Articles | Volume 17, issue 14
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5573-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5573-2024
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
24 Jul 2024
Methods for assessment of models |  | 24 Jul 2024

Reduced floating-point precision in regional climate simulations: an ensemble-based statistical verification

Hugo Banderier, Christian Zeman, David Leutwyler, Stefan Rüdisühli, and Christoph Schär

Related authors

A climatological characterisation of North Atlantic winter jet streaks and their extremes
Mona Bukenberger, Lena Fasnacht, Stefan Rüdisühli, and Sebastian Schemm
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1789,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1789, 2024
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Weather and Climate Dynamics (WCD).
Short summary
Exploring a high-level programming model for the NWP domain using ECMWF microphysics schemes
Stefano Ubbiali, Christian Kühnlein, Christoph Schär, Linda Schlemmer, Thomas C. Schulthess, Michael Staneker, and Heini Wernli
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-92,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-92, 2024
Preprint under review for GMD
Short summary
Exploring hail and lightning diagnostics over the Alpine-Adriatic region in a km-scale climate model
Ruoyi Cui, Nikolina Ban, Marie-Estelle Demory, Raffael Aellig, Oliver Fuhrer, Jonas Jucker, Xavier Lapillonne, and Christoph Schär
Weather Clim. Dynam., 4, 905–926, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-905-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-905-2023, 2023
Short summary
How well does a convection-permitting regional climate model represent the reverse orographic effect of extreme hourly precipitation?
Eleonora Dallan, Francesco Marra, Giorgia Fosser, Marco Marani, Giuseppe Formetta, Christoph Schär, and Marco Borga
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1133–1149, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1133-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1133-2023, 2023
Short summary
The pseudo-global-warming (PGW) approach: methodology, software package PGW4ERA5 v1.1, validation, and sensitivity analyses
Roman Brogli, Christoph Heim, Jonas Mensch, Silje Lund Sørland, and Christoph Schär
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 907–926, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-907-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-907-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Climate and Earth system modeling
TorchClim v1.0: a deep-learning plugin for climate model physics
David Fuchs, Steven C. Sherwood, Abhnil Prasad, Kirill Trapeznikov, and Jim Gimlett
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5459–5475, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5459-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5459-2024, 2024
Short summary
Linking global terrestrial and ocean biogeochemistry with process-based, coupled freshwater algae–nutrient–solid dynamics in LM3-FANSY v1.0
Minjin Lee, Charles A. Stock, John P. Dunne, and Elena Shevliakova
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5191–5224, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5191-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5191-2024, 2024
Short summary
Validating a microphysical prognostic stratospheric aerosol implementation in E3SMv2 using observations after the Mount Pinatubo eruption
Hunter York Brown, Benjamin Wagman, Diana Bull, Kara Peterson, Benjamin Hillman, Xiaohong Liu, Ziming Ke, and Lin Lin
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5087–5121, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5087-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5087-2024, 2024
Short summary
Implementing detailed nucleation predictions in the Earth system model EC-Earth3.3.4: sulfuric acid–ammonia nucleation
Carl Svenhag, Moa K. Sporre, Tinja Olenius, Daniel Yazgi, Sara M. Blichner, Lars P. Nieradzik, and Pontus Roldin
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4923–4942, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4923-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4923-2024, 2024
Short summary
Modeling biochar effects on soil organic carbon on croplands in a microbial decomposition model (MIMICS-BC_v1.0)
Mengjie Han, Qing Zhao, Xili Wang, Ying-Ping Wang, Philippe Ciais, Haicheng Zhang, Daniel S. Goll, Lei Zhu, Zhe Zhao, Zhixuan Guo, Chen Wang, Wei Zhuang, Fengchang Wu, and Wei Li
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4871–4890, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4871-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4871-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Ackmann, J., Dueben, P. D., Palmer, T., and Smolarkiewicz, P. K.: Mixed-Precision for Linear Solvers in Global Geophysical Flows, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 14, e2022MS003148, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022MS003148, 2022. a
Banderier, H.: Spatially averaged test results comparing SP and DP COSMO simulations, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8399468, 2023a. a
Banderier, H.: hbanderier/cosmo-sp: v1.0.0-rc.1, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8398547, 2023b. a
Benjamini, Y. and Hochberg, Y.: Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing, J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B Met., 57, 289–300, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x, 1995. a
Brown, A., Milton, S., Cullen, M., Golding, B., Mitchell, J., and Shelly, A.: Unified Modeling and Prediction of Weather and Climate: A 25-Year Journey, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 93, 1865–1877, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00018.1, 2012. a
Download
Short summary
We investigate the effects of reduced-precision arithmetic in a state-of-the-art regional climate model by studying the results of 10-year-long simulations. After this time, the results of the reduced precision and the standard implementation are hardly different. This should encourage the use of reduced precision in climate models to exploit the speedup and memory savings it brings. The methodology used in this work can help researchers verify reduced-precision implementations of their model.