Articles | Volume 13, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5311-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5311-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Model evaluation paper
| 
05 Nov 2020
Model evaluation paper |
| 05 Nov 2020
| 05 Nov 2020
Description and evaluation of the process-based forest model 4C v2.2 at four European forest sites
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Member of the Leibniz Association, P.O. Box 60 12 03, 14412 Potsdam, Germany
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Member of the Leibniz Association, P.O. Box 60 12 03, 14412 Potsdam, Germany
Christopher P. O. Reyer
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Member of the Leibniz Association, P.O. Box 60 12 03, 14412 Potsdam, Germany
Martin Gutsch
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Member of the Leibniz Association, P.O. Box 60 12 03, 14412 Potsdam, Germany
Chris Kollas
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Member of the Leibniz Association, P.O. Box 60 12 03, 14412 Potsdam, Germany
DB Services GmbH, Elisabeth-Schwarzhaupt-Platz 1, 10115 Berlin, Germany
Franz-Werner Badeck
Research Centre for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, via S. Protaso, 302, 29017 Fiorenzuola d'Arda PC, Italy
Harald K. M. Bugmann
Forest Ecology, Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zürich, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland
Rüdiger Grote
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research (IMK-IFU), Kreuzeckbahnstr. 19, 82467 Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany
Cornelia Fürstenau
Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Institut für Informatik, Heinz Nixdorf Chair for Distributed Information Systems, Ernst-Abbe-Platz 1–4, 07743 Jena, Germany
Marcus Lindner
European Forest Institute, Resilience Programme, Platz der Vereinten Nationen 7, 53113 Bonn, Germany
Jörg Schaber
EXCO GmbH, Adam-Opel-Str. 9–11, 67227 Frankenthal, Germany
Related authors
Christopher P. O. Reyer, Ramiro Silveyra Gonzalez, Klara Dolos, Florian Hartig, Ylva Hauf, Matthias Noack, Petra Lasch-Born, Thomas Rötzer, Hans Pretzsch, Henning Meesenburg, Stefan Fleck, Markus Wagner, Andreas Bolte, Tanja G. M. Sanders, Pasi Kolari, Annikki Mäkelä, Timo Vesala, Ivan Mammarella, Jukka Pumpanen, Alessio Collalti, Carlo Trotta, Giorgio Matteucci, Ettore D'Andrea, Lenka Foltýnová, Jan Krejza, Andreas Ibrom, Kim Pilegaard, Denis Loustau, Jean-Marc Bonnefond, Paul Berbigier, Delphine Picart, Sébastien Lafont, Michael Dietze, David Cameron, Massimo Vieno, Hanqin Tian, Alicia Palacios-Orueta, Victor Cicuendez, Laura Recuero, Klaus Wiese, Matthias Büchner, Stefan Lange, Jan Volkholz, Hyungjun Kim, Joanna A. Horemans, Friedrich Bohn, Jörg Steinkamp, Alexander Chikalanov, Graham P. Weedon, Justin Sheffield, Flurin Babst, Iliusi Vega del Valle, Felicitas Suckow, Simon Martel, Mats Mahnken, Martin Gutsch, and Katja Frieler
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 1295–1320, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1295-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1295-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Process-based vegetation models are widely used to predict local and global ecosystem dynamics and climate change impacts. Due to their complexity, they require careful parameterization and evaluation to ensure that projections are accurate and reliable. The PROFOUND Database provides a wide range of empirical data to calibrate and evaluate vegetation models that simulate climate impacts at the forest stand scale to support systematic model intercomparisons and model development in Europe.
Gina Marano, Ulrike Hiltner, Nikolai Knapp, and Harald Bugmann
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1534, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1534, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
Drought is reshaping Europe’s forests. Using an uncalibrated process-based model across hundreds of German sites, we identified key drivers of tree mortality in European beech and Norway spruce forests. Our model captured both the timing and extent of mortality. A new bark beetle module improved predictions for spruce. High soil water capacity and heterogeneous soils reduced drought impacts. These findings offer new insights to anticipate forest responses in a warming, drying climate.
Chun Chung Yeung, Harald Bugmann, Frank Hagedorn, Margaux Moreno Duborgel, and Olalla Díaz-Yáñez
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1022, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1022, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).
Short summary
Short summary
To address the uncertain interactions between soil nitrogen (N) and carbon (C), we set up a model “experiment” in silico to test several hypothesized responses of decomposers to N. We found that decomposers were stimulated by N when decomposing high C:N detritus, but inhibited when decomposing low C:N, processed organic C. The consequence is that under exogenous N addition (e.g., contemporary N deposition), forests may accumulate light fraction C predominantly, at the expense of coarse detritus.
Edna Johanna Molina Bacca, Miodrag Stevanović, Benjamin Leon Bodirsky, Jonathan C. Doelman, Louise Parsons Chini, Jan Volkholz, Katja Frieler, Christopher Reyer, George Hurtt, Florian Humpenöder, Kristine Karstens, Jens Heinke, Christoph Müller, Jan Philipp Dietrich, Hermann Lotze-Campen, Elke Stehfest, and Alexander Popp
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2441, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2441, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Land-use change projections are vital for impact studies. This study compares updated land-use model projections, including CO2 fertilization among other upgrades, from the MAgPIE and IMAGE models under three scenarios, highlighting differences, uncertainty hotspots, and harmonization effects. Key findings include reduced bioenergy crop demand projections and differences in grassland area allocation and sizes, with socioeconomic-climate scenarios' largest effect on variance starting in 2030.
Daniel Nadal-Sala, Rüdiger Grote, David Kraus, Uri Hochberg, Tamir Klein, Yael Wagner, Fedor Tatarinov, Dan Yakir, and Nadine K. Ruehr
Biogeosciences, 21, 2973–2994, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2973-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2973-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A hydraulic model approach is presented that can be added to any physiologically based ecosystem model. Simulated plant water potential triggers stomatal closure, photosynthesis decline, root–soil resistance increases, and sapwood and foliage senescence. The model has been evaluated at an extremely dry site stocked with Aleppo pine and was able to represent gas exchange, soil water content, and plant water potential. The model also responded realistically regarding leaf senescence.
Yannek Käber, Florian Hartig, and Harald Bugmann
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2727–2753, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2727-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2727-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Many forest models include detailed mechanisms of forest growth and mortality, but regeneration is often simplified. Testing and improving forest regeneration models is challenging. We address this issue by exploring how forest inventories from unmanaged European forests can be used to improve such models. We find that competition for light among trees is captured by the model, unknown model components can be informed by forest inventory data, and climatic effects are challenging to capture.
Katja Frieler, Jan Volkholz, Stefan Lange, Jacob Schewe, Matthias Mengel, María del Rocío Rivas López, Christian Otto, Christopher P. O. Reyer, Dirk Nikolaus Karger, Johanna T. Malle, Simon Treu, Christoph Menz, Julia L. Blanchard, Cheryl S. Harrison, Colleen M. Petrik, Tyler D. Eddy, Kelly Ortega-Cisneros, Camilla Novaglio, Yannick Rousseau, Reg A. Watson, Charles Stock, Xiao Liu, Ryan Heneghan, Derek Tittensor, Olivier Maury, Matthias Büchner, Thomas Vogt, Tingting Wang, Fubao Sun, Inga J. Sauer, Johannes Koch, Inne Vanderkelen, Jonas Jägermeyr, Christoph Müller, Sam Rabin, Jochen Klar, Iliusi D. Vega del Valle, Gitta Lasslop, Sarah Chadburn, Eleanor Burke, Angela Gallego-Sala, Noah Smith, Jinfeng Chang, Stijn Hantson, Chantelle Burton, Anne Gädeke, Fang Li, Simon N. Gosling, Hannes Müller Schmied, Fred Hattermann, Jida Wang, Fangfang Yao, Thomas Hickler, Rafael Marcé, Don Pierson, Wim Thiery, Daniel Mercado-Bettín, Robert Ladwig, Ana Isabel Ayala-Zamora, Matthew Forrest, and Michel Bechtold
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1–51, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Our paper provides an overview of all observational climate-related and socioeconomic forcing data used as input for the impact model evaluation and impact attribution experiments within the third round of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project. The experiments are designed to test our understanding of observed changes in natural and human systems and to quantify to what degree these changes have already been induced by climate change.
Dirk Nikolaus Karger, Stefan Lange, Chantal Hari, Christopher P. O. Reyer, Olaf Conrad, Niklaus E. Zimmermann, and Katja Frieler
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2445–2464, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2445-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2445-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We present the first 1 km, daily, global climate dataset for climate impact studies. We show that the high-resolution data have a decreased bias and higher correlation with measurements from meteorological stations than coarser data. The dataset will be of value for a wide range of climate change impact studies both at global and regional level that benefit from using a consistent global dataset.
Abhijeet Mishra, Florian Humpenöder, Jan Philipp Dietrich, Benjamin Leon Bodirsky, Brent Sohngen, Christopher P. O. Reyer, Hermann Lotze-Campen, and Alexander Popp
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6467–6494, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6467-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6467-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Timber plantations are an increasingly important source of roundwood production, next to harvest from natural forests. However, timber plantations are currently underrepresented in global land-use models. Here, we include timber production and plantations in the MAgPIE modeling framework. This allows one to capture the competition for land between agriculture and forestry. We show that increasing timber plantations in the coming decades partly compete with cropland for limited land resources.
Jaber Rahimi, Expedit Evariste Ago, Augustine Ayantunde, Sina Berger, Jan Bogaert, Klaus Butterbach-Bahl, Bernard Cappelaere, Jean-Martial Cohard, Jérôme Demarty, Abdoul Aziz Diouf, Ulrike Falk, Edwin Haas, Pierre Hiernaux, David Kraus, Olivier Roupsard, Clemens Scheer, Amit Kumar Srivastava, Torbern Tagesson, and Rüdiger Grote
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3789–3812, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3789-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3789-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
West African Sahelian and Sudanian ecosystems are important regions for global carbon exchange, and they provide valuable food and fodder resources. Therefore, we simulated net ecosystem exchange and aboveground biomass of typical ecosystems in this region with an improved process-based biogeochemical model, LandscapeDNDC. Carbon stocks and exchange rates were particularly correlated with the abundance of trees. Grass and crop yields increased under humid climatic conditions.
Christopher P. O. Reyer, Ramiro Silveyra Gonzalez, Klara Dolos, Florian Hartig, Ylva Hauf, Matthias Noack, Petra Lasch-Born, Thomas Rötzer, Hans Pretzsch, Henning Meesenburg, Stefan Fleck, Markus Wagner, Andreas Bolte, Tanja G. M. Sanders, Pasi Kolari, Annikki Mäkelä, Timo Vesala, Ivan Mammarella, Jukka Pumpanen, Alessio Collalti, Carlo Trotta, Giorgio Matteucci, Ettore D'Andrea, Lenka Foltýnová, Jan Krejza, Andreas Ibrom, Kim Pilegaard, Denis Loustau, Jean-Marc Bonnefond, Paul Berbigier, Delphine Picart, Sébastien Lafont, Michael Dietze, David Cameron, Massimo Vieno, Hanqin Tian, Alicia Palacios-Orueta, Victor Cicuendez, Laura Recuero, Klaus Wiese, Matthias Büchner, Stefan Lange, Jan Volkholz, Hyungjun Kim, Joanna A. Horemans, Friedrich Bohn, Jörg Steinkamp, Alexander Chikalanov, Graham P. Weedon, Justin Sheffield, Flurin Babst, Iliusi Vega del Valle, Felicitas Suckow, Simon Martel, Mats Mahnken, Martin Gutsch, and Katja Frieler
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 1295–1320, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1295-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1295-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Process-based vegetation models are widely used to predict local and global ecosystem dynamics and climate change impacts. Due to their complexity, they require careful parameterization and evaluation to ensure that projections are accurate and reliable. The PROFOUND Database provides a wide range of empirical data to calibrate and evaluate vegetation models that simulate climate impacts at the forest stand scale to support systematic model intercomparisons and model development in Europe.
