Articles | Volume 17, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1869-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1869-2024
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
29 Feb 2024
Methods for assessment of models |  | 29 Feb 2024

Accurate assessment of land–atmosphere coupling in climate models requires high-frequency data output

Kirsten L. Findell, Zun Yin, Eunkyo Seo, Paul A. Dirmeyer, Nathan P. Arnold, Nathaniel Chaney, Megan D. Fowler, Meng Huang, David M. Lawrence, Po-Lun Ma, and Joseph A. Santanello Jr.

Related authors

Daytime-only mean data enhance understanding of land–atmosphere coupling
Zun Yin, Kirsten L. Findell, Paul Dirmeyer, Elena Shevliakova, Sergey Malyshev, Khaled Ghannam, Nina Raoult, and Zhihong Tan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 861–872, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-861-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-861-2023, 2023
Short summary
The Budyko and complementary relationships in an idealized model of large-scale land–atmosphere coupling
B. R. Lintner, P. Gentine, K. L. Findell, and G. D. Salvucci
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 2119–2131, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-2119-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-2119-2015, 2015
Land-surface controls on afternoon precipitation diagnosed from observational data: uncertainties and confounding factors
B. P. Guillod, B. Orlowsky, D. Miralles, A. J. Teuling, P. D. Blanken, N. Buchmann, P. Ciais, M. Ek, K. L. Findell, P. Gentine, B. R. Lintner, R. L. Scott, B. Van den Hurk, and S. I. Seneviratne
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 8343–8367, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8343-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8343-2014, 2014

Related subject area

Climate and Earth system modeling
DiuSST: a conceptual model of diurnal warm layers for idealized atmospheric simulations with interactive sea surface temperature
Reyk Börner, Jan O. Haerter, and Romain Fiévet
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1333–1356, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1333-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1333-2025, 2025
Short summary
High-Resolution Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (HighResMIP2) towards CMIP7
Malcolm J. Roberts, Kevin A. Reed, Qing Bao, Joseph J. Barsugli, Suzana J. Camargo, Louis-Philippe Caron, Ping Chang, Cheng-Ta Chen, Hannah M. Christensen, Gokhan Danabasoglu, Ivy Frenger, Neven S. Fučkar, Shabeh ul Hasson, Helene T. Hewitt, Huanping Huang, Daehyun Kim, Chihiro Kodama, Michael Lai, Lai-Yung Ruby Leung, Ryo Mizuta, Paulo Nobre, Pablo Ortega, Dominique Paquin, Christopher D. Roberts, Enrico Scoccimarro, Jon Seddon, Anne Marie Treguier, Chia-Ying Tu, Paul A. Ullrich, Pier Luigi Vidale, Michael F. Wehner, Colin M. Zarzycki, Bosong Zhang, Wei Zhang, and Ming Zhao
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1307–1332, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1307-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1307-2025, 2025
Short summary
T&C-CROP: representing mechanistic crop growth with a terrestrial biosphere model (T&C, v1.5) – model formulation and validation
Jordi Buckley Paules, Simone Fatichi, Bonnie Warring, and Athanasios Paschalis
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1287–1305, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1287-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1287-2025, 2025
Short summary
An updated non-intrusive, multi-scale, and flexible coupling interface in WRF 4.6.0
Sébastien Masson, Swen Jullien, Eric Maisonnave, David Gill, Guillaume Samson, Mathieu Le Corre, and Lionel Renault
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1241–1263, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1241-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1241-2025, 2025
Short summary
Monitoring and benchmarking Earth system model simulations with ESMValTool v2.12.0
Axel Lauer, Lisa Bock, Birgit Hassler, Patrick Jöckel, Lukas Ruhe, and Manuel Schlund
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1169–1188, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1169-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1169-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Alizadeh, M. R., Adamowski, J., Nikoo, M. R., AghaKouchak, A., Dennison, P., and Sadegh, M.: A century of observations reveals increasing likelihood of continental-scale compound dry-hot extremes, Sci. Adv., 6, eaaz4571, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz4571, 2020. 
Benson, D. O. and Dirmeyer, P. A.: Characterizing the relationship between temperature and soil moisture extremes and their role in the exacerbation of heatwaves over the contiguous United States, J. Climate, 34, 2175–2187, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0440.1, 2021. 
Benson, D. O. and Dirmeyer, P. A.: The soil moisture – surface flux relationship as a factor for extreme heat predictability in subseasonal to seasonal forecasts, J. Climate, 36, 6375–6392, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-22-0447.1, 2023. 
Berg, A., Findell, K. L., Lintner, B. R., Gentine, P., and Kerr, C.: Precipitation sensitivity to surface heat fluxes over North America in reanalysis and model data. J. Hydrometeorol., 14, 722–743, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-12-0111.1, 2013. 
Berg, A., Lintner, B. R., Findell, K. L., and Giannini, A.: Soil Moisture Influence on Seasonality and Large-Scale Circulation in Simulations of the West African Monsoon, J. Climate, 30, 2295–2317, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0877.1, 2017. 
Download
Short summary
We outline a request for sub-daily data to accurately capture the process-level connections between land states, surface fluxes, and the boundary layer response. This high-frequency model output will allow for more direct comparison with observational field campaigns on process-relevant timescales, enable demonstration of inter-model spread in land–atmosphere coupling processes, and aid in targeted identification of sources of deficiencies and opportunities for improvement of the models.
Share