Articles | Volume 5, issue 3
Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 611–618, 2012
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-611-2012
Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 611–618, 2012
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-611-2012

Methods for assessment of models 11 May 2012

Methods for assessment of models | 11 May 2012

The ACCENT-protocol: a framework for benchmarking and model evaluation

V. Grewe et al.

Related subject area

Climate and Earth System Modeling
Development of four-dimensional variational assimilation system based on the GRAPES–CUACE adjoint model (GRAPES–CUACE-4D-Var V1.0) and its application in emission inversion
Chao Wang, Xingqin An, Qing Hou, Zhaobin Sun, Yanjun Li, and Jiangtao Li
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 337–350, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-337-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-337-2021, 2021
HIRM v1.0: a hybrid impulse response model for climate modeling and uncertainty analyses
Kalyn Dorheim, Steven J. Smith, and Ben Bond-Lamberty
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 365–375, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-365-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-365-2021, 2021
Short summary
CLIMADA v1.4.1: towards a globally consistent adaptation options appraisal tool
David N. Bresch and Gabriela Aznar-Siguan
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 351–363, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-351-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-351-2021, 2021
Short summary
FORTE 2.0: a fast, parallel and flexible coupled climate model
Adam T. Blaker, Manoj Joshi, Bablu Sinha, David P. Stevens, Robin S. Smith, and Joël J.-M. Hirschi
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 275–293, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-275-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-275-2021, 2021
Short summary
Optimization of the sulfate aerosol hygroscopicity parameter in WRF-Chem
Ah-Hyun Kim, Seong Soo Yum, Dong Yeong Chang, and Minsu Park
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 259–273, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-259-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-259-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

ACCENT (Atmospheric Composition Change the European Network of Excellence): Answers to the Urbino Questions, ACCENTs first policy-driven synthesis, edited by: Raes F. and Hjorth J., published by: ACCENT Secretariat, University Urbino, Italy, ISBN 92-79-02413-2, http://www4.nilu.no/portal/publications/accent-series-reports, 2006.
ACCENT (Atmospheric Composition Change the European Network of Excellence): Editorial, edited by: Fuzzi, S. and Maione, M., Atmos. Environm., 43, 5136–5137, 2009.
Aghedo, A. M., Bowman, K. W., Shindell, D. T., and Faluvegi, G.: The impact of orbital sampling, monthly averaging and vertical resolution on climate chemistry model evaluation with satellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6493–6514, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6493-2011, 2011.
AIAA (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics): Guide for the Verification and Validation of Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, AIAA-G-077-1998, Reston, VA, USA, 1998.
Braesicke, P. and Pyle, J.: Sensitivity of dynmaics and ozone to different representations of SSTs in the Unified Model, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 130, 2033–2045, 2004.