Genki Katata, Rüdiger Grote, Matthias Mauder, Matthias J. Zeeman, and Masakazu Ota
Biogeosciences, 17, 1071–1085, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-1071-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-1071-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, we demonstrate that high physiological activity levels during the extremely warm winter are allocated into the below-ground biomass and only to a minor extent used for additional plant growth during early spring. This process is so far largely unaccounted for in scenario analysis using global terrestrial biosphere models, and it may lead to carbon accumulation in the soil and/or carbon loss from the soil as a response to global warming.
Katja Frieler, Stefan Lange, Franziska Piontek, Christopher P. O. Reyer, Jacob Schewe, Lila Warszawski, Fang Zhao, Louise Chini, Sebastien Denvil, Kerry Emanuel, Tobias Geiger, Kate Halladay, George Hurtt, Matthias Mengel, Daisuke Murakami, Sebastian Ostberg, Alexander Popp, Riccardo Riva, Miodrag Stevanovic, Tatsuo Suzuki, Jan Volkholz, Eleanor Burke, Philippe Ciais, Kristie Ebi, Tyler D. Eddy, Joshua Elliott, Eric Galbraith, Simon N. Gosling, Fred Hattermann, Thomas Hickler, Jochen Hinkel, Christian Hof, Veronika Huber, Jonas Jägermeyr, Valentina Krysanova, Rafael Marcé, Hannes Müller Schmied, Ioanna Mouratiadou, Don Pierson, Derek P. Tittensor, Robert Vautard, Michelle van Vliet, Matthias F. Biber, Richard A. Betts, Benjamin Leon Bodirsky, Delphine Deryng, Steve Frolking, Chris D. Jones, Heike K. Lotze, Hermann Lotze-Campen, Ritvik Sahajpal, Kirsten Thonicke, Hanqin Tian, and Yoshiki Yamagata
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4321–4345, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4321-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4321-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes the simulation scenario design for the next phase of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP), which is designed to facilitate a contribution to the scientific basis for the IPCC Special Report on the impacts of 1.5 °C global warming. ISIMIP brings together over 80 climate-impact models, covering impacts on hydrology, biomes, forests, heat-related mortality, permafrost, tropical cyclones, fisheries, agiculture, energy, and coastal infrastructure.
Boris Bonn, Erika von Schneidemesser, Dorota Andrich, Jörn Quedenau, Holger Gerwig, Anja Lüdecke, Jürgen Kura, Axel Pietsch, Christian Ehlers, Dieter Klemp, Claudia Kofahl, Rainer Nothard, Andreas Kerschbaumer, Wolfgang Junkermann, Rüdiger Grote, Tobias Pohl, Konradin Weber, Birgit Lode, Philipp Schönberger, Galina Churkina, Tim M. Butler, and Mark G. Lawrence
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7785–7811, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7785-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7785-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The distribution of air pollutants (gases and particles) have been investigated in different environments in Potsdam, Germany. Remarkable variations of the pollutants have been observed for distances of tens of meters by bicycles, vans and aircraft. Vegetated areas caused reductions depending on the pollutants, the vegetation type and dimensions. Our measurements show the pollutants to be of predominantly local origin, resulting in a huge challenge for common models to resolve.
Andrea Ghirardo, Junfei Xie, Xunhua Zheng, Yuesi Wang, Rüdiger Grote, Katja Block, Jürgen Wildt, Thomas Mentel, Astrid Kiendler-Scharr, Mattias Hallquist, Klaus Butterbach-Bahl, and Jörg-Peter Schnitzler
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2901–2920, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2901-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2901-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Trees can impact urban air quality. Large emissions of plant volatiles are emitted in Beijing as a stress response to the urban polluted environment, but their impacts on secondary particulate matter remain relatively low compared to those originated from anthropogenic activities. The present study highlights the importance of including stress-induced compounds when studying plant volatile emissions.
Paul E. Reyerson, Anne Alexandre, Araks Harutyunyan, Remi Corbineau, Hector A. Martinez De La Torre, Franz Badeck, Luigi Cattivelli, and Guaciara M. Santos
Biogeosciences, 13, 1269–1286, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-1269-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-1269-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
We characterize the origin of carbon (C) in phytoliths (biosilica of higher plants) by a multi-isotope approach. We show that phytoliths occlude soil organic C adsorbed through the roots, making them unsuitable for paleo-proxy studies, 14C dating or atmospheric CO2 sequestration. Our findings are in parallel with recent soil paradigm shifts showing that soil microbes access old C and therefore call for further investigations on the role of old C in root–plant interactions and biomineralization.
D. R. Cameron, M. Van Oijen, C. Werner, K. Butterbach-Bahl, R. Grote, E. Haas, G. B. M. Heuvelink, R. Kiese, J. Kros, M. Kuhnert, A. Leip, G. J. Reinds, H. I. Reuter, M. J. Schelhaas, W. De Vries, and J. Yeluripati
Biogeosciences, 10, 1751–1773, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-1751-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-1751-2013, 2013
Related subject area
Biogeosciences
Parameterization toolbox for a physical–biogeochemical model compatible with FABM – a case study: the coupled 1D GOTM–ECOSMO E2E for the Sylt–Rømø Bight, North Sea
H2MV (v1.0): global physically constrained deep learning water cycle model with vegetation
NN-TOC v1: global prediction of total organic carbon in marine sediments using deep neural networks
China Wildfire Emission Dataset (ChinaWED v1) for the period 2012–2022
Process-based modeling of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence with VISIT-SIF version 1.0
Including the phosphorus cycle into the LPJ-GUESS dynamic global vegetation model (v4.1, r10994) – global patterns and temporal trends of N and P primary production limitation
A comprehensive land-surface vegetation model for multi-stream data assimilation, D&B v1.0
Sources of uncertainty in the SPITFIRE global fire model: development of LPJmL-SPITFIRE1.9 and directions for future improvements
The unicellular NUM v.0.91: a trait-based plankton model evaluated in two contrasting biogeographic provinces
FESOM2.1-REcoM3-MEDUSA2: an ocean–sea ice–biogeochemistry model coupled to a sediment model
Satellite-based modeling of wetland methane emissions on a global scale (SatWetCH4 1.0)
Emulating grid-based forest carbon dynamics using machine learning: an LPJ-GUESS v4.1.1 application
Systematic underestimation of type-specific ecosystem process variability in the Community Land Model v5 over Europe
pyVPRM: A next-generation Vegetation Photosynthesis and Respiration Model for the post-MODIS era
Soil nitrous oxide emissions from global land ecosystems and their drivers within the LPJ-GUESS model (v4.1)
Lambda-PFLOTRAN 1.0: a workflow for incorporating organic matter chemistry informed by ultra high resolution mass spectrometry into biogeochemical modeling
An improved model for air–sea exchange of elemental mercury in MITgcm-ECCOv4-Hg: the role of surfactants and waves
BOATSv2: new ecological and economic features improve simulations of high seas catch and effort
A dynamical process-based model for quantifying global agricultural ammonia emissions – AMmonia–CLIMate v1.0 (AMCLIM v1.0) – Part 1: Land module for simulating emissions from synthetic fertilizer use
Simulating the drought response of European tree species with the dynamic vegetation model LPJ-GUESS (v4.1, 97c552c5)
Simulating Ips typographus L. outbreak dynamics and their influence on carbon balance estimates with ORCHIDEE r8627
Biological nitrogen fixation of natural and agricultural vegetation simulated with LPJmL 5.7.9
Learning from conceptual models – a study of the emergence of cooperation towards resource protection in a social–ecological system
Development and assessment of the physical-biogeochemical ocean regional model in the Northwest Pacific: NPRT v1.0 (ROMS v3.9–TOPAZ v2.0)
TROLL 4.0: representing water and carbon fluxes, leaf phenology and intraspecific trait variation in a mixed-species individual-based forest dynamics model – Part 1: Model description
The biogeochemical model Biome-BGCMuSo v6.2 provides plausible and accurate simulations of the carbon cycle in central European beech forests
TROLL 4.0: representing water and carbon fluxes, leaf phenology, and intraspecific trait variation in a mixed-species individual-based forest dynamics model – Part 2: Model evaluation for two Amazonian sites
Estimation of above- and below-ground ecosystem parameters for the DVM-DOS-TEM v0.7.0 model using MADS v1.7.3: a synthetic case study
DeepPhenoMem V1.0: deep learning modelling of canopy greenness dynamics accounting for multi-variate meteorological memory effects on vegetation phenology
Impacts of land-use change on biospheric carbon: an oriented benchmark using the ORCHIDEE land surface model
Implementing the iCORAL (version 1.0) coral reef CaCO3 production module in the iLOVECLIM climate model
Assimilation of carbonyl sulfide (COS) fluxes within the adjoint-based data assimilation system – Nanjing University Carbon Assimilation System (NUCAS v1.0)
ML4Fire-XGBv1.0: Improving North American wildfire prediction by integrating a machine-learning fire model in a land surface model
Alquimia v1.0: A generic interface to biogeochemical codes – A tool for interoperable development, prototyping and benchmarking for multiphysics simulators
Quantifying the role of ozone-caused damage to vegetation in the Earth system: a new parameterization scheme for photosynthetic and stomatal responses
Radiocarbon analysis reveals underestimation of soil organic carbon persistence in new-generation soil models
Exploring the potential of history matching for land surface model calibration
EAT v1.0.0: a 1D test bed for physical–biogeochemical data assimilation in natural waters
Using deep learning to integrate paleoclimate and global biogeochemistry over the Phanerozoic Eon
Modelling boreal forest's mineral soil and peat C dynamics with the Yasso07 model coupled with the Ricker moisture modifier
Dynamic ecosystem assembly and escaping the “fire trap” in the tropics: insights from FATES_15.0.0
In silico calculation of soil pH by SCEPTER v1.0
Simple process-led algorithms for simulating habitats (SPLASH v.2.0): robust calculations of water and energy fluxes
A global behavioural model of human fire use and management: WHAM! v1.0
Terrestrial Ecosystem Model in R (TEMIR) version 1.0: simulating ecophysiological responses of vegetation to atmospheric chemical and meteorological changes
biospheremetrics v1.0.2: an R package to calculate two complementary terrestrial biosphere integrity indicators – human colonization of the biosphere (BioCol) and risk of ecosystem destabilization (EcoRisk)
Modeling boreal forest soil dynamics with the microbially explicit soil model MIMICS+ (v1.0)
Optimal enzyme allocation leads to the constrained enzyme hypothesis: the Soil Enzyme Steady Allocation Model (SESAM; v3.1)
Implementing a dynamic representation of fire and harvest including subgrid-scale heterogeneity in the tile-based land surface model CLASSIC v1.45
Inferring the tree regeneration niche from inventory data using a dynamic forest model
Hoa Nguyen, Ute Daewel, Neil Banas, and Corinna Schrum
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2961–2982, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2961-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2961-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Parameterization is key in modeling to reproduce observations well but is often done manually. This study presents a particle-swarm-optimizer-based toolbox for marine ecosystem models, compatible with the Framework for Aquatic Biogeochemical Models, thus enhancing its reusability. Applied to the Sylt ecosystem, the toolbox effectively (1) identified multiple parameter sets that matched observations well, providing different insights into ecosystem dynamics, and (2) optimized model complexity.
