Articles | Volume 16, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-705-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-705-2023
Development and technical paper
 | 
30 Jan 2023
Development and technical paper |  | 30 Jan 2023

Monthly-scale extended predictions using the atmospheric model coupled with a slab ocean

Zhenming Wang, Shaoqing Zhang, Yishuai Jin, Yinglai Jia, Yangyang Yu, Yang Gao, Xiaolin Yu, Mingkui Li, Xiaopei Lin, and Lixin Wu

Related authors

Cluster-dynamics-based parameterization for sulfuric acid–dimethylamine nucleation: comparison and selection through box and three-dimensional modeling
Jiewen Shen, Bin Zhao, Shuxiao Wang, An Ning, Yuyang Li, Runlong Cai, Da Gao, Biwu Chu, Yang Gao, Manish Shrivastava, Jingkun Jiang, Xiuhui Zhang, and Hong He
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 10261–10278, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10261-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10261-2024, 2024
Short summary
Enhanced understanding of atmospheric blocking modulation on ozone dynamics within a high-resolution Earth system model
Wenbin Kou, Yang Gao, Dan Tong, Xiaojie Guo, Xiadong An, Wenyu Liu, Mengshi Cui, Xiuwen Guo, Shaoqing Zhang, Huiwang Gao, and Lixin Wu
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2500,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2500, 2024
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
IAPv4 ocean temperature and ocean heat content gridded dataset
Lijing Cheng, Yuying Pan, Zhetao Tan, Huayi Zheng, Yujing Zhu, Wangxu Wei, Juan Du, Huifeng Yuan, Guancheng Li, Hanlin Ye, Viktor Gouretski, Yuanlong Li, Kevin E. Trenberth, John Abraham, Yuchun Jin, Franco Reseghetti, Xiaopei Lin, Bin Zhang, Gengxin Chen, Michael E. Mann, and Jiang Zhu
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 3517–3546, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3517-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3517-2024, 2024
Short summary
Investigating the contribution of grown new particles to cloud condensation nuclei with largely varying preexisting particles – Part 2: Modeling chemical drivers and 3-D new particle formation occurrence
Ming Chu, Xing Wei, Shangfei Hai, Yang Gao, Huiwang Gao, Yujiao Zhu, Biwu Chu, Nan Ma, Juan Hong, Yele Sun, and Xiaohong Yao
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 6769–6786, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6769-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6769-2024, 2024
Short summary
Frequent haze events associated with transport and stagnation over the corridor between the North China Plain and Yangtze River Delta
Feifan Yan, Hang Su, Yafang Cheng, Rujin Huang, Hong Liao, Ting Yang, Yuanyuan Zhu, Shaoqing Zhang, Lifang Sheng, Wenbin Kou, Xinran Zeng, Shengnan Xiang, Xiaohong Yao, Huiwang Gao, and Yang Gao
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 2365–2376, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2365-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2365-2024, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Climate and Earth system modeling
A new lightning scheme in the Canadian Atmospheric Model (CanAM5.1): implementation, evaluation, and projections of lightning and fire in future climates
Cynthia Whaley, Montana Etten-Bohm, Courtney Schumacher, Ayodeji Akingunola, Vivek Arora, Jason Cole, Michael Lazare, David Plummer, Knut von Salzen, and Barbara Winter
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7141–7155, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7141-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7141-2024, 2024
Short summary
Methane dynamics in the Baltic Sea: investigating concentration, flux, and isotopic composition patterns using the coupled physical–biogeochemical model BALTSEM-CH4 v1.0
Erik Gustafsson, Bo G. Gustafsson, Martijn Hermans, Christoph Humborg, and Christian Stranne
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7157–7179, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7157-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7157-2024, 2024
Short summary
Split-explicit external mode solver in the finite volume sea ice–ocean model FESOM2
Tridib Banerjee, Patrick Scholz, Sergey Danilov, Knut Klingbeil, and Dmitry Sidorenko
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7051–7065, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7051-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7051-2024, 2024
Short summary
Applying double cropping and interactive irrigation in the North China Plain using WRF4.5
Yuwen Fan, Zhao Yang, Min-Hui Lo, Jina Hur, and Eun-Soon Im
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6929–6947, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6929-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6929-2024, 2024
Short summary
The sea ice component of GC5: coupling SI3 to HadGEM3 using conductive fluxes
Ed Blockley, Emma Fiedler, Jeff Ridley, Luke Roberts, Alex West, Dan Copsey, Daniel Feltham, Tim Graham, David Livings, Clement Rousset, David Schroeder, and Martin Vancoppenolle
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6799–6817, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6799-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6799-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Anthes, R. A.: Tropical Cyclones: Their Evolution, Structure, and Effects, Meteorological Monographs, edited by: Dutton, J., American Meteorological Society, Boston, United States, 184–211, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-935704-28-7, 1982. 
Benjamin, S. G. and Daniel, R. C.: Surface heat flux parameterizations and tropical Pacific Sea surface temperature simulations, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 6979–6989, https://doi.org/10.1029/93JC00323, 1993. 
Chassignet, E. P., Smith, L. T., Halliwell, G. R., and Bleck, R.: North Atlantic Simulations with the Hybrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM): Impact of the Vertical Coordinate Choice, Reference Pressure, and Thermobaricity, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 33, 2504–2526, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2003)033<2504:NASWTH>2.0.CO;2, 2003. 
Chen, F., Shapiro, G., and Thain, R.: Sensitivity of Sea Surface Temperature Simulation by an Ocean Model to the Resolution of the Meteorological Forcing, ISRN Oceanogr., 2013, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.5402/2013/215715, 2013. 
Cummings, J. A. and Smedstad, O. M.: Variational Data Assimilation for the Global Ocean, Oceanic and Hydrologic Applications, 303–343, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35088-7_13, 2013. 
Download
Short summary
To improve the numerical model predictability of monthly extended-range scales, we use the simplified slab ocean model (SOM) to restrict the complicated sea surface temperature (SST) bias from a 3-D dynamical ocean model. As for SST prediction, whether in space or time, the WRF-SOM is verified to have better performance than the WRF-ROMS, which has a significant impact on the atmosphere. For extreme weather events such as typhoons, the predictions of WRF-SOM are in good agreement with WRF-ROMS.