Articles | Volume 11, issue 7
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2581–2608, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2581-2018
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2581–2608, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2581-2018

Model experiment description paper 05 Jul 2018

Model experiment description paper | 05 Jul 2018

The Interactive Stratospheric Aerosol Model Intercomparison Project (ISA-MIP): motivation and experimental design

Claudia Timmreck et al.

Related authors

Simulation of ash clouds after a Laacher See-type eruption
Ulrike Niemeier, Felix Riede, and Claudia Timmreck
Clim. Past, 17, 633–652, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-633-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-633-2021, 2021
Short summary
Model physics and chemistry causing intermodel disagreement within the VolMIP-Tambora Interactive Stratospheric Aerosol ensemble
Margot Clyne, Jean-Francois Lamarque, Michael J. Mills, Myriam Khodri, William Ball, Slimane Bekki, Sandip S. Dhomse, Nicolas Lebas, Graham Mann, Lauren Marshall, Ulrike Niemeier, Virginie Poulain, Alan Robock, Eugene Rozanov, Anja Schmidt, Andrea Stenke, Timofei Sukhodolov, Claudia Timmreck, Matthew Toohey, Fiona Tummon, Davide Zanchettin, Yunqian Zhu, and Owen B. Toon
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 3317–3343, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3317-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3317-2021, 2021
Short summary
The unidentified volcanic eruption of 1809: why it remains a climatic cold case
Claudia Timmreck, Matthew Toohey, Davide Zanchettin, Stefan Brönnimann, Elin Lundstadt, and Rob Wilson
Clim. Past Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-2021-4,https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-2021-4, 2021
Preprint under review for CP
The Impact of Volcanic Eruptions of Different Magnitude on Stratospheric Water Vapour in the Tropics
Clarissa Alicia Kroll, Sally Dacie, Alon Azoulay, Hauke Schmidt, and Claudia Timmreck
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-1191,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-1191, 2020
Revised manuscript accepted for ACP
Short summary
Changes in stratospheric aerosol extinction coefficient after the 2018 Ambae eruption as seen by OMPS-LP and ECHAM5-HAM
Elizaveta Malinina, Alexei Rozanov, Ulrike Niemeier, Sandra Peglow, Carlo Arosio, Felix Wrana, Claudia Timmreck, Christian von Savigny, and John P. Burrows
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-749,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-749, 2020
Preprint under review for ACP
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Novel estimation of aerosol processes with particle size distribution measurements: a case study with the TOMAS algorithm v1.0.0
Dana L. McGuffin, Yuanlong Huang, Richard C. Flagan, Tuukka Petäjä, B. Erik Ydstie, and Peter J. Adams
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1821–1839, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1821-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1821-2021, 2021
Short summary
Evaluation of ECMWF IFS-AER (CAMS) operational forecasts during cycle 41r1–46r1 with calibrated ceilometer profiles over Germany
Harald Flentje, Ina Mattis, Zak Kipling, Samuel Rémy, and Werner Thomas
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1721–1751, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1721-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1721-2021, 2021
Short summary
Influence of biomass burning vapor wall loss correction on modeling organic aerosols in Europe by CAMx v6.50
Jianhui Jiang, Imad El Haddad, Sebnem Aksoyoglu, Giulia Stefenelli, Amelie Bertrand, Nicolas Marchand, Francesco Canonaco, Jean-Eudes Petit, Olivier Favez, Stefania Gilardoni, Urs Baltensperger, and André S. H. Prévôt
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1681–1697, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1681-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1681-2021, 2021
Short summary
Seasonal and diurnal performance of daily forecasts with WRF V3.8.1 over the United Arab Emirates
Oliver Branch, Thomas Schwitalla, Marouane Temimi, Ricardo Fonseca, Narendra Nelli, Michael Weston, Josipa Milovac, and Volker Wulfmeyer
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1615–1637, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1615-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1615-2021, 2021
Short summary
MLAir (v1.0) – a tool to enable fast and flexible machine learning on air data time series
Lukas Hubert Leufen, Felix Kleinert, and Martin G. Schultz
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1553–1574, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1553-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1553-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Andres, R. J. and Kasgnoc, A. D.: A time-averaged inventory of subaerial volcanic sulfur emissions, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 25251–25261, 1998. 
Antuña, J. C., Robock, A., Stenchikov, G. L., Thomason, L. W., and Barnes, J. E.: Lidar validation of SAGE II aerosol measurements after the 1991 Mount Pinatubo eruption, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4194, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001441, 2002. 
Aquila, V., Oman, L. D., Stolarski, R. S., Colarco, P. R., and Newman, P. A.: Dispersion of the volcanic sulfate cloud from a Mount Pinatubo-like eruption, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D06216, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016968, 2012. 
Aquila, V., Oman, L. D., Stolarski, R., Douglass, A. R., and Newman, P. A.: The Response of Ozone and Nitrogen Dioxide to the Eruption of Mt. Pinatubo at Southern and Northern Midlatitudes, J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 894–900, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0143.1, 2013. 
Aquila, V., Garfinkel, C. I., Newman, P., Oman, L. D., and Waugh, D. W.: Modifications of the quasi-biennial oscillation by a geoengineering perturbation of the stratospheric aerosol layer, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 1738–1744, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058818, 2014.