Zavud Baghirov, Martin Jung, Markus Reichstein, Marco Körner, and Basil Kraft
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2921–2943, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2921-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2921-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We use an innovative approach to studying the Earth's water cycle by integrating advanced machine learning techniques with a traditional water cycle model. Our model is designed to learn from observational data, with a particular emphasis on understanding the influence of vegetation on water movement. By closely aligning with real-world observations, our model offers new possibilities for enhancing our understanding of the water cycle and its interactions with vegetation.
Naveenkumar Parameswaran, Everardo González, Ewa Burwicz-Galerne, Malte Braack, and Klaus Wallmann
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2521–2544, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2521-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2521-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Our research uses deep learning to predict organic carbon stocks in ocean sediments, which is crucial for understanding their role in the global carbon cycle. By analysing over 22 000 samples and various seafloor characteristics, our model gives more accurate results than traditional methods. We estimate that the top 10 cm of ocean sediments hold about 156 Pg of carbon. This work enhances carbon stock estimates and helps plan future sampling strategies to better understand oceanic carbon burial.
Zhengyang Lin, Ling Huang, Hanqin Tian, Anping Chen, and Xuhui Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2509–2520, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2509-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2509-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The China Wildfire Emission Dataset (ChinaWED v1) estimated wildfire emissions in China during 2012–2022 as 78.13 Tg CO2, 279.47 Gg CH4, and 6.26 Gg N2O annually. Agricultural fires dominated emissions, while forest and grassland emissions decreased. Seasonal peaks occurred in late spring, with hotspots in northeast, southwest, and east China. The model emphasizes the importance of using localized emission factors and high-resolution fire estimates for accurate assessments.
Tatsuya Miyauchi, Makoto Saito, Hibiki M. Noda, Akihiko Ito, Tomomichi Kato, and Tsuneo Matsunaga
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2329–2347, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2329-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2329-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) is an effective indicator for monitoring photosynthetic activity. This paper introduces VISIT-SIF, a biogeochemical model developed based on the Vegetation Integrative Simulator for Trace gases (VISIT) to represent satellite-observed SIF. Our simulations reproduced the global distribution and seasonal variations in observed SIF. VISIT-SIF helps to improve photosynthetic processes through a combination of biogeochemical modeling and observed SIF.
Mateus Dantas de Paula, Matthew Forrest, David Warlind, João Paulo Darela Filho, Katrin Fleischer, Anja Rammig, and Thomas Hickler
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2249–2274, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2249-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2249-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Our study maps global nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) availability and how they changed from 1901 to 2018. We find that tropical regions are mostly P-limited, while temperate and boreal areas face N limitations. Over time, P limitation increased, especially in the tropics, while N limitation decreased. These shifts are key to understanding global plant growth and carbon storage, highlighting the importance of including P dynamics in ecosystem models.
Wolfgang Knorr, Matthew Williams, Tea Thum, Thomas Kaminski, Michael Voßbeck, Marko Scholze, Tristan Quaife, T. Luke Smallman, Susan C. Steele-Dunne, Mariette Vreugdenhil, Tim Green, Sönke Zaehle, Mika Aurela, Alexandre Bouvet, Emanuel Bueechi, Wouter Dorigo, Tarek S. El-Madany, Mirco Migliavacca, Marika Honkanen, Yann H. Kerr, Anna Kontu, Juha Lemmetyinen, Hannakaisa Lindqvist, Arnaud Mialon, Tuuli Miinalainen, Gaétan Pique, Amanda Ojasalo, Shaun Quegan, Peter J. Rayner, Pablo Reyes-Muñoz, Nemesio Rodríguez-Fernández, Mike Schwank, Jochem Verrelst, Songyan Zhu, Dirk Schüttemeyer, and Matthias Drusch
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2137–2159, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2137-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2137-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
When it comes to climate change, the land surface is where the vast majority of impacts happen. The task of monitoring those impacts across the globe is formidable and must necessarily rely on satellites – at a significant cost: the measurements are only indirect and require comprehensive physical understanding. We have created a comprehensive modelling system that we offer to the research community to explore how satellite data can be better exploited to help us capture the changes that happen on our lands.
Luke Oberhagemann, Maik Billing, Werner von Bloh, Markus Drüke, Matthew Forrest, Simon P. K. Bowring, Jessica Hetzer, Jaime Ribalaygua Batalla, and Kirsten Thonicke
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2021–2050, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2021-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2021-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Under climate change, the conditions necessary for wildfires to form are occurring more frequently in many parts of the world. To help predict how wildfires will change in future, global fire models are being developed. We analyze and further develop one such model, SPITFIRE. Our work identifies and corrects sources of substantial bias in the model that are important to the global fire modelling field. With this analysis and these developments, we help to provide a basis for future improvements.
Trine Frisbæk Hansen, Donald Eugene Canfield, Ken Haste Andersen, and Christian Jannik Bjerrum
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1895–1916, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1895-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1895-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We describe and test the size-based Nutrient-Unicellular-Multicellular model, which defines unicellular plankton using a single set of parameters, on a eutrophic and oligotrophic ecosystem. The results demonstrate that both sites can be modeled with similar parameters and robust performance over a wide range of parameters. The study shows that the model is useful for non-experts and applicable for modeling ecosystems with limited data. It holds promise for evolutionary and deep-time climate models.
Ying Ye, Guy Munhoven, Peter Köhler, Martin Butzin, Judith Hauck, Özgür Gürses, and Christoph Völker
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 977–1000, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-977-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-977-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Many biogeochemistry models assume all material reaching the seafloor is remineralized and returned to solution, which is sufficient for studies on short-term climate change. Under long-term climate change, the carbon storage in sediments slows down carbon cycling and influences feedbacks in the atmosphere–ocean–sediment system. This paper describes the coupling of a sediment model to an ocean biogeochemistry model and presents results under the pre-industrial climate and under CO2 perturbation.
Juliette Bernard, Elodie Salmon, Marielle Saunois, Shushi Peng, Penélope Serrano-Ortiz, Antoine Berchet, Palingamoorthy Gnanamoorthy, Joachim Jansen, and Philippe Ciais
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 863–883, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-863-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-863-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Despite their importance, uncertainties remain in the evaluation of the drivers of temporal variability of methane emissions from wetlands on a global scale. Here, a simplified global model is developed, taking advantage of advances in remote-sensing data and in situ observations. The model reproduces the large spatial and temporal patterns of emissions, albeit with limitations in the tropics due to data scarcity. This model, while simple, can provide valuable insights into sensitivity analyses.
Carolina Natel, David Martin Belda, Peter Anthoni, Neele Haß, Sam Rabin, and Almut Arneth
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4064, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4064, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Complex models predict forest carbon responses to future climate change but are slow and computationally intensive, limiting large-scale analyses. We used machine learning to accelerate predictions from the LPJ-GUESS vegetation model. Our emulators, based on random forests and neural networks, achieved 97 % faster simulations. This approach enables rapid exploration of climate mitigation strategies and supports informed policy decisions.
Christian Poppe Terán, Bibi S. Naz, Harry Vereecken, Roland Baatz, Rosie A. Fisher, and Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 287–317, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-287-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-287-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Carbon and water exchanges between the atmosphere and the land surface contribute to water resource availability and climate change mitigation. Land surface models, like the Community Land Model version 5 (CLM5), simulate these. This study finds that CLM5 and other data sets underestimate the magnitudes of and variability in carbon and water exchanges for the most abundant plant functional types compared to observations. It provides essential insights for further research into these processes.
Theo Glauch, Julia Marshall, Christoph Gerbig, Santiago Botía, Michał Gałkowski, Sanam N. Vardag, and André Butz
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3692, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3692, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Vegetation Photosynthesis and Respiration Model (VPRM) estimates carbon exchange between the atmosphere and biosphere by modeling gross primary production and respiration using satellite data and weather variables. Our new version, pyVPRM, supports diverse satellite products like Sentinel-2, MODIS, VIIRS and new land cover maps, enabling high spatial and temporal resolution. This improves flux estimates, especially in complex landscapes, and ensures continuity as MODIS nears decommissioning.
Jianyong Ma, Almut Arneth, Benjamin Smith, Peter Anthoni, Xu-Ri, Peter Eliasson, David Wårlind, Martin Wittenbrink, and Stefan Olin
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-223, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-223, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a powerful greenhouse gas mainly released from natural and agricultural soils. This study examines how global soil N2O emissions have changed from 1961 to 2020 and identifies key factors driving these changes using an ecological model. The findings highlight croplands as the largest source, with factors like fertilizer use and climate change enhancing emissions. Rising CO2 levels, however, can partially mitigate N2O emissions through increased plant nitrogen uptake.
Katherine A. Muller, Peishi Jiang, Glenn Hammond, Tasneem Ahmadullah, Hyun-Seob Song, Ravi Kukkadapu, Nicholas Ward, Madison Bowe, Rosalie K. Chu, Qian Zhao, Vanessa A. Garayburu-Caruso, Alan Roebuck, and Xingyuan Chen
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8955–8968, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8955-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8955-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The new Lambda-PFLOTRAN workflow incorporates organic matter chemistry into reaction networks to simulate aerobic respiration and biogeochemistry. Lambda-PFLOTRAN is a Python-based workflow in a Jupyter notebook interface that digests raw organic matter chemistry data via Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry, develops a representative reaction network, and completes a biogeochemical simulation with the open-source, parallel-reactive-flow, and transport code PFLOTRAN.
Ling Li, Peipei Wu, Peng Zhang, Shaojian Huang, and Yanxu Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8683–8695, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8683-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8683-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we incorporate sea surfactants and wave-breaking processes into MITgcm-ECCOv4-Hg. The updated model shows increased fluxes in high-wind-speed and high-wave regions and vice versa, enhancing spatial heterogeneity. It shows that elemental mercury (Hg0) transfer velocity is more sensitive to wind speed. These findings may elucidate the discrepancies in previous estimations and offer insights into global Hg cycling.
Jerome Guiet, Daniele Bianchi, Kim J. N. Scherrer, Ryan F. Heneghan, and Eric D. Galbraith
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8421–8454, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8421-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8421-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The BiOeconomic mArine Trophic Size-spectrum (BOATSv2) model dynamically simulates global commercial fish populations and their coupling with fishing activity, as emerging from environmental and economic drivers. New features, including separate pelagic and demersal populations, iron limitation, and spatial variation of fishing costs and management, improve the accuracy of high seas fisheries. The updated model code is available to simulate both historical and future scenarios.
Jize Jiang, David S. Stevenson, and Mark A. Sutton
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8181–8222, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8181-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8181-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A special model called AMmonia–CLIMate (AMCLIM) has been developed to understand and calculate NH3 emissions from fertilizer use and also taking into account how the environment influences these NH3 emissions. It is estimated that about 17 % of applied N in fertilizers was lost due to NH3 emissions. Hot and dry conditions and regions with high-pH soils can expect higher NH3 emissions.
Benjamin Franklin Meyer, João Paulo Darela-Filho, Konstantin Gregor, Allan Buras, Qiao-Lin Gu, Andreas Krause, Daijun Liu, Phillip Papastefanou, Sijeh Asuk, Thorsten E. E. Grams, Christian S. Zang, and Anja Rammig
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3352, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3352, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Climate change has increased the likelihood of drought events across Europe, potentially threatening European forest carbon sink. Dynamic vegetation models with mechanistic plant hydraulic architecture are needed to model these developments. We evaluate the plant hydraulic architecture version of LPJ-GUESS and show it's capability at capturing species-specific evapotranspiration responses to drought and reproducing flux observations of both gross primary production and evapotranspiration.
Guillaume Marie, Jina Jeong, Hervé Jactel, Gunnar Petter, Maxime Cailleret, Matthew J. McGrath, Vladislav Bastrikov, Josefine Ghattas, Bertrand Guenet, Anne Sofie Lansø, Kim Naudts, Aude Valade, Chao Yue, and Sebastiaan Luyssaert
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8023–8047, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8023-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8023-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This research looks at how climate change influences forests, and particularly how altered wind and insect activities could make forests emit instead of absorb carbon. We have updated a land surface model called ORCHIDEE to better examine the effect of bark beetles on forest health. Our findings suggest that sudden events, such as insect outbreaks, can dramatically affect carbon storage, offering crucial insights into tackling climate change.
Stephen Björn Wirth, Johanna Braun, Jens Heinke, Sebastian Ostberg, Susanne Rolinski, Sibyll Schaphoff, Fabian Stenzel, Werner von Bloh, Friedhelm Taube, and Christoph Müller
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7889–7914, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7889-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7889-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present a new approach to modelling biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) in the Lund–Potsdam–Jena managed Land dynamic global vegetation model. While in the original approach BNF depended on actual evapotranspiration, the new approach considers soil water content and temperature, vertical root distribution, the nitrogen (N) deficit and carbon (C) costs. The new approach improved simulated BNF compared to the scientific literature and the model ability to project future C and N cycle dynamics.
Saeed Harati-Asl, Liliana Perez, and Roberto Molowny-Horas
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7423–7443, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7423-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7423-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Social–ecological systems are the subject of many sustainability problems. Because of the complexity of these systems, we must be careful when intervening in them; otherwise we may cause irreversible damage. Using computer models, we can gain insight about these complex systems without harming them. In this paper we describe how we connected an ecological model of forest insect infestation with a social model of cooperation and simulated an intervention measure to save a forest from infestation.
Daehyuk Kim, Hyun-Chae Jung, Jae-Hong Moon, and Na-Hyeon Lee
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1509, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1509, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Physical–biogeochemical ocean global models is difficult to analyze oceanic environmental systems. To accurately understand the physical–biogeochemical processes at the regional scale, physical and biogeochemical models were coupled at a high resolution. The results successfully simulated the seasonal variations of chlorophyll and nutrients, particularly in the marginal seas, which were not captured by global models. The model is an important tool for studying physical–biogeochemical processes.
Isabelle Maréchaux, Fabian Jörg Fischer, Sylvain Schmitt, and Jérôme Chave
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3104, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3104, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We describe TROLL 4.0, a simulator of forest dynamics that represents trees in a virtual space at one-meter resolution. Tree birth, growth, death and the underlying physiological processes such as carbon assimilation, water transpiration and leaf phenology depend on plant traits that are measured in the field for many individuals and species. The model is thus capable of jointly simulating forest structure, diversity and ecosystem functioning, a major challenge in modelling vegetation dynamics.
Katarína Merganičová, Ján Merganič, Laura Dobor, Roland Hollós, Zoltán Barcza, Dóra Hidy, Zuzana Sitková, Pavel Pavlenda, Hrvoje Marjanovic, Daniel Kurjak, Michal Bošel'a, Doroteja Bitunjac, Maša Zorana Ostrogović Sever, Jiří Novák, Peter Fleischer, and Tomáš Hlásny
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7317–7346, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7317-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7317-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a multi-objective calibration approach leading to robust parameter values aiming to strike a balance between their local precision and broad applicability. Using the Biome-BGCMuSo model, we tested the calibrated parameter sets for simulating European beech forest dynamics across large environmental gradients. Leveraging data from 87 plots and five European countries, the results demonstrated reasonable local accuracy and plausible large-scale productivity responses.
Sylvain Schmitt, Fabian Fischer, James Ball, Nicolas Barbier, Marion Boisseaux, Damien Bonal, Benoit Burban, Xiuzhi Chen, Géraldine Derroire, Jeremy Lichstein, Daniela Nemetschek, Natalia Restrepo-Coupe, Scott Saleska, Giacomo Sellan, Philippe Verley, Grégoire Vincent, Camille Ziegler, Jérôme Chave, and Isabelle Maréchaux
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3106, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3106, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We evaluate the capability of TROLL 4.0, a simulator of forest dynamics, to represent tropical forest structure, diversity and functioning in two Amazonian forests. Evaluation data include forest inventories, carbon and water fluxes between the forest and the atmosphere, and leaf area and canopy height from remote-sensing products. The model realistically predicts the structure and composition, and the seasonality of carbon and water fluxes at both sites.
Elchin E. Jafarov, Helene Genet, Velimir V. Vesselinov, Valeria Briones, Aiza Kabeer, Andrew L. Mullen, Benjamin Maglio, Tobey Carman, Ruth Rutter, Joy Clein, Chu-Chun Chang, Dogukan Teber, Trevor Smith, Joshua M. Rady, Christina Schädel, Jennifer D. Watts, Brendan M. Rogers, and Susan M. Natali
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-158, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-158, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
Thawing permafrost could greatly impact global climate. Our study improves modeling of carbon cycling in Arctic ecosystems. We developed an automated method to fine-tune a model that simulates carbon and nitrogen flows, using computer-generated data. Using computer-generated data, we tested our method and found it enhances accuracy and reduces the time needed for calibration. This work helps make climate predictions more reliable in sensitive permafrost regions.
Guohua Liu, Mirco Migliavacca, Christian Reimers, Basil Kraft, Markus Reichstein, Andrew D. Richardson, Lisa Wingate, Nicolas Delpierre, Hui Yang, and Alexander J. Winkler
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6683–6701, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6683-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6683-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Our study employs long short-term memory (LSTM) networks to model canopy greenness and phenology, integrating meteorological memory effects. The LSTM model outperforms traditional methods, enhancing accuracy in predicting greenness dynamics and phenological transitions across plant functional types. Highlighting the importance of multi-variate meteorological memory effects, our research pioneers unlock the secrets of vegetation phenology responses to climate change with deep learning techniques.
Thi Lan Anh Dinh, Daniel Goll, Philippe Ciais, and Ronny Lauerwald
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6725–6744, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6725-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6725-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The study assesses the performance of the dynamic global vegetation model (DGVM) ORCHIDEE in capturing the impact of land-use change on carbon stocks across Europe. Comparisons with observations reveal that the model accurately represents carbon fluxes and stocks. Despite the underestimations in certain land-use conversions, the model describes general trends in soil carbon response to land-use change, aligning with the site observations.
Nathaelle Bouttes, Lester Kwiatkowski, Manon Berger, Victor Brovkin, and Guy Munhoven
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6513–6528, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6513-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6513-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Coral reefs are crucial for biodiversity, but they also play a role in the carbon cycle on long time scales of a few thousand years. To better simulate the future and past evolution of coral reefs and their effect on the global carbon cycle, hence on atmospheric CO2 concentration, it is necessary to include coral reefs within a climate model. Here we describe the inclusion of coral reef carbonate production in a carbon–climate model and its validation in comparison to existing modern data.
Huajie Zhu, Mousong Wu, Fei Jiang, Michael Vossbeck, Thomas Kaminski, Xiuli Xing, Jun Wang, Weimin Ju, and Jing M. Chen
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6337–6363, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6337-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6337-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In this work, we developed the Nanjing University Carbon Assimilation System (NUCAS v1.0). Data assimilation experiments were conducted to demonstrate the robustness and investigate the feasibility and applicability of NUCAS. The assimilation of ecosystem carbonyl sulfide (COS) fluxes improved the model performance in gross primary productivity, evapotranspiration, and sensible heat, showing that COS provides constraints on parameters relevant to carbon-, water-, and energy-related processes.
Ye Liu, Huilin Huang, Sing-Chun Wang, Tao Zhang, Donghui Xu, and Yang Chen
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-151, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-151, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
This study integrates machine learning with a land surface model to improve wildfire predictions in North America. Traditional models struggle with accurately simulating burned areas due to simplified processes. By combining the predictive power of machine learning with a land model, our hybrid framework better captures fire dynamics. This approach enhances our understanding of wildfire behavior and aids in developing more effective climate and fire management strategies.
Sergi Molins, Benjamin Andre, Jeffrey Johnson, Glenn Hammond, Benjamin Sulman, Konstantin Lipnikov, Marcus Day, James Beisman, Daniil Svyatsky, Hang Deng, Peter Lichtner, Carl Steefel, and David Moulton
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-108, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-108, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
Developing scientific software and making sure it functions properly requires a significant effort. As we advance our understanding of natural systems, however, there is the need to develop yet more complex models and codes. In this work, we present a piece of software that facilitates this work, specifically with regard to reactive processes. Existing tried-and-true codes are made available via this new interface, freeing up resources to focus on the new aspects of the problems at hand.
Fang Li, Zhimin Zhou, Samuel Levis, Stephen Sitch, Felicity Hayes, Zhaozhong Feng, Peter B. Reich, Zhiyi Zhao, and Yanqing Zhou
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6173–6193, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6173-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6173-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A new scheme is developed to model the surface ozone damage to vegetation in regional and global process-based models. Based on 4210 data points from ozone experiments, it accurately reproduces statistically significant linear or nonlinear photosynthetic and stomatal responses to ozone in observations for all vegetation types. It also enables models to implicitly capture the variability in plant ozone tolerance and the shift among species within a vegetation type.
Alexander S. Brunmayr, Frank Hagedorn, Margaux Moreno Duborgel, Luisa I. Minich, and Heather D. Graven
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5961–5985, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5961-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5961-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A new generation of soil models promises to more accurately predict the carbon cycle in soils under climate change. However, measurements of 14C (the radioactive carbon isotope) in soils reveal that the new soil models face similar problems to the traditional models: they underestimate the residence time of carbon in soils and may therefore overestimate the net uptake of CO2 by the land ecosystem. Proposed solutions include restructuring the models and calibrating model parameters with 14C data.
Nina Raoult, Simon Beylat, James M. Salter, Frédéric Hourdin, Vladislav Bastrikov, Catherine Ottlé, and Philippe Peylin
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5779–5801, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5779-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5779-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We use computer models to predict how the land surface will respond to climate change. However, these complex models do not always simulate what we observe in real life, limiting their effectiveness. To improve their accuracy, we use sophisticated statistical and computational techniques. We test a technique called history matching against more common approaches. This method adapts well to these models, helping us better understand how they work and therefore how to make them more realistic.
Jorn Bruggeman, Karsten Bolding, Lars Nerger, Anna Teruzzi, Simone Spada, Jozef Skákala, and Stefano Ciavatta
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5619–5639, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5619-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5619-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
To understand and predict the ocean’s capacity for carbon sequestration, its ability to supply food, and its response to climate change, we need the best possible estimate of its physical and biogeochemical properties. This is obtained through data assimilation which blends numerical models and observations. We present the Ensemble and Assimilation Tool (EAT), a flexible and efficient test bed that allows any scientist to explore and further develop the state of the art in data assimilation.
