Articles | Volume 11, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2581-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2581-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Model experiment description paper
| 
05 Jul 2018
Model experiment description paper |
| 05 Jul 2018
| 05 Jul 2018
The Interactive Stratospheric Aerosol Model Intercomparison Project (ISA-MIP): motivation and experimental design
Claudia Timmreck
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Max-Planck-Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Graham W. Mann
School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
UK National Centre for Atmospheric Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Valentina Aquila
American University, Dept. of Environmental Science, Washington, DC, USA
Rene Hommel
Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
now at: Hommel & Graf Environmental, Hamburg, Göttingen, Germany
Lindsay A. Lee
School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Anja Schmidt
Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, UK
Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Downing Place, Cambridge, CB2 3EN, UK
Christoph Brühl
Max-Planck-Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany
Simon Carn
Dept. Geo. Min. Eng. Sci. MTU, Houghton, MI, USA
Mian Chin
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA
Sandip S. Dhomse
School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Thomas Diehl
Directorate for Sustainable Resources, Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Ispra, Italy
Jason M. English
University of Colorado, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, Boulder, CO, USA
NOAA Earth Systems Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA
Michael J. Mills
Atmospheric Chemistry Observations and Modeling, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
Ryan Neely
School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
UK National Centre for Atmospheric Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Jianxiong Sheng
ETHZ, Zurich, Switzerland
John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
Matthew Toohey
Max-Planck-Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research, Kiel, Germany
Debra Weisenstein
John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
Viewed
Total article views: 8,486 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 09 Jan 2018)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5,051 | 3,205 | 230 | 8,486 | 817 | 169 | 167 |
- HTML: 5,051
- PDF: 3,205
- XML: 230
- Total: 8,486
- Supplement: 817
- BibTeX: 169
- EndNote: 167
Total article views: 6,084 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 05 Jul 2018)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3,859 | 2,026 | 199 | 6,084 | 526 | 153 | 139 |
- HTML: 3,859
- PDF: 2,026
- XML: 199
- Total: 6,084
- Supplement: 526
- BibTeX: 153
- EndNote: 139
Total article views: 2,402 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 09 Jan 2018)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,192 | 1,179 | 31 | 2,402 | 291 | 16 | 28 |
- HTML: 1,192
- PDF: 1,179
- XML: 31
- Total: 2,402
- Supplement: 291
- BibTeX: 16
- EndNote: 28
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 8,486 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 8,053 with geography defined
and 433 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 6,084 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 5,727 with geography defined
and 357 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,402 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,326 with geography defined
and 76 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
67 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Recent advances and future avenues in examining the impacts of volcanic aerosols on climate T. Zhou et al. 10.1360/TB-2023-0140
- Stratospheric residence time and the lifetime of volcanic stratospheric aerosols M. Toohey et al. 10.5194/acp-25-3821-2025
- A New Volcanic Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosol Forcing Emulator (EVA_H): Comparison With Interactive Stratospheric Aerosol Models T. Aubry et al. 10.1029/2019JD031303
- The potential impacts of a sulfur- and halogen-rich supereruption such as Los Chocoyos on the atmosphere and climate H. Brenna et al. 10.5194/acp-20-6521-2020
