
Internal Variability of Cumulus Cloud Size Distributions due to Subsampling
and Spatial Organization, J. Atmos. Sci., 76, 1489–1503,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0194.1, 2019.
Nie, J. and Kuang, Z.: Responses of Shallow Cumulus Convection to
Large-Scale Temperature and Moisture Perturbations: A Comparison of
Large-Eddy Simulations and a Convective Parameterization Based on
Stochastically Entraining Parcels, J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 1936–1956,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-0279.1, 2012.
Nitta, T.: Observational Determination of Cloud Mass Flux Distributions, J.
Atmos. Sci., 32, 73–91, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1975)032<0073:ODOCMF>2.0.CO;2, 1975.
Niziol, T. A., Snyder, W. R., and Waldstreicher, J. S.: Winter Weather
Forecasting throughout the Eastern United States. Part IV: Lake Effect Snow,
Weather Forecast., 10, 61–77,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1995)010<0061:WWFTTE>2.0.CO;2, 1995.
Nober, F. J. and Graf, H. F.: A new convective cloud field model based on principles of self-organisation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2749–2759, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2749-2005, 2005.
Nober, F. J., Graf, H.-F., and Rosenfeld, D.: Sensitivity of the global
circulation to the suppression of precipitation by anthropogenic aerosols,
Global Planet. Change, 37, 57–80,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8181(02)00191-1, 2003.
Nordeng, T.-E.: Extended versions of the convective parametrization scheme
at ECMWF and their impact on the mean and transient activity of the model in
the tropics, Research Department Technical Memorandum, no. 206, 1994.
O'Gorman, P. A. and Dwyer, J. G.: Using Machine Learning to Parameterize Moist Convection: Potential for Modeling of Climate, Climate Change, and Extreme Events, J. Adv. Model Earth Sy., 10, 2548–2563, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001351, 2018.
Okamoto, K. I., Ushio, T., Iguchi, T., Takahashi, N., and Iwanami, K.: The
global satellite mapping of precipitation (GSMaP) project, Aqua (AMSR-E),
3414–3416, https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2005.1526575, 2005.
Olson, J., Kenyon, J., Angevine, W. A., Brown, J. M., Pagowski, M., and Sušelj, K. (Eds.): A Description of the MYNN-EDMF Scheme and the Coupling to Other Components in WRF–ARW, NOAA Technical Memorandum OAR GSD, 61, https://doi.org/10.25923/N9WM-BE49, 2019.
Ooyama, K.: A dynamical model for the study of tropical cyclone
development., Geofis. Int., 4, 187–198, 1964.
Ooyama, K.: A Theory on Parameterization of Cumulus Convection, J. Meteorol.
Soc. Jpn., 49A, 744–756,
https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj1965.49A.0_744, 1971.
Oueslati, B. and Bellon, G.: Convective Entrainment and Large-Scale
Organization of Tropical Precipitation: Sensitivity of the CNRM-CM5
Hierarchy of Models, J. Climate, 26, 2931–2946,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00314.1, 2013.
Paluch, I. R.: The Entrainment Mechanism in Colorado Cumuli, J. Atmos. Sci.,
36, 2467–2478, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1979)036<2467:TEMICC>2.0.CO;2, 1979.
Pan, D.-M. and Randall, D. D. A.: A cumulus parameterization with a
prognostic closure, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 124, 949–981,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712454714, 1998.
Pan, H.-L. and Wu, W.-S.: Implementing a mass flux convection parameterization package for the NMC medium-range forecast model, National Centers for Environmental Prediction (U.S.), Office note (National Centers for Environmental Prediction (U.S.)), 409, https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/11429 (last access: 5 September 2021), 1995.
Panosetti, D., Böing, S., Schlemmer, L., and Schmidli, J.: Idealized Large-Eddy and Convection-Resolving Simulations of Moist Convection over Mountainous Terrain, J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 4021–4041, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0341.1, 2016.
Park, S.: A Unified Convection Scheme (UNICON). Part I: Formulation, J.
Atmos. Sci., 71, 3902–3930, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-0233.1, 2014a.
Park, S.: A Unified Convection Scheme (UNICON). Part II: Simulation, J.
Atmos. Sci., 71, 3931–3973, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-0234.1, 2014b.
Park, S. and Bretherton, C. S.: The University of Washington Shallow
Convection and Moist Turbulence Schemes and Their Impact on Climate
Simulations with the Community Atmosphere Model, J. Climate, 22, 3449–3469,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2557.1, 2009.
Park, S., Baek, E.-H., Kim, B.-M., and Kim, S.-J.: Impact of detrained
cumulus on climate simulated by the Community Atmosphere Model Version 5
with a unified convection scheme, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 9, 1399–1411,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016MS000877, 2017.
Patz, J. A., Campbell-Lendrum, D., Holloway, T., and Foley, J. A.: Impact of
regional climate change on human health, Nature, 438, 310–317,
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04188, 2005.
Peng, J., Li, Z., Zhang, H., Liu, J., and Cribb, M.: Systematic Changes in Cloud Radiative Forcing with Aerosol Loading for Deep Clouds in the Tropics, J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 231–249, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0080.1, 2016.
Peng, M. S., Ridout, J. A., and Hogan, T. F.: Recent Modifications of the
Emanuel Convective Scheme in the Navy Operational Global Atmospheric
Prediction System, Mon. Weather Rev., 132, 1254–1268,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<1254:RMOTEC>2.0.CO;2, 2004.
Pergaud, J., Masson, V., Malardel, S., and Couvreux, F.: A Parameterization
of Dry Thermals and Shallow Cumuli for Mesoscale Numerical Weather
Prediction, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 132, 83,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-009-9388-0, 2009.
Perraud, E., Couvreux, F., Malardel, S., Lac, C., Masson, V., and Thouron,
O.: Evaluation of Statistical Distributions for the Parametrization of
Subgrid Boundary-Layer Clouds, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 140, 263–294,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-011-9607-3, 2011.
Peters, J. M.: The impact of effective buoyancy and dynamic pressure forcing on vertical velocities within two-dimensional updrafts, J. Atmos. Sci., t3, 4531–4551, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0016.1, 2016.
Peters, K., Jakob, C., Davies, L., Khouider, B., and Majda, A. J.:
Stochastic Behavior of Tropical Convection in Observations and a Multicloud
Model, J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 3556–3575,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-031.1, 2013.
Peters, K., Crueger, T., Jakob, C., and Möbis, B.: Improved
MJO-simulation in ECHAM6.3 by coupling a Stochastic Multicloud Model to the
convection scheme, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 9, 193–219,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016MS000809, 2017.
Petersen, A. C., Beets, C., Dop, H. van, Duynkerke, P. G., and Siebesma, A.
P.: Mass-Flux Characteristics of Reactive Scalars in the Convective Boundary
Layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 37–56,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<0037:MFCORS>2.0.CO;2, 1999.
Pezzi, L. P., Cavalcanti, I. F. A., and Mendonça, A. M.: A sensitivity
study using two different convection schemes over south america, Revista
Brasileira de Meteorologia, 23, 170–189,
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-77862008000200006, 2008.
