Articles | Volume 17, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4095-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4095-2024
Model evaluation paper
 | 
26 May 2024
Model evaluation paper |  | 26 May 2024

Comparison of the Coastal and Regional Ocean COmmunity model (CROCO) and NCAR-LES in non-hydrostatic simulations

Xiaoyu Fan, Baylor Fox-Kemper, Nobuhiro Suzuki, Qing Li, Patrick Marchesiello, Peter P. Sullivan, and Paul S. Hall

Related authors

CMIP7 Data Request: Ocean and Sea Ice Priorities and Opportunities
Baylor Fox-Kemper, Patricia DeRepentigny, Anne Marie Treguier, Christian Stepanek, Eleanor O’Rourke, Chloe Mackallah, Alberto Meucci, Yevgeny Aksenov, Paul J. Durack, Nicole Feldl, Vanessa Hernaman, Céline Heuzé, Doroteaciro Iovino, Gaurav Madan, André L. Marquez, François Massonnet, Jenny Mecking, Dhrubajyoti Samanta, Patrick C. Taylor, Wan-Ling Tseng, and Martin Vancoppenolle
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3083,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3083, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
ISEFlow v1.0: A Flow-Based Neural Network Emulator for Improved Sea Level Projections and Uncertainty Quantification
Peter Van Katwyk, Baylor Fox-Kemper, Sophie Nowicki, Hélène Seroussi, and Karianne J. Bergen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-870,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-870, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Impact of increased resolution on Arctic Ocean simulations in Ocean Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (OMIP-2)
Qiang Wang, Qi Shu, Alexandra Bozec, Eric P. Chassignet, Pier Giuseppe Fogli, Baylor Fox-Kemper, Andy McC. Hogg, Doroteaciro Iovino, Andrew E. Kiss, Nikolay Koldunov, Julien Le Sommer, Yiwen Li, Pengfei Lin, Hailong Liu, Igor Polyakov, Patrick Scholz, Dmitry Sidorenko, Shizhu Wang, and Xiaobiao Xu
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 347–379, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-347-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-347-2024, 2024
Short summary
The mixed-layer depth in the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project (OMIP): impact of resolving mesoscale eddies
Anne Marie Treguier, Clement de Boyer Montégut, Alexandra Bozec, Eric P. Chassignet, Baylor Fox-Kemper, Andy McC. Hogg, Doroteaciro Iovino, Andrew E. Kiss, Julien Le Sommer, Yiwen Li, Pengfei Lin, Camille Lique, Hailong Liu, Guillaume Serazin, Dmitry Sidorenko, Qiang Wang, Xiaobio Xu, and Steve Yeager
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3849–3872, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3849-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3849-2023, 2023
Short summary
NeverWorld2: an idealized model hierarchy to investigate ocean mesoscale eddies across resolutions
Gustavo M. Marques, Nora Loose, Elizabeth Yankovsky, Jacob M. Steinberg, Chiung-Yin Chang, Neeraja Bhamidipati, Alistair Adcroft, Baylor Fox-Kemper, Stephen M. Griffies, Robert W. Hallberg, Malte F. Jansen, Hemant Khatri, and Laure Zanna
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6567–6579, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6567-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6567-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Oceanography
PIBM 1.0: an individual-based model for simulating phytoplankton acclimation, diversity, and evolution in the ocean
Iria Sala and Bingzhang Chen
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4155–4182, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4155-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4155-2025, 2025
Short summary
An effective communication topology for performance optimization: a case study of the finite-volume wave modeling (FVWAM)
Renbo Pang, Fujiang Yu, Yuanyong Gao, Ye Yuan, Liang Yuan, and Zhiyi Gao
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4119–4136, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4119-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4119-2025, 2025
Short summary
GREAT v1.0: Global Real-time Early Assessment of Tsunamis
Usama Kadri, Ali Abdolali, and Maxim Filimonov
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3487–3507, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3487-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3487-2025, 2025
Short summary
Using automatic calibration to improve the physics behind complex numerical models: an example from a 3D lake model using Delft3D (v6.02.10) and DYNO-PODS (v1.0)
Marina Amadori, Abolfazl Irani Rahaghi, Damien Bouffard, and Marco Toffolon
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3473–3486, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3473-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3473-2025, 2025
Short summary
Improvements to the Met Office's global ocean–sea ice forecasting system including model and data assimilation changes
Davi Mignac, Jennifer Waters, Daniel J. Lea, Matthew J. Martin, James While, Anthony T. Weaver, Arthur Vidard, Catherine Guiavarc'h, Dave Storkey, David Ford, Edward W. Blockley, Jonathan Baker, Keith Haines, Martin R. Price, Michael J. Bell, and Richard Renshaw
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3405–3425, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3405-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3405-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Auclair, F., Bordois, L., Dossmann, Y., Duhaut, T., Paci, A., Ulses, C., and Nguyen, C.: A non-hydrostatic non-Boussinesq algorithm for free-surface ocean modelling, Ocean Model., 132, 12–29, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2018.07.011, 2018. a, b
Auclair, F., Benshila, R., Capet, X., Debreu, L., Dumas, F., Jullien, S., and Marchesiello, P.: Coastal and Regional Ocean COmmunity model, https://www.croco-ocean.org/, last access: 8 May 2024. a
Bachman, S. D., Fox-Kemper, B., and Pearson, B.: A Scale-Aware Subgrid Model for Quasigeostrophic Turbulence, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 122, 1529–1554, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012265, 2017. a
Beets, C. and Koren, B.: Large-eddy simulation with accurate implicit subgrid-scale diffusion, Department of Numerical Mathematics Rep., NM-R9601, pp. 24, 1996. a
Borges, R., Carmona, M., Costa, B., and Don, W. S.: An improved weighted essentially non-oscillatory scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws, J. Comput. Phys., 227, 3191–3211, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2007.11.038, 2008. a
Download
Short summary
Simulations of the oceanic turbulent boundary layer using the nonhydrostatic CROCO ROMS and NCAR-LES models are compared. CROCO and the NCAR-LES are accurate in a similar manner, but CROCO’s additional features (e.g., nesting and realism) and its compressible turbulence formulation carry additional costs.
Share