- Large Variations in Volcanic Aerosol Forcing Efficiency Due to Eruption Source Parameters and Rapid Adjustments L. Marshall et al. 10.1029/2020GL090241
- The impact of volcanic eruptions of different magnitude on stratospheric water vapor in the tropics C. Kroll et al. 10.5194/acp-21-6565-2021
- Unknown Eruption Source Parameters Cause Large Uncertainty in Historical Volcanic Radiative Forcing Reconstructions L. Marshall et al. 10.1029/2020JD033578
- Volcanic Radiative Forcing From 1979 to 2015 A. Schmidt et al. 10.1029/2018JD028776
- The Recovery and Re-Calibration of a 13-Month Aerosol Extinction Profiles Dataset from Searchlight Observations from New Mexico, after the 1963 Agung Eruption J. Antuña-Marrero et al. 10.3390/atmos15060635
- The January 2022 Hunga eruption cooled the southern hemisphere in 2022 and 2023 A. Gupta et al. 10.1038/s43247-025-02181-9
- Extreme Solar Events: Setting up a Paradigm I. Usoskin et al. 10.1007/s11214-023-01018-1
- Last-millennium volcanic forcing and climate response using SO2 emissions L. Marshall et al. 10.5194/cp-21-161-2025
- Initial atmospheric conditions control transport of volcanic volatiles, forcing and impacts Z. Zhuo et al. 10.5194/acp-24-6233-2024
- Atmosphere–ocean–aerosol–chemistry–climate model SOCOLv4.0: description and evaluation T. Sukhodolov et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-5525-2021
- Volcanic forcing of high-latitude Northern Hemisphere eruptions H. Fuglestvedt et al. 10.1038/s41612-023-00539-4
- OMPS-LP aerosol extinction coefficients and their applicability in GloSSAC M. Kovilakam et al. 10.5194/acp-25-535-2025
- Response to Comment on “No consistent ENSO response to volcanic forcing over the last millennium” S. Dee et al. 10.1126/science.abc1733
- Validating a microphysical prognostic stratospheric aerosol implementation in E3SMv2 using observations after the Mount Pinatubo eruption H. Brown et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-5087-2024
- Volcanic Drivers of Stratospheric Sulfur in GFDL ESM4 C. Gao et al. 10.1029/2022MS003532
- New submodel for emissions from Explosive Volcanic ERuptions (EVER v1.1) within the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy, version 2.55.1) M. Kohl et al. 10.5194/gmd-18-3985-2025
- Decadal Disruption of the QBO by Tropical Volcanic Supereruptions H. Brenna et al. 10.1029/2020GL089687
- Interactive Stratospheric Aerosol Microphysics‐Chemistry Simulations of the 1991 Pinatubo Volcanic Aerosols With Newly Coupled Sectional Aerosol and Stratosphere‐Troposphere Chemistry Modules in the NASA GEOS Chemistry‐Climate Model (CCM) P. Case et al. 10.1029/2022MS003147
- The impact of stratospheric aerosol heating on the frozen hydrometeor transport pathways in the tropical tropopause layer C. Kroll et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ad33d0
- Improved tropospheric and stratospheric sulfur cycle in the aerosol–chemistry–climate model SOCOL-AERv2 A. Feinberg et al. 10.5194/gmd-12-3863-2019
- Injecting solid particles into the stratosphere could mitigate global warming but currently entails great uncertainties S. Vattioni et al. 10.1038/s43247-025-02038-1
- SALSA2.0: The sectional aerosol module of the aerosol–chemistry–climate model ECHAM6.3.0-HAM2.3-MOZ1.0 H. Kokkola et al. 10.5194/gmd-11-3833-2018
- Documenting numerical experiments in support of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) C. Pascoe et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-2149-2020
- Interactive stratospheric aerosol models' response to different amounts and altitudes of SO2 injection during the 1991 Pinatubo eruption I. Quaglia et al. 10.5194/acp-23-921-2023
- An interactive stratospheric aerosol model intercomparison of solar geoengineering by stratospheric injection of SO2 or accumulation-mode sulfuric acid aerosols D. Weisenstein et al. 10.5194/acp-22-2955-2022
- Data supporting the North Atlantic Climate System Integrated Study (ACSIS) programme, including atmospheric composition; oceanographic and sea-ice observations (2016–2022); and output from ocean, atmosphere, land, and sea-ice models (1950–2050) A. Archibald et al. 10.5194/essd-17-135-2025
- Fingerprints of past volcanic eruptions can be detected in historical climate records using machine learning J. Meuer et al. 10.1038/s43247-024-01617-y
- Importance of microphysical settings for climate forcing by stratospheric SO2 injections as modeled by SOCOL-AERv2 S. Vattioni et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-4181-2024
