Articles | Volume 17, issue 16
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6249-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6249-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Model experiment description paper
| 
23 Aug 2024
Model experiment description paper |
| 23 Aug 2024
| 23 Aug 2024
Dynamical Madden–Julian Oscillation forecasts using an ensemble subseasonal-to-seasonal forecast system of the IAP-CAS model
Yangke Liu
State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics (LASG), Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Qing Bao
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics (LASG), Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
Bian He
State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics (LASG), Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
Xiaofei Wu
School of Atmospheric Sciences/Plateau Atmosphere and Environment Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu 610225, China
Jing Yang
Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
Yimin Liu
State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics (LASG), Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
Guoxiong Wu
State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics (LASG), Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics (LASG), Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
Siyuan Zhou
State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics (LASG), Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
Yao Tang
State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics (LASG), Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Ankang Qu
State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics (LASG), Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
School of Emergency Management Science and Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Yalan Fan
Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
Anling Liu
Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
Dandan Chen
State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics (LASG), Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Zhaoming Luo
State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics (LASG), Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
School of Emergency Management Science and Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Xing Hu
National Meteorological Information Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, China
Tongwen Wu
Center for Earth System Modeling and Prediction, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, China
Related authors
No articles found.
Yanjie Liu, Xiaocong Wang, Yimin Liu, Shuaiqi Tang, and Hao Miao
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 6763–6779, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-6763-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-6763-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates how well operational models simulate the diurnal cycle of summer rainfall over China. Comparing three reanalyses shows all capture nocturnal precipitation peak but differ in afternoon rainfall timing: JRA‑55 and MERRA‑2 match observations better, while ERA5 exhibits a 3-hour phase advance. These differences are linked to how large-scale forcing is use in convection parameterization, underscoring the critical role of trigger on cumulus convection.
Xiaofei Wu, Siyang Chen, Jinxi Li, Yu Zhang, Zifa Wang, Pu Gan, Jie Zheng, and Fangxin Fang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1685, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1685, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
Cities face a major challenge in tracking how wind and air pollution move through complex building clusters. Common numerical models often struggle to balance accuracy with calculating speed. We developed a new simulation system that automatically adjusts its focus to where the air is moving rapidly. By testing this against observations, it significantly improves predictions of wind and pollution. This tool helps urban planners design healthier cities by better identifying how pollutants travel.
David D. Parrish, Charles A. Mims, Richard G. Derwent, Ian C. Faloona, Henry Bowman, Tongwen Wu, Jie Zhang, Makoto Deushi, and Naga Oshima
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1939, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1939, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Nearly a century of ozone concentration measurements (the last half continuous) is now available in the northern mid-latitude troposphere. Atmospheric models cannot yet accurately simulate that record. We compare measured and simulated long-term changes and seasonal cycles of background ozone to quantify some model shortcomings, and suggest that their important causes may be inadequate model treatments of ozone precursor evolution and vertical transport out of the planetary boundary layer.
Yiran Chen, Jiming Jin, Yimin Liu, Jannik Heusinger, Jesús Carrera, and Zeyu Zhou
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1311, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1311, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Solar power plants are expanding rapidly worldwide, but their impacts on local climate remain uncertain. In this study, we developed a coupled model that explicitly represents interactions between solar panels, land surface, and the atmosphere. Simulations show that large solar farms can cool the land surface while warming the air near the ground, reduce incoming shortwave radiation, and shift rainfall toward more extreme events.
Mei Chong, Shengkai Wang, Xi Chen, Yuan Liang, Bing Pu, Shian-Jiann Lin, Zhi Liang, and Yimin Liu
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-628, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-628, 2026
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
The wind speed needed to lift dust from surfaces governs the highest uncertainty in emission models, making it the root cause of dust forecasting errors. We developed iDust-ut, a global threshold dataset by fusing ground observations, satellite data, and reanalysis products. Tests with the iDust model show doubled severe dust storm prediction accuracy. The dataset works directly in any model with built-in adaptation for wind biases, substantially improving operational dust forecasting worldwide.
Zhixiang Li, Jianhua Lu, and Yimin Liu
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1156, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1156, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This work studies the dynamical linkages, wave parameters, and subseasonal predictability of three successive atmospheric blocking events that are associated with continual extreme events during May–June 2023. We suggest that these interconnected blocking events are dominated by the regime of slowly propagating, large-amplitude planetary-scale waves. The skillful subseasonal predictions depend on capturing upstream quasi-stationary troughs, highlighting sources of subseasonal predictability.
