Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.240 IF 5.240
  • IF 5-year value: 5.768 IF 5-year
    5.768
  • CiteScore value: 8.9 CiteScore
    8.9
  • SNIP value: 1.713 SNIP 1.713
  • IPP value: 5.53 IPP 5.53
  • SJR value: 3.18 SJR 3.18
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 71 Scimago H
    index 71
  • h5-index value: 51 h5-index 51
Volume 7, issue 6
Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 2613–2638, 2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2613-2014
© Author(s) 2014. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Special issue: Nucleus for European Modelling of the Ocean - NEMO

Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 2613–2638, 2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2613-2014
© Author(s) 2014. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Model description paper 10 Nov 2014

Model description paper | 10 Nov 2014

Recent development of the Met Office operational ocean forecasting system: an overview and assessment of the new Global FOAM forecasts

E. W. Blockley et al.

Related authors

An inter-comparison of the mass budget of the Arctic sea ice in CMIP6 models
Ann Keen, Ed Blockley, David Bailey, Jens Boldingh Debernard, Mitchell Bushuk, Steve Delhaye, David Docquier, Daniel Feltham, François Massonnet, Siobhan O'Farrell, Leandro Ponsoni, José M. Rodriguez, David Schroeder, Neil Swart, Takahiro Toyoda, Hiroyuki Tsujino, Martin Vancoppenolle, and Klaus Wyser
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2019-314,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2019-314, 2020
Preprint under review for TC
Short summary
Description of the resolution hierarchy of the global coupled HadGEM3-GC3.1 model as used in CMIP6 HighResMIP experiments
Malcolm J. Roberts, Alex Baker, Ed W. Blockley, Daley Calvert, Andrew Coward, Helene T. Hewitt, Laura C. Jackson, Till Kuhlbrodt, Pierre Mathiot, Christopher D. Roberts, Reinhard Schiemann, Jon Seddon, Benoît Vannière, and Pier Luigi Vidale
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4999–5028, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4999-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4999-2019, 2019
Short summary
Using Arctic ice mass balance buoys for evaluation of modelled ice energy fluxes
Alex West, Mat Collins, and Ed Blockley
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-113,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-113, 2019
Preprint under review for GMD
Short summary
Induced surface fluxes: a new framework for attributing Arctic sea ice volume balance biases to specific model errors
Alex West, Mat Collins, Ed Blockley, Jeff Ridley, and Alejandro Bodas-Salcedo
The Cryosphere, 13, 2001–2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2001-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2001-2019, 2019
Short summary
Improving Met Office seasonal predictions of Arctic sea ice using assimilation of CryoSat-2 thickness
Edward W. Blockley and K. Andrew Peterson
The Cryosphere, 12, 3419–3438, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3419-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3419-2018, 2018
Short summary

Related subject area

Oceanography
Representation of the Denmark Strait overflow in a z-coordinate eddying configuration of the NEMO (v3.6) ocean model: resolution and parameter impacts
Pedro Colombo, Bernard Barnier, Thierry Penduff, Jérôme Chanut, Julie Deshayes, Jean-Marc Molines, Julien Le Sommer, Polina Verezemskaya, Sergey Gulev, and Anne-Marie Treguier
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3347–3371, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3347-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3347-2020, 2020
Short summary
A global eddying hindcast ocean simulation with OFES2
Hideharu Sasaki, Shinichiro Kida, Ryo Furue, Hidenori Aiki, Nobumasa Komori, Yukio Masumoto, Toru Miyama, Masami Nonaka, Yoshikazu Sasai, and Bunmei Taguchi
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3319–3336, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3319-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3319-2020, 2020
Short summary
Tracking water masses using passive-tracer transport in NEMO v3.4 with NEMOTAM: application to North Atlantic Deep Water and North Atlantic Subtropical Mode Water
Dafydd Stephenson, Simon A. Müller, and Florian Sévellec
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2031–2050, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2031-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2031-2020, 2020
Short summary
Sensitivity study on the main tidal constituents of the Gulf of Tonkin by using the frequency-domain tidal solver in T-UGOm
Violaine Piton, Marine Herrmann, Florent Lyard, Patrick Marsaleix, Thomas Duhaut, Damien Allain, and Sylvain Ouillon
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1583–1607, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1583-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1583-2020, 2020
Short summary
DINCAE 1.0: a convolutional neural network with error estimates to reconstruct sea surface temperature satellite observations
Alexander Barth, Aida Alvera-Azcárate, Matjaz Licer, and Jean-Marie Beckers
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1609–1622, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1609-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1609-2020, 2020
Short summary

Cited articles

Adcroft, A., Hill, C., and Marshall, J.: Representation of topography by shaved cells in a height coordinate ocean model, Mon. Weathee Rev., 125, 2293–2315, 1997.
Arakawa, A. and Lamb, V. R.: A potential enstrophy and energy conserving scheme for the shallow water equations, Mon. Weather Rev., 109, 18–36, 1980.
Arribas, A., Glover, M., Maidens, A., Peterson, K. A., Gordon, M., MacLachlan, C., Graham, R., Fereday, D., Camp, J., Scaife, A. A., Xavier, P., McLean, P., Colman, A., and Cusack, S.: The GloSea4 ensemble prediction system for seasonal forecasting, Mon. Weather Rev., 139, 1891–1910, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010MWR3615.1, 2011.
Axell, L. B.: Wind-driven internal waves and Langmuir circulations in a numerical ocean model of the southern Baltic Sea, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 3204, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JC000922, 2002.
Balmaseda, M. A., Mogensen, K., and Weaver, A. T.: Evaluation of the ECMWF ocean reanalysis system ORAS4, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 139, 1132–1161, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2063, 2012.
Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation