Articles | Volume 14, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5307-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5307-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Model evaluation paper
| 
23 Aug 2021
Model evaluation paper |
| 23 Aug 2021
| 23 Aug 2021
Modeling of land–surface interactions in the PALM model system 6.0: land surface model description, first evaluation, and sensitivity to model parameters
Katrin Frieda Gehrke
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Leibniz University Hannover, Institute of Meteorology and Climatology, Hanover, Germany
Matthias Sühring
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Leibniz University Hannover, Institute of Meteorology and Climatology, Hanover, Germany
Björn Maronga
Leibniz University Hannover, Institute of Meteorology and Climatology, Hanover, Germany
University of Bergen, Geophysical Institute, Bergen, Norway
Related authors
No articles found.
Sasu Karttunen, Matthias Sühring, Ewan O'Connor, and Leena Järvi
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 5725–5757, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-5725-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-5725-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents PALM-SLUrb, a single-layer urban canopy model for the PALM model system, designed to simulate urban–atmosphere interactions without resolving flow around individual buildings. The model is described in detail and evaluated against grid-resolved urban canopy simulations, demonstrating its ability to model urban surfaces accurately. By bridging the gap between computational efficiency and physical detail, PALM-SLUrb broadens PALM's potential for urban climate research.
Jaroslav Resler, Petra Bauerová, Michal Belda, Martin Bureš, Kryštof Eben, Vladimír Fuka, Jan Geletič, Radek Jareš, Jan Karel, Josef Keder, Pavel Krč, William Patiño, Jelena Radović, Hynek Řezníček, Matthias Sühring, Adriana Šindelářová, and Ondřej Vlček
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7513–7537, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7513-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7513-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Detailed modeling of urban air quality in stable conditions is a challenge. We show the unprecedented sensitivity of a large eddy simulation (LES) model to meteorological boundary conditions and model parameters in an urban environment under stable conditions. We demonstrate the crucial role of boundary conditions for the comparability of results with observations. The study reveals a strong sensitivity of the results to model parameters and model numerical instabilities during such conditions.
Gina C. Jozef, Robert Klingel, John J. Cassano, Björn Maronga, Gijs de Boer, Sandro Dahlke, and Christopher J. Cox
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 4983–4995, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4983-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4983-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Observations from the MOSAiC expedition relating to lower-atmospheric temperature, wind, stability, moisture, and surface radiation budget from radiosondes, a meteorological tower, radiation station, and ceilometer were compiled to create a dataset which describes the thermodynamic and kinematic state of the central Arctic lower atmosphere between October 2019 and September 2020. This paper describes the methods used to develop this lower-atmospheric properties dataset.
Sreenath Paleri, Luise Wanner, Matthias Sühring, Ankur Desai, and Matthias Mauder
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1721, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1721, 2023
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
We present a description and evaluation of numerical simulations of field experiment days during the CHEESEHEAD19 field campaign, conducted over a heterogeneous forested domain in Northern Wisconsin, USA. Diurnal simulations, informed and constrained by field measurements for two days during the summer and autumn were performed. The model could simulate near surface time series and profiles of atmospheric state variables and fluxes that matched relatively well with observations.
Mohamed H. Salim, Sebastian Schubert, Jaroslav Resler, Pavel Krč, Björn Maronga, Farah Kanani-Sühring, Matthias Sühring, and Christoph Schneider
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 145–171, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-145-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-145-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Radiative transfer processes are the main energy transport mechanism in urban areas which influence the surface energy budget and drive local convection. We show here the importance of each process to help modellers decide on how much detail they should include in their models to parameterize radiative transfer in urban areas. We showed how the flow field may change in response to these processes and the essential processes needed to assure acceptable quality of the numerical simulations.