Pham-Duc, B., Sylvestre, F., Papa, F., Frappart, F., Bouchez, C., and
Crétaux, J.-F.: The Lake Chad hydrology under current climate change,
Sci. Rep.-UK, 10, 5498, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62417-w, 2020.
Piriou, J.-M., Redelsperger, J.-L., Geleyn, J.-F., Lafore, J.-P., and
Guichard, F.: An Approach for Convective Parameterization with Memory:
Separating Microphysics and Transport in Grid-Scale Equations, J. Atmos.
Sci., 64, 4127–4139, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAS2144.1, 2007.
Plant, R. S.: A review of the theoretical basis for bulk mass flux convective parameterization, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 3529–3544, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3529-2010, 2010.
Plant, R. S. and Craig, G. C.: A Stochastic Parameterization for Deep
Convection Based on Equilibrium Statistics, J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 87–105,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAS2263.1, 2008.
Plant, R. S. and Yano, J.-I.: Parameterization of Atmospheric Convection:
(In 2 Volumes) Volume 1: Theoretical Background and FormulationVolume 2:
Current Issues and New Theories, Imperial College Press,
https://doi.org/10.1142/p1005, 2015.
Prein, A. F., Gobiet, A., Suklitsch, M., Truhetz, H., Awan, N. K., Keuler,
K., and Georgievski, G.: Added value of convection permitting seasonal
simulations, Clim. Dynam., 41, 2655–2677,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1744-6, 2013.
Prein, A. F., Langhans, W., Fosser, G., Ferrone, A., Ban, N., Goergen, K.,
Keller, M., Tölle, M., Gutjahr, O., Feser, F., Brisson, E., Kollet, S.,
Schmidli, J., Lipzig, N. P. M. van, and Leung, R.: A review on regional
convection-permitting climate modeling: Demonstrations, prospects, and
challenges, Rev. Geophys., 53, 323–361,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014RG000475, 2015.
Qian, L., Young, G. S., and Frank, W. M.: A Convective Wake Parameterization
Scheme for Use in General Circulation Models, Mon. Weather Rev., 126,
456–469, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126<0456:ACWPSF>2.0.CO;2, 1998.
Qin, Y., Lin, Y., Xu, S., Ma, H.-Y., and Xie, S.: A Diagnostic PDF Cloud
Scheme to Improve Subtropical Low Clouds in NCAR Community Atmosphere Model
(CAM5), J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 10, 320–341,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS001095, 2018.
Raga, G. B., Jensen, J. B., and Baker, M. B.: Characteristics of Cumulus
Band Clouds off the Coast of Hawaii, J. Atmos. Sci., 47, 338–356,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1990)047<0338:COCBCO>2.0.CO;2, 1990.
Raju, P. V. S., Bhatla, R., Almazroui, M., and Assiri, M.: Performance of
convection schemes on the simulation of summer monsoon features over the
South Asia CORDEX domain using RegCM-4.3, Int. J. Climatol., 35, 4695–4706,
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4317, 2015.
Ramanathan, V. and Collins, W.: Thermodynamic regulation of ocean warming by
cirrus clouds deduced from observations of the 1987 El Niño, Nature,
351, 27–32, https://doi.org/10.1038/351027a0, 1991.
Randall, D., Khairoutdinov, M., Arakawa, A., and Grabowski, W.: Breaking the
Cloud Parameterization Deadlock, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 84, 1547–1564,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-84-11-1547, 2003.
Randall, D. A. and Pan, D.-M.: Implementation of the Arakawa-Schubert
Cumulus Parameterization with a Prognostic Closure, in: The Representation
of Cumulus Convection in Numerical Models, edited by: Emanuel, K. A. and
Raymond, D. J., American Meteorological Society, Boston, MA, 137–144,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-935704-13-3_11, 1993.
Randall, D. A., Shao, Q., and Moeng, C.-H.: A Second-Order Bulk
Boundary-Layer Model, J. Atmos. Sci., 49, 1903–1923,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1992)049<1903:ASOBBL>2.0.CO;2, 1992.
Randall, D. A., Srinivasan, J., Nanjundiah, R. A., and Mukhopadhyay, P.
(Eds.): Current Trends in the Representation of Physical Processes in
Weather and Climate Models, Springer Singapore,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3396-5, 2019.
Rasp, S., Pritchard, M. S., and Gentine, P.: Deep learning to represent subgrid processes in climate models, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 9684–9689, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810286115, 2018.
Rauber, R. M., Stevens, B., Ochs, H. T., Knight, C., Albrecht, B. A.,
Blythe, A. M., Fairall, C. W., Jensen, J. B., Lasher-Trapp, S. G.,
Mayol-Bracero, O. L., Vali, G., Anderson, J. R., Baker, B. A., Bandy, A. R.,
Brunet, E., Brenguier, J. L., Brewer, W. A., Brown, P. R. A., Chuang, P.,
Cotton, W. R., Girolamo, L. D., Geerts, B., Gerber, H., Göke, S., Gomes,
L., Heikes, B. G., Hudson, J. G., Kollias, P., Lawson, R. P., Krueger, S.
K., Lenschow, D. H., Nuijens, L., O'Sullivan, D. W., Rilling, R. A., Rogers,
D. C., Siebesma, A. P., Snodgrass, F., Stith, J. L., Thornton, D. C.,
Tucker, S., Twohy, C. H., and Zuidema, P.: Rain in shallow cumulus over the
ocean: The RICO campaign, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 88, 1912–1928,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-88-12-1912, 2007.
Raymond, D. J.: Regulation of Moist Convection over the West Pacific Warm
Pool, J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 3945–3959,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1995)052<3945:ROMCOT>2.0.CO;2, 1995.
Raymond, D. J. and Blyth, A. M.: A Stochastic Mixing Model for
Nonprecipitating Cumulus Clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 43, 2708–2718,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1986)043<2708:ASMMFN>2.0.CO;2, 1986.
Raymond, D. J. and Emanuel, K. A.: The Kuo Cumulus Parameterization, in: The
Representation of Cumulus Convection in Numerical Models, edited by:
Emanuel, K. A. and Raymond, D. J., American Meteorological Society, Boston,
MA, 145–147, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-935704-13-3_12,
1993.
Rennó, N. O., Emanuel, K. A., and Stone, P. H.: Radiative-convective
model with an explicit hydrologic cycle: 1. Formulation and sensitivity to
model parameters, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 99, 14429–14441,
https://doi.org/10.1029/94JD00020, 1994.
Reuter, G. W. and Yau, M. K.: Mixing Mechanisms in Cumulus Congestus Clouds.
Part II: Numerical Simulations, J. Atmos. Sci., 44, 798–827,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1987)044<0798:MMICCC>2.0.CO;2, 1987.
Rio, C. and Hourdin, F.: A Thermal Plume Model for the Convective Boundary
Layer: Representation of Cumulus Clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 407–425,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAS2256.1, 2008.