Dongyu Zheng, Andrew S. Merdith, Yves Goddéris, Yannick Donnadieu, Khushboo Gurung, and Benjamin J. W. Mills
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5413–5429, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5413-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5413-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study uses a deep learning method to upscale the time resolution of paleoclimate simulations to 1 million years. This improved resolution allows a climate-biogeochemical model to more accurately predict climate shifts. The method may be critical in developing new fully continuous methods that are able to be applied over a moving continental surface in deep time with high resolution at reasonable computational expense.
Boris Ťupek, Aleksi Lehtonen, Alla Yurova, Rose Abramoff, Bertrand Guenet, Elisa Bruni, Samuli Launiainen, Mikko Peltoniemi, Shoji Hashimoto, Xianglin Tian, Juha Heikkinen, Kari Minkkinen, and Raisa Mäkipää
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5349–5367, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5349-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5349-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Updating the Yasso07 soil C model's dependency on decomposition with a hump-shaped Ricker moisture function improved modelled soil organic C (SOC) stocks in a catena of mineral and organic soils in boreal forest. The Ricker function, set to peak at a rate of 1 and calibrated against SOC and CO2 data using a Bayesian approach, showed a maximum in well-drained soils. Using SOC and CO2 data together with the moisture only from the topsoil humus was crucial for accurate model estimates.
Jacquelyn K. Shuman, Rosie A. Fisher, Charles Koven, Ryan Knox, Lara Kueppers, and Chonggang Xu
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4643–4671, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4643-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4643-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We adapt a fire behavior and effects module for use in a size-structured vegetation demographic model to test how climate, fire regime, and fire-tolerance plant traits interact to determine the distribution of tropical forests and grasslands. Our model captures the connection between fire disturbance and plant fire-tolerance strategies in determining plant distribution and provides a useful tool for understanding the vulnerability of these areas under changing conditions across the tropics.
Yoshiki Kanzaki, Isabella Chiaravalloti, Shuang Zhang, Noah J. Planavsky, and Christopher T. Reinhard
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4515–4532, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4515-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4515-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Soil pH is one of the most commonly measured agronomical and biogeochemical indices, mostly reflecting exchangeable acidity. Explicit simulation of both porewater and bulk soil pH is thus crucial to the accurate evaluation of alkalinity required to counteract soil acidification and the resulting capture of anthropogenic carbon dioxide through the enhanced weathering technique. This has been enabled by the updated reactive–transport SCEPTER code and newly developed framework to simulate soil pH.
David Sandoval, Iain Colin Prentice, and Rodolfo L. B. Nóbrega
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4229–4309, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4229-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4229-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Numerous estimates of water and energy balances depend on empirical equations requiring site-specific calibration, posing risks of "the right answers for the wrong reasons". We introduce novel first-principles formulations to calculate key quantities without requiring local calibration, matching predictions from complex land surface models.
Oliver Perkins, Matthew Kasoar, Apostolos Voulgarakis, Cathy Smith, Jay Mistry, and James D. A. Millington
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3993–4016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3993-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3993-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Wildfire is often presented in the media as a danger to human life. Yet globally, millions of people’s livelihoods depend on using fire as a tool. So, patterns of fire emerge from interactions between humans, land use, and climate. This complexity means scientists cannot yet reliably say how fire will be impacted by climate change. So, we developed a new model that represents globally how people use and manage fire. The model reveals the extent and diversity of how humans live with and use fire.
Amos P. K. Tai, David H. Y. Yung, and Timothy Lam
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3733–3764, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3733-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3733-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We have developed the Terrestrial Ecosystem Model in R (TEMIR), which simulates plant carbon and pollutant uptake and predicts their response to varying atmospheric conditions. This model is designed to couple with an atmospheric chemistry model so that questions related to plant–atmosphere interactions, such as the effects of climate change, rising CO2, and ozone pollution on forest carbon uptake, can be addressed. The model has been well validated with both ground and satellite observations.
Fabian Stenzel, Johanna Braun, Jannes Breier, Karlheinz Erb, Dieter Gerten, Jens Heinke, Sarah Matej, Sebastian Ostberg, Sibyll Schaphoff, and Wolfgang Lucht
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3235–3258, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3235-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3235-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We provide an R package to compute two biosphere integrity metrics that can be applied to simulations of vegetation growth from the dynamic global vegetation model LPJmL. The pressure metric BioCol indicates that we humans modify and extract > 20 % of the potential preindustrial natural biomass production. The ecosystems state metric EcoRisk shows a high risk of ecosystem destabilization in many regions as a result of climate change and land, water, and fertilizer use.
Elin Ristorp Aas, Heleen A. de Wit, and Terje K. Berntsen
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2929–2959, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2929-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2929-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
By including microbial processes in soil models, we learn how the soil system interacts with its environment and responds to climate change. We present a soil process model, MIMICS+, which is able to reproduce carbon stocks found in boreal forest soils better than a conventional land model. With the model we also find that when adding nitrogen, the relationship between soil microbes changes notably. Coupling the model to a vegetation model will allow for further study of these mechanisms.
Thomas Wutzler, Christian Reimers, Bernhard Ahrens, and Marion Schrumpf
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2705–2725, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2705-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2705-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Soil microbes provide a strong link for elemental fluxes in the earth system. The SESAM model applies an optimality assumption to model those linkages and their adaptation. We found that a previous heuristic description was a special case of a newly developed more rigorous description. The finding of new behaviour at low microbial biomass led us to formulate the constrained enzyme hypothesis. We now can better describe how microbially mediated linkages of elemental fluxes adapt across decades.
Salvatore R. Curasi, Joe R. Melton, Elyn R. Humphreys, Txomin Hermosilla, and Michael A. Wulder
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2683–2704, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2683-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2683-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Canadian forests are responding to fire, harvest, and climate change. Models need to quantify these processes and their carbon and energy cycling impacts. We develop a scheme that, based on satellite records, represents fire, harvest, and the sparsely vegetated areas that these processes generate. We evaluate model performance and demonstrate the impacts of disturbance on carbon and energy cycling. This work has implications for land surface modeling and assessing Canada’s terrestrial C cycle.
Yannek Käber, Florian Hartig, and Harald Bugmann
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2727–2753, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2727-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2727-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Many forest models include detailed mechanisms of forest growth and mortality, but regeneration is often simplified. Testing and improving forest regeneration models is challenging. We address this issue by exploring how forest inventories from unmanaged European forests can be used to improve such models. We find that competition for light among trees is captured by the model, unknown model components can be informed by forest inventory data, and climatic effects are challenging to capture.
Cited articles
Anderegg, W. R. L., Martinez-Vilalta, J., Cailleret, M., Camarero, J. J., Ewers, B. E., Galbraith, D., Gessler, A., Grote, R., Huang, C.-y., Levick, S. R., Powell, T. L., Rowland, L., Sánchez-Salguero, R., and Trotsiuk, V.:
When a Tree Dies in the Forest: Scaling Climate-Driven Tree Mortality to Ecosystem Water and Carbon Fluxes,
Ecosystems,
19, 1133–1147, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-016-9982-1, 2016.
Badeck, F. W., Beese, F., Berthold, D., Einert, P., Jochheim, H., Kallweit, R., Konopatzky, A., Lasch, P., Meesenburg, H., Meiwes, K.-J., Puhlmann, M., Raspe, S., Schulte-Bisping, H., Schulz, C., and Suckow, F.:
Parametrisierung, Kalibrierung und Validierung von Modellen des Kohlenstoffumsatzes in Waldökosystemen und deren Böden,
Bayerische Landesanstalt für Wald und Forstwirtschaft (LWF), Institut für Bodenkunde und Waldernährung der Universität Göttingen (IBW), Landesforstanstalt Eberswalde (LFE), Leibniz-Zentrum für Agrarlandschaftsforschung (ZALF), Nordwestdeutsche Forstliche Versuchsanstalt (NW-FVA), Potsdam-Institut für Klimafolgenforschung (PIK), 110, 2007.
Baldocchi, D., Chu, H., and Reichstein, M.:
Inter-annual variability of net and gross ecosystem carbon fluxes: A review,
Agr. Forest Meteorol.,
249, 520–533, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.05.015, 2018.
Berninger, F., Coll, L., Vanninen, P., Mäkelä, A., Palmroth, S., and Nikinmaa, E.:
Effects of tree size and position on pipe model ratios in Scots pine,
Can. J. Forest Res.,
35, 1294–1304, https://doi.org/10.1139/X05-055, 2005.
Borys, A., Lasch, P., Suckow, F., and Reyer, C.:
Kohlenstoffspeicherung in Buchenbeständen in Abhängigkeit von Waldpflege und Klimawandel,
Allg. Forst Jagdztg.,
184, 26–35, 2013.
Borys, A., Suckow, F., Reyer, C., Gutsch, M., and Lasch-Born, P.:
The impact of climate change under different thinning regimes on carbon sequestration in a German forest district,
Mitig. Adapt. Strat. Gl.,
21, 861–881, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-014-9628-6, 2016.
Botkin, D.:
Forest Dynamics: An Ecological Model,
Oxford University Press, Oxford & New York, 309 pp., 1993.
Bugmann, H., Grote, R., Lasch, P., Lindner, M., and Suckow, F.:
A new forest gap model to study the effects of environmental change on forest structure and functioning,
in: Impacts of Global Change of Tree Physiology and Forest Ecosystem,
Proceedings of the International Conference on Impacts of Global Change on Tree Physiology and Forest Ecosystems, held 26–29 November 1996, Wageningen,
edited by: Mohren, G. M. J., Kramer, K., and Sabate, S.,
Forestry Science, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, 255–261, 1997.
Bugmann, H. K. M.:
A Simplified Forest Model to Study Species Composition Along Climate Gradients,
Ecology,
77, 2055–2074, https://doi.org/10.2307/2265700, 1996.
Bugmann, H., Seidl, R., Hartig, F., Bohn, F., Brůna, J., Cailleret, M., François, L., Heinke, J., Henrot, A.-J., Hickler, T., Hülsmann, L., Huth, A., Jacquemin, I., Kollas, C., Lasch-Born, P., Lexer, M. J., Merganič, J., Merganičová, K., Mette, T., Miranda, B. R., Nadal-Sala, D., Rammer, W., Rammig, A., Reineking, B., Roedig, E., Sabaté, S., Steinkamp, J., Suckow, F., Vacchiano, G., Wild, J., Xu, C., and Reyer, C. P. O.: Tree mortality submodels drive simulated long-term forest dynamics: assessing 15 models from the stand to global scale, Ecosphere, 10, e02616, https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2616, 2019.
Cameron, D. R., Van Oijen, M., Werner, C., Butterbach-Bahl, K., Grote, R., Haas, E., Heuvelink, G. B. M., Kiese, R., Kros, J., Kuhnert, M., Leip, A., Reinds, G. J., Reuter, H. I., Schelhaas, M. J., De Vries, W., and Yeluripati, J.: Environmental change impacts on the C- and N-cycle of European forests: a model comparison study, Biogeosciences, 10, 1751–1773, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-1751-2013, 2013.
Cannell, M. G. R. and Smith, R.:
Thermal time, chill days and prediction of budburst in Picea sitchensis,
J. Appl. Ecol.,
20, 951–963, 1983.
Coelho, M. T. P., Diniz, J. A., and Rangel, T. F.:
A parsimonious view of the parsimony principle in ecology and evolution,
Ecography,
42, 968–976, https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.04228, 2019.
