Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
Articles | Volume 13, issue 4
Articles | Volume 13, issue 4
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2125–2147, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2125-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2125–2147, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2125-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 13, issue 4

Model evaluation paper 30 Apr 2020

Model evaluation paper | 30 Apr 2020

WRF-Chem v3.9 simulations of the East Asian dust storm in May 2017: modeling sensitivities to dust emission and dry deposition schemes

Yi Zeng et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 2,048 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,555 467 26 2,048 49 34 37
  • HTML: 1,555
  • PDF: 467
  • XML: 26
  • Total: 2,048
  • Supplement: 49
  • BibTeX: 34
  • EndNote: 37
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Nov 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 25 Nov 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,670 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,664 with geography defined and 6 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 18 Jun 2021
Download
Short summary
Dust aerosol can impact many processes of the Earth system, but large uncertainties still remain in dust simulations. In this study, we investigated dust simulation sensitivity to two dust emission schemes and three dry deposition schemes using WRF-Chem. An optimal combination of dry deposition scheme and dust emission scheme has been identified to best simulate the dust storm in comparison with observation. Our results highlight the importance of dry deposition schemes for dust simulation.
Read more