Articles | Volume 16, issue 3
Model evaluation paper
06 Feb 2023
Model evaluation paper |  | 06 Feb 2023

Implementation of HONO into the chemistry–climate model CHASER (V4.0): roles in tropospheric chemistry

Phuc Thi Minh Ha, Yugo Kanaya, Fumikazu Taketani, Maria Dolores Andrés Hernández, Benjamin Schreiner, Klaus Pfeilsticker, and Kengo Sudo

Related authors

Effects of heterogeneous reactions on tropospheric chemistry: a global simulation with the chemistry–climate model CHASER V4.0
Phuc T. M. Ha, Ryoki Matsuda, Yugo Kanaya, Fumikazu Taketani, and Kengo Sudo
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3813–3841,,, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
A general comprehensive evaluation method for cross-scale precipitation forecasts
Bing Zhang, Mingjian Zeng, Anning Huang, Zhengkun Qin, Couhua Liu, Wenru Shi, Xin Li, Kefeng Zhu, Chunlei Gu, and Jialing Zhou
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4579–4601,,, 2024
Short summary
Implementation of a Simple Actuator Disk for Large-Eddy Simulation in the Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF-SADLES v1.2) for wind turbine wake simulation
Hai Bui, Mostafa Bakhoday-Paskyabi, and Mohammadreza Mohammadpour-Penchah
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4447–4465,,, 2024
Short summary
WRF-PDAF v1.0: implementation and application of an online localized ensemble data assimilation framework
Changliang Shao and Lars Nerger
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4433–4445,,, 2024
Short summary
Implementation and evaluation of diabatic advection in the Lagrangian transport model MPTRAC 2.6
Jan Clemens, Lars Hoffmann, Bärbel Vogel, Sabine Grießbach, and Nicole Thomas
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4467–4493,,, 2024
Short summary
An improved and extended parameterization of the CO2 15 µm cooling in the middle and upper atmosphere (CO2_cool_fort-1.0)
Manuel López-Puertas, Federico Fabiano, Victor Fomichev, Bernd Funke, and Daniel R. Marsh
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4401–4432,,, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Acker, K., Möller, D., Wieprecht, W., Auel, R., Kalass, D., and Tscherwenka, W.: Nitrous and nitric acid measurements inside and outside of clouds at Mt. Brocken, Water Air Soil Poll., 130, 331–336,, 2001. 
Acker, K., Febo, A., Trick, S., Perrino, C., Bruno, P., Wiesen, P., Moller, D., Wieprecht, W., Auel, R., Giusto, M., Geyer, A., Platt, U., and Allegrini, I.: Nitrous acid in the urban area of Rome, Atmos. Environ., 40, 3123–3133,, 2006. 
Akimoto, H., Nagashima, T., Li, J., Fu, J. S., Ji, D., Tan, J., and Wang, Z.: Comparison of surface ozone simulation among selected regional models in MICS-Asia III – effects of chemistry and vertical transport for the causes of difference, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 603–615,, 2019. 
Al-Abadleh, H. A. and Grassian, V. H.: Heterogeneous reaction of NO2 on hexane soot: A Knudsen cell and FT-IR study, J. Phys. Chem. A, 104, 11926–11933, 2000. 
Ammann, M., Kalberer, M., Jost, D. T., Tobler, L., Rossler, E., Piguet, D., Gaggeler, H. W., and Baltensperger, U.: Heterogeneous production of nitrous acid on soot in polluted air masses, Nature, 395, 157–160, 1998. 
Short summary
HONO affects tropospheric oxidizing capacity; thus, it is implemented into the chemistry–climate model CHASER. The model substantially underpredicts daytime HONO, while nitrate photolysis on surfaces can supplement the daytime HONO budget. Current HONO chemistry predicts reductions of 20.4 % for global tropospheric NOx, 40–67 % for OH, and 30–45 % for O3 in the summer North Pacific. In contrast, OH and O3 winter levels in China are greatly enhanced.