- Limitations of assuming internal mixing between different aerosol species: a case study with sulfate geoengineering simulations D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-22-1739-2022
- Evaluating the simulated radiative forcings, aerosol properties, and stratospheric warmings from the 1963 Mt Agung, 1982 El Chichón, and 1991 Mt Pinatubo volcanic aerosol clouds S. Dhomse et al. 10.5194/acp-20-13627-2020
- The significance of volcanic ash in Greenland ice cores during the Common Era G. Plunkett et al. 10.1016/j.quascirev.2022.107936
- Stratospheric Ozone Changes From Explosive Tropical Volcanoes: Modeling and Ice Core Constraints A. Ming et al. 10.1029/2019JD032290
- Climate change modulates the stratospheric volcanic sulfate aerosol lifecycle and radiative forcing from tropical eruptions T. Aubry et al. 10.1038/s41467-021-24943-7
- Modeling the Sulfate Aerosol Evolution After Recent Moderate Volcanic Activity, 2008–2012 C. Brodowsky et al. 10.1029/2021JD035472
- The Effect of Using a New Parameterization of Nucleation in the WRF-Chem Model on New Particle Formation in a Passive Volcanic Plume S. Arghavani et al. 10.3390/atmos13010015
- Key Gaps in Models' Physical Representation of Climate Intervention and Its Impacts S. Eastham et al. 10.1029/2024MS004872
- Model physics and chemistry causing intermodel disagreement within the VolMIP-Tambora Interactive Stratospheric Aerosol ensemble M. Clyne et al. 10.5194/acp-21-3317-2021
- Volcanic effects on climate: recent advances and future avenues L. Marshall et al. 10.1007/s00445-022-01559-3
- Methodology to obtain highly resolved SO2 vertical profiles for representation of volcanic emissions in climate models O. Sandvik et al. 10.5194/amt-14-7153-2021
- Climate response to off-equatorial stratospheric sulfur injections in three Earth system models – Part 1: Experimental protocols and surface changes D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-663-2023
- How Does a Pinatubo‐Size Volcanic Cloud Reach the Middle Stratosphere? G. Stenchikov et al. 10.1029/2020JD033829
- The effect of ash, water vapor, and heterogeneous chemistry on the evolution of a Pinatubo-size volcanic cloud M. Abdelkader et al. 10.5194/acp-23-471-2023
- Exploring accumulation-mode H2SO4 versus SO2 stratospheric sulfate geoengineering in a sectional aerosol–chemistry–climate model S. Vattioni et al. 10.5194/acp-19-4877-2019
- Climate Projections Very Likely Underestimate Future Volcanic Forcing and Its Climatic Effects M. Chim et al. 10.1029/2023GL103743
- Understanding Model‐Observation Discrepancies in Satellite Retrievals of Atmospheric Temperature Using GISS ModelE M. Casas et al. 10.1029/2022JD037523
- Quantifying CanESM5 and EAMv1 sensitivities to Mt. Pinatubo volcanic forcing for the CMIP6 historical experiment L. Rieger et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-4831-2020
- Low‐Altitude High‐Latitude Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Is Feasible With Existing Aircraft A. Duffey et al. 10.1029/2024EF005567
- Estimating the Effect of Radiative Feedback Uncertainties on Climate Response to Changes in the Concentration of Stratospheric Aerosols S. Soldatenko 10.3390/atmos11060654
- Analysis of the global atmospheric background sulfur budget in a multi-model framework C. Brodowsky et al. 10.5194/acp-24-5513-2024
- Indirect stratospheric moisture increase after a Pinatubo-magnitude eruption can be comparable to direct increase after 2022 Hunga C. Kroll & A. Schmidt 10.1038/s43247-024-01651-w
- Recovery of the first ever multi-year lidar dataset of the stratospheric aerosol layer, from Lexington, MA, and Fairbanks, AK, January 1964 to July 1965 J. Antuña-Marrero et al. 10.5194/essd-13-4407-2021
- Reconstructing volcanic radiative forcing since 1990, using a comprehensive emission inventory and spatially resolved sulfur injections from satellite data in a chemistry-climate model J. Schallock et al. 10.5194/acp-23-1169-2023
- Identifying the sources of uncertainty in climate model simulations of solar radiation modification with the G6sulfur and G6solar Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) simulations D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-21-10039-2021
- Opinion: The scientific and community-building roles of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) – past, present, and future D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5149-2023
