Articles | Volume 13, issue 4
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2125–2147, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2125-2020
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2125–2147, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2125-2020

Model evaluation paper 30 Apr 2020

Model evaluation paper | 30 Apr 2020

WRF-Chem v3.9 simulations of the East Asian dust storm in May 2017: modeling sensitivities to dust emission and dry deposition schemes

Yi Zeng et al.

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Svenja Lange on behalf of the Authors (20 Feb 2020)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (06 Mar 2020) by Samuel Remy
AR by Yi Zeng on behalf of the Authors (10 Mar 2020)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (24 Mar 2020) by Samuel Remy
Download
Short summary
Dust aerosol can impact many processes of the Earth system, but large uncertainties still remain in dust simulations. In this study, we investigated dust simulation sensitivity to two dust emission schemes and three dry deposition schemes using WRF-Chem. An optimal combination of dry deposition scheme and dust emission scheme has been identified to best simulate the dust storm in comparison with observation. Our results highlight the importance of dry deposition schemes for dust simulation.