Articles | Volume 8, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3837-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3837-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Development and technical paper
| 
08 Dec 2015
Development and technical paper |
| 08 Dec 2015
Variability of phenology and fluxes of water and carbon with observed and simulated soil moisture in the Ent Terrestrial Biosphere Model (Ent TBM version 1.0.1.0.0)
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul 120-749, South Korea
P. R. Moorcroft
Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
I. Aleinov
Center for Climate Systems Research, Columbia University, New York, NY 10025, USA
M. J. Puma
Center for Climate Systems Research, Columbia University, New York, NY 10025, USA
N. Y. Kiang
NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, NY 10025, USA
Related authors
Jungho Seo, Mahdi Panahi, Ji Hyun Kim, Sayed M. Bateni, and Yeonjoo Kim
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-349, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-349, 2025
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Short summary
This study introduces a machine learning-based daily global gridded snow water equivalent (SWE) product (SWEML) at 0.25° from 1980 to 2020. Comparison of SWEML to other global SWE datasets showed that SWEML exhibited high accuracy, especially in mountainous and high-elevation areas, such as the Rocky Mountains in the US. In addition, SWEML effectively depicted snow accumulation during winters and snow melting during springs.
Gab Abramowitz, Anna Ukkola, Sanaa Hobeichi, Jon Cranko Page, Mathew Lipson, Martin G. De Kauwe, Samuel Green, Claire Brenner, Jonathan Frame, Grey Nearing, Martyn Clark, Martin Best, Peter Anthoni, Gabriele Arduini, Souhail Boussetta, Silvia Caldararu, Kyeungwoo Cho, Matthias Cuntz, David Fairbairn, Craig R. Ferguson, Hyungjun Kim, Yeonjoo Kim, Jürgen Knauer, David Lawrence, Xiangzhong Luo, Sergey Malyshev, Tomoko Nitta, Jerome Ogee, Keith Oleson, Catherine Ottlé, Phillipe Peylin, Patricia de Rosnay, Heather Rumbold, Bob Su, Nicolas Vuichard, Anthony P. Walker, Xiaoni Wang-Faivre, Yunfei Wang, and Yijian Zeng
Biogeosciences, 21, 5517–5538, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5517-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5517-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper evaluates land models – computer-based models that simulate ecosystem dynamics; land carbon, water, and energy cycles; and the role of land in the climate system. It uses machine learning and AI approaches to show that, despite the complexity of land models, they do not perform nearly as well as they could given the amount of information they are provided with about the prediction problem.
Hocheol Seo and Yeonjoo Kim
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4699–4713, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4699-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4699-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Wildfire is a crucial factor in carbon and water fluxes on the Earth system. About 2.1 Pg of carbon is released into the atmosphere by wildfires annually. Because the fire processes are still limitedly represented in land surface models, we forced the daily GFED4 burned area into the land surface model over Alaska and Siberia. The results with the GFED4 burned area significantly improved the simulated carbon emissions and net ecosystem exchange compared to the default simulation.
Suyeon Choi and Yeonjoo Kim
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5967–5985, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5967-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5967-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Here we present the cGAN-based precipitation nowcasting model, named Rad-cGAN, trained to predict a radar reflectivity map with a lead time of 10 min. Rad-cGAN showed superior performance at a lead time of up to 90 min compared with the reference models. Furthermore, we demonstrate the successful implementation of the transfer learning strategies using pre-trained Rad-cGAN to develop the models for different dam domains.
Abigail L. S. Swann, Charles D. Koven, Cristian Proistosecu, Rosie A. Fisher, Benjamin M. Sanderson, Victor Brovkin, Tomohiro Hajima, Chris D. Jones, Nancy Y. Kiang, David M. Lawrence, Spencer Liddicoat, Hannah Liddy, Anastasia Romanou, Roland Séférian, Lori T. Sentman, Norman J. Steinert, Jerry Tjiputra, and Tilo Ziehn
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1673, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1673, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We analyzed simulations from Earth system models (ESM) with a constant rate of emissions, zero emissions, and negative emissions of CO2 to quantify the response of land carbon sinks. We found that under positive emissions vegetation in the tropics gained carbon. Under zero emissions and negative emissions most ESMs lost carbon from vegetation in the tropics but gained carbon in mid- and high-latitudes, mostly in soils. Our findings imply that tropical carbon is vulnerable under zero emissions.
Anastasia Romanou, Paul Lerner, Nancy Kiang, Igor Aleinov, Maxwell Kelley, Roland Miller, Gary Russell, Reto Ruedy, Gavin Schmidt, Maria Hakuba, and Ou Wang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4839, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4839, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
NASA GISS latest Earth System model description and evaluation paper. Major highlights is the capability to include complex interactions of the different components of the Earth System. The model compares well with observations but has shortcomings due to biases that propagate throughout the system between different components.