- The Global Space-based Stratospheric Aerosol Climatology (version 2.0): 1979–2018 M. Kovilakam et al. 10.5194/essd-12-2607-2020
- Impact of SO2 injection profiles on simulated volcanic forcing for the 2009 Sarychev eruptions – investigating the importance of using high-vertical-resolution methods when compiling SO2 data E. Axebrink et al. 10.5194/acp-25-2047-2025
- Uncertainty and the basis for confidence in solar geoengineering research B. Kravitz & D. MacMartin 10.1038/s43017-019-0004-7
- Stratospheric aerosol radiative forcing simulated by the chemistry climate model EMAC using Aerosol CCI satellite data C. Brühl et al. 10.5194/acp-18-12845-2018
- Potential of future stratospheric ozone loss in the midlatitudes under global warming and sulfate geoengineering S. Robrecht et al. 10.5194/acp-21-2427-2021
- Effects of forcing differences and initial conditions on inter-model agreement in the VolMIP volc-pinatubo-full experiment D. Zanchettin et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-2265-2022
- Impacts of major volcanic eruptions over the past two millennia on both global and Chinese climates: A review W. Sun et al. 10.1007/s11430-022-1218-0
- Stratospheric aerosol evolution after Pinatubo simulated with a coupled size-resolved aerosol–chemistry–climate model, SOCOL-AERv1.0 T. Sukhodolov et al. 10.5194/gmd-11-2633-2018
- Exploring How Eruption Source Parameters Affect Volcanic Radiative Forcing Using Statistical Emulation L. Marshall et al. 10.1029/2018JD028675
65 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Recent advances and future avenues in examining the impacts of volcanic aerosols on climate T. Zhou et al. 10.1360/TB-2023-0140
- Stratospheric residence time and the lifetime of volcanic stratospheric aerosols M. Toohey et al. 10.5194/acp-25-3821-2025
- A New Volcanic Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosol Forcing Emulator (EVA_H): Comparison With Interactive Stratospheric Aerosol Models T. Aubry et al. 10.1029/2019JD031303
- The potential impacts of a sulfur- and halogen-rich supereruption such as Los Chocoyos on the atmosphere and climate H. Brenna et al. 10.5194/acp-20-6521-2020
- Large Variations in Volcanic Aerosol Forcing Efficiency Due to Eruption Source Parameters and Rapid Adjustments L. Marshall et al. 10.1029/2020GL090241
- The impact of volcanic eruptions of different magnitude on stratospheric water vapor in the tropics C. Kroll et al. 10.5194/acp-21-6565-2021
- Unknown Eruption Source Parameters Cause Large Uncertainty in Historical Volcanic Radiative Forcing Reconstructions L. Marshall et al. 10.1029/2020JD033578
- Volcanic Radiative Forcing From 1979 to 2015 A. Schmidt et al. 10.1029/2018JD028776
- The Recovery and Re-Calibration of a 13-Month Aerosol Extinction Profiles Dataset from Searchlight Observations from New Mexico, after the 1963 Agung Eruption J. Antuña-Marrero et al. 10.3390/atmos15060635
- The January 2022 Hunga eruption cooled the southern hemisphere in 2022 and 2023 A. Gupta et al. 10.1038/s43247-025-02181-9
- Extreme Solar Events: Setting up a Paradigm I. Usoskin et al. 10.1007/s11214-023-01018-1
- Last-millennium volcanic forcing and climate response using SO2 emissions L. Marshall et al. 10.5194/cp-21-161-2025
- Initial atmospheric conditions control transport of volcanic volatiles, forcing and impacts Z. Zhuo et al. 10.5194/acp-24-6233-2024
- Atmosphere–ocean–aerosol–chemistry–climate model SOCOLv4.0: description and evaluation T. Sukhodolov et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-5525-2021
- Volcanic forcing of high-latitude Northern Hemisphere eruptions H. Fuglestvedt et al. 10.1038/s41612-023-00539-4
- OMPS-LP aerosol extinction coefficients and their applicability in GloSSAC M. Kovilakam et al. 10.5194/acp-25-535-2025
- Response to Comment on “No consistent ENSO response to volcanic forcing over the last millennium” S. Dee et al. 10.1126/science.abc1733
- Validating a microphysical prognostic stratospheric aerosol implementation in E3SMv2 using observations after the Mount Pinatubo eruption H. Brown et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-5087-2024
- Volcanic Drivers of Stratospheric Sulfur in GFDL ESM4 C. Gao et al. 10.1029/2022MS003532
- New submodel for emissions from Explosive Volcanic ERuptions (EVER v1.1) within the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy, version 2.55.1) M. Kohl et al. 10.5194/gmd-18-3985-2025
