Articles | Volume 12, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-69-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-69-2019
Development and technical paper
 | 
03 Jan 2019
Development and technical paper |  | 03 Jan 2019

RandomFront 2.3: a physical parameterisation of fire spotting for operational fire spread models – implementation in WRF-SFIRE and response analysis with LSFire+

Andrea Trucchia, Vera Egorova, Anton Butenko, Inderpreet Kaur, and Gianni Pagnini

Related subject area

Climate and Earth system modeling
Yeti 1.0: a generalized framework for constructing bottom-up emission inventories from traffic sources at road-link resolutions
Edward C. Chan, Joana Leitão, Andreas Kerschbaumer, and Timothy M. Butler
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1427–1444, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1427-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1427-2023, 2023
Short summary
Analysis of systematic biases in tropospheric hydrostatic delay models and construction of a correction model
Haopeng Fan, Siran Li, Zhongmiao Sun, Guorui Xiao, Xinxing Li, and Xiaogang Liu
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1345–1358, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1345-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1345-2023, 2023
Short summary
A new precipitation emulator (PREMU v1.0) for lower-complexity models
Gang Liu, Shushi Peng, Chris Huntingford, and Yi Xi
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1277–1296, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1277-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1277-2023, 2023
Short summary
Simulating marine neodymium isotope distributions using Nd v1.0 coupled to the ocean component of the FAMOUS–MOSES1 climate model: sensitivities to reversible scavenging efficiency and benthic source distributions
Suzanne Robinson, Ruza F. Ivanovic, Lauren J. Gregoire, Julia Tindall, Tina van de Flierdt, Yves Plancherel, Frerk Pöppelmeier, Kazuyo Tachikawa, and Paul J. Valdes
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1231–1264, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1231-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1231-2023, 2023
Short summary
CMIP6 simulations with the compact Earth system model OSCAR v3.1
Yann Quilcaille, Thomas Gasser, Philippe Ciais, and Olivier Boucher
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1129–1161, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1129-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1129-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Albini, F. A.: Spot fire distance from burning trees: a predictive model, Technical Report INT-56, U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, 1979.
Albini, F. A.: Potential Spotting Distance from Wind-Driven Surface Fires, Research Paper INT-309, U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, 1983.
Alexander, M. E.: Calculating and interpreting forest fire intensities, Can. J. Bot., 60, 349–357, 1982.
Anderson, H. E.: Aids to determining fuel models for estimating fire behavior. General Technical Report INT-122, Tech. rep., Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT, 1982.
Andrews, P. and Chase, C.: BEHAVE: Fire behavior prediction and fuel modeling system: BURN subsystem, part 2, Research Paper INT-260, USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, Utah 84401, 1989.
Download
Short summary
Wildfires are a concrete problem and impact on human life, property and the environment. An extremely dangerous phenomenon is so-called fire spotting, i.e., the generation of secondary ignitions responsible for dangerous flare-ups during wildfires. The aim of this research was to improve the tools used for risk management through the inclusion of fire spotting in operational wildfire simulators used by forest service agencies.