Kostas Tsigaridis, Andrew S. Ackerman, Igor Aleinov, Mark A. Chandler, Thomas L. Clune, Christopher M. Colose, Anthony D. Del Genio, Maxwell Kelley, Nancy Y. Kiang, Anthony Leboissetier, Jan P. Perlwitz, Reto A. Ruedy, Gary L. Russell, Linda E. Sohl, Michael J. Way, and Eric T. Wolf
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 5825–5871, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-5825-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-5825-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We present the second generation of ROCKE-3D (Resolving Orbital and Climate Keys of Earth and Extraterrestrial Environments with Dynamics), a generalized three-dimensional model for use in Solar System and exoplanetary simulations of rocky planet climates. We quantify how the different component choices affect model results and discuss strengths and limitations of using each component, together with how one can select which component to use. ROCKE-3D is publicly available, and tutorial sessions are available for the community, greatly facilitating its use by any interested group.
Jungho Seo, Mahdi Panahi, Ji Hyun Kim, Sayed M. Bateni, and Yeonjoo Kim
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-349, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-349, 2025
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Short summary
This study introduces a machine learning-based daily global gridded snow water equivalent (SWE) product (SWEML) at 0.25° from 1980 to 2020. Comparison of SWEML to other global SWE datasets showed that SWEML exhibited high accuracy, especially in mountainous and high-elevation areas, such as the Rocky Mountains in the US. In addition, SWEML effectively depicted snow accumulation during winters and snow melting during springs.
Yona Silvy, Thomas L. Frölicher, Jens Terhaar, Fortunat Joos, Friedrich A. Burger, Fabrice Lacroix, Myles Allen, Raffaele Bernardello, Laurent Bopp, Victor Brovkin, Jonathan R. Buzan, Patricia Cadule, Martin Dix, John Dunne, Pierre Friedlingstein, Goran Georgievski, Tomohiro Hajima, Stuart Jenkins, Michio Kawamiya, Nancy Y. Kiang, Vladimir Lapin, Donghyun Lee, Paul Lerner, Nadine Mengis, Estela A. Monteiro, David Paynter, Glen P. Peters, Anastasia Romanou, Jörg Schwinger, Sarah Sparrow, Eric Stofferahn, Jerry Tjiputra, Etienne Tourigny, and Tilo Ziehn
Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 1591–1628, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1591-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1591-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The adaptive emission reduction approach is applied with Earth system models to generate temperature stabilization simulations. These simulations provide compatible emission pathways and budgets for a given warming level, uncovering uncertainty ranges previously missing in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project scenarios. These target-based emission-driven simulations offer a more coherent assessment across models for studying both the carbon cycle and its impacts under climate stabilization.
Gab Abramowitz, Anna Ukkola, Sanaa Hobeichi, Jon Cranko Page, Mathew Lipson, Martin G. De Kauwe, Samuel Green, Claire Brenner, Jonathan Frame, Grey Nearing, Martyn Clark, Martin Best, Peter Anthoni, Gabriele Arduini, Souhail Boussetta, Silvia Caldararu, Kyeungwoo Cho, Matthias Cuntz, David Fairbairn, Craig R. Ferguson, Hyungjun Kim, Yeonjoo Kim, Jürgen Knauer, David Lawrence, Xiangzhong Luo, Sergey Malyshev, Tomoko Nitta, Jerome Ogee, Keith Oleson, Catherine Ottlé, Phillipe Peylin, Patricia de Rosnay, Heather Rumbold, Bob Su, Nicolas Vuichard, Anthony P. Walker, Xiaoni Wang-Faivre, Yunfei Wang, and Yijian Zeng
Biogeosciences, 21, 5517–5538, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5517-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5517-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper evaluates land models – computer-based models that simulate ecosystem dynamics; land carbon, water, and energy cycles; and the role of land in the climate system. It uses machine learning and AI approaches to show that, despite the complexity of land models, they do not perform nearly as well as they could given the amount of information they are provided with about the prediction problem.
Hocheol Seo and Yeonjoo Kim
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4699–4713, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4699-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4699-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Wildfire is a crucial factor in carbon and water fluxes on the Earth system. About 2.1 Pg of carbon is released into the atmosphere by wildfires annually. Because the fire processes are still limitedly represented in land surface models, we forced the daily GFED4 burned area into the land surface model over Alaska and Siberia. The results with the GFED4 burned area significantly improved the simulated carbon emissions and net ecosystem exchange compared to the default simulation.
Ensheng Weng, Igor Aleinov, Ram Singh, Michael J. Puma, Sonali S. McDermid, Nancy Y. Kiang, Maxwell Kelley, Kevin Wilcox, Ray Dybzinski, Caroline E. Farrior, Stephen W. Pacala, and Benjamin I. Cook
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8153–8180, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8153-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8153-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We develop a demographic vegetation model to improve the representation of terrestrial vegetation dynamics and ecosystem biogeochemical cycles in the Goddard Institute for Space Studies ModelE. The individual-based competition for light and soil resources makes the modeling of eco-evolutionary optimality possible. This model will enable ModelE to simulate long-term biogeophysical and biogeochemical feedbacks between the climate system and land ecosystems at decadal to centurial temporal scales.