- Decadal Disruption of the QBO by Tropical Volcanic Supereruptions H. Brenna et al. 10.1029/2020GL089687
- Interactive Stratospheric Aerosol Microphysics‐Chemistry Simulations of the 1991 Pinatubo Volcanic Aerosols With Newly Coupled Sectional Aerosol and Stratosphere‐Troposphere Chemistry Modules in the NASA GEOS Chemistry‐Climate Model (CCM) P. Case et al. 10.1029/2022MS003147
- The impact of stratospheric aerosol heating on the frozen hydrometeor transport pathways in the tropical tropopause layer C. Kroll et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ad33d0
- Improved tropospheric and stratospheric sulfur cycle in the aerosol–chemistry–climate model SOCOL-AERv2 A. Feinberg et al. 10.5194/gmd-12-3863-2019
- Injecting solid particles into the stratosphere could mitigate global warming but currently entails great uncertainties S. Vattioni et al. 10.1038/s43247-025-02038-1
- SALSA2.0: The sectional aerosol module of the aerosol–chemistry–climate model ECHAM6.3.0-HAM2.3-MOZ1.0 H. Kokkola et al. 10.5194/gmd-11-3833-2018
- Documenting numerical experiments in support of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) C. Pascoe et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-2149-2020
- Interactive stratospheric aerosol models' response to different amounts and altitudes of SO2 injection during the 1991 Pinatubo eruption I. Quaglia et al. 10.5194/acp-23-921-2023
- An interactive stratospheric aerosol model intercomparison of solar geoengineering by stratospheric injection of SO2 or accumulation-mode sulfuric acid aerosols D. Weisenstein et al. 10.5194/acp-22-2955-2022
- Data supporting the North Atlantic Climate System Integrated Study (ACSIS) programme, including atmospheric composition; oceanographic and sea-ice observations (2016–2022); and output from ocean, atmosphere, land, and sea-ice models (1950–2050) A. Archibald et al. 10.5194/essd-17-135-2025
- Fingerprints of past volcanic eruptions can be detected in historical climate records using machine learning J. Meuer et al. 10.1038/s43247-024-01617-y
- Importance of microphysical settings for climate forcing by stratospheric SO2 injections as modeled by SOCOL-AERv2 S. Vattioni et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-4181-2024
- Limitations of assuming internal mixing between different aerosol species: a case study with sulfate geoengineering simulations D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-22-1739-2022
- Evaluating the simulated radiative forcings, aerosol properties, and stratospheric warmings from the 1963 Mt Agung, 1982 El Chichón, and 1991 Mt Pinatubo volcanic aerosol clouds S. Dhomse et al. 10.5194/acp-20-13627-2020
- The significance of volcanic ash in Greenland ice cores during the Common Era G. Plunkett et al. 10.1016/j.quascirev.2022.107936
- Stratospheric Ozone Changes From Explosive Tropical Volcanoes: Modeling and Ice Core Constraints A. Ming et al. 10.1029/2019JD032290
- Climate change modulates the stratospheric volcanic sulfate aerosol lifecycle and radiative forcing from tropical eruptions T. Aubry et al. 10.1038/s41467-021-24943-7
- Modeling the Sulfate Aerosol Evolution After Recent Moderate Volcanic Activity, 2008–2012 C. Brodowsky et al. 10.1029/2021JD035472
- The Effect of Using a New Parameterization of Nucleation in the WRF-Chem Model on New Particle Formation in a Passive Volcanic Plume S. Arghavani et al. 10.3390/atmos13010015
- Key Gaps in Models' Physical Representation of Climate Intervention and Its Impacts S. Eastham et al. 10.1029/2024MS004872
- Model physics and chemistry causing intermodel disagreement within the VolMIP-Tambora Interactive Stratospheric Aerosol ensemble M. Clyne et al. 10.5194/acp-21-3317-2021
- Volcanic effects on climate: recent advances and future avenues L. Marshall et al. 10.1007/s00445-022-01559-3
- Methodology to obtain highly resolved SO2 vertical profiles for representation of volcanic emissions in climate models O. Sandvik et al. 10.5194/amt-14-7153-2021
- Climate response to off-equatorial stratospheric sulfur injections in three Earth system models – Part 1: Experimental protocols and surface changes D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-663-2023
- How Does a Pinatubo‐Size Volcanic Cloud Reach the Middle Stratosphere? G. Stenchikov et al. 10.1029/2020JD033829
- The effect of ash, water vapor, and heterogeneous chemistry on the evolution of a Pinatubo-size volcanic cloud M. Abdelkader et al. 10.5194/acp-23-471-2023
