Articles | Volume 15, issue 14
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5829–5856, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5829-2022
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5829–5856, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5829-2022
Methods for assessment of models
27 Jul 2022
Methods for assessment of models | 27 Jul 2022

Cloud-based framework for inter-comparing submesoscale-permitting realistic ocean models

Takaya Uchida et al.

Related authors

A global Lagrangian eddy dataset based on satellite altimetry
Tongya Liu and Ryan Abernathey
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2022-411,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2022-411, 2022
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Ensemble quantification of short-term predictability of the ocean dynamics at a kilometric-scale resolution: a Western Mediterranean test case
Stephanie Leroux, Jean-Michel Brankart, Aurélie Albert, Laurent Brodeau, Jean-Marc Molines, Quentin Jamet, Julien Le Sommer, Thierry Penduff, and Pierre Brasseur
Ocean Sci., 18, 1619–1644, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-1619-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-1619-2022, 2022
Short summary
Arctic Ocean Simulations in the CMIP6 Ocean Model Intercomparison Project (OMIP)
Qi Shu, Qiang Wang, Chuncheng Guo, Zhenya Song, Shizhu Wang, Yan He, and Fangli Qiao
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-260,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-260, 2022
Preprint under review for GMD
Short summary
The role of oceanic heat flux in reducing thermodynamic ice growth in Nares Strait and promoting earlier collapse of the ice bridge
Sergei Kirillov, Igor Dmitrenko, David G. Babb, Jens K. Ehn, Nikolay Koldunov, Søren Rysgaard, David Jensen, and David G. Barber
Ocean Sci., 18, 1535–1557, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-1535-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-1535-2022, 2022
Short summary
Validating the spatial variability of the semidiurnal internal tide in a realistic global ocean simulation with Argo and mooring data
Gaspard Geoffroy, Jonas Nycander, Maarten C. Buijsman, Jay F. Shriver, and Brian K. Arbic
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1085,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1085, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Climate and Earth system modeling
stoPET v1.0: a stochastic potential evapotranspiration generator for simulation of climate change impacts
Dagmawi Teklu Asfaw, Michael Bliss Singer, Rafael Rosolem, David MacLeod, Mark Cuthbert, Edisson Quichimbo Miguitama, Manuel F. Rios Gaona, and Katerina Michaelides
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 557–571, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-557-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-557-2023, 2023
Short summary
URANOS v1.0 – the Ultra Rapid Adaptable Neutron-Only Simulation for Environmental Research
Markus Köhli, Martin Schrön, Steffen Zacharias, and Ulrich Schmidt
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 449–477, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-449-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-449-2023, 2023
Short summary
Combining regional mesh refinement with vertically enhanced physics to target marine stratocumulus biases as demonstrated in the Energy Exascale Earth System Model version 1
Peter A. Bogenschutz, Hsiang-He Lee, Qi Tang, and Takanobu Yamaguchi
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 335–352, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-335-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-335-2023, 2023
Short summary
Evaluation of native Earth system model output with ESMValTool v2.6.0
Manuel Schlund, Birgit Hassler, Axel Lauer, Bouwe Andela, Patrick Jöckel, Rémi Kazeroni, Saskia Loosveldt Tomas, Brian Medeiros, Valeriu Predoi, Stéphane Sénési, Jérôme Servonnat, Tobias Stacke, Javier Vegas-Regidor, Klaus Zimmermann, and Veronika Eyring
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 315–333, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-315-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-315-2023, 2023
Short summary
WRF–ML v1.0: a bridge between WRF v4.3 and machine learning parameterizations and its application to atmospheric radiative transfer
Xiaohui Zhong, Zhijian Ma, Yichen Yao, Lifei Xu, Yuan Wu, and Zhibin Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 199–209, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-199-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-199-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Abernathey, R. P.: Petabytes of Ocean Data, Part I: NASA ECCO Data Portal, https://medium.com/pangeo/petabytes-of-ocean-data-part-1-nasa-ecco-data-portal-81e3c5e077be (last access: 8 July 2022), 2019. a, b
Abernathey, R. P.: fastjmd95: Numba implementation of Jackett & McDougall (1995) ocean equation of state, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4498376, 2020. a
Abernathey, R. P., Augspurger, T., Banihirwe, A., Blackmon-Luca, C. C., Crone, T. J., Gentemann, C. L., Hamman, J. J., Henderson, N., Lepore, C., McCaie, T. A., Robinson, N. H., and Signell, R. P.: Cloud-Native Repositories for Big Scientific Data, Comput. Sci. Eng., 23, 26–35, https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2021.3059437, 2021a. a, b
Abernathey, R. P., Busecke, J., Smith, T., et al.: xgcm: General Circulation Model Postprocessing with xarray, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3634752, 2021b. a, b
Abernathey, R. P., Dougie, S., Nicholas, T., Bourbeau, J., Joseph, G., Yunyi, Y., Bailey, S., Bell, R., and Spring, A.: xhistogram: Fast, flexible, label-aware histograms for numpy and xarray, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5757149, 2021c. a
Download
Short summary
Ocean and climate scientists have used numerical simulations as a tool to examine the ocean and climate system since the 1970s. Since then, owing to the continuous increase in computational power and advances in numerical methods, we have been able to simulate increasing complex phenomena. However, the fidelity of the simulations in representing the phenomena remains a core issue in the ocean science community. Here we propose a cloud-based framework to inter-compare and assess such simulations.