Elizabeth Klovenski, Yuxuan Wang, Susanne E. Bauer, Kostas Tsigaridis, Greg Faluvegi, Igor Aleinov, Nancy Y. Kiang, Alex Guenther, Xiaoyan Jiang, Wei Li, and Nan Lin
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13303–13323, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13303-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13303-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Severe drought stresses vegetation and causes reduced emission of isoprene. We study the impact of including a new isoprene drought stress (yd) parameterization in NASA GISS ModelE called DroughtStress_ModelE, which is specifically tuned for ModelE. Inclusion of yd leads to better simulated isoprene emissions at the MOFLUX site during the severe drought of 2012, reduced overestimation of OMI satellite ΩHCHO (formaldehyde column), and improved simulated O3 (ozone) during drought.
Suyeon Choi and Yeonjoo Kim
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5967–5985, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5967-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5967-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Here we present the cGAN-based precipitation nowcasting model, named Rad-cGAN, trained to predict a radar reflectivity map with a lead time of 10 min. Rad-cGAN showed superior performance at a lead time of up to 90 min compared with the reference models. Furthermore, we demonstrate the successful implementation of the transfer learning strategies using pre-trained Rad-cGAN to develop the models for different dam domains.
Cited articles
Abramopoulos, F., Rosenzweig, C., and Choudhury, B. J.: Improved ground hydrology calculations for global climate models (GCMs): soil water movement and evapotranspiration, J. Climate, 1, 921–941, 1988.
Amthor, J. S.: The McCree–de Wit–Penning de Vries–Thornley respiration paradigms: 30 years later, Ann. Bot.-London, 86, 1–20, 2000.
Aranibar, J. N., Berry, J. A., Riley, W. J., Pataki, D. E., Law, B. E., and Ehleringer, J. R.: Combining meteorology, eddy fluxes, isotope measurements, and modeling to understand environmental controls of carbon isotope discrimination at the canopy scale, Glob. Change Biol., 12, 710–730, 2006.
Archetti, M., Richardson, A. D., O'Keefe, J., and Delpierre, N.: Predicting Climate Change Impacts on the Amount and Duration of Autumn Colors in a New England Forest, PLoS ONE, 8, e57373, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057373, 2013.
Arora, V. K. and Boer, G. J.: A parameterization of leaf phenology for the terrestrial ecosystem component of climate models, Glob. Change Biol., 11, 39–59, 2005.
Baldocchi, D., Falge, E., Gu, L., Olson, R., Hollinger, D., Running, S., Anthoni, P., Bernhofer, C., Davis, K., Evans, R., Fuentes, J., Goldstein, A., Katul, G., Law, B., Lee, X., Malhi, Y., Meyers, T., Munger, W., Oechel, W., Paw U, K. T., Schmid, H. P., Valentini, R., Verma, S., Vesala, T., Wilson, K., and Wofsy, S.: FLUXNET: a new tool to study the temporal and spatial variability of ecosystem-scale carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy flux densities, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 82, 2415–2434, 2001.
Baldocchi, D., Xu, L. K., and Kiang, N.: How plant functional-type, weather, seasonal drought, and soil physical properties alter water and energy fluxes of an oak-grass savanna and an annual grassland, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 123, 13–39, 2004.
Ball, J., Woodrow, L. E., and Beny, J. A.: A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions, in: Progress in Photosynthesis research, edited by: Biggins, J., Nijhoff, Dordrecht, 221–224, 1987.
Batjes, N. H.: Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 47, 151–163, 1996a.
Batjes, N. H.: Documentation to ISRIC-WISE global data set of derived soil properties on a 1/2 deg by 1/2 deg grid (Version 1.0), Wageningen, the Netherlands, International Soil Reference and Information Centre (ISRIC), 1996b.
Bauerle, W. L., Oren, R., Way, D. A., Qian, S. S., Stoy, P. C., Thornton, P. E., Bowden, J. D., Hoffman, F. M., and Reynolds, R. F.: Photoperiodic regulation of the seasonal pattern of photosynthetic capacity and the implications for carbon cycling, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 109, 8612–8617, 2012.
Bonan, G. B.: A land surface model (LSM Version 1.0) for ecological, hydrological, and atmospheric studies: technical description and user's guide, Boulder, Colorado, National Center of Atmospheric Research, 122, 1996.
Bonan, G. B. and Levis, S.: Evaluating aspects of the community land and atmosphere models (CLM3 and CAM3) using a Dynamic Global Vegetation Model, J. Climate, 19, 2290–2301, 2006.
Bonan, G. B., Levis, S., Sitch, S., Vertenstein, M., and Oleson, K. W.: A dynamic global vegetation model for use with climate models: concepts and description of simulated vegetation dynamics, Glob. Change Biol., 9, 1543–1566, 2003.
Bonan, G. B., Lawrence, P. J., Oleson, K. W., Levis, S., Jung, M., Reichstein, M., Lawrence, D. M., and Swenson, S. C.: Improving canopy processes in the Community Land Model version 4 (CLM4) using global flux fields empirically inferred from FLUXNET data, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 116, G02014, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JG001593, 2011.
Botta, A., Viovy, N., Ciais, P., Friedlingstein, P., and Monfray, P.: A global prognostic scheme of leaf onset using satellite data, Glob. Change Biol., 6, 709–725, 2000.
Caldararu, S., Purves, D. W., and Palmer, P. I.: Phenology as a strategy for carbon optimality: a global model, Biogeosciences, 11, 763–778, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-763-2014, 2014.
Calvo-Alvarado, J. C., McDowell, N. G., and Waring, R. H.: Allometric relationships predicting foliar biomass and leaf area: sapwood area ratio from tree height in five Costa Rican rain forest species, Tree Physiol., 28, 1601–1608, 2008.
Cannell, M. G. R. and Thornley, J. H. M.: Modelling the components of plant respiration: some guiding principles, Ann. Bot.-London, 85, 45–54, 2000.
Cox, P. M.: Description of the "TRIFFID" Dynamic Global Vegetation Model, London, Hadley Centre, 16, 2001.
Cramer, W., Bondeau, A., Woodward, F. I., Prentice, I. C., Betts, R. A., Brovkin, V., Cox, P. M., Fisher, V., Foley, J. A., Friend, A. D., Kucharik, C., Lomas, M. R., Ramankutty, N., Sitch, S., Smith, B., White, A., and Young-Molling, C.: Global response of terrestrial ecosystem structure and function to CO2 and climate change: results from six dynamic global vegetation models, Glob. Change Biol., 7, 357–373, 2001.
Defries, R. S., Field, C. B., Fung, I., Justice, C. O., Los, S. O., Matson, P. A., Matthews, E., Mooney, H. A., Potter, C., Prentice, K. C., Sellers, P. J., Townshend, J., Tucker, C. J., Ustin, S. L., and Vitousek, P.: Mapping the land-surface for global atmosphere–biosphere models – toward continuous distributions of vegetations functional-properites, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 100, 20867–20882, 1995.
Del Grosso, S. J., Parton, W. J., Mosier, A. R., Holland, E. A., Pendall, E., Schimel, D. S., and Ojima, D. S.: Modeling soil CO2 emissions from ecosystems, Biogeochemistry, 73, 71–91, 2005.
Delire, C. and Foley, J. A.: Evaluating the performance of a land Surface/ecosystem model with biophysical measurements from contrasting environments, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 16895–16909, 1999.
Delpierre, N., Dufrene, E., Soudani, K., Ulrich, E., Cecchini, S., Boe, J. and Francois, C.: Modelling interannual and spatial variability of leaf senescence for three deciduous tree species in France, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 149, 938–948, 2009.
Dirmeyer, P. A.: Vegetation stress as a feedback mechanism in midlatitude drought, J. Climate, 7, 1463–1483, 1994.
Doney, S. C., Lindsay, K., Fung, I., and John, J.: Natural variability in a stable, 1000-Yr global coupled climate-carbon cycle simulation, J. Climate, 19, 3033–3054, 2006.
Dragoni, D., Schmid, H. P., Grimmond, C. S. B., and Loescher, H. W.: Uncertainty of annual net ecosystem productivity estimated using eddy covariance flux measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D17102, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008149, 2007.
Dunne, J. P., John, J. G., Shevliakova, E., Stouffer, R. J., Krasting, J. P., Malyshev, S. L., Milly, P. C. D., Sentman, L. T., Adcroft, A. J., Cooke, W., Dunne, K. A., Griffies, S. M., Hallberg, R. W., Harrison, M. J., Levy, H., Wittenberg, A. T., Phillips, P. J., and Zadeh, N.: GFDL's ESM2 Global Coupled Climate-Carbon Earth System Models. Part II: Carbon System Formulation and Baseline Simulation Characteristics, J. Climate, 26, 2247–2267, 2013.
Epron, D., Bahn, M., Derrien, D., Lattanzi, F. A., Pumpanen, J., Gessler, A., Hogberg, P., Maillard, P., Dannoura, M., Gerant, D., and Buchmann, N.: Pulse-labelling trees to study carbon allocation dynamics: a review of methods, current knowledge and future prospects, Tree Physiol., 32, 776–798, 2012a.
Epron, D., Laclau, J.-P., Almeida, J. C. R., Gon Balves, J. L. M., Ponton, S., Sette Jr., C. R., Delgado-Rojas, J. S., Bouillet, J.-P., and Nouvellon, A. Y.: Do changes in carbon allocation account for the growth response to potassium and sodium applications in tropical Eucalyptus plantations?, Tree Physiol., 32, 667–679, 2012b.
Falge, E., Baldocchi, D., Tenhunen, J., Aubinet, M., Bakwin, P., Berbigier, P., Bernhofer, C., Burba, G., Clement, R., Davis, K. J., Elbers, J. A., Goldstein, A. H., Grelle, A., Granier, A., Gu\dhmundsson, J., Hollinger, D., Kowalski, A. S., Katul, G., Law, B. E., Malhi, Y., Meyers, T., Monson, R. K., Munger, J. W., Oechel, W., Paw U, K. T., Pilegaard, K., Rannik, Ü., Rebmann, C., Suyker, A., Valentini, R., Wilson, K., and Wofsy, S.: Seasonality of ecosystem respiration and gross primary production as derived from FLUXNET measurements, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 113, 75–95, 2002.