Ian Boutle, Wayne Angevine, Jian-Wen Bao, Thierry Bergot, Ritthik Bhattacharya, Andreas Bott, Leo Ducongé, Richard Forbes, Tobias Goecke, Evelyn Grell, Adrian Hill, Adele L. Igel, Innocent Kudzotsa, Christine Lac, Bjorn Maronga, Sami Romakkaniemi, Juerg Schmidli, Johannes Schwenkel, Gert-Jan Steeneveld, and Benoît Vié
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 319–333, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-319-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-319-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Fog forecasting is one of the biggest problems for numerical weather prediction. By comparing many models used for fog forecasting with others used for fog research, we hoped to help guide forecast improvements. We show some key processes that, if improved, will help improve fog forecasting, such as how water is deposited on the ground. We also showed that research models were not themselves a suitable baseline for comparison, and we discuss what future observations are required to improve them.
Stefan Metzger, David Durden, Sreenath Paleri, Matthias Sühring, Brian J. Butterworth, Christopher Florian, Matthias Mauder, David M. Plummer, Luise Wanner, Ke Xu, and Ankur R. Desai
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6929–6954, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6929-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6929-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The key points are the following. (i) Integrative observing system design can multiply the information gain of surface–atmosphere field measurements. (ii) Catalyzing numerical simulations and first-principles machine learning open up observing system simulation experiments to novel applications. (iii) Use cases include natural climate solutions, emission inventory validation, urban air quality, and industry leak detection.
Eckhard Kadasch, Matthias Sühring, Tobias Gronemeier, and Siegfried Raasch
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5435–5465, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5435-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5435-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, we provide a technical description of a newly developed interface for coupling the PALM model system 6.0 to the weather prediction model COSMO. The interface allows users of PALM to simulate the detailed atmospheric flow for relatively small regions of tens of kilometres under specific weather conditions, for instance, periods around observation campaigns or extreme weather situations. We demonstrate the interface using a benchmark simulation.
Jaroslav Resler, Kryštof Eben, Jan Geletič, Pavel Krč, Martin Rosecký, Matthias Sühring, Michal Belda, Vladimír Fuka, Tomáš Halenka, Peter Huszár, Jan Karlický, Nina Benešová, Jana Ďoubalová, Kateřina Honzáková, Josef Keder, Šárka Nápravníková, and Ondřej Vlček
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 4797–4842, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4797-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4797-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We describe validation of the PALM model v6.0 against measurements collected during two observational campaigns in Dejvice, Prague. The study focuses on the evaluation of the newly developed or improved radiative and energy balance modules in PALM related to urban modelling. In addition to the energy-related quantities, it also evaluates air flow and air quality under street canyon conditions.
Michal Belda, Jaroslav Resler, Jan Geletič, Pavel Krč, Björn Maronga, Matthias Sühring, Mona Kurppa, Farah Kanani-Sühring, Vladimír Fuka, Kryštof Eben, Nina Benešová, and Mikko Auvinen
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 4443–4464, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4443-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4443-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The analysis summarizes how sensitive the modelling of urban environment is to changes in physical parameters describing the city (e.g. reflectivity of surfaces) and to several heat island mitigation scenarios in a city quarter in Prague, Czech Republic. We used the large-eddy simulation modelling system PALM 6.0. Surface parameters connected to radiation show the highest sensitivity in this configuration. For heat island mitigation, urban vegetation is shown to be the most effective measure.
Jens Pfafferott, Sascha Rißmann, Matthias Sühring, Farah Kanani-Sühring, and Björn Maronga
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3511–3519, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3511-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3511-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The building model is integrated via an urban surface model into the urban climate model.
There is a strong interaction between the built environment and the urban climate.
According to the building energy concept, the energy demand results in a waste heat; this is directly transferred to the urban environment.
The impact of buildings on the urban climate is defined by different physical building parameters with different technical facilities for ventilation, heating and cooling.
Tobias Gronemeier, Kerstin Surm, Frank Harms, Bernd Leitl, Björn Maronga, and Siegfried Raasch
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3317–3333, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3317-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3317-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We demonstrate the capability of the PALM model system version 6.0 to simulate urban boundary layers. The studied situation includes a real-world building setup of the HafenCity area in Hamburg, Germany. We evaluate the simulation results against wind-tunnel measurements utilizing PALM's virtual measurement module. The comparison reveals an overall high agreement between simulation results and wind-tunnel measurements including mean wind speed and direction as well as turbulence statistics.