Rio, C., Hourdin, F., Grandpeix, J.-Y., and Lafore, J.-P.: Shifting the
diurnal cycle of parameterized deep convection over land, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 36, L07809, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036779, 2009.
Rio, C., Hourdin, F., Couvreux, F., and Jam, A.: Resolved Versus
Parametrized Boundary-Layer Plumes. Part II: Continuous Formulations of
Mixing Rates for Mass-Flux Schemes, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 135, 469–483,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-010-9478-z, 2010.
Rio, C., Grandpeix, J.-Y., Hourdin, F., Guichard, F., Couvreux, F., Lafore,
J.-P., Fridlind, A., Mrowiec, A., Roehrig, R., Rochetin, N., Lefebvre,
M.-P., and Idelkadi, A.: Control of deep convection by sub-cloud lifting
processes: the ALP closure in the LMDZ5B general circulation model, Clim.
Dynam., 40, 2271–2292, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1506-x, 2013.
Rio, C., Del Genio, A. D., and Hourdin, F.: Ongoing Breakthroughs in
Convective Parameterization, Curr. Clim. Change Rep., 5, 95–111,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-019-00127-w, 2019.
Rocha, R. P. D. and Caetano, E.: The role of convective parameterization in
the simulation of a cyclone over the South Atlantic, Atmosfera. 23, 1–23,
2010.
Rochetin, N., Couvreux, F., Grandpeix, J.-Y., and Rio, C.: Deep Convection
Triggering by Boundary Layer Thermals. Part I: LES Analysis and Stochastic
Triggering Formulation, J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 496–514,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0336.1, 2014a.
Rochetin, N., Grandpeix, J.-Y., Rio, C., and Couvreux, F.: Deep Convection
Triggering by Boundary Layer Thermals. Part II: Stochastic Triggering
Parameterization for the LMDZ GCM, J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 515–538,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0337.1, 2014b.
Romps, D. M.: A Direct Measure of Entrainment, J. Atmos. Sci., 67,
1908–1927, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAS3371.1, 2010.
Romps, D. M.: The Stochastic Parcel Model: A deterministic parameterization
of stochastically entraining convection, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 8,
319–344, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015MS000537, 2016.
Romps, D. M. and Kuang, Z.: Do Undiluted Convective Plumes Exist in the
Upper Tropical Troposphere?, J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 468–484,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAS3184.1, 2010a.
Romps, D. M. and Kuang, Z.: Nature versus Nurture in Shallow Convection, J.
Atmos. Sci., 67, 1655–1666, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAS3307.1, 2010b.
Rosa, D. and Collins, W. D.: A case study of subdaily simulated and observed
continental convective precipitation: CMIP5 and multiscale global climate
models comparison, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 5999–6003,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL057987, 2013.
Rosenfeld, D., Lohmann, U., Raga, G., O'Dowd, C., Kulmala, M., Sandro, F.,
Reissell, A., and Andreae, M.: Flood or drought: How do aerosols affect
precipitation?, Science, 321, 1309–1313, 2008.
Rougier, J., Sexton, D. M. H., Murphy, J. M., and Stainforth, D.: Analyzing
the Climate Sensitivity of the HadSM3 Climate Model Using Ensembles from
Different but Related Experiments, J. Climate, 22, 3540–3557,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2533.1, 2009.
Ruiz, J. J., Pulido, M., and Miyoshi, T.: Estimating Model Parameters with
Ensemble-Based Data Assimilation: A Review, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 91,
79–99, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2013-201, 2013.
Sakradzija, M. and Klocke, D.: Physically Constrained Stochastic Shallow
Convection in Realistic Kilometer-Scale Simulations, J. Adv. Model. Earth
Sy., 10, 2755–2776, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001358, 2018.
Sakradzija, M., Seifert, A., and Heus, T.: Fluctuations in a quasi-stationary shallow cumulus cloud ensemble, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 22, 65–85, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-22-65-2015, 2015.
Sakradzija, M., Seifert, A., and Dipankar, A.: A stochastic scale-aware
parameterization of shallow cumulus convection across the convective gray
zone, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 8, 786–812,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016MS000634, 2016.
Sanderson, B. M., Piani, C., Ingram, W. J., Stone, D. A., and Allen, M. R.:
Towards constraining climate sensitivity by linear analysis of feedback
patterns in thousands of perturbed-physics GCM simulations, Clim. Dynam.,
30, 175–190, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-007-0280-7, 2008.
Sato, T., Miura, H., Satoh, M., Takayabu, Y. N., and Wang, Y.: Diurnal Cycle
of Precipitation in the Tropics Simulated in a Global Cloud-Resolving Model,
J. Climate, 22, 4809–4826, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2890.1, 2009.
Schlemmer, L. and Hohenegger, C.: The Formation of Wider and Deeper Clouds
as a Result of Cold-Pool Dynamics, J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 2842–2858,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-0170.1, 2014.
Schmidt, G. A., Bader, D., Donner, L. J., Elsaesser, G. S., Golaz, J.-C., Hannay, C., Molod, A., Neale, R. B., and Saha, S.: Practice and philosophy of climate model tuning across six US modeling centers, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3207–3223, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3207-2017, 2017.
Schneider, T., Lan, S., Stuart, A., and Teixeira, J.: Earth System Modeling
2.0: A Blueprint for Models That Learn From Observations and Targeted
High-Resolution Simulations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 12396–12417,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076101, 2017.
Shin, J. and Park, S.: A Stochastic Unified Convection Scheme (UNICON). Part
I: Formulation and Single-Column Simulation for Shallow Convection, J.
Atmos. Sci., 77, 583–610, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-19-0117.1, 2020.
Shutts, G.: A kinetic energy backscatter algorithm for use in ensemble
prediction systems, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 3079–3102,
https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.106, 2005.
Siebesma, A. P.: Shallow Cumulus Convection, in: Buoyant Convection in
Geophysical Flows, edited by: Plate, E. J., Fedorovich, E. E., Viegas, D.
X., and Wyngaard, J. C., Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 441–486,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5058-3_19, 1998.
Siebesma, A. P. and Cuijpers, J. W. M.: Evaluation of Parametric Assumptions
for Shallow Cumulus Convection, J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 650–666,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1995)052<0650:EOPAFS>2.0.CO;2, 1995.
Siebesma, A. P. and Holtslag, A. A. M.: Model Impacts of Entrainment and
Detrainment Rates in Shallow Cumulus Convection, J. Atmos. Sci., 53,
2354–2364, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1996)053<2354:MIOEAD>2.0.CO;2, 1996.
Siebesma, A. P. and Teixeira, J.: An Advection-Diffusion scheme for the convective boundary layer: description and 1d-results, 14th Symp. on Boundary Layers and Turbulence, 9 August 2000, Aspen, CO, 133–136, 2000.