Farquhar, G. and Von Caemmerer, S.: Modeling photosynthetic response to environmental conditions, in: Encyclopedia of Plant Physiol., edited by: Lange, O. L., Nobel, P. S., Osmond, C. B., and Ziegler, H., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 549–587, 1982.
Farquhar, G. D., Caemmerer, S. V., and Berry, J. A.: A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species, Planta, 149, 78–90, 1980.
Foley, J. A., Prentice, I. C., Ramankutty, N., Levis, S., Pollard, D., Sitch, S., and Haxeltine, A.: An integrated biosphere model of land surface processes, terrestrial carbon balance, and vegetation dynamics, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 10, 603–628, 1996.
Forkel, M., Carvalhais, N., Schaphoff, S., v. Bloh, W., Migliavacca, M., Thurner, M., and Thonicke, K.: Identifying environmental controls on vegetation greenness phenology through model–data integration, Biogeosciences, 11, 7025–7050, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-7025-2014, 2014.
Franklin, O., Johansson, J., Dewar, R. C., Dieckmann, U., McMurtrie, R. E., Brannstrom, A., and Dybzinski, R.: Modeling carbon allocation in trees: a search for principles, Tree Physiol., 32, 648–666, 2012.
Friedlingstein, P., Joel, G., Field, C. B., and Fung, I. Y.: Toward an allocation scheme for global terrestrial carbon models, Glob. Change Biol., 5, 755–770, 1999.
Friedlingstein, P., Cox, P., Betts, R., Bopp, L., Von Bloh, W., Brovkin, V., Cadule, P., Doney, S., Eby, M., Fung, I., Bala, G., John, J., Jones, C., Joos, F., Kato, T., Kawamiya, M., Knorr, W., Lindsay, K., Matthews, H. D., Raddatz, T., Rayner, P., Reick, C., Roeckner, E., Schnitzler, K.-G., Schnur, R., Strassmann, K., Weaver, A. J., Yoshikawa, C., and Zeng, N.: Climate-carbon cycle feedback analysis: results from the C(4)MIP model intercomparison, J. Climate, 19, 3337–3353, 2006.
Friedlingstein, P., Meinshausen, M., Arora, V. K., Jones, C. D., Anav, A., Liddicoat, S. K., and Knutti, R.: Uncertainties in CMIP5 climate projections due to carbon cycle feedbacks, J. Climate, 27, 511–526, 2014.
Friend, A. D. and Kiang, N. Y.: Land surface model development for the GISS GCM: Effects of improved canopy physiology on simulated climate, J. Climate, 18, 2883–2902, 2005.
Friend, A. D., Arneth, A., Kiang, N. Y., Lomas, M., Ogée, J., Rödenbeck, C., Running, S. W., Santaren, J.-D., Sitch, S., Viovy, N., Woodward, F. I., and Zaele, S.: FLUXNET and modelling the global carbon cycle, Glob. Change Biol., 13, 610–633, 2007.
Fung, I., Doney, S., Lindsay, K., and John, J.: Evolution of carbon sinks in a changing climate, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 102, 11201–11206, 2005.
Goulden, M. L., Munger, J. W., Fan, S. M., Daube, B. C., and Wofsy, S. C.: Exchange of carbon dioxide by a deciduous forest: response to interannual climate variability, Science, 271, 1576–1578, 1996.
Hanninen, H. and Kramer, K.: A framework for modelling the annual cycle of trees in boreal and temperate regions, Silva Fenn., 41, 167–205, 2007.
Hutyra, L. R., Munger, J. W., Saleska, S. R., Gottlieb, E., Daube, B. C., Dunn, A. L., Amaral, D. F., de Camargo, P. B., and Wofsy, S. C.: Seasonal controls on the exchange of carbon and water in an Amazonian rain forest, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 112, G03008, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JG000365, 2007.
Jackson, R. B., Canadell, J., Ehleringer, J. R., Mooney, H. A., Sala, A., and Schulze, E. D.: A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes, Oecologia, 108, 389–411, 1996.
Jolly, W. M. and Running, S. W.: Effects of precipitation and soil water potential on drought deciduous phenology in the Kalahari, Glob. Change Biol., 10, 303–308, 2004.
Jolly, W. M., Nemani, R., and Running, S. W.: A generalized, bioclimatic index to predict foliar phenology in response to climate, Glob. Change Biol., 11, 619–632, 2005.
Kiang, N. Y.: Savannas and seasonal drought: the landscape-leaf connection through optimal stomatal control, in: Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, 303 pp., 2002.
Kim, Y. and Wang, G.: Modeling seasonal vegetation variation and its validation against Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) observations over North America, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D04106, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005436, 2005.
