Articles | Volume 14, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4509-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4509-2021
Development and technical paper
 | 
22 Jul 2021
Development and technical paper |  | 22 Jul 2021

Development of a moving point source model for shipping emission dispersion modeling in EPISODE–CityChem v1.3

Kang Pan, Mei Qi Lim, Markus Kraft, and Epaminondas Mastorakos

Related authors

Advances in characterization of black carbon particles and their associated coatings using the soot particle aerosol mass spectrometer in Singapore, a complex city environment
Mutian Ma, Laura-Hélèna Rivellini, Yichen Zong, Markus Kraft, Liya E. Yu, and Alex King Yin Lee
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3240,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3240, 2024
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary

Related subject area

Numerical methods
The Measurement Error Proxy System Model: MEPSM v0.2
Matt J. Fischer
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6745–6760, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6745-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6745-2024, 2024
Short summary
Numerical stabilization methods for level-set-based ice front migration
Gong Cheng, Mathieu Morlighem, and G. Hilmar Gudmundsson
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6227–6247, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6227-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6227-2024, 2024
Short summary
Modelling chemical advection during magma ascent
Hugo Dominguez, Nicolas Riel, and Pierre Lanari
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6105–6122, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6105-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6105-2024, 2024
Short summary
Consistent point data assimilation in Firedrake and Icepack
Reuben W. Nixon-Hill, Daniel Shapero, Colin J. Cotter, and David A. Ham
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5369–5386, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5369-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5369-2024, 2024
Short summary
A Joint Reconstruction and Model Selection Approach for Large Scale Inverse Modeling
Malena Sabaté Landman, Julianne Chung, Jiahua Jiang, Scot Miller, and Arvind Saibaba
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-90,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-90, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary

Cited articles

Abrutytė, E., Žukauskaitė, A., Mickevičienė, R., Zabukas, V., and Paulauskienė, T.: Evaluation of NOx emission and dispersion from marine ships in Klaipeda sea port, J. Environ. Eng. Landsc., 22, 264–273, 2014. a, b
Asariotis, R., Assaf, M., Ayala, G., Benamara, H., Chantrel, D., Hoffmann, J., Premti, A., Rodriguez, L., and Youssef, F.: Review of Maritime Transport 2019, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), Tech. rep., 2019. a
Bluett, J., Gimson, N., Fisher, G., Heydenrych, C., Freeman, T., and Godfrey, J.: Good practice guide for atmospheric dispersion modelling, Ministry for the Environment, Wellington, New Zealand, 2004. a, b
Briggs, G. A.: Plume rise, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC critical review series), Oak Ridge Tennessee, 1969. a
Briggs, G. A.: Some recent analyses of plume rise observations, in: Proceedings of the Second International Clean Air Congress, edited by: Englund, H. M. and Berry, W. T., Academic Press, New York, 1029–1032, 1971. a
Download
Short summary
A new moving point source (MPS) model was developed to simulate the dispersion of emissions generated by the moving ships. Compared to the commonly used line source (LS) or fixed point source (FPS) model, the MPS model provides more emission distribution details generated by the moving ships and matches reasonably with the measurements. Therefore, the MPS model should be a valuable alternative for the environmental society to evaluate the pollutant dispersion contributed from the moving ships.