Siebesma, A. P., Bretherton, C. S., Brown, A., Chlond, A., Cuxart, J.,
Duynkerke, P. G., Jiang, H., Khairoutdinov, M., Lewellen, D., Moeng, C.-H.,
Sanchez, E., Stevens, B., and Stevens, D. E.: A Large Eddy Simulation
Intercomparison Study of Shallow Cumulus Convection, J. Atmos. Sci., 60,
1201–1219, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2003)60<1201:ALESIS>2.0.CO;2, 2003.
Siebesma, A. P., Soares, P. M. M., and Teixeira, J.: A Combined
Eddy-Diffusivity Mass-Flux Approach for the Convective Boundary Layer, J.
Atmos. Sci., 64, 1230–1248, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3888.1, 2007.
Simpson, J.: On Cumulus Entrainment and One-Dimensional Models, J. Atmos.
Sci., 28, 449–455, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1971)028<0449:OCEAOD>2.0.CO;2, 1971.
Simpson, J. and Wiggert, V.: Modes of Precipitating Cumulus Towers, Mon. Weather Rev., 97, 471–489, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-850493(1969)097<0471:MOPCT>2.3.CO;2, 1969.
Singh, M. S., Warren, R. A., and Jakob, C.: A Steady-State Model for the
Relationship Between Humidity, Instability, and Precipitation in the
Tropics, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy.,11, 3973–3994,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001686, 2019.
Skofronick-Jackson, G., Kulie, M., Milani, L., Munchak, S. J., Wood, N. B.,
and Levizzani, V.: Satellite Estimation of Falling Snow: A Global
Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Core Observatory Perspective, J. Appl.
Meteorol. Clim., 58, 1429–1448, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-18-0124.1,
2019.
Slingo, J., Blackburn, M., Betts, A., Brugge, R., Hodges, K., Hoskins, B.,
Miller, M., Steenman-Clark, L., and Thuburn, J.: Mean climate and transience
in the tropics of the UGAMP GCM: Sensitivity to convective parametrization,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 120, 881–922,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712051807, 1994.
Smagorinsky, J.: On the inclusion of moist adiabatic processes in numerical
prediction models, Ber. Dtsch. Wetterdienstes, 38, 82–90, 1956.
Smith, L. A.: What might we learn from climate forecasts?, P. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA, 99, 2487–2492, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.012580599, 2002.
Smith, R. N. B.: A scheme for predicting layer clouds and their water
content in a general circulation model, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 116,
435–460, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49711649210, 1990.
Soares, P. M. M., Miranda, P. M. A., Siebesma, A. P., and Teixeira, J.: An
eddy-diffusivity/mass-flux parametrization for dry and shallow cumulus
convection, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 130, 3365–3383,
https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.03.223, 2004.
Sommeria, G. and Deardorff, J. W.: Subgrid-Scale Condensation in Models of
Nonprecipitating Clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 34, 344–355,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1977)034<0344:SSCIMO>2.0.CO;2, 1977.
Song, F. and Zhang, G. J.: Improving Trigger Functions for Convective
Parameterization Schemes Using GOAmazon Observations, J. Climate, 30,
8711–8726, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0042.1, 2017.
Song, H., Lin, W., Lin, Y., Wolf, A. B., Neggers, R., Donner, L. J., Genio,
A. D. D., and Liu, Y.: Evaluation of Precipitation Simulated by Seven SCMs
against the ARM Observations at the SGP Site, J. Climate, 26, 5467–5492,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00263.1, 2013.
Song, X. and Zhang, G. J.: Convection Parameterization, Tropical Pacific
Double ITCZ, and Upper-Ocean Biases in the NCAR CCSM3. Part I: Climatology
and Atmospheric Feedback, J. Climate, 22, 4299–4315,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2642.1, 2009.
Song, X. and Zhang, G. J.: Microphysics parameterization for convective
clouds in a global climate model: Description and single-column model tests,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D02201, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014833, 2011.
Song, X. and Zhang, G. J.: The Roles of Convection Parameterization in the
Formation of Double ITCZ Syndrome in the NCAR CESM: I. Atmospheric
Processes, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 10, 842–866,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS001191, 2018.
Song, X., Zhang, G. J., and Li, J.-L. F.: Evaluation of Microphysics
Parameterization for Convective Clouds in the NCAR Community Atmosphere
Model CAM5, J. Climate, 25, 8568–8590,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00563.1, 2012.
Song, Y., Wikle, C. K., Anderson, C. J., and Lack, S. A.: Bayesian
Estimation of Stochastic Parameterizations in a Numerical Weather
Forecasting Model, Mon. Weather Rev., 135, 4045–4059,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2007MWR1928.1, 2007.
Squires, P.: Penetrative Downdraughts in Cumuli, Tellus, 10, 381–389,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1958.tb02025.x, 1958.
Squires, P. and Turner, J. S.: An entraining jet model for cumulo-nimbus
updraughts, Tellus, 14, 422–434,
https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v14i4.9569, 1962.
Stechmann, S. N. and Neelin, J. D.: A Stochastic Model for the Transition to
Strong Convection, J. Atmos. Sci., 68, 2955–2970,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-028.1, 2011.
Stensrud, D. J.: Parameterization Schemes: Keys to Understanding Numerical
Weather Prediction Models, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812590, 2007.
Stephens, G. L., L'Ecuyer, T., Forbes, R., Gettelmen, A., Golaz, J.-C.,
Bodas-Salcedo, A., Suzuki, K., Gabriel, P., and Haynes, J.: Dreary state of
precipitation in global models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D24211,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014532, 2010.
Stephens, G. L., van den Heever, S. C., Haddad, Z. S., Posselt, D. J., Storer, R. L., Grant, L. D., Sy, O. O., Rao, T. N., Tanelli, S., and Peral, E.: A distributed small satellite approach for measuring convective transports in the Earth's atmosphere, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 58, 4–13, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2019.2918090, 2020.
Stevens, B., Giorgetta, M., Esch, M., Mauritsen, T., Crueger, T., Rast, S.,
Salzmann, M., Schmidt, H., Bader, J., Block, K., Brokopf, R., Fast, I.,
Kinne, S., Kornblueh, L., Lohmann, U., Pincus, R., Reichler, T., and
Roeckner, E.: Atmospheric component of the MPI-M Earth System Model: ECHAM6,
J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 5, 146–172, https://doi.org/10.1002/jame.20015,
2013.
Stirling, A. J. and Stratton, R. A.: Entrainment processes in the diurnal
cycle of deep convection over land, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 138,
1135–1149, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.1868, 2012.
Stommel, H.: ENTRAINMENT OF AIR INTO A CUMULUS CLOUD: (Paper presented 27
December 1946 at the Annual Meeting, A.M.S., Cambridge, Massachusetts), J.
Atmos. Sci., 4, 91–94, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1947)004<0091:EOAIAC>2.0.CO;2, 1947.
Storer, R. L., van den Heever, S. C., and Stephens, G. L.: Modeling Aerosol Impacts on Convective Storms in Different Environments, J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 3904–3915, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAS3363.1, 2010.
Storer, R. L., Zhang, G. J., and Song, X.: Effects of Convective
Microphysics Parameterization on Large-Scale Cloud Hydrological Cycle and
Radiative Budget in Tropical and Midlatitude Convective Regions, J. Climate,
28, 9277–9297, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0064.1, 2015.
