Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 14, issue 5
Articles | Volume 14, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2317-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2317-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 14, issue 5
Model evaluation paper
 | 
03 May 2021
Model evaluation paper |  | 03 May 2021

Comparison of ocean vertical mixing schemes in the Max Planck Institute Earth System Model (MPI-ESM1.2)

Oliver Gutjahr, Nils Brüggemann, Helmuth Haak, Johann H. Jungclaus, Dian A. Putrasahan, Katja Lohmann, and Jin-Song von Storch

Viewed

Total article views: 2,943 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,964 925 54 2,943 67 51
  • HTML: 1,964
  • PDF: 925
  • XML: 54
  • Total: 2,943
  • BibTeX: 67
  • EndNote: 51
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Aug 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 25 Aug 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,943 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,704 with geography defined and 239 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 17 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
We compare four ocean vertical mixing schemes in 100-year coupled simulations with the Max Planck Institute Earth System Model (MPI-ESM1.2) and analyse their model biases. Overall, the mixing schemes modify biases in the ocean interior that vary with region and variable but produce a similar global bias pattern. We therefore cannot classify any scheme as superior but conclude that the chosen mixing scheme may be important for regional biases.
Read more