Articles | Volume 13, issue 11
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5311–5343, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5311-2020
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5311–5343, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5311-2020

Model evaluation paper 05 Nov 2020

Model evaluation paper | 05 Nov 2020

Description and evaluation of the process-based forest model 4C v2.2 at four European forest sites

Petra Lasch-Born et al.

Related authors

The PROFOUND Database for evaluating vegetation models and simulating climate impacts on European forests
Christopher P. O. Reyer, Ramiro Silveyra Gonzalez, Klara Dolos, Florian Hartig, Ylva Hauf, Matthias Noack, Petra Lasch-Born, Thomas Rötzer, Hans Pretzsch, Henning Meesenburg, Stefan Fleck, Markus Wagner, Andreas Bolte, Tanja G. M. Sanders, Pasi Kolari, Annikki Mäkelä, Timo Vesala, Ivan Mammarella, Jukka Pumpanen, Alessio Collalti, Carlo Trotta, Giorgio Matteucci, Ettore D'Andrea, Lenka Foltýnová, Jan Krejza, Andreas Ibrom, Kim Pilegaard, Denis Loustau, Jean-Marc Bonnefond, Paul Berbigier, Delphine Picart, Sébastien Lafont, Michael Dietze, David Cameron, Massimo Vieno, Hanqin Tian, Alicia Palacios-Orueta, Victor Cicuendez, Laura Recuero, Klaus Wiese, Matthias Büchner, Stefan Lange, Jan Volkholz, Hyungjun Kim, Joanna A. Horemans, Friedrich Bohn, Jörg Steinkamp, Alexander Chikalanov, Graham P. Weedon, Justin Sheffield, Flurin Babst, Iliusi Vega del Valle, Felicitas Suckow, Simon Martel, Mats Mahnken, Martin Gutsch, and Katja Frieler
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 1295–1320, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1295-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1295-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Biogeosciences
Testing stomatal models at the stand level in deciduous angiosperm and evergreen gymnosperm forests using CliMA Land (v0.1)
Yujie Wang, Philipp Köhler, Liyin He, Russell Doughty, Renato K. Braghiere, Jeffrey D. Wood, and Christian Frankenberg
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6741–6763, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6741-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6741-2021, 2021
Short summary
Comparing an exponential respiration model to alternative models for soil respiration components in a Canadian wildfire chronosequence (FireResp v1.0)
John Zobitz, Heidi Aaltonen, Xuan Zhou, Frank Berninger, Jukka Pumpanen, and Kajar Köster
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6605–6622, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6605-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6605-2021, 2021
Short summary
Accounting for forest management in the estimation of forest carbon balance using the dynamic vegetation model LPJ-GUESS (v4.0, r9710): implementation and evaluation of simulations for Europe
Mats Lindeskog, Benjamin Smith, Fredrik Lagergren, Ekaterina Sycheva, Andrej Ficko, Hans Pretzsch, and Anja Rammig
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6071–6112, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6071-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6071-2021, 2021
Short summary
FABM-NflexPD 1.0: assessing an instantaneous acclimation approach for modeling phytoplankton growth
Onur Kerimoglu, Prima Anugerahanti, and Sherwood Lan Smith
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6025–6047, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6025-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6025-2021, 2021
Short summary
A model for marine sedimentary carbonate diagenesis and paleoclimate proxy signal tracking: IMP v1.0
Yoshiki Kanzaki, Dominik Hülse, Sandra Kirtland Turner, and Andy Ridgwell
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5999–6023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5999-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5999-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Badeck, F. W., Beese, F., Berthold, D., Einert, P., Jochheim, H., Kallweit, R., Konopatzky, A., Lasch, P., Meesenburg, H., Meiwes, K.-J., Puhlmann, M., Raspe, S., Schulte-Bisping, H., Schulz, C., and Suckow, F.: Parametrisierung, Kalibrierung und Validierung von Modellen des Kohlenstoffumsatzes in Waldökosystemen und deren Böden, Bayerische Landesanstalt für Wald und Forstwirtschaft (LWF), Institut für Bodenkunde und Waldernährung der Universität Göttingen (IBW), Landesforstanstalt Eberswalde (LFE), Leibniz-Zentrum für Agrarlandschaftsforschung (ZALF), Nordwestdeutsche Forstliche Versuchsanstalt (NW-FVA), Potsdam-Institut für Klimafolgenforschung (PIK), 110, 2007. 
Baldocchi, D., Chu, H., and Reichstein, M.: Inter-annual variability of net and gross ecosystem carbon fluxes: A review, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 249, 520–533, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.05.015, 2018. 
Berninger, F., Coll, L., Vanninen, P., Mäkelä, A., Palmroth, S., and Nikinmaa, E.: Effects of tree size and position on pipe model ratios in Scots pine, Can. J. Forest Res., 35, 1294–1304, https://doi.org/10.1139/X05-055, 2005. 
Borys, A., Lasch, P., Suckow, F., and Reyer, C.: Kohlenstoffspeicherung in Buchenbeständen in Abhängigkeit von Waldpflege und Klimawandel, Allg. Forst Jagdztg., 184, 26–35, 2013. 
Download
Short summary
The process-based model 4C has been developed to study climate impacts on forests and is now freely available as an open-source tool. This paper provides a comprehensive description of the 4C version (v2.2) for scientific users of the model and presents an evaluation of 4C. The evaluation focused on forest growth, carbon water, and heat fluxes. We conclude that 4C is widely applicable, reliable, and ready to be released to the scientific community to use and further develop the model.