Ruize Sun, Xiao Lu, Haipeng Lin, Tongwen Wu, Xingpei Ye, Lu Shen, Xuan Wang, Haolin Wang, Jingyu Li, Ni Lu, Jiayin Su, Jie Zhang, Fang Zhang, Xiaoge Xin, Xiong Liu, Xiao Yang, and Lin Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 2111–2136, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-2111-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-2111-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We present the development of a global chemistry-climate coupled model BCC-GEOS-Chem v2.0, with improved representation of comprehensive troposphere-stratosphere chemistry and new capability to account for radiative-cloud feedbacks from short-lived climate forcers. The development of the BCC-GEOS-Chem v2.0 provides a useful framework for investigating climate–chemistry interactions and for future projections of global atmospheric chemistry
Mengzhe Zheng, Tongwen Wu, Yixiong Lu, Weihua Jie, Yiming Liu, Xiaoge Xin, Jie Zhang, He Zhao, Xindan Zhang, and Jiajie Yang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-599, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-599, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
The dynamic evolution and interactions of aerosols are first incorporated into the China Meteorological Administration Climate Prediction System version 4 (CMA-CPSv4). This paper evaluates the prediction system's simulation performance for aerosols. The results show that the CMA-CPSv4 reasonably simulates the spatial distribution of aerosols. The reasonable simulation of aerosols is fundamental for studying the impact of aerosols on climate prediction in our next work.
Jun Jian, Peyman Mahmoudi, Pouria Jafari, Alireza Ghaemi, Jing Yang, and Fatemeh Firoozi
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5906, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5906, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Drought varies widely across Iran’s diverse climates, making accurate forecasting challenging. Using 30 years of data and several machine‑learning approaches, we compared autoregressive, climate‑teleconnection, and hybrid models. No single method worked best everywhere, but hybrid models performed most consistently across arid and semi‑arid regions. These findings highlight the need for region‑specific, adaptive drought‑forecasting systems.
Jie Zhang, Kalli Furtado, Steven T. Turnock, Yixiong Lu, Tongwen Wu, Fang Zhang, Xiaoge Xin, and Yuyun Liu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 2175–2189, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-2175-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-2175-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosol cooling has been identified as a key driver of the cold biases in CMIP6 (sixth Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project) models. We demonstrate the critical role of sulfate burden anomaly and the contribution of sulfur removal processes. Faster sulfate deposition directly lowers atmospheric sulfate levels, while enhanced SO₂ deposition reduces the precursor for sulfate formation. The systematically short sulfate lifetime implies that model improvements should focus on SO₂ deposition processes, rather than sulfate deposition.
Weihao Sun, Massimo A. Bollasina, Ioana Colfescu, Guoxiong Wu, and Yimin Liu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 2027–2039, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-2027-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-2027-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Observational records show that the Asian monsoon underwent substantial changes during the early 20th century, including a wetting trend over South Asia and a southward shift in rainfall over East Asia. We show that increasing European sulphate aerosol emissions played a crucial role in shaping the monsoon rainfall trends. This has important implications for reducing uncertainties in monsoon projections, particularly in light of the diverse future aerosol emission scenarios for the region.
Malcolm J. Roberts, Kevin A. Reed, Qing Bao, Joseph J. Barsugli, Suzana J. Camargo, Louis-Philippe Caron, Ping Chang, Cheng-Ta Chen, Hannah M. Christensen, Gokhan Danabasoglu, Ivy Frenger, Neven S. Fučkar, Shabeh ul Hasson, Helene T. Hewitt, Huanping Huang, Daehyun Kim, Chihiro Kodama, Michael Lai, Lai-Yung Ruby Leung, Ryo Mizuta, Paulo Nobre, Pablo Ortega, Dominique Paquin, Christopher D. Roberts, Enrico Scoccimarro, Jon Seddon, Anne Marie Treguier, Chia-Ying Tu, Paul A. Ullrich, Pier Luigi Vidale, Michael F. Wehner, Colin M. Zarzycki, Bosong Zhang, Wei Zhang, and Ming Zhao
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1307–1332, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1307-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1307-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
HighResMIP2 is a model intercomparison project focusing on high-resolution global climate models, that is, those with grid spacings of 25 km or less in the atmosphere and ocean, using simulations of decades to a century in length. We are proposing an update of our simulation protocol to make the models more applicable to key questions for climate variability and hazard in present-day and future projections and to build links with other communities to provide more robust climate information.
Haolin Wang, Xiao Lu, Daniel J. Jacob, Owen R. Cooper, Kai-Lan Chang, Ke Li, Meng Gao, Yiming Liu, Bosi Sheng, Kai Wu, Tongwen Wu, Jie Zhang, Bastien Sauvage, Philippe Nédélec, Romain Blot, and Shaojia Fan
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13753–13782, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13753-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13753-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We report significant global tropospheric ozone increases in 1995–2017 based on extensive aircraft and ozonesonde observations. Using GEOS-Chem (Goddard Earth Observing System chemistry model) multi-decadal global simulations, we find that changes in global anthropogenic emissions, in particular the rapid increases in aircraft emissions, contribute significantly to the increases in tropospheric ozone and resulting radiative impact.
Peter Hitchcock, Amy Butler, Andrew Charlton-Perez, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Tim Stockdale, James Anstey, Dann Mitchell, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Tongwen Wu, Yixiong Lu, Daniele Mastrangelo, Piero Malguzzi, Hai Lin, Ryan Muncaster, Bill Merryfield, Michael Sigmond, Baoqiang Xiang, Liwei Jia, Yu-Kyung Hyun, Jiyoung Oh, Damien Specq, Isla R. Simpson, Jadwiga H. Richter, Cory Barton, Jeff Knight, Eun-Pa Lim, and Harry Hendon
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5073–5092, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5073-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5073-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes an experimental protocol focused on sudden stratospheric warmings to be carried out by subseasonal forecast modeling centers. These will allow for inter-model comparisons of these major disruptions to the stratospheric polar vortex and their impacts on the near-surface flow. The protocol will lead to new insights into the contribution of the stratosphere to subseasonal forecast skill and new approaches to the dynamical attribution of extreme events.
Henry Bowman, Steven Turnock, Susanne E. Bauer, Kostas Tsigaridis, Makoto Deushi, Naga Oshima, Fiona M. O'Connor, Larry Horowitz, Tongwen Wu, Jie Zhang, Dagmar Kubistin, and David D. Parrish
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 3507–3524, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3507-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3507-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A full understanding of ozone in the troposphere requires investigation of its temporal variability over all timescales. Model simulations show that the northern midlatitude ozone seasonal cycle shifted with industrial development (1850–2014), with an increasing magnitude and a later summer peak. That shift reached a maximum in the mid-1980s, followed by a reversal toward the preindustrial cycle. The few available observations, beginning in the 1970s, are consistent with the model simulations.
Jie Zhang, Kalli Furtado, Steven T. Turnock, Jane P. Mulcahy, Laura J. Wilcox, Ben B. Booth, David Sexton, Tongwen Wu, Fang Zhang, and Qianxia Liu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 18609–18627, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18609-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18609-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The CMIP6 ESMs systematically underestimate TAS anomalies in the NH midlatitudes, especially from 1960 to 1990. The anomalous cooling is concurrent in time and space with anthropogenic SO2 emissions. The spurious drop in TAS is attributed to the overestimated aerosol concentrations. The aerosol forcing sensitivity cannot well explain the inter-model spread of PHC biases. And the cloud-amount term accounts for most of the inter-model spread in aerosol forcing sensitivity.
Jinxiao Li, Qing Bao, Yimin Liu, Lei Wang, Jing Yang, Guoxiong Wu, Xiaofei Wu, Bian He, Xiaocong Wang, Xiaoqi Zhang, Yaoxian Yang, and Zili Shen
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6113–6133, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6113-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6113-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The configuration and simulated performance of tropical cyclones (TCs) in FGOALS-f3-L/H will be introduced firstly. The results indicate that the simulated performance of TC activities is improved globally with the increased horizontal resolution especially in TC counts, seasonal cycle, interannual variabilities and intensity aspects. It is worth establishing a high-resolution coupled dynamic prediction system based on FGOALS-f3-H (~ 25 km) to improve the prediction skill of TCs.
Yixiong Lu, Tongwen Wu, Yubin Li, and Ben Yang
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5183–5204, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5183-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5183-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The spurious precipitation in the tropical southeastern Pacific and southern Atlantic is one of the most prominent systematic biases in coupled atmosphere–ocean general circulation models. This study significantly promotes the marine stratus simulation and largely alleviates the excessive precipitation biases through improving parameterizations of boundary-layer turbulence and shallow convection, providing an effective solution to the long-standing bias in the tropical precipitation simulation.
Yongkang Xue, Tandong Yao, Aaron A. Boone, Ismaila Diallo, Ye Liu, Xubin Zeng, William K. M. Lau, Shiori Sugimoto, Qi Tang, Xiaoduo Pan, Peter J. van Oevelen, Daniel Klocke, Myung-Seo Koo, Tomonori Sato, Zhaohui Lin, Yuhei Takaya, Constantin Ardilouze, Stefano Materia, Subodh K. Saha, Retish Senan, Tetsu Nakamura, Hailan Wang, Jing Yang, Hongliang Zhang, Mei Zhao, Xin-Zhong Liang, J. David Neelin, Frederic Vitart, Xin Li, Ping Zhao, Chunxiang Shi, Weidong Guo, Jianping Tang, Miao Yu, Yun Qian, Samuel S. P. Shen, Yang Zhang, Kun Yang, Ruby Leung, Yuan Qiu, Daniele Peano, Xin Qi, Yanling Zhan, Michael A. Brunke, Sin Chan Chou, Michael Ek, Tianyi Fan, Hong Guan, Hai Lin, Shunlin Liang, Helin Wei, Shaocheng Xie, Haoran Xu, Weiping Li, Xueli Shi, Paulo Nobre, Yan Pan, Yi Qin, Jeff Dozier, Craig R. Ferguson, Gianpaolo Balsamo, Qing Bao, Jinming Feng, Jinkyu Hong, Songyou Hong, Huilin Huang, Duoying Ji, Zhenming Ji, Shichang Kang, Yanluan Lin, Weiguang Liu, Ryan Muncaster, Patricia de Rosnay, Hiroshi G. Takahashi, Guiling Wang, Shuyu Wang, Weicai Wang, Xu Zhou, and Yuejian Zhu
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 4465–4494, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4465-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4465-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The subseasonal prediction of extreme hydroclimate events such as droughts/floods has remained stubbornly low for years. This paper presents a new international initiative which, for the first time, introduces spring land surface temperature anomalies over high mountains to improve precipitation prediction through remote effects of land–atmosphere interactions. More than 40 institutions worldwide are participating in this effort. The experimental protocol and preliminary results are presented.
