Articles | Volume 13, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2125-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2125-2020
Model evaluation paper
 | 
30 Apr 2020
Model evaluation paper |  | 30 Apr 2020

WRF-Chem v3.9 simulations of the East Asian dust storm in May 2017: modeling sensitivities to dust emission and dry deposition schemes

Yi Zeng, Minghuai Wang, Chun Zhao, Siyu Chen, Zhoukun Liu, Xin Huang, and Yang Gao

Related authors

Investigating the contribution of grown new particles to cloud condensation nuclei with largely varying preexisting particles – Part 2: Modeling chemical drivers and 3-D new particle formation occurrence
Ming Chu, Xing Wei, Shangfei Hai, Yang Gao, Huiwang Gao, Yujiao Zhu, Biwu Chu, Nan Ma, Juan Hong, Yele Sun, and Xiaohong Yao
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 6769–6786, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6769-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6769-2024, 2024
Short summary
Diagnosing uncertainties in global biomass burning emission inventories and their impact on modeled air pollutants
Wenxuan Hua, Sijia Lou, Xin Huang, Lian Xue, Ke Ding, Zilin Wang, and Aijun Ding
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 6787–6807, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6787-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6787-2024, 2024
Short summary
Amending the algorithm of aerosol-radiation interaction in WRF-Chem (v4.4)
Jiawang Feng, Chun Zhao, Qiuyan Du, Zining Yang, and Chen Jin
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-69,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-69, 2024
Preprint under review for GMD
Short summary
Simulations of Snow Physicochemical Properties in Northern China using WRF-Chem
Xia Wang, Tao Che, Xueyin Ruan, Shanna Yue, Jing Wang, Chun Zhao, and Lei Geng
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-37,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-37, 2024
Preprint under review for GMD
Short summary
Cluster Dynamics-based Parameterization for Sulfuric Acid-Dimethylamine Nucleation: Comparison and Selection through Box- and Three-Dimensional- Modeling
Jiewen Shen, Bin Zhao, Shuxiao Wang, An Ning, Yuyang Li, Runlong Cai, Da Gao, Biwu Chu, Yang Gao, Manish Shrivastava, Jingkun Jiang, Xiuhui Zhang, and Hong He
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-642,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-642, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
New explicit formulae for the settling speed of prolate spheroids in the atmosphere: theoretical background and implementation in AerSett v2.0.2
Sylvain Mailler, Sotirios Mallios, Arineh Cholakian, Vassilis Amiridis, Laurent Menut, and Romain Pennel
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5641–5655, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5641-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5641-2024, 2024
Short summary
ZJU-AERO V0.5: an Accurate and Efficient Radar Operator designed for CMA-GFS/MESO with the capability to simulate non-spherical hydrometeors
Hejun Xie, Lei Bi, and Wei Han
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5657–5688, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5657-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5657-2024, 2024
Short summary
The Year of Polar Prediction site Model Intercomparison Project (YOPPsiteMIP) phase 1: project overview and Arctic winter forecast evaluation
Jonathan J. Day, Gunilla Svensson, Barbara Casati, Taneil Uttal, Siri-Jodha Khalsa, Eric Bazile, Elena Akish, Niramson Azouz, Lara Ferrighi, Helmut Frank, Michael Gallagher, Øystein Godøy, Leslie M. Hartten, Laura X. Huang, Jareth Holt, Massimo Di Stefano, Irene Suomi, Zen Mariani, Sara Morris, Ewan O'Connor, Roberta Pirazzini, Teresa Remes, Rostislav Fadeev, Amy Solomon, Johanna Tjernström, and Mikhail Tolstykh
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5511–5543, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5511-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5511-2024, 2024
Short summary
Evaluating CHASER V4.0 global formaldehyde (HCHO) simulations using satellite, aircraft, and ground-based remote-sensing observations
Hossain Mohammed Syedul Hoque, Kengo Sudo, Hitoshi Irie, Yanfeng He, and Md Firoz Khan
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5545–5571, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5545-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5545-2024, 2024
Short summary
Global variable-resolution simulations of extreme precipitation over Henan, China, in 2021 with MPAS-Atmosphere v7.3
Zijun Liu, Li Dong, Zongxu Qiu, Xingrong Li, Huiling Yuan, Dongmei Meng, Xiaobin Qiu, Dingyuan Liang, and Yafei Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5477–5496, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5477-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5477-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Abuduwaili, J., Liu, D., and Wu, G.: Saline dust storms and their ecological impacts in arid regions, J. Arid Land, 2, 144–150, https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1227.2010.00144, 2010. 
Bergametti, G., Marticorena, B., Rajot, J. L., Foret, G., Alfaro, S. C., and Laurent, B.: Size-Resolved Dry Deposition Velocities of Dust Particles: In Situ Measurements and Parameterizations Testing, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 11080–11099, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028964, 2018. 
Binkowski, F. S. and Shankar, U.: The Regional Particulate Matter Model: 1. Model description and preliminary results, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 26191, https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD02093, 1995. 
Chamberlain, A. C.: Transport of Lycopodium spores and other small particles to rough surfaces, P. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. A., 296, 45–70, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1967.0005, 1967. 
Chen, F. and Dudhia, J.: Coupling an Advanced Land Surface–Hydrology Model with the Penn State–NCAR MM5 Modeling System. Part I: Model Implementation and Sensitivity, Mon. Weather Rev., 129, 569–585, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0569:CAALSH>2.0.CO;2, 2001. 
Download
Short summary
Dust aerosol can impact many processes of the Earth system, but large uncertainties still remain in dust simulations. In this study, we investigated dust simulation sensitivity to two dust emission schemes and three dry deposition schemes using WRF-Chem. An optimal combination of dry deposition scheme and dust emission scheme has been identified to best simulate the dust storm in comparison with observation. Our results highlight the importance of dry deposition schemes for dust simulation.