Articles | Volume 15, issue 12
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4689–4708, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4689-2022

Special issue: The Loop 3D stochastic geological modelling platform – development...

Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4689–4708, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4689-2022
Methods for assessment of models
20 Jun 2022
Methods for assessment of models | 20 Jun 2022

loopUI-0.1: indicators to support needs and practices in 3D geological modelling uncertainty quantification

Guillaume Pirot et al.

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on gmd-2021-377', Anonymous Referee #1, 25 Feb 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on gmd-2021-377', Anonymous Referee #2, 09 Apr 2022
  • RC3: 'Comment on gmd-2021-377', Anonymous Referee #3, 16 Apr 2022

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Guillaume Pirot on behalf of the Authors (09 May 2022)  Author's response    Author's tracked changes    Manuscript
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (12 May 2022) by Thomas Poulet
AR by Guillaume Pirot on behalf of the Authors (16 May 2022)  Author's response    Author's tracked changes    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (18 May 2022) by Thomas Poulet
Download
Short summary
Results of a survey launched among practitioners in the mineral industry show that despite recognising the importance of uncertainty quantification it is not very well performed due to lack of data, time requirements, poor tracking of interpretations and relative complexity of uncertainty quantification. To alleviate the latter, we provide an open-source set of local and global indicators to measure geological uncertainty among an ensemble of geological models.