David D. Parrish, Richard G. Derwent, Steven T. Turnock, Fiona M. O'Connor, Johannes Staehelin, Susanne E. Bauer, Makoto Deushi, Naga Oshima, Kostas Tsigaridis, Tongwen Wu, and Jie Zhang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 9669–9679, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9669-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9669-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The few ozone measurements made before the 1980s indicate that industrial development increased ozone concentrations by a factor of ~ 2 at northern midlatitudes, which are now larger than at southern midlatitudes. This difference was much smaller, and likely reversed, in the pre-industrial atmosphere. Earth system models find similar increases, but not higher pre-industrial ozone in the south. This disagreement may indicate that modeled natural ozone sources and/or deposition loss are inadequate.
Cited articles
Adames, Á. F. and Kim, D.: The MJO as a Dispersive, Convectively Coupled Moisture Wave: Theory and Observations, J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 913–941, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0170.1, 2016.
Adames, Á. F. and Wallace, J. M.: Three-Dimensional Structure and Evolution of the MJO and Its Relation to the Mean Flow, J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 2007–2026, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-0254.1, 2014.
Adames, Á. F. and Wallace, J. M.: Three-Dimensional Structure and Evolution of the Moisture Field in the MJO, J. Atmos. Sci., 72, 3733–3754, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0003.1, 2015.
Adler, R. F., Huffman, G. J., Chang, A., Ferraro, R., Xie, P.-P., Janowiak, J., Rudolf, B., Schneider, U., Curtis, S., Bolvin, D., Gruber, A., Susskind, J., Arkin, P., and Nelkin, E.: The Version-2 Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) Monthly Precipitation Analysis (1979–Present), J. Hydrometeorol., 4, 1147–1167, https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2003)004<1147:TVGPCP>2.0.CO;2, 2003.
Ahn, M., Kim, D., Kang, D., Lee, J., Sperber, K. R., Gleckler, P. J., Jiang, X., Ham, Y., and Kim, H.: MJO Propagation Across the Maritime Continent: Are CMIP6 Models Better Than CMIP5 Models?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL087250, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL087250, 2020.
Bao, Q.: Outlook for El Niño and the Indian Ocean Dipole in autumn-winter 2018–2019, Chinese Sci. Bull., 64, 73–78, https://doi.org/10.1360/N972018-00913, 2019.
Bao, Q. and Li, J.: Progress in climate modeling of precipitation over the Tibetan Plateau, Natl. Sci. Rev., 7, 486–487, https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa006, 2020.
Bao, Q., Liu, Y., Wu, G., He, B., Li, J., Wang, L., Wu, X., Chen, K., Wang, X., Yang, J., and Zhang, X.: CAS FGOALS-f3-H and CAS FGOALS-f3-L outputs for the high-resolution model intercomparison project simulation of CMIP6, Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Letters, 13, 576–581, https://doi.org/10.1080/16742834.2020.1814675, 2020.
Bao, Q., He, B., Wu, X., Yang, J., Liu, Y., Wu, G., Zhu, T., Zhou, S., Liu, Y., Tang, Y., Qu, A., Fan, Y., Liu, A., Chen, D., Luo, Z., Hu, X., and Wu, T.: An ensemble subseasonal-to-seasonal forecast system of IAP-CAS model (1.3), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10791355, 2024a.
Bao, Q., He, B., and Wu, X.: Input data of the IAP-CAS S2S system, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10820243, 2024b.
Benedict, J. J. and Randall, D. A.: Observed Characteristics of the MJO Relative to Maximum Rainfall, J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 2332–2354, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3968.1, 2007.
Bessafi, M. and Wheeler, M. C.: Modulation of south Indian ocean tropical cyclones by the Madden-Julian oscillation and convectively coupled equatorial waves, Mon. Weather Rev., 134, 638–656, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3087.1, 2006.
Cassou, C.: Intraseasonal interaction between the Madden-Julian Oscillation and the North Atlantic Oscillation, Nature, 455, 523–527, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07286, 2008.
Chen, G., Ling, J., Zhang, R., Xiao, Z., and Li, C.: The MJO From CMIP5 to CMIP6: Perspectives From Tracking MJO Precipitation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2021GL095241, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095241, 2022.
Craig, A. P., Vertenstein, M., and Jacob, R.: A new flexible coupler for earth system modeling developed for CCSM4 and CESM1, Int. J. High Perform. C., 26, 31–42, https://doi.org/10.1177/1094342011428141, 2012.
Crueger, T., Stevens, B., and Brokopf, R.: The Madden-Julian Oscillation in ECHAM6 and the Introduction of an Objective MJO Metric, J. Climate, 26, 3241–3257, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00413.1, 2013.
DeMott, C. A., Wolding, B. O., Maloney, E. D., and Randall, D. A.: Atmospheric Mechanisms for MJO Decay Over the Maritime Continent, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 5188–5204, https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JD026979, 2018.
