Articles | Volume 10, issue 2
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 765–789, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-765-2017
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 765–789, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-765-2017

Model description paper 17 Feb 2017

Model description paper | 17 Feb 2017

The Finite-volumE Sea ice–Ocean Model (FESOM2)

Sergey Danilov et al.

Related authors

Assessment of the Finite VolumE Sea Ice Ocean Model (FESOM2.0), Part II: Partial bottom cells, embedded sea ice and vertical mixing library CVMIX
Patrick Scholz, Dmitry Sidorenko, Sergey Danilov, Qiang Wang, Nikolay Koldunov, Dmitry Sein, and Thomas Jung
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2021-94,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2021-94, 2021
Preprint under review for GMD
Short summary
Lasting impact of winds on Arctic sea ice through the ocean's memory
Qiang Wang, Sergey Danilov, Longjiang Mu, Dmitry Sidorenko, and Claudia Wekerle
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2021-50,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2021-50, 2021
Revised manuscript under review for TC
Short summary
Plume spreading test case for coastal ocean models
Vera Fofonova, Tuomas Kärnä, Knut Klingbeil, Alexey Androsov, Ivan Kuznetsov, Dmitry Sidorenko, Sergey Danilov, Hans Burchard, and Karen Helen Wiltshire
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-438,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-438, 2021
Revised manuscript under review for GMD
Short summary
Properties and dynamics of mesoscale eddies in Fram Strait from a comparison between two high-resolution ocean–sea ice models
Claudia Wekerle, Tore Hattermann, Qiang Wang, Laura Crews, Wilken-Jon von Appen, and Sergey Danilov
Ocean Sci., 16, 1225–1246, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-16-1225-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/os-16-1225-2020, 2020
Short summary
Evaluation of global ocean–sea-ice model simulations based on the experimental protocols of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (OMIP-2)
Hiroyuki Tsujino, L. Shogo Urakawa, Stephen M. Griffies, Gokhan Danabasoglu, Alistair J. Adcroft, Arthur E. Amaral, Thomas Arsouze, Mats Bentsen, Raffaele Bernardello, Claus W. Böning, Alexandra Bozec, Eric P. Chassignet, Sergey Danilov, Raphael Dussin, Eleftheria Exarchou, Pier Giuseppe Fogli, Baylor Fox-Kemper, Chuncheng Guo, Mehmet Ilicak, Doroteaciro Iovino, Who M. Kim, Nikolay Koldunov, Vladimir Lapin, Yiwen Li, Pengfei Lin, Keith Lindsay, Hailong Liu, Matthew C. Long, Yoshiki Komuro, Simon J. Marsland, Simona Masina, Aleksi Nummelin, Jan Klaus Rieck, Yohan Ruprich-Robert, Markus Scheinert, Valentina Sicardi, Dmitry Sidorenko, Tatsuo Suzuki, Hiroaki Tatebe, Qiang Wang, Stephen G. Yeager, and Zipeng Yu
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3643–3708, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3643-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3643-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Oceanography
A discrete interaction numerical model for coagulation and fragmentation of marine detritic particulate matter (Coagfrag v.1)
Gwenaëlle Gremion, Louis-Philippe Nadeau, Christiane Dufresne, Irene R. Schloss, Philippe Archambault, and Dany Dumont
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 4535–4554, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4535-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4535-2021, 2021
Short summary
Parallel computing efficiency of SWAN 40.91
Christo Rautenbach, Julia C. Mullarney, and Karin R. Bryan
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 4241–4247, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4241-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4241-2021, 2021
Short summary
Integrating CVMix into GOTM (v6.0): a consistent framework for testing, comparing, and applying ocean mixing schemes
Qing Li, Jorn Bruggeman, Hans Burchard, Knut Klingbeil, Lars Umlauf, and Karsten Bolding
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 4261–4282, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4261-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4261-2021, 2021
Short summary
A NEMO-based model of Sargassum distribution in the tropical Atlantic: description of the model and sensitivity analysis (NEMO-Sarg1.0)
Julien Jouanno, Rachid Benshila, Léo Berline, Antonin Soulié, Marie-Hélène Radenac, Guillaume Morvan, Frédéric Diaz, Julio Sheinbaum, Cristele Chevalier, Thierry Thibaut, Thomas Changeux, Frédéric Menard, Sarah Berthet, Olivier Aumont, Christian Ethé, Pierre Nabat, and Marc Mallet
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 4069–4086, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4069-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4069-2021, 2021
Short summary
Evaluating the physical and biogeochemical state of the global ocean component of UKESM1 in CMIP6 historical simulations
Andrew Yool, Julien Palmiéri, Colin G. Jones, Lee de Mora, Till Kuhlbrodt, Ekatarina E. Popova, A. J. George Nurser, Joel Hirschi, Adam T. Blaker, Andrew C. Coward, Edward W. Blockley, and Alistair A. Sellar
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3437–3472, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3437-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3437-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Adcroft, A. and Hallberg, R.: On methods for solving the oceanic equations of motion in generalized vertical coordinates, Ocean Model., 11, 224–233, 2006.
Blazek, J.: Computational fluid dynamics: Principles and applications, Elsevier Ltd., 2001.
Campin, J.-M., Adcroft, A., Hill, C., and Marshall, J.: Conservation of properties in a free-surface model, Ocean Model., 6, 221–244, 2004.
Chen, C., Liu, H., and Beardsley, R. C.: An unstructured, finite volume, three-dimensional, primitive equation ocean model: application to coastal ocean and estuaries, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 20, 159–186, 2003.
Colella, P. and Woodward, P. R.: The piecewise parabolic method (PPM) for gas-dynamical simulations, J. Comput. Phys., 54, 174–201, 1984.
Download
Short summary
Numerical models of global ocean circulation are used to learn about future climate. The ocean circulation is characterized by processes on different spatial scales which are still beyond the reach of present computers. We describe a new model setup that allows one to vary a model's spatial resolution and hence focus the computational power on regional dynamics, reaching a better description of local processes in areas of interest.