Antti Hellsten, Klaus Ketelsen, Matthias Sühring, Mikko Auvinen, Björn Maronga, Christoph Knigge, Fotios Barmpas, Georgios Tsegas, Nicolas Moussiopoulos, and Siegfried Raasch
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3185–3214, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3185-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3185-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Large-eddy simulation (LES) of the urban atmospheric boundary layer involves a large separation of turbulent scales, leading to prohibitive computational costs. An online LES–LES nesting scheme is implemented into the PALM model system 6.0 to overcome this problem. Test results show that the accuracy within the high-resolution nest domains approach the non-nested high-resolution reference results. The nesting can reduce the CPU by time up to 80 % compared to the fine-resolution reference runs.
Pavel Krč, Jaroslav Resler, Matthias Sühring, Sebastian Schubert, Mohamed H. Salim, and Vladimír Fuka
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3095–3120, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3095-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3095-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The adverse effects of an urban environment, e.g. heat stress and air pollution, pose a risk to health and well-being. Precise modelling of the urban climate is crucial to mitigate these effects. Conventional atmospheric models are inadequate for modelling the complex structures of the urban environment; in particular, they lack a 3-D model of radiation and its interaction with surfaces and the plant canopy. The new RTM simulates these processes within the PALM-4U urban climate model.
Basit Khan, Sabine Banzhaf, Edward C. Chan, Renate Forkel, Farah Kanani-Sühring, Klaus Ketelsen, Mona Kurppa, Björn Maronga, Matthias Mauder, Siegfried Raasch, Emmanuele Russo, Martijn Schaap, and Matthias Sühring
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1171–1193, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1171-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1171-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
An atmospheric chemistry model has been implemented in the microscale PALM model system 6.0. This article provides a detailed description of the model, its structure, input requirements, various features and limitations. Several pre-compiled ready-to-use chemical mechanisms are included in the chemistry model code; however, users can also easily implement other mechanisms. A case study is presented to demonstrate the application of the new chemistry model in the urban environment.
Wieke Heldens, Cornelia Burmeister, Farah Kanani-Sühring, Björn Maronga, Dirk Pavlik, Matthias Sühring, Julian Zeidler, and Thomas Esch
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5833–5873, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5833-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5833-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
For realistic microclimate simulations in urban areas with PALM 6.0, detailed description of surface types, buildings and vegetation is required. This paper shows how such input data sets can be derived with the example of three German cities. Various data sources are used, including remote sensing, municipal data collections and open data such as OpenStreetMap. The collection and preparation of input data sets is tedious. Future research aims therefore at semi-automated tools to support users.
Cited articles
Avissar, R. and Pielke, R. A.: A parameterization of heterogeneous land surfaces for atmospheric numerical models and its impact on regional meteorology, Mon. Weather Rev., 117, 2113–2136, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117<2113:APOHLS>2.0.CO;2, 1989. a
Beljaars, A.: The parametrization of surface fluxes in large-scale models under free convection., Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 121, 255–270, 1994. a
Beljaars, A. C. M. and Bosveld, F. C.: Cabauw data for the validation of land surface parameterization schemes, J. Climate, 10, 1172–1193, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1997)010<1172:CDFTVO>2.0.CO;2, 1997. a, b
Betts, A. K., Ball, J. H., Beljaars, A. C. M., Miller, M. J., and Viterbo, P. A.: The land surface-atmosphere interaction: A review based on observational and global modeling perspectives, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 7209–7225, https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD02135, 1996. a
Bosveld, F.:
Meteo – validated surface observations of common atmospheric variables at 10 minute interval at Cabauw,
available at: https://dataplatform.knmi.nl/dataset/cesar-surface-meteo-lb1-t10-v1-0, last access: 18 August 2021a. a
Bosveld, F.:
Meteo – validated tower profiles of wind, dew point, temperature and visibility at 10 minute interval at Cabauw,
available at: https://dataplatform.knmi.nl/dataset/cesar-tower-meteo-lb1-t10-v1-2, last access: 18 August 2021b. a
Bosveld, F.:
Surface fluxes – validated fluxes of heat, humidity, radiation, momentum and CO2 at 10 minute interval at Cabauw,
available at: https://dataplatform.knmi.nl/dataset/cesar-surface-flux-lb1-t10-v1-0, last access: 18 August 2021c. a
Bosveld, F.:
Radiation – validated surface long and shortwave radiation, both in and outgoing at 10 minute interval at Cabauw,
available at: https://dataplatform.knmi.nl/dataset/cesar-surface-rad-lb1-t10-v1-0, last access: 18 August 2021d. a
Bosveld, F.:
Soil water – validated soil moisture content profiles and water level at 10 minute interval at Cabauw,
available at: https://dataplatform.knmi.nl/dataset/cesar-soil-water-lb1-t10-v1-1, last access: 18 August 2021e. a
Bosveld, F.:
Soil heat – validated soil temperature and heat flux profiles at 10 minute interval at Cabauw,
available at: https://dataplatform.knmi.nl/dataset/cesar-soil-heat-lb1-t10-v1-0, last access: 18 August 2021f. a
Brauer, C.:
Soilmoisture – daily values taken with a TDR array at midnight local time at Cabauw,
available at: https://dataplatform.knmi.nl/dataset/cesar-tdr-soilmoisture-la1-t1d-v1-0, last access: 18 August 2021. a
Briegleb, B. P.: Delta-Eddington approximation for solar radiation in the NCAR community climate model, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 7603–7612, https://doi.org/10.1029/92JD00291, 1992. a
Brunsell, N. A., Mechem, D. B., and Anderson, M. C.: Surface heterogeneity impacts on boundary layer dynamics via energy balance partitioning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3403–3416, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3403-2011, 2011. a
Chen, F. and Dudhia, J.: Coupling an advanced land surface–hydrology model with the Penn State–NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: Model implementation and sensitivity, Mon. Weather Rev., 129, 569–585, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0569:CAALSH>2.0.CO;2, 2001. a
Clapp, R. B. and Hornberger, G. M.: Empirical Equations for Some Soil Hydraulic Properties, Water Resour. Res., 14, 601–604, 1978. a
Dai, Y., Basu, S., Maronga, B., and de Roode, S. R.: Addressing the grid-size sensitivity issue in large-eddy simulations of stable boundary layers, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 178, 63–89, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-020-00558-1, 2021. a, b
De Roo, F. and Mauder, M.: The influence of idealized surface heterogeneity on virtual turbulent flux measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 5059–5074, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5059-2018, 2018. a
de Roode, S. R., Bosveld, F. C., and Kroon, P. S.: Dew formation, eddy-correlation latent heat fluxes, and the surface energy imbalance at cabauw during stable conditions, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 135, 369–383, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-010-9476-1, 2010. a
Dipankar, A., Stevens, B., Heinze, R., Moseley, C., Zängl, G., Giorgetta, M., and Brdar, S.: Large eddy simulation using the general circulation model ICON, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 7, 963–986, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015MS000431, 2015. a
Duynkerke, P. G.: Turbulence, radiation and fog in Dutch stable boundary layers, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 90, 447–477, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026441904734, 1999. a
Eder, F., De Roo, F., Rotenberg, E., Yakir, D., Schmid, H. P., and Mauder, M.: Secondary circulations at a solitary forest surrounded by semi-arid shrubland and their impact on eddy-covariance measurements, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 211–212, 115–127, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.06.001, 2015. a, b
Ek, M. B. and Holtslag, A. A. M.: Influence of soil moisture on boundary layer cloud development, J. Hydrometeorol, 5, 86–99, https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2004)005<0086:IOSMOB>2.0.CO;2, 2004. a, b
Finnigan, J., Clement, R., Malhi, Y., Leuning, R., and Cleugh, H.: A re-evaluation of long-term flux measurement techniques part I: Averaging and coordinate rotation, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 107, 1–48, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021554900225, 2003. a