Ferreira, R. N., Schubert, W. H., and Hack, J. J.: Dynamical aspects of twin tropical cyclones associated with the Madden-Julian oscillation, J. Atmos. Sci., 53, 929–945, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1996)053<0929:DAOTTC>2.0.CO;2, 1996.
Gonzalez, A. O. and Jiang, X.: Winter mean lower tropospheric moisture over the Maritime Continent as a climate model diagnostic metric for the propagation of the Madden-Julian oscillation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 2588–2596, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL072430, 2017.
Goswami, B. N.: South asian monsoon, Springer, 2012.
Gottschalck, J., Wheeler, M., Weickmann, K., Vitart, F., Savage, N., Lin, H., Hendon, H., Waliser, D., Sperber, K., Nakagawa, M., Prestrelo, C., Flatau, M., and Higgins, W.: A Framework for Assessing Operational Madden-Julian Oscillation Forecasts: A CLIVAR MJO Working Group Project, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 91, 1247–1258, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010BAMS2816.1, 2010.
Hall, J. D., Matthews, A. J., and Karoly, D. J.: The modulation of tropical cyclone activity in the Australian region by the Madden-Julian oscillation, Mon. Weather Rev., 129, 2970–2982, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<2970:TMOTCA>2.0.CO;2, 2001.
Hannah, W. M., Maloney, E. D., and Pritchard, M. S.: Consequences of systematic model drift in DYNAMO MJO hindcasts with SP-CAM and CAM5, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 7, 1051–1074, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014MS000423, 2015.
Harris, L., Zhou, L., Lin, S.-J., Chen, J.-H., Chen, X., Gao, K., Morin, M., Rees, S., Sun, Y., Tong, M., Xiang, B., Bender, M., Benson, R., Cheng, K.-Y., Clark, S., Elbert, O. D., Hazelton, A., Huff, J. J., Kaltenbaugh, A., Liang, Z., Marchok, T., Shin, H. H., and Stern, W.: GFDL SHiELD: A Unified System for Weather-to-Seasonal Prediction, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2020MS002223, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002223, 2020.
Hendon, H. H. and Salby, M. L.: The Life Cycle of the Madden-Julian Oscillation, J. Atmos. Sci., 51, 2225–2237, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1994)051<2225:TLCOTM>2.0.CO;2, 1994.
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Biavati, G., Horányi, A., Muñoz Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Rozum, I., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Dee, D., and Thépaut, J.-N.: ERA5 hourly data on pressure levels from 1940 to present, Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) [data set], https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.bd0915c6, 2023.
Hoffman, R. N. and Kalnay, E.: Lagged average forecasting, an alternative to Monte Carlo forecasting, Tellus A, 35, 100–118, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v35i2.11425, 1983.
Hou, D., Kalnay, E., and Droegemeier, K. K.: Objective Verification of the SAMEX ’98 Ensemble Forecasts, Mon. Weather Rev., 129, 73–91, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0073:OVOTSE>2.0.CO;2, 2001.
Hsu, H.-H.: Intraseasonal variability of the atmosphere–ocean–climate system: East Asian monsoon, in: Intraseasonal Variability in the Atmosphere-Ocean Climate System, edited by: Lau, W. K.-M. and Waliser, D. E., Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 73–110, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13914-7_3, 2012.
Hsu, H. H. and Lee, M. Y.: Topographic effects on the eastward propagation and initiation of the Madden-Julian oscillation, J. Climate, 18, 795–809, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-3292.1, 2005.
Hsu, P. and Li, T.: Role of the Boundary Layer Moisture Asymmetry in Causing the Eastward Propagation of the Madden-Julian Oscillation, J. Climate, 25, 4914–4931, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00310.1, 2012.
Huang, B., Liu, C., Banzon, V. F., Freeman, E., Graham, G., Hankins, W., Smith, T. M., and Zhang, H.-M.: NOAA 0.25-degree Daily Optimum Interpolation Sea Surface Temperature (OISST), Version 2.1, NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information [data set], https://doi.org/10.25921/RE9P-PT57, 2020.
Hung, M.-P., Lin, J.-L., Wang, W., Kim, D., Shinoda, T., and Weaver, S. J.: MJO and Convectively Coupled Equatorial Waves Simulated by CMIP5 Climate Models, J. Climate, 26, 6185–6214, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00541.1, 2013.
Hunke, E. C., Lipscomb, W. H., Turner, A. K., Jeffery, N., and Elliott, S.: Cice: the los alamos sea ice model documentation and software user's manual version 4.1 la-cc-06-012, T-3 Fluid Dynamics Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, 675, 500, 2010.
Inness, P. M. and Slingo, J. M.: The interaction of the Madden-Julian Oscillation with the Maritime Continent in a GCM, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 132, 1645–1667, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.05.102, 2006.
Jeuken, A. B. M., Siegmund, P. C., Heijboer, L. C., Feichter, J., and Bengtsson, L.: On the potential of assimilating meteorological analyses in a global climate model for the purpose of model validation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 16939–16950, https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD01218, 1996.
Jiang, X.: Key processes for the eastward propagation of the Madden-Julian Oscillation based on multimodel simulations: Key Model Processes for MJO Propagation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 755–770, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025955, 2017.
