Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 5.240
IF5.240
IF 5-year value: 5.768
IF 5-year
5.768
CiteScore value: 8.9
CiteScore
8.9
SNIP value: 1.713
SNIP1.713
IPP value: 5.53
IPP5.53
SJR value: 3.18
SJR3.18
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 71
Scimago H
index
71
h5-index value: 51
h5-index51
Volume 11, issue 3
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1133–1160, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1133-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1133–1160, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1133-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Model experiment description paper 29 Mar 2018

Model experiment description paper | 29 Mar 2018

The Carbon Dioxide Removal Model Intercomparison Project (CDRMIP): rationale and experimental protocol for CMIP6

David P. Keller et al.

Related authors

Evaluation of the University of Victoria Earth System Climate Model version 2.10 (UVic ESCM 2.10)
Nadine Mengis, David P. Keller, Andrew H. MacDougall, Michael Eby, Nesha Wright, Katrin J. Meissner, Andreas Oschlies, Andreas Schmittner, Alexander J. MacIsaac, H. Damon Matthews, and Kirsten Zickfeld
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4183–4204, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4183-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4183-2020, 2020
Short summary
Explicit silicate cycling in the Kiel Marine Biogeochemistry Model, version 3 (KMBM3) embedded in the UVic ESCM version 2.9
Karin Kvale, David P. Keller, Wolfgang Koeve, Katrin J. Meissner, Chris Somes, Wanxuan Yao, and Andreas Oschlies
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-235,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-235, 2020
Preprint under review for GMD
Short summary
Meeting climate targets by direct CO2 injections: what price would the ocean have to pay?
Fabian Reith, Wolfgang Koeve, David P. Keller, Julia Getzlaff, and Andreas Oschlies
Earth Syst. Dynam., 10, 711–727, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-10-711-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-10-711-2019, 2019
Short summary
Assessing carbon dioxide removal through global and regional ocean alkalinization under high and low emission pathways
Andrew Lenton, Richard J. Matear, David P. Keller, Vivian Scott, and Naomi E. Vaughan
Earth Syst. Dynam., 9, 339–357, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-339-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-339-2018, 2018
Short summary
Systematic Correlation Matrix Evaluation (SCoMaE) – a bottom–up, science-led approach to identifying indicators
Nadine Mengis, David P. Keller, and Andreas Oschlies
Earth Syst. Dynam., 9, 15–31, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-15-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-15-2018, 2018
Short summary

Related subject area

Climate and Earth System Modeling
The E3SM version 1 single-column model
Peter A. Bogenschutz, Shuaiqi Tang, Peter M. Caldwell, Shaocheng Xie, Wuyin Lin, and Yao-Sheng Chen
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4443–4458, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4443-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4443-2020, 2020
Short summary
RadNet 1.0: exploring deep learning architectures for longwave radiative transfer
Ying Liu, Rodrigo Caballero, and Joy Merwin Monteiro
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4399–4412, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4399-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4399-2020, 2020
Short summary
Efficient ensemble data assimilation for coupled models with the Parallel Data Assimilation Framework: example of AWI-CM (AWI-CM-PDAF 1.0)
Lars Nerger, Qi Tang, and Longjiang Mu
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4305–4321, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4305-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4305-2020, 2020
Short summary
Modelling mineral dust emissions and atmospheric dispersion with MADE3 in EMAC v2.54
Christof G. Beer, Johannes Hendricks, Mattia Righi, Bernd Heinold, Ina Tegen, Silke Groß, Daniel Sauer, Adrian Walser, and Bernadett Weinzierl
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4287–4303, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4287-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4287-2020, 2020
Short summary
Evaluation of the University of Victoria Earth System Climate Model version 2.10 (UVic ESCM 2.10)
Nadine Mengis, David P. Keller, Andrew H. MacDougall, Michael Eby, Nesha Wright, Katrin J. Meissner, Andreas Oschlies, Andreas Schmittner, Alexander J. MacIsaac, H. Damon Matthews, and Kirsten Zickfeld
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4183–4204, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4183-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4183-2020, 2020
Short summary

Cited articles

Allen, M. R., Frame, D. J., Huntingford, C., Jones, C. D., Lowe, J. A., Meinshausen, M., and Meinshausen, N.: Warming caused by cumulative carbon emissions towards the trillionth tonne, Nature, 458, 1163–1166, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08019, 2009.
Armour, K. C., Eisenman, I., Blanchard-Wrigglesworth, E., McCusker, K. E., and Bitz, C. M.: The reversibility of sea ice loss in a state-of-the-art climate model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048739, 2011.
Arora, V. K. and Boer, G. J.: Terrestrial ecosystems response to future changes in climate and atmospheric CO2 concentration, Biogeosciences, 11, 4157–4171, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-4157-2014, 2014.
Betts, R. A.: Offset of the potential carbon sink from boreal forestation by decreases in surface albedo, Nature, 409, 187–190, 2000.
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
There is little consensus on the impacts and efficacy of proposed carbon dioxide removal (CDR) methods as a potential means of mitigating climate change. To address this need, the Carbon Dioxide Removal Model Intercomparison Project (or CDR-MIP) has been initiated. This project brings together models of the Earth system in a common framework to explore the potential, impacts, and challenges of CDR. Here, we describe the first set of CDR-MIP experiments.
There is little consensus on the impacts and efficacy of proposed carbon dioxide removal (CDR)...
Citation