Stratton, R. A. and Stirling, A. J.: Improving the diurnal cycle of
convection in GCMs, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 138, 1121–1134,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.991, 2012.
Sud, Y. C. and Walker, G. K.: Microphysics of Clouds with the Relaxed
Arakawa–Schubert Scheme (McRAS). Part I: Design and Evaluation with GATE
Phase III Data, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 3196–3220,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<3196:MOCWTR>2.0.CO;2, 1999.
Suhas, E. and Zhang, G. J.: Evaluation of Trigger Functions for Convective
Parameterization Schemes Using Observations, J. Climate, 27, 7647–7666,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00718.1, 2014.
Sun, J. and Pritchard, M. S.: Effects of explicit convection on global
land-atmosphere coupling in the superparameterized CAM, J. Adv. Model. Earth
Sy., 8, 1248–1269, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016MS000689, 2016.
Sun, Y., Solomon, S., Dai, A., and Portmann, R. W.: How Often Does It Rain?,
J. Climate, 19, 916–934, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3672.1, 2006.
Sundqvist, H.: A parameterization scheme for non-convective condensation
including prediction of cloud water content, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 104,
677–690, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49710444110, 1978.
Sundqvist, H.: Parameterization of Condensation and Associated Clouds in
Models for Weather Prediction and General Circulation Simulation, in:
Physically-Based Modelling and Simulation of Climate and Climatic Change:
Part 1, edited by: Schlesinger, M. E., Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht,
433–461, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3041-4_10, 1988.
Sušelj, K., Teixeira, J., and Matheou, G.: Eddy Diffusivity/Mass Flux
and Shallow Cumulus Boundary Layer: An Updraft PDF Multiple Mass Flux
Scheme, J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 1513–1533,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-090.1, 2012.
Sušelj, K., Teixeira, J., and Chung, D.: A Unified Model for Moist
Convective Boundary Layers Based on a Stochastic Eddy-Diffusivity/Mass-Flux
Parameterization, J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 1929–1953,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0106.1, 2013.
Sušelj, K., Hogan, T. F., and Teixeira, J.: Implementation of a
Stochastic Eddy-Diffusivity/Mass-Flux Parameterization into the Navy Global
Environmental Model, Weather Forecast., 29, 1374–1390,
https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-14-00043.1, 2014.
Suselj, K., Kurowski, M. J., and Teixeira, J.: A Unified
Eddy-Diffusivity/Mass-Flux Approach for Modeling Atmospheric Convection, J.
Atmos. Sci., 76, 2505–2537, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0239.1, 2019a.
Suselj, K., Kurowski, M. J., and Teixeira, J.: On the Factors Controlling
the Development of Shallow Convection in Eddy-Diffusivity/Mass-Flux Models,
J. Atmos. Sci., 76, 433–456, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0121.1,
2019b.
Tan, Z., Kaul, C. M., Pressel, K. G., Cohen, Y., Schneider, T., and
Teixeira, J.: An Extended Eddy-Diffusivity Mass-Flux Scheme for Unified
Representation of Subgrid-Scale Turbulence and Convection, J. Adv. Model.
Earth Sy., 10, 770–800, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS001162, 2018.
Tao, W.-K., Chen, J.-P., Li, Z., Wang, C., and Zhang, C.: Impact of aerosols
on convective clouds and precipitation, Rev. Geophys., 50, RG2001,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011RG000369, 2012.
Tapiador, F. J., Hou, A. Y., de Castro, M., Checa, R., Cuartero, F., and
Barros, A. P.: Precipitation estimates for hydroelectricity, Energ. Environ.
Sci., 4, 4435–4448, https://doi.org/10.1039/C1EE01745D, 2011.
Tapiador, F. J., Turk, F. J., Petersen, W., Hou, A. Y., García-Ortega,
E., Machado, L. A. T., Angelis, C. F., Salio, P., Kidd, C., Huffman, G. J.,
and de Castro, M.: Global precipitation measurement: Methods, datasets and
applications, Atmos. Res., 104–105, 70–97,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.10.021, 2012.
Tapiador, F. J., Navarro, A., Levizzani, V., García-Ortega, E.,
Huffman, G. J., Kidd, C., Kucera, P. A., Kummerow, C. D., Masunaga, H.,
Petersen, W. A., Roca, R., Sánchez, J.-L., Tao, W.-K., and Turk, F. J.:
Global precipitation measurements for validating climate models, Atmos.
Res., 197, 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.06.021, 2017.
Tapiador, F. J., Navarro, A., Jiménez, A., Moreno, R., and
García-Ortega, E.: Discrepancies with satellite observations in the
spatial structure of global precipitation as derived from global climate
models, . J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 144, 419–435,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3289, 2018.
Tapiador, F. J., Roca, R., Del Genio, A., Dewitte, B., Petersen, W., and
Zhang, F.: Is Precipitation a Good Metric for Model Performance?, B. Am.
Meteorol. Soc., 100, 223–233, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0218.1,
2019a.
Tapiador, F. J., Sánchez, J.-L., and García-Ortega, E.: Empirical
values and assumptions in the microphysics of numerical models, Atmos. Res.,
215, 214–238, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.09.010, 2019b.
Tawfik, A. B. and Dirmeyer, P. A.: A process-based framework for quantifying
the atmospheric preconditioning of surface-triggered convection, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 41, 173–178, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL057984, 2014.
Tawfik, A. B., Lawrence, D. M., and Dirmeyer, P. A.: Representing subgrid
convective initiation in the Community Earth System Model, J. Adv. Model.
Earth Sy., 9, 1740–1758, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016MS000866, 2017.
Taylor, G. R. and Baker, M. B.: Entrainment and Detrainment in Cumulus
Clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 48, 112–121,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1991)048<0112:EADICC>2.0.CO;2, 1991.
Teixeira, J. and Kim, Y. J.: On a simple parameterization of convective cloud fraction, Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci., 44, 191–199, 2008.
Teixeira, J. and Reynolds, C. A.: Stochastic Nature of Physical
Parameterizations in Ensemble Prediction: A Stochastic Convection Approach,
Mon. Weather Rev., 136, 483–496, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007MWR1870.1,
2008.
Telford, J. W.: Turbulence, entrainment, and mixing in cloud dynamics, Pure
Appl. Geophys., 113, 1067–1084, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01592975, 1975.
Thayer-Calder, K.: Downdraft impacts on tropical convection, Colorado State University, Publication Number: AAT 3565466, ISBN 9781303152504, 2012.
Thayer-Calder, K. and Randall, D. A.: The Role of Convective Moistening in
the Madden–Julian Oscillation, J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 3297–3312,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAS3081.1, 2009.
Thayer-Calder, K., Gettelman, A., Craig, C., Goldhaber, S., Bogenschutz, P. A., Chen, C.-C., Morrison, H., Höft, J., Raut, E., Griffin, B. M., Weber, J. K., Larson, V. E., Wyant, M. C., Wang, M., Guo, Z., and Ghan, S. J.: A unified parameterization of clouds and turbulence using CLUBB and subcolumns in the Community Atmosphere Model, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 3801–3821, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3801-2015, 2015.
