Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 17, issue 10
Articles | Volume 17, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4095-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4095-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 17, issue 10
Model evaluation paper
 | 
26 May 2024
Model evaluation paper |  | 26 May 2024

Comparison of the Coastal and Regional Ocean COmmunity model (CROCO) and NCAR-LES in non-hydrostatic simulations

Xiaoyu Fan, Baylor Fox-Kemper, Nobuhiro Suzuki, Qing Li, Patrick Marchesiello, Peter P. Sullivan, and Paul S. Hall

Viewed

Total article views: 3,161 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,313 722 126 3,161 123 168
  • HTML: 2,313
  • PDF: 722
  • XML: 126
  • Total: 3,161
  • BibTeX: 123
  • EndNote: 168
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Sep 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 Sep 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,161 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,147 with geography defined and 14 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 11 Feb 2026
Download
Short summary
Simulations of the oceanic turbulent boundary layer using the nonhydrostatic CROCO ROMS and NCAR-LES models are compared. CROCO and the NCAR-LES are accurate in a similar manner, but CROCO’s additional features (e.g., nesting and realism) and its compressible turbulence formulation carry additional costs.
Read more
Share