Jiang, X., Adames, Á. F., Zhao, M., Waliser, D., and Maloney, E.: A Unified Moisture Mode Framework for Seasonality of the Madden-Julian Oscillation, J. Climate, 31, 4215–4224, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0671.1, 2018.
Kanamitsu, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Woollen, J., Yang, S.-K., Hnilo, J. J., Fiorino, M., and Potter, G. L.: NCEP–DOE AMIP-II Reanalysis (R-2), Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 83, 1631–1644, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-83-11-1631, 2002.
Kemball-Cook, S. R. and Weare, B. C.: The Onset of Convection in the Madden-Julian Oscillation, J. Climate, 14, 780–793, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<0780:TOOCIT>2.0.CO;2, 2001.
Kerbyson, D. J. and Jones, P. W.: A Performance Model of the Parallel Ocean Program, Int. J. High Perform. C., 19, 261–276, https://doi.org/10.1177/1094342005056114, 2005.
Kim, D., Kug, J.-S., and Sobel, A. H.: Propagating versus Nonpropagating Madden-Julian Oscillation Events, J. Climate, 27, 111–125, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00084.1, 2014.
Kim, H.: MJO Propagation Processes and Mean Biases in the SubX and S2S Reforecasts, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 9314–9331, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031139, 2019.
Kim, H., Vitart, F., and Waliser, D. E.: Prediction of the Madden-Julian Oscillation: A Review, J. Climate, 31, 9425–9443, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0210.1, 2018.
Kim, H.-M.: The impact of the mean moisture bias on the key physics of MJO propagation in the ECMWF reforecast, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 7772–7784, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027005, 2017.
Kim, H.-M., Webster, P. J., Toma, V. E., and Kim, D.: Predictability and Prediction Skill of the MJO in Two Operational Forecasting Systems, J. Climate, 27, 5364–5378, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00480.1, 2014.
Lau, K.-M. and Chan, P. H.: Aspects of the 40–50 Day Oscillation during the Northern Summer as Inferred from Outgoing Longwave Radiation, Mon. Weather Rev., 114, 1354–1367, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1986)114<1354:AOTDOD>2.0.CO;2, 1986.
Lau, W. K. M. and Waliser, D. E.: El Niño Southern Oscillation connection, in: Intraseasonal Variability in the Atmosphere-Ocean Climate System, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 297–334, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13914-7_9, 2012.
Lawrence, D. M., Oleson, K. W., Flanner, M. G., Thornton, P. E., Swenson, S. C., Lawrence, P. J., Zeng, X., Yang, Z.-L., Levis, S., Sakaguchi, K., Bonan, G. B., and Slater, A. G.: Parameterization improvements and functional and structural advances in Version 4 of the Community Land Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 3, M03001, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011MS00045, 2011.
Leutbecher, M. and Palmer, T. N.: Ensemble forecasting, J. Comput. Phys., 227, 3515–3539, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2007.02.014, 2008.
Li, J., Bao, Q., Liu, Y., Wu, G., Wang, L., He, B., Wang, X., and Li, J.: Evaluation of FAMIL2 in Simulating the Climatology and Seasonal-to-Interannual Variability of Tropical Cyclone Characteristics, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 11, 1117–1136, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001506, 2019.
Liebmann, B. and Smith, C. A.: Description of a Complete (Interpolated) Outgoing Longwave Radiation Dataset, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77, 1275–1277, 1996.
Lim, Y., Son, S.-W., and Kim, D.: MJO Prediction Skill of the Subseasonal-to-Seasonal Prediction Models, J. Climate, 31, 4075–4094, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0545.1, 2018.
Lin, H., Brunet, G., and Derome, J.: Forecast Skill of the Madden-Julian Oscillation in Two Canadian Atmospheric Models, Mon. Weather Rev., 136, 4130–4149, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2459.1, 2008.
Lin, S.-J.: A “Vertically Lagrangian” Finite-Volume Dynamical Core for Global Models, Mon. Weather Rev., 132, 2293–2307, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<2293:AVLFDC>2.0.CO;2, 2004.
Liu, F., Wang, B., Ouyang, Y., Wang, H., Qiao, S., Chen, G., and Dong, W.: Intraseasonal variability of global land monsoon precipitation and its recent trend, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 5, 30, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-022-00253-7, 2022.
Liu, Y.: Dynamic MJO forecasts using an ensemble subseasonal-to-seasonal forecast system of IAP-CAS model, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10817813, 2024.
Liu, Y. Q.: Prediction of monthly-seasonal precipitation using coupled SVD patterns between soil moisture and subsequent precipitation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1827, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017709, 2003.
Madden, R. A. and Julian, P. R.: Detection of a 40–50 Day Oscillation in the Zonal Wind in the Tropical Pacific, J. Atmos. Sci., 28, 702–708, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1971)028<0702:DOADOI>2.0.CO;2, 1971.
Maloney, E. D.: An Intraseasonal Oscillation Composite Life Cycle in the NCAR CCM3.6 with Modified Convection, J. Climate, 15, 964–982, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<0964:AIOCLC>2.0.CO;2, 2002.