Tiedtke, M.: A Comprehensive Mass Flux Scheme for Cumulus Parameterization
in Large-Scale Models, Mon. Weather Rev., 117, 1779–1800,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117<1779:ACMFSF>2.0.CO;2, 1989.
Tiedtke, M.: Representation of Clouds in Large-Scale Models, Mon. Weather Rev., 121, 3040–3061, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1993)121<3040:ROCILS>2.0.CO;2, 1993.
Tokioka, T., Yamazaki, K., Kitoh, A., and Ose, T.: The Equatorial 30-60 day
Oscillation and the Arakawa-Schubert Penetrative Cumulus Parameterization,
J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 66, 883–901,
https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj1965.66.6_883, 1988.
Tompkins, A., Bechtold, P., Beljaars, A., Benedetti, A., Cheinet, S., Janiskova, M., Köhler, M., Lopez, P., and Morcrette, J.-J.: Moist physical processes in the IFS: Progress and Plans, Technical memorandum, https://doi.org/10.21957/dhtvdwsk, 2004.
Tompkins, A. M.: A Prognostic Parameterization for the Subgrid-Scale
Variability of Water Vapor and Clouds in Large-Scale Models and Its Use to
Diagnose Cloud Cover, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 1917–1942,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<1917:APPFTS>2.0.CO;2, 2002.
Tompkins, A. M. and Berner, J.: A stochastic convective approach to account
for model uncertainty due to unresolved humidity variability, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 113, D18101, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009284, 2008.
Trenberth, K. E.: Changes in precipitation with climate change, Clim. Res.,
47, 123–138, 2011.
Troen, I. B. and Mahrt, L.: A simple model of the atmospheric boundary
layer; sensitivity to surface evaporation, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 37,
129–148, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122760, 1986.
Turner, J. S.: The “starting plume” in neutral surroundings, J. Fluid Mech.,
13, 356–368, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112062000762, 1962.
Ushio, T. and Kachi, M.: Kalman Filtering Applications for Global Satellite
Mapping of Precipitation (GSMaP), in: Satellite Rainfall Applications for
Surface Hydrology, edited by: Gebremichael, M. and Hossain, F., Springer
Netherlands, Dordrecht, 105–123,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2915-7_7, 2010.
Vaidya, S. S. and Singh, S. S.: Thermodynamic Adjustment Parameters in the
Betts–Miller Scheme of Convection, Weather Forecast., 12, 819–825,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1997)012<0819:TAPITB>2.0.CO;2, 1997.
Vaidya, S. S. and Singh, S. S.: Applying the Betts–Miller–Janjić Scheme of
Convection in Prediction of the Indian Monsoon, Weather Forecast., 15,
349–356, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(2000)015<0349:ATBMJS>2.0.CO;2, 2000.
van den Heever, S. C. and Cotton, W. R.: Urban Aerosol Impacts on Downwind Convective Storms, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 46, 828–850, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2492.1, 2007.
van den Heever, S. C., Stephens, G. L., and Wood, N. B.: Aerosol Indirect Effects on Tropical Convection Characteristics under Conditions of Radiative–Convective Equilibrium, J. Atmos. Sci., 68, 699–718, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAS3603.1, 2011.
van Laar, T. W.: Spatial patterns in shallow cumulus cloud populations over a heterogeneous surface, text.thesis.doctoral, Universität zu Köln, http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/10221 (last access: 19 September 2021), 2019.
Vogelmann, A. M., McFarquhar, G. M., Ogren, J. A., Turner, D. D., Comstock,
J. M., Feingold, G., Long, C. N., Jonsson, H. H., Bucholtz, A., Collins, D.
R., Diskin, G. S., Gerber, H., Lawson, R. P., Woods, R. K., Andrews, E.,
Yang, H.-J., Chiu, J. C., Hartsock, D., Hubbe, J. M., Lo, C., Marshak, A.,
Monroe, J. W., McFarlane, S. A., Schmid, B., Tomlinson, J. M., and Toto, T.:
RACORO Extended-Term Aircraft Observations of Boundary Layer Clouds, B. Am.
Meteorol. Soc., 93, 861–878, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00189.1,
2012.
Volterra, V.: Variazioni e fluttuazioni del numero d'individui in specie
animali conviventi, Memoria della Reale Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, 2,
209, 1926.
von Salzen, K. and McFarlane, N. A.: Parameterization of the Bulk Effects of
Lateral and Cloud-Top Entrainment in Transient Shallow Cumulus Clouds,
Atmos. Sci., 59, 1405–1430,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<1405:POTBEO>2.0.CO;2, 2002.
Wagner, A., Heinzeller, D., Wagner, S., Rummler, T., and Kunstmann, H.:
Explicit Convection and Scale-Aware Cumulus Parameterizations:
High-Resolution Simulations over Areas of Different Topography in Germany,
Mon. Weather Rev., 146, 1925–1944, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-17-0238.1,
2018.
Wagner, T. J., Turner, D. D., Berg, L. K., and Krueger, S. K.: Ground-Based
Remote Retrievals of Cumulus Entrainment Rates, J. Atmos. Ocean Tech., 30,
1460–1471, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00187.1, 2013.
Wagner, T. M. and Graf, H.-F.: An Ensemble Cumulus Convection
Parameterization with Explicit Cloud Treatment, J. Atmos. Sci., 67,
3854–3869, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAS3485.1, 2010.
Walters, D., Baran, A. J., Boutle, I., Brooks, M., Earnshaw, P., Edwards, J., Furtado, K., Hill, P., Lock, A., Manners, J., Morcrette, C., Mulcahy, J., Sanchez, C., Smith, C., Stratton, R., Tennant, W., Tomassini, L., Van Weverberg, K., Vosper, S., Willett, M., Browse, J., Bushell, A., Carslaw, K., Dalvi, M., Essery, R., Gedney, N., Hardiman, S., Johnson, B., Johnson, C., Jones, A., Jones, C., Mann, G., Milton, S., Rumbold, H., Sellar, A., Ujiie, M., Whitall, M., Williams, K., and Zerroukat, M.: The Met Office Unified Model Global Atmosphere 7.0/7.1 and JULES Global Land 7.0 configurations, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1909–1963, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1909-2019, 2019.
Wang, W. and Schlesinger, M. E.: The Dependence on Convection
Parameterization of the Tropical Intraseasonal Oscillation Simulated by the
UIUC 11-Layer Atmospheric GCM, J. Climate, 12, 1423–1457,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<1423:TDOCPO>2.0.CO;2, 1999.
Wang, X. and Zhang, M.: An analysis of parameterization interactions and
sensitivity of single-column model simulations to convection schemes in CAM4
and CAM5, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 8869–8880,
https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50690, 2013.
Wang, X. and Zhang, M.: Vertical velocity in shallow convection for
different plume types, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 6, 478–489,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014MS000318, 2014.