Collalti, A., Marconi, S., Ibrom, A., Trotta, C., Anav, A., D'Andrea, E., Matteucci, G., Montagnani, L., Gielen, B., Mammarella, I., Grünwald, T., Knohl, A., Berninger, F., Zhao, Y., Valentini, R., and Santini, M.: Validation of 3D-CMCC Forest Ecosystem Model (v.5.1) against eddy covariance data for 10 European forest sites, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 479–504, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-479-2016, 2016.
Collatz, G. J., Ball, J. T., Grivet, C., and Berry, J. A.:
Physiological and Environmental-Regulation of Stomatal Conductance, Photosynthesis and Transpiration – a Model That Includes a Laminar Boundary-Layer,
Agr. Forest Meteorol.,
54, 107–136, https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(91)90002-8, 1991.
Constable, J. V. H. and Friend, A. L.:
Suitability of process-based tree growth models for addressing tree response to climate change,
Environ. Pollut.,
110, 47–59, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(99)00289-4, 2000.
Davidson, R. L.:
Effect of root/leaf temperature differentials on root∕shoot ratios in some pasture grasses and clover,
Ann. Bot.,
33, 561–569, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a084308, 1969.
Dietze, M. C. and Matthes, J. H.:
A general ecophysiological framework for modelling the impact of pests and pathogens on forest ecosystems,
Ecol. Lett.,
17, 1418–1426, https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12345, 2014.
DVWK:
Ermittlung der Verdunstung von Land- und Wasserflächen, DVWK-Merkblätter zur Wasserwirtschaft,
edited by: Deutscher Verband für Wasserwirtschaft und Kulturbau e.V.,
Wirtschafts- und Verlagsgesellschaft Gas und Wasser mbH Bonn, Bonn, 134 pp., 1996.
Dyck, S. and Peschke, G.:
Grundlagen der Hydrologie, 3 edn.,
Verlag für Bauwesen GmbH, Berlin, 536 pp., 1995.
Eggers, T.:
The impacts of manufacturing and utilization of wood products on the European carbon budget,
European Forest Institute, Joensuu, Internal report 9, 90 pp., 2002.
Ellenberg, M., Mayer, R., and Schauermann, J. (eds.):
Ökosystemforschung, Ergebnisse des Sollingprojekts, 1966–1986,
Ulmer Eugen Verlag, 1991.
Farquhar, G. D., Caemmerer, S. V., and Berry, J. A.:
A Biochemical-Model of Photosynthetic CO2 Assimilation in Leaves of C-3 Species,
Planta,
149, 78–90, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00386231, 1980.
Fisher, R. A., Muszala, S., Verteinstein, M., Lawrence, P., Xu, C., McDowell, N. G., Knox, R. G., Koven, C., Holm, J., Rogers, B. M., Spessa, A., Lawrence, D., and Bonan, G.: Taking off the training wheels: the properties of a dynamic vegetation model without climate envelopes, CLM4.5(ED), Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 3593–3619, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3593-2015, 2015.
Fontes, L., Bontemps, J.-D., Bugmann, H., van Oijen, M., Gracia, C. A., Kramer, K., Lindner, M., Rötzer, T., and Skovsgaard, J. P.:
Models for supporting forest management in a changing environment,
For. Syst.,
19, 8–9, 2010.
Forrester, D. I.:
A stand-level light interception model for horizontally and vertically heterogeneous canopies,
Ecol. Model.,
276, 14–22, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.12.021, 2014.
Franko, U.:
C- und N-Dynamik beim Umsatz organischer Substanz im Boden,
Akademie der Landwirtschaftswissenschaften der DDR, Berlin, 1990.
Fürstenau, C., Badeck, F., Lasch, P., Lexer, M., Lindner, M., Mohr, P., and Suckow, F.:
Multiple-use forest management in consideration of climate change and the interests of stakeholder groups,
Eur. J. For. Res.,
126, 225–239, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-006-0114-x, 2007.
Gerold, D.:
Modellierung des Wachstums von Waldbeständen auf der Basis der Durchmesserstruktur,
Sektion Forstwirtsch. Tharandt, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, 174 pp., 1990.
Glugla, G.:
Berechnungsverfahren zur Ermittlung des aktuellen Wassergehaltes und Gravitationswasserabflusses im Boden,
Albrecht-Thaer-Archiv,
13, 371–376, 1969.
Granier, A., Reichstein, M., Breda, N., Janssens, I. A., Falge, E., Ciais, P., Grunwald, T., Aubinet, M., Berbigier, P., Bernhofer, C., Buchmann, N., Facini, O., Grassi, G., Heinesch, B., Ilvesniemi, H., Keronen, P., Knohl, A., Kostner, B., Lagergren, F., Lindroth, A., Longdoz, B., Loustau, D., Mateus, J., Montagnani, L., Nys, C., Moors, E., Papale, D., Peiffer, M., Pilegaard, K., Pita, G., Pumpanen, J., Rambal, S., Rebmann, C., Rodrigues, A., Seufert, G., Tenhunen, J., Vesala, T., and Wang, Q.:
Evidence for soil water control on carbon and water dynamics in European forests during the extremely dry year: 2003,
Agr. Forest Meteorol.,
143, 123–145, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.12.004, 2007.
Grote, R. and Suckow, F.:
Integrating dynamic morphological properties into forest growth modeling. I. Effects on water balance and gas exchange,
Forest. Ecol. Manag.,
112, 101–119, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00329-6, 1998.
Grote, R., Suckow, F., and Bellmann, K.:
Modelling of carbon-, nitrogen-, and water balances in pine stands under changing air pollution and deposition,
in: Changes of Atmospheric Chemistry and Effects on Forest Ecosystems. A Roof Experiment Without Roof,
edited by: Hüttl, R. F. and Bellmann, K.,
Nutrients in Ecosystems, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 251–281, 1998.
Gutsch, M., Lasch-Born, P., Lüttger, A. B., Suckow, F., Murawski, A., and Pilz, T.:
Uncertainty of biomass contributions from agriculture and forestry to renewable energy resources under climate change,
Meteorol. Z.,
24, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1127/metz/2015/0532, 2015a.
Gutsch, M., Lasch-Born, P., Suckow, F., and Reyer, C.:
Modeling of Two Different Water Uptake Approaches for Mono- and Mixed-Species Forest Stands,
Forests,
6, 2125–2147, https://doi.org/10.3390/f6062125, 2015b.
Gutsch, M., Lasch-Born, P., Suckow, F., and Reyer, C. P. O.:
Evaluating the productivity of four main tree species in Germany under climate change with static reduced models,
Ann. For. Sci.,
73, 401–410, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-015-0532-3, 2016.
Gutsch, M., Lasch-Born, P., Kollas, C., Suckow, F., and Reyer, C. O. P.:
Balancing trade-offs between ecosystem services in Germany's forests under climate change,
Environ. Res. Lett.,
13, 045012, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab4e5, 2018.
Haataja, J. and Vesala, T. (eds.):
SMEAR II. Station for measuring forest ecosystem–atmosphere relation,
University of Helsinki, Department of Forest Ecology, Helsinki, 1997.
Hauskeller-Bullerjahn, K.:
Wachstum junger Eichen unter Schirm,
Berichte des Forschungszentrums Waldökosysteme, Reihe A Bd. 147,
Forschungszentrum Waldökosysteme der Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, 1997.
Hartig, F., Dyke, J., Hickler, T., Higgins, S. I., O'Hara, R. B., Scheiter, S., and Huth, A.:
Connecting dynamic vegetation models to data – an inverse perspective,
J. Biogeogr.,
39, 2240–2252, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2012.02745.x, 2012.
Haxeltine, A. and Prentice, I. C.:
BIOME3: An equilibrium terrestrial biosphere model based on ecophysiological constraints, resource availability and competition among plant functional types,
Global Biogeochem. Cy.,
10, 693–709, https://doi.org/10.1029/96GB02344, 1996a.
Haxeltine, A. and Prentice, I. C.:
A general model for the light-use efficiency of primary production,
Funct. Ecol.,
10, 551–561, https://doi.org/10.2307/2390165, 1996b.
Heide, O. M.:
Dormancy release in beech buds (Fagus sylvatica) requires both chilling and long days,
Physiol. Plantarum,
89, 187–191, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1993.tb01804.x, 1993a.
Heide, O. M.:
Daylength and thermal time responses of budburst during dormancy release in some northern deciduous trees,
Physiol. Plantarum,
88, 531–540, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1993.tb01368.x, 1993b.
Hoch, G., Richter, A., and Körnner, C.:
Non-structural carbon compounds in temperate forest trees,
Plant Cell Environ.,
26, 1067–1081, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0016-8025.2003.01032.x, 2003.
Horemans, J., A., Henrot, A., Delire, C., Kollas, C., Lasch-Born, P., Reyer, C., Suckow, F., François, L., and Ceulemans, R.:
Combining multiple statistical methods to evaluate the performance of process-based vegetation models across three forest stands,
Central European Forestry Journal,
63, 153–172, https://doi.org/10.1515/forj-2017-0025, 2017.
Ibrom, A.:
Die biophysikalische Steuerung der Kohlenstoffbilanz in einem Fichtenbestand im Solling,
Habilitationsschrift, Berichte des Forschungszentrums Waldökosysteme der Universität Göttingen, Reihe A, 236 Seiten, 2001.
Jansson, P.-E.:
Simulation model for soil water and heat conditions. Description of the SOIL model, Report,
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Soil Sciences, Division of Agricultural Hydrotechnics, Uppsala, 1991.
Johnson, I. R. and Thornley, J. H. M.:
Temperature dependance of plant and crop processes,
Ann. Bot.-London,
55, 7–24, 1985.
Karjalainen, T., Kellomäki S., and Pussinen A.:
Role of wood-based products in absorbing atmospheric carbon,
Silva Fenn.,
28, 67–80, 1994.
Kartschall, T., Döring, P., and Suckow, F.:
Simulation of Nitrogen, Water and Temperature Dynamics in Soil,
Syst. Anal. Model. Sim.,
7, 33–40, 1990.
Keane, R. E., Morgan, P., and Running, S. W.:
FIRE-BGC – A mechanistic ecological process model for simulating fire succession on coniferous forest landscapes of the northern Rocky Mountains,
Research Paper INT-RP-484,
United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT, 1996.
Keenan, T. F., Baker, I., Barr, A., Ciais, P., Davis, K., Dietze, M., Dragoni, D., Gough, C. M., Grant, R., Hollinger, D., Hufkens, K., Poulter, B., McCaughey, H., Raczka, B., Ryu, Y., Schaefer, K., Tian, H., Verbeeck, H., Zhao, M., and Richardson, A. D.:
Terrestrial biosphere model performance for inter-annual variability of land-atmosphere CO2 exchange,
Glob. Change Biol.,
18, 1971–1987, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02678.x, 2012.
Kingston, D. G., Todd, M. C., Taylor, R. G., Thompson, J. R., and Arnell, N. W.:
Uncertainty in the estimation of potential evapotranspiration under climate change,
Geophys. Res. Lett.,
36, L20403, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL040267, 2009.
Kint, V., Lasch, P., Lindner, M., and Muys, B.:
Multipurpose conversion management of Scots pine towards mixed oak-birch stands – A long-term simulation approach,
Forest. Ecol. Manag.,
257, 199–214, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.08.031, 2009.