Mu, M., Duan, W. S., and Wang, B.: Conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation and its applications, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 10, 493–501, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-10-493-2003, 2003.
Mureau, R., Molteni, F., and Palmer, T. N.: Ensemble prediction using dynamically conditioned perturbations, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 119, 299–323, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49711951005, 1993.
Nasuno, T., Li, T., and Kikuchi, K.: Moistening Processes before the Convective Initiation of Madden-Julian Oscillation Events during the CINDY2011/DYNAMO Period, Mon. Weather Rev., 143, 622–643, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-14-00132.1, 2015.
National Centers for Environmental Prediction/National Weather Service/NOAA/U.S. Department of Commerce: NCEP FNL Operational Model Global Tropospheric Analyses, continuing from July 1999, Research Data Archive at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, Computational and Information Systems Laboratory [data set], https://doi.org/10.5065/D6M043C6, 2000, updated daily.
National Centers for Environmental Prediction/National Weather Service/NOAA/U.S. Department of Commerce: NCEP GFS 0.25 Degree Global Forecast Grids Historical Archive, Research Data Archive at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, Computational and Information Systems Laboratory [data set], https://doi.org/10.5065/D65D8PWK, 2015.
Neena, J. M., Lee, J. Y., Waliser, D., Wang, B., and Jiang, X.: Predictability of the Madden-Julian Oscillation in the Intraseasonal Variability Hindcast Experiment (ISVHE), J. Climate, 27, 4531–4543, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00624.1, 2014.
Nerger, L., Tang, Q., and Mu, L.: Efficient ensemble data assimilation for coupled models with the Parallel Data Assimilation Framework: example of AWI-CM (AWI-CM-PDAF 1.0), Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4305–4321, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4305-2020, 2020.
Oleson, W., Lawrence, M., Bonan, B., Flanner, G., Kluzek, E., Lawrence, J., Levis, S., Swenson, C., Thornton, E., Dai, A., Decker, M., Dickinson, R., Feddema, J., Heald, L., Hoffman, F., Lamarque, J.-F., Mahowald, N., Niu, G.-Y., Qian, T., Randerson, J., Running, S., Sakaguchi, K., Slater, A., Stockli, R., Wang, A., Yang, Z.-L., Zeng, X., and Zeng, X.: Technical Description of version 4.0 of the Community Land Model (CLM), University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, https://doi.org/10.5065/D6FB50WZ, 2010.
Park, S. and Bretherton, C. S.: The University of Washington Shallow Convection and Moist Turbulence Schemes and Their Impact on Climate Simulations with the Community Atmosphere Model, J. Climate, 22, 3449–3469, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2557.1, 2009.
Pham, D. T.: Stochastic Methods for Sequential Data Assimilation in Strongly Nonlinear Systems, Mon. Weather Rev., 129, 1194–1207, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<1194:SMFSDA>2.0.CO;2, 2001.
Putman, W. M. and Lin, S.-J.: Finite-volume transport on various cubed-sphere grids, J. Comput. Phys., 227, 55–78, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2007.07.022, 2007.
Rashid, H. A., Hendon, H. H., Wheeler, M. C., and Alves, O.: Prediction of the Madden-Julian oscillation with the POAMA dynamical prediction system, Clim. Dynam., 36, 649–661, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0754-x, 2011.
Raymond, D. J. and Fuchs, Ž.: Moisture Modes and the Madden-Julian Oscillation, J. Climate, 22, 3031–3046, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2739.1, 2009.
Reynolds, R. W., Smith, T. M., Liu, C., Chelton, D. B., Casey, K. S., and Schlax, M. G.: Daily High-Resolution-Blended Analyses for Sea Surface Temperature, J. Climate, 20, 5473–5496, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI1824.1, 2007.
Rousseeuw, P.: Silhouettes – a Graphical Aid to the Interpretation and Validation of Cluster-Analysis, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 20, 53–65, https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7, 1987.
Rui, H. and Wang, B.: Development Characteristics and Dynamic Structure of Tropical Intraseasonal Convection Anomalies, J. Atmos. Sci., 47, 357–379, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1990)047<0357:DCADSO>2.0.CO;2, 1990.
Vitart, F.: Madden—Julian Oscillation prediction and teleconnections in the S2S database, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 143, 2210–2220, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3079, 2017.
Vitart, F. and Molteni, F.: Dynamical Extended-Range Prediction of Early Monsoon Rainfall over India, Mon. Weather Rev., 137, 1480–1492, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2761.1, 2009.
Vitart, F. and Molteni, F.: Simulation of the Madden-Julian Oscillation and its teleconnections in the ECMWF forecast system, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 136, 842–855, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.623, 2010.