Wang, Y., Zhou, L., and Hamilton, K.: Effect of Convective
Entrainment/Detrainment on the Simulation of the Tropical Precipitation
Diurnal Cycle, Mon. Weather Rev., 135, 567–585,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3308.1, 2007.
Wang, Y., Zhang, G. J., and Craig, G. C.: Stochastic convective
parameterization improving the simulation of tropical precipitation
variability in the NCAR CAM5, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 6612–6619,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069818, 2016.
Warner, J.: The Microstructure of Cumulus Cloud. Part III. The Nature of the
Updraft, J. Atmos. Sci., 27, 682–688,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1970)027<0682:TMOCCP>2.0.CO;2, 1970.
Watanabe, M., Emori, S., Satoh, M., and Miura, H.: A PDF-based hybrid
prognostic cloud scheme for general circulation models, Clim. Dynam., 33,
795–816, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-008-0489-0, 2009.
Watanabe, M., Suzuki, T., O'ishi, R., Komuro, Y., Watanabe, S., Emori, S.,
Takemura, T., Chikira, M., Ogura, T., Sekiguchi, M., Takata, K., Yamazaki,
D., Yokohata, T., Nozawa, T., Hasumi, H., Tatebe, H., and Kimoto, M.:
Improved Climate Simulation by MIROC5: Mean States, Variability, and Climate
Sensitivity, J. Climate, 23, 6312–6335,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3679.1, 2010.
Watanabe, S., Hajima, T., Sudo, K., Nagashima, T., Takemura, T., Okajima, H., Nozawa, T., Kawase, H., Abe, M., Yokohata, T., Ise, T., Sato, H., Kato, E., Takata, K., Emori, S., and Kawamiya, M.: MIROC-ESM 2010: model description and basic results of CMIP5-20c3m experiments, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 845–872, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-845-2011, 2011.
Wilcox, E. M. and Donner, L. J.: The Frequency of Extreme Rain Events in
Satellite Rain-Rate Estimates and an Atmospheric General Circulation Model,
J. Climate, 20, 53–69, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3987.1, 2007.
Willet, M. R. and Whitall, M. A.: A simple prognostic based convective
entrainment rate for the Unified Model: Description and tests, Met Office
internal) Forecasting Research Technical Reports617, 2017.
Witek, M. L., Teixeira, J., and Matheou, G.: An Integrated TKE-Based Eddy
Diffusivity/Mass Flux Boundary Layer Closure for the Dry Convective Boundary
Layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 68, 1526–1540,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JAS3548.1, 2011.
Woetzel, J., Pinner, D., Samandari, H., Engel, H., Krishnan, M., Boland, B.,
and Powis, C.: Climate and risk response: Physical hazars and socioeconomic
impacts, McKinsey Global Institute, 18, 164,
https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2018.1540343, 2020.
Wu, C.-M. and Arakawa, A.: A Unified Representation of Deep Moist Convection
in Numerical Modeling of the Atmosphere. Part II, J. Atmos. Sci., 71,
2089–2103, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-0382.1, 2014.
Wu, E., Yang, H., Kleissl, J., Suselj, K., Kurowski, M. J., and Teixeira,
J.: On the Parameterization of Convective Downdrafts for Marine
Stratocumulus Clouds, Mon. Weather Rev., 148, 1931–1950,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-19-0292.1, 2020.
Wu, L., Wong, S., Wang, T., and Huffman, G. J.: Moist convection: a key to
tropical wave–moisture interaction in Indian monsoon intraseasonal
oscillation, Clim. Dynam., 51, 3673–3684,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4103-9, 2018.
Wu, T.: A mass-flux cumulus parameterization scheme for large-scale models:
description and test with observations, Clim. Dynam., 38, 725–744,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-011-0995-3, 2012.
Wu, X., Deng, L., Song, X., Vettoretti, G., Peltier, W. R., and Zhang, G.
J.: Impact of a modified convective scheme on the Madden-Julian Oscillation
and El Niño–Southern Oscillation in a coupled climate model, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 34, L16823, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030637, 2007.
Wyant, M. C., Bretherton, C. S., Rand, H. A., and Stevens, D. E.: Numerical
Simulations and a Conceptual Model of the Stratocumulus to Trade Cumulus
Transition, J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 168–192,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1997)054<0168:NSAACM>2.0.CO;2, 1997.
Wyngaard, J. C.: Toward Numerical Modeling in the “Terra Incognita”, J.
Atmos. Sci., 61, 1816–1826,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<1816:TNMITT>2.0.CO;2, 2004.
Xie, P., Joyce, R., Wu, S., Yoo, S.-H., Yarosh, Y., Sun, F., and Lin, R.:
Reprocessed, Bias-Corrected CMORPH Global High-Resolution Precipitation
Estimates from 1998, J. Hydrometeorol., 18, 1617–1641,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-16-0168.1, 2017.
Xie, S. and Zhang, M.: Impact of the convection triggering function on
single-column model simulations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 14983–14996,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900170, 2000.
Xu, K.-M. and Randall, D. A.: A Semiempirical Cloudiness Parameterization
for Use in Climate Models, J. Atmos. Sci., 53, 3084–3102,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1996)053<3084:ASCPFU>2.0.CO;2, 1996.
Xu, K.-M., Cederwall, R. T., Donner, L. J., Grabowski, W. W., Guichard, F.,
Johnson, D. E., Khairoutdinov, M., Krueger, S. K., Petch, J. C., Randall, D.
A., Seman, C. J., Tao, W.-K., Wang, D., Xie, S. C., Yio, J. J., and Zhang,
M.-H.: An intercomparison of cloud-resolving models with the atmospheric
radiation measurement summer 1997 intensive observation period data, Q. J.
Roy. Meteor. Soc., 128, 593–624,
https://doi.org/10.1256/003590002321042117, 2002.
Yanai, M., Esbensen, S., and Chu, J.-H.: Determination of Bulk Properties of
Tropical Cloud Clusters from Large-Scale Heat and Moisture Budgets, J.
Atmos. Sci., 30, 611–627,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1973)030<0611:DOBPOT>2.0.CO;2, 1973.
Yang, G.-Y. and Slingo, J.: The Diurnal Cycle in the Tropics, Mon. Weather Rev., 129, 784–801, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0784:TDCITT>2.0.CO;2, 2001.
Yano, J., Bénard, P., Couvreux, F., and Lahellec, A.: NAM–SCA: A Nonhydrostatic Anelastic Model with Segmentally Constant Approximations, Mon. Weather Rev., 138, 1957–1974, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009MWR2997.1, 2010.
Yano, J. I.: Formulation structure of the mass-flux convection parameterization, Dynam. Atmos. Oceans, 67, 1–28, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2014.04.002, 2014.
Yano, J.-I. and Baizig, H.: Single SCA-plume dynamics, Dynam. Atmos. Oceans,
58, 62–94, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2012.09.001, 2012.
Yano, J.-I. and Plant, R.: Finite departure from convective
quasi-equilibrium: periodic cycle and discharge–recharge mechanism, Q. J.
Roy. Meteor. Soc., 138, 626–637, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.957, 2012a.
Yano, J.-I. and Plant, R. S.: Convective quasi-equilibrium, Rev. Geophys.,
50, RG4004, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011RG000378, 2012b.
Yano, J.-I., Bister, M., Fuchs, Ž., Gerard, L., Phillips, V. T. J., Barkidija, S., and Piriou, J.-M.: Phenomenology of convection-parameterization closure, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4111–4131, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4111-2013, 2013.
Zhang, C., Wang, Y., and Hamilton, K.: Improved Representation of Boundary
Layer Clouds over the Southeast Pacific in ARW-WRF Using a Modified Tiedtke
Cumulus Parameterization Scheme, Mon. Weather Rev., 139, 3489–3513,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-10-05091.1, 2011.
Zhang, D.-L. and Fritsch, J. M.: Numerical Simulation of the Meso-β
Scale Structure and Evolution of the 1977 Johnstown Flood. Part I: Model
Description and Verification, J. Atmos. Sci., 43, 1913–1944,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1986)043<1913:NSOTMS>2.0.CO;2, 1986.
Zhang, G. J.: Convective quasi-equilibrium in midlatitude continental
environment and its effect on convective parameterization, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 107, ACL 12-1–ACL 12-16, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001005,
2002.
Zhang, G. J.: Convective quasi-equilibrium in the tropical western Pacific:
Comparison with midlatitude continental environment, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 108, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003520, 2003a.
Zhang, G. J.: Roles of tropospheric and boundary layer forcing in the
diurnal cycle of convection in the U.S. southern great plains, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 30, 2281, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018554, 2003b.
Zhang, G. J.: Effects of entrainment on convective available potential
energy and closure assumptions in convection parameterization, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 114, D07109, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010976, 2009.
Zhang, G. J. and McFarlane, N. A.: Sensitivity of climate simulations to the
parameterization of cumulus convection in the Canadian climate centre
general circulation model, Atmosphere-Ocean, 33, 407–446,
https://doi.org/10.1080/07055900.1995.9649539, 1995.
Zhang, G. J. and Mu, M.: Effects of modifications to the Zhang-McFarlane
convection parameterization on the simulation of the tropical precipitation
in the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model,
version 3, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D09109,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005617, 2005a.
Zhang, G. J. and Mu, M.: Simulation of the Madden–Julian Oscillation in the
NCAR CCM3 Using a Revised Zhang–McFarlane Convection Parameterization
Scheme, J. Climate, 18, 4046–4064, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3508.1,
2005b.
Zhang, G. J. and Song, X.: Convection Parameterization, Tropical Pacific
Double ITCZ, and Upper-Ocean Biases in the NCAR CCSM3. Part II: Coupled
Feedback and the Role of Ocean Heat Transport, J. Climate, 23, 800–812,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI3109.1, 2010.
Zhang, G. J. and Song, X.: Parameterization of Microphysical Processes in
Convective Clouds in Global Climate Models, Meteor. Mon., 56, 12.1–12.18,
https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-15-0015.1, 2016.
Zhang, G. J. and Wang, H.: Toward mitigating the double ITCZ problem in NCAR
CCSM3, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L06709, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025229, 2006.
Zhang, J., Lohmann, U., and Stier, P.: A microphysical parameterization for
convective clouds in the ECHAM5 climate model: Single-column model results
evaluated at the Oklahoma Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program site, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D15S07, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005128, 2005.
Zhang, Z., Tallapragada, V., Kieu, C., Trahan, S., and Wang, W.: HWRF Based
Ensemble Prediction System Using Perturbations from GEFS and Stochastic
Convective Trigger Function, Tropical Cyclone Research and Review, 3,
145–161, https://doi.org/10.6057/2014TCRR03.02, 2014.
Zhao, M.: An Investigation of the Connections among Convection, Clouds, and
Climate Sensitivity in a Global Climate Model, J. Climate, 27, 1845–1862,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00145.1, 2014.
Zhao, M. and Austin, P. H.: Life Cycle of Numerically Simulated Shallow
Cumulus Clouds. Part II: Mixing Dynamics, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 1291–1310,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3415.1, 2005.
Zhao, M., Golaz, J.-C., Held, I. M., Guo, H., Balaji, V., Benson, R., Chen,
J.-H., Chen, X., Donner, L. J., Dunne, J. P., Dunne, K., Durachta, J., Fan,
S.-M., Freidenreich, S. M., Garner, S. T., Ginoux, P., Harris, L. M.,
Horowitz, L. W., Krasting, J. P., Langenhorst, A. R., Liang, Z., Lin, P.,
Lin, S.-J., Malyshev, S. L., Mason, E., Milly, P. C. D., Ming, Y., Naik, V.,
Paulot, F., Paynter, D., Phillipps, P., Radhakrishnan, A., Ramaswamy, V.,
Robinson, T., Schwarzkopf, D., Seman, C. J., Shevliakova, E., Shen, Z.,
Shin, H., Silvers, L. G., Wilson, J. R., Winton, M., Wittenberg, A. T.,
Wyman, B., and Xiang, B.: The GFDL Global Atmosphere and Land Model
AM4.0/LM4.0: 2. Model Description, Sensitivity Studies, and Tuning
Strategies, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 10, 735–769,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS001209, 2018.
Zheng, Y., Alapaty, K., Herwehe, J. A., Del Genio, A. D., and Niyogi, D.:
Improving High-Resolution Weather Forecasts Using the Weather Research and
Forecasting (WRF) Model with an Updated Kain–Fritsch Scheme, Mon. Weather Rev., 144, 833–860, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0005.1, 2016.
Zheng, Y., Rosenfeld, D., and Li, Z.: Sub-Cloud Turbulence Explains
Cloud-Base Updrafts for Shallow Cumulus Ensembles: First Observational
Evidence, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2020GL091881,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091881, 2021.
Zhu, H., Hendon, H., and Jakob, C.: Convection in a Parameterized and
Superparameterized Model and Its Role in the Representation of the MJO, J.
Atmos. Sci., 66, 2796–2811, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAS3097.1, 2009.
Zimmer, M., Craig, G. C., Keil, C., and Wernli, H.: Classification of
precipitation events with a convective response timescale and their
forecasting characteristics, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L05802,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046199, 2011.
Zou, L., Qian, Y., Zhou, T., and Yang, B.: Parameter Tuning and Calibration
of RegCM3 with MIT–Emanuel Cumulus Parameterization Scheme over CORDEX East
Asia Domain, J. Climate, 27, 7687–7701,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00229.1, 2014.
Short summary
The paper provides a comprehensive review of the empirical values and assumptions used in the convection schemes of numerical models. The focus is on the values and assumptions used in the activation of convection (trigger), the transport and microphysics (commonly referred to as the cloud model), and the intensity of convection (closure). Such information can assist satellite missions focused on elucidating convective processes and the evaluation of model output uncertainties.
The paper provides a comprehensive review of the empirical values and assumptions used in the...
