Articles | Volume 17, issue 14
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5573-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5573-2024
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
24 Jul 2024
Methods for assessment of models |  | 24 Jul 2024

Reduced floating-point precision in regional climate simulations: an ensemble-based statistical verification

Hugo Banderier, Christian Zeman, David Leutwyler, Stefan Rüdisühli, and Christoph Schär

Related authors

A climatological characterisation of North Atlantic winter jet streaks and their extremes
Mona Bukenberger, Lena Fasnacht, Stefan Rüdisühli, and Sebastian Schemm
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1789,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1789, 2024
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Weather and Climate Dynamics (WCD).
Short summary
Exploring a high-level programming model for the NWP domain using ECMWF microphysics schemes
Stefano Ubbiali, Christian Kühnlein, Christoph Schär, Linda Schlemmer, Thomas C. Schulthess, Michael Staneker, and Heini Wernli
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-92,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-92, 2024
Preprint under review for GMD
Short summary
Exploring hail and lightning diagnostics over the Alpine-Adriatic region in a km-scale climate model
Ruoyi Cui, Nikolina Ban, Marie-Estelle Demory, Raffael Aellig, Oliver Fuhrer, Jonas Jucker, Xavier Lapillonne, and Christoph Schär
Weather Clim. Dynam., 4, 905–926, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-905-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-905-2023, 2023
Short summary
How well does a convection-permitting regional climate model represent the reverse orographic effect of extreme hourly precipitation?
Eleonora Dallan, Francesco Marra, Giorgia Fosser, Marco Marani, Giuseppe Formetta, Christoph Schär, and Marco Borga
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1133–1149, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1133-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1133-2023, 2023
Short summary
The pseudo-global-warming (PGW) approach: methodology, software package PGW4ERA5 v1.1, validation, and sensitivity analyses
Roman Brogli, Christoph Heim, Jonas Mensch, Silje Lund Sørland, and Christoph Schär
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 907–926, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-907-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-907-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Climate and Earth system modeling
HyPhAICC v1.0: a hybrid physics–AI approach for probability fields advection shown through an application to cloud cover nowcasting
Rachid El Montassir, Olivier Pannekoucke, and Corentin Lapeyre
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6657–6681, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6657-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6657-2024, 2024
Short summary
CICERO Simple Climate Model (CICERO-SCM v1.1.1) – an improved simple climate model with a parameter calibration tool
Marit Sandstad, Borgar Aamaas, Ane Nordlie Johansen, Marianne Tronstad Lund, Glen Philip Peters, Bjørn Hallvard Samset, Benjamin Mark Sanderson, and Ragnhild Bieltvedt Skeie
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6589–6625, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6589-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6589-2024, 2024
Short summary
Development of a plant carbon–nitrogen interface coupling framework in a coupled biophysical-ecosystem–biogeochemical model (SSiB5/TRIFFID/DayCent-SOM v1.0)
Zheng Xiang, Yongkang Xue, Weidong Guo, Melannie D. Hartman, Ye Liu, and William J. Parton
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6437–6464, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6437-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6437-2024, 2024
Short summary
Dynamical Madden–Julian Oscillation forecasts using an ensemble subseasonal-to-seasonal forecast system of the IAP-CAS model
Yangke Liu, Qing Bao, Bian He, Xiaofei Wu, Jing Yang, Yimin Liu, Guoxiong Wu, Tao Zhu, Siyuan Zhou, Yao Tang, Ankang Qu, Yalan Fan, Anling Liu, Dandan Chen, Zhaoming Luo, Xing Hu, and Tongwen Wu
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6249–6275, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6249-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6249-2024, 2024
Short summary
Implementation of a brittle sea ice rheology in an Eulerian, finite-difference, C-grid modeling framework: impact on the simulated deformation of sea ice in the Arctic
Laurent Brodeau, Pierre Rampal, Einar Ólason, and Véronique Dansereau
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6051–6082, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6051-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6051-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Ackmann, J., Dueben, P. D., Palmer, T., and Smolarkiewicz, P. K.: Mixed-Precision for Linear Solvers in Global Geophysical Flows, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 14, e2022MS003148, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022MS003148, 2022. a
Banderier, H.: Spatially averaged test results comparing SP and DP COSMO simulations, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8399468, 2023a. a
Banderier, H.: hbanderier/cosmo-sp: v1.0.0-rc.1, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8398547, 2023b. a
Benjamini, Y. and Hochberg, Y.: Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing, J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B Met., 57, 289–300, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x, 1995. a
Brown, A., Milton, S., Cullen, M., Golding, B., Mitchell, J., and Shelly, A.: Unified Modeling and Prediction of Weather and Climate: A 25-Year Journey, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 93, 1865–1877, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00018.1, 2012. a
Download
Short summary
We investigate the effects of reduced-precision arithmetic in a state-of-the-art regional climate model by studying the results of 10-year-long simulations. After this time, the results of the reduced precision and the standard implementation are hardly different. This should encourage the use of reduced precision in climate models to exploit the speedup and memory savings it brings. The methodology used in this work can help researchers verify reduced-precision implementations of their model.