Kim, Y. and Wang, G. L.: Impact of vegetation feedback on the response of precipitation to antecedent soil moisture anomalies over North America, J. Hydrometeorol., 8, 534–550, 2007.
Kleidon, A. and Mooney, H. A.: A global distribution of biodiversity inferred from climatic constraints: results from a process-based modelling study, Glob. Change Biol., 6, 507–523, 2000.
Körner, C. and Basler, D.: Phenology under global warming, Science, 327, 1461–1462, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1186473, 2010.
Koster, R. D., Guo, Z., Dirmeyer, P. A., Yang, R., Mitchell, K., and Puma, M. J.: On the nature of soil moisture in land surface models, J. Climate, 22, 4322–4335, 2009.
Kramer, K., Leinonen, I., and Loustau, D.: The importance of phenology for the evaluation of impact of climate change on growth of boreal, temperate and Mediterranean forests ecosystems: an overview, Int. J. Biometeorol., 44, 67–75, 2000.
Krinner, G., Viovy, N., de Noblet-Ducoudré, N., Ogée, J., Polcher, J., Friedlingstein, P., Ciais, P., Sitch, S., and Prentice, I. C.: A dynamic global vegetation model for studies of the coupled atmosphere–biosphere system, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 19, GB1015, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GB002199, 2005.
Kucharik, C., Barford, C., El Maayar, M., Wofsy, S. C., Monson, R. K., and Baldocchi, D. D.: A multiyear evaluation of a Dynamic Global Vegetation Model at three AmeriFlux forest sites: vegetation structure, phenology, soil temperature, and CO2 and H2O vapor exchange, Ecol. Model., 196, 1–31, 2006.
Levis, S. and Bonan, G. B.: Simulating springtime temperature patterns in the community atmosphere model coupled to the community land model using prognostic leaf area, J. Climate, 17, 4531–4540, 2004.
Lockhart, J. A.: An analysis of irreversible plant cell elongation, J. Theor. Biol., 8, 264–275, 1965.
Mäkelä, A., Hari, P., Berninger, F., Hanninen, H., and Nikinmaa, E.: Acclimation of photosynthetic capacity in Scots pine to the annual cycle of temperature, Tree Physiol., 24, 369–376, 2004.
Mäkelä, A., Kolari, P., Karimäki, J., Nikinmaa, E., Perämäki, M., and Hari, P.: Modelling five years of weather-driven variation of GPP in a boreal forest, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 139, 382–398, 2006.
Medvigy, D., Walko, R. L., and Avissar, R.,: Modeling interannual variability of the Amazon hydroclimate, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L15817, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034941, 2008.
Medvigy, D., Wofsy, S. C., Munger, J. W., Hollinger, D. Y., and Moorcroft, P. R.: Mechanistic scaling of ecosystem function and dynamics in space and time: ecosystem demography model version 2, J. Geophys. Res., 114, G01002, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JG000812, 2009.
Migliavacca, M., Galvagno, M., Cremonese, E., Rossini, M., Meroni, M., Sonnentag, O., Cogliati, S., Manca, G., Diotri, F., Busetto, L., Cescatti, A., Colombo, R., Fava, F., Morra di Cella, U., Pari, E., Siniscalco, C., and Richardson, A. D.: Using digital repeat photography and eddy covariance data to model grassland phenology and photosynthetic CO2 uptake, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 151, 1325–1337, 2011.
Migliavacca, M., Sonnentag, O., Keenan, T. F., Cescatti, A., O'Keefe, J., and Richardson, A. D.: On the uncertainty of phenological responses to climate change, and implications for a terrestrial biosphere model, Biogeosciences, 9, 2063–2083, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-2063-2012, 2012.
Mo, X., Chen, J. M., Ju, W., and Black, T. A.: Optimization of ecosystem model parameters through assimilating eddy covariance flux data with an ensemble Kalman filter, Ecol. Model., 217, 157–173, 2008.
Moorcroft, P. R., Hurtt, G. C., and Pacala, S. W.: A method for scaling vegetation dynamics: the ecosystem demography model (ED), Ecol. Monogr., 71, 557–585, 2001.
Ni-Meister, W., Yang, W. Z., and Kiang, N. Y.: A clumped-foliage canopy radiative transfer model for a global dynamic terrestrial ecosystem model, I: Theory, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 150, 881–894, 2010.
O'Keefe, J.: Phenology of Woody Species at Harvard Forest since 1990, Harvard Forest Data Archive, HF003, 2000.
Oleson, K. W., Dai, Y., Bonan, G., Bosilovich, M., Dickinson, R., Dirmeyer, P., Hoffman, F., Houser, P., Levis, S., Niu, G-Y., Thornton, P., Vertenstein, M., Yang, Z.-L., and Zeng, X.: Technical description of the Community Land Model (CLM), NCAR Technical Note NCAR/TN-461+STR, 173, 2004.
Payne, C.: Modification of the nitrogen content and C : N ratio of Sitka spruce timber by kiln and air drying, de Gruyter, Berlin, Allemagne, 2002.
