Articles | Volume 14, issue 5
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 2317–2349, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2317-2021
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 2317–2349, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2317-2021

Model evaluation paper 03 May 2021

Model evaluation paper | 03 May 2021

Comparison of ocean vertical mixing schemes in the Max Planck Institute Earth System Model (MPI-ESM1.2)

Oliver Gutjahr et al.

Related authors

Impact of increased resolution on long-standing biases in HighResMIP-PRIMAVERA climate models
Eduardo Moreno-Chamarro, Louis-Philippe Caron, Saskia Loosveldt Tomas, Oliver Gutjahr, Marie-Pierre Moine, Dian Putrasahan, Christopher D. Roberts, Malcolm J. Roberts, Retish Senan, Laurent Terray, Etienne Tourigny, and Pier Luigi Vidale
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2021-209,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2021-209, 2021
Preprint under review for GMD
Short summary
Deep water formation in the North Atlantic Ocean in high resolution global coupled climate models
Torben Koenigk, Ramon Fuentes-Franco, Virna Meccia, Oliver Gutjahr, Laura C. Jackson, Adrian L. New, Pablo Ortega, Christopher Roberts, Malcolm Roberts, Thomas Arsouze, Doroteaciro Iovino, Marie-Pierre Moine, and Dmitry V. Sein
Ocean Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/os-2020-41,https://doi.org/10.5194/os-2020-41, 2020
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Max Planck Institute Earth System Model (MPI-ESM1.2) for the High-Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP)
Oliver Gutjahr, Dian Putrasahan, Katja Lohmann, Johann H. Jungclaus, Jin-Song von Storch, Nils Brüggemann, Helmuth Haak, and Achim Stössel
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3241–3281, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3241-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3241-2019, 2019
Short summary
Quantification of ice production in Laptev Sea polynyas and its sensitivity to thin-ice parameterizations in a regional climate model
Oliver Gutjahr, Günther Heinemann, Andreas Preußer, Sascha Willmes, and Clemens Drüe
The Cryosphere, 10, 2999–3019, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-2999-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-2999-2016, 2016
Short summary

Related subject area

Oceanography
S2P3-R v2.0: computationally efficient modelling of shelf seas on regional to global scales
Paul R. Halloran, Jennifer K. McWhorter, Beatriz Arellano Nava, Robert Marsh, and William Skirving
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6177–6195, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6177-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6177-2021, 2021
Short summary
The Lagrangian-based Floating Macroalgal Growth and Drift Model (FMGDM v1.0): application to the Yellow Sea green tide
Fucang Zhou, Jianzhong Ge, Dongyan Liu, Pingxing Ding, Changsheng Chen, and Xiaodao Wei
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6049–6070, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6049-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6049-2021, 2021
Short summary
Nemo-Nordic 2.0: operational marine forecast model for the Baltic Sea
Tuomas Kärnä, Patrik Ljungemyr, Saeed Falahat, Ida Ringgaard, Lars Axell, Vasily Korabel, Jens Murawski, Ilja Maljutenko, Anja Lindenthal, Simon Jandt-Scheelke, Svetlana Verjovkina, Ina Lorkowski, Priidik Lagemaa, Jun She, Laura Tuomi, Adam Nord, and Vibeke Huess
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5731–5749, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5731-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5731-2021, 2021
Short summary
Australian tidal currents – assessment of a barotropic model (COMPAS v1.3.0 rev6631) with an unstructured grid
David A. Griffin, Mike Herzfeld, Mark Hemer, and Darren Engwirda
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5561–5582, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5561-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5561-2021, 2021
Short summary
Sedapp v2021: a nonlinear diffusion-based forward stratigraphic model for shallow marine environments
Jingzhe Li, Piyang Liu, Shuyu Sun, Zhifeng Sun, Yongzhang Zhou, Liang Gong, Jinliang Zhang, and Dongxing Du
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 4925–4937, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4925-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4925-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Adcroft, A. J., Hill, C., and Marshall, J.: Representation of Topography by Shaved Cells in a Height Coordinate Ocean Model, Mon. Weather Rev., 125, 2293–2315, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1997)125<2293:ROTBSC>2.0.CO;2, 1997. a
Aldama-Campino, A. and Döös, K.: Mediterranean overflow water in the North Atlantic and its multidecadal variability, Tellus A, 72, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1080/16000870.2018.1565027, 2020. a
Axell, L. B.: Wind-driven internal waves and Langmuir circulations in a numerical ocean moel of the southern Baltic Sea, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 3204, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JC000922, 2002. a
Benjamini, Y. and Hochberg, Y.: Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing, J. Roy. Stat. Soc., 57, 289–300, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x, 1995. a, b
Berx, B., Hansen, B., Østerhus, S., Larsen, K. M., Sherwin, T., and Jochumsen, K.: Combining in situ measurements and altimetry to estimate volume, heat and salt transport variability through the Faroe–Shetland Channel, Ocean Sci., 9, 639–654, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-639-2013, 2013. a, b
Download
Short summary
We compare four ocean vertical mixing schemes in 100-year coupled simulations with the Max Planck Institute Earth System Model (MPI-ESM1.2) and analyse their model biases. Overall, the mixing schemes modify biases in the ocean interior that vary with region and variable but produce a similar global bias pattern. We therefore cannot classify any scheme as superior but conclude that the chosen mixing scheme may be important for regional biases.