Articles | Volume 13, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2125-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2125-2020
Model evaluation paper
 | 
30 Apr 2020
Model evaluation paper |  | 30 Apr 2020

WRF-Chem v3.9 simulations of the East Asian dust storm in May 2017: modeling sensitivities to dust emission and dry deposition schemes

Yi Zeng, Minghuai Wang, Chun Zhao, Siyu Chen, Zhoukun Liu, Xin Huang, and Yang Gao

Related authors

Investigating the contribution of grown new particles to cloud condensation nuclei with largely varying preexisting particles – Part 2: Modeling chemical drivers and 3-D new particle formation occurrence
Ming Chu, Xing Wei, Shangfei Hai, Yang Gao, Huiwang Gao, Yujiao Zhu, Biwu Chu, Nan Ma, Juan Hong, Yele Sun, and Xiaohong Yao
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 6769–6786, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6769-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6769-2024, 2024
Short summary
Diagnosing uncertainties in global biomass burning emission inventories and their impact on modeled air pollutants
Wenxuan Hua, Sijia Lou, Xin Huang, Lian Xue, Ke Ding, Zilin Wang, and Aijun Ding
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 6787–6807, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6787-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6787-2024, 2024
Short summary
Amending the algorithm of aerosol-radiation interaction in WRF-Chem (v4.4)
Jiawang Feng, Chun Zhao, Qiuyan Du, Zining Yang, and Chen Jin
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-69,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-69, 2024
Preprint under review for GMD
Short summary
Simulations of Snow Physicochemical Properties in Northern China using WRF-Chem
Xia Wang, Tao Che, Xueyin Ruan, Shanna Yue, Jing Wang, Chun Zhao, and Lei Geng
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-37,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-37, 2024
Preprint under review for GMD
Short summary
Cluster Dynamics-based Parameterization for Sulfuric Acid-Dimethylamine Nucleation: Comparison and Selection through Box- and Three-Dimensional- Modeling
Jiewen Shen, Bin Zhao, Shuxiao Wang, An Ning, Yuyang Li, Runlong Cai, Da Gao, Biwu Chu, Yang Gao, Manish Shrivastava, Jingkun Jiang, Xiuhui Zhang, and Hong He
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-642,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-642, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
A general comprehensive evaluation method for cross-scale precipitation forecasts
Bing Zhang, Mingjian Zeng, Anning Huang, Zhengkun Qin, Couhua Liu, Wenru Shi, Xin Li, Kefeng Zhu, Chunlei Gu, and Jialing Zhou
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4579–4601, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4579-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4579-2024, 2024
Short summary
Implementation of a Simple Actuator Disk for Large-Eddy Simulation in the Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF-SADLES v1.2) for wind turbine wake simulation
Hai Bui, Mostafa Bakhoday-Paskyabi, and Mohammadreza Mohammadpour-Penchah
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4447–4465, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4447-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4447-2024, 2024
Short summary
WRF-PDAF v1.0: implementation and application of an online localized ensemble data assimilation framework
Changliang Shao and Lars Nerger
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4433–4445, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4433-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4433-2024, 2024
Short summary
Implementation and evaluation of diabatic advection in the Lagrangian transport model MPTRAC 2.6
Jan Clemens, Lars Hoffmann, Bärbel Vogel, Sabine Grießbach, and Nicole Thomas
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4467–4493, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4467-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4467-2024, 2024
Short summary
An improved and extended parameterization of the CO2 15 µm cooling in the middle and upper atmosphere (CO2_cool_fort-1.0)
Manuel López-Puertas, Federico Fabiano, Victor Fomichev, Bernd Funke, and Daniel R. Marsh
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4401–4432, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4401-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4401-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Abuduwaili, J., Liu, D., and Wu, G.: Saline dust storms and their ecological impacts in arid regions, J. Arid Land, 2, 144–150, https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1227.2010.00144, 2010. 
Bergametti, G., Marticorena, B., Rajot, J. L., Foret, G., Alfaro, S. C., and Laurent, B.: Size-Resolved Dry Deposition Velocities of Dust Particles: In Situ Measurements and Parameterizations Testing, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 11080–11099, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028964, 2018. 
Binkowski, F. S. and Shankar, U.: The Regional Particulate Matter Model: 1. Model description and preliminary results, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 26191, https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD02093, 1995. 
Chamberlain, A. C.: Transport of Lycopodium spores and other small particles to rough surfaces, P. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. A., 296, 45–70, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1967.0005, 1967. 
Chen, F. and Dudhia, J.: Coupling an Advanced Land Surface–Hydrology Model with the Penn State–NCAR MM5 Modeling System. Part I: Model Implementation and Sensitivity, Mon. Weather Rev., 129, 569–585, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0569:CAALSH>2.0.CO;2, 2001. 
Download
Short summary
Dust aerosol can impact many processes of the Earth system, but large uncertainties still remain in dust simulations. In this study, we investigated dust simulation sensitivity to two dust emission schemes and three dry deposition schemes using WRF-Chem. An optimal combination of dry deposition scheme and dust emission scheme has been identified to best simulate the dust storm in comparison with observation. Our results highlight the importance of dry deposition schemes for dust simulation.