Vitart, F., Ardilouze, C., Bonet, A., Brookshaw, A., Chen, M., Codorean, C., Déqué, M., Ferranti, L., Fucile, E., Fuentes, M., Hendon, H., Hodgson, J., Kang, H.-S., Kumar, A., Lin, H., Liu, G., Liu, X., Malguzzi, P., Mallas, I., Manoussakis, M., Mastrangelo, D., MacLachlan, C., McLean, P., Minami, A., Mladek, R., Nakazawa, T., Najm, S., Nie, Y., Rixen, M., Robertson, A. W., Ruti, P., Sun, C., Takaya, Y., Tolstykh, M., Venuti, F., Waliser, D., Woolnough, S., Wu, T., Won, D.-J., Xiao, H., Zaripov, R., and Zhang, L.: The Subseasonal to Seasonal (S2S) Prediction Project Database, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98, 163–173, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0017.1, 2017 (data available at: https://apps.ecmwf.int/datasets, last access: 1 July 2023).
Waliser, D. E., Lau, K. M., Stern, W., and Jones, C.: Potential Predictability of the Madden-Julian Oscillation, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 84, 33–50, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-84-1-33, 2003.
Wang, B.: Dynamics of Tropical Low-Frequency Waves: An Analysis of the Moist Kelvin Wave, J. Atmos. Sci., 45, 2051–2065, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1988)045<2051:DOTLFW>2.0.CO;2, 1988.
Wang, B. and Lee, S.-S.: MJO Propagation Shaped by Zonal Asymmetric Structures: Results from 24 GCM Simulations, J. Climate, 30, 7933–7952, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0873.1, 2017.
Wang, B., Chen, G., and Liu, F.: Diversity of the Madden-Julian Oscillation, Sci. Adv., 5, eaax0220, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax0220, 2019.
Wang, W., Hung, M.-P., Weaver, S. J., Kumar, A., and Fu, X.: MJO prediction in the NCEP Climate Forecast System version 2, Clim. Dyn., 42, 2509–2520, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1806-9, 2014.
Wheeler, M. C. and Hendon, H. H.: An All-Season Real-Time Multivariate MJO Index: Development of an Index for Monitoring and Prediction, Mon. Weather Rev., 132, 1917–1932, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<1917:AARMMI>2.0.CO;2, 2004.
Wheeler, M. C., Hendon, H. H., Cleland, S., Meinke, H., and Donald, A.: Impacts of the Madden-Julian Oscillation on Australian Rainfall and Circulation, J. Climate, 22, 1482–1498, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2595.1, 2009.
Wu, C.-H. and Hsu, H.-H.: Topographic Influence on the MJO in the Maritime Continent, J. Climate, 22, 5433–5448, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2825.1, 2009.
Wu, X., Deng, L., Song, X., Vettoretti, G., Peltier, W. R., and Zhang, G. J.: Impact of a modified convective scheme on the Madden-Julian Oscillation and El Niño-Southern Oscillation in a coupled climate model: MJO AND ENSO SIMULATED BY A COUPLED GCM, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L16823, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030637, 2007.
Xiang, B., Zhao, M., Jiang, X., Lin, S.-J., Li, T., Fu, X., and Vecchi, G.: The 3–4-Week MJO Prediction Skill in a GFDL Coupled Model, J. Climate, 28, 5351–5364, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0102.1, 2015.
Xiang, B., Harris, L., Delworth, T. L., Wang, B., Chen, G., Chen, J.-H., Clark, S. K., Cooke, W. F., Gao, K., Huff, J. J., Jia, L., Johnson, N. C., Kapnick, S. B., Lu, F., McHugh, C., Sun, Y., Tong, M., Yang, X., Zeng, F., Zhao, M., Zhou, L., and Zhou, X.: S2S Prediction in GFDL SPEAR: MJO Diversity and Teleconnections, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 103, E463–E484, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0124.1, 2022.
Yang, C., Liu, J., and Xu, S.: Seasonal Arctic Sea Ice Prediction Using a Newly Developed Fully Coupled Regional Model With the Assimilation of Satellite Sea Ice Observations, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2019MS001938, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001938, 2020.
Zeng, L., Bao, Q., Wu, X., He, B., Yang, J., Wang, T., Liu, Y., Wu, G., and Liu, Y.: Impacts of humidity initialization on MJO prediction: A study in an operational sub-seasonal to seasonal system, Atmos. Res., 294, 106946, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2023.106946, 2023.
Zhang, C.: Madden-Julian Oscillation, Rev. Geophys., 43, RG2003, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004RG000158, 2005.
Zhou, L. and Harris, L.: Integrated Dynamics-Physics Coupling for Weather to Climate Models: GFDL SHiELD With In-Line Microphysics, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2022GL100519, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL100519, 2022.
Zhou, L., Lin, S.-J., Chen, J.-H., Harris, L. M., Chen, X., and Rees, S. L.: Toward Convective-Scale Prediction within the Next Generation Global Prediction System, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 100, 1225–1243, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0246.1, 2019.
Short summary
We give an overview of the Institute of Atmospheric Physics–Chinese Academy of Sciences subseasonal-to-seasonal ensemble forecasting system and Madden–Julian Oscillation forecast evaluation of the system. Compared to other S2S models, the IAP-CAS model has its benefits but also biases, i.e., underdispersive ensemble, overestimated amplitude, and faster propagation speed when forecasting MJO. We provide a reason for these biases and prospects for further improvement of this system in the future.
We give an overview of the Institute of Atmospheric Physics–Chinese Academy of Sciences...