Potter, C. S., Randerson, J. T., Field, C. B., Matson, P. A., Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., and Klooster, S. A.: Terrestrial ecosystem production: a process model based on global satellite and surface data, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 7, 811–841, 1993.
Pumpanen, J., Heinonsalo, J., Rasilo, T., Villemot, J., and Ilvesniemi, H.: The effects of soil and air temperature on CO2 exchange and net biomass accumulation in Norway spruce, Scots pine and silver birch seedlings, Tree Physiol., 32, 724–736, 2012.
Randerson, J. T., Thompson, M. V., Conway, T. J., Fung, I. Y., and Field, C. B.: The contribution of terrestrial sources and sinks to trends in the seasonal cycle of atmospheric carbon dioxide, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 11, 535–560, 1997.
Randerson, J. T., Hoffman, F. M., Thornton, P. E., Mahowald, N. M., Lindsay, K., Lee, Y. H., Nevison, C. D., Doney, S. C., Bonan, G., Stockli, R., Covey, C., Running, S. W., and Fung, I. Y.: Systematic assessment of terrestrial biogeochemistry in coupled climate-carbon models, Glob. Change Biol., 15, 2462–2484, 2009.
Reich, P. B., Wright, I. J., and Lusk, C. H.: Predicting leaf physiology from simple plant and climate attributes: a global GLOPNET analysis, Ecol. Appl., 17, 1982–1988, 2007.
Rending, V. V. and Taylor, H. M.: Principles of soil-plant interrelationships, New York, USA, McGraw Hill, 1989.
Repo, T., Makela, A., and Hanninen, H.: Modelling frost resistance of trees, in: Modelling to Understand Forest Function, edited by: Jozefek, H., Silva Carelica, 61–74, 1990.
Richardson, A. D., Anderson, R. S., Arain, A. M., Barr, A. L. A. N. G., Bohrer, G., Chen, G., Chen, J. M., Ciais, P., Davis, K. J., Desai, A. R., Dietze, M. C., Dragoni, D., Garrity, S. R., Gough, C. M., Grant, R., Hollinger, D. Y., Margolis, H. A. N. K. A., McCaughey, H., Migli avacca, M., Monson, R. K., Munger, W. J., Poulter, B., Raczka, B. M., Ricciuto, D. M., Sahoo, A. K., Schaefer, K. E. V. I. N., Tian, H., Vargas, R., Verbeeck, H., Xiao, J., and Xue, Y.: Terrestrial biosphere models need better representation of vegetation phenology: results from the North American Carbon Program Site Synthesis, Glob. Change Biol., 18, 566–584, 2012.
Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., Porporato, A., Laio, F., and Ridolfi, L.: Plants in water-controlled ecosystems: active role in hydrologic processes and responses to water stress, I. Scope and general outline, Adv. Water Resour., 24, 695–705, 2001.
Rosenzweig, C. and Abramopoulos, F.: Land-surface model development for the GISS GCM, J. Climate, 10, 2040–2054, 1997.
Sala, A., Woodruff, D. R., and Meinzer, F. C.: Carbon dynamics in trees: feast or famine?, Tree Physiol., 32, 764–775, 2012.
Schmid, H. P., Grimmond, C. S. B., Cropley, F., Offerle, B., and Su, H. B.: Measurements of CO2 and energy fluxes over a mixed hardwood forest in the mid-western United States, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 103, 357–374, 2000.
Schmidt, G. A., Ruedy, R., Hansen, J. E., Aleinov, I., Bell, N., Bauer, M., Bauer, S., Cairns, B., Canuto, V., Cheng, Y., Del Genio, A., Faluvegi, G., Friend, A. D., Hall, T. M., Hu, Y., Kelley, M., Kiang, N. Y., Koch, D., Lacis, A. A., Lerner, J., Lo, K. K., Miller, R. L., Nazarenko, L., Oinas, V., Perlwitz, J. P., Perlwitz, J., Rind, D., Romanou, A., Russell, G. L., Sato, M., Shindell, D. T., Stone, P. H., Sun, S., Tausnev, N., Thresher, D., and Yao, M.-S.: Present day atmospheric simulations using GISS ModelE: comparison to in-situ, satellite and reanalysis data, J. Climate, 19, 153–192, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3612.1, 2006.
Schmidt, G. A., Kelley, M., Nazarenko, L., Ruedy, R., Russell, G. L., Aleinov, I., Bauer, M., Bauer, S. E., Bhat, M. K., Bleck, R., Canuto, V., Chen, Y.-H., Cheng, Y., Clune, T. L., Del Genio, A., de Fainchtein, R., Faluvegi, G., Hansen, J. E., Healy, R. J., Kiang, N. Y., Koch, D., Lacis, A. A., LeGrande, A. N., Lerner, J., Lo, K. K., Matthews, E. E., Menon, S., Miller, R. L., Oinas, V., Oloso, A. O., Perlwitz, J. P., Puma, M. J., Putman, W. M., Rind, D., Romanou, A., Sato, M., Shindell, D. T., Sun, S., Syed, R. A., Tausnev, N., Tsigaridis, K., Unger, N., Voulgarakis, A., Yao, M.-S., and Zhang, J.: Configuration and assessment of the GISS ModelE2 contributions to the CMIP5 archive, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 6, 141–184, 2014.
