Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 17, issue 16
Articles | Volume 17, issue 16
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6249-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6249-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 17, issue 16
Model experiment description paper
 | 
23 Aug 2024
Model experiment description paper |  | 23 Aug 2024

Dynamical Madden–Julian Oscillation forecasts using an ensemble subseasonal-to-seasonal forecast system of the IAP-CAS model

Yangke Liu, Qing Bao, Bian He, Xiaofei Wu, Jing Yang, Yimin Liu, Guoxiong Wu, Tao Zhu, Siyuan Zhou, Yao Tang, Ankang Qu, Yalan Fan, Anling Liu, Dandan Chen, Zhaoming Luo, Xing Hu, and Tongwen Wu

Viewed

Total article views: 576 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
421 114 41 576 21 20
  • HTML: 421
  • PDF: 114
  • XML: 41
  • Total: 576
  • BibTeX: 21
  • EndNote: 20
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Mar 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 Mar 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 576 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 598 with geography defined and -22 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 31 Aug 2024
Download
Short summary
We give an overview of the Institute of Atmospheric Physics–Chinese Academy of Sciences subseasonal-to-seasonal ensemble forecasting system and Madden–Julian Oscillation forecast evaluation of the system. Compared to other S2S models, the IAP-CAS model has its benefits but also biases, i.e., underdispersive ensemble, overestimated amplitude, and faster propagation speed when forecasting MJO. We provide a reason for these biases and prospects for further improvement of this system in the future.
Read more