Koitzsch, R.:
Schätzung der Bodenfeuchte aus meteorologischen Daten, Boden- und Pflanzenparametern mit einem Mehrschichtmodell,
Z. Meteorol.,
27, 302–306, 1977.
Koitzsch, R. and Günther, R.:
Modell zur ganzjährigen Simulation der Verdunstung und der Bodenfeuchte landwirtschaftlicher Nutzflächen mit und ohne Bewuchs,
Arch. Acker Pfl. Boden.,
34, 803–810, 1990.
Kollas, C., Gutsch, M., Hommel, R., Lasch-Born, P., and Suckow, F.:
Mistletoe-induced growth reductions at the forest stand scale,
Tree Physiol.,
38, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpx150, 2018.
Kramer, K.:
Selecting a model to predict the onset of growth of Fagus sylvatica,
J. Appl. Ecol.,
31, 172–181, 1994.
Kramer, K., Leinonen, I., Bartelink, H. H., Berbigier, P., Borghetti, M., Bernhofer, C., Cienciala, E., Dolman, A. J., Froer, O., Gracia, C. A., Granier, A., Grunwald, T., Hari, P., Jans, W., Kellomaki, S., Loustau, D., Magnani, F., Markkanen, T., Matteucci, G., Mohren, G. M. J., Moors, E., Nissinen, A., Peltola, H., Sabate, S., Sanchez, A., Sontag, M., Valentini, R., and Vesala, T.:
Evaluation of six process-based forest growth models using eddy-covariance measurements of CO2 and H2O fluxes at six forest sites in Europe,
Glob. Change Biol.,
8, 213–230, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00471.x, 2002.
Lagergren, F., Lindroth, A., Dellwik, E., Ibrom, A., Lankreijer, H., Launiainen, S., MÖLder, M., Kolari, P., Pilegaard, K. I. M., and Vesala, T.:
Biophysical controls on CO2 fluxes of three Northern forests based on long-term eddy covariance data,
Tellus B,
60, 143–152, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2006.00324.x, 2008.
Landsberg, J.:
Modelling forest ecosystems: state of the art, challenges, and future directions,
Can. J. Forest Res.,
33, 385–397, 2003.
Landsberg, J. J. and Waring, R. H.:
A Generalised Model of Forest Productivity Using Simplified Concepts of Radiation-Use Efficiency, Carbon Balance and Partitioning,
Forest Ecol. Manag.,
95, 209–228, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00026-1, 1997.
Lasch, P., Badeck, F.-W., Lindner, M., and Suckow, F.:
Sensitivity of simulated forest growth to changes in climate and atmospheric CO2,
Forstwiss. Centralbl.,
121, Supplement 1, 155–171, 2002.
Lasch, P., Badeck, F. W., Suckow, F., Lindner, M., and Mohr, P.:
Model-based analysis of management alternatives at stand and regional level in Brandenburg (Germany),
Forest. Ecol. Manag.,
207, 59–74, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.034, 2005.
Lasch, P., Suckow, F., and Badeck, F.-W.:
Analyses of forest ecosystems' response to climate change at level II monitoring sites,
in: Symposium: Forests in a Changing Environment – Results of 20 years ICP Forests Monitoring Göttingen, 25.-28.10.2006,
edited by: Eichhorn, J.,
Schriften aus der Forstlichen Fakultät der Universität Göttingen und der Nordwestdeutschen Forstlichen Versuchsanstalt,
J.D. Sauerländer's Verlag Frankfurt am Main, Göttingen, 136–141, 2007.
Lasch, P., Kollas, C., Rock, J., and Suckow, F.:
Potentials and impacts of short-rotation coppice plantation with aspen in Eastern Germany under conditions of climate change,
Reg. Environ. Change,
10, 83–94, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-009-0095-7, 2010.
Lasch-Born, P., Suckow, F., Gutsch, M., Reyer, C., Hauf, Y., Murawski, A., and Pilz, T.:
Forests under climate change: potential risks and opportunities,
Meteorol. Z.,
24, 157–172, https://doi.org/10.1127/metz/2014/0526, 2015.
Lasch-Born, P., Suckow, F., Badeck, F.-W., Schaber, J., Bugmann, H., Fürstenau, C., Gutsch, M., Kollas, C., and Reyer, C. P. O.:
4C model description,
PIK, Potsdam, 133, https://doi.org/10.2312/pik.2018.006, 2018.
Lasch-Born, P., Suckow, F., Gutsch, M., Kollas, C., Badeck, F.-W., Bugmann, H., Grote, R., Fürstenau, C., Schaber, J., Lindner, M., and Reyer, C.:
FORESEE – 4C. V. 2.2. ,
GFZ Data Services, Potsdam, https://doi.org/10.5880/PIK.2019.015, 2019.
Launiainen, S.:
Canopy processes, fluxes and microclimate in a pine forest,
PhD, Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, 55 pp., 2011.
Lexer, M. J. and Hönninger, K.:
A modified 3D-patch model for spatially explicit simulation of vegetation composition in heterogeneous landscapes,
Forest. Ecol. Manag.,
144, 43–65, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00386-8, 2001.
Lindner, M.:
Developing adaptive forest management strategies to cope with climate change,
Tree Physiol.,
20, 299–307, https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/20.5-6.299, 2000.
Lindner, M., Lasch, P., Badeck, F.-W., Beguiristain, P. P., Junge, S., Kellomäki, S., Peltola, H., Gracia, C., Sabate, S., Jäger, D., Lexer, M., and Freeman, M.:
Chapter 4: SilviStrat Model Evaluation Exercises,
in: Management of European Forests under Changing Climatic Conditions,
edited by: Kellomäki, S. and Leinonen, S.,
University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forerstry, Joensuu, 117–157, 2005.
Loague, K. and Green, R. E.:
Statistical and graphical methods for evaluating solute transport models: Overview and application,
J. Contam. Hydrol.,
7, 51, https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-7722(91)90038-3, 1991.
Lüttschwager, D., Rust, S., Wulf, M., Forkert, J., and Hüttl, R. F.:
Tree canopy and herb layer transpiration in three Scots pine stands with different stand structures,
Ann. For. Sci.,
56, 265–274, 1999.
Mäkelä, A.:
Modeling structural-functional relationships in whole-tree growth: resource allocation,
in: Process modeling of forest growth responses to environmental stress,
edited by: Dixon, R. K., Meldahl, R. S., Ruark, G. A., and Warren, W. G.,
Timber Press, Portland, Oregon, 81–95, 1990.
Mäkelä, A., Landsberg, J., Ek, A. R., Burk, T. E., Ter-Mikaelian, M., Agren, G. I., Oliver, C. D., and Puttonen, P.:
Process-based models for forest ecosystem management: current state of the art and challenges for practical implementation,
Tree Physiol.,
20, 289–298, https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/20.5-6.289, 2000a.
Mäkelä, A., Sievänen, R., Lindner, M., and Lasch, P.:
Application of volume growth and survival graphs in the evaluation of four process-based forest growth models,
Tree Physiol.,
20, 347–355, https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/20.5-6.347, 2000b.
Manusch, C., Bugmann, H., Heiri, C., and Wolf, A.:
Tree mortality in dynamic vegetation models – A key feature for accurately simulating forest properties,
Ecol. Model.,
243, 101–111, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.06.008, 2012.
Marconi, S., Chiti, T., Nole, A., Valentini, R., and Collalti, A.:
The Role of Respiration in Estimation of Net Carbon Cycle: Coupling Soil Carbon Dynamics and Canopy Turnover in a Novel Version of 3D-CMCC Forest Ecosystem Model,
Forests,
8, 220, https://doi.org/10.3390/f8060220, 2017.
Mayer, D. G. and Butler, D. G.:
Statistical Validation,
Ecol. Model.,
68, 21–32, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3800(93)90105-2, 1993.
Medlyn, B. E., Berbigier, P., Clement, R., Grelle, A., Loustau, D., Linder, S., Wingate, L., Jarvis, P. G., Sigurdsson, B. D., and McMurtrie, R. E.:
Carbon balance of coniferous forests growing in contrasting climates: Model-based analysis,
Agr. Forest Meteorol.,
131, 97–124, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2005.05.004, 2005a.
Medlyn, B. E., Robinson, A. P., Clement, R., and McMurtrie, R. E.:
On the validation of models of forest CO2 exchange using eddy covariance data: some perils and pitfalls,
Tree Physiol.,
25, 839–857, https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/25.7.839, 2005b.
Medlyn, B. E., Duursma, R. A., and Zeppel, M. J. B.:
Forest productivity under climate change: a checklist for evaluating model studies,
WIREs Clim. Change,
2, 332–355, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.108, 2011.
Menzel, A.:
Phänologie von Waldbäumen unter sich ändernden Klimabedingungen – Auswertung der Beobachtungen in den Internationalen Phänologischen Gärten und Möglichkeiten der Modellierung von Phänodaten,
Forstliche Forschungsberichte, Universität München, München, 150 pp., 1997.
Minunno, F., Peltoniemi, M., Launiainen, S., Aurela, M., Lindroth, A., Lohila, A., Mammarella, I., Minkkinen, K., and Mäkelä, A.:
Calibration and validation of a semi-empirical flux ecosystem model for coniferous forests in the Boreal region,
Ecol. Model.,
341, 37–52, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.09.020, 2016.
Molina-Herrera, S., Grote, R., Santabárbara-Ruiz, I., Kraus, D., Klatt, S., Haas, E., Kiese, R., and Butterbach-Bahl, K.:
Simulation of CO2 Fluxes in European Forest Ecosystems with the Coupled Soil-Vegetation Process Model “LandscapeDNDC”,
Forests,
6, 1779–1809, https://doi.org/10.3390/f6061779, 2015.
Monsi, M. and Saeki, T.:
On the Factor Light in Plant Communities and its Importance for Matter Production,
Ann. Bot.-London,
95, 549–567, https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci052, 2005.
Monteith, J. L. and Unsworth, M. H.:
Principles of environmental physics, second edn.,
Edward Arnold, London, 1990.
Naudts, K., Ryder, J., McGrath, M. J., Otto, J., Chen, Y., Valade, A., Bellasen, V., Berhongaray, G., Bönisch, G., Campioli, M., Ghattas, J., De Groote, T., Haverd, V., Kattge, J., MacBean, N., Maignan, F., Merilä, P., Penuelas, J., Peylin, P., Pinty, B., Pretzsch, H., Schulze, E. D., Solyga, D., Vuichard, N., Yan, Y., and Luyssaert, S.: A vertically discretised canopy description for ORCHIDEE (SVN r2290) and the modifications to the energy, water and carbon fluxes, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2035–2065, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2035-2015, 2015.
Neumann, M., Mues, V., Moreno, A., Hasenauer, H., and Seidl, R.:
Climate variability drives recent tree mortality in Europe,
Glob. Change Biol.,
23, 4788–4797, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13724, 2017.
Nitsch, J. P.:
Photoperiodism in woody plants,
P. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci.,
79, 526–544, 1957.
Peltoniemi, M., Pulkkinen, M., Aurela, M., Pumpanen, J., Kolari, P., and Makela, A.:
A semi-empirical model of boreal-forest gross primary production, evapotranspiration, and soil water – calibration and sensitivity analysis,
Boreal Environ. Res.,
20, 151–171, 2015.
Perry, T. O.:
Dormancy of trees in winter,
Science,
171, 29–36, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3966.29, 1971.