- Exploring accumulation-mode H2SO4 versus SO2 stratospheric sulfate geoengineering in a sectional aerosol–chemistry–climate model S. Vattioni et al. 10.5194/acp-19-4877-2019
- Climate Projections Very Likely Underestimate Future Volcanic Forcing and Its Climatic Effects M. Chim et al. 10.1029/2023GL103743
- Understanding Model‐Observation Discrepancies in Satellite Retrievals of Atmospheric Temperature Using GISS ModelE M. Casas et al. 10.1029/2022JD037523
- Quantifying CanESM5 and EAMv1 sensitivities to Mt. Pinatubo volcanic forcing for the CMIP6 historical experiment L. Rieger et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-4831-2020
- Low‐Altitude High‐Latitude Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Is Feasible With Existing Aircraft A. Duffey et al. 10.1029/2024EF005567
- Estimating the Effect of Radiative Feedback Uncertainties on Climate Response to Changes in the Concentration of Stratospheric Aerosols S. Soldatenko 10.3390/atmos11060654
- Analysis of the global atmospheric background sulfur budget in a multi-model framework C. Brodowsky et al. 10.5194/acp-24-5513-2024
- Indirect stratospheric moisture increase after a Pinatubo-magnitude eruption can be comparable to direct increase after 2022 Hunga C. Kroll & A. Schmidt 10.1038/s43247-024-01651-w
- Recovery of the first ever multi-year lidar dataset of the stratospheric aerosol layer, from Lexington, MA, and Fairbanks, AK, January 1964 to July 1965 J. Antuña-Marrero et al. 10.5194/essd-13-4407-2021
- Reconstructing volcanic radiative forcing since 1990, using a comprehensive emission inventory and spatially resolved sulfur injections from satellite data in a chemistry-climate model J. Schallock et al. 10.5194/acp-23-1169-2023
- Identifying the sources of uncertainty in climate model simulations of solar radiation modification with the G6sulfur and G6solar Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) simulations D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-21-10039-2021
- Opinion: The scientific and community-building roles of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) – past, present, and future D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5149-2023
- The Global Space-based Stratospheric Aerosol Climatology (version 2.0): 1979–2018 M. Kovilakam et al. 10.5194/essd-12-2607-2020
- Impact of SO2 injection profiles on simulated volcanic forcing for the 2009 Sarychev eruptions – investigating the importance of using high-vertical-resolution methods when compiling SO2 data E. Axebrink et al. 10.5194/acp-25-2047-2025
- Uncertainty and the basis for confidence in solar geoengineering research B. Kravitz & D. MacMartin 10.1038/s43017-019-0004-7
- Stratospheric aerosol radiative forcing simulated by the chemistry climate model EMAC using Aerosol CCI satellite data C. Brühl et al. 10.5194/acp-18-12845-2018
- Potential of future stratospheric ozone loss in the midlatitudes under global warming and sulfate geoengineering S. Robrecht et al. 10.5194/acp-21-2427-2021
- Effects of forcing differences and initial conditions on inter-model agreement in the VolMIP volc-pinatubo-full experiment D. Zanchettin et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-2265-2022
- Impacts of major volcanic eruptions over the past two millennia on both global and Chinese climates: A review W. Sun et al. 10.1007/s11430-022-1218-0
2 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Stratospheric aerosol evolution after Pinatubo simulated with a coupled size-resolved aerosol–chemistry–climate model, SOCOL-AERv1.0 T. Sukhodolov et al. 10.5194/gmd-11-2633-2018
- Exploring How Eruption Source Parameters Affect Volcanic Radiative Forcing Using Statistical Emulation L. Marshall et al. 10.1029/2018JD028675
Latest update: 14 Jul 2025
Short summary
The paper describes the experimental design of the Interactive Stratospheric Aerosol Model Intercomparison Project (ISA-MIP). ISA-MIP will improve understanding of stratospheric aerosol processes, chemistry, and dynamics and constrain climate impacts of background aerosol variability and small and large volcanic eruptions. It will help to asses the stratospheric aerosol contribution to the early 21st century global warming hiatus period and the effects from hypothetical geoengineering schemes.
The paper describes the experimental design of the Interactive Stratospheric Aerosol Model...
