Articles | Volume 15, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2673-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2673-2022
Model evaluation paper
 | 
01 Apr 2022
Model evaluation paper |  | 01 Apr 2022

Simulation of organics in the atmosphere: evaluation of EMACv2.54 with the Mainz Organic Mechanism (MOM) coupled to the ORACLE (v1.0) submodel

Andrea Pozzer, Simon F. Reifenberg, Vinod Kumar, Bruno Franco, Matthias Kohl, Domenico Taraborrelli, Sergey Gromov, Sebastian Ehrhart, Patrick Jöckel, Rolf Sander, Veronica Fall, Simon Rosanka, Vlassis Karydis, Dimitris Akritidis, Tamara Emmerichs, Monica Crippa, Diego Guizzardi, Johannes W. Kaiser, Lieven Clarisse, Astrid Kiendler-Scharr, Holger Tost, and Alexandra Tsimpidi

Related authors

Interactive Simulation of Methane and Hydrogen Soil Deposition in ECHAM5/MESSy Atmospheric Chemistry Model (EMAC) v2.55 with the new Submodel BIODEP (v1.0)
Anna Martin, Klaus Klingmüller, Benedikt Steil, Sergey Gromov, Yu-Ri Lee, Dong Yeong Chang, Nic Surawski, Jos Lelieveld, Sujong Jeong, and Andrea Pozzer
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-371,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-371, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Sources and variability of surface ozone over the Tibetan Plateau revealed by in situ observations and EMAC model simulations
Yihan Zou, Jianzhong Ma, Ningwei Liu, Weili Lin, Xiaobin Xu, Yunjia Li, Siyang Cheng, Xiangdong Zheng, Andrea Pozzer, and Jos Lelieveld
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-499,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-499, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Global atmospheric hydrogen chemistry and source-sink budget equilibrium simulation with the EMAC v2.55 model
Nic Surawski, Benedikt Steil, Christoph Brühl, Sergey Gromov, Klaus Klingmüller, Anna Martin, Andrea Pozzer, and Jos Lelieveld
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 911–931, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-911-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-911-2026, 2026
Short summary
Modelling the deep convective transport of trace gases (CO, NH3 and SO2) from the planetary boundary layer to the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone
Jianzhong Ma, Bin Chen, Qianshan He, Xiaolu Yan, Gaili Wang, Siyang Cheng, Benedikt Steil, Christoph Brühl, Andrea Pozzer, and Jos Lelieveld
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5587,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5587, 2025
Short summary
Enhancement of O3–CO ratios at tropospheric subtropical latitudes: Photochemistry and stratospheric influence
Linda Ort, Andrea Pozzer, Peter Hoor, Florian Obersteiner, Andreas Zahn, Thomas B. Ryerson, Chelsea R. Thompson, Jeff Peischl, Róisín Commane, Bruce Daube, Ilann Bourgeois, Jos Lelieveld, and Horst Fischer
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 14987–15007, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-14987-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-14987-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Akagi, S. K., Yokelson, R. J., Wiedinmyer, C., Alvarado, M. J., Reid, J. S., Karl, T., Crounse, J. D., and Wennberg, P. O.: Emission factors for open and domestic biomass burning for use in atmospheric models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 4039–4072, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4039-2011, 2011. a, b
Allen, H., Crounse, J., Kim, M., Teng, A., and Wennberg, P.: ATom: L2 In Situ Data from Caltech Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometer (CIT-CIMS), ORNL DAAC [data set], https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1713, 2019. a
Ames, R. B. and Malm, W. C.: Comparison of sulfate and nitrate particle mass concentrations measured by IMPROVE and the CDN, Atmos. Environ., 35, 905–916, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00369-1, 2001. a, b
Andreae, M. O.: Emission of trace gases and aerosols from biomass burning – an updated assessment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8523–8546, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8523-2019, 2019. a, b, c
Apel, E., Asher, E., Hills, A., and Hornbrook, R.: ATom: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) from the TOGA instrument, Version 2, ORNL DAAC [data set], https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1936, 2021. a
Download
Short summary
A newly developed setup of the chemistry general circulation model EMAC (ECHAM5/MESSy for Atmospheric Chemistry) is evaluated here. A comprehensive organic degradation mechanism is used and coupled with a volatility base model. The results show that the model reproduces most of the tracers and aerosols satisfactorily but shows discrepancies for oxygenated organic gases. It is also shown that this model configuration can be used for further research in atmospheric chemistry.
Share