Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 14, issue 5
Articles | Volume 14, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2317-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2317-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 14, issue 5
Model evaluation paper
 | 
03 May 2021
Model evaluation paper |  | 03 May 2021

Comparison of ocean vertical mixing schemes in the Max Planck Institute Earth System Model (MPI-ESM1.2)

Oliver Gutjahr, Nils Brüggemann, Helmuth Haak, Johann H. Jungclaus, Dian A. Putrasahan, Katja Lohmann, and Jin-Song von Storch

Viewed

Total article views: 4,755 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
3,271 1,404 80 4,755 111 154
  • HTML: 3,271
  • PDF: 1,404
  • XML: 80
  • Total: 4,755
  • BibTeX: 111
  • EndNote: 154
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Aug 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 25 Aug 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,755 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,499 with geography defined and 256 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 09 Feb 2026
Download
Short summary
We compare four ocean vertical mixing schemes in 100-year coupled simulations with the Max Planck Institute Earth System Model (MPI-ESM1.2) and analyse their model biases. Overall, the mixing schemes modify biases in the ocean interior that vary with region and variable but produce a similar global bias pattern. We therefore cannot classify any scheme as superior but conclude that the chosen mixing scheme may be important for regional biases.
Read more
Share