Schneider, R., Berninger, F., Ung, C. H., Makela, A., Swift, D. E., and Zhang, S. Y.: Within crown variation in the relationship between foliage biomass and sapwood area in jack pine, Tree Physiol., 31, 22–29, 2011.
Shinozaki, K., Yoda, K., Hozumi, K., and Kira, T.: A quantitative analysis of plant form-the pipe model theory, I. Basic analyses, Jpn. Ecol., 14, 97–105, 1964.
Sitch, S., Smith, B., Prentice, I. C., Arneth, A., Bondeau, A., Cramer, W., Kaplan, J., Levis, S., Lucht, W., Sykes, M., Thonicke, K., and Venevsky, S: Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model, Glob. Change Biol., 9, 161–185, 2003.
Stöckli, R., Lawrence, D. M., Niu, G.-Y., Oleson, K. W., Thornton, P. E., Yang, Z.-L., Bonan, G. B., Denning, A. S., and Running, S. W.: Use of FLUXNET in the community land model development, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 113, G01025, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JG000562, 2008.
Stöckli, R., Rutishauser, T., Baker, I., Liniger, M. A., and Denning, A. S.: A global reanalysis of vegetation phenology, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 116, G03020, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JG001545, 2011.
Tang, J. W. and Baldocchi, D. D.: Spatial–temporal variation in soil respiration in an oak-grass savanna ecosystem in California and its partitioning into autotrophic and heterotrophic components, Biogeochemistry, 73, 183–207, 2005.
Tang, J. W., Baldocchi, D. D., and Xu, L.: Tree photosynthesis modulates soil respiration on a diurnal time scale, Glob. Change Biol., 11, 1298–1304, 2005.
Urbanski, S., Barford, C., Wofsy, S., Kucharik, C., Pyle, E., Budney, J., McKain, K., Fitz jarrald, D., Czikowsky, M., and Munger, J. W.: Factors controlling CO2 exchange on timescales from hourly to decadal at Harvard Forest, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 112, G02020, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JG000293, 2007.
van der Tol, C., Berry, J. A., Campbell, P. K. E., and Rascher, U.: Models of fluorescence and photosynthesis for interpreting measurements of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 119, 2312–2327, 2014.
Wang, Y. P., Baldocchi, D., Leuning, R., Falge, E., and Vesala, T.: Estimating parameters in a land-surface model by applying nonlinear inversion to eddy covariance flux measurements from eight FLUXNET sites, Glob. Change Biol., 13, 652–670, 2007.
Welp, L. R., Keeling, R. F., Meijer, H. A. J., Bollenbacher, A. F., Piper, S. C., Yoshimura, K., Francey, R. J., Allison, C. E., and Wahlen, M.: Interannual variability in the oxygen isotopes of atmospheric CO2 driven by El Niño, Nature, 477, 579–582, 2011.
White, M. A., Thornton, P. E., and Runnning, S. W.: A continental phenology model for monitoring vegetation responses to interannual climatic variability, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 11, 217–234, 1997.
Wilson, K., Goldstein, A., Falge, E., Aubinet, M., Baldocchi, M., Berbigier, P., Bernhofer, C., Ceulemans, R., Dolman, H., Field, C., Grelle, A., Ibrom, A., Law, B. E., Kowalski, A., Meyers, T., Moncrieff, J., Monson, R., Oechel, W., Tenhunen, J., Verma, S., and Valentini, R.: Energy balance closure at FLUXNET sites, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 113, 223–243, 2002.
Xu, L. and Baldocchi, D. D.: Seasonal variation in carbon dioxide exchange over a Mediterranean annual grassland in California, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 123, 79–96, 2004.
Xue, Y. K., Fennessy, M. J., and Sellers, P. J.: Impact of vegetation properties on US summer weather prediction, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 7419–7430, 1996.
Yang, W., Ni-Meister, W., Kiang, N. Y., Moorcroft, P. R., Strahler, A. H., and Oliphant, A.: A clumped-foliage canopy radiative transfer model for a Global Dynamic Terrestrial Ecosystem Model II: comparison to measurements, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 150, 895–907, 2010.
Yang, X., Mustard, J. F., Tang, J., and Xu, H.: Regional-scale phenology modeling based on meteorological records and remote sensing observations, J. Geophys. Res., 117, G03029, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JG001977, 2012.
Short summary
The Ent Terrestrial Biosphere Model is a mixed-canopy dynamic global vegetation model developed specifically for coupling with land surface hydrology and general circulation models. This study describes the leaf phenology submodel implemented in the Ent TBM. We evaluate the performance in reproducing observed leaf seasonal growth as well as water and carbon fluxes for four plant functional types at five Fluxnet sites.
The Ent Terrestrial Biosphere Model is a mixed-canopy dynamic global vegetation model developed...