Foken, T.: The energy balance closure problem: an overview, Ecol. Appl., 18, 1351–1367, https://doi.org/10.1890/06-0922.1, 2008. a
Foken, T., Aubinet, M., Finnigan, J. J., Leclerc, M. Y., Mauder, M., and Paw U, K. T.: Results of a panel discussion about the energy balance closure correction for trace gases, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 92, ES13–ES18, https://doi.org/10.1175/2011BAMS3130.1, 2011. a, b
Garratt, J. R.: Sensitivity of climate simulations to land-surface and atmospheric boundary-layer treatments – a review, J. Climate, 6, 419–448, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1993)006<0419:SOCSTL>2.0.CO;2, 1993. a
Gehrke, K. F., Sühring, M., and Maronga, B.: Dataset: Modeling of land-surface interactions in the PALM model system 6.0: Land surface model description, first evaluation, and sensitivity to model parameters, Research Data Repository of the Leibniz University Hannover, https://doi.org/10.25835/0005529, 2020. a
Heus, T., van Heerwaarden, C. C., Jonker, H. J. J., Pier Siebesma, A., Axelsen, S., van den Dries, K., Geoffroy, O., Moene, A. F., Pino, D., de Roode, S. R., and Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, J.: Formulation of the Dutch Atmospheric Large-Eddy Simulation (DALES) and overview of its applications, Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 415–444, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-415-2010, 2010. a
Horn, G. L., Ouwersloot, H. G., Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, J., and Sikma, M.: Cloud shading effects on characteristic boundary-layer length scales, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 157, 237–263, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-015-0054-4, 2015. a
Huang, H.-Y. and Margulis, S. A.: Evaluation of a fully coupled large-eddy simulation–land surface model and its diagnosis of land-atmosphere feedbacks, Water Resour. Res., 46, W06 512, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008232, 2010. a, b
Huang, J., Lee, X., and Patton, E. G.: Dissimilarity of scalar transport in the convective boundary layer in inhomogeneous landscapes, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 130, 327–345, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-009-9356-8, 2009. a
Huang, H.-Y., Margulis, S. A., Chu, C. R., and Tsai, H.-C.: Investigation of the impacts of vegetation distribution and evaporative cooling on synthetic urban daytime climate using a coupled LES–LSM model, Hydrol. Process., 25, 1574–1586, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7919, 2011. a
Jager, C., Nakken, C., and Palland, C.: Bodemkundig onderzoek van twee graslandpercelen nabij Cabauw, NV Heidemaatschappij Beheer, 1976 (in Dutch). a
Jarvis, P. G.: The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field, Philos T. Roy. Soc. Lond., 273B, 593–610, 1976. a
Kaimal, J. C., Wyngaard, J. C., Izumi, Y., and Coté, O. R.: Spectral characteristics of surface-layer turbulence, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 98, 563–589, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49709841707, 1972. a
Koninklijk Nederlands Meteorologisch Instituut:
Radiosonde WMO-Nr 06260,
available at: https://www.knmi.nl/home, last access: 18 August 2021. a
Kulmala, M., Asmi, A., Lappalainen, H. K., Carslaw, K. S., Pöschl, U., Baltensperger, U., Hov, Ø., Brenquier, J.-L., Pandis, S. N., Facchini, M. C., Hansson, H.-C., Wiedensohler, A., and O'Dowd, C. D.: Introduction: European Integrated Project on Aerosol Cloud Climate and Air Quality interactions (EUCAARI) – integrating aerosol research from nano to global scales, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2825–2841, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2825-2009, 2009. a
Lindroth, A., Mölder, M., and Lagergren, F.: Heat storage in forest biomass improves energy balance closure, Biogeosciences, 7, 301–313, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-301-2010, 2010. a
Lohou, F. and Patton, E. G.: Surface energy balance and buoyancy response to shallow cumulus shading, J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 665–682, 2014. a
Maronga, B., Gryschka, M., Heinze, R., Hoffmann, F., Kanani-Sühring, F., Keck, M., Ketelsen, K., Letzel, M. O., Sühring, M., and Raasch, S.: The Parallelized Large-Eddy Simulation Model (PALM) version 4.0 for atmospheric and oceanic flows: model formulation, recent developments, and future perspectives, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2515–2551, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2515-2015, 2015. a, b
Maronga, B., Banzhaf, S., Burmeister, C., Esch, T., Forkel, R., Fröhlich, D., Fuka, V., Gehrke, K. F., Geletič, J., Giersch, S., Gronemeier, T., Groß, G., Heldens, W., Hellsten, A., Hoffmann, F., Inagaki, A., Kadasch, E., Kanani-Sühring, F., Ketelsen, K., Khan, B. A., Knigge, C., Knoop, H., Krč, P., Kurppa, M., Maamari, H., Matzarakis, A., Mauder, M., Pallasch, M., Pavlik, D., Pfafferott, J., Resler, J., Rissmann, S., Russo, E., Salim, M., Schrempf, M., Schwenkel, J., Seckmeyer, G., Schubert, S., Sühring, M., von Tils, R., Vollmer, L., Ward, S., Witha, B., Wurps, H., Zeidler, J., and Raasch, S.: Overview of the PALM model system 6.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1335–1372, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1335-2020, 2020. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h
Masson, V.: A physically-based scheme for the urban energy budget in atmospheric models, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 94, 357–397, 2000. a
Meijer, E.: Evaluation of humidity and temperature measurements of Vaisala”s HMP243 plus PT100 with two reference psychrometers., Tech. Rep., 229, KNMI, De Bilt, the Netherlands, 2000. a
Miralles, D. G., Teuling, A. J., van Heerwaarden, C. C., and Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, J.: Mega-heatwave temperatures due to combined soil desiccation and atmospheric heat accumulation, Nat. Geosci., 7, 345–349, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2141, 2014. a
Mironov, D., Rontu, L., Kourzeneva, E., and Terzhevik, A.: Towards improved representation of lakes in numerical weather prediction and climate models: Introduction to the special issue of Boreal Environment Research, Boreal Environ. Res., 15, 97–99, 2010. a
Noilhan, J. and Mahfouf, J.-F.: The ISBA land surface parameterisation scheme, Global Planet. Change, 13, 145–159, https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8181(95)00043-7, 1996. a
Noilhan, J. and Planton, S.: A Simple Parameterization of Land Surface Processes for Meteorological Models, Mon. Weather Rev., 117, 536–549, 1989. a
Patton, E. G., Sullivan, P. P., and Moeng, C.-H.: The influence of idealized heterogeneity on wet and dry planetary boundary layers coupled to the land surface, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 2078–2097, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3465.1, 2005. a, b
Schulz, J.-P., Dümenil, L., Polcher, J., Schlosser, C. A., and Xue, Y.: Land surface energy and moisture fluxes: Comparing three models, J. Appl. Meteorol., 37, 288–307, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1998)037<0288:LSEAMF>2.0.CO;2, 1998. a, b
Schwenkel, J. and Maronga, B.: Large-eddy simulation of radiation fog with comprehensive two-moment bulk microphysics: impact of different aerosol activation and condensation parameterizations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 7165–7181, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7165-2019, 2019. a
Shaw, J. and Weller, H.: Comparison of terrain-following and cut-cell grids using a nonhydrostatic model, Mon. Weather Rev., 144, 2085–2099, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0226.1, 2016. a
Skamarock, C., Klemp, B., Dudhia, J., Gill, O., Liu, Z., Berner, J., Wang, W., Powers, G., Duda, G., Barker, D., and Huang, X.-Y.: A description of the advanced research WRF model version 4, Tech. Rep., UCAR/NCAR, https://doi.org/10.5065/1DFH-6P97, 2019. a
Sullivan, P. P., Weil, J. C., Patton, E. G., Jonker, H. J. J., and Mironov, D. V.: Turbulent Winds and Temperature Fronts in Large-Eddy Simulations of the Stable Atmospheric Boundary Layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 1815–1840, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0339.1, 2016. a
Swenson, S. C., Burns, S. P., and Lawrence, D. M.: The impact of biomass heat storage on the canopy energy balance and atmospheric stability in the community land model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 11, 83–98, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001476, 2019.
a
van Genuchten, M.: A closed form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 44, 892–898, 1980. a
van Stratum, B. J. H. and Stevens, B.: The influence of misrepresenting the nocturnal boundary layer on idealized daytime convection in large-eddy simulation, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 7, 423–436, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014MS000370, 2015. a, b, c