Pilegaard, K., Hummelshoj, P., Jensen, N. O., and Chen, Z.:
Two years of continuous CO2 eddy-flux measurements over a Danish beech forest,
Agr. Forest Meteorol.,
107, 29–41, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-1923(00)00227-6, 2001.
Pilegaard, K., Ibrom, A., Courtney, M. S., Hummelshoj, P., and Jensen, N. O.:
Increasing net CO2 uptake by a Danish beech forest during the period from 1996 to 2009,
Agr. Forest Meteorol.,
151, 934–946, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.02.013, 2011.
Porte, A. and Bartelink, H. H.:
Modelling mixed forest growth: a review of models for forest management,
Ecol. Model.,
150, 141–188, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00476-8, 2002.
Post, J., Krysanova, V., Suckow, F., Mirschel, W., Rogasik, J., and Merbach, I.:
Integrated ecohydrological modelling of soil organic matter dynamics for the assessment of environmental change impacts in meso- to macro-scale river basins,
Ecol. Model.,
206, 93–109, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.03.028, 2007.
Pretzsch, H.:
Forest Dynamics, Growth and Yield,
Springer Berlin, Germany, 664 pp., 2010.
Pretzsch, H., Grote, R., Reineking, B., Rotzer, T., and Seifert, S.:
Models for forest ecosystem management: A European perspective,
Ann. Bot.-London,
101, 1065–1087, https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcm246, 2008.
Priestley, C. H. B. and Taylor, R. J.:
On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters,
Mon. Weather Rev.,
100, 81–92, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1972)100<0081:OTAOSH>2.3.CO;2, 1972.
Reyer, C.:
Forest Productivity Under Environmental Change – a Review of Stand-Scale Modeling Studies,
Current Forestry Reports,
1, 53–68, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-015-0009-5, 2015.
Reyer, C., Lasch, P., Mohren, G. M. J., and Sterck, F. J.:
Inter-specific competition in mixed forests of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and common beech (Fagus sylvatica) under climate change – a model-based analysis,
Ann. For. Sci.,
67, 805, https://doi.org/10.1051/forest/2010041, 2010.
Reyer, C., Lasch-Born, P., Suckow, F., Gutsch, M., Murawski, A., and Pilz, T.:
Projections of regional changes in forest net primary productivity for different tree species in Europe driven by climate change and carbon dioxide,
Ann. For. Sci.,
71, 211–225, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-013-0306-8, 2014.
Reyer, C., Silveyra Gonzalez, R., Dolos, K., Hartig, F., Hauf, Y., Noack, M., Lasch-Born, P., Rötzer, T., Pretzsch, H., Meesenburg, H., Fleck, S., Wagner, M., Bolte, A., Sanders, T., Kolari, P., Mäkelä, A., Vesala, T., Mammarella, I., Pumpanen, J., Matteucci, G., Collalti, A., D'Andrea, E., Krupkova, L., Krejza, J., Ibrom, A., Pilegaard, K., Loustau, D., Bonnefond, J.-M., Berbigier, P., Picart, D., Lafont, S., Dietze, M., Cameron, D., Vieno, M., Tian, H., Palacios, A., Cicuendez, V., Büchner, M., Lange, S., Volkholz, J., Kim, H., Horemans, J., Martel, S., Bohn, F., Steinkamp, J., Suckow, F., Weedon, G., Sheffield, J., Chikalanov, A., and Frieler, K.:
The PROFOUND database for evaluating vegetation models and simulating climate impacts on forests V. 0.1.12,
GFZ Data Services, https://doi.org/10.5880/PIK.2019.008, 2019.
Reyer, C. P. O., Flechsig, M., Lasch-Born, P., and van Oijen, M.:
Integrating parameter uncertainty of a process-based model in assessments of climate change effects on forest productivity,
Climatic Change,
137, 395–409, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1694-1, 2016.
Reyer, C. P. O., Silveyra Gonzalez, R., Dolos, K., Hartig, F., Hauf, Y., Noack, M., Lasch-Born, P., Rötzer, T., Pretzsch, H., Meesenburg, H., Fleck, S., Wagner, M., Bolte, A., Sanders, T. G. M., Kolari, P., Mäkelä, A., Vesala, T., Mammarella, I., Pumpanen, J., Collalti, A., Trotta, C., Matteucci, G., D'Andrea, E., Foltýnová, L., Krejza, J., Ibrom, A., Pilegaard, K., Loustau, D., Bonnefond, J.-M., Berbigier, P., Picart, D., Lafont, S., Dietze, M., Cameron, D., Vieno, M., Tian, H., Palacios-Orueta, A., Cicuendez, V., Recuero, L., Wiese, K., Büchner, M., Lange, S., Volkholz, J., Kim, H., Horemans, J. A., Bohn, F., Steinkamp, J., Chikalanov, A., Weedon, G. P., Sheffield, J., Babst, F., Vega del Valle, I., Suckow, F., Martel, S., Mahnken, M., Gutsch, M., and Frieler, K.: The PROFOUND Database for evaluating vegetation models and simulating climate impacts on European forests, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 1295–1320, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1295-2020, 2020.
Robinson, A. P., Duursma, R. A., and Marshall, J. D.:
A regression-based equivalence test for model validation: shifting the burden of proof,
Tree Physiol.,
25, 903–913, https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/25.7.903, 2005.
Russ, A. and Riek, W.:
Pedotransferfunktionen zur Ableitung der nutzbaren Feldkapazität – Validierung für Waldböden des nordostdeutschen Tieflands,
Waldökologie, Landschaftsforschung und Naturschutz,
5–17, 2011.
Schaber, J.:
Phenology in Germany in the 20th century: methods, analyses and models,
Math.-Nat. Fakultät, Universität Potsdam, Potsdam, 164 pp., 2002.
Schaber, J. and Badeck, F.-W.:
Physiology based phenology models for forest tree species in Germany,
Int. J. Biometeorol.,
47, 193–201, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-003-0171-5, 2003.
Schall, P.:
Ein Ansatz zur Modellierung der Naturverjüngungsprozesse im Bergmischwald der östlichen bayrischen Alpen,
Forschungszentrum Waldökosysteme, Göttingen, Reihe A Bd 155, 1998.
Seidl, R., Rammer, W., Lasch, P., Badeck, F. W., and M.J., L.:
Does conversion of even-aged, secondary coniferous forest affect carbon sequestration? A simulation study under changing environmental conditions,
Silva Fenn.,
42, 369–386, https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.243, 2008.
Seidl, R., Rammer, W., Scheller, R. M., and Spies, T. A.:
An individual-based process model to simulate landscape-scale forest ecosystem dynamics,
Ecol. Model.,
231, 87–100, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.02.015, 2012.
Shinozaki, K., Yoda, K., Hozumi, K., and Kira, T.:
A quantitative analysis of plant form – the pipe model theory. I. Basic analysis,
Jap. J. Ecology,
14, 97–105, 1964.
Smith, P., Smith, J. U., Powlson, D. S., McGill, W. B., Arah, J. R. M., Chertov, O. G., Coleman, K., Franko, U., Frolking, S., Jenkinson, D. S., Jensen, L. S., Kelly, R. H., Klein-Gunnewiek, H., Komarov, A. S., Li, C., Molina, J. A. E., Mueller, T., Parton, W. J., Thornley, J. H. M., and Whitmore, A. P.:
A comparison of the performance of nine soil organic matter models using datasets from seven long-term experiments,
Geoderma,
81, 153–225, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(97)00087-6, 1997.
Suckow, F.:
A Model Serving The Calculation Of Soil Temperatures,
Z. Meteorol.,
35, 66–70, 1985.
Suckow, F.: Ein
Modell zur Berechnung der Bodentemperatur unter Brache und unter Pflanzenbestand,
Akademie der Landwirtschaftswissenschaften der DDR, Berlin, 1986.
Suckow, F., Badeck, F.-W., Lasch, P., and Schaber, J.:
Nutzung von Level-II-Beobachtungen für Test und Anwendungen des Sukzessionsmodells FORESEE,
Beiträge für Forstwirtschaft und Landschaftsökologie,
35, 84–87, 2001.
Suckow, F., Lasch-Born, P., Gerstengarbe, F.-W., Werner, P., and Reyer, C. P. O.:
Climate change impacts on a pine stand in Central Siberia,
Reg. Environ. Change,
16, 1671–1683, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0915-x, 2016.
van't Hoff, J. H.:
Etudes de dynamique chimique,
Muller, Amsterdam, 214 pp., 1884.
Van Hees, A. F. M.:
Growth and Morphology of Pedunculate Oak (Quercus robur L.) and Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) Seedlings in Relation to Shading and Drought,
Ann. Sci. Forest.,
54, 9–18, https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:19970102, 1997.
van Oijen, M., Reyer, C., Bohn, F. J., Cameron, D. R., Deckmyn, G., Flechsig, M., Härkönen, S., Hartig, F., Huth, A., Kiviste, A., Lasch, P., Mäkelä, A., Mette, T., Minunno, F., and Rammer, W.:
Bayesian calibration, comparison and averaging of six forest models, using data from Scots pine stands across Europe,
Forest. Ecol. Manag.,
289, 255–268, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.09.043, 2013.
Vegis, A.:
Dependence of growth processes on temperature,
in: Temperature and life,
edited by: Precht, H., Christophersen, J., H.Hensel, and Larcher, W.,
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 145–169, 1973.
Vetter, M., Churkina, G., Jung, M., Reichstein, M., Zaehle, S., Bondeau, A., Chen, Y., Ciais, P., Feser, F., Freibauer, A., Geyer, R., Jones, C., Papale, D., Tenhunen, J., Tomelleri, E., Trusilova, K., Viovy, N., and Heimann, M.: Analyzing the causes and spatial pattern of the European 2003 carbon flux anomaly using seven models, Biogeosciences, 5, 561–583, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-5-561-2008, 2008.
Wang, J. Y.:
A critique of the heat unit approach to plant response studies,
Ecology,
41, 785–790, 1960.
Wareing, P. F.:
Photoperiodism in woody plants,
Annu. Rev. Plant Phys.,
7, 191–214, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.07.060156.001203, 1956.
Waring, R. H., Landsberg, J. J., and Williams, M.:
Net Primary Production of Forests – a Constant Fraction of Gross Primary Production?,
Tree Physiol.,
18, 129–134, https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/18.2.129, 1998.
Wösten, J. H. M., Pachepsky, Y. A., and Rawls, W. J.:
Pedotransfer functions: bridging the gap between available basic soil data and missing soil hydraulic characteristics,
J. Hydrol., 251, 123–150, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00464-4, 2001.
Wu, S. H., Jansson, P.-E., and Kolari, P.:
Modeling seasonal course of carbon fluxes and evapotranspiration in response to low temperature and moisture in a boreal Scots pine ecosystem,
Ecol. Model.,
222, 3103–3119, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.05.023, 2011.
Wu, S. H., Jansson, P.-E., and Kolari, P.:
The role of air and soil temperature in the seasonality of photosynthesis and transpiration in a boreal Scots pine ecosystem,
Agr. Forest Meteorol.,
156, 85–103, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.01.006, 2012.
Short summary
The process-based model 4C has been developed to study climate impacts on forests and is now freely available as an open-source tool. This paper provides a comprehensive description of the 4C version (v2.2) for scientific users of the model and presents an evaluation of 4C. The evaluation focused on forest growth, carbon water, and heat fluxes. We conclude that 4C is widely applicable, reliable, and ready to be released to the scientific community to use and further develop the model.
The process-based model 4C has been developed to study climate impacts on forests and is now...
